Category Archives: Encryption
How to adjust your privacy settings on Signal, and protect your messages with extra encryption and face scans – Business Insider
Signal is a messaging app that's become popular for its security. Every message you send on Signal is protected with end-to-end encryption, meaning that no one can intercept it and breach your privacy.
But despite this encryption, if someone manages to get into your phone, they'll be able to read all your Signal messages freely. That is, unless you enable some of Signal's more advanced privacy options.
Here's how to adjust your privacy settings on Signal to better protect yourself, and beef up Signal's already substantial security.
Though most of Signal's privacy settings are the same on iOS and Android, there are a few settings unique to each operating system.
To get started, open Signal and tap your account avatar at the top-left of the screen. Then tap "Privacy."
Read more from the original source:
How to adjust your privacy settings on Signal, and protect your messages with extra encryption and face scans - Business Insider
The encryption debate is about all of our personal messages and that must be acknowledged – The Independent
Judging by the the simplistic way encryption is so often discussed you'd be forgiven for thinking that the technology is only used by two very specific kinds of people: the worst villains and the best heroes.
The National Crime Agency whose director of threat leadership has just come out with a wide-ranging attack on the technology naturally concentrates its fire on the worst people in society. Rob Jones was speaking after the jailing of a prolific paedophile, and suggested that such convictions would not be possible if Facebook presses ahead with plans to better secure the conversations in its messages.
At the other end of the spectrum are the human rights, press freedom and civil liberty groups that strongly encourage the use of such technologies. They argue that weakening encryption will mean that journalists and activists who have a complicated relationship with the state and other powerful actors will come under threat.
They are both correct. Encryption protects everyone who uses it; as a technology, it has no care for whether it is protecting messages sent by abusers or dissenters. That's because all encryption really does is is make sure that messages aren't intercepted on their way between their sender and recipient; technically, it means that messages are illegible unless you are meant to be able to see them.
That's why concentrating on those extreme ends of the argument will inevitably leavethe vast majority those who use their phones primarily to chat with friends or check their bank balance with little interest or representation in the argument.
The fact is that for every person at the extremes, there are millions of people for whom encryption ensures they remain safe. Every bank transfer that is safe from being intercepted, every message conversation that isn't snooped on, every sensitive picture that is not seen by hackers or spies is thanks to the technology underpinning encryption.
All of those cases need to be part of the argument. Do we agree that it is good our conversations are protected, even if that extends to conversations that we don't think should be happening? Or do we think that it is worth giving up some privacy to make it easier for police and intelligence agencies to do their job? From the way the argument is conducted at the moment, it would be hard to know.
INDY/LIFE NewsletterBe inspired with the latest lifestyle trends every week
INDY/LIFE NewsletterBe inspired with the latest lifestyle trends every week
This is not to say that there is no place for those extreme arguments. How well protected our conversations should be, and whether we want to give up that security for safety through surveillance, is one of the most profound arguments there is.
But if we only talk at the extremes, we miss almost every way that encryption is used. Whichever way we ultimately decide the argument should fall, it must be done with the normal people whose lives it will affect in mind.
Encryption underpins every part of our life; there is no way in which it is a niche technology. The argument over its use should not confine itself to niches either.
Go here to see the original:
The encryption debate is about all of our personal messages and that must be acknowledged - The Independent
Hard Drive Encryption Software Market Structure, Industry Inspection, and Forec – Business-newsupdate.com
The latest Hard Drive Encryption Software market report is a rich resource of top line data and analysis of factors driving the growth of this business sphere. It also encompasses a multitude of risk-averting plans to help businesses indulge themselves in opportunities that can turn in strong profits in the upcoming years. Moreover, the report encompasses verifiable projections for the market its and its sub-markets based on the past and current business setup.
Industry experts cite that Hard Drive Encryption Software market is expected to accrue notable returns, registering a CAGR of XX% over the forecast period 2021-2026.
Moving ahead, the research literature hosts detailed segmentation data, followed by in-depth profiles of leading companies across the various geographies. Additionally, to offer highly accurate representation of the industrys growth patterns, the authors of the report have taken into consideration the impact of Covid-19 pandemic.
Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.business-newsupdate.com/request-sample/21657
Important inclusions in the Hard Drive Encryption Software market report:
Hard Drive Encryption Software market segments covered in the report:
Geographical fragmentation: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East & Africa, South East Asia
Product range: AES256, AES-128 and Others
Application spectrum: Personal and Commercial
Competitive dashboard: Dell, Eset, Gemalto, IBM, Mcafee, Microsoft, Pkware, Sophos, Symantec, Thales E-Security, Trend Micro, Cryptomathic and Stormshield
Points Covered in The Report:
The points that are discussed within the report are the major market players that are involved in the market such as manufacturers, raw material suppliers, equipment suppliers, end users, traders, distributors, etc.
The complete profile of the companies is mentioned. And the capacity, production, price, revenue, cost, gross, gross margin, sales volume, sales revenue, consumption, growth rate, import, export, supply, future strategies, and the technological developments that they are making are also included within the report. The historical data and forecast data from 2021 to 2026.
The growth factors of the market are discussed in detail wherein the different end users of the market are explained in detail.
Data and information by manufacturer, by region, by type, by application, etc., and custom research can be added according to specific requirements. The report contains a SWOT analysis of the market. Finally, the report contains the conclusion part where the opinions of the industrial experts are included.
Recent Industry Trend:
The report contains the profiles of various prominent players in the Global Hard Drive Encryption Software Market. Different strategies implemented by these vendors have been analyzed and studied to gain a competitive edge, create unique product portfolios and increase their market share. The study also sheds light on major global industry vendors. Such essential vendors consist of both new and well-known players. Besides, the business report contains important data relating to the launch of new products on the market, specific licenses, domestic scenarios and the strategies of the organization implemented on the market.
