Category Archives: Bitcoin

Bitcoin’s Price Continues to Rise Analyst Says it’ll Reach $100000 in Next 10 Years – The Merkle

Kay Van-Petersen, the analyst who predicted the Bitcoin price going up to $2,000 now has another prediction, and this time, its even more astonishing. According to his newest prediction, the price of Bitcoin might even reach $100,000 during the next decade. If true, this newest prediction would mark a 3,483% rise.

This analysts first prediction was published back in December by Saxo Bank, and his report was even called Outrageous Predictions. Back then he said that the price of Bitcoin would go from $754 to $2,000. The report raised quite a few eyebrows, but then it happened, and Bitcoin hit the price on May 20. Now, however, the same analyst sees another big rise for the cryptocurrency.

Van-Petersen explains this rise like this. He assumes that cryptocurrencies (including Bitcoin) will account for 10% of their ADV (Average Daily Volumes) of fiat currency trade in the next 10 years. The ADV for the foreign exchange is over $5 trillion at the moment. Now, 10% of $5 trillion is $500 billion, which is the potential ADV for the cryptocurrencies.

Around 35% of the market share is expected to go to Bitcoin, which is around $175 billion from the total $500 billion figure. What that means is that around $175 billion in bitcoin would change hands per day.

Van-Petersens next suspicion is that the bitcoins market capitalization will get to be around 10 times larger than the average daily volume.

With that in mind, the market cap figure goes up to $1.75 trillion. On the other hand, the current figure is only $37.8 billion. Bitcoins limited supply is around $21 million, and the expectations are that this will be reached by the year 2140. However, when it comes to the next decade, its believed by this analyst that around 17 million will be circulating.

And finally, when this potential 17 million is divided by the estimated market cap ($1.75 trillion), then the price of Bitcoin goes somewhere around $100,000 by piece.

Many, including Van-Petersen himself say that this calculation is pretty rough. His calculations might even be called conservative, but hes sure that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies will survive the test of time. He firmly believes that cryptocurrencies arent going away and that two or three others will also rise and become the main ones. Bitcoin will remain among them. The analyst also stated that his views are not official views of the Saxo Bank.

Despite its sudden rise and popularity, Bitcoin isnt without problems. Most of them, including its bad reputation, come from the fact that its often used for illegal activities online. Also, theres the crash of Mt.Gox that happened in 2014, which was the biggest bitcoin exchange in the world, and many are still waiting for compensation.

This reputation was even confirmed recently, thanks to the WannaCry ransomware attack. The attackers demanded that their victims pay the price of $300 in Bitcoin. Bitcoin was only used because its hard to track, but its reputation still tooka big hit.

Van-Petersen believes that this industry is young enough to bounce back and improve its methods in time. Better online wallets and similar factors will improve its safety, as well as reputation. Plus, when buying the digital currency becomes easier in wider areas, its bound to get even more users.

Many believe that Van-Petersens calculations are too simple and that there are many other factors to take into consideration. All that can be done now is to wait and see whether this analyst got it right for the second time too.

If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and technology news.

See the rest here:
Bitcoin's Price Continues to Rise Analyst Says it'll Reach $100000 in Next 10 Years - The Merkle

Bitmain Responds to UASF With Another Bitcoin Hard Fork Announcement – Bitcoin Magazine

Major Bitcoin mining hardware producer Bitmain today announced that it may launch a hard fork in August. Labeled a contingency plan, this announcement is a response to the upcoming user activated hard soft fork (UASF), as defined by Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 148 (BIP148) and the wipe-out risk that comes along with it.

After an initial 8 megabyte proposal, Bitcoin Classic, the Hong Kong roundtable consensus, Bitcoin Unlimited, and SegWit2x, this marks the sixth time the Chinese mining giant has announced support for a hard fork in the space of two years.

Heres what their latest proposal looks like.

On August 1st, a segment of the Bitcoin community will activate the BIP148 UASF. These users and miners will only accept Bitcoin blocks that signal support for Segregated Witness (SegWit), the protocol upgrade proposed by the Bitcoin Core development team. If, at that point, a majority of miners (by hash power) does not signal support for SegWit through BIP148, Bitcoins blockchain and currency could split in two, resulting in a coin-split.

Now, with Bitmains hard fork announcement, it seems there could be a third part to the split sort of.

