Category Archives: Encryption

Global Banking Encryption Software Market Surges to $4.31 Billion by 2028, Fueled by Rising Cybersecurity Concerns and Digital Payment Adoption -…

DUBLIN, Nov. 6, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- The"Banking Encryption Software Market by Component, Deployment Mode, Enterprise Size, Function, and Region 2023-2028" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

Research and Markets Logo

The global banking encryption software market has reached an impressive milestone, achieving a market size of US$ 2.1 billion in 2022. Projections indicate robust growth, with the market anticipated to surge to US$ 4.31 billion by 2028, reflecting a remarkable compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.70% during the forecast period of 2023-2028.

Several factors are driving this expansion, including the increasing adoption of digital payment technologies, a rising number of cyberattacks, and the growing demand for enhanced data security and safety within the banking and financial sector.

Banking encryption software serves as a crucial tool for secure transaction handling, encompassing various encryption types such as disk, communication, file, folder, and cloud encryption. It ensures the confidentiality of transaction details, offering high-level security, hassle-free services, privacy protection, and real-time notifications. Moreover, this software prevents sensitive information leaks and mitigates the risks associated with fraudulent activities like hacking and threats. It plays a pivotal role in reducing financial losses and optimizing business operations efficiently and cost-effectively.

Furthermore, banking encryption software aids in maintaining the confidentiality of data, improving data integrity, and fostering consumer trust. It also assists businesses in streamlining processes and achieving compliance with legal requirements. As a result, banking encryption software enjoys widespread adoption among both small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large corporations worldwide.

Banking Encryption Software Market Trends:

The market's growth is strongly influenced by several key trends, including:

Story continues

Digital Payment Technologies: The increasing utilization of digital payment methods, such as credit and debit cards, and mobile banking, on a global scale, is driving the demand for banking encryption software.

Data Management: Businesses across various industries are adopting banking encryption software to gain valuable insights and improve data management.

Cybersecurity: The rising prevalence of cyberattacks, especially among fintech institutes, is fueling the adoption of banking encryption software for enhanced security.

Data Privacy Regulations: Governments worldwide are encouraging the use of banking encryption software by implementing data privacy laws to safeguard against data theft, creating lucrative growth opportunities for industry investors.

Data Security and Safety: Increasing demand for data security and safety among banks and financial institutions is a significant driver of market growth.

AI-Based Solutions: The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)-based banking software for improved efficiency and effectiveness is bolstering market growth.

Cloud-Based Encryption: The use of cloud-based encryption, providing secure remote access to information, is further supporting market expansion.

Key Market Segmentation:

The market analysis includes the following key segments:

Component:

Deployment Mode:

Enterprise Size:

Function:

Regional Insights:

North America: (United States and Canada)

Largest market for banking encryption software, driven by growing demand for data privacy and security, rising cyberattacks, and supportive government initiatives.

Asia Pacific: (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia, Indonesia, and others)

Europe: (Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Russia, and others)

Latin America: (Brazil, Mexico, and others)

Middle East and Africa

Competitive Landscape:

The competitive landscape of the global banking encryption software market includes key players such as Broadcom Inc., ESET spol. s r.o., International Business Machines Corporation, McAfee, LLC, Sophos Ltd., Thales Group, Trend Micro Inc., WinMagic, and more. These companies are at the forefront of innovation and development in the industry, ensuring robust competition and continued advancements in banking encryption technology.

Key Questions Answered in This Report:

How has the global banking encryption software market performed so far, and how will it perform in the coming years?

What are the drivers, restraints, and opportunities in the global banking encryption software market?

What is the impact of each driver, restraint, and opportunity on the global banking encryption software market?

What are the key regional markets?

Which countries represent the most attractive banking encryption software market?

What is the breakup of the market based on the component?

Which is the most attractive component in the banking encryption software market?

What is the breakup of the market based on the deployment mode?

Which is the most attractive deployment mode in the banking encryption software market?

What is the breakup of the market based on the enterprise size?

Which is the most attractive enterprise size in the banking encryption software market?

What is the breakup of the market based on the function?

Which is the most attractive function in the banking encryption software market?

What is the competitive structure of the global banking encryption software market?

Who are the key players/companies in the global banking encryption software market?

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/aner90

About ResearchAndMarkets.comResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

Media Contact:

Research and MarketsLaura Wood, Senior Managerpress@researchandmarkets.comFor E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

Logo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/539438/Research_and_Markets_Logo.jpg

Cision

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-banking-encryption-software-market-surges-to-4-31-billion-by-2028--fueled-by-rising-cybersecurity-concerns-and-digital-payment-adoption-301978962.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

Follow this link:
Global Banking Encryption Software Market Surges to $4.31 Billion by 2028, Fueled by Rising Cybersecurity Concerns and Digital Payment Adoption -...

Outdated cryptographic protocols put vast amounts of network traffic … – Help Net Security

Cryptography is largely taken for granted rarely evaluated or checked a practice that could have devastating consequences for businesses as attack surfaces continue to expand, the cost of a data breach rises year-over-year, and the age of quantum computing nears, according to Quantum Xchange.

Examining more than 200 terabytes of network traffic or the total sum of all packets, for all connections, between all pairs up to 80% was found to have some defeatable flaw in its encryption and 61% of the traffic unencrypted.

56.5% of the single, bi-directional TCP or UDP connections analyzed are unencrypted, compared to 43.4% of encrypted connections.

