Category Archives: Bitcoin
How The Attacks On Farming And Bitcoin Are Connected – Bitcoin Magazine
This is an opinion editorial by Kudzai Kutukwa, a passionate financial inclusion advocate who was recognized by Fast Company magazine as one of South Africas top-20 young entrepreneurs under 30.
Our society today is plagued by a trust problem. The institutions that govern our world are built on trust while they have now proven to be untrustworthy. On February 11, 2009, Satoshi Nakamoto posted a thread stating,
I've developed a new open source P2P e-cash system called Bitcoin. It's completely decentralized, with no central server or trusted parties, because everything is based on crypto proof instead of trust. [] The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that's required to make it work. The central bank must be trusted not to debase the currency, but the history of fiat currencies is full of breaches of that trust. Banks must be trusted to hold our money and transfer it electronically, but they lend it out in waves of credit bubbles with barely a fraction in reserve.
By developing a decentralized monetary system that made trusted third parties (the banking system) obsolete, Nakamoto also chipped away at the source of their power: the money printer. Its the money printer that made it possible for a small clique of central bankers to centralize and seize control of the global monetary system. Though waning, they continue to wield this power to this day.
The top-down, centralized decision-making structure is not unique to central banking, but it pervades all spectra of the political institutions that govern our society today. The World Economic Forum (WEF), the Bank of International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the U.S. Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank and the United Nations are but a few examples of the central planners of our day responsible for setting policy recommendations and regulatory frameworks that range from interest rates to carbon emissions. While, for the most part, these organizations are credible and trustworthy, more often than not, the policy recommendations they make create more harm than good when implemented at the community level. A recent example of this would be Sri Lanka, which is not only bankrupt, but is also experiencing hyperinflation and shortages of basic essentials such as food, fuel and medicine.
While this economic collapse was caused by numerous factors; one of the biggest factors behind Sri Lankas demise is its support for the current thing, i.e., prioritizing ESG compliance over food production. The megazord acronym ESG is the brainchild of the U.N. and stands for environmental, social and governance. Its meant to be a set of investment criteria that guide corporations and governments to further develop sustainable investments. Sri Lanka has an exceptional ESG score of 98 that trumps that of both Sweden (96) and the US (51). In order to achieve their ESG-inspired, virtue-signaling goal of being the first organic country, the government abruptly banned the use of chemical fertilizers in April 2021. This led to a dramatic drop in yields across the board and by the time the government realized their blunder and tried reversing course in November 2021, the damage had already been done.
According to environmental activist Michael Shellenberger,
[O]ne-third of Sri Lankas farm lands were dormant in 2021 due to the fertilizer ban. Over 90% of Sri Lankas farmers had used chemical fertilizers before they were banned. After they were banned, an astonishing 85% experienced crop losses. The numbers are shocking. After the fertilizer ban, rice production fell 20% and prices skyrocketed 50 percent in just six months. Sri Lanka had to import $450 million worth of rice despite having been self-sufficient in the grain just months earlier. The price of carrots and tomatoes rose five-fold. While there are just two million farmers in Sri Lanka, 15 million of the countrys 22 million people are directly or indirectly dependent on farming.
The bigger question is, how on Earth did Sri Lanka find itself in such a self-inflicted mess? Well, the short answer is: They were ill-advised by the likes of the WEF to go down this path of protecting the environment at the expense of severely compromising their food security. ESG has officially collapsed its first country, just like the IMF structural adjustment programs did in the 1980s and 1990s.
In a 2016 article, penned in collaboration with the WEF, economist Joseph Stiglitz showered praise on Sri Lankas overall economic development and wrote, Given its education levels, Sri Lanka may be able to move directly into more technologically advanced sectors, high-productivity organic farming, and higher-end tourism.
It is this very prescription that has failed dismally and the people of Sri Lanka are now facing the dire consequences of economic destruction, not experts like Joseph Stiglitz. What is suggested as a solution for the devastation caused by terrible ideas? More horrendous ideas from the institutions that caused the initial problem. In April 2022, as the government was negotiating with the IMF for a bailout, the United Nations Development Programme doubled down by recommending that the Sri Lankan government should become a candidate for a debt for nature swap that would unlock debt relief in exchange for investing a fixed sum on nature conservation. Furthermore, in May 2022, Sri Lanka signed onto a green finance taxonomy with the International Finance Corporation that, among other things, includes a commitment to organic fertilizers. It appears that they are determined to hold the line in support of "the current thing."
Despite the apparent failure of these policies in Sri Lanka, the Dutch government also threw their hat into the ring and is actively pursuing similar policies. The Dutch government is aiming for a 50% reduction in overall nitrogen greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. A 25 billion euro Nitrogen Fund was set up to help farmers (voluntarily) quit, relocate or downsize their business and make them more nature friendly (e.g. organic farming just like in Sri Lanka). The Dutch Minister for Nitrogen and Nature Policy, Ms. Christianne van der Wal, indicated that she expects about one-third of the Netherlands 50,000 farms to disappear by 2030 as a result of the plans and went on to point out that expropriation of farms was on the table as a measure of last resort should the farmers refuse to cooperate. Is this the part where they will own nothing and be happy?