Bitmain refers to its announced hard fork as a UAHF or User Activated Hard Fork. While perhaps a clever play on UASF, this is not a very accurate term because the contingency plan will actually be very explicitly launched by Bitmain and Bitmain alone.

Moreover, use of the term hard fork is questionable in this context as well. Originally, at least, the term referred to a change to the Bitcoin protocol that makes previously invalid blocks or transactions valid. But for it to be a change to Bitcoins protocol, at the very least it arguably requires the Bitcoin ecosystem to follow these new rules.

Under Bitmains own stated condition this wouldnt be the case, at least not to the full extent. Rather, the UAHF will only be launched in response to a successful BIP148 UASF. It is thus more or less assumed that not everyone will adopt the new rules, which indeed seems likely. Technically, at least, Bitmains hard fork would be better described as the creation of an entirely new coin that shares a common history with Bitcoin.

For purposes of this article, Bitmains version of Bitcoin will therefore be called Bitmains Bitcoin.

So what. specifically, will Bitmains Bitcoin look like?

Bitmain announced it will create Bitmains Bitcoin exactly 12 hours and 20 minutes after the UASF activation, though this is configurable. At that specific point in time, under Bitmains new rules, a block must be included in the blockchain thats bigger than one megabyte. This will automatically split the chain or create a new chain depending on how you look at it. All existing full Bitcoin nodes would reject this block and ignore this chain, and would continue to follow the chain adhering to Bitcoins current consensus rules.

From that point on, Bitmain will first mine on Bitmains Bitcoin chain privately for three days. After these three days, Bitmain will officially launch Bitmains Bitcoin to the public if three circumstances are met.

First off, the BIP148 UASF must have been successful enough to have gained significant hash rate. Second, there must be strong market demand for Bitmains Bitcoin. And third, the non-BIP148 side of the split must be less than successful, comparatively.

Then, if launched, Bitmains Bitcoin will accept bigger blocks. The statement mentions an initial limit of up to 8 megabytes, though this is slightly ambiguous as the same blog post mentions there will be no hard-coded consensus rule at all. The hardware manufacturer does add that miners should impose a soft limit of less than 2 megabytes, which is really more like a recommendation. Additionally, Bitmain writes that there will be a new protocol limit on sigops, which, in short, should counter some potential attack vectors on bigger blocks that could otherwise significantly slow down propagation times.

For the longer term, Bitmain lays out a future roadmap that includes a version of Segregated Witness, Extension Blocks, Bitcoin NG, Lumio, Schnorr signatures, Weak Blocks, and Bitcoin Unlimited-inspired base block size increases up to almost 17 megabytes in two years. Overall, this future roadmap part of the announcement does not seem very concrete yet, however.

The good news is that anyone who holds bitcoins (meaning: their private keys) at the time of a split will receive coins on both sides of the chain. In other words, you will get free "Bitmain bitcoins", which you can keep, sell or spend as long as someone is willing to accept them as payment. Bitmain will even implement replay protection on Bitmains Bitcoin, which means that there should be no risk of accidentally spending the same (copied) coin on both chains.

From a broader Bitcoin and scaling perspective, the chances of BIP148s success may have actually increased, due to this announcement. If Bitmain follows through on their blog post, it means the company will take hash power that could have otherwise frustrated the UASF off the table, to mine on Bitmains Bitcoin chain. As a result, there is a greater chance that BIP148 miners will claim the longest chain versus non-BIP148 miners, avoiding a coin-split on the original blockchain. Additionally, Bitmains blog post seems to have angered some Bitcoin users that were so far undecided, further increasing support for BIP148.

The other scaling proposal in the running is SegWit2x, which is also supported by Bitmain. SegWit2x code should, according to its timeline, be up and running before August 1st. If that deadline is met, it may or may not prevent a coin-split in the first place, depending on its compatibility with the BIP148 UASF. But since this proposal has been mostly developed in private, the status of this project as well as its (in)compatibility with Bitmains contingency plan remains largely unclear.

And of course, in the end, it's possible that neither BIP148, nor SegWit2x, nor Bitmain's Bitcoin will gain much traction. Status quo could prevail, in which case not much would change at all.

Original post:
Bitmain Responds to UASF With Another Bitcoin Hard Fork Announcement - Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin needs government regulation to rise further, Morgan Stanley says – MarketWatch

Proponents of the digital currency bitcoin frequently cite its decentralized nature as one of the primary attributes that excites them about the technology. Meanwhile, bitcoin investors are no doubt thrilled with its rapid price appreciation, which has seen it nearly triple in 2017 alone.

