Category Archives: Internet Security

DDoS-Guard To Forfeit Internet Space Occupied by Parler Krebs on Security – Krebs on Security

Parler, the beleaguered social network advertised as a free speech alternative to Facebook and Twitter, has had a tough month. Apple and Google removed the Parler app from their stores, and Amazon blocked the platform from using its hosting services. Parler has since found a home in DDoS-Guard, a Russian digital infrastructure company. But now it appears DDoS-Guard is about to be relieved of more than two-thirds of the Internet address space the company leases to clients including the Internet addresses currently occupied by Parler.

The pending disruption for DDoS-Guard and Parler comes compliments of Ron Guilmette, a researcher who has made it something of a personal mission to de-platform conspiracy theorist and far-right groups.

In October, a phone call from Guilmette to an Internet provider in Oregon was all it took to briefly sideline a vast network of sites tied to 8chan/8kun a controversial online image board linked to several mass shootings and QAnon, the far-right conspiracy theory which holds that a cabal of Satanic pedophiles is running a global child sex-trafficking ring and plotting against President Donald Trump. As a result, those QAnon and 8chan sites also ultimately ended up in the arms of DDoS-Guard.

Much like Internet infrastructure firm CloudFlare, DDoS-Guard typically doesnt host sites directly but instead acts as a go-between to simultaneously keep the real Internet addresses of its clients confidential and to protect them from crippling Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks.

The majority of DDoS-Guards employees are based in Russia, but the company is actually incorporated in two other places: As Cognitive Cloud LLP in Scotland, and as DDoS-Guard Corp. based in Belize. However, none of the companys employees are listed as based in Belize, and DDoS-Guard makes no mention of the Latin American region in its map of global operations.

In studying the more than 11,000 Internet addresses assigned to those two companies, Guilmette found that approximately 66 percent of them were doled out to the Belize entity by LACNIC, the regional Internet registry for the Latin American and Caribbean regions.

Suspecting that DDoS-Guard incorporated in Belize on paper just to get huge swaths of IP addresses that are supposed to be given only to entities with a physical presence in the region, Guilmette filed a complaint with the Internet registry about his suspicions back in November.

Guilmette said LACNIC told him it would investigate, and that any adjudication on the matter could take up to three months. But earlier this week, LACNIC published a notice on its website that it intends to revoke 8,192 IPv4 addresses from DDoS-Guard including the Internet address currently assigned to Parler[.]com.

A notice of revocation posted by LACNIC.

LACNIC has not yet responded to requests for comment. The notice on its site says the Internet addresses are set to be revoked on Feb. 24.

DDoS-Guard CEO Evgeniy Marchenko maintains the company has done nothing wrong, and that DDoS-Guard does indeed have a presence in Belize.

They were used strongly according [to] all LACNIC policies by [a] company legally substituted in LACNIC region, Marchenko said in an email to KrebsOnSecurity. There is nothing illegal or extremist. We have employers and representatives in different countries around the world because we are global service. And Latin America region is not an exception.

Guilmette said DDoS-Guard could respond by simply moving Parler and other sites sitting in those address ranges to another part of its network. But he considers it a victory nonetheless that a regional Internet registry took his concerns seriously.

It appeared to me that it was more probable than not that they got these 8,000+ IPv4 addresses by simply creating an arguably fraudulent shell company in Belize and then going cap in hand to LACNIC, claiming that they had a real presence in the Latin & South American region, and then asking for 8,000+ IPv4 addresses, he said.So I reported my suspicions to the LACNIC authorities in early November, and as I have only just recently learned, the LACNIC authorities followed up diligently on my report and, it seems, verified my suspicions.

In October, KrebsOnSecurity covered another revelation by Guilmette about the same group of QAnon and 8chan-related sites that moved to DDoS-Guard: The companies that provided the Internet address space used by the sites were defunct businesses in the eyes of their respective U.S. state regulators. In other words, the American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) the non-profit which administers IP addresses for entities based in North America was well within its contract rights to revoke the IP space.

Guilmette brought his findings to ARIN, which declined to act on the complaint and instead referred the matter to state investigatory agencies.

Still, Guilmettes gadfly efforts to stir things up in the RIR community sometimes do pay off. For example, he spent nearly three years documenting how $50 million worth of the increasingly scarce IPv4 addresses were misappropriated from African companies to dodgy Internet marketing firms.

