Brooks argues that, far from this faade of ideological diversity, the IDW is built around a single and deep ideological commitment. This commitment is the preservation of presently established power hierarchies.
In a world in which conservative and libertarian pundits are practically trampling over each other to write the next takedown of leftist college students and social justice warriors, one might rightfully wonder, Where is the Lefts reply to all of this? In some ways, Michael Brooks upcoming Zero Books monograph Against the Web: A Cosmopolitan Answer to the New Right is exactly that. By this, I do not mean to say it is analogous but with an opposite ideology. Instead, it is a necessary argument against the industry that thrives on such inane polemics.
Last week, my Merion West colleague Matt McManus published his own review of Against the Web. In it, he gives a detailed analysis of the books various chapters with commentary on what he sees as valuable in Brooks book, which is the majority of it. McManus also raises a few issues he has with it. Because I think doing the same would add little valueand because I largely agree with McManuss pointsI want to take a different approach to reviewing the book. I have been familiar with Michael Brooks work for a few years now, both on The Majority Report, which he co-hosts with Sam Seder, and his own show, The Michael Brooks Show (TMBS). Both shows understandably share many aspects. However, the former leans more towards news and left-wing commentary on day-to-day issues and politics, while the latter tilts more heavily towards theory and commentary on systemic, big picture themes. In that sense, I want to give the book a more TMBS treatment and look at its general arguments and the way they are put forward.
The particular subject of Against the Web is the so-called Intellectual Dark Web and, more specifically, three of its central figures: Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson, and Ben Shapiro. Beyond the three of them, there is some discussion of other members and adjacent figures such as Dave Rubin, Joe Rogan, and the online magazine Quillette. All of these have been active participants in the aforementioned SJW takedown marathon. What is interesting about this group is the way they see and present themselves. The core argument that Brooks puts forward is that this self-image is a complete fantasy. There are many tropes and clichs in the IDWs view of themselves: notably, their insistence on being paragons of reason and logic, their need to ask the hard questions, and their incessant warnings about the radical left. However, these are better understood as tools that allow them to present themselves as a group of public intellectuals brimming with ideological diversity. That is key because being able to present themselves as such a diverse group ideologically allows them to portray their criticisms of the Left (and it is almost always the Left) as somehow fair and balanced. Brooks argues that, far from this faade of ideological diversity, the IDW is built around a single and deep ideological commitment. This commitment is the preservation of presently established power hierarchies.
One might watch or listen to a discussion between, for example, Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson and come out with the impression that the two could not be more different. The former advocates for a number of socially liberal policies, has expressed support for the Democratic Party, and, perhaps most importantly, is a staunch atheist and a strident critic of religion. Peterson, on the other hand, is a social conservative, a Christian, and religion plays a fundamental part in his worldview. But Against the Web does an excellent job of showing how this is little more than a coat of paint. Peterson uses Jungian psychoanalysis to justify existing hierarchies through myths, stories, and religion. In Petersons view, the capitalist hierarchical structure of owners and workers which, in turn, produces economic inequality is justified and necessary because it is etched deep in our psyche, as evidenced by our myths and stories. Harris, consistent with his superficially different worldview, takes a different approach but arrives at much of the same conclusions. Rather than myth and religion, Harris relies on issues like IQ differences, cultural development, or the influence of religion to justify both an individuals place in society, as well as the roles and relative power of states within the international order. The result is the same: Society is mostly just. There may be some small changes that we could make, but the basic structure of societyto borrow John Rawls phrasingshould not be altered.
Brooks contrasts these points of view with one that historicizes hierarchies and inequalities. While nature and myth are, in many ways, polar opposites, what they share is a rigid imperviousness to change. Nature, of course, changes through evolutionary processes, but the time scale of evolution is orders of magnitude larger than that of a human life. So, for us, it might as well be fixed. Myth is of a divine nature. As such, what is grounded in mythology is, in some sense, ordained by a higher power. So, while myth and nature are antithetical in important respects, they fulfill identical functions as grounding for a political philosophy. A historical perspective, which is what Against the Web advocates, explains hierarchies and inequalities as the result of human-made historical processes and power relations. This does not mean, as Brooks himself admits, that every hierarchy is unjust and must be dismantled. One example he gives of an appropriate hierarchy is the relationship between parents and their children. What is the case, however, is that every hierarchy should be subject to the lens of historical scrutiny to explain how it came about. In doing so, we can judge a given hierarchys ethical value.