According to Morgan Stanley, however, the latter group may not be able to see further gains unless the former gives up some of its autonomy.

The investment bank noted that the rapid appreciation of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, like ethereum, had elicited many inbound phone calls to both our banks and tech teams as the gains entice prospective investors and adopters. However, it added, governmental acceptance would be required for this to further accelerate, the price of which is regulation.

Cryptocurrencies as a category recently topped $100 billion in combined market capitalization, thanks to blindingly fast surges by bitcoin and ethereum, the two largest digital currencies.

Bitcoin BTCUSD, +1.37% rose 2.4% to $2,746.83 on Tuesday; recently, it hit an all-time high above $3,000. Ethereum fell 1.7% on Tuesday, but has seen an even bigger year-to-date rise than bitcoin. Both have seen spikes in trading volume.

Both the size and speed of bitcoins recent rally, as well as the recent pullback, has some investors wondering whether a longer-term downtrend is in store, even though one metrica kind of modified P/E ratio that has been developed by analystssuggests its valuation isnt currently at an extreme.

It is not clear why cryptocurrencies are appreciating so rapidly (apart from the appreciation itself drawing in more speculation against a potentially inefficient ability to sell), Morgan Stanley wrote, though it was skeptical that further gains could continue in the current regulatory environment.

Read: Bitcoin is up over 400% in the past yearwhats stopping it from going mainstream?

The investment bank didnt specify what types of regulation might be necessary to further push bitcoin higher, noting that the specific changes needed may be different for different cryptocurrencies, all of which use blockchain technology, the centralized ledger that records all such transactions. For blockchain overall, regulators are involved and watching closely, Morgan Stanley wrote. Some have suggested privacy could be improved. Regulators are looking to have a master key so all transactions are visible to them.

Blockchains are peer-to-peer networks that record and verify transactions, and while they were designed to be openmeaning anyone could see the history of various tradessome institutions have created private blockchains that arent publicly accessible.

Bank of New York Mellon Corp. BK, +0.96% for example, developed a blockchain-based platform for U.S. Treasury bond settlement that has been running internally since March 2016. The bank was unlikely to have involved regulators given [the] internal nature of the transaction, Morgan Stanley wrote. Bank of New York Mellon is planning to roll this service out to clients, but it will have to engage in dialogues [with regulators] if moving to commercial applications.

Bank of New York Mellon didnt immediately return requests for a comment.

Talk of regulation in bitcoin comes months after the SEC back in March rejected a proposal that would have led to the creation of bitcoin-focused exchange-traded funds, the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, citing a lack of. The SEC has since said they would review that decision. Meanwhile, a separate proposal Grayscale Bitcoin Investment Trust to begin trading on the New York Stock Exchanges ETF platform is still under review. Both events might provide the regulatory underpinning that could further legitimize the digital currency in the eyes of investors, as well as increase its liquidity.

Read this article:
Bitcoin needs government regulation to rise further, Morgan Stanley says - MarketWatch

Blockchain’s Got No ‘Killer App’ Yet, Says Morgan Stanley, Even as Bitcoin Soars – Barron’s


Barron's
Blockchain's Got No 'Killer App' Yet, Says Morgan Stanley, Even as Bitcoin Soars
Barron's
Morgan Stanley writes that Blockchain, the technology for an open, verifiable general ledger, is still in a "proof of concept" phase, and it may be several years before it is used in everyday practice for financial settlements. They see incumbents such ...
Morgan Stanley Says Bitcoin Needs Regulation to Keep RisingBloomberg

all 3 news articles »

Read more here:
Blockchain's Got No 'Killer App' Yet, Says Morgan Stanley, Even as Bitcoin Soars - Barron's

Ray Kurzweil Says He Wouldn’t Put His Money in Bitcoin but Doesn’t Dismiss Blockchain – Futurism

In Brief Renowned author, futurist, inventor and Google's head of engineering, Ray Kurzweil, spoke on his reticence to embrace bitcoin. He is not the only expert to have their qualms about the burgeoning digital currency.

Ray Kurzweil, a leading futurist, author, inventor, and the head of Googles engineering lab, has made some impressively accuratepredictions about the future. However, this may not be the best news for the burgeoning cryptocurrency, Bitcoin. Kurzweil spoke at the Exponential Finance Summit in New York City late last week and he had some less than flattering things to say about the currency. While he may see the value in the decentralizationof currency, he doesntfeel like Bitcoin is the way forward.

