Category Archives: Computer Science
Amazon engineers and scientists honored for work in space travel, search, and robotics – About Amazon
In her long career as a space scientist, MiMi Aung has achieved things that are out of this world. Literally. Aung capped her three decades at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory by leading a team that built and flew the Ingenuity Mars Helicopter over the surface of the red planet in 2021. Talking to CBS Evening News after the flight, she said it was a Wright Brothers moment, but on another planet.
Aung also worked on systems for deep space communication and networks, autonomous space flight, and other projects at NASA. Now at Amazon, she is the director of technical program management for Project Kuiper, an initiative to increase broadband internet access through a constellation of satellites in low Earth orbit.
I am driven by Project Kuipers mission to provide reliable, fast, affordable broadband to unserved and underserved communities around the world, said Aung, who was born in the U.S., grew up in Myanmar, and earned bachelors and masters degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Aungs stellar accomplishments also caught the attention of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), which is Americas leading engineering organization and recognizes individuals who have pioneered and developed new fields of technology. The nonprofit recently inducted Aung as a membermarking one of the highest professional distinctions for an engineer.
The NAE, founded in 1964, brings together eminent scientists and engineers to provide insights to the federal government on matters related to science and technology. All members are elected by their peers.
As a person who is passionate about being a part of teams that build challenging complex engineering systems, the induction to the NAE is deeply meaningful to me, Aung said.
Aung is among four Amazon employees who have been inducted into the 2,000-member academy in the last three years. She was honored at this years annual NAE meeting in Washington, D.C., on October 2-3.
The Amazon quartet also includes Ken Washington, vice president and general manager for consumer robotics at Amazon; Yoelle Maarek, vice president for research and science at Amazon; and Russell Allgor, chief scientist at Amazons Global Delivery Services.
Read on to learn more about their backgroundsand how they put their nationally recognized engineering talents to work at Amazon.
Like Aung, Washington is a star-struck engineer. He leads the team responsible for developing Astro, the companys first home robot. A life-long Trekkie who lives in a smart home filled with Alexa-enabled devicesa nod to Star Treks Starship EnterpriseWashington is a leading expert on ambient intelligence.
Ambient intelligence is the idea that digital systems, services, and devices, including robots, should work together in the background on our behalf. What comes in the foreground is what it does for you, Washington said. People dont care about computers; they care about what computers do for them. When you don't even know that those technologies are there and your days are just frictionless and magical, thats our North Star.
Prior to Amazon, Washington was the chief information officer at Sandia National Laboratories, Lockheed Martins first chief privacy officer, and Fords chief technology officer, where he helped the automaker develop autonomous cars, among other things. Washington was elected into the NAE in 2020. He has a bachelors, masters, and Ph.D. in nuclear engineering from Texas A&M University.
Maarek, who started in the Alexa organization at Amazon in 2017, joined the National Engineering Academy in 2021. Before coming to Amazon, she was vice president of research at Yahoo, and prior to that, she helped Google develop its auto-suggest function and was the companys first engineer in Israel. She also worked for IBM Research.
At Amazon, Maarek leads teams in the U.S., UK, and Israel that work on advancements in voice search, question answering, and conversational artificial intelligence (AI). In particular, she focuses on the shopping domain and investigating new research areaslike computational humor, which she sees at the one of the hardest existing AI challenges.
Maarek earned her Ph.D. in computer science at the Technion in Israel and an engineering degree from Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chausses in Paris. She said she was honored and humbled to join such a prestigious community when she was inducted into the NAE.
I look forward to collaborating with other engineers and scientists in order to continue doing what Ive loved doing throughout my careerleveraging science and technology to facilitate the lives of people across the world and hopefully delight them, she said.
Allgor joined Amazon in 2000 as the companys first research scientist. He built the first such team at Amazon, which now22 years lateremploys several thousand research scientists. Allgor currently serves as the chief scientist for Amazons global distribution systems.
He has focused on different areas in Amazons worldwide operations throughout his career, from facility location and inventory placement to optimizing Amazons transportation network through, among others, applied research on last mile delivery and air scheduling. Allgors team utilizes scientific innovation and invention to support the more than 1 million Amazon employees and partners at fulfillment centers, sortation centers, and delivery stations worldwide. Together, they ensure that customers get their packages as reliably and safely as possible.
Allgor earned a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a bachelors degree in chemical engineering from Princeton University. He, too, said he was incredibly honored when he was elected by his peers to join the NAE. Im especially looking forward to collaborating with my peers on improving engineering education and contributing to a more diverse and multidisciplinary next generation of engineers.
Learn more about the Amazons engineering projects, including Project Kuiper and Alexa, and how Amazon is investing in future engineers.
See the original post:
Vanderbilt’s Carpenter, Monteggia and Rathmell elected to National Academy of Medicine – Vanderbilt University News
Three Vanderbilt University faculty members have been elected this year to membership in the National Academy of Medicine, a prestigious, non-governmental organization that advises the nation and the world on important aspects of medical science, health care and public health. They are:
With these new members, Vanderbilt University and Vanderbilt University Medical Center have 25 current and emeritus faculty members (living) who have been elected to the National Academy of Medicine by their peers in recognition of outstanding achievement.
Congratulations to Drs. Carpenter, Monteggia and Rathmell on their election to the National Academy of Medicine, Provost C. Cybele Raver said. Their accomplishments represent such a great example of the kind of bold, high-impact research we carry out here at Vanderbilt. Each of these stellar faculty members carries out rigorous, pathbreaking work in multiple fields of inquiry, yielding discoveries that benefit society in real and meaningful ways.
I want to congratulate Drs. Carpenter, Monteggia and Rathmell on their election into this esteemed body. Their contributions to medicine and science are profoundly important, and this prominent recognition with election by their peers is so well deserved, said Dr. Jeff Balser, president and chief executive officer of VUMC and dean of Vanderbilt University School of Medicine. Balser is the chair of the planning committee for the National Academy of Medicine 2022 annual meeting.
Carpenter is a health and labor economist who studies the effects of public policies on health and family outcomes. He has published widely on the effects of legal same-sex marriage, the causes and consequences of youth substance use and the effects of public policies on health behaviors such as bicycle helmet use, seatbelt use and vaccination.
As founder and director of Vanderbilts LGBTQ+ Policy Lab, Carpenter and his team apply an interdisciplinary approach to advance understanding of how social and policy contexts impact the lives of LGBTQIA+ people. Earlier this year, the lab conducted the first comprehensive study on the health effects of legal same-sex marriage.
