Many companies claim to offer free cloud hosting, yet few offer anything worth using. What good is a free service when what you get is disappointingly unreliable and excruciatingly slow? The best free cloud hosting services actually let you try their platforms, without any trickery or false promises.

Thats why we tested the biggest free cloud platforms thoroughly, cutting them down to the top six. Ive detailed exactly what youll get with each platform and how you can maximize its potential. Take a look below for all the details.

Keep in mind, though, that every free cloud hosting platform has limitations. Youll likely be working with a tiny amount of resources, and you cant expect any reasonable level of customer support. For serious projects, Id recommend a paid option. It is possible to pay budget prices and still get the full power of the cloud keep reading to learn how.

Despite the lack of a forever free plan, Kamatera offers the best overall value. For just a couple of dollars per month, you can get a fully customizable cloud instance without any limitations and great performance to back it up.

Like many cloud hosts, Kamatera charges by the hour. This gives you full control over your servers overall pricing you can quickly scale your server up or down to meet your exact needs and budget. You can try this out for yourself with Kamateras free 30-day trial, supported by a dedicated account manager who can answer any queries.

Additionally, the performance tests in our Kamatera review revealed loading times of a single second, along with perfect uptime. Kamatera is among our top-rated cloud hosts for 2022 for a reason: it offers lower prices than much of the competition, along with comparable, if not faster, performance.

GearHost claims that it was made with love in Arizona. While Im generally skeptical about things made with love in Arizona, I tried the service out and was really happy with what I saw. It took me minutes to get on-board and launch my free cloud instance, and the entire process was extremely well thought of.

The service has five different cloud plans, with the basic one being completely free to use, for life. After choosing the free plan, all it took to get started was a quick signup form and basic email verification. Some of the other services on this list require your credit card as an insurance policy, but GearHost didnt ask for any payment details of any kind.

Keep in mind that theres no root access available, so youll be relying solely on the interface for performing configurations. There are limitations to this approach. For example, you wont be able to use development environments that arent .NET or PHP. Then again, it also simplifies the process of getting your cloud instance online, as youll never have to use the command line. Read our expert GearHost reviewfor more details.

Amazons premier cloud web service, AWS, is divided into three products: Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), Elastic Beanstalk, and Lightsail. The last two are designed as easy-to-use platforms that utilize the cloud computing resources that EC2 provides.

The best part? EC2 has a free tier that offers complete access to a limited set of resources, allowing you to familiarize yourself with AWS service and configure it to your exact needs. The AWS free tier includes 12 months of access, during which youll get 750 computing hours a month. Impressive, and our expert thought so too. Read all about it in our detailed review of AWS.

The micro instance that comes with the free tier can run either Linux or Windows and is fit for low to moderate performance needs. This wont be enough for a production-ready site, but youll be able to install and test WordPress, as well as advanced frameworks like Django and Node.js.

Of all the companies on this list, none provide a service as streamlined and easy to use as Herokus. There are far fewer options and features to concern yourself with: Dynos make the building blocks of their service. In Herokus own words, Dynos are isolated, virtualized Linux containers. Theyre designed to execute code based on a user-specified command, and here there are only six types are available. The first one is completely free to use.

Its through this combination of zero cost and ease of use that Heroku becomes such a great option for students and developers. Once you sign up and get your dyno going, you can immediately get a runtime environment up. Multiple languages and frameworks, such as Python, Node.js, and Ruby, are available for deployment without any extra configurations.

The free dynowill net you 512 MB of RAM and 2 process types (equal to 1 vCPU), making it a great platform for school projects and general experimentation. Youll be able to run WordPress and similar platforms on a PHP environment, but youll find Herokus cloud instance to be slightly weaker than its competitors. See the results of our performance tests here.

Googles cloud service, GCP, offers a ton of products but it can get very confusing. The sheer number of options is sure to send novice developers back to the cozy arms of regular providers, so take a moment to decide if youre ready to get your hands dirty.

Compute Engine instances are going to be your best buddies for building a WordPress website, and the free tier is always free. Youll get one f1-micro instance per month on the free tier, and it offers a surprising amount of storage space to play with. See what users think here.