His complaints about those findings to the African Network Information Centre (AFRINIC) resulted in an investigation that led to the termination of a top AFRINIC executive, who was found to have quietly sold many of the address blocks for personal gain to marketers based in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

And this week, AFRINIC took the unusual step of officially documenting the extent of the damage wrought by its former employee, and revoking discrete chunks of address space currently being used by marketing firms.

In a detailed report released today (PDF), AFRNIC said its investigation revealed more than 2.3 million IPv4 addresses were without any lawful authority, misappropriated from AFRINICs pool of resources and attributed to organizations without any justification.

AFRINIC said it began its inquiry in earnest back in March 2019, when it received an application by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about certain suspicious activities regarding several IPv4 address blocks which it held. So far, AFRNINIC said it has reclaimed roughly half of the wayward IP address blocks, with the remainder yet to be reclaimed due to ongoing due diligence.

Tags: 8chan, 8kun, AFRINIC, ARIN, Cognitive Cloud LLP, DDoS-Guard Corp., Evgeniy Marchenko, fbi, LACNIC, Parler, QAnon, Ron Guilmette

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 21st, 2021 at 10:48 amand is filed under A Little Sunshine, Ne'er-Do-Well News.You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.You can skip to the end and leave a comment. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Read more here:
DDoS-Guard To Forfeit Internet Space Occupied by Parler Krebs on Security - Krebs on Security

How to improve Internet security and curb threats – Explica

Internet security is seriously threatened. The typical collection of malware, increasingly sophisticated and massive, has been joined in 2020 by all consequences of the COVID pandemic, a great challenge also in terms of cybersecurity.

And it is that the confinements due to the pandemic have displaced millions of employees and students from perimeter networks generally well protected to those of the most insecure homes by default. It has also increased disinformation, the fake news and in general the manipulation of the information that some analysts consider one more a problem of computer security.

Of course, it has not been lacking malware of all kinds, viruses, Trojans and specimens of all conditions and for all platforms. Cyber attacks are increasingly numerous, sophisticated, dangerous and massive with Ransomware and Phishing as the main threats. The data breaches and the right to privacy, and cyber espionage that does not rest, are also the order of the day and complete an explosive cocktail.

Therefore, the common user must adopt proactive measures to improve security. Achieving 100% security and privacy in a global network and in such a connected world is simply impossible, but we can increase protection by observing a series of tips that our very security colleagues have published and that we recommend.

They include the strengthening of online accounts, the use of operating systems and applications, equipment and networks. And common sense in the use of the Internet and its services. Prudence is one of the preferred barriers against malware And it is advisable to be extremely cautious against phishing or ransomware attacks, which as soon as we pay attention we can prevent, because to be effective they use precisely the carelessness of the user.

To do this, we must avoid installing applications from unsafe sites; the opening of unsolicited emails or attachments that arrive from social networks or messaging applications; browsing certain Internet pages; or using outdated operating systems and applications, which contain vulnerabilities that can be exploited by cybercriminals in malware campaigns.

You have the complete guide to help improve Internet security at very security.

View original post here:
How to improve Internet security and curb threats - Explica

Defense More Effective Than Offense to Curb Nation State Threat Actors – Infosecurity Magazine

The effectiveness of offensive capabilities in deterring nation state actors was discussed by a panel during the recent RSAC 365 Innovation Showcase: Cyber Deterrence webinar.

Chair of the session, Jonathan Luff, co-founder at Cylon, observed that now is the ideal time to be asking if and when offensive strikes should be used following the Russian state-backed SolarWinds attacks at the end of last year, as well as the inauguration of newly-elected President Joe Biden this week. Luff noted: The new administration has already made clear it intends to make cyber a huge priority.

Ciaran Martin, former CEO at the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) in the UK, began by arguing that while offensive cyber-actions can be useful against certain types of enemies, theywill not deter incidents like SolarWinds. He highlighted the UKs successful cyber-strikes against the Islamic State back in 2018, which hindered its operations and made it harder for itto radicalize people online. However, he does not believe it would have such a positive effect in preventing cyber-attacks emanating from countries such as Russia and China. If you knock off the six oclock news in Moscow whos that going to deter? he asked.

He added that the nature of the threat China poses to the West is different to that of Russia, with its bid for technological supremacy an existential danger. This means there is now a clash between societies with free and open technologies and those that are authoritarian. Martin commented: You certainly dont counter that with cyber-attacks or by Trumpian sanctions; you counter it by innovation.