He explained:

Currencies like the dollar have provided reasonable stability. Bitcoin has not. And its not clear to me that the whole mining paradigm can provide that type of stability Weve seen tremendous instability with bitcoin, so I wouldnt put my money into it. I certainly do think there could be alternatives to national currencies emerging in the future. Algorithmic ones are a possibility, I just dont think weve arrived at the right algorithm yet.

Kurzweil is not the only high-profileBitcoin skeptic or opponent. Billionaire investor Mark Cubanspoke out about Bitcoin last week, denouncing it as a currency and discussing it as a bubble. Kurzweils comments echo these sentiments, especially with his view of the cryptocurrencys instability. However, Daniel Roberts from Yahoo! Financesees Kurzweils view of that instability as an oversimplification. When looked at in the long term, Bitcoin is showing steady gains.

Bitcoin has enjoyed a meteoric rise in recent weeks as prices have surpassed $3,000 (albeit briefly). In the first moments of 2017, Bitcoin could barely reach the $1,000 mark. As of today, the cryptocurrency stands at more than $2,550.

Bitcoin is powered by blockchain technology. A blockchain is a decentralized ledger that allows for complete anonymity, security, and transparencyfor all transactions taking place on the ledger. Kurzweil is more optimistic about blockchain, saying, I think once we can demonstrate confidence, then yes, a blockchain currency makes sense, and being able to document transactions securely, but theres a lot to work out.

In an effort to work out those kinks, many companies and even some countries are adopting blockchain technology. Some countries are even exploring switching their national currencies over to cryptocurrencies. We are in the early stages of its development, but this could go down as one of the few predictions Kurzweil gets wrong.

Continue reading here:
Ray Kurzweil Says He Wouldn't Put His Money in Bitcoin but Doesn't Dismiss Blockchain - Futurism

Raoul Pal: Bitcoin Is Mania And Not A Store of Value… I Sold-Out … – Forbes


Forbes
Raoul Pal: Bitcoin Is Mania And Not A Store of Value... I Sold-Out ...
Forbes
The price of Bitcoin has risen by 210% since March to over $2900 and one of the world's most successful investment strategists is warning investors to stay ...

and more »

See the rest here:
Raoul Pal: Bitcoin Is Mania And Not A Store of Value... I Sold-Out ... - Forbes

The State of Montana funds company working on a ‘bitcoin processing center.’ – Brave New Coin

In the first-ever reported case of a US State funding what looks to be a Bitcoin mining operation, Montanas Governor recently announced that $416,000 was awarded to a data center that provides blockchain security services for the bitcoin network.

Governor Steve Bullock recently announced $1,124,030 in economic development grants to assist Main Street businesses across Montana with creating 116 jobs, providing workforce training and developing plans for growth and expansion.

The funds are being awarded through the Big Sky Economic Development Trust Fund (BSTF) and the Primary Sector Workforce Training Grant (WTG) programs at the Department of Commerce, Office of Tourism and Business Development.

- The office of Montana Governor Steve Bullock

Very little information is available online about Project Spokane LLC, there is no website or contact information available online. However, third-party commercial business reports that list the company generally agree that Project Spokane LLC is a privately held company listed in Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Some listings states that the company has an annual revenue of $750,000 and employs a staff of approximately 6, with business launch dates all listed in early 2016. The company is often categorized under IT & Managed Service Providers, while at least one directory has Project Spokane featured under Service Management and Malware Remediation.

However, in July of 2016 Project Spokane LLC applied for a 7.2kV overhead power distribution line for a site in Montana, referred to as the old Bonner Mill Site. The application clarifies that the powerline is to serve a new bit coin processing center, which is to be located on a portion of the old mill site. The projects electrical requirements exceed the current electrical service onsite, states the application.

- Rights of Way Applications 17412

Bitcoin mining operations are power hungry businesses, and often run where power is cheap. According to the US federal Energy Information Administration, Montana has middle-of-the-road commercial electricity rates, averaging $10.04 per kilowatt-hour (kWh). That price puts it very close to the national median for the US.

However, in the county where Project Spokane is setting up shop, there is a local energy cooperative that charges large commercial installations as little as $0.0436 per kWh, which would make bitcoin mining extremely profitable.