Googles free GCP tier is an excellent option if youre looking for free cloud hosting for developers, but youll need to be in the United States to get the most out of it. Youll only get US-based cloud instances, and your bandwidth wont be available to destinations such as China or Australia.

Red Hat, known for the popular Red Hat Linux distribution, used to have an always free starter plan for its reliable cloud platform. The starter plan is no longer available, but there is a 30-day free trial of OpenShift Online Pro, so Red Hat OpenShift still makes it onto the list if only because its one of the most powerful cloud instances available.

Its quite a formidable setup, but your machine will go into hibernation after 30 minutes of inactivity. After your 30-day trial, your subscription will automatically renew but if you cancel before the end of the trial period, you still get the full 30 days to evaluate Red Hat OpenShift.

The discontinuation of the free plan is a disadvantage, but it doesnt stop OpenShift from being the best cloud hosting for students available today. The platform is geared toward rapid development (not as much as Heroku, but much more than AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure), and can ably run almost any test project or school app you can conjure. You can use it with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, too and Red Hat and AWS have announced a partnership that will more closely integrate OpenShift with AWS.

Azure offers a free product system very similar to AWS: Some are free for 12 months, others for life, and some are available for trial through the use of credit. Among the cloud resources that are free for 12 months, youll find Linux virtual machines, storage space, databases, and bandwidth.

Azures generous free resources allotment, specifically the bandwidth, make it a great place for projects aiming for production-readiness. The resources youll get for free (1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM, 5 GB space) are actually more than what a lot of shared hosting providers offer on their intermediate to advanced plans!

Whats the catch? No catch really, except the one that affects all of these cloud providers these platforms were not built for the novice user. It takes expertise, knowledge, and a lot of time to get everything working together nicely read about our experts experiences in the full review.

If youre just looking to experiment, or youre developing projects for your school or as a hobby, theres really no need to commit to a paid plan. These free plans are powerful enough to handle most of what you can throw at them, and youll learn a lot by using them. Red Hat OpenShift and Heroku are my personal favorites.

On the other hand, if youre looking to get a production-ready cloud environment going, the free cloud hosting providers will probably not be enough. Your resources will be heavily limited, you wont be getting much support, and some services are prone to hibernation after a period of inactivity.

For such cases, Id highly recommend at least trying out Kamteras free trial. Youll get 30 days to try out a powerful cloud instance that can be scaled as you please. Id consider setting up the server youll need, and see how much this would cost outside the trial. For entry-level servers, you can enjoy some very low prices.

Still stuck? Heres a nifty table to help you out.

FAQ

Why should you pay for cloud hosting?Free cloud platforms typically have heavy limitations on resources, along with a lack of support and reliability issues. If youre looking to run anything other than a few simple prototypes, a paid solution is likely the better option. You can get cloud hosting for cheap, especially if you take advantage of the latest deals for January 2022 on our coupon page.Is cloud hosting faster than shared hosting?In most cases, yes. Most cloud hosts offer you dedicated resources that do not need to be shared, allowing them to offer faster and more reliable performance. That said, shared hosting offers generally lower prices along with more user-friendly platforms. Check out our list of the best web hosting services for our top picks.

Read more here:
6 Best Completely FREE Cloud Hosting Services [2022 UPDATE]

By Supantha Mukherjee and Promit Mukherjee

STOCKHOLM/JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - Oracle opened a data centre in South Africa on Wednesday to provide local cloud services across Africa for the first time, joining the likes of Microsoft and Amazon in setting up facilities in the southernmost country on the continent.

Africa will be the U.S. company's 37th "cloud region" - an area that allows customers to get faster access from a local data centre, in this case in Johannesburg.

Oracle is racing to open at least 44 cloud regions this year as it plans to catch up with cloud computing rivals such as Microsoft, Amazon and Google.

Though Oracle has no plans for more data centers in Africa this year, more could come next year as the company explores areas such as West Africa, Cherian Varghese, regional managing director for Middle East and Africa, told Reuters.

Increased demand for faster computing from African banks and telecom firms has attracted big cloud operators into the largely untapped market, with Microsoft the first to launch data centers in South Africa, followed by Amazon and Huawei.