Furthermore, in order to comply with this draconian emissions target decreed by the government, at least 30% of all cows, chickens and pigs will have to be culled. This has sparked protests by farmers who object to these green dictates. These protests are reminiscent of the Canadian Trucker protests earlier this year, and we have now seen farmers from Spain, Italy, Germany and Poland staging similar protests in a show of solidarity with their Dutch counterparts.
In addition to being the second largest exporter of food in the world after the U.S., the Netherlands is also the largest exporter of meat within the EU. Should the Dutch central planners have their way, its likely the Netherlands will join Sri Lanka on the list of countries destroyed by the current thing. Similarly, in an effort to cut emissions by half by 2030, both the U.S. and U.K. currently have different versions of pay farmers to not farm schemes in place. 35,000 acres of rice fields in California will remain unused, while in the U.K., dairy and meat farmers are being encouraged to retire in exchange for a one-time payment of up to 100,000 pounds. The Canadian government also intends to implement similar policies in an effort to reduce nitrogen greenhouse gasses by 30% by the year 2030. Not to be outdone, the New Zealand government unveiled plans to tax livestock for belching and flatulence, which they hope will reduce emissions. Such is the infinite wisdom of the central planners running the world today.
On the surface, ESG virtue-signaling may look like overzealous attempts by governments to do obeisance to the current thing in meeting their emissions targets, but these policies do seem like deliberate attempts to massively shrink the farming sector while nationalizing agricultural land in the process. According to the U.N., there is a looming food catastrophe around the corner. In a recent report, the World Food Program warned that 670 million people on average will be on the verge of starvation by the end of the decade. If this is true, why are governments around the world hindering the work of farmers?
While the WEF central planners are actively promoting climate-smart farming methods to make the full switch to net-zero, nature-positive food systems by 2030, the catastrophe in Sri Lanka is proof that its a path that likely ends in disaster. While this approach works for smaller communities, as of today, organic farming alone isnt enough to sustain large-scale farming. A full switch to organic farming would require more land use something the Dutch dont have a lot of and thus, more agricultural inputs to match current production levels required to feed large urban populations. Ironically, organic farming is unsustainable both economically and environmentally. For example, a permanent transition to organic production in Sri Lanka would reduce yields of every major crop; about 30% for coconut, 50% for tea, 50% for corn and 35% for rice. Why any sane government would embark on such a radical experiment is mind boggling.
According to Bloomberg, ESG is the fastest growing asset management class, which currently has $35 trillion assets under management and is expected to exceed $50 trillion by 2025. Despite sounding altruistic on the surface, ESG is actually a political metric that is used to indirectly control private companies by central planners through influencing the direction of capital flows to investments that they deem sustainable.
Its a mechanism to further centralize capital markets in the hands of the central planners who get to pick winners and losers based on adherence to a subjective and opaque criteria, instead of on the basis of value created. ESG is analogous to feudalism, in that an elite group of central planners and their cantillionaire cronies allocate capital to causes that further enrich themselves in the name of social good. This state of affairs is in stark contrast to Bitcoin which upends this dynamic by guaranteeing inalienable property rights to all participants within the network, not just to an elite few. In the same way that the Chinese Communist Partys social credit system scores an individual based on their allegiance to the state, corporate companies as well as nation-states pledge their fealty to woke institutional investors and the Davos elite with their ESG scores.
ESG is a mirror image of our fiat monetary system that distorts price signals within the economy, making it almost impossible to accurately measure which economic activities are creating the most value. Just like the fiat system, ESG adherence also encourages misallocation of capital resources and disrupts meaningful productivity. Ernst & Young also point out that ESG is not only confusing and opaque, but is also vulnerable to rampant greenwashing. With this in mind, it is astonishing that sovereign states are jostling over each other to obtain higher ESG scores by implementing policies that are self-destructive. How can an unjust monetary system produce a just society? Or as Jeff Booth puts it in The Price Of Tomorrow, How is it possible to solve climate change from an economic system that requires inflation? Any nation or company that destroys its productive capacity will collapse no matter how high their ESG score is.
In his classic essay, The Use of Knowledge in Society, renowned Austrian economist Friedrich Hayek wrote,
The economic problem of society is thus not merely a problem of how to allocate given resourcesif given is taken to mean given to a single mind which deliberately solves the problem set by these data. It is rather a problem of how to secure the best use of resources known to any of the members of society, for ends whose relative importance only these individuals know. Or, to put it briefly, it is a problem of the utilization of knowledge which is not given to anyone in its totality.
Central planners are not omniscient and therefore cannot accurately steer an entire economy that is composed of infinite complex systemic interactions that each require specialized knowledge. Knowledge which isnt resident in any single individual or institution. Despite this obvious fact, a handful of central planners are slowly collapsing food production with their policies that do not factor in the unintended consequences of their decisions.