The other aspect of the book I want to discuss is the way it delivers its message. While the content itself is serious, the style is much less so. This is not intended as criticism. In fact, personally, I enjoyed the tone considerably. In a video for Zero Books in which he discusses his book Give Them and Argument: Logic for the Left, Ben Burgis opens by saying that he laments the impulse of many on the Left to simply mock what, in their view, are obviously useless arguments put forward by conservatives or libertarians. Instead, the substance of these arguments should be engaged with. I think it is fair to say that Against the Web does this, while also using a mocking tone when appropriate. This comes across particularly in the chapters on Harris and Peterson. Brooks seriously considers their arguments and the audience to which they are speaking. He then provides coherent alternatives drawing from a wealth of leftist literature. Yet, he never shies away from ridicule and mockery.
This is a very interesting stylistic decision, and one that I welcome personally. Regardless of how accurate this characterization is, I think it is fair to say that the Right has mostly succeeded in painting leftists as sanctimonious and hysterical. I would, of course, contend that that is a mischaracterization, and the veracity of their charge is limited to a small number of those of us on the Left. Brooks, however, acknowledges that there is a hysteria problem that exists in some sectors of the Left when he discusses Mark Fishers brilliant essay Exiting the Vampire Castle. However, in the end, for better or worse, this image of leftists seems to have stuck. I cannot speak for every leftist writer or content creator who chooses to seriously engage with right-wing thought. However, if their experience is in any way similar to mine, then they most likely also have to choose among certain stylistic possibilities.
I have previously written about the IDWs (and particularly Petersons) treatment of the concept of equalityand about this renewed interest in the idea of Western Civilization. I am not exaggerating when I say that I found several of the arguments put forward by the opposite side to be absolutely ludicrous. If I had not been trying to remain serious, I would have referred to the latter concept exclusively as Western Civilization. Many of us would likely be less measured in our tone, if we were not trying to combat this image of leftists. Brooks, however, does not seem to mind in the slightest. Honestly, I found this quite refreshing and perhaps somewhat cathartic. I want to be very clear: I still think carefully considering opposing views, deconstructing arguments, and presenting reasonable alternatives is essential. And there is that in Against the Web. However, all of that notwithstanding, it is always satisfying to call a spade a spade.
As with every choice, of course, there is always a downside to the final decision; otherwise, it would not be much of a choice. In this case, I think the downside is that the style will make it all too easy for ideological opponents to label Against the Web as just another product of leftist hysteria and sanctimony. Rather than considering the arguments put forward, I imagine some conservatives will simply point to the appalling way in which the honorable Dr. Jordan Bernt Peterson, PhD and Dr. Samuel Benjamin Harris, PhD have been treated. This is a shame because I believe the central tenet of Brooks book is very valuable. And, those who find themselves on the receiving end of the books critiques (or even just those siding with his targets of criticism) would do well to pay attention to Brooks points. Now, I have no illusions about those figures being discussed in the book changing their minds. The same is likely also true for their fans. I do think, however, that some small percentage of these fans (those who are on the fence) might be open to being won over by arguments such as the ones Brooks forwards.
With that said, however, if I were trying to win over lukewarm conservatives, I might recommend a book other thanAgainst the Web, given Brooks tone at times.However, I do not think this takes away from Brooks work. His arguments can still be presented by others in a different tone, and, after all, his book is likely intended primarily for a leftist audience trying to find arguments such as these.Against the Webis not aboutconvincing those on the other side.
Overall, Against the Web is a welcome addition to the left-wing arsenal in the culture war in whichwhether we like it, want it, or know itwe are all immersed in. The central thesis of the book is correct, and people on both sides would do well to take it seriously. The style and tone, especially when understood as a book by a leftist for other leftists, is funny and refreshing.
Nstor de Buen holds an M.A. in social sciences from The University of Chicago. He has previously written at Quillette.
