One of the main advantages of Bitcoin is its decentralization. Unlike traditional banking systems where a centralized authority (bank) has control over transactions, bitcoin transactions are validated by a decentralized network of computers. Therefore, there is no single point of failure in the network and no need for a third-party intermediary to validate transactions. This can offer a level of security and transparency that is missing in traditional banking systems.

Another advantage of Bitcoin is its digital nature. As a digital currency, bitcoin can be easily stored, transferred and used for online transactions. This can be especially useful in a country like Sao Tome & Principe where traditional banking infrastructure may not be readily available. Access to Bitcoin can provide a safe and convenient way for people to conduct financial transactions without relying on traditional banking systems.

In addition, bitcoin can provide a hedge against volatile currency fluctuations. Sao Tome & Principes economy is largely dependent on cocoa exports, and the currencys value can fluctuate based on global market conditions. Holding Bitcoin can provide a way for individuals and businesses to diversify their assets and protect against market volatility.

However, there are also risks associated with bitcoin. Its decentralization can lead to anonymity and lack of regulation, which can pose challenges for preventing fraud and illegal activities. Additionally, bitcoins value can be highly volatile, which can lead to significant financial losses for those who invest in it.

Overall, while bitcoin is not a complete solution to Sao Tome & Principes financial challenges, it can offer some advantages in terms of decentralization, digitalization, and protection against currency volatility. It is up to the government to create a regulatory environment that can harness these benefits while mitigating the risks associated with bitcoin..

Bitcoin, the first-ever cryptocurrency, has been on a meteoric rise in recent years. It has emerged as a reliable alternative to traditional financial systems, offering benefits far beyond what traditional financial institutions can provide. The decentralized nature of Bitcoin removes the need for intermediaries, allowing for fast, secure, and low-cost transactions without the need for a central authority.

One of the main benefits of Bitcoin trading is that it provides a level of privacy and anonymity that is not possible with traditional financial systems. Bitcoin transactions are processed using a public ledger known as the blockchain, but this information does not reveal the identity of the parties involved. This makes Bitcoin an ideal option for those who value privacy and confidentiality in their financial transactions.

Bitcoin also offers greater flexibility than traditional financial systems, allowing users to easily make transactions from anywhere in the world without the need for bank accounts or credit cards. This makes it an attractive option for people who live in countries where traditional financial systems are either inaccessible or unreliable.

Moreover, Bitcoins limited supply makes it an attractive investment option for people looking to diversify their portfolios. The total number of Bitcoins that will ever exist is fixed at 21 million, meaning that its value could increase as demand grows. This has made Bitcoin a popular investment asset for a wide array of investors.

Another significant advantage of using Bitcoin trading is the speed with which transactions are executed. Unlike traditional financial systems, which can take several days to process transactions, Bitcoin transactions are processed within minutes. This makes it an especially attractive option for merchants who require quick and efficient payment processing.

Finally, Bitcoin trading provides users with greater control over their finances. Since Bitcoin transactions are processed without the need for a central authority, users are not subject to the restrictions and regulations imposed by traditional financial institutions. This means that individuals have more freedom to manage their money as they see fit, without having to worry about issues like account freezes, transaction limits, and other similar restrictions.

Bitcoin is a revolutionary technology that has the potential to change our financial system in many ways. It can provide an alternative form of currency, increase access to banking services and reduce transaction costs. Despite some limitations, Bitcoin offers numerous benefits that could help it become more widely adopted in the future. As cryptocurrencies become increasingly popular and accepted by mainstream institutions, there will be greater opportunities for people around the world to benefit from this digital asset class. With its unique features such as decentralization, immutability and transparency, we can only expect great things from Bitcoin in coming years..

See the rest here:

Bitcoin's Role in the Financial System of Sao Tome & Principe - The Zimbabwean

MetaMask, one of the leading crypto wallets developed by ConsenSys, recently found itself at the center of a controversy: the platforms new terms and conditions state that MetaMask reserves the right to withhold funds from users wallets to pay taxes.

This has caused turmoil throughout the crypto community

In April 2023, ConsenSys, the developer of MetaMask, introduced significant changes to the platforms terms of use.

The revised terms state that any fees payable by consumers are considered net of taxes, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

In addition, MetaMask explicitly reserves the right to withhold taxes from users wallets if necessary. In essence, these new terms make it the responsibility of MetaMask users to identify and pay all applicable taxes, fees, and government charges.

The introduction of MetaMasks new terms took many users and industry experts by surprise.

One of the co-founders of 1inch, a popular decentralized exchange, raised concerns about MetaMasks authority to withhold fees.