As a fully decentralized system, Bitcoin is the antithesis of central planning. It didnt just become the beacon of a more just financial system but it represents a more superior governance model. Thanks to proof of work, all the nodes are able to arrive at the same truth independently without a central authoritys coordination. The true embodiment of rules without rulers.
Our current financial system is fueled by credit expansion and consumption. Such a system requires exponential growth to sustain itself. The end result is that the money supply continues to expand and money gradually loses its ability to coordinate economic activities efficiently. Price signals are mutilated in the process, thus erecting an economic Tower of Babel.
ESG is an attack vector that gains control of capital markets through this endless manipulation of money. The monetary policies that are being pursued globally by central planners are at odds with technological gains that would result in lower prices of goods over time. Instead, society is being kept on the treadmill of ever-increasing prices that require more consumption and more production ad infinitum in order to protect a credit-based system that would otherwise implode.
Political metrics like ESG do not hold sway over Bitcoin because its a monetary system that is anchored in objective truth. This opens up the room for capital allocation based solely on economic potential and value created as opposed to woke capital allocation. De-growth strategies, top-down centralized management of resources and control of capital allocation via ESG are features (not bugs) of the current financial system. Countries like Sri Lanka are prime examples of the destruction ESG has caused.
The attacks clothed as ESG that are being meted out against farmers are strikingly similar to those that are usually directed at bitcoin miners. As the most secure computer network in the world, Bitcoin is censorship resistant and doesnt bow to the tyrannical whims of central planners who have intentions of weaponizing the financial system against protesters. Unlike the Dutch farmland that is at risk of being confiscated, bitcoin cannot be confiscated via legislation; its money that you truly own. Its for this reason that the energy usage of bitcoin mining has been incessantly attacked by ESG evangelists through coordinated media campaigns that portray bitcoin mining as an existential threat to the environment. This has resulted in some jurisdictions, like the EU, considering banning proof-of-work mining, like how the Dutch government is trying to get rid of some of its farmers. The truth is, bitcoin minings energy mix has the highest penetration of renewables of any industry in the world, plus it monetizes stranded energy that would have otherwise been wasted. A fact the ESG warriors conveniently ignore.
The time has come for the creation of bitcoin circular economies and for us to support our farmers in order to protect our food systems from Malthusian central planners. Instead of bowing to their zero-sum worldview, trade groups like the Beef Initiative should become the norm. These bitcoin-based commodity markets and/or exchanges can also play a big role in providing farmers with access to global markets in a frictionless manner. In addition, orange-pilling nation states is now more important than ever for two major reasons: First, it will give nations alternatives for raising capital, like the volcano bonds, that are not tied to woke capital with diabolical strings attached. Second, it will produce examples of the prosperity a nation with sound money can achieve. Samson Mow and JAN3 are doing great work on this front, but there is room for more to join.
In conclusion, should current trends of kowtowing to ESG by governments continue, Sri Lanka will end up being a harbinger of larger things to come in the months ahead.
This is a guest post by Kudzai Kutukwa. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.
Read more here:
How The Attacks On Farming And Bitcoin Are Connected - Bitcoin Magazine
Stats Show Over 53000 Wrapped Bitcoins Were Removed From Circulation in the Last 3 Months Market Updates Bitcoin News – Bitcoin News
Three months ago, there were 441,546 wrapped or synthetic bitcoins on the Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain worth $17.45 billion using exchange rates on April 24, 2022. Since then, that number has dropped by 53,582 synthetic bitcoins and today the number of wrapped or bonded bitcoins is approximately 387,964 worth $8.81 billion in value.
In the last few years the use of wrapped, bonded or synthetic bitcoins has increased a great deal and earlier this year there were close to half a million synthetic bitcoins held on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC) and Ethereum (ETH) blockchains.
A great majority of these types of tokens stem from the Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) project as the ERC20s market cap is the 18th largest among 13,373 crypto assets. At press time, WBTC has a circulating supply of around 236,882 wrapped bitcoins with a valuation of around $5.38 billion today.
However, WBTCs circulating supply has decreased a great deal over the last three months as there was 280,505 WBTC in existence on April 23, 2022, according to Dune Analytics statistics. At the time, BTC was trading for $39K per unit and the WBTC market cap was valued at $10.93 billion.
WBTC is issued on Ethereum and at the time, the BSC BEP2 token otherwise known as BTCB had a circulating supply of around 105,172, and today the supply hasnt changed much as theres 105,175 BTCB in circulation. Three months ago the stash of BTCB was worth $4.10 billion and today its worth $2.39 billion.
While 53,582 synthetic bitcoins have been erased from aggregate of Ethereum-based tokens and most of the reduction stemmed from WBTC. Although, Dune Analytics metrics indicate that HBTC, and RENBTC saw declines during the last 90 days.
HBTC saw a high of 39,870 on May 15, 2022, and today, the number of HBTC in circulation is 38,970. Currently, the aggregate number of synthetic or wrapped bitcoins on both BSC and ETH represents around 1.847% of BTCs 21 million supply cap. The number of synthetic or wrapped bitcoins on Ethereum alone equates to 1.344%, which means the current supply of BTCB in existence represents 0.503% of BTCs capped supply.