Old, outdated cryptographic protocols TLS 1.0 and SSL v3 are still in wide use today with industries like healthcare and higher education slow to change. More alarming still, up to 92% of all traffic on a hospital network uses no encryption at all. This suggests a laissez faire attitude and general reluctance to update working systems that are in production.

Strong cryptography is a basic requirement for insurance coverage. It is frightening to see healthcare falling so far behind.

45% of host pairs communicate via an unencrypted channel. 87% of encrypted, host-to-host relationships still use TLS 1.2, demonstrating that a large migration to TLS 1.3 is still forthcoming not a trivial upgrade given the significant differences between versions.

Industries, such as healthcare, have a significant long tail of TLS 1.1 and 1.0 usage, even SSL v3 can be found at scarily high volumes. This suggests an if it aint broke dont fix it attitude and a general reluctance to update working, albeit outdated, systems that are in production.

These findings serve as a snapshot of whats taking place within enterprise systems worldwide, said Vince Berk, Chief Strategist at Quantum Xchange. Zero trust is meaningless if your encryption is not bulletproof. Were trying to bring awareness to the here-and-now problem with cryptography so that organizations can shore up these weaknesses and better protect their systems from everyday cybersecurity risks and yet-to-be-discovered threats.

See the original post here:
Outdated cryptographic protocols put vast amounts of network traffic ... - Help Net Security

What is Moore’s law, and how does it impact cryptography? – Cointelegraph

Moores law, explained

A fundamental concept in the technology sector, Moores law foretells the exponential rise in computing power over time and is named after Gordon Moore.

Gordon Moore, the co-founder and emeritus chairman of Intel Corporation, proposed Moores law in 1965. According to him, the number of transistors on microchips the fundamental building blocks of electronic devices will double roughly every two years while their production costs will stay the same or even go down. The consequences of this exponential rise in processing capacity for several facets of an individuals digital life are vast. How does Moores law predict the exponential growth of computing power?

Cryptography is a crucial field where Moores law is applied. The possible computational capacity for encryption and decryption grows along with processing power as a result of transistor density being doubled.

For instance, as computers get more powerful, cryptographic techniques that were formerly thought to be extremely secure may become vulnerable to attacks. Therefore, stronger encryption techniques and longer key lengths are being developed to guarantee the security and privacy of digital communications.

Moores law explains the computing industrys tremendous improvements, making it possible to produce smaller, more powerful, energy-efficient electronic products. This technological advancement significantly impacts several industries, including entertainment and healthcare.

Additionally, it stimulates economic growth through innovation, creates new markets for goods and services, and increases the effectiveness of existing ones. Maintaining a competitive edge in the market requires keeping up with Moores law, as those who adopt the newest technology get the most benefits.

Moores laws exponential increase in processing power has beneficial and detrimental effects on the encryption industry.

Cryptographers can create more advanced and reliable encryption methods by taking advantage of rising processing capabilities. They can develop encryption algorithms with larger key lengths and more difficult mathematical operations to make it more difficult for potential attackers to decrypt data. Additionally, improvements in cryptography may result in better cyber threat defense and improved security for sensitive data.

On the negative side, potential foes benefit from the quick increase in processing capability, which can decrease the time needed to break encryption keys and weaken security. Data secrecy may be at risk because once-secure cryptographic techniques may become outdated more quickly. To maintain efficient data protection, the field of cryptography must keep up with technological developments in computers.

Moores law influences blockchain technology by presenting prospects for scalability, security and energy efficiency, but it also raises issues that need to be resolved to maintain blockchain networks decentralization and integrity.

Moores laws prediction of constant doubling of computing power makes it possible for blockchain networks to grow successfully, supporting higher transaction volumes and larger data sets.

Moores law encourages the development of more secure cryptographic methods, even though it can provide prospective attackers with more computing capacity to attempt attacks on blockchains. Blockchain data can be protected using more robust encryption techniques, increasing its threat resistance and preserving system confidence.

Furthermore, the increased energy efficiency of hardware, driven by Moores law, can potentially reduce the environmental footprint of blockchain networks. The development of specialized hardware, such as ASICs, benefits blockchain stability. However, Moores law presents challenges like the potential centralization of blockchain networks.

Blockchain networks can store more data, such as smart contracts and transaction histories, without dramatically raising costs thanks to the growth in storage capacity as facilitated by Moores law. This makes it possible for blockchain technology to be used in more complex and robust ways than merely for cryptocurrencies.

Moores law has influenced the development and general accessibility of cloud computing.

Moores law significantly impacts the capabilities and architecture of cloud computing services. The ever-expanding capabilities of server technology allow cloud providers to offer increasingly powerful virtual machines and data storage at affordable prices.

It also encourages the broad use of cloud computing for various applications, from data storage and processing to machine learning and artificial intelligence. This allows organizations and individuals to find more effective and affordable solutions.

However, this increase in processing power also highlights how crucial data security and privacy are since more potent hardware may result in more sophisticated cyber threats and the requirement for enhanced encryption and security measures in the cloud.

Moores law continues to be a major force behind technological advancement, even with modifications to account for the rapidly changing semiconductor industry and its considerable effects on the security and scalability of cryptocurrencies and blockchain networks.

Moores law continues to be debated and discussed in the technology sector. Its important to note that Moores original theory has already undergone changes in practice, and some experts contend that it no longer accurately captures the rate of advancement in semiconductor technology.

