Category Archives: Engineering
This speech pathologist taught herself to codenow she earns $93,000 as a software engineer – CNBC
Welcome toPaycheck to Paycheck, where workers with the same job across the U.S. share how much they earn, how they got to their salary and their best negotiating tips. Ready to join the salary transparency conversation?Apply to be a part of the series here.
In this installment, a 27-year-old shares how she makes $93,000 working as a software engineer in Austin.Read how her salary stacks up to other software engineers around the U.S.
At 27 years old, Sarah has already reached a salary milestone she didn't expect to hit for another few decades.
She currently works as a software engineer for a start-up in Austin, where she joined the company at a base salary of $80,000. It was her first job in tech after working as a speech pathologist for two years, and the pay was far above what she thought she'd be earning at her age.
"Had I continued as a speech pathologist, I would be lucky to make $80,000 a year after 20 years of working at one location," she tells CNBC Make It.
After the start-up closed a big deal at the end of 2020, Sarah was awarded a $13,000 pay raise, bringing her annual salary to $93,000 a year.
Here's how Sarah advocated for her pay in recent years, and why she believes it's important for her to share her earnings as a woman working in a male-dominated field.
Sarah, who asked to be identified by her first name only to speak freely about her pay, went to college and grad school to become a speech pathologist. After graduation, she had trouble finding steady work that paid her a full-time wage.
She made it work by taking two part-time jobs, one at a nursing facility that paid $26 an hour, and a weekend job at a hospital that paid $34 an hour. "It was hard work and long hours," she says. "At the end of the day, I didn't enjoy the work and needed a different path."
One day, Sarah confided in a female friend who works as a software engineer, who sat her down and explained what her day-to-day looked like. For the first time, Sarah could picture herself working in tech.
"I never saw myself as cut out to be a software engineer," Sarah says. "I don't know if that's because I'm a woman or some other reason. The second she gave me those details, I was like, 'I can totally see myself doing that. Why am I not already doing that?'"
Sarah looked into ways to transition into tech. She found free and low-cost online courses and taught herself to code after work. She added her skills to her LinkedIn page, and a recruiter with an Austin-based start-up invited her to apply for a six-month software engineering internship.
After Sarah completed the internship, she was hired on as a full-time employee. She now has almost two years of experience working as a software engineer.
Sarah didn't negotiate the rate of her paid internship she was shocked to be hired at all.
"At the time, I was just thrilled that someone was going to pay me," she says. The internship posting listed a pay range of $16 to $24 an hour, and the company offered Sarah $24 an hour right off the bat. "Maybe it was strategic on their part, but in my mind I felt I was already getting the upper range," she says.
When her internship ended, however, she came prepared to negotiate her full-time salary. The company offered her a base salary of $72,000 a year.
But based on her research using online salary databases, focusing in on her level of experience and the Austin market, Sarah thought she should be making more.
Around the same time, Sarah's younger brother was starting his first software engineering job and secured a role that paid $100,000 straight out of college. "It was a bigger company in a different market, so you can't directly compare the two," Sarah says. Still, "I felt like I deserved more than that $72,000. I mean, what does my brother have that I don't?"
Knowing that her pay could go much higher, Sarah brought the pay rates she found online to negotiate. HR raised her offer to $80,000, which she accepted.
"At $80,000 I was pleased but still ambitious to get more," Sarah says.
After a few months of hard work, her perseverance paid off. Her company closed a large deal at the end of 2020 and rewarded all employees with raises. Sarah's new salary now comes out to $93,000 a year. She also recently earned a $2,500 performance bonus.
"Now at around $95,000 with my bonus, I'm really proud to be making what I make," Sarah says.
Moving forward, Sarah knows to always negotiate for more, "even if you think you got the upper range of what's available. Someone else will always negotiate, most likely a man, so you shouldn't miss that opportunity."