Before coming to Vanderbilt, Carpenter was associate professor of economics/public policy at UC Irvines Paul Merage School of Business. He was also a Robert Wood Johnson Postdoctoral Scholar in Health Policy Research at the University of Michigan.
He holds a B.A. in mathematics, economics and public service from Albion College and a Ph.D. in economics from UC Berkeley.
Monteggia was recruited to Vanderbilt in 2018 to become the director of the Vanderbilt Brain Institute. She studies the neural mechanisms underlying antidepressant efficacy. Her work to identify the proteins in the brain targeted by the rapid-acting antidepressant action of ketamine has opened the door to new possibilities for the development of drugs that mimic ketamines antidepressant benefits without its side effects.
Her laboratory has been investigating the role of neurotrophins, or nerve cell growth factors, and the role they play in depressive-like behavior and the efficacy of antidepressants. The National Academy of Medicine cited her pioneering work identifying a causal link between neurotrophin signaling and antidepressant action.
Her studies of a mouse model of Rett syndrome led to an investigation of epigenetic factors that affect gene activity and expression and which regulate the function of synapses, the gaps between nerve cells, in the central nervous system. This research has relevance for other disorders, including traumatic brain injury.
Her honors include a Distinguished Investigator Award as well as the Daniel X. Friedman Award for outstanding research achievement from the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, the Daniel H. Efron Award for outstanding basic and translational research by the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology and the International Mental Health Research Organization Award.
Monteggia currently serves on the Board of Scientific Counselors for the National Institute of Mental Health, board of directors of the International Rett Syndrome Foundation and the Scientific Council of the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. She is an elected Councilor for the Society for Neuroscience.
Monteggia earned her Ph.D. in neuroscience in 1999 from the Chicago Medical School of the Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, where her research focused on drug abuse. After postdoctoral work at Yale, she joined the faculty at UT Southwestern Medical School, where she was promoted to full professor in the Department of Neuroscience in 2013 and held the Ginny and John Eulich Professorship in Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Rathmell is an internationally recognized physician-scientist whose career has spanned molecular biology research in the pathogenesis of kidney cancer, nationally funded large-scale genomic studies of cancer and clinical investigations that have brought new biomarkers, imaging modalities and life-saving therapies to patient care.
She is nationally known for her advocacy of physician-scientist training, as a champion for funding for kidney cancer research with work to elevate the cause for rare or heritable forms of the disease, and for the development of policies that address drug shortages and conflicts of interest in scientific publishing in equitable ways.
Rathmell leads the Vanderbilt Integrated Molecular Oncology Research Training Program, a T32 training program for clinical fellows that is supported by the National Cancer Institute, and she co-leads the Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Career Development Program with Dr. Debra Friedman, E. Bronson Ingram Chair of Pediatric Oncology, and director of the Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.
Rathmell is the author of more than 200 peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, books and chapters, and she is a frequently invited guest speaker on topics ranging from kidney cancer biology and cancer metabolism to academic leadership skills development.
In 2019 the Kidney Cancer Association recognized Rathmells research accomplishments and leadership achievements with its top honor, the Eugene P. Schonfeld Award, which recognizes highly respected health care professionals who have made significant contributions in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. She was the first woman to receive the award.
She earned an M.D. and Ph.D. in biophysics at Stanford University, completed internship training at the University of Chicago and finished medicine and oncology training at the University of Pennsylvania. Before joining the Vanderbilt faculty in 2015, she served for 12 years on the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
With more than 2,400 members, the NAM (formerly the Institute of Medicine) collaborates closely with its peer academies, the National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engineering, to provide independent and authoritative advice on matters of science, technology and health nationally and globally.
The new members were announced during the NAMs annual meeting on Oct. 1617. Balser, elected to the NAM in 2008, chaired the meetings planning committee. Bradley Malin, Accenture Professor of Biomedical Informatics, Biostatistics, and Computer Science at Vanderbilt, and a NAM member since 2018, was among the panelists at the meetings scientific session: Revolutionizing the Biomedical and Health Sciences.
Since 1990, 37 current, emeritus and former faculty members of the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine have been elected to membership in the NAM by their peers in recognition of their professional achievement and commitment to service.
1990 James Blumstein (Medicine)
1991 Larry Churchill (Medicine, emeritus)
Mildred Stahlman (Medicine, emerita)
1994 John Oates (Medicine, deceased)
1996 Brigid Hogan (Medicine, left in 2002)
1998 Steven Gabbe (Medicine, left in 2008)
George Hill (Medicine, emeritus)
2000 William Stead (Medicine)
2001 Dan Masys (Medicine, left in 2011)
2002 Harry Jacobson (Medicine, emeritus)
2003 Harold Moses (Medicine, emeritus)
Peter Buerhaus (Nursing, left in 2015)
2006 Ellen Wright Clayton (Medicine)
Randolph Miller (Medicine, emeritus)
Alastair Wood (Medicine, emeritus)
2008 Jeff Balser (Medicine)
Kathryn Edwards (Medicine)
Walter Frontera (Medicine, left in 2017)
2009 Michael DeBaun (Medicine)
2010 Kevin Johnson (Medicine, left in 2021)
2011 Jonathan Gitlin (Medicine, left.in 2012)
2012 Dan Beauchamp (Medicine)
Sten Vermund (Medicine, left in 2017)
2013 Mark Frisse (Medicine, emeritus)
Betsy Weiner (Nursing, emerita)
2014 Nancy Brown (Medicine, left in 2020)
James Crowe (Medicine)
2017 Melinda Buntin (Medicine)
Josh Denny (Medicine, left adjunct status 2020)
2018 Brad Malin (Medicine)
2020 Nancy Carrasco (Medicine)
Velma McBride-Murry (Medicine and Peabody)
Consuelo Wilkins (Medicine)
2021 Shari Barkin (Medicine, left in 2022)
2022 Christopher Carpenter (Economics)
Lisa Monteggia (Medicine)
Kimryn Rathmell (Medicine)
Follow this link:
NU administration removes occupancy sensors in ISEC in response to privacy, ethical concerns – The Huntington News
Students and faculty working in the Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Complex, or ISEC, pushed back against Northeastern administration last week after the university attempted to monitor their activity at their desks through occupancy sensors.