Michael Brooks' New Book Hits the Mark - Merion West
- Confessions of a jaded NZ bookseller - The Spinoff - August 2nd, 2020
- Dont bank on Britains foppish, lazy elites to save us from deep fakery - The Guardian - August 2nd, 2020
- Will the real fascist please stand up? - Fallbrook / Bonsall Villlage News - July 31st, 2020
- Hess Jr. claims third win in a row at Eriez | News, Sports, Jobs - timesobserver.com - July 31st, 2020
- 5-year-old boy severely injured after being run over during camping trip - East Idaho News - July 27th, 2020
- Peterson: Last call for the Top 120 of 2020 - The Topeka Capital-Journal - July 27th, 2020
- MALCOLM: Fair coverage of the Conservative leadership is missing - Toronto Sun - July 27th, 2020
- 'Your inner voice will need to be your compass': Turners Falls High School says goodbye to Class of 2020 - The Recorder - July 27th, 2020
- Taibbi, Harper's and the Intellectual Dark Web - CounterPunch.org - CounterPunch - July 27th, 2020
- This Week in Podcasts: feat. Big Shiny Takes, Oats for Breakfast and more | Ricochet - Ricochet Media - July 5th, 2020
- TCW's top ten blogs of the week - The Conservative Woman - July 5th, 2020
- Nietzsche meets Netflix: the killer philosophy behind The Sinner - The Telegraph - July 2nd, 2020
- Bishop Robert Barron on Internet ministry, Black Lives Matter and the art of dialogue - America Magazine - June 30th, 2020
- The fall of Cambridge University - TheArticle - June 30th, 2020
- Sorry, not sorry: How Muay Thai taught me to stop apologising for everything - The Spinoff - June 30th, 2020
- Jordan Peterson: The activists are now stalking the hard scientists - National Post - June 24th, 2020
- Joe Rogan Is Asking For Heat With Latest Comments - TheThings - June 24th, 2020
- Alpha brains but beta minds: Tory culture is the main worry for true conservatives - The Conservative Woman - June 24th, 2020
- Amia Srinivasan He, She, One, They, Ho, Hus, Hum, Ita: How Should I Refer to You? LRB 2 July 2020 - London Review of Books - June 24th, 2020
- Clergy kneel to those who'd trample over them - The Conservative Woman - June 22nd, 2020
- Dave Rubin On Where Liberals And Conservatives Can Agree, And Can't - The Federalist - June 16th, 2020
- Five defensive players the Arizona Cardinals need to live up to expectations in 2020 - Revenge of the Birds - June 16th, 2020
- NFL stars deliver a message to the league: Admit you silenced us wrongly - Sporting News - June 6th, 2020
- On the Limits of Dave Rubins Cultural Politics - National Review - June 6th, 2020
- Jordan B. Peterson Health Update: Author Is Recovering ... - May 27th, 2020
- Jordan Peterson is back at work on his next book - May 27th, 2020
- Jordan Peterson on the Resurrection | Adrian Warnock - Patheos - May 27th, 2020
- Why Hungarys Viktor Orbn is the American rights favorite strongman - Vox.com - May 24th, 2020
- Patrick Peterson says 2020 Cardinals are, on paper, best team he has been on - Cards Wire - May 24th, 2020
- Graduation 2020: Westby Area High School - The Westby Times - May 24th, 2020
- Jonathan Kay: It takes a true artist to find new ways to shock the conscience. Kent Monkman has done that - National Post - May 24th, 2020
- The Irrelevance of the Intelligence Debate - Merion West - May 18th, 2020
- There are great stories about U.S. Open qualifiers; too bad we won't have any in 2020 - GolfDigest.com - May 18th, 2020
- Bob Holliday talks about the fun day when MJ and Buzz Peterson went golfing - WRALSportsFan.com - May 15th, 2020
- Mohamed and the Mountain | Annette Poizner | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - May 15th, 2020
- What Hating Jordan Peterson Tells You (about yourself) - The Times of Israel - May 6th, 2020
- Former Vol head coach appears in ESPNs The Last Dance - Vols Wire - May 6th, 2020
- What if Michael Jordan had signed with Adidas? He very nearly did, and it haunts Gary Stokan to this day - WRALSportsFan.com - May 6th, 2020
- Why is it always the white NFL players who get a second chance? - The Guardian - May 6th, 2020
- Another Piece on How Feminism Has Ruined Men - RushLimbaugh.com - May 6th, 2020