Sian John, EMEA director, cybersecurity policy at Microsoft, said that the tech giants main priority in dealing with the cyber-threats posed is innovating around threat, detection and response capabilities. Were definitely on the defense side of that approach, she added. More broadly, to keep the free and open internet secure, she highlighted the importance of tech companies collaborating more closely to try and get ahead of the threat.

The panel agreed that the role of cybersecurity startups will be vital in the development of more innovative defensive solutions going forward. Itxaso del Palacio, partner at investment firm Norton Capital, believes the challenges to organizations posed by the rapid shifts to home working and adoption of the cloud has increased the importance of startups in this space. This has, in turn, already led to more innovative solutions becoming available. That has accelerated the need to manage and monitor these multi-cloud solutions, she stated.

Concluding the discussion, the panellists offered reasons for positivity in relation to making the open internet more secure over the coming decade. Theseincludean increased focus by security companies on tackling the evolving ransomware threat and the use of automation to detect dangers quickly. More generally, John said she is really excited by the move to build privacy and security in by design rather than it being a bolt on.

Here is the original post:
Defense More Effective Than Offense to Curb Nation State Threat Actors - Infosecurity Magazine

Parler Was Hacked on WordPress, The Internets Biggest Platform. Is Everyone At Risk? – Observer

Parler, the Twitter rip-off that served as one of the main organizing tools for the Donald Trump fanaticswho stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, has been largely offline for more than a week. But even in suspended animation, the preferred online home for QAnon, the Proud Boys, and other elements of the American far-right is still creating trouble.

Decisions by Amazon, Apple, and Google to quit hosting the site and forbid mobile users to download the app have triggered cries of Big Tech censorship. First Amendment and internet regulation politics aside, the way Parler gushed data on its way out the door raises serious cybersecurity questions as well as worries about whether other players on the internet have data breaches in their future.

Though its impossible to verify without peeking under Parlers hooda task now impossible since the website is offlinethe prevailing narrative is that a Parler security flaw (or flaws) allowed a white-hat hacker to download and archive all of Parlers user data shortly before Amazon Web Services pulled the plug on hosting the site. Among the data presented for the public (and law enforcement) to access included, in some cases, potentially incriminating location data.

Parler relied on Worpress, the worlds most-used content management system. That has led to speculation that WordPress was part of the flaw and that anyone else using WordPress was in danger. However, according to a general consensus of cybersecurity experts, including several contacted for this article, Parlers data breach didnt happen simply because Parler used WordPress. Instead, Parlers user data leaked because CEO John Matze and the sites architects left major flaws in Parlers API, the link between Parlers front-end and its user data.

See Also: Elon Musk Blames Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg For Capitol Riot

The predominant belief is that Parler was a rushed, poor design buoyed by right-leaning investors to become pretty large before they really had built a solid foundation, technologically speaking, Andrew Zolides, a professor of communications at Xavier University who teaches courses in digital design told Observer. (Among Parlers investors are the right-wing billionaire Rebekah Mercer, who tried to capitalize on right-wing anger at Twitter and Facebook to grow Parlers audience.)

While any website has its privacy concerns, Parler seems like an issue of getting too big, too fast and not having the ability or technical know-how to actually prepare for that, Zolides added.

In a welcome development for anyone concerned about anonymity or security in general, other websites can avoid the Parler trap provided they arent relatively new and small startups who try to compete with established giants like Twitter and Facebook, which is exactly what Parler did.

Yes, Parler could have been better designed, but realistically speaking, this is the kind of problem that happens when youre competing against mature companies that have invested billions and billions of dollars into their products, said Joseph Steinberg, a security expert and author of Cybersecurity for Dummies. Youre going to have a hard time designing everything that you want in a secure fashion.

First, the method for the alleged hack. Before Parler was yanked from AWS, a Twitter user with the handle @donk_enby figured out how to download the websites user dataall of which, along with whatever other very public evidence of Parler users breaching the Capitol, assaulting officers, and plotting further violence, was potentially very incriminating, as Gizmodo reported.

@donk_enby eventually snagged 56 terabytes worth of data: photos, videos, and text posts, many of which included some GPS metadata that positively put Parler users in and around the Capitol on January 6, including in secured areas. At least some of this data56,000 gigabyteshas been used to identify and apprehend riot participants, according to federal affidavits, but theres no proof positive that the feds used @donk_envys data tranche.

But how was it done? Early speculation buzzed that @donk_enby or another hacker may have stolen Parler admin credentials, which would be an illegal act. The accepted theory is that, as The Startup reported and several security experts have outlined, instead, Parlers own API was used against it to archive the websites dataand to do so quickly.