In a Sept. 16 email to ISEC faculty, Senior Vice Provost for Research David Luzzi introduced the idea of a research study including placing monitoring sensors under assigned desks within ISEC to identify and document desk occupancy and usage.
As the amount of use-inspired research being done by our community grows every day, so does the desire from more members of our research community to utilize the space that provides boundless research opportunity, Luzzi wrote. In order to develop best practices for assigning desks and seating within ISEC, the Office of the Provost will be conducting a study aimed at quantifying the usage of currently assigned seating in the write-up areas outside of the labs and the computational research desks. The results will be used to develop best practices for assigning desks and seating within ISEC (and EXP in due course).
The initial email emphasized that the sensors would not collect the identity of any individuals,analyze an individuals time at their desk, evaluate or rate performance of students or employees or share information with supervisors of the occupants of the space.
The sensors were then installed later last month without faculty or student knowledge, according to graduate students working in ISEC. Following the installation the night of Sept. 26, some who work in ISEC wrote an open letter to Luzzi and Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs David Madigan, voicing their concerns about the study.
Some of the letters main points included overall privacy concerns, lack of communication from the university that the study was taking place, concern over about the kinds of sensors being used and the poorly conceived nature of the study. Over 250 faculty, students and staff signed the letter.
Taking a step back, Northeastern prides itself on being a world leader in security and privacy research, with a particular focus on how to ensure that the benefits of new technologies are enjoyed by all. However, to accomplish that goal requires trust between the faculty, students, staff, and the upper administration, the group wrote in the letter. To roll out such a study one that runs counter to the research mission of many of the study subjects themselves in this manner, with no consultation, discussion, or input is counterproductive and harmful to Northeasterns reputation as a top-tier research institution.
One of the labs being monitored by the sensors within ISEC was the universitys Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute. Lisa Oakley, a Ph.D. student in the Khoury College of Computer Science, works for the institute, and said she had privacy concerns about that the study. The devices used by the university were Spaceti Desk Presence Smart Stones which, according to some students, do not have the capability to anonymize the data they collect, allowing anyone to access this information.
We took particular issue with this because there are many people in our lab who do research on the privacy leakage that these kinds of devices can have, and know that theres no way to anonymize, and were able to look at the devices and figure out that they were not taking any steps to anonymize the data that was coming out of them, Oakley said. So they just installed these devices that were just sharing information broadly to anybody who connected to them about whether or not we were sitting at our desks.
Some students and faculty who spoke with The News argued the devices were easy to hack into and obtain information from, and given the nature of the assigned desks in ISEC, individuals could identify who was at their desks at a given time. Students were able to demonstrate that the devices were not anonymous, despite contrary claims from Northeastern. Ph.D. student in the Khoury College of Computer Sciences Xenia Dragon was able to reverse-engineer the device with her colleagues within days of them being installed.
Theres documentation online about exactly how these devices operate, which makes it really easy to just set up a radio and start capturing messages. And so I did this, within hours, I had had a feed of everything being sent from all of these sensors. And its, again, not encrypted at all, she said.
Dragon said she felt having the sensors installed in the cybersecurity lab was an insult to the researchers working there.
Besides it being a massive privacy violation, and besides it being a thing that no students were actually asked about or consented to, there are people in that lab that study embedded devices and [have] published papers on how a bunch of [internet of things] devices are really trivially broken and have really bad security, she said. So its a slap in the face honestly to have the very same devices that we have papers on just put under everybodys desk without any questions asked. It just doesnt make sense.
Ankit Mittal, a Ph.D. student in the College of Engineering, had scheduled a research demo for industry partners that was disrupted by the placement of the sensors. Since he is a Ph.D. student, he said he was not included in the original communication from Luzzi regarding the implementation of the sensors.
In the [Internet of Things, or] IoT lab, we work on the [industrial, scientific and medical, or] ISM band, which is the unlicensed band which is available for [internet of things] devices to communicate with each other, Mittal said. [The sensors] absolutely interfere with that which can affect the accuracy of the results that one has, and so thats another dimension of concern. I would say its not just about security of data, but its about the fundamental research I was totally surprised by this interference that I started observing in my experiments.
Some ISEC faculty members supported the efforts of the graduate students in removing the sensors. In an email to Luzzi shared with The News by Oakley, Engin Kirda, a professor of computer science, echoed concerns and offered suggestions to administrators on how to move forward.
Having discussed this with other stakeholders, we think pausing this data collection at this point and beginning a [dialogue] with the subjects of the study would be a productive way forward. In particular, understanding the tradeoffs of these sensors versus other methods of data collection (e.g., logs from the door locks) would be a useful starting point, he wrote. The letter was signed by over 250 ISEC residents in under 24 hours, and the number continues to grow. I think this does indicate that this experiment has hit a nerve for many and created unease and unhappiness, but we remain very hopeful that these concerns can be addressed with a productive [dialogue].
Because the sensors were intended to monitor how much time individuals spent in their research spaces, some faculty and graduate students were concerned that the research would lead to them having to share their assigned space with undergraduate students and administrators. Khoury College Ph.D. student Max von Hippel explained how disruptive this would be to the quality of the research being produced in ISEC.
With the nature of research, you need to have a space, you can go to it any hour of the day, or even pretty late into the night to you know, be in quiet, have a whiteboard and focus. And if I have to go on a website and choose a slot to share my desk with somebody, Im not going to do it, Ill just tell you right now, Ill literally never come to the office, if thats the case, because its too annoying, he said. I think thats what [administration] wants. They want to bully us into being remote, so that then they can take our space and use it for administrators. And they have plenty of money, they could just buy more space.
Responding to claims that undergraduates will not be able to use the lab space within ISEC, Oakley pointed out that many undergraduate students are already collaborating with researchers within the labs.
We have never prevented undergraduate researchers from joining the lab and participating in research. And that is something that almost every lab has been actively working toward, she said.
Oakley also said that, in her eyes, ISEC does not feel very interdisciplinary due to the lack of access to other floors and labs and that this study does nothing to promote interdisciplinary research and collaboration.
Were never told what the other floors do. Even people have been told when going into other labs that theyre not allowed to be there unless they have a desk there. This idea that its an interdisciplinary building is not true either, she said.
Many other graduate students, including von Hippel, echoed these sentiments.
Theres a myriad of ways that they could increase the interdisciplinary aspect of ISEC that we could help them [with], if they, I dont know, would consider asking us instead of just surveilling us and disparaging us, von Hippel said.