MAJOR TOC OF THE REPORT:
Chapter 1 Industry Overview
Chapter 2 Production Market Analysis
Chapter 3 Sales Market Analysis
Chapter 4 Consumption Market Analysis
Chapter 5 Production, Sales and Consumption Market Comparison Analysis
Chapter 6 Major Manufacturers Production and Sales Market Comparison Analysis
Chapter 7 Major Product Analysis
Chapter 8 Major Application Analysis
Chapter 9 Industry Chain Analysis
Chapter 10 Global and Regional Market Forecast
Chapter 11 Major Manufacturers Analysis
Chapter 12 New Project Investment Feasibility Analysis
Chapter 13 Conclusions
Chapter 14 Appendix
Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.business-newsupdate.com/request-for-customization/21657
See the original post:
Hard Drive Encryption Software Market Structure, Industry Inspection, and Forec - Business-newsupdate.com
Mobile Encryption Technology Market to Deliver Greater Revenues during the Forecast Period until 2027 KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper – KSU | The…
The latest ResearchMoz report on the Global Mobile Encryption Technology Market offers complete study of all factors responsible for the growth of this market during forecast period of 2021 to 2027. The study presented in this report covers data on drivers and restraints of the market for Mobile Encryption Technology. This aside, it sheds light on various historical trends along with their impact on the overall market growth. In addition to this, the report provides dependable forecasts on potential trends in the global Mobile Encryption Technology market.
This study offers detailed data on shares, volume, and revenue of the global Mobile Encryption Technology market during forecast period of 2021 to 2027. This aside, the assessment presents all technological advancements and product development activities in the market. The information provided in the report on Mobile Encryption Technology market works as a guide for industry players while making strategic moves to expand their businesses. The report on the market for Mobile Encryption Technology is helpful for various other important entities such as end-use industries, opinion leaders, investors, and policy makers.
Ask For Sample Copy of This Research Report @ https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2799269
The report covers reliable data on key players together with competitive landscape of the Mobile Encryption Technology market during the tenure of 2021 to 2027. In addition to this, it delivers data on various strategies including alliances, joint ventures, product launches, regional expansions, partnerships, collaborations, and research and development activities by key players. The study also provides analysis on the impact of these strategies on the development of the Mobile Encryption Technology market in the years ahead.
The report on the Mobile Encryption Technology market includes information on the strategic collaborations. The study also mentions the key players across the Mobile Encryption Technology market. Here are some prominent participants involved in the Mobile Encryption Technology market: McAfee (Intel Corporation), Blackberry, Deutsche Telekom, ESET, Sophos, Symantec Corp, Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd., Dell, IBM, Mobileiron, BeiJing Zhiyou Wangan Tech. Co. Ltd, CSG,Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Proofpoint, Inc., Silent Circle, Adeya SA
Mobile Encryption Technology Market Segmentation
The report contains the market size with 2020 as the base year and an annual forecast up to 2027 in terms of sales (in million USD). For the forecast period mentioned above, estimates for all segments including type and application have been presented on a regional basis. We implemented a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches to market size and analyzed key regional markets, dynamics and trends for different applications.
Mobile Encryption Technology Market Segment by Type:
Mobile Encryption Technology Market Segment by Application:
Get Special Discount On This Report : https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=D&repid=2799269
This study has a great analysis on the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has changed the overall growth projections across various markets. The Mobile Encryption Technology market has also observed various changes in terms of functioning and growth rate. These details have been included in the report.
This study includes regional prospects of the Mobile Encryption Technology market. The details related to the geographical landscape have been studied with scrutiny by the researchers and the data has been included in this study. The regions covered in this report are:
* North America: U.S., Canada, Mexico* South America:Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Ecuador, Peru, Colombia, Costa Rica* Europe:U.K., Germany, Italy, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Denmark* APAC:China, Japan, Australia, South Korea, India, Taiwan, Malaysia, Hong Kong* Middle East and Africa:Israel, South Africa, Saudi Arabia
If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as per your requirements.
Contact For Any Query or to Get Customized Report: https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2799269
Why choose us?
Researchmoz efficiently delivers strategic reports aiming to serve our customers with everything they require. All our business intelligence solutions that we provide or offer through third parties help them achieve this end. Our seasoned analysts sometimes double as consultants to provide analytics-driven insights, and help you move ahead of your competitors. The expertise that tens of thousands of reports contain strive to offer tailor-made solutions to meet your emerging needs. The analytics-driven insights benefit not only C-suite fraternity but also those working at front end. We help decipher the trends and proclivities of people to help companies understand their clients.
Top Trending Reports:
About ResearchMoz:
Researchmoz is the one stop online destination to find and buy market research reports & Industry Analysis. We help enterprises of all sizes and from wide range of Industries Bridge the gap between success and failure, mainly through insights and analytics solutions offered in our reports. Researchmoz has a dedicated team to identify the most prominent aspects of business landscape and develop a framework in including them in the ongoing reports. All our business intelligence solutions that we provide or offer through third parties help them achieve this end. Our seasoned analysts sometimes double as consultants to provide analytics-driven insights, and help you move ahead of your competitors. The expertise that tens of thousands of reports contain strive to offer tailor-made solutions to meet your emerging needs. We help decipher the trends and proclivities of people to help companies understand their clients.