- Dave Rubin is out of ideas - Business Insider - Business Insider - May 6th, 2020
- Justin Amash could lead conservative reformation - Spring Hope Enterprise - May 2nd, 2020
- May Day! May Day! Is Government Out of Control? What It Means to Investors - Stock Investor - May 2nd, 2020
- Jordan Peterson and Carl Jung's Worldviews Have Been Greatly Oversimplified - Merion West - May 1st, 2020
- Dave Rubin Talks To Shapiro About Learning From Jordan Peterson On Tour - The Daily Wire - May 1st, 2020
- The one player Michael Jordan was scared of in college? Buzz Peterson details it - The Athletic - May 1st, 2020
- Russell Brand And Ricky Gervais Are Just What Your Brain Needs - The Federalist - May 1st, 2020
- The Problem with Edmund Burke and Defenders of Tradition - Merion West - May 1st, 2020
- FreedomFest Urges People to 'Catch the Vision' in Las Vegas - Right Wing Watch - May 1st, 2020
- Seminal Words and the Pregnant Pause | Annette Poizner - The Times of Israel - April 22nd, 2020
- Too Hot to Handle on Netflix is undeniably Sexy in Quarantine - The TeCake - April 22nd, 2020
- What Skeptical Scholars Admit about the Resurrect... - ChristianityToday.com - April 13th, 2020
- How Joe Rogan and Eric Weinstein Sinned - Thrive Global - April 7th, 2020
- Understanding the Viciousness of Jordan Peterson's Critics - Merion West - March 27th, 2020
- Rosie Huntington-Whiteley Has Mastered The Art Of Waist-Up Dressing - British Vogue - March 27th, 2020
- Five hours to change your life with Jordan Peterson - Patheos - March 27th, 2020
- If people stand up in the face of the things they are afraid of, they get stronger - The Indian Express - March 27th, 2020
- Prof still fighting school's demand to call he a 'she' - OneNewsNow - March 18th, 2020
- Patrick Peterson: Cardinals 'all in' this year and 'not done' - Cards Wire - March 18th, 2020
- Tips, links and suggestions: what are you reading this week? - The Guardian - March 18th, 2020
- What Happened to Jordan Peterson? - The New Republic - March 15th, 2020
- Inside the Treatment of Jordan Peterson - InsideHook - March 15th, 2020
- Christopher Booker: Groupthink review an uncritical history of political correctness - The Arts Desk - March 15th, 2020
- 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: Jordan B ... - March 9th, 2020
- The best recent poetry review roundup - The Guardian - March 9th, 2020
- Jordan Peterson Checks into Rehab Following Wife's Cancer ... - March 9th, 2020
- Jordan Peterson Wife: The Truth About Tammy Peterson - Who - February 28th, 2020
- Podcast giant Joe Rogan coming to Tampas Amalie Arena - Tampa Bay Times - February 28th, 2020
- Is Wall Street on the Brink of Disaster? - Stock Investor - February 28th, 2020
- The Travesty of Comparing Jordan Peterson to Hitler - Merion West - February 25th, 2020
- What Douglas Murray's Book Does Well (And Where It Falters) - Merion West - February 24th, 2020
- Jordan Peterson: the One Who Helped Me When I Most Needed It - Merion West - February 20th, 2020
- 'He could've killed somebody': Victim in Boise 11-car hit-and-run crash reacts to wild video - KTVB.com - February 20th, 2020
- A Controversial Study Claimed To Explain Why Women Dont Go Into Science And Tech. It Just Got A 1,113-Word Correction. - BuzzFeed News - February 20th, 2020
- Feb. 18: The story of Bombardier could have been easily avoided. Readers react to Bombardiers fortunes, facial recognition, Jordan Peterson, plus... - February 20th, 2020
- Meet the Petersons: the controversial family plagued by ill health - Telegraph.co.uk - February 20th, 2020
- Ex-benzodiazepine user relating to Peterson says withdrawal 'hell' needs awareness - The Chronicle Journal - February 20th, 2020
- Jordan Peterson enters rehab after wife's cancer diagnosis - February 9th, 2020
- Jordan Peterson recovering from tranquilizer addiction in Russia - New York Post - February 8th, 2020
- He nearly died several times: Controversial academic Jordan Peterson seeks to recover from addiction, daughter says - Toronto Star - February 8th, 2020