To protest the sensors, many graduate students on the sixth floor of ISEC removed them from the work desks and stuck them on a kitchen table.
On Oct. 6, Luzzi hosted a town hall meeting with ISEC students and faculty regarding their concerns about the sensors. According to Oakley, the meeting was held with very short notice and faculty members had to inform graduate students that it was taking place, despite the study also having direct implications for them and their research.
Before the meeting, a group of Ph.D. students brought down a number of the sensors on a banner, and laid them out in front of the room to indicate that we were not happy with what was happening, she said. As more of a public presence, because it seemed like the town hall was not being done in good faith. We work together across floors of ISEC to bring a visual representation of our unhappiness with what was happening.
Luzzi faced additional backlash from faculty and students regarding the study at the town hall. At 3 p.m. the same day, Luzzi announced in an email that the sensors would be removed from ISEC.
Given the concerns voiced by a population of our graduate students around the project to gather data on desk usage in a model research building (ISEC), we are pulling all of the desk occupancy sensors from the building. For those of you who have engaged in discussion, please accept my gratitude for that engagement, Luzzi wrote.
On Oct. 8, Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs David Madigan sent a follow-up email to faculty members regarding the removal of the sensors. Madigan encouraged faculty members to pass along the message to graduate students working in ISEC.
I want to make it clear that all of the desk sensors installed in ISEC have been removed and will not be reinstalled, Madigan wrote. While our intent was simply to assess overall desk usage the sensors are not capable of identifying specific individuals we fully understand the privacy concerns that have been raised. Once your concerns were expressed, we moved quickly to remove the sensors.
Moving forward, some of those working and researching in ISEC are concerned that the administration will try to monitor their desk space again.
Are [they] going to try and put some sensors again, without our knowledge and without our consent? These are the things that concern us, Mittal said.
Editors Note: This story was edited at 4:33 p.m. to clarify that Northeastern Media Relations responded to request for comment comment to The News through emails already sent to faculty.
Here is the original post:
Developing New Tools to Fight Cancer – Duke University School of Medicine
For decades, medical cancer treatment has generally meant chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery, alone or in combination. But things are changing rapidly. Today, new approaches such as immunotherapies and targeted therapies are becoming available, with many more in research and development. In many cases, the new treatments are more effective, with fewer side effects.
Its an exciting time to be in cancer research and cancer discovery, said Colin Duckett, PhD, professor of pathology, interim chair of the Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, and vice dean for basic science."
Were moving into this era where we have a new set of tools we can use to treat cancer.-Colin Duckett, PhD
Researchers in the Duke Cancer Institute (DCI) and across the School of Medicine are helping to create these new tools, fueled by the knowledge and experience of experts from a wide range of disciplines.
Indeed, cancer research has always been a team-based endeavor at DCI.
DCI was specifically created a decade ago to break down barriers between disciplines to stimulate collaborative research and multidisciplinary interaction, said DCI Executive Director Michael Kastan, MD, PhD, the William and Jane Shingleton Distinguished Professor of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology.
Adding fuel to the fire is the Duke Science and Technology (DST) initiative, which aims to catalyze and support collaborative research in service of solving some of the worlds most pressing problems, including cancer.
The new tools, though varied, all represent advances in personalized cancer medicine. Targeted treatments are chosen based on the genetic signature of a patients tumor. Some immunotherapies take personalization even further, by manipulating a patients own immune cells to create a treatment for that individual alone.
To match treatments to patients, the multidisciplinary Duke Molecular Tumor Board, led by John Strickler, MD, HS11, and Matthew McKinney, MD06, HS06-09, HS10-13, helps providers identify best practices, newly approved treatments, or clinical trials for advanced cancer patients based on genetic sequencing of their tumors.
In precision cancer medicine the right therapy for the right patient at the right time all these things come together, the targeted therapies, the immunotherapy, even standard chemotherapy, all of that is part of precision cancer medicine.-Michael Kastan, MD, PhD
Immunotherapy aims to harness the power of the immune system to fight cancer. That can mean activating the immune system, energizing exhausted immune cells, or helping immune cells find cancer cells by guiding them there or by removing cancers good guy disguises.
Dukes Center for Cancer Immunotherapy supports these efforts by identifying promising basic science discoveries and building teams to translate those ideas into treatments.
"There are so many world-class basic research scientists here making discoveries..."-Scott Antonia, MD, PhD
...discoveries that are potentially translatable as immunotherapeutic strategies, said Scott Antonia, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and the centers founding director. Thats what motivated me to come to Duke, because of the great opportunity to interact with basic scientists to develop new immunotherapeutics and get them into the clinic.
Antonia believes immunotherapy has the potential to revolutionize cancer treatment, but more work remains to be done to realize its promise. The proof of principle is there, he said, but still only a relatively small fraction of people enjoy long-term survival. If we can hone immunotherapeutic approaches, thats our best opportunity.
Among the most exciting immunotherapy work being facilitated by the center involves removing a patients own T cells (a type of lymphocyte), manipulating them in the lab to make them more effective against tumors, then injecting them back into the patient.
T cells can be manipulated in the lab in a number of different ways. In one approach, called CAR T-cell therapy, the T cells are engineered with an addition of synthetic antibody fragments that bind to the patients tumor, effectively directing the T cells directly to the tumor cells.
In another approach, called tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) adoptive cell therapy, the subset of a patients T cells that have already managed to find their way into the tumor are extracted and then grown to large numbers before being returned to the patient. Antonia and his colleagues recently published a paper demonstrating the effectiveness of TIL expansion in lung cancer. Were now doing the preparative work to develop clinical trials using this approach in brain tumors, and our intention is to expand into many other cancers as well, he said.
Antonia points out that innovations in CAR T-cell therapy and TIL therapy happening at Duke are possible because of collaborations with scientists in an array of disciplines, including antibody experts like Barton Haynes, MD, HS73-75, the Frederic M. Hanes Professor of Medicine, and Wilton Williams, PhD, associate professor of medicine and surgery, at the Duke Human Vaccine Institute, and biomedical engineers like Charles Gersbach, PhD, the John W. Strohbehn Distinguished Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the Pratt School of Engineering.