For More Information Kindly Contact:
ResearchMozTel: +1-518-621-2074USA-Canada Toll Free: 866-997-4948Email: sales@researchmoz.usFollow us on LinkedIn: https://bit.ly/1TBmnVGFollow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/researchmozMedia Release: https://www.researchmoz.us/pressreleaseBrowse More Reports Visit @http://marketresearchlatestreports.blogspot.com/
Facebooks proposed move to end-to-end encryption threat to child protection – Yahoo Finance UK
The Daily Beast
Noah Seelam/AFP via GettyThis story was produced in partnership with Coda Story.On the evening of Oct. 8, Father Stan Swamy took a break from watching TV and came down to the ground floor of Bagaicha, the Jesuit community center he founded in the eastern Indian town of Ranchi, Jharkhand. The 83-year-old priest and social activist was chatting with colleagues when an SUV pulled up outside.Four officers from the National Investigation Agency, Indias counter-terrorism task force, burst into the roomone of them holding a gun. Six more stood outside, and another police vehicle waited about 200 meters away. The officers spoke quietly to Swamy, seized his mobile phone and asked him to pack a bag.A colleague asked for an arrest warrant, but none was presented.The next morning, Swamy was driven to Ranchi airport and put on a two and half hour commercial flight to Mumbai, where he was remanded into custody by a special NIA court until Oct. 23. The agency filed a 17,000-page charge sheet on the same day, accusing him of links to the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist), which the Indian government views as a terrorist organization.Swamy, who was detained under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), is the oldest person to be accused of terrorism in India. To him, the arrest came as no surprise. Police had raided his residence in 2018 and 2019 and confiscated his laptop, tablet, mobile phone, a hard drive, some thumb drives, CDs and documents.As a prominent human rights campaigner who has spent decades fighting for the rights of marginalized and indigenous people (Adivasis), Swamy was the latest arrest in a sprawling 2018 case that has seen 16 human rights activists accused of being in league with the CPI (Maoist).Maoist fighters and Indian forces have engaged in conflict in central and eastern India for five decades. More than 12,000 people have been killed in the violence in the past 20 years. The rebels say they are fighting for the rights of indigenous people and landless farmers in the mineral-rich region, but the state regards them as outlaws and violent extremists.Among the individuals arrested in the 2018 case under the UAPA, a broadly worded antiterrorism law that gives the authorities powers of investigation and detention, are a prominent scholar of Indias caste system, a professor of linguistics and an 81-year-old poet. All have one thing in common: they have spent their lives campaigning for the rights of so-called low-caste Hindus, minority Muslims and other vulnerable Indians. All have been repeatedly denied bail and are accused of conspiring with banned Maoist militants to incite unrest. All deny the charges.Twitter Helps Indias Nationalist Government Block DissentThe detentions are linked to clashes that broke out on January 1, 2018, in the village of Bhima Koregaon in the western Indian state of Maharashtra. Hundreds of thousands of Dalitslower-caste Hindus, once known as untouchablesgathered to mark the 200th anniversary of the victory of Dalit soldiers in the British Army over an army of the upper-caste Peshwa dynasty. The commemoration was disrupted by a mob waving saffron-colored flags, the symbol of the Hindu nationalists who dominate Prime Minister Narendra Modis government.The nationalists objected to the Dalits, who commemorate the battle as an important chapter in their ongoing struggle against Indias caste system, celebrating a victory by British colonial forces. At least one person died in the resulting violence and several were injured.Police investigations quickly latched onto a complaint that the violence was instigated by Maoists during a public rally attended by 35,000 people in Maharashtra the previous day. Police claimed to have discovered Maoist plots to assassinate Modi and overthrow his government. Police have so far arrested 16 activists, who are accused of being Maoist conspirators and inciting hate which contributed to the violence at the Bhima Koregaon commemoration.The governments case against Swamy rests on digital evidence discovered on his electronic devices and the devices of three more of the accused. According to the NIA, investigators discovered letters encouraging an uprising against a fascist government purportedly written by Swamy to Maoist leaders.Swamy is also accused of writing letters to Maoists advocating that they capture senior leaders of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party in protest against a controversial anti-conversion law introduced in Jharkhand in 2017, with stiff jail sentences and fines for those found guilty of forcing anyone to change their religion. Human rights groups say the law targets Christian, Muslim, and other minority groups, including Adivasis, in an effort to enshrine Hindu culture and practices.Other letters allegedly show that Swamy received $110,000 from an associate to help the Maoists. The priest denies having ever sent any such messages.Mihir Desai, Swamys lawyer, claims the discovery of the letters points to the possible use of spyware. Eight people connected with the case were previous targets of spyware attacks. One such incident used malware tools from the controversial Israeli surveillance tech firm the NSO Group.Surveillance from hacking tools provided by companies like the NSO Group has become a hallmark in crackdowns on minority groups and activists around the world. The NSO has previously been linked with helping numerous governments to zero in on human rights activists, lawyers and journalists, in countries including Mexico, France, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.Speaking of Swamy during a telephone conversation, Desai said, These letters have not been emailed from his computer, neither have they been found in his deleted files. Please understand these are not emails. If its an email, youd find it on the senders email or device, as well as the receivers.In a video recorded by his colleagues days before his arrest and uploaded to YouTube by Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha, a coalition of progressive human rights organisations, Swamy said officers from the NIA had questioned him over five days in July and August. He said they had produced "some extracts" of letters allegedly taken from his computer that linked him to the CPI (Maoist). Swamy described the letters as "fabrications" that were put onto his computer.We are all aware how prominent intellectuals, lawyers, writers, poets, activists, student leaders they are all put in jail just because they have expressed their dissent or raised questions about the ruling powers of India, he added.Desai insists that the letters were planted on Swamys devices and added that the priest had ample reason not to have written them.Why would he create these files just to keep them on his computer, when he knows hes been under scrutiny for the last two years? he asked. His house was raided twice and he was questioned about his links with Maoists. Why would he still not delete these letters? He wouldnt do this unless hes a complete fool. Nihalsing Rathod is a junior lawyer who has been working with Surendra Gadling, a human rights lawyer who was also arrested in this case. Rathod said he once received suspicious emails from the poet Varavara Rao and the activist lawyer Arun Ferreira, both of whom were arrested in August 2018 after they were accused of being Maoist conspirators in the Bhima Koregaon violence. The communications arrived before their arrests.These emails looked suspicious