The idea of a cryptocurrency wallet actively participating in tax compliance was seen as a departure from the decentralized ethos that underlies the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Critics argue that MetaMasks actions contradict the principles of financial freedom and individual sovereignty that cryptocurrencies strive to uphold.

The confusion surrounding MetaMasks new terms stems primarily from a lack of clarity about the scope and implementation of the tax withholding process.

Users are wondering what specific criteria determine when MetaMask will withhold funds for taxes and how this information will be communicated to them.

The absence of clear guidelines creates a sense of unease and raises questions about the platforms commitment to transparency.

Striking a balance between compliance and the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies remains a challenge.

It is essential that platforms like MetaMask maintain transparency, provide clear guidelines, and actively engage with the community to address concerns and promote trust.

MetaMasks new terms and conditions, which allow it to withhold consumer funds for tax purposes, have caused quite a stir within the crypto community.

The unexpected change in MetaMasks approach has generated confusion, concern, and criticism from users and industry experts.

Although MetaMask and ConsenSys have attempted to justify their actions as a means to comply with tax regulations, many question the implications for decentralization and financial freedom.

Cryptocurrencies were originally conceived as a means to provide individuals with greater control over their finances, free from the interference of centralized institutions.

However, as the industry matures, it faces increasing scrutiny from governments seeking to impose regulations and ensure tax compliance.

Although the intentions behind MetaMasks tax withholding policy may be rooted in regulatory compliance, the lack of clarity about its implementation raises valid concerns.

Users are unsure of the specific circumstances under which their funds may be withheld, creating a sense of unease and eroding trust in the platform.

Transparency and clarity of communication are key to addressing these concerns and maintaining a strong relationship between MetaMask and its user base.

The reaction of the crypto community to MetaMasks new terms has been swift and decisive.

Many users have used social media to express their disappointment and frustration, questioning the platforms commitment to decentralization and individual sovereignty.

Some even threatened to switch to alternative wallets closer to their ideological beliefs.

One of the key tenets of the new vision for cryptocurrencies is decentralization, which aims to eliminate intermediaries and provide individuals with direct control over their financial assets.

MetaMasks new terms, becoming involved in tax withholding, are seen by some as a departure from this decentralized vision.

Critics argue that the platforms actions undermine the principles of financial freedom and individual empowerment for which cryptocurrencies were designed.

In response to community reactions, MetaMask and ConsenSys issued statements to clarify their intentions and address the concerns raised.

They stressed that the withholding tax clause was included to comply with legal and regulatory requirements imposed by tax authorities.

According to them, MetaMasks intention is not to violate the principles of decentralization or compromise the financial freedom of users.

Rather, they argue that this is a necessary step to ensure compliance with tax laws and regulations.

The controversy over MetaMasks new terms highlights the complex intersection between the cryptocurrency industry and traditional regulatory frameworks.

As cryptocurrencies continue to be adopted mainstream, regulators are taking steps to ensure tax compliance and consumer protection.

In response to the backlash, MetaMask and ConsenSys have sought to clarify their position. They affirm that the tax withholding clause is a necessary measure to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements imposed by tax authorities.

They stress that their goal is not to prevent decentralization or compromise users financial freedom, but rather to strike a balance between regulatory obligations and the evolving needs of the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Going forward, it is imperative that MetaMask and ConsenSys engage with the community in an open and transparent manner. Providing clear guidelines and actively seeking feedback can help address concerns and rebuild user trust.

In addition, working with regulators to find solutions in line with the principles of decentralization and financial freedom could pave the way for a more harmonious relationship between the cryptocurrency industry and regulatory frameworks.

As it continues to evolve, the cryptocurrency industry will likely face additional challenges at the intersection of decentralization and regulation.

Balancing compliance needs with the core values of cryptocurrencies is a delicate task that requires ongoing dialogue and cooperation.

Ultimately, the ability of platforms like MetaMask to address these challenges will determine their long-term success and their ability to uphold the ideals that initially attracted individuals to the cryptocurrency world.

In conclusion, MetaMasks new terms and conditions, particularly regarding the withholding of consumer funds for tax purposes, have caused considerable upheaval within the cryptocurrency community.

The implications for decentralization and financial freedom have raised valid concerns and triggered a backlash against MetaMask and ConsenSys.

The industry must continue to grapple with the complexities of regulatory compliance while preserving the fundamentals of crypto.

Transparent communication and engagement with the community will be essential to shaping the future of MetaMask and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Continue reading here:

MetaMask: new terms on crypto taxes - The Cryptonomist

The Ukrainian government can always justify waging a war against regional grandees as part of the fight against corruption and the desire to prevent Western aid from ending up in the pockets of local clans.