Furthermore, clinical trials for these kinds of cellular therapies require special facilities to engineer or expand the cells, which are provided by Dukes Marcus Center for Cellular Cures, led by Joanne Kurtzberg, MD, the Jerome S. Harris Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics, and Beth Shaz, MD, MBA, professor of pathology. Its been a very productive collaboration highlighting how Duke is uniquely positioned to develop immunotherapeutic strategies, Antonia said.
Targeted therapies exploit a tumors weak spot: a genetic mutation, for example. The benefit is that the treatment kills only cancer cells and not healthy cells. The prerequisite is knowing the genetics and biology of the specific tumor, no simple task.
Trudy Oliver, PhD05, who joined the Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology faculty as a Duke Science and Technology Scholar, studies cancer development and the biology of tumor subtypes, particularly squamous cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer.
Even within small cell lung cancer, there are subsets that behave differently from each other, she said. Some of the treatments shes identified are in clinical trials
Our work suggests that when you tailor therapy to those subsets, you can make a difference in outcome.-Trudy Oliver, PhD'05
Some of the treatments shes identified are in clinical trials.
Sandeep Dave, MD, Wellcome Distinguished Professor of Medicine, is leading an ambitious project to analyze the genomics of the more than 100 different types of blood cancer. His project will streamline the diagnosis of blood cancer and uncover potential therapy targets.
All cancers arise from genetic alterations that allow cancer to survive and thrive at the expense of the host, he said. These genetic alterations are a double-edged sword they allow these cancer cells to grow, but on the other hand they do confer specific vulnerabilities that we can potentially exploit.
Dave said his background in computer science, genetics, and oncology helped him as he designed the project, which uses huge datasets.
Weve done the heavy lifting in terms of tool development and methodology, which is ripe to be applied to every other type of cancer."-Sandeep Dave, MD
Cancer disparities are caused by a complex interplay of elements, including access to health care and other resources, institutional barriers, structural racism, and biology, such as ancestry-related genetics. For example, some genetic biological factors and social elements contribute to disparities in many types of cancer.
Cancer treatment is approaching this personalized space where patients are no longer treated with a one-size-fits-all paradigm."-Tammara Watts, MD, PhD
"Its becoming increasingly apparent that there are differences in outcome with respect to race and ethnicity, said Tammara Watts, MD, PhD, associate professor of head and neck surgery & communication sciences, and associate director of equity, diversity, and inclusion at DCI. The very broad hypothesis is that there are genetic ancestry-related changes that may play a critical role in the disparate clinical outcomes we see every day in our cancer patients.
For example, self-identified white patients with throat cancer associated with the human papilloma virus (HPV) have better outcomes compared to self-identified Black patients, even when controlling for elements such as health care access, education, and socioeconomic status.
Watts is collaborating with bioinformatics experts at DCI to try to identify significant differences in gene expression among the two groups.
Im trying to tease out differences that may be impactful for disadvantaged patients based on race and ethnicity, she said. But there could be differences that emerge that could be useful for designing targeted treatments for a broad group of patients.
Thats because a targeted treatment for a particular genetic expression that might occur more commonly in Black people would help all patients with that expression, regardless of race or ethnicity.
Watts is far from alone in doing cancer disparity research at DCI. Tomi Akinyemiju, PhD, associate professor in population health sciences, uses epidemiology to study both biological factors and social elements that contribute to disparities in many types of cancer.
Jennifer Freedman, PhD, associate professor of medicine, Daniel George, MD92, professor of medicine, and Steven Patierno, PhD, professor of medicine and deputy director of DCI, are studying the molecular basis for why prostate, breast, and lung cancer tend to be more aggressive and lethal in patients who self-identify as Black. Patierno, who has been a national leader in cancer disparities research for more than 20 years, leads the Duke Cancer Disparities SPORE (Specialized Program of Research Excellence), funded by the National Cancer Institute. The SPORE grant supports these researchers as well as other DCI teams working on cancers of the breast, lung, stomach, and head and neck.
One of the things that impresses me is that [cancer disparities research] is a high priority within DCI, said Watts, who joined the faculty in 2019. These groups are actively engaged and collaborating and asking the questions that will drive change for patients who have worse outcomes that are related to ancestry.
Even better than a cancer cure is avoiding cancer altogether.
At DCI, Meira Epplein, PhD, associate professor in population health sciences, and Katherine Garman, MD02, MHS02, HS02-06, HS09, associate professor of medicine, are looking to decrease the incidence of stomach cancer by improving detection and treatment of the bacteria Helicobacter pylori, which can set off a cascade leading to stomach cancer. Epplein and Garman, also funded by the Duke Cancer Disparities SPORE grant, hope their work will reduce disparities because H. pylori infections and stomach cancer are both more prevalent among African Americans than whites.
When preventing cancer isnt successful, the next best thing is to detect and treat early. A relatively new concept in cancer care is interception, which means catching cancer just as, or even just before, it begins.
The point is to prevent it from progressing to full blown malignancy, said Patierno. In other words, stop the cancer from getting over its own goal line.
Patierno envisions a future where patients with pre-cancerous conditions or early cancer could take a pill to halt cancer development without killing cells in other words, a non-cytotoxic treatment, unlike standard chemotherapy.
We know its there, but were not going to poison it or burn it or cut it out because all of those have side effects. Were going to find a non-cytotoxic way to prevent it from progressing. Thats the goal.-Steven Patierno, PhD
Read About Alumni Making a Differencein Cancer Research and Care:
Changing theStatus Quo: Lori Pierce MD'85
Treatingthe WholePerson:Arif Kamal, MD,HS12, MHS15
Targetingthe Seeds ofCancer Growth:Eugenie S. Kleinerman, MD75, HS75
A DiscoveryThat Comes Outof Nowhere:Bill Kaelin, BS79, MD82
Story originally published in DukeMed Alumni News, Fall 2022.
Read more from DukeMed Alumni News
Read the original here:
Developing New Tools to Fight Cancer - Duke University School of Medicine
Everything You Should Know About Becoming A Cybersecurity Analyst – Forbes
Editorial Note: We earn a commission from partner links on Forbes Advisor. Commissions do not affect our editors' opinions or evaluations.
Entities of all kinds, from retailers to government organizations, store and transmit online data every day. As a result, it is becoming increasingly important to keep this data out of the hands of malicious actors.
Enter the cybersecurity analyst, who works to defend precious information from a faceless and ever-changing adversary. In this article, we explore how to become a cybersecurity analyst. We also share essential information about this career path, including cybersecurity salary and job outlook data.