What do you think about the number of wrapped or synthetic bitcoins declining during the last three months? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.
Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,700 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Coinmarketcap.com, Dune Analytics,
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.
Bitcoin (BTC) Bulls Are Back, Explains Binance CEO "CZ," Willy Woo And Michael Saylor – CoinGape
Bitcoin (BTC) bulls appear to be back as the crypto market takes off despite the Fed rate hike and recession fears. Crypto evangelists Binance CEO CZ, MicroStrategys Michael Saylor, and Galaxy Investments Mike Novogratz were bullish on the crypto market before the FOMC meeting and thinks the recession will indeed drive Bitcoin adoption.
Bitcoin (BTC) price skyrocketed by 29% in July, making a high of $24,294 after 2 months on July 29. The U.S. Fed rate hike and negative GDP report fail to pull down the market rally due to rising positive sentiments. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has jumped to 42 from 11 last month, making Bitcoin attractive above the $20k mark.
Binance CEO CZ in an interview with CNBC eases fear surrounding rising inflation and recession. He believes Bitcoin (BTC) is bearish above the $20k level as the last peak around $20kin 2017 acts as a strong psychological barrier.
He said the Bitcoin fundamentals are strong, money supply and Nasdaq 100 correlation are all secondary factors. The regulatory landscape improvement, higher inflation, and recession talks will help drive Bitcoin adoption.
He asserts logically the crypto market should move opposite to the stock market, but crypto is tied to macro factors these days due to its smaller market size. Both the crypto and equities markets are rising despite the Fed rate hike and recession fears.
The cryptocurrency market is so small that whenever the big ship tank or when stock markets crash, people want to hold cash. Today, most people who are trading cryptocurrencies also trade stocks. So right now its positively correlated, which is illogical, but its just the way it is right now.
Bitcoin analyst Willy Woo in a tweet on July 30 claims the Bitcoin accumulation is rising. He shared his personal Bitcoin capitulation and bear market bottom chart depicting historical Bitcoin movements. Bitcoin bulls can drive a rally.
Bitcoin evangelist and MicroStrategys CEO Michael Saylor believes Bitcoin will drive wave crypto regulation and rationalization as adoption continues to rise. In a recent tweet, he said:
This month the need for bitcoin climbed to another all-time high.
The Bitcoin (BTC) price has rallied significantly higher this week on the back of the crypto market and stock market rebound. In the last 24 hours, BTC made a high of $24,294, currently trading at $23,825, down just 1%.
The Bitcoin (BTC) price will remain bullish above the $20k level for a longer time. Meanwhile, tracking the price trends above the 200-WMA is important.
Varinder is a Technical Writer and Editor, Technology Enthusiast, and Analytical Thinker. Fascinated by Disruptive Technologies, he has shared his knowledge about Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet of Things. He has been associated with the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry for a substantial period and is currently covering all the latest updates and developments in the crypto industry.
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Next Story
See the original post:
Bitcoin (BTC) Bulls Are Back, Explains Binance CEO "CZ," Willy Woo And Michael Saylor - CoinGape
James Howells lost $181M bitcoin in dump: the $11M plan to get it back – Business Insider
James Howells' life changed when he threw out a hard drive about the size of an iPhone 6.
Howells, from the city of Newport in southern Wales, had two identical laptop hard drives squirreled away in a drawer in 2013. One was blank; he says the other contained 8,000 bitcoins now worth about $181 million, even after the recent crypto crash.
He'd meant to throw out the blank one, but instead the drive containing the cryptocurrency ended up going to the local dump in a garbage bag.
Nine years later, he's determined to get back his stash, which he mined in 2009.
Howells, 36, is hoping local authorities will let him stage a high-tech treasure hunt for the buried bitcoins. His problem is that he can't get into the dump.
For almost a decade, Newport's city council has denied his requests to dig for his hard drive, saying it would be expensive and environmentally damaging, but Howells is not deterred.
He gave Insider a first look at his new $11 million proposal backed by venture-capital funding to search up to 110,000 tons of garbage. He hopes presenting it to the council in the coming weeks will persuade it to let him finally try to recover the hard drive.
Looking for a hard drive among thousands of tons of garbage might seem like a Herculean task.
But Howells, a former IT worker, says he believes it's achievable through a combination of human sorters, robot dogs, and an artificial-intelligence-powered machine trained to look for hard drives on a conveyor belt.
His plan has two versions, based on how much of the landfill the council would allow him to search.
By his estimates, the most extensive option would take three years and involve scouring 100,000 metric tons or about 110,000 tons of garbage at a cost of $11 million. A scaled-down version would cost $6 million and take 18 months.
He has assembled a team of eight experts specializing in areas including AI-powered sorting, landfill excavation, waste management, and data extraction including one advisor who worked for a company that recovered data from the black box of the crashed Columbia space shuttle.
The experts and their companies would be contracted to execute the excavation and would receive a bonus should the bitcoin hoard be successfully retrieved.