Tech jobs are known for commanding high pay, thanks to an exploding need for people to build the products and services we rely on every day, and a shortage of workers with the right skillsets to keep pace. The average software engineer earned roughly $153,000 in 2020, according to a report from Hired, a marketplace for tech jobs.
But for such a fast-growing and socially impactful industry, tech is widely known for its lack of racial and gender diversity. Like many industries, white men are consistently paid more than peers who are Black, Hispanic and women making discussions of salary transparency and pay equity all the more important.
As a white woman, Sarah is fully aware of these gaps and tries to be as open about her pay as possible. "Transparency is key to be paid fairly," she says. "Had I not had access to data online, I probably would have accepted what I was offered when I deserved to be paid more."
She wants her own salary story to help other people new to tech, especially women and young girls thinking of entering the field.
"In the bigger picture, there aren't enough role models of women in tech being transparent about their work and what they make, which could help young girls aspire to do that," Sarah says. "A lot of girls think of tech as a field that they don't belong in I know I felt that way."
Check out:
From $70,000 to $120,000: Heres how much 3 software engineers earn around the U.S.
This 26-year-old doubled his pay by switching to computer scienceand using a key negotiating trick
15 of the top companies for women working in tech
Sign up now: Get smarter about your money and career with our weekly newsletter
Go here to see the original:
This speech pathologist taught herself to codenow she earns $93,000 as a software engineer - CNBC
Investors in Altair Engineering (NASDAQ:ALTR) have made a strong return of 138% over the past three years – Yahoo Finance
The worst result, after buying shares in a company (assuming no leverage), would be if you lose all the money you put in. But if you buy shares in a really great company, you can more than double your money. To wit, the Altair Engineering Inc. (NASDAQ:ALTR) share price has flown 138% in the last three years. Most would be happy with that. It's down 1.4% in the last seven days.
With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.
View our latest analysis for Altair Engineering
Altair Engineering isn't currently profitable, so most analysts would look to revenue growth to get an idea of how fast the underlying business is growing. Shareholders of unprofitable companies usually expect strong revenue growth. As you can imagine, fast revenue growth, when maintained, often leads to fast profit growth.
In the last 3 years Altair Engineering saw its revenue grow at 9.2% per year. That's a very respectable growth rate. It's fair to say that the market has acknowledged the growth by pushing the share price up 33% per year. The business has made good progress on the top line, but the market is extrapolating the growth. It would be worth thinking about when profits will flow, since that milestone will attract more attention.
The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).
earnings-and-revenue-growth
We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Altair Engineering will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).
It's nice to see that Altair Engineering shareholders have gained 61% (in total) over the last year. That's better than the annualized TSR of 33% over the last three years. The improving returns to shareholders suggests the stock is becoming more popular with time. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Altair Engineering better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Altair Engineering you should be aware of.
Story continues
For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on US exchanges.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
See the article here:
Project of the Year Finalist, Best Landscape/Urban Development: Little Island – Engineering News-Record
]]>
Little Island New York CityPROJECT OF THE YEAR FINALIST and BEST PROJECTOWNER: Little IslandLEAD DESIGN FIRM: Heatherwick StudioGENERAL CONTRACTOR: Hunter Roberts Construction GroupCIVIL, STRUCTURAL AND MEP ENGINEER: ArupLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Mathews Nielsen Landscape Architects P.C.PRECAST CONTRACTOR: Fort Miller GroupMARINE CONTRACTORS: Weeks Marine and Trevcon ConstructionMARINE ENGINEER: Mueser Rutledge Consulting EngineersLIGHTING DESIGNER: Fisher Marantz Stone
Theres plenty of function to go with the unique form of this park situated on top of the Hudson River. Green urban space in Manhattan is such an incredibly precious thing that when you have the opportunity to build new park space, it should behave like a Swiss Army knife, says Mat Cash, partner and group leader at Heatherwick Studios, lead design firm for Little Island, which resembles a giant field of cement tulips growing out of the river.