Cybersecurity analysts plan, carry out and monitor security measures to protect their organizations computer networks, systems and sensitive information.
As for day-to-day responsibilities, cybersecurity analysts maintain security software such as firewalls and data encryption programs. They also investigate security breaches and prepare reports about said breaches to provide metrics for management.
With ever-evolving security needs, a cybersecurity analyst must stay abreast of the latest security trends, including the techniques hackers use to infiltrate computer systems. These professionals also research new security technologies to ensure their organizations are using the most effective security systems.
A cybersecurity analyst is a type of information security analyst. Both roles aim to protect and secure data, but cybersecurity analysts focus on cybercrimes. Such crimes include identity theft, fraud, ransomware and spoofing or phishing to trick users into sharing sensitive information.
Cybersecurity analysts enjoy above-average demand and earn relatively high salaries. The U.S. Board of Labor Statistics (BLS) does not provide data on cybersecurity analysts specifically, but the BLS does report data on information security analysts. Lets take a closer look.
According to the BLS, infosec analysts earn a median annual salary of $102,600, which is more than double the median annual salary for all workers nationwide. The top 10% of earners make over $165,920.
Cyberseek.org does provide salary data on cybersecurity analysts specifically. According to Cyberseek, these professionals at mid-level earn an average annual wage of $107,500.
As for job demand, the BLS projects a significant 35% growth in jobs for information security analysts from 2021 to 2031, amounting to an additional 19,500 jobs per year.
This demand is due to the increasing adoption of cloud services by small and medium-sized businesses. Increased cyberattacks have led to a higher need for cybersecurity analysts as well.
Becoming a cybersecurity analyst can lead to high earning potential and strong job security. As with many highly educated careers, the path to becoming a cybersecurity analyst typically begins with earning a college degree. Candidates must then gain experience in entry-level cybersecurity jobs.
Since the cybersecurity field is constantly changing, we recommend keeping up to date with the latest technologies and practices by obtaining and maintaining certifications. These credentials can position you to flourish in the information security field.
A bachelors degree in cybersecurity, computer and information technology or a related field like math or engineering is often required to land a cybersecurity analyst position.
In the 2020 Cybersecurity Career Pursuers Study, conducted by (ISC), over half of the respondents reported holding computer and information science degrees. Of all cybersecurity professionals surveyed, 40% held bachelors degrees in cybersecurity, and 33% had a masters in cybersecurity. An additional 8% held doctoral degrees in the field. Respondents in more senior-level or management positions tended to have postgraduate degrees.
Is a cybersecurity degree worth it? Responses to this survey point to yes. According to (ISC)s report, a bachelors degree is the most common academic credential among cybersecurity professionals. That said, some employers may require only a two-year degree if you also have extensive experience and/or professional certifications.
As an alternative to traditional degrees, you might consider a cybersecurity bootcamp. Bootcamps are accelerated, immersive programs that prepare students to enter the tech sector quickly. Given the intensive nature of bootcamps, however, you may not be able to work while completing your courses.
Depending on the cybersecurity analyst job you are applying for, required experience may range from none for entry-level positions to several years for advanced roles. For many candidates starting careers in cybersecurity, the journey begins with working in lower-level information technology roles.
One specific information technology job that can lead to a cybersecurity analyst role is that of a network and computer systems administrator. These professionals develop their organizations computer networks and systems. They also manage users and maintain system security.
Certifications can hone and validate your skills in cybersecurity. According to the aforementioned (ISC) survey, job-seekers in this field should prioritize cybersecurity and IT certifications.
Two of the most popular professional credentials for cybersecurity analysts include the Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) designation and the CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst (CySA+) certification.
CISSP
The CISSP is one of the most valuable information security certifications. It has been around for over 25 years, and more than 130,000 individuals across over 170 countries are CISSPs. Further, data shows that CISSP-holders are in higher demand and earn more than those without it. CISSPs average a salary of $131,030, according to (ISC).
If youre wondering how to get into cybersecurity with no experience, the CISSP designation is not the answer. This credential serves experienced professionals, highlighting their skills and accomplishments. To qualify, you must demonstrate the equivalent of four years of hands-on experience and have a CISSP-holder vouch for you.
CySA+
For those seeking cybersecurity certifications for beginners, the CompTIA CySA+ credential does not require experience. However, candidates must display skills in multiple areas of cybersecurity.
The certification test includes sections on threat and vulnerability management, software and systems security and incident response. The exam comprises a maximum of 85 questions. Its multiple-choice and performance-based questions must be completed in 165 minutes.
When youre ready to start applying, its time to scour the job boards. One particular platform to consider is Dice, which focuses on careers in tech. Popular sites such as Indeed, ZipRecruiter, Glassdoor and Monster post cybersecurity analyst roles as well.
If you are looking for a career in government, start your search with USAJOBS or Government Jobs.
Cyberseek is an excellent resource as well, offering a heat map to show which states have the highest and lowest need for cybersecurity professionals. The site also has a career pathway flowchart to suggest how your career might progress.
Cybersecurity analysts typically need bachelors degrees in computer and information technology, cybersecurity or related fields.
Becoming a cybersecurity analyst can take as little as two years if you earn an associate in cybersecurity. However, four years is a more reasonable timeframe, as obtaining a bachelors degree and an entry-level certification may help you stand out to employers.
Cybersecurity is a challenging field. Because of the speed at which practices and technologies in the cybersecurity industry change and develop over time, job-seekers in the field must keep up with the newest developments.
More here:
Everything You Should Know About Becoming A Cybersecurity Analyst - Forbes
SPUP Recruitment 2022: Check Posts, Qualification and How to Apply Here – StudyCafe
SPUP Recruitment 2022: Check Posts, Qualification and How to Apply Here
SPUP Recruitment 2022:Sardar Patel University of Police, Security, and Criminal Justice, Jodhpur, has invited online applications from qualified candidates for recruitment to three positions of Senior Scientific Assistant (SSA) and twenty-five positions of Junior Scientific Assistant (JSA) in various divisions of the State Forensic Science Laboratory, Home (Group-1) Department, Government of Rajasthan, under the Rajasthan Forensic Sciences Laboratory Subordinate Service Rules-1980, 2015, and 2020.