Parlers designers didnt restrict access to the API by requiring authentication. Users did not need specific credentials to access the data on the back end. That left an enormous back door open.

Most websites aware of basic security protocol dont allow access to the API without some form of user authentication to ensure the request isnt malicious. As The Startup pointed out, two common authentication solutions are API keys and tokens, both of which require some valid credentials that also allow the website to know whos accessing the data.

No authentication requirement left a door ajar. On top of that, Parlers designers didnt bother to add a second layer of defense in the way of rate-limitingmeaning instead of a door ajar or left cracked, the door was wide open.

Rate-limiting caps how much data a user can access regardless of credentials. Web users may have seen 429 Too Many Request error messages out in the wild, which is a sign that there have been too many knocks or attempts to pass through the door. Parler didnt have this, either, which meant that once the unsecured back end was accessed, @donk_enby was also able to archive Parlers data within 48 hours. (Oddly enough, as The Startup pointed out, Amazon Web Service has a basic firewall option that Parler didnt seem to bother with.)

Finally, Parler also allowed posts its users believed were deleted to be both available and easily discovered once someone was in the back end. In the aftermath of the deadly riots, some Parler users, aware of the reams of evidence available on the web, encouraged others to delete their posts from January 6.

All of Parlers posts were given sequential numbers that increased by 1. Even when those posts were deleted by the user, they remained on the back end. @donk_enby apparently needed to write only a very basic script that found and archived each post, one by one. And since Parler didnt bother removing geo-tagged data from photos and videos and posts before they were uploaded, that information was also sitting there waiting to be archived.

Its possible that other websites that use WordPress or other hosting software altogether may have similar security flaws, but they also might not be infamous enough to have those security flaws become the interest of vigilante hackers and thus be breached.

It is not uncommon for websites to have security flaws, sometimes significant ones, that go unnoticed because they are not popular enough to draw more than simple, often automated, attempts to compromise them, said Erich Kron, a security expert with KnowBe4, a prominent security solutions firm. When the site becomes popular quickly, the focus and complexity of these tests increase, often leading to vulnerabilities being discovered.

One recent example of this phenomenon, Kron said, was Zoom. When the COVID-19 pandemic made all work remote work, Zooms previously undetected security flaws were discovered, exploited, and then quickly patched. But with Parler, when security vendors started ditching their erstwhile client, it left Parler vulnerable at a time they were also a target of attackers, hacktivists and others, Kron added.

Parler isnt dead quite yet. Over the weekend, some version of Parler returned on the same web servers that host other fringe sites welcoming hate speech. As of Tuesday evening, the sites homepage is a technical difficulties landing page; site founder John Matze told Fox News the website plans to be fully functional by the end of the month (though mobile users will likely be stuck using the web-based version instead of an app). And there are other homes for the online far-rightthough, as Zolides pointed out, free-speech focused forums like Gab have been more proactive with content moderation than Parler.

More details may yet emerge on exactly how @donk_enby accessed Parlers data and whether the open-door theory was exactly what happened. (And standing separate from the cybersecurity question are issues of ethics; breach or hack, Parlers user data was still stolen, as Steinberg said, and a heist is nothing to celebrate.)

Assuming Parlers data was done in by bad design, for now, the online story of January 6 is one of repeated self-incrimination: unmasked rioters wandering the US Capitol, gleefully and openly discussing their foiled additional plans, posting incriminating evidence to the internet all the while, to a website that was not prepared to keep that evidence anonymous or secure.

The rest is here:
Parler Was Hacked on WordPress, The Internets Biggest Platform. Is Everyone At Risk? - Observer

VirnetX Submits Agreed Bill of Costs and Prejudgement Interest of $75.7 Million in Apple Suit – PRNewswire

ZEPHYR COVE, Nev., Jan. 21, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --VirnetX Holding Corporation (NYSE: VHC), an Internet security software and technology company, announced today that jt has submitted an Agreed Bill of Costs and Prejudgement Interest in the amount of $75,701,763.18 in connection with the previously announced $502,848,847 jury verdict against Apple in VirnetX Inc., et al. v. Apple Inc., No. 6:12-CV-00855. With the addition of these costs and prejudgement interest, the final judgment in VirnetX's favor for Apple infringing devices sold in the U.S. now totals $578,550,610. Post-trial interest, supplemental damages and the total amount of the $0.84 ongoing royalty per infringing Apple device have yet to be determined.