Fast connectivity provided by a submarine communication cable and being Africa's most developed economy have made South Africa a key location for cloud operators, with over 50 data centres in the country, mostly near Cape Town and Johannesburg.

However, South Africa comes with infrastructure challenges, such as high power prices and frequent power cuts, meaning additional costs have to be set aside for back-up power.

Smaller cloud operators are also trying to grab a piece of the fast-expanding market for data localisation.

U.S.-based Digital Realty is buying a majority stake in a Johannesburg-based date centre operator for $3.5 billion, while Vantage Data Centres has also announced plans to invest up to a billion dollars to set up a data centre in South Africa.

(Reporting by Supantha Mukherjee, European Technology & Telecoms Correspondent, based in Stockholm, and Promit Mukherjee in Johannesburg; Editing by Mark Potter)

Read more:
Oracle opens data centre to provide cloud services across Africa

From predicting suicidality to disinfecting masks, these faculty members are some of USFs top innovators.

Six USF researchers with innovations ranging from artificial intelligence that can detect and predict suicidality, to encrypting and protecting sensitive information from cloud servers, to disinfecting and recharging masks for safe multiple use, are recipients of this years USF Excellence in Innovation Award.

Three of the faculty members are from the USF College of Engineering, one is from the USF Health Morsani College of Medicine and two have joint appointments with both colleges. USF, one of the nations most innovative public research universities, ranks eighth among American public research universities and 15th among all universities worldwide in generating new U.S. utility patents.

The Excellence in Innovation Award recognizes faculty for their accomplishments in moving inventions to market through creating new startups and commercializing their technologies and by advancing research and development through publishing in peer-reviewed journals and securing grants to support their projects.

This award celebrates innovation and entrepreneurial success by our investigators and scholars recognizing their contributions to the knowledge base, USF President Rhea Law said. These six outstanding faculty members embody high-quality research, invention, and entrepreneurship, inspiring our students and our community. Their work illustrates the level of engagement USF has in research and invention, creating whole new realities that make the world a better place.

This years awards cover achievements in innovation from July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. Nominations were reviewed by members of the USF chapter of the National Academy of Inventors.

The winners are:

In addition to demonstrating outstanding productivity, as evidenced by his 12 publications in health technology, Dr. Bunnell had many exceptional achievements during fiscal year2021. He and his colleagues received a $551,840 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R56 grant to use artificial intelligence to detect and predict suicidality from electronic health record clinical note text. With a $621,296 NIMH grant, he developed Adhere.ly, a web-based platform to help mental health therapists engage youth patients in therapeutic skill development. He subsequently received an $837,485 NIMH Phase I Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) grant to expand the platform for use with adult patients. Dr. Bunnell formed a strategic partnership between his company, Adhere.ly LLC and Doxy.me Inc., a telemedicine platform with 1,000,000 provider users, to integrate Adhere.ly into its user-interface, which is being funded by a $136,289 award from the Florida High Tech Corridor. Adhere.ly LLC holds an exclusive option agreement with USF and is currently negotiating a license agreement with USF Research Foundation.

Jing Wang holds 11 U.S. patents and several provisional patents, including one jointly filed with II-VI, a publicly traded global manufacturing company, and has multiple projects being funded by about a dozen technology corporations and organizations. In fiscal year 2021, three doctoral students and one masters student involved in industry-funded research projects graduated under his supervision. During this time, three invention disclosures were filed by student-inventors. He was also elected a senior member of the National Academy of Inventors and Agere Systems Endowed Chair, a tribute to his translational research and innovation.

Attila Yavuz's research focuses on efficient end-to-end protection of encrypted systems to enable trustworthy machine learning for users without revealing sensitive contents to cloud servers. Prior work has been expensive for embedded devices and relied on strong trust assumptions for data collection and analysis. Yavuz's research presents a series of new techniques that offer lightweight post-quantum signatures, consensus and metadata-hiding file-sharing properties. This research has resulted in several papers and a patent filing.