"We're trying to achieve this project to a full commercial standard," Howells said.
Howells said machines would dig up the garbage, which would then be sorted at a pop-up facility near the landfill.
Human pickers would sift through it, along with a machine from a company in Oregon called Max-AI. The machine would look like a scanner set over a conveyor belt.
Remi Le Grand of Max-AI told Insider the company would train AI algorithms to spot hard drives that look similar to Howells'. A mechanical arm would then pick out any objects that could be contenders.
Howells has built security costs into his plan, fearing people may try to dig up the hard drive themselves.
He's budgeted for 24-hour CCTV cameras as well as two robotic "Spot" dogs from Boston Dynamics that would function as mobile CCTV patrols at night and sweep the area for anything that looks like his hard drive by day.
Howells told Insider his team had its first meeting in May at the Celtic Manor Resort outside Newport for what he called a dress rehearsal of his pitch to the council.
The meeting was filmed and attended by the former "Top Gear" host Richard Hammond, who has releaseda short YouTube documentaryabout Howells.
"They're clearly a bunch of very committed people who have faith in him and the plan," Hammond told Insider of Howells's team.
"It's a story that goes from the incredibly mundane to the colossal," Hammond said. "If I were in his position, I don't think I'd have the strength to answer the door."
After excavation, the garbage would be cleaned and as much as possible would be recycled, Howells said. The rest would be reburied.
"We do not want to damage the environment in any way," he said. "If anything, we want to leave everything in a better condition."
His plans also include building either a solar or wind-energy farm on top of the landfill site once the project is completed. Yet the chance of the council agreeing to his vision anytime soon looks slim.
"There is nothing that Mr. Howells could present to us" that would make the council agree, a council representative told Insider. "His proposals pose significant ecological risk, which we cannot accept and indeed are prevented from considering by the terms of our permit."
Whether the hard drive will work depends on a component called the "platter" a disc made of either glass or metal that holds the data. Howells says that so long as the platter isn't cracked, there's an 80% to 90% chance the data will be retrievable.
Phil Bridge, a data-recovery professional who has advised Howells on the project, told Insider these figures were accurate.
But if the platter is damaged, Bridge says, there is only a small chance the data could be retrieved.
Bridge says he got involved with the project because he found it intriguing. "It's just one of those cases that piques anyone's interest," he said. "It would be just a fantastic success story to help him get it back and prove everyone wrong really."
Hanspeter Jaberg and Karl Wendeborn, two venture capitalists who are based, respectively, in Switzerland and Germany, told Insider they had promised to provide $11 million to fund the project if Howells won council approval.
"It's obviously a needle in the haystack, and it's a very, very high-risk investment," Jaberg said.
Howells said he didn't have a contract with the prospective backers but had discussed the plan in Zoom meetings. "Until I've got something in writing from Newport City Council," he said, "there is nothing to sign up to."
Howells said if he managed to retrieve the data, he would keep roughly 30% of what's on there worth just over $54 million at current value.
He said about a third would go to the recovery team, 30% to the investors, and the rest for local causes including giving 50, or about $61 at current value, in bitcoin to each of Newport's 150,000 residents.
The amount has fallen from the $240 each he told CNN in January 2021; Howells said he decided to put more money into securing "professional companies" for the excavation to help convince the council.
If Howells fails to get the council's backing, he says, his last resort will be taking the local authority to court with the claim that its actions constitute an "illegal embargo" on the hard drive. "I've been reluctant to go down that route in the past because I've not wanted to cause problems," he said. "I wanted to work with Newport City Council."
Howells said he'd never been granted a face-to-face meeting with the council. He said he was given a 20-minute Zoom meeting in May 2021 but hoped his new business plan would help him break through.
He said he met with his local member of Parliament, Jessica Morden, on June 24. Morden's office confirmed the meeting took place.
Once he's made the council aware of his new plan, all he can do is wait. "This is the best situation I've been in so far," he said. "This is the most professional operation we've put together, and we've got all the best people involved."
The "crypto proponent" says he makes his living by buying bitcoin every month and selling it when he needs cash.
Howells says he tries not to think too much about what his share of the money would allow him to do, if the hard drive is ever found in working order. "Otherwise," he said, "you just drive yourself crazy."
See the rest here:
James Howells lost $181M bitcoin in dump: the $11M plan to get it back - Business Insider
Coinbase pops 9% as cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ether rally – CNBC
Monitors display Coinbase signage during the company's initial public offering (IPO) at the Nasdaq MarketSite in New York, on Wednesday, April 14, 2021.
Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Shares of Coinbase closed up 9% on Monday as cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ether rallied.
Bitcoin, the world's largest cryptocurrency, was trading at $21,926, up around 4% Monday afternoon, according to Coinbase data. Ethereum also jumped roughly 9%, trading at $1,478.
Ethereum comprises roughly 30% of Coinbase's trading volume, while Bitcoin amounts to about 21%, according to CoinMarketCap data.