For comparison, in Washington State, where John McAfee has set up the Bitcoin mine for MGT Capital, the industrial average is the lowest in the nation, $4.54 per kWh. McAfee has stated, however, that hes using a nearby hydroelectric dam to inexpensively generate the electricity and cool his mining equipment. His effective energy rate is still unknown.

- John McAfee

Although Montana is the first state to fund a Bitcoin company, a few other States have tried or run initiatives and programs to boost blockchain technology use. The first attempt was in 2015, when New Jersey attempted to launch the ambitious Digital Currency Jobs Creation Act, which was proposed to give Bitcoin and other digital currency businesses a tax break and attract them to the state. The program was formed in the wake of the infamous BitLicense across the river in New York. However, the bill has been introduced to the NJ Senate several times and failed to gain any traction.

Delaware also drafted a bill in 2015, which has passed the Senate but is being held up by the states legal review process. The state a popular destination for business incorporation, and wants to use a blockchain as the primary means to create and manage corporate records. The bill is expected to be enacted sometime this year.

In the meantime, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation announced the Illinois Blockchain Initiative in November. The initiative was created to investigate the benefits of Blockchains used at the state level. Secretary Bryan Schneider states that his department would like to educate ourselves on the technology as well as its societal, economic and legal implications. Learning about the technology before regulating it stated goal.

On the federal level, spending towards blockchain research has been an order of magnitude larger. In July 2015, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded US$3 million to the Initiative for Cryptocurrency and Contracts (IC3). The three-University initiative consists of a team from Cornell, the University of Maryland, and UC Berkeley. Focusing on smart contracts and developing new cryptocurrency systems that address pain points attributed to Bitcoin, the program is also helping to establish cryptocurrency as a prominent research area, and make a big impact in shaping the future of financial transactions and e-commerce, according to the principal investigator, Elane Shi.

In January of this year, the NSF started looking for teams to fund with as much as US$8.5 million. Solutions such as the introduction of blockchain technology are needed to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of data as it traverses multiple environments such as mobile, cloud, campus, and Internet networks, states the NSF.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has also been funding blockchain technology projects, to the tune of US$2.25 million so far. Through its Small Business Innovation Research program, the DHS has been learning about Blockchain Forensics, the method of tracking transactions and identifying relationships across the blockchain. BlockCypher is a forensics company, and the largest recipient of funds from the DHS to date. Ram laboratories has also received funding, as has a custom blockchain solutions provider called DigitalBazaar, and the identity solution Evernym.

Link:
The State of Montana funds company working on a 'bitcoin processing center.' - Brave New Coin

Bitcoin Will Make Many More Millionaires Before Diving – Forbes


Forbes
Bitcoin Will Make Many More Millionaires Before Diving
Forbes
Bitcoin has been flying high lately, making many investors overnight millionairesinvestors who poured money into the digital currency when it was trading at a tiny fraction of its current price. And it will make more millionaires, as it could reach ...
You can't hold a bitcoin, but the web currency's value has skyrocketed. Why?Phys.Org
3 Reasons Volatility Is Still a Serious Concern for Bitcoin InvestornewsBTC

all 6 news articles »

Read the rest here:
Bitcoin Will Make Many More Millionaires Before Diving - Forbes

Is bitcoin in a bubble? This metric suggests there’s more room to grow – MarketWatch

One of the biggest financial stories of 2017 has been the seemingly unstoppable rise of bitcoin, which has more than tripled this year and seems to make new records by the day.

Such a rally has inevitably raised questions over whether there is a bubble in the digital currency, or in the broader space of cryptocurrencies, which earlier this week topped $100 billion in combined market capitalization. Breaking that milestone was largely due to bitcoin BTCUSD, +3.83% which by itself accounts for nearly half the value of the still-nascent sector. However, a new measure of bitcoin valuation, one based roughly on the price-to-earnings ratio applied to stock valuation, suggests that rally still has room to grow.

Read: 3 reasons why bitcoins surge may not be a bubble

Opinion: Three reasons to fear the coming crash in bitcoins

Gauging whether bitcoin is overvalued is tricky, as it is divorced from many of the standard attributes that can measure a securitys fundamentals. Unlike a stock, bitcoin has neither traditional revenue nor profits behind it, ruling out such equity statistics as price to sales or earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization.