The parties have met and conferred and have reached agreements on these amounts. Apple has had the opportunity to review this filing and does not dispute the figures listed or that the calculations are agreed, subject to Apple's right to appeal the District Court's award of costs and prejudgment interest.

On March 13, 2020, VirnetX was paid a $454,033,859 judgment in a separate case against Apple.

About VirnetX

VirnetX Holding Corporation is an Internet security software and technology company with patented technology for secure communications including 4G LTE and 5G security. The Company's software and technology solutions, including its secure domain name registry and Gabriel Connection Technology, are designed to facilitate secure communications and to create a secure environment for real-time communication applications such as instant messaging, VoIP, smart phones, e-Readers and video conferencing. The Company's patent portfolio includes over 190 U.S. and foreign granted patents/validations and pending applications. For more information, please visit http://www.virnetx.com/.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this press release that are not statements of historical or current fact, including the statement regarding the Company's final judgment in VirnetX Inc., et al. v. Apple Inc., No. 6:12-CV-00855, may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections, and certain assumptions made by management and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other unknown factors that could cause the actual results of the Company to be materially different from the historical results or from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to,including but not limited to (1) the outcome of any legal proceedings that have been or may be initiated by the Company or that may be initiated against the Company, including potential appeals of the final judgment and pending and future inter partes review proceedings in the Patent and Trademark Office and appeals therefrom; (2) the ability to capitalize on patent portfolio and generate licensing fees and revenues; (3) the ability of the Company to be successful in entering into licensing relationships with its targeted customers on commercially acceptable terms, including in Japan; (4) potential challenges to the validity of the Company's patents underlying its licensing opportunities; (5) the ability of the Company to achieve widespread customer adoption of the Company's Gabriel Communication Technology and its secure domain name registry; (6) the level of adoption of the 3GPP Series 33 security specifications; (7) whether or not the Company's patents or patent applications may be determined to be or become essential to any standards or specifications in the 3GPP LTE, SAE project or otherwise; (8) the extent to which specifications relating to any of the Company's patents or patent applicationsmay beadopted as a final standard, if at all; and (9) the possibility that Company may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and/or competitive factors. The forward-looking statements contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties that are described from time to time in the Company's reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those under the heading "Risk Factors" in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 6, 2020 and subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as applicable. Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of the subject matter of this press release are beyond the Company's ability to control or predict. Except as required by law, the Company is under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this press release to conform to actual results.

Contact:Investor RelationsVirnetX Holding Corporation415.505.0456[emailprotected]

SOURCE VirnetX Holding Corporation

http://www.virnetx.com

Link:
VirnetX Submits Agreed Bill of Costs and Prejudgement Interest of $75.7 Million in Apple Suit - PRNewswire

China, Indonesia boost cooperation on cyber security and technology – Khmer Times

China and Indonesia have signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on developing capacity building of internet security and tech cooperation, marking the first-of-its-kind internet security agreement China signed with a foreign country, local media reported.

The MoU, which will provide a framework for cooperation in developing cyber security capacity and technology, is signed during Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yis official visit to Indonesia, according to a statement on the website of Chinas Foreign Ministry on Wednesday.

During Wangs meeting with Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan, Indonesias Coordinator for Cooperation with China, Wang noted that both countries should jointly uphold digital security and create a shared community focused on cyber security, the statement noted.

According to the MoU, between the National Cyber and Crypto Agency of Indonesia and the Cyberspace Administration of China, the participants would uphold the principle of respect for state sovereignty on cyber space and work together to promote the establishment of a multilateral, democratic and transparent international Internet governance system, data security, and the building of a peaceful, secure, open, cooperative, responsible, and orderly cyberspace as well as ICT development.

The cyber security expert of the Indonesian Cyber Research Institute for Communication and Information Systems Security Research Center (CISSReC), Pratama Persadha, said that cooperation between Indonesia and China in the field of internet security and technology is the right step as long as it is mutually beneficial. Moreover, China is currently recognized as one of the leading countries in developing 5G networks through a number of technology companies.

Pratama said In principle, Indonesia must be able to act neutral because there must be pressure from the US. As a sovereign country Indonesia is certainly free to cooperate with anyone as long as it benefits the people. Pratama hopes that there will be an acceleration in the development of internet network infrastructure, especially since Indonesia already has an internet backbone, namely the Palapa Ring. With the addition of Huaweis 5G technology, he said, this could accelerate the development of 5G infrastructure in the country. He gave an example, how China built Shenzhen as a city that applies 5G technology well.