Distinguishing anti-corruption campaigns from political persecution in Ukraine has always been difficult, and even Russias invasion has not changed that. The recent arrest of one of the countrys most influential regional politicians, Odesa Mayor Gennadiy Trukhanov, is the latest episode in a high-profile series of legal proceedings brought against Ukrainian mayors that continues despite the military freeze on political life.

The central government hopes to use the provisions of martial law to root out corruption at the local level while getting rid of inconvenient regional politicians at the same time. Its true that Ukraines mayors are often corrupt, but by targeting individuals, the government is increasingly undermining the very idea of local self-government.

The standoff between the central government and the mayors in Ukraine has been going on since the 2020 local elections: the last major vote before Russias invasion. Back then, President Volodymyr Zelenskys Servant of the People party was defeated in the mayoral elections in key cities. The winners were mostly regional heavyweights that draw their support from local business clans.

At the time, it seemed that these regional elites would be the main challenge faced by Zelensky in the future. By the next parliamentary elections, they intended to form their own political project: a diverse alliance of regional elites with a focus on greater local autonomy.

The standoff continued even after the Russian invasion. In April 2023, Poltava Mayor Oleksandr Mamaiwhose ten-year rule had seen the destruction of historical sites around the city and attacks on activists and even judgeswas fired and given a suspended sentence for embezzlement. Mamai was also eager to exploit Soviet nostalgia in his campaigns, clashing with patriotic voters.

Yet it wasnt just mayors in the predominantly Russian-speaking southeast of the countrywho could be suspected of harboring pro-Russian sympathieswho came into conflict with Kyiv. Chernihiv Mayor Vladyslav Atroshenko was also accused of abuse of power and relieved of his duties over the relatively minor misdemeanor of having used a government vehicle for personal purposes.

His downfall was preceded by a long-running public conflict with the presidential administration. Atroshenko had effectively accused the central government and the local governor of failing to take action when Russia invaded. The mayor himself took part in the citys defense and subsequently received a medal from Zelensky for doing so.

Atroshenko is clearly no angel, and was facing corruption charges even before the war. But his sudden and poorly explained removal from power caused indignation among Poltava residents, 62 percent of whom saw it as the center putting pressure on the local authorities. Other mayors also expressed solidarity with Atroshenko, including Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko.

The most high-profile conflict between Kyiv and local leaders took place in Odesa, where Mayor Trukhanov was arrested in early May over a six-year-old deal. He began his career as a pro-Russian politician, and much has been written in the media about his alleged criminal past and Russian citizenship. Over time, however, the Odesa mayors position became increasingly loyal to Kyiv.

Following Russias invasion, Trukhanov led the citys defense, but the trail of corruption left by him and his team from the very beginning of his tenure eventually caught up with him. Currently out on bail and facing embezzlement charges, he may now lose his post with his duties passing to the secretary of the city council, Igor Koval, a representative of Servant of the People. No elections will be held until the war has ended.

Trukhanovs fate may give another political heavyweight in the southeast, Dnipro Mayor Borys Filatov, pause for thought. Unlike Trukhanov, Filatov has always had a reputation as a staunch Ukrainian patriot, but his relationship with the presidential team has been fraught. During the 2020 local elections, he created ProPosition, dubbed the party of mayors, which was seen as a serious rival for Servant of the People. The war did not put an end to the conflict, and Filatov has criticized Zelenskys team for its autocratic tendencies.

In Kyiv, meanwhile, relations between the presidential administration and the city administration headed by Mayor Klitschko have also been strained since Zelensky came to power. As head of the Association of Ukrainian Cities, Klitschko sees his role as protecting the interests of local authorities, and has made no attempt to conceal his dissatisfaction with the pressure being put on mayors. He has openly supported Trukhanov, accusing the center of the systematic harassment of local government.Within Zelenskys entourage, Klitschko is seen as a serious political rival: his trust rating is 58 percent, fourth in the overall standings. The Kyiv mayor is rumored to be planning to resurrect his UDAR political party and could become the leader of an alliance of disgruntled regional elites and a possible ally of former president Petro Poroshenkos opposition party, European Solidarity. The Klitschko and Poroshenko parties together have a majority in the Kyiv City Council.

As Ukrainian politics begins to come back to life, the conflict between the presidential administration and the Kyiv mayor is only likely to grow. It is safe to assume that the Kyiv mayors office will be targeted at the weakest point of almost any city government: various murky construction schemes, and the inevitable problemsespecially during a warwith public utilities.

Overall, the process of decentralization that began under Poroshenko and initially continued under Zelensky has been fairly successful. The value of regional power grew to the extent that in the much-hyped 2020 local elections, some politicians were prepared to give up their seats in the state parliament in order to become city mayors, such as Kherson Mayor Ihor Kolykhayev, who is now being held prisoner by Russian troops.