and I had the good sense of not opening them. I called the senders instead, he said. They told me they had never sent me any email and got worried about a possible hacking.Suspicions of hacking are common in the arrests. In June 2020, the Canada-based Citizen Lab and Amnesty International released a report detailing how nine people, including Rathod, were targeted with malicious emails and messages. The investigation identified 12 spearphishing emails, messages which looked authentic because they appeared to come from a trusted source, sent between January and October 2019. All came from email accounts masquerading as belonging to journalists, officials from local courts or an activist that may have been known to the targets.These spearphishing emails attempted to use a PDF document to deliver NetWire, a commercially available spyware program capable of compromising Windows computers in order to monitor their actions and communications. Citizen Lab was unable to determine who was behind the attacks.Shalini Gera, an Adivasi rights activist and lawyer for one of those accused, also received similar emails. Ive been racking my brains over this: Why me?, she said. Look at all the others who have been targeted, the only thing that ties us together is Bhima Koregaon.Eight of the nine people targeted by the spyware are helping defend people arrested in the Bhima Koregaon case. Three of themRathod, Gera, and another Adivasi rights activistwere also targeted by another campaign that, according to Citizen Lab, used a program called Pegasus, a surveillance tool used by the NSO Group, to attack their WhatsApp accounts.Once installed, Pegasus can copy vast amounts of previously inaccessible data from smartphonesincluding contacts, voice calls, texts, emails, location and any data transmitted over apps including Facebook, WhatsApp and Skype. Pegasus can even turn on a phones camera, microphone and GPS to track a targets location and movements.Citizen Lab was unable to determine the extent of the breaches in both attacks and WhatsApp filed a lawsuit against the NSO Group in 2019. While the company says it does not operate any technology it provides to governments, the Modi administration has dodged questions on whether it has ever used Pegasus.Rathod claims that the evidence against Gadling was fabricated by the government. His suspicions were given some weight in December 2019, when the Indian magazine The Caravan reported that police may have edited files on Gadlings devices. The publication obtained clone copies of his computers from the police. They also found that the computer of another of the accused contained malware that could be used to plant files remotely.For Desai, finding evidence of electronic tampering is proving difficult. He is still trying to press the courts to give him access to clone copies of the devices seized from Swamy.Until the police provide clone copies of the hard disks, it is impossible to find out when and how the planting of evidence happened, he said.Swamy has campaigned against the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for many years. The legislation has been criticised for erasing presumption of innocence, allowing the state to unilaterally declare anyone arrested a terrorist and incarcerate them without trial or bail.In 2019, India had 5,134 active cases under the law and the number of people being detained is rising every year. Critics claim the legislation has often been used to target religious minorities and marginalized communities, including Adivasis. A 2015 research paper by Swamy found that over 3,000 Adivasis have been falsely accused of being Maoists and are imprisoned in Jharkhand under the UAPA, or similar laws. Swamy is currently suing the state of Jharkhand over delays to those trials.In the video he posted before his arrest, Swamy linked his pro-Adivasi work to his arrest. This became a bone of contention with the state and they want to put me out of the way. And one easy way was to implicate me in some serious cases, he said.The historian and writer Ramachandra Guha believes that the Bhima Koregaon case can be characterised by the abuse of power by the state. The Bhima Koregaon case rests on dubious and manufactured evidence and is an extreme example of the ruling party abusing the power of the state to persecute its critics, he said, via email.It adversely affects the rights of Adivasis, Dalits, Muslims, as well as of independent writers, journalists and civil society activists of all backgrounds.Meanwhile, lawyers involved in the case fear they are still being surveilled.I assume that my mobile phone is tapped, said Desai. With the present government, anybody in my line of workhuman rights that iswould assume it. Catholic nuns hold placards during a protest against the arrest of Father Stan Swamy. Noah Seelam/AFP via Getty When Adivasi activist Dayamani Barla first met Swamy in Ranchi 20 years ago, she noticed his involuntary tremors.He was holding a glass of water but his hands shook so much that it wouldnt reach his mouth, she said.Those movements are caused by Parkinsons disease.His detention has united thousands of prominent Indians to push for his release. Immediately after Swamys arrest, a group of 2,000 scholars and activists signed a statement calling for his release. Recently, several high-profile individuals, including UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet, member of parliament Shashi Tharoor and Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren have made similar appeals.The courts have rejected bail applications from all of the accused, including Swamy, multiple times. Right-wing Hindu nationalists have described Swamy and his 15 co-accused and their educated supporters as invisible enemies of India.Desai spoke to Swamy by telephone in mid-November. Stan said he was doing ok but he didnt sound very well. Stan is a bold man; he was trying to sound bold.In a handwritten letter to his friends in January to mark 100 days in prison, Swamy expressed gratitude for the public goodwill he has received. At times, news of such solidarity has given me immense strength and courage, especially when the only thing certain in prison is uncertainty, he said.This story was produced in partnership with Coda Story.Read more at The Daily Beast.Get our top stories in your inbox every day. Sign up now!Daily Beast Membership: Beast Inside goes deeper on the stories that matter to you. Learn more.
Continued here:
Facebooks proposed move to end-to-end encryption threat to child protection - Yahoo Finance UK
Email Encryption Market Analysis, Top Companies, New Technology, Demand and Opportunity Forecast 2026 The Bisouv Network – The Bisouv Network
Introduction This dedicated research report on the global Email Encryption Market is designed to cover important aspects of the market such as market size and size, market trends, investment strategies, pricing structures, and analysis by drivers providing real-time access to all aspects. Therefore, despite fierce competition in the global Email Encryption Market, we encourage market players operating in global and regional domains to make profitable business decisions and drive optimal revenue generation. Comments on analysts investing in large-scale research activities. In addition, in order to adequately meet the needs of investors to successfully discover the devastating effects of the global pandemic COVID-19, this dedicated research report presentation seeks to design a competent and agile return journey that will successfully carry out business activities.
A thorough reference to pricing strategy, supply chain derivatives, production and capacity status, trade relationships, import and export ratios are well highlighted in the report to encourage business discretion and analyze the Email Encryption Market using a variety of methodologies such as PESTEL. In addition to analysis, we thoroughly evaluate the industry through SWOT analysis and PORTERs five forces analysis.