Meanwhile, IT expert Onno W Purbo said it was no problem that Indonesia was cooperating with China. Most importantly, he said, Indonesia must remain independent. We can work together, but dont depend on other countries, including the US, Europe and China. Indonesia tries to be independent by at least producing its own technology, said Onno.

Industry analysts expected the deal to cement mutual trust in internet security, including terms on mutual telecom market openness and most importantly, on pledges that a country wont ask its firms to provide any backdoor to seize intelligent information of the other nation.

With a GDP of about $1 trillion, Indonesia is the largest economy in Southeast Asia and its move could carry certain level of impact on the other SEA countries. This agreement will likely attract more economically neutral SEA nations to follow, analysts said.

The deal with Indonesia on cyber security will set an example for other SEA economies, especially given the backdrop of closer economic ties between China and SEA nations that benefit both sides, Ma Jihua, a veteran industry analyst, told the Global Times.

Original post:
China, Indonesia boost cooperation on cyber security and technology - Khmer Times

Internet Security Software Market Incredible Possibilities, Growth with Industry Study, Detailed Analysis and Forecast to 2026 NeighborWebSJ -…

Latest Study on Industrial Growth ofGlobal Internet Security Software Market2019-2025. A detailed study accumulated to offerLatest insights about acute features of the Internet Security Software market. The report contains different market predictions related to market size, revenue, production, CAGR, Consumption, gross margin, price, and other substantial factors. While emphasizing the key driving and restraining forces for this market, the report also offers a complete study of the future trends and developments of the market. It also examines the role of the leading market players involved in the industry including their corporate overview, financial summary and SWOT analysis.

The Major Players Covered in this Report: Symantec, McAfee, Trend Micro, AVG, Avast Software, ESET, Bitdefender, Fortinet, F-Secure, G DATA Software, Avira, Qihoo 360, Kaspersky, Panda Security, Quick Heal, Comodo, Microsoft, Rising, Cheetah Mobile & AhnLab

Internet Security Software Market Study guarantees you to remain / stay advised higher than your competition. With Structured tables and figures examining the Internet Security Software, the research document provides you a leading product, submarkets, revenue size and forecast to 2025. Comparatively is also classifies emerging as well as leaders in the industry.

Click To get SAMPLE PDF (Including Full TOC, Table & Figures)

This study also covers company profiling, specifications and product picture, sales, market share and contact information of various regional, international and local vendors of Global Internet Security Software Market. The market opposition is frequently developing greater with the rise in scientific innovation and M&A activities in the industry. Additionally, many local and regional vendors are offering specific application products for varied end-users. The new merchant applicants in the market are finding it hard to compete with the international vendors based on reliability, quality and modernism in technology.

This report focuses on the global Internet Security Software status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players. The study objectives are to present the Internet Security Software development in United States, Europe and China.

Read Detailed Index of full Research Study at @https://www.htfmarketreport.com/reports/1603538-global-internet-security-software-market-4

The titled segments and sub-section of the market are illuminated below:

In-depth analysis of Global Internet Security Software market segments by Types: , Linux, Macintosh OS & Microsoft Windows

In-depth analysis of Global Internet Security Software market segments by Applications: Individual Users, Enterprise Users & Government Users

Major Key Players of the Market: Symantec, McAfee, Trend Micro, AVG, Avast Software, ESET, Bitdefender, Fortinet, F-Secure, G DATA Software, Avira, Qihoo 360, Kaspersky, Panda Security, Quick Heal, Comodo, Microsoft, Rising, Cheetah Mobile & AhnLab

Regional Analysis for Global Internet Security Software Market:North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy)Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia)South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia etc.)Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

Furthermore, the years considered for the study are as follows:Historical year 2013-2017Base year 2018Forecast period** 2018 to 2023 [** unless otherwise stated]

**Moreover, it will also include the opportunities available in micro markets for stakeholders to invest, detailed analysis of competitive landscape and product services of key players.

Buy this research report @https://www.htfmarketreport.com/buy-now?format=1&report=1603538

Guidance of the Global Internet Security Software market report:

Detailed considerate of Internet Security Software market-particular drivers, Trends, constraints, Restraints, Opportunities and major micro markets. Comprehensive valuation of all prospects and threat in the Global Internet Security Software market. In depth study of industry strategies for growth of the Internet Security Software market-leading players. Internet Security Software market latest innovations and major procedures. Favorable dip inside Vigorous high-tech and market latest trends remarkable the Market. Conclusive study about the growth conspiracy of Internet Security Software market for forthcoming years.