Photo by Michael Grimm
The 2.4-acre public park, funded by the Diller-von Furstenberg Family Foundation, boasts trees, plants and other greenery growing out of flower-shaped pots. There also are walking paths, rolling hills, open lawns, a 700-seat amphitheater, an open plaza, a flat pier beneath the pots and other amenities. The park arrived at its May 2021 opening thanks to a feat of team coordination, innovations in design technology and use of the river itself as a crucial mode of transport. One Best Projects judge noted: The West Side was in need of more public space, and this is a wonderful addition.
Photo by Michael Grimm
The obvious challenge was how to fabricate, assemble and erect the pots with complex geometry onto the precast piles driven into the river, engineer Arup said in its submission. Heatherwick used its London workshops to mock up and test elements like slope angles and jointing widths between each structural pot. Cash says using a Cairo pentagon design helped simplify the geometry.
Photo by Michael Grimm
The architect developed the geometry in scripts, which were given to the engineer to create structural precast elements and connecting steel elements using 3D models. Digital models were sent to the fabricator for computer numerical control, milling of foamworks, rebar bending and laser cutting of steel connection plates.
Photo by Michael Grimm
Concrete precaster Fort Miller Group established an in-house company for the advanced, large scale foam milling used to form the pots. Apparently, they were told that the concept was crazy and not fit for a precast, president Scott D. Harrigan previously told ENR. Arup principal David Farnsworth says foam models were folded into correct shapes basically like origami, then cast into concrete. The submission says assembled pots were moved to the site via river barge and erected onto each pile using a large barge crane. Piles were driven with a fixed lead system with GPS equipment on leads and using traditional survey methods.
Photo by Michael Grimm
While the 132 pots dominate the park, each of its trees was carefully selected, with the team developing and periodically testing custom planting soil blends. The construction schedule was coordinated around planting seasons to insure the flora thrived. The team worked to achieve ADA compliance on pathways set on extensive geography. Site railings made of red brass with a pre-patina finish were fabricated to align with the curvilinear pathways. All wooden elements, such as black locust stair treads, were harvested and dried to a certain moisture content to minimize warping.
Photo by Michael Grimm
Cash praises the team collaboration, as did the family foundation. It was extraordinary to work with the exceptional design and engineering teams that made this unique park vision a reality, the organization said in a statement to ENR. In endeavoring to pursue outcomes never before achieved, we pushed the boundaries of what is possible for all of us.
Photo by Michael Grimm
Photo by Michael Grimm
See the original post:
Purdue University Northwest engineering student part of team that won national packaging competition Northwest Indiana Business Magazine – Northwest…
Efforts by Purdue University Northwest student Andrew Smith has shined a national spotlight on the Region.
Smith, a mechatronics engineering technology student at PNW, was part of a three-student team that won the 2021 Amazing Packaging Race at the annual Pack Expo trade show in Las Vegas, presented by the Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute. Smith, a fourth-year student at PNW, along with teammates Anna Troutt of Virginia Tech and Serena Pu of California Polytechnic State University, completed a series of challenges across four exhibit halls, which landed them a $3,000 prize.
My teammates and I were really excited when our team was announced as the winners, said Smith of Griffith who led the team. The way we scored points throughout the race was by posting every single task we completed to Twitter. We would take a picture with the company and post it along with a thank you message which scored us extra points.
The competition required competing teams to search the exhibit halls to find the 10 booths with specific tasks to be completed by each team. Tasks included completing math problems related to packaging, executing functionality of a companys machine or learning about a companys machines and services and then answering related questions.
We try to close the gap between education and the working environment, said Maged Mikhail, associate professor of mechatronics engineering technology at PNW. Connecting our students to industry by having them attend the Pack Expo and participate in the competition shows them they are capable of solving manufacturing and packaging problems.