Some of the Important and Key Players of the Global Email Encryption Market:
Micro Focus (UK), Symantech (US), Cisco (US), Trend Micro (Japan), Sophos (UK), Proofpoint (US), BAE Systems (UK), Zix (US),Entrust Datacard (US), Mimecast (UK), Egress Software (UK), Intemedia (US), Virtru (US), Echoworx (Canada), Lux Sci (US), Cryptzone (US).
Request for a sample copy of this research report @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/1054?utm_source=re
Leading internal and external growth promoters, in-house R&D veterans and research, including rigorous and aggressive investments by administrative initiatives, diverse market participants, market participants, and ambitious new entrants seeking seamless integration in the global Email Encryption Market space. The report also focuses on the threat potential of product replacement and the prognosis for growth. This report is designed to encourage relevant business decisions to address the current crisis, and some frontline players, contributing players, and stakeholders are working on accurate epidemic management action plans.
A review of market competitors, portfolio of premium products and services, dynamic trends and technological advances representing the high-end growth of the global Email Encryption Market. The report identifies advanced developments, key segments and subsectors that are likely to witness high potential growth over the next few years. This report contains details of precise research methodologies and best practices that generate high revenue despite fierce competition in the global Email Encryption Market. We tend to keep up with concurrent technological advances in industries, including various developments and innovations that are widespread throughout the industry.
Global Email Encryption Market 2020-26: Competitive Landscape Analytical Review
It also provides details on the latest mergers, acquisitions, and industry trends and includes a feasibility analysis of new projects to assist stakeholders. The report presents figures related to the growth of the industry over the forecast period, market shares and production patterns of various markets and submarkets by region. The global Email Encryption Market research evaluates all major and small aspects of the industry. The report cites various methodologies, market statistics, Email Encryption Market in-depth case studies, market revenue, consumption, gross margin, cost structure, exports, production processes, imports, market capacity, market share and many Email Encryption Market networks, etc.
https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/industry-reports/email-encryption-market?utm_source=re
1. Carefully crafted and compiled on the ongoing development of the global Email Encryption Market, this article has summarized relevant details about the current state of competitive intensity.
2. Details of new technology integration, new product launches and diversification, in-depth analysis of key market players, and potential entry for new players are also covered in the report as appropriate.
3. In addition, for the interest of readers, the report also includes details on key industry developments and player activities, including details on mergers and acquisitions, mergers and cooperation, and all commercial contracts were best evaluated in the report.
Contact Us :
Ryan JohnsonAccount Manager Global3131 McKinney Ave Ste 600, Dallas,TX75204, U.S.A.Phone No.: USA: +1 972-362 -8199/ +91 9665341414
See the original post:
Email Encryption Market Analysis, Top Companies, New Technology, Demand and Opportunity Forecast 2026 The Bisouv Network - The Bisouv Network
Cornami and Inpher deliver Fully Homomorphic Encryption to modern innovators – Help Net Security
Cornami and Inpher announced their partnership to collaborate on delivering commercially viable Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) functionality to the market.
FHE has long been described as transformative for data privacy and cloud security as it enables computing on encrypted data sets, thereby keeping the underlying data secure. However, existing FHE algorithms are computationally intensive and have been often considered as not yet practical for real world applications.
Cornamis partnership with Inpher overcomes such limitations to deliver real-time FHE computing to a ready and rapidly expanding market.
Inpher is a cryptographic Secret Computing company that powers privacy-preserving AI and analytics. Secret Computing has brought years of academic research in secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) and FHE into commercially-ready applications.
With Secret Computing technology, data scientists can finally build advanced analytics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) models on distributed data sources without ever exposing or transferring sensitive data across departments, organizations, or jurisdictions.
Secret Computing ensures that data privacy and security are retained under the privacy requirements of organizations during these computations, including being GDPR compliant.
Cornami has developed a break-through computing-hardware architecture that massively scales application performance without penalties to deliver real-time computing for critical and complex applications that are out of reach of traditional, legacy processors.
The Cornami technology reduces power and latency while vastly increasing the compute performance for todays immense datasets requiring real-time computing.
Cornamis unique and scalable computational fabric is the first compute platform weve seen that can meet FHEs substantial computing requirements hitting both performance and cost requirements for a commercially viable product.
We look forward to working with Cornami to provide unrestricted FHE solutions to the market, said Dimitar Jetchev, CTO and co-founder of Inpher, Inc.
The two companies are collaborating to enable Inphers advanced cryptographic products, in which data remains protected while being processed, to execute on the Cornami computing platform.
Cornamis unique next-generation post-von Neumann architecture enables massive parallelism and pipelining capabilities at scale, delivering compute-intensive FHE for commercially viable real-time products and services.
Commercially viable FHE provides quantum-secure privacy-preserving computing on encrypted data sets, keeping the underlying data secure. In essence, assume that computing environments are compromised; so, secure the data.
The data, including its unrestricted computational derivatives, remain encrypted at rest and throughout its processing life cycle. Data is only decrypted to plaintext in data owner-controlled environments.
FHE is based on notoriously hard mathematical lattice problems that are secure against attacks even by quantum computers. This feature allows provable data security even in untrusted computing environments like public cloud platforms.
Datasets from single or multiple sources can be encrypted using the same public FHE key. The data is then aggregated into an encrypted database, where AI (both training and inference) and analytic algorithms can be applied at commercially viable speeds.
Results can be decrypted by a third-party without ever exposing plaintext data. This feature enables the cooperation of multiple, independent organizations such as healthcare companies, governments, financial institutions and more to gain insights into their collective data while preserving the privacy of that datas contents.
In order to achieve value from data analytics, including those driving the AI and ML market, the industry needs to address the protection of the data.
Massive security breaches bring regulatory pressure to restrict data collection and cloud-based information with the realization that regardless of effort, with existing perimeter-based security measures, computing environment attack points will always exist.
The cryptography experts at Inpher have developed quantum-safe cryptographic primitives and protocols to encrypt data and perform arbitrary computation on that encrypted data that returns an encrypted result.
Combining both Cornami and Inpher technologies will enable future-proof and provable data security. These are mathematical computationally-intensive algorithms highly unsuitable for the processors of today.
We greatly value our partnership with Inpher to enable for the first time the performance required to deliver commercially viable FHE products in real-time, said Paul Master, CTO and co-founder of Cornam.
Cornami and Inpher have completed several technical exploratory milestones to understand their harmonious fit. Both companies are engaged in delivering market ready solutions that address multiple customers needs to compute on encrypted datasets.
Go here to read the rest:
Cornami and Inpher deliver Fully Homomorphic Encryption to modern innovators - Help Net Security
Army Ant Limited Announces the Release of Its Encryption Mixer ANTUSDT – Yahoo Finance
ANTUSDTANTUSDTANTUSDT
LONDON, Feb. 10, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Recently, Army Ant has announced the release of its encryption mixer (coin shuffle), ANTUSDT.
"Weak Anonymity" vs. "Black Money", which one would users prefers? Digital currency is actually not completely anonymous (pseudo-anonymity), so the encryption mixer was born ANTUSDT.
The digital currency address will not be linked to a real identity in real life, but if it is not done properly, it will. People can trace back to a particular transaction by associating multiple nodes in the blockchain, and then through the analysis of blockchain data and KYC/AML data, people can know who sent the transaction, and even include more details, such as location, reason of the transaction and so on.
The principle of coin shuffle:
What is coin shuffle?
Speaking of digital currency, it is easy to think of its two characteristics, one is decentralization, the other is anonymity. But the anonymity of cryptocurrencies is limited.
Although real-name authentication is not required, and the users real identity cannot be matched by the address, the transaction on the blockchain is public. If someone deliberately looks for it, some clues can also be found through big data analysis, unless everyone is like Satoshi Nakamoto who is as cautious as possible. However, there is a service that can provide users with sufficiently high privacy protection, that is, coin shuffle services.
Coin shuffle, as the name implies, is to mix coins from different issuing addresses and then send them out. Through this process, the correspondence between the output address and input address of a transaction is cut off, thereby better protecting the privacy of users.
In fact, the process of coin shuffle is like a lot of people throwing coins into the wishing pool. If everyone throws in coins of 1 yuan, then people can know how many 1-yuan coins who throws in at what time, but when the staff cleans these coins and sorts them out, people cannot tell which coin was thrown in by whom.
Story continues
Since the Bitcoin blockchain is a public ledger, it records every transaction on the Bitcoin network, and after coin shuffle, it is impossible to know which incoming transaction should correspond to which outgoing transaction. It is difficult to find out where and how much the cryptocurrency of the trader is stored, which protects user privacy to the greatest extent.
Under normal circumstances, coin shuffle for multiple times, with a small number of coins each time, is better.
Conclusion:
Coin shuffle is a privacy protection function, and coin shuffle transactions are difficult to track. The funds are mixed with the funds of other users, and a random relationship is created between the existing user's account system and the new account after coin shuffle. This mechanism can realize the anonymity of transactions and the anonymity of all services.
ANTUSDT platform advantages
According to market research, all coin mixers on the market are open to merchants, and ANTUSDT is the only coin mixer that is open to merchants and retail investors.
ANTUSDT's business scope also includes: cryptocurrency collection agenting, payment agenting, coining cash lending, coining currency borrowing, multi-country and multi-platform acceptance, etc.
How does ANTUSDT coin shuffle make profit
Merchants need to use the corresponding currency, retail merchants supply and merchants use, and merchants give corresponding commissions (to ensure that the fund pool has sufficient spare assets to provide and withdraw coins, every coin shuffle requires the user to actively authorize it, only by obtaining the user's authorization can assets can assist in coin shuffle.
Cooperative merchants have paid a deposit equivalent to 25 BTC and a full liquidity deposit of more than 5 times to ensure zero risk in ANTUSDT business.
Introduction of ANTUSDT rules
Ordinary users can earn coin shuffle commissions by participating in two-coin shuffle methods through a single authorization.
ANTUSDT cross-chain coin shuffle
ANTUSDT creates a large-scale coin shuffle pool, which gathers the most circulating currencies on the market.
Join the cross-chain coin shuffle via authorization, their assets will be mixed with hundreds of thousands of cryptocurrencies around the world. Through countless asset interactions, the traces of funds of participating users can be completely concealed to achieve the effect that the ocean can bleach ink.
ANTUSDT has a large number of cooperative merchants. The coin shuffle pool can handle a large number of assets with privacy requirements 24 hours a day, and provide encrypted whereabouts and currency exchange services for assets. Every time ordinary users are authorized to participate in cross-chain coin shuffle, they can obtain the commission earned by the coin shuffle pool.
Reciprocating acceptance coin shuffle
Join reciprocating acceptance coin shuffle via authorization, their assets will be on standby at any time for major merchants to call, during which their assets may switch between various currencies. After applying for the call, the user needs to press the "Re-exchange" button in the order on the coin shuffle details page.
Large merchants will restore their assets to the original digital currency within the specified time and pay the corresponding commission.
In the fiat currency world, this problem can be traced back to a real legal case in the 17th century. The conclusion of the case is that-if users receive a banknote involved in theft, the police will later investigate that the banknote was stolen and traded several times before it reaches their hand. In this case, the police have no right to take this banknote from their account. The same is true for digital currencies. What does it matter if users receive a coin that is not stolen by them?