The underlying principles of constant technical growth and innovation continue to drive progress in semiconductor technology, even though the exponential increase in transistor count on a microprocessor every two years might not be as steadfast as it used to be.

Moores law served as a guide for the advancement of classical computing technology, but quantum computing represents a paradigm shift that has the potential to continue the trend of exponential growth in computational power for particular problem domains, albeit with its own set of difficulties and constraints.

However, Moores law is still relevant from the perspective of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. Secure cryptographic algorithms are necessary for cryptocurrencies to protect transactions and uphold the blockchains integrity. While Moores law has improved processing power, strengthened encryption techniques, and improved blockchain security, it has also presented difficulties.

Due to the continual rise in processing power, which could simplify the efforts of malicious individuals attempting cryptographic attacks and potentially compromise the security of blockchain networks, cryptocurrencies have had to evolve and adapt their security measures. To counteract the benefits provided by Moores law, this has led to the development of more durable cryptographic algorithms like Advanced Encryption Standard and a focus on longer key lengths.

Additionally, theres been a shift to longer key lengths, for example, in RSA encryption, with lengths such as 2048 or 3072 bits. Longer keys make cryptographic procedures substantially more complex, making it much more difficult for attackers to decrypt data without the right key.

Therefore, the applicability of Moores law depends on how one understands its original formulation. The industrys objectives are still very much centered on the development of more potent, energy-efficient and inventive computing technology, even though the exact doubling of transistor count may have slowed.

Read more:
What is Moore's law, and how does it impact cryptography? - Cointelegraph

How to Secure the 5 Cloud Environment Types – eSecurity Planet

eSecurity Planet content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.

Organizations have a variety of options for cloud deployments, each with its own set of capabilities and security challenges. In this article, we will explore the key characteristics, security threats, and best security practices for five key cloud security environments: public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, multi-cloud, and multi-tenant cloud.

A public cloud architecture is a shared infrastructure hosted by a cloud service provider. Public clouds enable multiple businesses to share resources from a shared pool over the internet. The provider hosts and manages the environment, allowing for scalability and cost-efficiency. The responsibility for protecting these cloud resources is shared, with the cloud provider responsible for infrastructure security and customers responsible for access, application security, and data management. Users have a large responsibility for maintaining the integrity of their cloud environments under this shared responsibility paradigm.

While public cloud systems offer scalability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency, they can also pose significant risks if not properly secured. All cloud (and IT) environments share common security issues and solutions, but for public cloud users, compliance, access control, and proper configuration practices are some of the most important.

How they occur: Unauthorized access to sensitive data can happen as a result of vulnerabilities and misconfigurations such as flawed access permissions or unprotected data and instances.

Prevention: Implement robust encryption, access restrictions, data categorization, secure connections, and an incident response strategy.

How they occur: Improperly configured permissions can allow unauthorized individuals to access applications and data, possibly leading to data leaks and breaches and other security risks.

Prevention: Apply the concept of least privilege or zero trust, conduct frequent access audits, and use Identity and Access Management (IAM) tools.

How they occur: Vulnerable APIs and inadequately protected cloud interfaces allow for exploitation, potentially resulting in data leakage and breaches.

Prevention: API security practices and tools, perform regular vulnerability testing, and enforce strict access controls.

How it occurs: Attackers acquire unlawful access using stolen user credentials, which could result in unauthorized account and data access and misuse.

Prevention: Require multi-factor authentication (MFA), educate users on password security, and regularly monitor accounts for suspicious activities.

How it occurs: Without sufficient logging and monitoring, detecting security incidents in real time becomes difficult, leaving the cloud environment susceptible.

Prevention: Activate cloud logging and use SIEM systems to continually monitor network and system activity.

How they occur: Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks overload cloud and network systems, interrupting access and triggering service disruptions.

Prevention: DDoS attacks may be prevented and mitigated by using DDoS protection services, installing traffic filtering, and deploying content delivery networks (CDNs) to handle extra traffic.

How it occurs: Inadvertent data deletion, corruption or theft can result in irreversible data loss, disrupting operations and exposing sensitive data that could also violate data privacy regulations.

Prevention: Back up data on a regular basis, develop data classification and retention policies, utilize versioning features, use Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tools, and teach employees about data management and policy adherence.

Consider the following methods for increased security in a public cloud setting:

Also read:

A private cloud environment dedicates resources to a single business, allowing for greater control, privacy, and security. Private clouds offer the additional assurance of data, applications and assets being isolated inside a dedicated environment. Still, private cloud security requires many of the same measures as other cloud environments.

A mix of technology, processes, and strategic planning is required to handle these challenges of private cloud security.

How they occur: Private clouds still need to be configured properly, and misconfigurations can lead to exposed data, accounts, applications and other assets.

Prevention: Conduct frequent security audits and vulnerability assessments, and automate configurations wherever possible to reduce human error. Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) is one good tool for making sure that cloud environments are configured properly.

How it occurs: A lack of redundancy can cause system disruptions.

Prevention: Make sure your cloud environment includes redundancy, failover measures, and load balancing.

How they occur: Compliance issues can be somewhat easier in private clouds, particularly if they can avoid geographical data location issues, yet compliance challenges still exist.

Prevention: Keep up with compliance needs by utilizing Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) tools.

Consider the following ways to help ensure the security of private cloud systems.