The mechatronics engineering technology program at PNW is a hybrid degree program that combines mechanical and electrical engineering technology with computer science.
PNWs collaboration with the Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute allows students to take part in industry-led conferences, seminars and trainings, including paying the students expenses to attend the Pack Expo and participate in the competition. The Pack Expo is an annual trade show that connects consumer goods companies with manufacturing solutions in packaging and processing, this year drawing 1,500 exhibitors and 23,000 attendees.
Larry is an award-winning journalist with more than 25 years of experience working with daily newspapers and business-to-business publications around the Midwest. Avila is a Michigan native and a graduate of Central Michigan University.
See original here:
BRANDON WEBSTER joins Method Engineering Group | Construction & Building | savannahbusinessjournal.com – Savannah Business Journal
November 15, 2021 - Method Engineering Group recently announced that Brandon Webster has joined its team of engineering professionals.
Webster, a registered professional engineer, joins Method Engineering Group as a project manager. He has a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. In this position, Webster will join his previous co-workers and current firm principals Christopher Shaffer and Andrew McKeever to assist in the design and project management of multiple projects throughout the Southeast.
This position is a great opportunity to expand on the engineering and project management skills I have acquired over the past 7 years, Webster said. Method Engineering Group is a growing company in the Savannah area with a unique work environment that strives for client satisfaction. I look forward to being part of the growing team and I am excited for the new opportunity.
Brandon is married to Ashley, who is a Registered Nurse and studying to become a Nurse Practitioner. In his spare time, Brandon can be found working at his family Christmas tree farm in Darien, Georgia. Brandon is also a licensed private pilot and enjoys golfing and traveling.
Webster is a currently licensed in Georgia and South Carolina. He has extensive experience in K-12 education, higher education, multifamily, and hospitality building design. He has a strong understanding of HVAC, plumbing, and fire protection design principles for commercial buildings.
Brandon is a great addition to the Method Engineering team, said firm principal Andrew McKeever. We are familiar with his strong work ethic and his knowledge of mechanical engineering systems. He will help us deliver thoughtful engineering designs for our architecture and building-owner clients.
Were excited to welcome Brandon to our team, said firm principal Chris Shaffer. We know his talents will help us grow our reputation to provide exceptional engineering while using the latest design software.
Method Engineering Group is a consulting engineering firm focused on providing MEP engineering solutions for architects and building owners. Founded in Savannah, Georgia in 2019, Method Engineering Group specializes in the design of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems for new and renovated buildings. Additional services include fire protection design, communication system design, and sustainability consulting. Method Engineering Group offers engineering design services in 7 states, including Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida. For more information or to contact Method Engineering Group, call 912-963-1611, or visit http://www.methodeg.com.
More:
Noninvasive brain biopsy shows improved sensitivity in tumor detection – The Source – Washington University in St. Louis Newsroom
Glioblastomas are aggressive brain tumors that are commonly diagnosed through a risky and invasive surgical biopsy. A team of researchers led by Hong Chen at Washington University in St. Louis has developed a noninvasive diagnostic method that may one day replace the tissue biopsy with a simple blood test.
Chen, associate professor of biomedical engineering at the McKelvey School of Engineering and of radiation oncology in the School of Medicine; Eric Leuthardt, MD, professor of neurosurgery at the School of Medicine and of biomedical engineering at McKelvey Engineering; and the team tested the method in both small and large animal models and found significantly improved detection and diagnostic sensitivity for brain tumors via a simple blood sample. Results of the study are published online in the journalTheranostics,Nov. 10.
The method, known as sonobiopsy,uses focused ultrasound to target tumors deep in the brain. Once located, the researchers inject microbubbles into the blood that travel to the ultrasound-targeted tissue and pulsate, which safely opens the blood-brain barrier. The temporary openings allow biomarkers, such as DNA, RNA and proteins, from the tumor to pass through the blood-brain barrier and release into the blood.