Tech stocks are largely in the green on Monday, as investors appear to bet that the Federal Reserve will be less aggressive against inflation than feared. That may be giving Coinbase shares some extra steam. Still, the company's stock is down 76% for the year and is off about 83% from its 52-week high on Nov. 9, 2021.
Coinbase's surge comes came after an internal email from the company last month said the company is laying off 18% of its employees.
CEO Brian Armstrong also warned last quarter that the company grew "too quickly" during a bull market and called out the need to manage Coinbase's burn rate and increase efficiency. He also said that crypto winters may result in a decline in trading activity.
"We appear to be entering a recession after a 10+ year economic boom. A recession could lead to another crypto winter, and could last for an extended period," Armstrong said in the email. "While it's hard to predict the economy or the markets, we always plan for the worst so we can operate the business through any environment."
Follow this link:
Coinbase pops 9% as cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ether rally - CNBC
Bitcoin ‘will be part of everyone’s portfolio’, says former Blackrock executive – Finbold – Finance in Bold
Former Blackrock Executive and investment adviser Edward Dowd has stressed that despite the recent crypto market turmoil, Bitcoin is here to stay and has the qualities to make it into everyones portfolio.
While appearing on Layah Heilperns podcast, Dowd reiterated that once Bitcoin matures, it will likely beat gold due to unique features such as the ability to be transacted digitally.
According to Dowd, although gold remains a viable investment, Bitcoin stands a better chance as a store of wealth. He stated that Bitcoins growth journey, characterised by rises and falls, is helping the flagship cryptocurrencys ability to stay longer.
Bitcoin is here to stay. It is going to be a part of everyones portfolio. At least with Bitcoin, you can exchange it digitally, and gold is a much tougher sale for me. Im not against gold, and having some gold is not a bad idea, he said.
The investment adviser added that with the maturity of the cryptocurrency sector, Bitcoin is likely to stand out from the rest of the market. He believes that the cryptocurrency market can be compared to the dot com era when most companies collapsed while the stronger ones survived. According to Dowd:
I can liken crypto to the dot com era where 90% of those companies went to zero. 10% of them became Amazon. Its the job of the crypto folks to figure out what is the crypto Amazon. I think Bitcoin is obviously in the running. For some of these other coins, good luck!
Furthermore, Dowd maintained that Bitcoins growth would be guided by the assets key attributes that make it better than central banks. In this case, he cited elements like transparency, freedom and technology.
His sentiments come as the general cryptocurrencies continue to sustain recent short-term gains led by Bitcoin. The number one ranked cryptocurrency has maintained gains above $20,000, with the market regaining the $1 trillion capitalisation, at the time of publication.
Watch the full interview below:
Disclaimer: The content on this site should not be considered investment advice. Investing is speculative. When investing, your capital is at risk.
Why Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Cardano Are Rocketing Higher Today – The Motley Fool
What happened
It's been another solid day in the crypto world, with headlines that the aggregate value of all cryptocurrencies has once again passed the $1 trillion threshold, bolstering investor confidence in this sector.
This surge higher has been driven, in large part, by recent moves in Bitcoin (BTC 6.55%), Ethereum (ETH 14.75%), and Cardano (ADA 7.41%). As of 10:15 a.m. ET, these three top-10 tokens were up 4.1%, 9.1%, and 9.4%, respectively.
While Bitcoin's solid momentum over the past week, fueled by what appears to be renewed bullish sentiment and strong demand for digital currencies, is garnering headlines, it's Ethereum's outsize moves higher that have grabbed most investors' attention. Last Thursday, Ethereum started rising on news that a tentative date of Sept. 19 has been set for "the merge," which will combine Ethereum's mainnet and Beacon Chain, creating a proof-of-stake blockchain. Since Thursday morning, Ethereum has surged more than 35% at the time of writing.
Cardano appears to be benefiting from the enthusiasm around Ethereum's upcoming merge as the former prepares for its Vasil hard fork, which will bring a number of improvements to Cardano's blockchain. This hard fork had been delayed, similar to Ethereum's merge, which led to earlier concerns. However, with more optimism than pessimism today, investors appear to be taking a more positive stance on network upgrades to start the week.
The upgrades underway for Ethereum and Cardano are a source of significant uncertainty for investors. There's always a chance something will go wrong, and value could be destroyed in the process of making improvements. With bearish sentiment prevailing lately, investors appear to increasingly be erring on the side of caution, waiting for concrete evidence everything will be OK before jumping in.
While those on Ethereum's developer team, including Ethereum founder Tim Beiko (who initially put the Sep. 19 date out there), have made sure to refrain from providing a "hard" date, investors now have a rough timeline for this catalyst. Other positive factors, such as the narrowing of the spread between staked Ether and Ether, suggest investors are providing significant credence to the idea this merge will take place before the end of Q3.
The next few months are shaping up to be volatile ones for these top crytpo projects. These various upgrades, previously seen as both catalysts and potential sources of uncertainty, are once again being viewed with a positive lens. That means that, right now, Ethereum's merge and Cardano's Vasil hard fork are the bullish catalysts investors have been hoping for.