And because it isnt backed by a central bank or government, viewing it in the way one might a currency isnt an apples-to-apples comparison. A commodity like oil can be measured based on the principles of supply and demand; bitcoin has no equivalent underlying asset. (The Internal Revenue Service classifies bitcoin as property rather than a currency, while the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission classifies it as a commodity.)

However, some analysts have developed what could be considered a price-to-earnings ratio for bitcoin, one that suggests the recent surge may not have taken it to bubble territory.

Bitcoins P/E ratio looks at the digital currencys network valuethe number of outstanding bitcoins multiplied by price; this figure is currently $44.69 billionagainst its daily transaction volume.

The reason I call it a P/E ratio is because when I think about what a P/E signifies for equities, it is basically the function of market cap and earnings. The earnings are the underlying utilitythe cash flow of the company, explained Chris Burniske, a blockchain analyst at ARK Invest, who has helped to develop this metric.

Bitcoin P/E is composed of similar concepts. Instead of market cap, you have network value. Thats then divided by the underlying utility of bitcoin, which is its ability to move money. Thats bitcoins core utility, same as a companys core utility is earnings.

This metric currently gives bitcoin a ratio of roughly 50, which is under its long-term average and well below past peaks, which have been above 200, and one time spiked to nearly 450.

On a stock, a P/E ratio of 50 would be pricey, Burniske noted, but I dont know if it should be considered pricey for bitcoin. It looks to be in a comfortable range, it isnt an outlier and right now the broad takeaway I have is that it doesnt look like were due for a mean revision.

He added that over time, cryptocurrencies would find a base range for valuation on this metric, one that lets investors know what would be reasonable to pay based on the cryptos daily utility.

While high P/E ratios are often seen as sell signals for stocks, Burniske suggested that any kind of extreme reading on this metric could signal a bitcoin selloff.

This ratio drops when bitcoin is in the late stages of rallies, because investors would take profits or move their money between exchanges out of nervousness. That leads to a lot of transaction value, which makes the denominator higher. Thats why its important to me, from a valuation standpoint, that it isnt high or low.

Read the original here:
Is bitcoin in a bubble? This metric suggests there's more room to grow - MarketWatch

What Happens to Bitcoin After All 21 Million are Mined? | Investopedia – Investopedia

Bitcoin is like gold in many ways. Like gold, Bitcoin cannot simply be created arbitrarily. Gold must be mined out of the ground, and Bitcoin must be mined via digital means. Linked with this process is the stipulation set forth by the founders of Bitcoin that, like gold, it have a limited and finite supply. In fact, there are only 21 million Bitcoins that can be mined in total. Once miners have unlocked this many Bitcoins, the planet's supply will essentially be tapped out, unless Bitcoin's protocol is changed to allow for a larger supply. Supporters of Bitcoin say that, like gold, the fixed supply of the currency means that banks are kept in check and not allowed to arbitrarily issue fiduciary media. But what will happen when the global supply of Bitcoin reaches its limit?

It may seem that the group of individuals most directly effected by the limit of the Bitcoin supply will be the Bitcoin miners themselves. On one hand, there are detractors of the Bitcoin limitation who that say that miners will be forced away from the block rewards they receive for their work once the Bitcoin supply has reached 21 million in circulation. In this case, these miners may need to rely on transaction fees in order to maintain operations. Bitcoin.com points to an argument that miners will then find the process unaffordable, leading to a reduction in the number of miners, a centralization process of the Bitcoin network, and numerous negative effects on the Bitcoin system.

This argument assumes that transaction fees alone will be insufficient to keep Bitcoin miners financially solvent once the mining process has been completed. On the other hand, there are reasons to believe that transaction fees and mining costs will even out in the future. Looking ahead by several decades, it is not difficult to imagine that mining chips will become small and highly efficient. This would reduce the burden placed on miners and would allow mining to become an activity with a lower threshold of initial cost. Further, transaction fees may increase, and this could help to keep miners afloat as well.

Bitcoin has already seen massive hikes in price in just the past few months. While no one is entirely sure how Bitcoin will continue to spread to the larger financial world, it seems likely that a limited supply of the currency may cause prices to continue to increase. There are also stockpiles of inactive coins that are held around the world, the largest supply of which belongs to the person or group who founded Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. Perhaps this supply, consisting of roughly one million Bitcoins, is intentionally being saved for a time when the global supply is facing increased levels of demand.

Read the original post:
What Happens to Bitcoin After All 21 Million are Mined? | Investopedia - Investopedia