Sarah Zhong responded quickly to combat COVID-19 by enabling safe reuse of masks through corona discharge, which can simultaneously disinfect and recharge masks. This NSF-funded and patent pending technique addresses mask shortages and environmental burdens caused by the pandemic. It has drawn significant attention from the media and society. She also invented another patent-pending technology to realize ultra-fast binder-free printing through electrostatic printing. Zhongs entrepreneurial accomplishments include a registered startup company and participation in I-Corps training. She published four papers in top academic journals, which included being featured on the supplemental cover of Environmental Science & Technology and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. In addition to receiving an NSF RAPID award, she received a $25,000 USF COVID-19 RapidResponse Grant and a $20,000 USF InterdisciplinaryResearchGrant.

Richard Heller (photo on left) and Mark Jaroszeski (photo on right) have advisory and ownership interests in MMD Technologies, enabling them to commercialize intellectual property related to drug/gene delivery for the veterinary and human clinical markets.During the 2020-2021 fiscal year, they received four U.S. patents for new intellectual property and submitted applications for four utility patents and one provisional patent. Their entrepreneurial achievements resulted in forging a licensing agreement with MMD Technologies. Heller and Jaroszeski have successfully competed for a $25,000 Bull Ring Accelerator Award to foster commercialization and were awarded a nearly $60,000 National Institutes of Health Diversity Supplement to fund a graduate student for instrumentation development related to this technology. They also commercialized a USF-discovered product, partnering with medical device manufacturer PRESCO to design and build a commercial-grade device that is ready for the veterinary market.

Visit link:
Six USF faculty members recognized with Excellence in Innovation Awards - University of South Florida

Dave Ramsey, a personal finance expert for Christians, came under fire last week. On his radio show The Ramsey Show he spent some time arguing that Christian landlords are not at fault if tenants become unable to afford rent:

Okay, I own rental property, single family homes, among many other properties that we own. And if I raised my rent to be market rate that does not make me a bad Christian. I did not displace the person out of that house if they can no longer afford it.

Many accused Ramsey of engaging in mental gymnastics to avoid his moral responsibility to his tenants:

As a Christian interested in economics, Ramseys comments and the surrounding controversy piqued my interest. Ive never been a Dave Ramsey follower. I wont get into particular disagreements I have, but, put simply, I dont believe his money management philosophy will lead to the best financial results for many. At the same time, I dont deny his program has been helpful to some.

But, disagreements on personal finance aside, is Ramsey right or wrong here? Are critics correct or are they reaching? As with most answers, some nuance is required here.

First, lets begin with what the critics have right. Even though changes in supply and demand lead to changes in market prices, individual business owners are free to charge different prices. An owner need not passively set prices where everyone else does.

Second, the Bible does tell Christians be charitable and help the poor. At this point it needs to be stated that the Bible, and the words of Jesus in particular, is often twisted when it comes to matters of money. But even with this in mind, its unambiguous that the Bible calls giving a righteous act. Consider 1 John 3:17 which says, But if anyone has the world's goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart against him, how does God's love abide in him?

So are Christian landlords called to be charitable to their tenants? I think the answer is a pretty straightforward yes. In that sense, I believe some criticism of the above statement is warranted.

Its imaginable that a Christian landlord could be generous and keep prices lower than the market price to help the destitute. In fact, in the context of the full video, Ramsey does explain situations where hes made exceptions to help his tenants on a case-by-case basis. And there are likely many cases where this would be the loving thing to do.

At the same time, Ramseys statement about market forces cant be ignored. Consider a market for housing that experiences a sudden increase in demand. When demand increases for housing, people are willing to pay more for it. This drives the price of housing up and makes it more profitable to rent houses. But the story doesnt end here.

Those higher profits draw more suppliers into the housing market. When there are more people providing housing, the cost of providing housing goes up.

To see why, consider the cost of a landlord repairing an HVAC system. When the amount of landlords is relatively small, they dont have much competition hiring HVAC repairmen. In this case, the price is low.

When a larger quantity of rental suppliers (landlords) enter the housing market, however, there is more competition to hire contractors to come fix HVAC systems. With this increased competition, the price of HVAC repair is bid up. In other words, an increase in the demand for housing causes an increase in demand for contractors which increases the cost of being a landlord.