What to Expect from this Report On Internet Security Software Market:

1. A comprehensive summary of several area distributions and the summary types of popular products in the Internet Security Software Market.2. You can fix up the growing databases for your industry when you have info on the cost of the production, cost of the products, and cost of the production for the next future years.3. Thorough Evaluation the break-in for new companies who want to enter the Internet Security Software Market.4. Exactly how do the most important companies and mid-level companies make income within the Market?5. Complete research on the overall development within the Internet Security Software Market that helps you elect the product launch and overhaul growths.

Enquire for customization in Report @https://www.htfmarketreport.com/enquiry-before-buy/1603538-global-internet-security-software-market-4

Detailed TOC of Internet Security Software Market Research Report-

Internet Security Software Introduction and Market Overview Internet Security Software Market, by Application [Individual Users, Enterprise Users & Government Users]

Internet Security Software Industry Chain Analysis Internet Security Software Market, by Type [, Linux, Macintosh OS & Microsoft Windows]

Industry Manufacture, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2013-2018) Industry Value ($) by Region (2013-2018)

Internet Security Software Market Status and SWOT Analysis by Regions

Major Region of Internet Security Software Marketi) Global Internet Security Software Salesii) Global Internet Security Software Revenue & market share Major Companies List Conclusion

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia.

About Author:HTF Market Report is a wholly owned brand of HTF market Intelligence Consulting Private Limited. HTF Market Report global research and market intelligence consulting organization is uniquely positioned to not only identify growth opportunities but to also empower and inspire you to create visionary growth strategies for futures, enabled by our extraordinary depth and breadth of thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist you for making goals into a reality. Our understanding of the interplay between industry convergence, Mega Trends, technologies and market trends provides our clients with new business models and expansion opportunities. We are focused on identifying the Accurate Forecast in every industry we cover so our clients can reap the benefits of being early market entrants and can accomplish their Goals & Objectives.Contact US :Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)HTF Market Intelligence Consulting Private LimitedUnit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJNew Jersey USA 08837Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218[emailprotected]Connect with us atLinkedIn|Facebook|Twitter

https://neighborwebsj.com/

Read the original:
Internet Security Software Market Incredible Possibilities, Growth with Industry Study, Detailed Analysis and Forecast to 2026 NeighborWebSJ -...

Global Internet Security Market 2020: To Witness Growth Owing To Changing Standard of Living Analysis & Rise In Working Population Forecast Till…

The report highlights on quintessential facets of the Internet Security market such as impact of the global pandemic and followed by a tentative profit generation graph to suit reader interests and justify future centric business decisions.

The report is a well researched and articulated point of reference suggestive of innate factors such as Internet Security market size and dimensional readiness with in-depth assessment of sales performance and scope for further reforms, in terms of gross market valuation.

Further in the report progression graph this well conceived report highlighting vital milestones of the market also critically focuses on novel ways for current opportunity enhancement, besides unravelling novel ways to identify untapped ones.

Request a sample of this report @ https://www.orbisresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/3199388?utm_source=R0h!t

This study covers following key players:

HPEIBMIntelSymantecAlienVaultBlackStratusCheck Point Software TechnologiesCiscoCyrenFortinetF-SecureGemaltoKaspersky LabMicrosoftPalo Alto NetworksRSASophosTrend MicroTrustwave HoldingsWurldtech Security Technologies

Thorough Analysis of Regional Expanse

This well composed research report also portrays the potential of multiple segments prevalent in the global Internet Security market in growth enablement.

Vendor Profiling Guide

Access Complete Report @ https://www.orbisresearch.com/reports/index/global-internet-security-market-size-status-and-forecast-2019-2025?utm_source=R0h!t

Market segment by Type, the product can be split intoMalicious softwareDenial-of-service attacksPhishingApplication vulnerabilities

Market segment by Application, split intoGovernmentBanking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI)ManufacturingInformation communication and technology (ICT)RetailHealthcare

Regional Expanse: Global Internet Security Market: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa

Key Takeaways from the Report

For Enquiry before buying report @ https://www.orbisresearch.com/contacts/enquiry-before-buying/3199388?utm_source=R0h!t

Table of Contents:

Chapter One: Report Overview1.1 Study Scope1.2 Key Market Segments1.3 Players Covered1.4 Market Analysis by Type1.4.1 Global Internet Security Market Size Growth Rate by Type (2014-2025)1.4.2 Vision systems1.4.3 Cameras1.5 Market by Application1.5.1 Global Internet Security Market Share by Application (2014-2025)1.5.2 Material handling1.5.3 Welding and soldering1.5.4 Dispensing1.5.5 Assembling and disassembling1.6 Study Objectives1.7 Years Considered