Candidates between the ages of 18 and 40 are eligible to apply for these positions. The link to apply online is available on the university website http://www.policeuniversity.ac.in and will be valid until the application deadline of 02.11.2022. Candidates are advised to visit the University website http://www.policeuniversity.ac.in regularly for information about the Exam/ Recruitment. You can send an email to [emailprotected] for clarification/direction/information. The application fee for the General Category is Rs. 950, which is waived for applicants from other categories such as SC/ST/OBC.
The link to apply online shall be available on the University website http://www.policeuniversity.ac.in from midnight of 03.10.2022 to Midnight of 02.11.2022. Candidates are requested to apply for the job post before the deadline. No application shall be entertained after the stipulated time/ date. Incomplete applications and applications received after the specified time/ date shall be REJECTED. All the details regarding this job post are given in this article such as SPUP Recruitment 2022 official Notification, Age Limit, Eligibility Criteria, Pay Salary & much more.
1. Sr. Scientific Assistant
2. Jr. Scientific Assistant
Image
1. Sr. Scientific Assistant (DNA): M.Sc. degree with II division in Zoology or Molecular Biology Biotechnology or Biochemistry or Microbiology or Genetics from an institution recognized by the Government, and Certificate / Diploma in Computer Science/ Computer Application or Degree with at least one subject as Computer Science/ Computer Application from an institution recognized by the Government.
2. Sr. Scientific Assistant (Cyber): M.Tech / M.C.A. / M.E. / M.Sc. degree with II division in Computer Science or Computer Applications from an Indian university recognized by law.
3. Senior Scientific Assistant (Polygraph): Masters Degree with II division in Psychology from an Indian university established by law, and Certificate / Diploma in Computer Science/ Computer Application or Degree with at least one subject as Computer Science/ Computer Application from an Indian university established by law or an institution recognized by the government.
4. Jr. Scientific Assistant (Document): B.Sc. degree in Physics and Chemistry from a university established by Law in India.
NOTE: For more details regarding the qualification, interested candidates are requested to go to the official notification.
1. Sr. Scientific Assistant: 4800 Grade Pay
2. Jr. Scientific Assistant: 3600 Grade Pay
The steps to apply for SPUP Recruitment 2022 are outlined below.
Step 1: Go to the SPUP official website.
Step 2: Search for the SPUP Recruitment 2022 Notification here.
Step 3: Read all of the information in the notification.
Step 4: Apply and submit the application form in accordance with the mode of application specified in the official notification.
To Read the Official Notification Click Here
Disclaimer: The Recruitment Information provided above is for informational purposes only. The above Recruitment Information has been taken from the official site of the Organisation. We do not provide any Recruitment guarantee. Recruitment is to be done as per the official recruitment process of the company or organization posted the recruitment Vacancy. We dont charge any fee for providing this Job Information. Neither the Author nor Studycafe and its Affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Visit link:
SPUP Recruitment 2022: Check Posts, Qualification and How to Apply Here - StudyCafe
B.S. in Computer Science Degree – University of Cincinnati
As a student in the Computer Science B.S.program at the University of Cincinnati, you will gain the skills to design, analyze, and develop technology to improve and modernize life for all.
Some important areas of computer science are: the design of more powerful or more easily used computer languages; the design of more powerful compilers,which translate programs written in computer languages into machine-executable code; the design of operating systems; and the design of networks and methodologies for computing over multiple distributed machines.
At UC College of Engineering and Applied Science (CEAS), its all about you we strive to help develop you into the person employers want to hire. Throughout your time with us, you will:
Admission criteria for this program vary based on a comprehensive review of the relative strength of test scores, class rank and GPA, and co-curricular activities.
First-year students applying to this program should also have completed the following college preparatory subjects:
First-year students must begin the program during fall semester. Applications are accepted on a rolling basis. High school students who wish to be considered for scholarships must apply by December1 of their senior year in high school.
Read the rest here:
Pioneering computer science alumnus battles bankruptcy and more on road to graduation – Oklahoma State University
Wednesday, October 12, 2022
Media Contact: Elizabeth Gosney | CAS Marketing and Communications Manager | 405-744-7497 | egosney@okstate.edu
Miguel Pineda Soto graduated in July as one of the first to earn an online computer science degree from Oklahoma State University. The recent graduate credits the CS program for helping him get to where he is now working full time at Goldman Sachs but it wasn't an easy journey.
Originally from Venezuela, Soto and his family were forced to move to Kuwait when he was 8 due to tightening governmental restrictions.
While it was a tough thing to deal with, moving was a blessing in disguise, said Soto, whose fathers career as a petroleum engineer prompted his early interest in STEM. I learned English and a lot of Arabic and French, and I also got to grow up with an entirely different perspective of the world.
Soto finished high school in Kuwait and followed his dads footsteps, enrolling in pre-engineering at Northeastern A&M College in Miami, Oklahoma. He was able to finish his associate degree there, but during his first year of community college, his parents went bankrupt.
I reached out to hundreds of universities trying to find a way to get enough financial aid to finish my studies given my situation, Soto said. Sadly, none were able to offer enough aid to cover the cost of a foreign student looking to study engineering.
Although Soto did receive a few financial aid offers from a couple of universities, none of them had an engineering program. He took advantage of the opportunities anyway and ended up getting associate degrees in business administration and chemistry at Rogers State University in Claremore, Oklahoma.
After marrying the girl I had been dating for basically the entire time I had been in the U.S., I had the chance to continue pursuing my dream of being in a STEM field, Soto said. I spent all summer researching the best program for me and I decided to go with OSUs online computer science program. I learned an immense amount from the online faculty while living and working full time in OKC and I am honestly so grateful for the fact that this program was available to me.
Soto expressed his gratitude for the programs dynamic and challenging coursework, and the opportunities hes received as a result. Soto also said that regardless of the fact that he was in a different city, he always felt he had immediate access to his professors.
I had him as a student in a couple of my classes, said Dr. Blayne Mayfield, interim head of the Department of Computer Science. He was very enthusiastic and very involved in the class. Some students I dont hear from them all semester long, but I would hear from him quite frequently. He was a very pleasant student to work with.
The CS online program has been progressively implementing online classes for the bachelor's degree for the past four years. Now published and available, students have the ability to work for their degree anywhere they can.
To learn more about the CS online program, visit the Department of Computer Science website here.
Story By: Bella Vu, CAS student intern | bella.vu@okstate.edu
Read the rest here:
3 Big Challenges to Expanding Computer Science Classes and How to Overcome Them – Education Week
Big-name companies like Delta Airlines, UPS, and Starbucks are clamoring for expanding computer science education at the K-12 level. But according to a recent report from the nonprofit Code.org, just 6 percent of high schoolers are enrolled in foundational computer science classes, and only a little more than half of high schools offer the courses.
Experts have identified major hurdles to expanding computer science, including finding and training teachers; big gender and racial disparities in course enrollment; and keeping up with a fast-changing field.
While there are no easy fixes, heres how schools could begin addressing those challenges, according to educators and experts who participated in an Oct. 6 Education Week webinar.
Its a misconception that K-12 curriculum needs to mirror exactly where the technology is at any given moment, said Pat Yongpradit, the chief academic officer at Code.org.
Core concepts like algorithms, programming, data, data science, ethics around technology, artificial intelligence, theyre all the same, no matter the technology, he said.
Its a great problem, because who wants a static curriculum like we see in other subjects? where students often dont grasp the relevance of what they are learning, he said. A fast-changing curriculum keeps things exciting for students.
There are a lot of free resources for teaching computer science, he added. Many are created by Yongpradits own organization, Code.org, but others come from big tech players, like Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and more.
This is a tough one, especially given that there are teacher shortages across the board, said Charity Freeman, the associate director of teacher training for the Discovery Partners Institute at the University of Illinois.
We are looking for a teacher that can stand in front of a classroom and can support students who are already learning computer science, but we also need math teachers and English teachers and social studies teachers, she said. Its kind of hard to prioritize computer science when its acknowledged as an elective when youre still trying to fill vacancies in core subjects.
The Chicago school district, which made computer science a graduation requirement several years ago, has worked with research institutions to develop a sequence of courses to help teachers feel comfortable leading introductory classes. Issues remain, however, because the training doesnt prepare educators to teach more advanced computer science classes, said Kristan Beck, the director of computer science in the districts office of early college and career education.
Whats more, the coursework to obtain a computer science endorsement is rigorous and time consuming. The school district is working with Discovery Partners Institute and others to make it more teacher friendly, Beck said. DPI received a grant from Amazon to provide tuition support for teachers who want to get the endorsement.
Despite these efforts, teacher training remains a struggle for districts, Beck said.
At the elementary level though, teachers may not need extensive training, said Rebecca Gratz, an instructional facilitator in computer science for elementary schools in Loudoun County, Va. Gratz herself has zero background in the subject, she said.
Instead, she used resources like YouTube, Code.org, and BrainPOP, to figure out the basics. Helping elementary teachers offer computer science in their classes is about showing them those resources and helping them develop the confidence that they can do this, Gratz said.
One of the reasons Chicago made computer science a graduation requirement was that the district was looking to change the face of who was in computer science classes, Beck said, to include more females and students of color.
There are now more girls taking the first of two AP Computer Science courses, she said, though the district is still working to get more female students into the second, more rigorous AP class. But the district struggles with getting Black and brown young men into computer science class, Beck said. Were really working hard to really invite those students into this space and show them that they belong here, that theyre welcome, that this is cool.
Students need to be able to see the connection between a career they are interested in that doesnt necessarily seem to involve computer sciencesay, agricultureand computer science topics, Freeman said.
Research shows that familiarizing students with computer science topics in elementary school can smooth the way for participation later on, Gratz said.
If we dont expose them by a certain point in their elementary career, theyre significantly less likely to go into these different courses, and to go into these different paths, she said.
Read the rest here:
3 Big Challenges to Expanding Computer Science Classes and How to Overcome Them - Education Week
Computer science teachers need better pay to avert crisis – Buckeye Institute
This opinion piece was first published by Crains Cleveland Business.
Ohio currently ranks in the bottom half of the country in nearly every relevant computer science metric. That abysmal showing must change and quickly to give today's students a fighting chance as tomorrow's employees in the 21st century economy.
Businesses across the state need employees with computer skills, and the significant gap between available computer-skilled workers and employer demand is only expected to widen over the next decade. To help meet that demand and prepare students for the digital workplace, Ohio elementary and secondary schools need to dramatically improve their computer science curricula.
Studies show that computer science classes help with creative, cognitive thinking and complement math and science coursework. Reforming policy so students can more easily access computer science education would help them perform better in traditional school subjects like math, while preparing them for the jobs of the future that will require computer science skills.
Fortunately, the State Committee on Computer Science recently released 10 recommendations for improving Ohio's computer skills training and education. Among other proposals, the committee suggests requiring high school students to complete at least one computer science course before graduating, changing occupational licensing laws for computer science teachers, and directing education funds to support more computer classes.
All commendable. And if adopted, these recommended steps would improve upon the status quo and further improve on Ohio's revised model curriculum for computer science which was recently updated to help students apply the skills learned in the classroom to jobs in the workforce.
Unfortunately, the State Committee on Computer Science stopped short of proposing the one change that might improve Ohio's K-12 computer programs the most: attracting more computer science teachers statewide by allowing schools to pay them more.
Collective bargaining agreements negotiated between teachers' unions and local school districts determine teacher pay in Ohio public schools. Those agreements designed to ensure fair compensation for teachers have instead contributed to a computer science teacher shortage by preventing computer science teachers from being compensated relative to their private-sector value and employment alternatives.
Akron Public Schools, for example, has already been bitten by the teacher shortage bug across many subject areas and has turned to long-term substitute teachers and social media campaigns to fill the void. These shortages will only become more acute as more students are required to take computer science before graduating.
But better pay will yield more qualified computer science teachers, and a model for allowing higher pay already exists under state law. Ohio currently authorizes school districts to increase compensation for some teachers when local school boards determine that the teachers' subject area suffers a shortage.
Instead of waiting for individual local school districts to recognize the computer science teacher shortage, Ohio lawmakers should proactively expand this authority statewide. Acknowledging a statewide computer science teacher shortage and allowing all public school districts to raise salaries for computer science teachers as needed would help attract and retain more qualified teachers, avert a looming crisis in the classroom, and better prepare Ohio students for successful careers in the digital age.
Taking bold preemptive action now to help our schools hire the teachers they need to teach will help our businesses hire employees with the knowledge and skills they need to do the job. Computer science in school today really will determine the Ohio we have tomorrow.
Kolas is an economic policy analyst with the Buckeye Institutes Economic Research Center.
Excerpt from:
Computer science teachers need better pay to avert crisis - Buckeye Institute