HVAC repair is only one example. All of the factors used in running a housing rental business increase in demand and price as more landlords enter. And so long as landlords can make a profit by entering the rental market, they will enter. This drives up costs until all the profits created by the increase in demand dry up. At the new, higher price, the economic profit tends to zero.

Notice what this means for a landlord who doesnt raise prices. If rental companies charging higher prices are tending toward zero profit, maintaining a lower price means tending toward a loss. The housing is being rented for the same price, but now the cost is higher. This means losses.

If a landlord had lower costs than competitors, the business may still be able to operate profitably. But the higher the market price goes relative to the price the landlord charges, the closer the landlord is to making a loss, everything else held constant.

The result of the logic is clear. If the price of housing goes up and a landlord chooses not to increase the rent, there is some point where they will start making a loss.

At this point critics may say, so what? After all, charity means you lose wealth right? I agree with this too. If we expected people to be materially better off from charity, wed all be giving to get rich quick.

But heres the final problem. Losses arent sustainable forever. If a landlord freezes rent today, and prices and costs continue to increase, at some point the landlord will go out of business.

And a Christian cant be generous with tenants if they dont have a business to produce wealth in the first place.

Heres where critics get into really weird territory. Christians involved in any kind of business can always be charitable to the point of going out of business. Christian grocery store? Give away all your food for free. Christian school? Hire the best teachers and don't charge any tuition. Christian landlord? Buy more houses and let people stay in them for free. If you arent out of money, you can always donate more.

This logical conclusion seems unambiguously bad. If Christian businesses are obligated to give until they go out of business, there wont be Christian businesses. And if there arent Christian businesses, there wont be any more charity from Christian businesses.

My claim isnt that Christian business-people should never be generous. As I already stated, I believe they should. But ignoring market forces entirely only guarantees there wont be Christian businesses.

This logic extends into our personal lives too. Once your LLC is out of business, you still have personal wealth to give away. And here we come to a final conclusion.

Unless your interpretation of the Bible is that you have to maintain zero worldly possessions, you recognize implicitly that some amount of charity in the present is imprudent, if for no other reason than it will prevent future charity or fulfillment of obligations (to family for example).

If your standard is never having earthly possessions, you have a consistent criticism of Ramsey, though Im unsure how youre reading this article without any possessions.

Charging below market price is effectively giving money to charity. You make a loss, and in exchange someone is better off. Christians can choose to do this. In many cases I believe we are called to. But perpetual losses mean you will run out of money. Market changes can be ignored, but their consequences cannot.

So if Christians are called to give, but they arent called to give everything in the immediate present, when are we called to give our wealth away and to whom? Should a landlord forgive the rent of a fourth tenant even if it means going out of business in a year and forsaking the other three getting a break? How much savings should landlords with family have on hand?

There isnt a flowchart to answer all these questions. The details of specific circumstances are where the answers lie. However, I think Christians are given a straightforward rule of thumb. Our security should be found in Christ, not in the things of this world. If the decision to not be charitable at a particular time is based on our desire for things of the world, our heart is in the wrong place.

If charity is forgone because Christians believe their resources can be better stewarded for the love of God and others elsewhere, we have a different story.

Its possible that Ramseys own philosophy is to give to charity mainly outside of his business. Should someone diminish their giving to one cause in order to be able to accept losses in their business? The less income you have, the less you can give, after all. Again, I think the answer here depends on the situation.

Im not sure if Ramsey does this or not. I dont know his finances. But this manner of giving isnt uncommon for capitalists in the US, as it lines up well with the fact that the US has been the most charitable country in the world for a decade now.

My guess is that, on balance, most Christians in and outside of business could be more generous. No one is without sin. But pretending like market forces are irrelevant to our decisions as stewards doesnt help others or our mission any more than ignoring the laws of physics helps our ability to aid someone whos falling out of a building.

Read this article:
Was Dave Ramsey Right or Wrong about the Responsibilities (or Lack Thereof) of Christian Capitalists? | Peter Jacobsen - Foundation for Economic...