Once the country found itself engulfed by a full-scale war, however, the system of government inevitably turned toward greater centralization and the limitation of the powers of local elected authorities in favor of hybrid military-civilian administrations appointed by the president. Experts noted, however, that the decentralization of Ukrainian power had proved to be very efficient at a time of war, making it possible to swiftly resolve defense issues on the ground without waiting for a command from the center.

For Zelenskys administration, putting pressure on powerful mayors is part of the same strategy as deoligarchization and purging the remnants of the countrys pro-Russian political forces. It is simultaneously a fight against the negative legacy of the past, the desire to improve the countrys manageability while it is at war, and preparation for its post-war development.

In this worldview, all the parties consisting of a citys most high-profile residents are less a product of real decentralization than of the old mafia-clan system. The government can always justify waging a war against regional grandees as part of the fight against corruption and the desire to prevent Western aid from ending up in the pockets of local clans.

As in the case of the oligarchs, however, this process also has a downside. When Russia invaded, the elected city mayors remained with their voters, while the same could not always be said of officials appointed by Zelensky. Recent purges included several governors appointed by the center whom the presidential team itself accused of inefficiency, corruption, and embezzlement of humanitarian aid.

By getting rid of managers who may not be perfect but were elected by local residents, the government is setting a dangerous precedent, reinforcing authoritarian tendencies within a political system that is already in stasis. Once the war is over and competitive politics returns, the contradictions between the center and the regions will likely again be at the forefront of Ukrainian politics.

By:

Read the original post:

Ukraine's Other Battle: Zelensky vs. the Mayors - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Monero has been making strides in the cryptocurrency market in recent months, with the latest being partnering with Nyms mixnet. Nyms mixnet is a platform that operates on open-source principles and utilizes incentives to ensure decentralization. Monero announced this new partnership in the just concluded Monerotopia 2023. Monero is a cryptocurrency that employs blockchain technology with safety-enhancing technology.

Through this partnership, users can have anonymity. Additionally, with the rise of new technology, there has been a rise in attacks and the loss of Millions. With the adoption of Nym, they will provide financial security to the users. This is primarily due to the limited availability of privacy safeguards for users of virtual currencies, leaving them vulnerable to financial monitoring.

However, the introduction of these safeguards brings added benefits, such as a reduction in cyber attacks. Monero, in particular, has faced a significant number of cyber attacks in recent years. Nonetheless, through this partnership, users can now breathe a sigh of relief, knowing that their security and privacy are being addressed.

Follow us for the latest crypto news!

According to the Monero team, a group from the Monero community has effectively established a service provider that utilizes the Monero desktop wallet on the Nym mixnet. This makes it easier for Monero users to use NymConnect to carry out transactions over the mixnet, greatly enhancing the privacy of their transactions.

Since its inception, Monero has undergone significant enhancements. These improvements primarily focus on bolstering security, privacy, and user-friendliness. One of the core factors of Monero is that it remains committed to prioritizing privacy and security as its core objectives while also striving to ensure ease of use and efficiency.

It is worth noting, Monero has established partnerships with various merchants, including cryptowerk.com and acceptedhere.io, as well as several exchanges such as Bisq, Local Monero, Hodl Hodl, Kraken, Binance, SimpleSwap, and Morph token. Some well-known companies that sponsor Monero include Tari Labs, Majestic Bank, Fork Networking, Mac Stadium, Cake Wallet, and Symas.

The subject of a recent Reddit discussion among users was the recently implemented cryptocurrency rules in Dubai, which have led to the countrys prohibition on privacy coins like Monero. One of the participants in this conversation shared their opinion that the imposed prohibition would not work to stop people from trading Monero. Another participant in the discussion brought out the alleged absence of reliable decentralized exchanges (DEX) accepting Monero trades, even in 2023.

No spam, no lies, only insights. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Consequently, the discussion indicated a prevailing sentiment among participants who favor Monero and express their desire for the coins usefulness in their daily lives.

Monero(XMR) is currently trading at $150.41 as of the time of writing. The coin has had a 0.04% increase in the past 24 hours. The trading volume of Monero is $65.12 M in the last 24 hours and has a total market cap of $2 .75B. Over the past 12 months, Monero has demonstrated its performance, with increases of 8.1% in the last five days, 8.9% in the previous one month, and 15.5% in the last six months, despite experiencing a decline of 17.7% over the same 12-month period. The coin has been able to outperform prominent cryptocurrencies like Ethereum.

Crypto News Flash does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to cryptocurrencies. Crypto News Flash is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.

Read the original post:

ZCash and Dash Competitor Monero Partners with Industry Giant to ... - Crypto News Flash