Also read: What is Private Cloud Security? Everything You Need to Know

A hybrid cloud architecture integrates both public and private clouds. It enables businesses to take advantage of the flexibility of public cloud resources while keeping sensitive data in a private cloud. Data exchange across the two environments is possible, providing a balance of cost-efficiency and security. That flexibility introduces complexity, however, and hybrid cloud security must combine on-premises and cloud security controls to protect data both within and between environments.

Hybrid clouds enable enterprises to benefit from the scalability and flexibility of public clouds while protecting more sensitive data within their own infrastructure. However, hybrid cloud security brings particular challenges.

How they occur: As identifying roles and responsibilities is critical in hybrid clouds, shared responsibility can lead to misunderstandings and unintended security weaknesses.

Prevention: Understand your responsibilities and manage data, access, and application security across all environments, including incident response.

How they occur: Managing application security across multiple environments requires consistent rules, controls, authentication, and monitoring in order to prevent possible vulnerabilities and ensure compliance throughout the hybrid configuration.

Prevention: Integrate security into early development (Shift Left) and track issues and fixes with DevSecOps tools.

How they occur: Because hybrid clouds disseminate data across multiple locations, the danger of illegal access or data exposure increases.

Prevention: The intricacies of data encryption, data classification, and access control require careful management. Use encryption techniques to safeguard data in transit and at rest and use DLP and access management tools to control risks.

How they occur: Meeting compliance standards across hybrid settings with multiple vendors and architectures may be difficult.

Prevention: Preventive measures include activating cloud providers built-in compliance capabilities, centralizing compliance and auditing, and automated monitoring and reporting.

How it occurs: Integrating cloud systems can be difficult because of the variety of technologies, potential conflicts, and the need to ensure continuous data flow.

Prevention: Plan integration carefully, maintain seamless data flow, and use API and configuration best practices to secure data across all environments.

There are a number of ways to properly secure hybrid cloud environments while maintaining their advantages.

Also read: What Is Hybrid Cloud Security? How it Works & Best Practices

Multiple public and private clouds are used concurrently in multi-cloud environments. Their design is decentralized, with apps and data dispersed across several cloud providers. Redundancy, cost minimization, and flexibility are all advantages, but maintaining security across various providers may be complicated, requiring uniform security solutions, policies and practices for protection.

Enterprises confront a variety of difficulties in exchange for the flexibility and scalability benefits of multi-cloud environments, not the least of which is a significantly larger potential attack surface. These are some of the major multi-cloud security threats.

How it occurs: Attackers acquire unauthorized access to cloud accounts, which may result in data theft, resource manipulation, and other malicious actions.

Prevention: Even in the case of stolen credentials, strong authentication and access controls and proper configuration management can help secure cloud accounts.

How they occur: With data scattered across many cloud environments, the risk of unauthorized access, data leaks, and breaches rises.

Prevention: Implement strong access controls and authentication and make sure that each cloud instance is properly configured.

How they occur: With a greater cloud attack surface to defend, DDoS attacks can be harder to prevent.

Prevention: For continued service availability, implement DDoS prevention and mitigation methods such as traffic filtering, infrastructure hardening, and overprovisioning.

How they occur: Unsecured accounts and excessive permissions can allow unauthorized access, data disclosure, and resource exploitation.

Prevention: Preventive measures include appropriately configuring IAM policies, conducting regular audits, following the principle of least privilege, and securing privileged accounts.

How they occur: Using third-party suppliers and services in a multi-cloud system might introduce extra risks, and the risk extends to software dependencies in the software supply chain.

Prevention: To successfully manage these risks, third-party risk management (TPRM) tools are a good place to start.

How it occurs: Multi-cloud has many of the same challenges as other cloud computing approaches, only multiplied across more environments.

Prevention: Prioritize visibility and monitoring technologies that can track risks across cloud environments.

See also:

Securing multi-cloud setups requires thorough planning and a well-defined strategy. There are a number of considerations and approaches.

Read more: What Is Multi-Cloud Security? Everything to Know

A multi-tenant cloud architecture is the most common public cloud architecture. It allows multiple customers, or tenants, to utilize the same environment while keeping their data separate. This architecture is frequently used in infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and platform as a service (PaaS) environments, where data exchange is carefully managed to maintain security and isolation. The degree of multi-tenancy varies based on the architecture of the cloud service provider and the individual needs of users or organizations.

While multi-tenancy provides considerable cost savings and resource efficiency, it also raises a number of security and privacy challenges. These issues must be addressed in order to ensure the safe coexistence of multiple uses inside shared cloud environments.

How they occur: Vulnerabilities, weak passwords, misconfigurations, and API and access control issues matter more than ever in multi-clouds.

Prevention: Strong access management, authentication, encryption, proper configuration, and employee training all play a role, and technologies like DLP can detect problems early.

How it occurs: Inadequate tenant isolation might lead to data contamination or illegal access.

Prevention: Improve tenant isolation by using virtualization, proper controls and configurations, and cloud network segmentation.

How they occur: Meeting regulatory criteria can be made more difficult due to shared resources, data commingling,and even the geographical location of cloud services.

Prevention: Make sure your cloud service provider can meet your specific compliance needs, and DLP and automated data classification can help implement the right controls for the right data.