Media contact
Company: Army Ant Limited
Contact: Hagimoto Madoka
E-mail: vip@antusdt.com
Address: 29 CLEMENTS ROAD ILFORD LONDON UNITED KINGDOM IG1 1BH
YouTube: https://youtu.be/alffT8t2oOs
Telegram: @antusdt001
Website: https://www.antusdt.com/
SOURCE: Army Ant Limited
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/164aa13b-3e4b-4565-a795-88d7050efdcd
Read this article:
Army Ant Limited Announces the Release of Its Encryption Mixer ANTUSDT - Yahoo Finance
A natural process may hold the clue to secure encryption of communications – Research Matters
Solid particles suspended in a fluid are bombarded on all sides by particles of the fluid. They change their direction of motion haphazardly, and the distances they travel between one such collision and another are not predictable. Hence, their motion is said to be random. Discovered by the botanist Robert Brown in 1827 and named after him, Albert Einstein theoretically explained Brownian motion in 1905. According to the theory, it is impossible to trace the motion of individual particles of the solid, which introduces inherent randomness to the particles motion.
Generating a truly random sequence of numbers holds the key to secure encryption of data. However, the task remains a challenge. Although computer scientists rely on several numerical techniques to generate random numbers, the methods always introduce a small degree of predictability in the sequence. In a new study, researchers from the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Kolkata, have used the naturally occurring Brownian motion to generate random numbers. Funded by the Department of Science and Technology and Ministry of Human Resource and Development, Government of India, the study was published in the journal Frontiers in Physics.
The researchers first suspended plastic particles about 3 microns in diameter in a mixture of water and common salt. They tracked the individual particles using a laser focused on these particles, at a rate more than thousand per second. The laser they used does not affect the Brownian motion of the particle it probes, relying on the invention called optical tweezers, which was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2018. The researchers recorded the position of the individual particles in a computer and studied their motion.
Any instrument used in the laboratory first needs calibration that is, the parameters that determine the instruments behaviour need to be quantified to enable reliable measurements. First, the researchers used the position of the individual plastic particles to calibrate the optical tweezers. They used a numerical technique called machine learning on the data they had collected. It first used a section of the data to identify the numerical parameters responsible for driving different kinds of motion of the particles. Then, it used the rest of the data to identify those parameters that accurately described the motion they had observed. The researchers demonstrated that indeed, the optical tweezers they used were behaving as expected. When small anomalies arose, the researchers showed that these deviations would not affect the data they recorded for the particles motion.
The researchers used their machine learning technique to demonstrate that the plastic particles indeed undergo random motion in the salt-water solution. They showed that when they measured the parameters relevant to the motion using their method, the results match those of traditional techniques, such as the Fourier transform, named after its discoverer Joseph Fourier. Their approach, however, requires minimal human interaction.
Thus, we provide new insights on calibrating Optical Tweezers, says Raunak Dey, the lead author of the study.
The researchers then used the trajectory of the individual particles to generate a sequence of numbers. They conducted a series of 15 standard tests of the randomness of a sequence of numbers. The tests tell us whether a string of numbers qualifies as random, and also allows us to judge the extent of randomness, shares Raunak. The researchers concluded that indeed, the numbers are random up to a high degree of confidence. They further showed that if the rate at which the laser observes the particles is higher, it gives them increasingly more certainty about the randomness of the sequence. We have directly borrowed these random numbers from nature instead of relying on artificial algorithms, adds Raunak.
The numerical technique also enabled them to independently calculate the parameters of the fluid in which the particles moved, like how much internal friction it offers for its flow. They demonstrated that these independent measurements agree with the well-known values for the fluid. It can have interesting implications. Measuring fluid parameters is difficult for certain biological fluids, like living cells, or fluids which sometimes behave like a solid, like molten lava.
It is difficult to use conventional techniques to study these special fluids, but we can now apply our technique on these systems, Raunak signs off.
This article has been run past the researchers, whose work is covered, to ensure accuracy.
The rest is here:
A natural process may hold the clue to secure encryption of communications - Research Matters
What Is End-to-End Encryption, and Why Does It Matter? – How-To Geek
Titima Ongkantong/Shutterstock.com
End-to-end encryption (E2EE) ensures that your data is encrypted (kept secret) until it reaches an intended recipient. Whether youre talking about end-to-end encrypted messaging, email, file storage, or anything else, this ensures that no one in the middle can see your private data.
In other words: If a chat app offers end-to-end encryption, for example, only you and the person youre chatting with will be able to read the contents of your messages. In this scenario, not even the company operating the chat app can see what youre saying.
First, lets start with the basics of encryption. Encryption is a way of scrambling (encrypting) data so that it cant be read by everyone. Only the people who can unscramble (decrypt) the information can see its contents. If someone doesnt have the decryption key, they wont be able to unscramble the data and view the information.
(This is how its supposed to work, of course. Some encryption systems have security flaws and other weaknesses.)
Your devices are using various forms of encryption all the time. For example, when you access your online banking websiteor any website using HTTPS, which is most websites these daysthe communications between you and that website are encrypted so that your network operator, internet service provider, and anyone else snooping on your traffic cant see your banking password and financial details.
Wi-Fi uses encryption, too. Thats why your neighbors cant see everything youre doing on your Wi-Fi networkassuming that you use a modern Wi-Fi security standard that hasnt been cracked, anyway.
Encryption is also used to secure your data. Modern devices like iPhones, Android phones, iPads, Macs, Chromebooks, and Linux systems (but not all Windows PCs) store their data on your local devices in encrypted form. Its decrypted after you sign in with your PIN or password.
RELATED: Why Does Microsoft Charge $100 for Encryption When Everyone Else Gives It Away?
So encryption is everywhere, and thats great. But when youre talking about communicating privately or storing data securely, the question is: Who holds the keys?
For example, lets think about your Google account. Is your Google datayour Gmail emails, Google Calendar events, Google Drive files, search history, and other datasecured with encryption?
Well, yes. In some ways.
Google uses encryption to secure data in transit. When you access your Gmail account, for example, Google connects via secure HTTPS. This ensures that no one else can snoop on the communication going on between your device and Googles servers. Your internet service provider, network operator, people within range of your Wi-Fi network, and any other devices between you and Googles servers cant see the contents of your emails or intercept your Google account password.