That said, whether this momentum can be carried forward remains to be seen. This bear market is a doozy, and overall sentiment in the crypto sector continues to reflect extreme fear. Until that changes, it's going to be hard for such momentum-driven rallies to hold steady. Accordingly, investors may want to exhibit caution before adding aggressively to these top growth-oriented projects.
Read this article:
Why Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Cardano Are Rocketing Higher Today - The Motley Fool
The Real Scaling Solution For Bitcoin – Bitcoin Magazine
This is an opinion editorial by Knut Svanholm, author of Bitcoin: Sovereignty Through Mathematics.
Bitcoin skeptics often claim that bitcoin doesnt scale. They say that bitcoins on-chain transaction capacity of about seven transactions per second is too low, especially compared to the most common credit and debit card networks. These networks are centralized databases capable of more than a hundred thousand transactions per second. The standard Bitcoiner reply is that these critics havent heard about Layer 2 solutions to the scaling problem, such as the Lightning Network. While its true that Layer 2 will probably solve the problem eventually, it is not a rapid enough solution in the event of a quick hyperbitcoinization. After all, if all base layer transactions are new Lightning nodes, only seven new nodes can be fired up per second, right? In truth, the critics and most Bitcoiners do not see the bigger picture here. Both groups are missing the forest for all the trees. Let us think this through.
We live in a world where fiat money dominates the world economy. Every country on Earth has a national currency or uses one minted (printed) in another country, such as the euro or the U.S. dollar. These currencies have in common that they're all inflationary, meaning that there are central authorities that have the right to issue new units of them. As those who have studied bitcoin or economics know, prices denominated in these currencies continually rise over time. Bitcoin is often compared to gold, as the cost of mining gold is relatively unaffected by changes in the price of gold. But this analogy is wrong. Bitcoin is not gold. The cost of mining bitcoin does correlate with the price of bitcoin, but the issuance rate of new bitcoin does not. This fixed issuance rate is an entirely new phenomenon and only exists in bitcoin. No other commodity behaves this way. Prices rise over time on a fiat money standard, but transactions are fast. Prices were relatively stable during the gold standard, but gold was very costly to transport. Bitcoin is cheap to transport and absolutely finite, meaning that prices denominated in bitcoin will continue to decrease over time.
As technology advances faster and faster, prices ought to decline. The only reason they dont is money printing or monetary policy, as those with access to the printers call it. Nothing about bitcoin allows for this to happen. The long-term implications of absolute scarcity in money are very hard to understand for people who have only ever known fiat economies. We simply cant wrap our heads around ever-declining prices. No one can imagine what such a society will look like. But one thing is sure transactions per second is a metric important to the old system, not the new.
The Zeitgeist movies from about a decade ago were attempts at describing what a future without money might look like. They explained how flawed our old institutions are, from religious institutions to political and juridical institutions and, perhaps most importantly, the fractional reserve banking system. Then they somewhat naively proposed that if the world stopped using money, wed usher in a new era of peace and prosperity. These movies lacked an explanation of how to get there, however. They missed that there is no difference between voluntary interactions and monetary transactions, given that the money is honest. A sound money, free market society is a voluntary society. The path to the utopian Venus Project cities described in these movies is bitcoin.
The brilliant Canadian serial entrepreneur Jeff Booth has often described bitcoin as a bridge to the other side. Almost all Bitcoiners agree that our current system is flawed, and we need a way out. Bitcoin is that way out. But whats on the other side of the bridge? That is the more profound question here. When you think long and hard about it, you realize that the world on the other side of the bridge is the real scaling solution. With truthfulness in the base layer of society, the need for monetary transactions will go down, not up.
Every good is a service. Every human interaction is a transaction. We dont crave money; we want what we think it will buy us. We dont want the sofa; we want the ability to sit on a couch whenever we feel like doing so. To put it another way, we want access to the abundance technological progress enables. Inflationary money is a force in the opposite direction. It necessitates higher prices and thus less access to the riches that technology unlocks. It creates an elite class that gets richer over time at the expense of everyone else. Deflationary money will do the opposite. It will give everyone a reason to save rather than overconsume, giving more people access to whatever they want over time because of the falling prices. If you postpone your spending, your bitcoin will buy you more in the future. In other words, fewer transactions. Quality before quantity. The necessity for transactions per second will diminish.
Now think about how you interact with your family and friends. You rarely use money, right? Remember, every voluntary interaction is a transaction. You exchange information and share experiences with your loved ones all the time, all without ever exchanging a single satoshi. The Bitcoin community is like this too. Everyone is very generous with their time and effort. You notice this when you spend time with so-called toxic Bitcoin maximalists. We dont care about making money. We care about making the world a better place. Ive received boundless help from other Bitcoiners in the forms of proofreading, translations, art, website building and many different things, all for free. All I had to do was provide something of value back. Like in my family and with my friends, there was mutual trust; thus, no money was needed.