Chapter Two: Global Growth Trends2.1 Internet Security Market Size2.2 Internet Security Growth Trends by Regions2.2.1 Internet Security Market Size by Regions (2014-2025)2.2.2 Internet Security Market Share by Regions (2014-2019)2.3 Industry Trends2.3.1 Market Top Trends2.3.2 Market Drivers2.3.3 Market Opportunities

Chapter Three: Market Share by Key Players3.1 Internet Security Market Size by Manufacturers3.1.1 Global Internet Security Revenue by Manufacturers (2014-2019)3.1.2 Global Internet Security Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2014-2019)3.1.3 Global Internet Security Market Concentration Ratio (CRChapter Five: and HHI)3.2 Internet Security Key Players Head office and Area Served3.3 Key Players Internet Security Product/Solution/Service3.4 Date of Enter into Internet Security Market3.5 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

Chapter Four: Breakdown Data by Type and Application4.1 Global Internet Security Market Size by Type (2014-2019)4.2 Global Internet Security Market Size by Application (2014-2019)Continued

About Us:Orbis Research (orbisresearch.com) is a single point aid for all your market research requirements. We have vast database of reports from the leading publishers and authors across the globe. We specialize in delivering customized reports as per the requirements of our clients. We have complete information about our publishers and hence are sure about the accuracy of the industries and verticals of their specialization. This helps our clients to map their needs and we produce the perfect required market research study for our clients.

Contact Us:Hector CostelloSenior Manager Client Engagements4144N Central Expressway,Suite 600, Dallas,Texas 75204, U.S.A.Phone No.: +1 (972)-362-8199; +91 895 659 5155Email ID:[emailprotected]

https://neighborwebsj.com/

Continued here:
Global Internet Security Market 2020: To Witness Growth Owing To Changing Standard of Living Analysis & Rise In Working Population Forecast Till...

8 Cool IoT Sensors And Devices That Stole The Show At CES 2021 – CRN

For Security, Home Health Monitoring, Access Control And More

The Internet of Things was alive and kicking at this years CES, even with the absence of physical venues in which these things are typically seen and experienced.

While smart home devices were aplenty at CES 2021, there were also just a lot of cool IoT devices and IoT sensors in general at the virtual show, and that includes both components meant to go inside other devices and products that are meant for use right out of the box.

[Related: The Coolest Wearable Technologies Making Waves At CES 2021]

Among the coolest IoT devices and sensors were a glowing IoT gateway supporting hand gestures, mini security sensors and other kinds of connected devices that can be used for a multitude of reasons, from access control to home health monitoring.

What follows are eight cool IoT sensors and devices that stole the show at this years CES.

More here:
8 Cool IoT Sensors And Devices That Stole The Show At CES 2021 - CRN

China, Indonesia to strengthen cooperation in developing cyber security capacity and technology – Prothom Alo English

According to the MoU, between the National Cyber and Crypto Agency of Indonesia and the Cyberspace Administration of China, the participants would uphold the principle of respect for state sovereignty on cyber space and work together to promote the establishment of a multilateral, democratic and transparent international Internet governance system, data security, and the building of a peaceful, secure, open, cooperative, responsible, and orderly cyberspace as well as ICT development.

The cyber security expert of the Indonesian Cyber Research Institute for Communication and Information Systems Security Research Center (CISSReC), Pratama Persadha, said that cooperation between Indonesia and China in the field of internet security and technology is the right step. Moreover, China is currently recognized as one of the leading countries in developing 5G networks through a number of technology companies.

Meanwhile, IT expert Onno W Purbo said it was no problem that Indonesia was cooperating with China. Most importantly, he said, Indonesia must remain independent. We can work together, but don't depend on other countries, including the US, Europe and China. Indonesia tries to be independent by at least producing its own technology," said Onno.

Industry analysts expected the deal to cement mutual trust in internet security, including terms on mutual telecom market openness, and prevention of information theft.

With a GDP of about $1 trillion, Indonesia is the largest economy in Southeast Asia and its move could carry certain level of impact on the other SEA countries. This agreement will likely attract more economically neutral SEA nations to follow, analysts said.

Read the original here:
China, Indonesia to strengthen cooperation in developing cyber security capacity and technology - Prothom Alo English