Chen, Leuthardt and the team have been working on their focused ultrasound-enabled liquid biopsy (sonobiopsy) method for several years, first conducting a feasibility study in mice, followed by a safety evaluation study, and most recently, another study in pigs. While blood-based liquid biopsy has been used in human patients with other cancers for personalized medicine, progress in extending the method to human brain cancer has been limited.
In the new research, the team, including Christopher Pacia, first author and a biomedical engineering doctoral student in the Chen ultrasound lab, found that the sonobiopsy method boosted detection of genes highly expressed in the mouse model of glioblastoma, EGFRvIII. The DNA levels of EGFRvIII circulating in the bloodstream of the group that underwent sonobiopsy was 920 times greater than the group that underwent conventional blood-based liquid biopsy. Further, detection of another circulating tumor genetic marker, TERT C228T ctDNA, was 10-fold higher after sonobiopsy. In addition, the method improved diagnostic sensitivity from 7.14% to 64.71% for EGFRvIII and from 14.29% to 45.83% for TERT C228T. The team found no increase in tissue damage in the tumor region of interest after the sonobiopsy.
In the pig model, sonobiopsy boosted detection of EGFRvIII ctDNA by 270-fold and increased levels of TERT ctDNA nine-fold. It improved diagnostic sensitivity from 28.57% to 100% for EGFRvIII and from 42.86% to 71.43% for TERT C228T. No significant tissue damage was found.
Our study showed that sonobiopsy enriched tumor-specific ctDNA in the plasma and improved the detection sensitivity for two glioblastoma phenotypes without posing significant safety risks, Chen said. The integration of sonobiopsy with advanced blood analysis assays has the promise to provide minimally invasive, spatiotemporal-controlled and sensitive diagnosis of brain cancer.
This work is a collaborative effort involving members from both engineering and medical schools, including Leuthardt, chief of the Division of Neurotechnology and of theCenter for Innovation in Neuroscience and Technology and professor of neurosurgery and of neuroscience at the School of Medicine, as well as of biomedical engineering and of mechanical engineering and applied science at the McKelvey School of Engineering.
Besides neuroimaging and surgically-acquired tissue for pathology and molecular profiling, sonobiopsy has the potential to become the third pillar for brain tumor management by substantially advancing brain cancer diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and recurrence detection, Leuthardt said.
This enhanced capability could have an important impact throughout the continuum of patient care.
Funding for this research was provided by the National Institutes of Health (R01EB027223, R01EB030102, and R01MH116981). C.P.P was supported by the NIH T32NS115672.
The McKelvey School of Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis promotes independent inquiry and education with an emphasis on scientific excellence, innovation and collaboration without boundaries. McKelvey Engineering has top-ranked research and graduate programs across departments, particularly in biomedical engineering, environmental engineering and computing, and has one of the most selective undergraduate programs in the country. With 140 full-time faculty, 1,387 undergraduate students, 1,448 graduate students and 21,000 living alumni, we are working to solve some of societys greatest challenges; to prepare students to become leaders and innovate throughout their careers; and to be a catalyst of economic development for the St. Louis region and beyond.
Go here to read the rest:
Sadbhav Engineering reports consolidated net loss of Rs 64.49 crore in the September 2021 quarter – Business Standard
Sales decline 37.76% to Rs 336.53 crore
Powered by Capital Market - Live News
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor
First Published: Mon, November 15 2021. 15:53 IST
See the rest here:
Trailblazing Women Who Broke into Engineering in the 1970s Reflect on What’s Changed and What Hasn’t – Nextgov
Engineering in the U.S. has long been and continues to be a male-dominated profession. Fifty years ago, it looked like that might change.
In 1970, the percentage of women majoring in engineering was less than 1%. In 1979, that number was 9%. Many hoped women would continue to enter the field at the same rate. But thats not what happened. Today, only 21% of engineering majors are women, a number largely unchanged since 2000.