Google also uses encryption to secure data at rest. Before the data is saved to disk on Googles servers, it is encrypted. Even if someone pulls off a heist, sneaking into Googles data center and stealing some hard drives, they wouldnt be able to read the data on those drives.
Both encryption in transit and at rest are important, of course. Theyre good for security and privacy. Its much better than sending and storing the data unencrypted!
But heres the question: Who holds the key that can decrypt this data? The answer is Google. Google holds the keys.
Since Google holds the keys, thismeans that Google is capable of seeing your dataemails, documents, files, calendar events, and everything else.
If a rogue Google employee wanted to snoop on your dataand yes, its happenedencryption wouldnt stop them.
If a hacker somehow compromised Googles systems and private keys (admittedly a tall order), they would be able to read everyones data.
If Google was required to turn over data to a government, Google would be able to access your data and hand it over.
Other systems may protect your data, of course. Google says that it has implemented better protections against rogue engineers accessing data. Google is clearly very serious about keeping its systems secure from hackers. Google has even been pushing back on data requests in Hong Kong, for example.
So yes, those systems may protect your data. But thats notencryption protecting your data from Google. Its just Googles policies protecting your data.
Dont get the impression that this is all about Google. Its notnot at all. Even Apple, so beloved for its privacy stances, does not end-to-end encrypt iCloud backups. In other words: Apple keeps keys that it can use to decrypt everything you upload in an iCloud backup.
Now, lets talk chat apps. For example: Facebook Messenger. When you contact someone on Facebook Messenger, the messages are encrypted in transit between you and Facebook, and between Facebook and the other person. The stored message log is encrypted at rest by Facebook before its stored on Facebooks servers.
But Facebook has a key. Facebook itself can see the contents of your messages.
The solution is end-to-end encryption. With end-to-end encryption, the provider in the middlewhoever you replace Google or Facebook with, in these exampleswill not be able to see the contents of your messages. They do not hold a key that unlocks your private data. Only you and the person youre communicating with hold the key to access that data.
Your messages are truly private, and only you and the people youre talking to can see themnot the company in the middle.
End-to-end encryption offers much more privacy. For example, when you have a conversation over an end-to-end encrypted chat service like Signal, you know that only you and the person youre talking to can view the contents of your communications.
However, when you have a conversation over a messaging app that isnt end-to-end encryptedlike Facebook Messengeryou know that the company sitting in the middle of the conversation can see the contents of your communications.
Its not just about chat apps. For example, email can be end-to-end encrypted, but it requires configuring PGP encryption or using a service with that built in, like ProtonMail. Very few people use end-to-end encrypted email.
End-to-end encryption gives you confidence when communicating about and storing sensitive information, whether its financial details, medical conditions, business documents, legal proceedings, or just intimate personal conversations you dont want anyone else having access to.
End-to-end encryption was traditionally a term used to describe secure communications between different people. However, the term is also commonly applied to other services where only you hold the key that can decrypt your data.
For example, password managers like 1Password, BitWarden, LastPass, and Dashlane are end-to-end encrypted. The company cant rummage through your password vaultyour passwords are secured with a secret only you know.
In a sense, this is arguably end-to-end encryptionexcept that youre on both ends. No one elsenot even the company that makes the password managerholds a key that lets them decrypt your private data. You can use the password manager without giving the password manager companys employees access to all your online banking passwords.
Another good example: If a file storage service is end-to-end encrypted, that means that the file storage provider cant see the contents of your files. If you want to store or sync sensitive files with a cloud servicefor example, tax returns that have your social security number and other sensitive detailsencrypted file storage services are a more secure way to do that than just dumping them in a traditional cloud storage service like Dropbox, Google Drive, or Microsoft OneDrive.
Theres one big downside with end-to-end encryption for the average person: If you lose your decryption key, you lose access to your data. Some services may offer recovery keys that you can store, but if you forget your password and lose those recovery keys, you can no longer decrypt your data.
Thats one big reason that companies like Apple, for example, might not want to end-to-end encrypt iCloud backups. Since Apple holds the encryption key, it can let you reset your password and give you access to your data again. This is a consequence of the fact that Apple holds the encryption key and can, from a technical perspective, do whatever it likes with your data. If Apple didnt hold the encryption key for you, you wouldnt be able to recover your data.
Imagine if, every time someone forgets a password to one of their accounts, their data in that account would be wiped out and become inaccessible. Forget your Gmail password? Google would have to erase all your Gmails to give you your account back. Thats what would happen if end-to-end encryption was used everywhere.
Here are some basic communication services that offer end-to-end encryption. This isnt an exhaustive listits just a short introduction.
For chat apps, Signal offers end-to-end encryption for everyone by default. Apple iMessage offers end-to-end encryption, but Apple gets a copy of your messages with the default iCloud backup settings. WhatsApp says that every conversation is end-to-end encrypted, but it does share a lot of data with Facebook. Some other apps offer end-to-end encryption as an optional feature that you have to enable manually, including Telegram and Facebook Messenger.
For end-to-end encrypted email, you can use PGPhowever, its complicated to set up. Thunderbird now has integrated PGP support. There are encrypted email services like ProtonMail and Tutanota that store your emails on their servers with encryption and make it possible to more easily send encrypted emails. For example, if one ProtonMail user emails another ProtonMail user, the message is automatically sent encrypted so that no one else can see its contents. However, if a ProtonMail user emails someone using a different service, theyll need to set up PGP to use encryption. (Note that encrypted email doesnt encrypt everything: While the message body is encrypted, for example, subject lines arent.)
RELATED: What Is Signal, and Why Is Everyone Using It?
End-to-end encryption is important. If youre going to have a private conversation or send sensitive information, dont you want to make sure that only you and the person youre talking to can see your messages?
Read the original post:
What Is End-to-End Encryption, and Why Does It Matter? - How-To Geek