After all, the only reason societies need cash in the first place is to enable transactions between people that dont know or trust each other. Sadly, everyone seems to have forgotten this in fiat land. All Bitcoiners benefit from the success and ever-increasing purchasing power of bitcoin. Therefore, every Bitcoiner is incentivized to help one another. When hyperbitcoinization is upon us, everyone will be a Bitcoiner. Everyone will have this incentive. Ironically, "Don't trust, verify," somehow unlocked an ability to trust each other on a scale never before known to man. The kicker is that we had this ability all along. Bitcoin is a private key to our hearts, so we can wear them on our sleeves in public. The real scaling solution is honesty. When we have that, the division of labor happens automatically.
By running the mathematical experiment called Bitcoin in the back of our heads at all times, we unlock the true power of human cooperation. The need for smaller transactions disappears as everyones time preference is lowered and our ability to love our neighbor increases. You wont pay for your coffee in the future. Youll get it for free. Only significant, essential investments that provide enough value to humanity will be worth making since simply holding on to your bitcoin will be a better strategy in most cases. The ability to make micropayments fast and cheap to anyone worldwide will still be there because of Layer 2 scaling solutions, but people wont need to use it very often. Bitcoin culture is the opposite of fiat culture. We have a bright orange future; the faster we embrace it, the better off well be.
This is a guest post by Knut Svanholm. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.
Original post:
The Real Scaling Solution For Bitcoin - Bitcoin Magazine
How to know if the Bitcoin price has bottomed or not – FXStreet
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page.
If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet.
FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted.
The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment advice.
Continue reading here:
How to know if the Bitcoin price has bottomed or not - FXStreet
What happened when the Bitcoin creator disappeared? – Cryptopolitan
On October 31, 2008, an anonymous user or group of users going by the name Satoshi Nakamoto released a white paper detailing a new form of currency called bitcoin. The paper proposed a decentralized system allowing users to execute the transaction without requiring a central authority. So, if you are planning to trade Bitcoin, you may also consider knowing Can Bitcoin Become A Global Exchange Medium?
Nakamoto followed up the release of the white paper with the development of a bitcoin software program and the creation of the first-ever bitcoin block, the genesis block. After that, Nakamoto disappeared from the internet, leaving only a few cryptic messages behind.
Since then, bitcoin has grown into a global phenomenon, with hundreds of billions of dollars worth of value built around it. However, Nakamotos disappearance remains shrouded in mystery.
Some believe that they wanted to create something and then move on. Others believe Nakamoto may have died or been forced to step away for personal reasons. Whatever the case, Satoshi Nakamotos departure from the scene leaves bitcoin without a transparent creator or figurehead.
But Over time till now, we are not sure what exactly happened to Satoshi Nakamoto, unfortunately.
Why did the creator disappear, and what does that mean for Bitcoins future?
Bitcoin was invented in 2009, and its anonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto made sure to disappear from the internet entirely. Some speculate that Nakamoto did this because Bitcoins success would mean certain ruin for fiat currencies, and governments would not hesitate to shut down or regulate Bitcoin out of existence.
Others believe that Nakamoto wanted to create a global currency that would be free from government interference. Whatever the reason, Nakamotos disappearance has left a vacuum at the top of the Bitcoin community that has yet to be filled. It has led to often-fractious debate over how best to scale Bitcoin and whether or not to modify its code to accommodate more transactions.
However, Nakamotos original vision for Bitcoin as a borderless, decentralized currency remains intact, and his legacy continues to shape the future of the worlds most famous cryptocurrency.
How has this news impacted cryptocurrency, and what does it mean for investors and users?
The news of the disappearance of the creator of bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, has had a significant impact on the cryptocurrency community. Nakamoto was the anonymous figurehead of the bitcoin project for years, and his absence has left a void yet to be filled.
This event has cast doubt on the future of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and many investors have sold their holdings. However, it is essential to remember that cryptocurrency is still in its early stages, and this setback does not invalidate its long-term potential. This event could catalyze positive change in the space, leading to greater regulation and transparency.
For now, investors and users should remain cautious but optimistic about the future of cryptocurrency.
What could happen to Bitcoin now that its founder has seemingly disappeared without a trace?
Bitcoin is a digital currency that can be quickly sent without the involvement of a third party from user to user on the peer-to-peer bitcoin network.
Though we know that bitcoin was created in 2008, it was initiated in 2009 when it was made official to the public. Nakamoto has never been found or identified. It is unclear what will happen to Bitcoin now that Nakamoto has disappeared.
Some believe that the currency will survive and prosper without him, while others believe that his absence could cause the system to collapse. Only time will tell what will happen to Bitcoin and other digital currencies in the wake of Nakamotos disappearance.
Conclusion
Its been nearly ten years since the mysterious creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, disappeared from the internet. Since then, there has been much speculation about their true identity. But despite numerous efforts to unmask Nakamoto, we still dont know who they are.
While we may never know the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, we can be sure that they were brilliant minds who had a profound impact on the world of cryptocurrency. Satoshi changed how we think about money and opened up a new world of possibilities for financial transactions.
Their legacy will continue to live on through Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
Read the original:
What happened when the Bitcoin creator disappeared? - Cryptopolitan