I am a historian who, along with my colleagues, Nicole Conroy and William Barr II, surveyed 251 women engineers who graduated from college in the 1970s. These trailblazing women reflected on the adversity they faced and had advice for women entering the field today.
Never quite one of the group
We asked about the greatest challenges our survey takers faced as women in a male-dominated field. The three obstacles they cited most frequently were not getting respect, not fitting in and struggling to achieve work/family balance.
One survey taker, a biomechanical engineer who now works in web engineering, explained, The greatest challenge for me was continuing to believe in myself, when all the messages I was getting were that I would never be taken seriously or promoted or given raises or even hired at the same rate as men, who were clearly less qualified and not as smart as I was.
A chemical engineer who worked in manufacturing concurred, You have to prove yourself just because you are female. And you have to work twice as hard!
A civil engineer said, We are women engineers. People dont refer to a man as a man engineer hes an engineer. We are constantly reminded that we dont truly belong. Another civil engineer stated, On many levels, youre never quite one of the group.
Women also talked about family caregiving responsibilities. A retired vice president from a major chemical company stated, Young women engineers are on equal footing until they have children, then they struggle to balance work and family and compete with men who dont have the same time constraints or busy family life. Another woman who worked as a chemist warned that bosses assume you will leave as soon as you start having babies.
Remember, the women we surveyed are all now in their 60s and 70s. We asked them if they thought the challenges they faced had changed over time. A retired chemical and environmental engineer said, Progress is slow a view echoed by many survey takers. A nuclear engineer added, There still remains an old boys club It isnt as blatant or as crass as when I started, but it still exists.
Some noted that subtle forms of discrimination and bias can be really damaging. An engineer with a long career in the auto industry said, Bias can be quite subtle, which really hurts young women, because it can take them years to recognize it, by which time they may have lost a lot of ground.
About one-quarter of survey respondents said that gender problems no longer exist. A senior project engineer said, Today, young women engineers are more accepted mostly because there are just more of them. Its easier to get their foot in the door. Younger male engineers are also used to working with women because they went to school with them.
Advice to young women entering engineering
Despite identifying challenges, the majority of survey takers said they would tell a young woman thinking about pursuing a career in engineering to Go for it!
Many of the women extolled the benefits of their chosen career. A program manager in manufacturing stated that hands down engineering is the best degree. A mechanical engineer who owned her own consulting company said, It will give you the flexibility to do almost anything. It is almost impossible to point out anything tangible an engineer didnt touch or influence in some way. It is also satisfying to see the effects of what you have done.
Some survey takers suggested younger women might need to ignore obstacles. A retired aerospace engineer advised, You can do the job. However it takes strength and perseverance to do so while ignoring the naysayers.
Respondents also had practical advice for younger women starting off in the profession. They emphasized using some approaches that worked for them. These included speaking up for yourself, exiting unsupportive workplaces, seeking professional organizations that can help you, finding mentors of all genders and reaching out to other women engineers.
A retired nuclear engineer said, Use the Old Girls Network it does exist Dont isolate yourself. You are not the only one with your issue.
Part of a larger struggle
Indeed, the problems our survey takers faced were and are structural.
Engineering remains male-dominated due to many factors common in other STEM fields. They include gender bias and stereotypes, male-dominated educational settings and workplaces, and sexual harassment.
The challenges for women from underrepresented groups, such as people of color, people with disabilities and people with LGBTQ identities, are even greater.
As a chemical engineering professor put it, Laws and attitudes have changed significantly However, these changes are not without backlash or pushback. Learning to cope with this is ongoing, not only for women, but for all strangers in this profession.