Access restrictions, data segregation, and compliance must all be prioritized when it comes to securing multi-tenant cloud settings. Consider the following strategies:

Read more: Multi-Tenancy Cloud Security: Definition & Best Practices

Every type of cloud environment public, private, hybrid, multi-cloud, and multi-tenant has its own set of risks and demands. From the shared responsibilities of public cloud to the tailored protection of private clouds, the strategic balance of hybrid cloud, and the challenges of multi-cloud and multi-tenant environments, adopting robust security measures is critical for protecting data and ensuring compliance and business continuity. The good news is that cloud service providers are generally pretty good at securing their environments. By doing their part and applying best practices for each environment, businesses may protect their data and resources while reaping the benefits of cloud computing.

RecoveryManager Plus is an integrated backup and recovery solution for your Exchange Online, on-premises Exchange, and Google Workspace mailboxes. Backup and restore all items in your mailboxes, including all attachments. Export entire Exchange Online and on-premises Exchange mailboxes or just a part of it as a PST file and secure them with a password for an additional layer of security. Try free for 30 days!

Learn more

BDRCloud, a cloud-based service from BDRSuite offers secure, reliable, and scalable cloud backup solutions for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Servers, Endpoints, and Applications. Seamlessly backup and restore critical data from the BDRCloud at your convenience. With customizable policies for scheduling, retention, backup encryption, and multiple recovery options, BDRCloud ensures your data is always secure and accessible.

Learn more

Continue reading here:
How to Secure the 5 Cloud Environment Types - eSecurity Planet

Reconciling HDCP With AV-over-IP Open Standards – AV Network

Everyone in the AV community knows HDCP, the high-bandwidth digital content protection protocol. Love it or loathe it, HDCP is now part of everyday AV working lives. It was designed by Intel and adopted by Hollywood as the method by which valued content is secured, primarily to prevent piracy in a real-time environment. In other words, whilst content is being played, as opposed to whilst moving a file. The focus is on the transmission channel, providing protection as content passes from source to sink.

HDCP addresses this with three interlinked systems: Authentication, Encryption, Key Revocation

Simply put, HDCP only allows content to move to endpoints that are legitimate and authenticated HDCP receivers and then protects the content whilst in motion. This uses a system of encryption keys that work together to secure the link.

The original scope perceived the signal distribution as being point-to-point, circuit-switched connectionsvia connectors like DVI, HDMI, DisplayPort, and across cables and matrices.

All security systems are challenges for people who try to break them. Each of the three HDCP sub-systems, authentication, encryption, and revocation were targets. Devices that stripped the protection soon became available. A master key that could not be revoked found its way into circulation. And thus, despite legal action, the original HDCP system was defeatedbut nonetheless was still required for compliance.

The advent of increasing resolutions and the emergence of AV-over-IP raised both an additional challenge and an additional opportunity. UHD was the new value to be protected and there would now be a much larger number of endpoints involved, (i.e., multicast). Further, due to being transmitted via a network, the connections were now packet-switched, not a continuous connection.

HDCP evolved from v1 to v2, but this was not a backward-compatible step because the content transmission architecture was different. Several parameters were left as optional alternatives. One of the aspects that was not tied down for this multi-endpoint network environment was how to transfer HDCP messages between source and sinks. The consequence is that for direct connections (e.g., HDMI to HDMIfrom player to display) all brands do it the same way, but for network connections, it tends to be same brand at both ends.

Enter IPMX. IPMX is, by design, moving high-quality videoright up to and including uncompressed UHD60across networks. But the same brand at both ends is not compatible with its interoperability ethos. So, a consistent method for exchanging keys needed to be defined.

Most people think that the protection provided by encryption is reinforced by not revealing the method used. The magic of modern encryption methods is that they know exactly how it is protectedeven telling them how it is done, such as putting it in an open standardand yet they still cant decrypt it with the resources they have. The HDCP protocol itself addresses exactly that. Their method of using the keys is rigorous. To bring inter-brand HDCP to the IPMX multicast environment, the Video Services Forum (VSF) has made a significant contribution in proposing the HDCP Key Exchange Protocol (HKEP). This is a standardized approach, or method in common of transferring the already defined messages between IPMX transmitters and receivers. Additionally, it defines the closing down process for a single HDCP session in that same multicast network environment.

The methodology that VSF has recommended in TR-10-5, for use in IPMX, is compatible with everything that has been agreed to so far yet is lightweight enough to be incorporated into devices that may be varied, and probably limited in processing power (to keep their cost down). The extension to the already established HDCP specs covers the exchange of HDCP control messages over TCP/IP among NMOS-based transmitters and receivers. You can think of it as a preamble to the existing HDCP protocol v2.3 which prescribes how to transfer parameters, left optional by DCP, should be used in the IPMX environment.

Go here to see the original:
Reconciling HDCP With AV-over-IP Open Standards - AV Network

What impact does Telegram’s heavy encryption have on performance? – TickerTV News

What impact does Telegrams heavy encryption have on performance?

Telegram, the popular messaging app known for its emphasis on privacy and security, has gained a reputation for its robust encryption protocols. While this level of security is undoubtedly a boon for users concerned about their privacy, it begs the question: what impact does Telegrams heavy encryption have on performance?

Encryption, defined: Encryption is the process of encoding information in such a way that only authorized parties can access it. In the context of messaging apps like Telegram, encryption ensures that messages and other data are protected from unauthorized access.

Telegrams encryption is based on the MTProto protocol, which employs end-to-end encryption to secure user communications. This means that messages are encrypted on the senders device and can only be decrypted the intended recipient. While this level of security is commendable, it does have implications for performance.

One of the primary impacts of Telegrams heavy encryption is increased data usage. The encryption process adds additional data to each message, resulting in larger file sizes. This can lead to higher data consumption, especially for users on limited data plans or in areas with slow internet connections.

Furthermore, the encryption process itself requires additional computational resources. As a result, devices may experience a slight delay when sending or receiving messages, particularly when dealing with large files or in areas with poor network coverage. However, its worth noting that these delays are generally minimal and may not be noticeable to most users.

FAQ:

Does Telegrams encryption impact battery life?While encryption does require additional computational resources, the impact on battery life is generally negligible. Modern smartphones are equipped to handle the encryption process efficiently, and any potential drain on battery life is minimal.

Can I disable encryption on Telegram?No, encryption is an integral part of Telegrams security measures and cannot be disabled. It ensures that your messages and data remain secure and private.

Is Telegrams encryption secure?Telegrams encryption protocols have been praised security experts for their robustness. However, its important to note that no encryption system is entirely foolproof, and vulnerabilities can emerge over time. Telegram regularly updates its encryption protocols to address any potential weaknesses and maintain a high level of security.

In conclusion, while Telegrams heavy encryption does have some impact on performance, such as increased data usage and slight delays in message transmission, the trade-off for enhanced privacy and security is well worth it for most users. As technology continues to advance, it is likely that any minor performance issues will be further mitigated, ensuring a seamless and secure messaging experience for Telegram users.

Original post:
What impact does Telegram's heavy encryption have on performance? - TickerTV News

What are the ethical considerations of WhatsApp’s encryption in … – TickerTV News

What are the ethical considerations of WhatsApps encryption in criminal investigations?

In recent years, the use of encrypted messaging apps has skyrocketed, with WhatsApp being one of the most popular choices worldwide. While encryption provides users with a sense of security and privacy, it has also raised concerns among law enforcement agencies and policymakers. The debate surrounding the ethical considerations of WhatsApps encryption in criminal investigations has become increasingly complex.

What is encryption?Encryption is the process of encoding information in a way that only authorized parties can access it. In the case of messaging apps like WhatsApp, end-to-end encryption ensures that only the sender and recipient can read the messages, preventing anyone else, including the app provider, from intercepting or deciphering the content.

The benefits of encryption:Encryption plays a crucial role in protecting individuals privacy and sensitive information. It safeguards personal conversations, financial transactions, and other confidential data from unauthorized access, hacking, and surveillance. It empowers users to communicate freely without fear of their conversations being intercepted or misused.

The challenges for law enforcement:While encryption provides significant benefits, it also poses challenges for law enforcement agencies. The inability to access encrypted messages hampers criminal investigations, making it difficult to gather evidence and prevent potential threats to public safety. This has led to a growing concern that encryption may be aiding criminals in hiding their activities and planning illegal acts.

The ethical considerations:The ethical considerations of WhatsApps encryption in criminal investigations revolve around the balance between privacy and security. On one hand, individuals have the right to privacy and the expectation that their conversations will remain confidential. On the other hand, society expects law enforcement agencies to protect public safety and prevent criminal activities.

FAQ:Q: Can WhatsApp decrypt messages for law enforcement?A: No, WhatsApps end-to-end encryption ensures that only the sender and recipient can access the messages. WhatsApp does not have the ability to decrypt or provide access to the content.

Q: Should encryption be weakened for law enforcement purposes?A: This is a highly debated topic. Weakening encryption for law enforcement purposes could potentially compromise the privacy and security of millions of users. It is essential to find a balance that respects both privacy and public safety.

Q: Are there alternative solutions?A: Some argue that alternative solutions, such as improved collaboration between tech companies and law enforcement agencies, could help address the challenges posed encryption. However, finding a solution that satisfies all parties involved remains a complex task.

In conclusion, the ethical considerations surrounding WhatsApps encryption in criminal investigations highlight the delicate balance between privacy and security. While encryption provides individuals with essential privacy protections, it also presents challenges for law enforcement agencies. Striking the right balance between these competing interests is crucial to ensure both privacy and public safety are upheld in the digital age.

Excerpt from:
What are the ethical considerations of WhatsApp's encryption in ... - TickerTV News

What are the implications of Telegram’s move towards encrypted … – TickerTV News

What are the implications of Telegrams move towards encrypted voice calls?

Telegram, the popular messaging app known for its strong focus on privacy and security, recently announced its plans to introduce end-to-end encrypted voice calls. This move has significant implications for both Telegram users and the broader landscape of secure communication platforms.

What is end-to-end encryption?End-to-end encryption is a security measure that ensures only the sender and recipient can access the content of a message. It prevents any intermediaries, including service providers or hackers, from intercepting or deciphering the communication.

Why is Telegrams move significant?Telegrams decision to implement end-to-end encryption for voice calls is significant because it enhances the overall privacy and security of its users. Voice calls have traditionally been more vulnerable to interception, making this move a crucial step towards protecting sensitive conversations.

What are the benefits for Telegram users?The introduction of encrypted voice calls on Telegram provides users with an additional layer of security. It means that conversations will be protected from unauthorized access, ensuring that private discussions remain private. This feature will be particularly valuable for individuals and organizations that handle sensitive information or have a need for secure communication.

What are the broader implications?Telegrams move towards encrypted voice calls sets a precedent for other messaging platforms to prioritize user privacy. As more users become aware of the importance of secure communication, the demand for encrypted services is likely to increase. This could lead to a shift in the industry, with other platforms following suit and implementing similar security measures.

ConclusionTelegrams decision to introduce end-to-end encrypted voice calls is a significant development in the realm of secure communication. By prioritizing user privacy, Telegram is setting a standard for other platforms to follow. This move not only benefits Telegram users providing them with enhanced security, but it also highlights the growing demand for encrypted services in todays digital landscape. As technology continues to evolve, it is crucial for communication platforms to adapt and prioritize the protection of user data.

See more here:
What are the implications of Telegram's move towards encrypted ... - TickerTV News

Zero hour for Zero Trust: How data tagging can speed implementation – C4ISRNET

Its zero hour for zero trust.

While the concept has been around for years, the clock is now ticking for the federal government to implement it. Championed as a solution for securely delivering mission-critical data at the speed of battle, a Biden administration memorandum requires federal agencies to achieve specific zero trust security goals by the end of Fiscal Year 2024. Further, the Department of Defense is working toward implementing its zero trust cybersecurity framework by FY 2027.

The good news? In the face of escalating cyber threats, data shows 72% of government agencies are already deploying zero trust security initiatives. Yet theres a remaining roadblock on the horizon that could pose dire national security implications: data tagging standardization.

Data lives in various formats, including structured, unstructured, and differing file types and classification levels. Currently, agencies take their own unique approaches to the data discovery process, building a pipeline to classify and determine tags the metadata tags assigned to data for organizational and access purposes. Many still rely on manual tagging which is cumbersome, while others are moving toward leveraging AI and ML software that allow for adaptive data tagging.

While there has been some movement toward a standard enterprise data header tagging method among members of the intelligence community, the complexity of differing data type collection paired with siloed processes continues to result in an inefficient and insecure mode of data sharing. Across agencies, sensitivity tags appear in different fields and formats, making them difficult to classify and creating challenges when enforcing policy between agencies. The fact that there is no consistent approach to tagging and classifying data especially sensitive data is a significant obstacle to zero trust models.

For example, this lack of standardization makes it challenging for the DOD to address data rights management around mission partner interactions with other Five Eyes nations. Establishing set marking methods around sensitivity tags at a minimum so agencies know where to look, and then how to proceed would reduce risk and advance data-centric decision making.

Data is the foundation of U.S. intelligence. Amid ever-increasing numbers of communication channels, devices, and open-source intelligence, the data deluge presents common opportunities and risks across the federal government. Among those risks is the notion that data is a valuable resource for nation-state threat actors who are seeking to steal or disrupt access to the data.

In the face of evolving cyber threats, the legacy, siloed approach to data tagging can be problematic. If the public sector had more consistent tagging of sensitive information, then automated encryption mechanisms could be deployed to reduce risk. The outcome would be a reliable and risk-based encryption approach that would target encryption for most sensitive data, not all data, in the enterprise.

Defense agencies must work together to develop a unified standard of data tagging that ensures data access to those that need it while protecting against those that dont. A data-centric security approach is critical to accelerate mission outcomes, and a whole-of-government approach to data tagging formats and meta-data standardization must be seen as an essential next step in the federal governments zero trust journey.

Suggestions for eliminating this roadblock and embracing a zero trust mindset include:

Learn from pilot programs. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and DOD are already pursuing improvements to data tagging like establishing clear marking requirements to make it easier to train AI/ML algorithms. We can benefit from those already investing in this work and apply those learnings to other agencies.

Implement working sessions. To ensure a unified approach, CISA and the DOD Chief Information Officer should help broker a conversation across all federal agencies, DOD components, and the Intelligence Community by working with each agency and components chief data officer. For zero trust to be effective, we must initiate all-government working sessions on this topic.

Prioritize what should be standardized. Its not about boiling the ocean, as agencies will continue to have mission-specific data so prioritizing a unified approach to headers and sensitivity tagging is a great place to start. The main concern should be focusing on format standardization with the ability to customize tags based on unique mission and agency requirements.

Leverage tech for good. AI/ML tools can help eliminate human error by catching misclassifications or suggesting a change to a sensitivity level or tag based on what AI has analyzed within the document. But these tools are only as powerful as the data tags they can decipher. Therefore, this all-government approach must also apply to standardizing how these tools read and act on data tagging. Once that is established, it is this technology that will accelerate progress toward the nations zero trust implementation goals.

Existing network, data, and communication standards such as TCP/IP, XML, 802.11, and ODNIs Trusted Data Format demonstrate there is a precedent for setting unified standards. By establishing such standards for data tagging, the federal government can take a significant step toward achieving its zero trust goals.

Now is the time to act.

Ryan Zacha is a Principal Solutions Architect and Michael Lundberg is a Vice President at Booz Allen Hamilton focusing on defensive cyber solutions and zero trust architecture.

Read more from the original source:
Zero hour for Zero Trust: How data tagging can speed implementation - C4ISRNET

The Future of Fully Homomorphic Encryption – IEEE Spectrum

This sponsored article is brought to you by NYU Tandon School of Engineering.

In our digital age, where information flows seamlessly through the vast network of the internet, the importance of encrypted data cannot be overstated. As we share, communicate, and store an increasing amount of sensitive information online, the need to safeguard it from prying eyes and malicious actors becomes paramount. Encryption serves as the digital guardian, placing our data in a lockbox of algorithms that only those with the proper key can unlock.

Whether its personal messages, health data, financial transactions, or confidential business communications, encryption plays a pivotal role in maintaining privacy and ensuring the integrity of our digital interactions. Typically, data encryption protects data in transit: its locked in an encrypted container for transit over potentially unsecured networks, then unlocked at the other end, by the other party for analysis. But outsourcing to a third-party is inherently insecure.

NYU Tandon School of Engineering

Brandon Reagen, Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering and Electrical and Computer Engineering at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering.

But what if encryption didnt just exist in transit and sit unprotected on either end of the transmission? What if it was possible to do all of your computer work from basic apps to complicated algorithms fully encrypted, from beginning to end.

That is the task being taken up by Brandon Reagen, Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering and Electrical and Computer Engineering at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering. Reagen, who is also a member of the NYU Center for Cybersecurity, focuses his research on designing specialized hardware accelerators for applications including privacy preserving computation. And now, he is proving that the future of computing can be privacy-forward while making huge advances in information processing and hardware design.

In a world where cyber threats are ever-evolving and data breaches are a constant concern, encrypted data acts as a shield against unauthorized access, identity theft, and other cybercrimes. It provides individuals, businesses, and organizations with a secure foundation upon which they can build trust and confidence in the digital realm.

The goal of cybersecurity researchers is the protection of your data from all sorts of bad actors cybercriminals, data-hungry companies, and authoritarian governments. And Reagen believes encrypted computing could hold an answer. This sort of encryption can give you three major things: improved security, complete confidentiality and sometimes control over how your data is used, says Reagen. Its a totally new level of privacy.

My aim is to develop ways to run expensive applications, for example, massive neural networks, cost-effectively and efficiently, anywhere, from massive servers to smartphones Brandon Reagen, NYU Tandon

Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), one type of privacy preserving computation, offers a solution to this challenge. FHE enables computation on encrypted data, or ciphertext, to keep data protected at all times. The benefits of FHE are significant, from enabling the use of untrusted networks to enhancing data privacy. FHE is an advanced cryptographic technique, widely considered the holy grail of encryption, that enables users to process encrypted data while the data or models remain encrypted, preserving data privacy throughout the data computation process, not just during transit.

While a number of FHE solutions have been developed, running FHE in software on standard processing hardware remains untenable for practical data security applications due to the massive processing overhead. Reagen and his colleagues have recently been working on a DARPA-funded project called The Data Protection in Virtual Environments (DPRIVE) program, that seeks to speed up FHE computation to more usable levels.

Specifically, the program seeks to develop novel approaches to data movement and management, parallel processing, custom functional units, compiler technology, and formal verification methods that ensure the design of the FHE implementation is effective and accurate, while also dramatically decreasing the performance penalty incurred by FHE computations. The target accelerator should reduce the computational run time overhead by many orders of magnitude compared to current software-based FHE computations on conventional CPUs, and accelerate FHE calculations to within one order of magnitude of current performance on unencrypted data.

While FHE has been shown to be possible, the hardware required for it to be practical is still rapidly being developed by researchers. Reagen and his team are designing it from the ground up, including new chips, datapaths, memory hierarchies, and software stacks to make it all work together.

The team was the first to show that the extreme levels of speedup needed to make HE feasible was possible. And by early next year, theyll begin manufacturing of their prototypes to further their field testing.

Reagen who earned a doctoral degree in computer science from Harvard in 2018 and undergraduate degrees in computer systems engineering and applied mathematics from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, in 2012 focused on creating specialized hardware accelerators for applications like deep learning. These accelerators enhance specialized hardware that can be made orders of magnitude more efficient than general-purpose platforms like CPUs. Enabling accelerators requires changes to the entire compute stack, and to bring about this change, he has made several contributions to lowering the barrier of using accelerators as general architectural constructs, including benchmarking, simulation infrastructure, and System on a Chip (SoC) design.

My aim is to develop ways to run expensive applications, for example, massive neural networks, cost-effectively and efficiently, anywhere, from massive servers to smartphones, he says.

Before coming to NYU Tandon, Reagen was a former research scientist on Facebooks AI Infrastructure Research team, where he became deeply involved in studying privacy. This combination of a deep cutting-edge computer hardware background and a commitment to digital security made him a perfect fit for NYU Tandon and the NYU Center for Cybersecurity, which has been at the forefront of cybersecurity research since its inception.

A lot of the big problems that we have in the world right now revolve around data. Consider global health coming off of COVID: if we had better ways of computing global health data analytics and sharing information without exposing private data, we might have been able to respond to the crisis more effectively and sooner Brandon Reagen, NYU Tandon

For Reagen, this is an exciting moment in the history of privacy preserving computation, a field that will have huge implications for the future of data and computing.

Im an optimist I think this could have as big an impact as the Internet itself, says Reagen. And the reason is that, if you think about a lot of the big problems that we have in the world right now, a lot of them revolve around data. Consider global health. Were just coming off of COVID, and if we had better ways of computing global health data analytics and sharing information without exposing private data, we might have been able to respond to the crisis more effectively and sooner. If we had better ways of sharing data about climate change data from all over the world, without exposing what each individual country or state or city was actually emitting, you could imagine better ways of managing and fighting global climate change. These problems are, in large part, problems of data, and this kind of software can help us solve them.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Read the original post:
The Future of Fully Homomorphic Encryption - IEEE Spectrum