Laura Ettinger is an associate professor of history at Clarkson University.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The rest is here:
Electoral Engineering and the Freedom to Vote – Scientific American
Opinion
Securing basic voting rights should take priority over more elaborate reforms
Securing basic voting rights should take priority over more elaborate reforms
Michael Latner is a professor of political science at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, and a senior fellow of voting rights at the Union of Concerned Scientists' Center for Science and Democracy. He is co-author of Gerrymandering the States: Partisanship, Race, and the Transformation of American Federalism (Cambridge University Press, 2021) and Gerrymandering in America: The House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Popular Sovereignty (Cambridge University Press, 2016).
Charles "Tony" Smith is a professor of political science and law at the University of California, Irvine. His research is grounded in the American judiciary but includes comparative and international frameworks; its unifying theme is how democratic institutions and the strategic interaction of political actors fulfill or inhibit rights. He received a Ph.D. in political science from the University of California, San Diego, and a J.D. from the University of Florida.
Alex Keena is an assistant professor of political science at Virginia Commonwealth University whose research focuses on political representation. He is co-author of Gerrymandering the States: Partisanship, Race, and the Transformation of American Federalism (Cambridge University Press, 2021) and Gerrymandering in America: The House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Popular Sovereignty (Cambridge University Press, 2016). He received a Ph.D. in political science from the University of California, Irvine.
Anthony McGann is a professor of government and public policy at the University of Strathclyde in Scotland. He is co-author of Gerrymandering the States: Partisanship, Race, and the Transformation of American Federalism (Cambridge University Press, 2021), Gerrymandering in America: The House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Popular Sovereignty (Cambridge University Press, 2016) and The Logic of Democracy (University of Michigan Press, 2006).
Discover world-changing science. Explore our digital archive back to 1845, including articles by more than 150 Nobel Prize winners.
More here:
Electoral Engineering and the Freedom to Vote - Scientific American
Geophysical/Climate Application Computer Aided Engineering 2021: Market Size and Growth Forecasts and Position for Each of the Top 5 Vendors -…
DUBLIN, October 22, 2021--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "Geophysical/Climate Application - Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) 2021 Market Report: Market Size and Growth; 4-Year Forecast; Market Size, Growth and Position for Each of the Top 5 Vendors" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
The CAE Observatory was built in conjunction with industry specialists to help plan and develop the dataset, as well as contribute research and validation. The data is based upon multiple sources and viewpoints of the market, the most important being primary research of vendors. The model feeds additional information and industry knowledge from other stakeholders and Market Observatories.
Data in this Computer Aided Engineering Market report is provided in Software Revenue and Total Revenue terms. Software Revenue includes CAE-related software licences, maintenance, and subscription revenues. Total Revenue includes CAE-related provider services in addition to CAE-related software revenue.
Data is provided in U.S. Dollars (USD) and relate to Provider Revenues. Reseller margin and sales tax are excluded. All data is for the Worldwide market in 2021, unless otherwise stated. The data used in this snapshot is from the 2021 CAE Observatory. Forecasts and other data in this workbook are based on economic data from various sources published during early 2021
The CAE software industry is constantly evolving. Due to mergers, acquisitions and ongoing research, the list of included providers and products will change over time. This is a continual process.
Scope covering the CAE Market
2D and 3D physics based, simulation/analysis software, and related services using discretisation methods (e.g., Finite Element, Finite Volume, Finite Difference, Discrete Element, Meshless Methods).
Model Based Systems Engineering. From an overall system perspective, numerical models of components and systems behaviour (e.g. Modelica, AmeSim) are excluded. This might include 0d & 1D controls; physics simulation/analysis software and related services.
Key Topics Covered:
Story continues
CAE Market Observatory
Sources
Definition of the Geophysical/Climate Application
Market Size
Size & Growth of the Geophysical/Climate Application
Position of "Geophysical/Climate" Application within CAE Market
For each of the Top 5 vendors:
Companies Mentioned
For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/e9d7kt
About ResearchAndMarkets.com
ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211022005227/en/
Contacts
ResearchAndMarkets.comLaura Wood, Senior Press Managerpress@researchandmarkets.com For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900
Read more here: