Category Archives: Internet Security
Comcast announces it is extending service to Lititz, Ephrata, and Akron areas of Lancaster County – FOX43.com
The expansion will "(give) residents and businesses a new choice for video, internet, mobile, voice, and home security and automation services," the company said.
LANCASTER COUNTY, Pa. Comcast announced Wednesday that it has completed the majority of the construction necessary to expand its network to the Lancaster County boroughs of Ephrata, Lititz, and Akron and the townships of Ephrata, West Earl, and Warwick.
The expansion will "(give) residents and businesses a new choice for video, internet, mobile, voice, and home security and automation services," the company said in a press release.
The construction project to expand the network to northern Lancaster County will be fully completed this year, Comcast said. Residents and businesses in the area should expect to receive direct mail providing service information about a month before service can be activated at their address, the company added.
Lititz welcomes Comcast to our community," said mayor Timothy R. Snyder in the press release. "The services that Comcast provides will give our residents and businesses additional choices for how to best meet their communications needs."
Among the growing number of businesses in this area now using Comcast Business services is Listrak, a Lititz-based leading digital marketing cloud technology provider for more than 1,000 retailers and brands, Comcast said.
As eCommerce and technology continue to reshape the retail industry, Listrak has also grown exponentially, said David Lechlitner, Director of Information Technology at Listrak. We were looking for a vendor that offered the reliability and scalability to meet that demand. The benefit of added bandwidth, network reliability, and outstanding, responsive customer service we get from Comcast Business are critical to both our success and the success of our clients.
In addition to Gigabit internet service, the unique home WiFi control and security capabilities of xFi Advanced Security, Peacock streaming services included for most customers and the easy access to subscription streaming services for internet-only customers provided by Flex, residents in these areas also have access to the award-winning Xfinity X1 platform, Xfinity Home, Xfinity Voice and Xfinity Mobile, Comcast said.
Businesses in these areas can get the full suite of Comcast Business products and services, including Ethernet network speeds up to 100 Gigabits-per-second, the company added.
We are thrilled by the overwhelmingly positive response to our Xfinity and Comcast Business products and services from residents and business owners in our new service footprint in northern Lancaster County, said Michael Parker, Senior Vice President of Comcasts Keystone Region. We are pleased to be part of these communities and look forward to completing the expansion of our services to all residents in the coming months.
See original here:
Comcast announces it is extending service to Lititz, Ephrata, and Akron areas of Lancaster County - FOX43.com
Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Executive Summary And Analysis By Top Players 2021-2027|Cisco, IBM, Infineon – Farming Sector
Los Angeles United States:The global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market is researched with great precision and in a comprehensive manner to help you identify hidden opportunities and become informed about unpredictable challenges in the industry. The authors of the report have brought to light crucial growth factors, restraints, and trends of the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market. The research study offers complete analysis of critical aspects of the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market, including competition, segmentation, geographical progress, manufacturing cost analysis, and price structure. We have provided CAGR, value, volume, sales, production, revenue, and other estimations for the global as well as regional markets. Companies are profiled keeping in view their gross margin, market share, production, areas served, recent developments, and more factors.
Some of the Major Players Operating in This Report are: , Cisco, IBM, Infineon, Intel, Gemalto, Allot, Symantec Corporation, HP Enterprise Company, AT&T Inc, Trend micro Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology
The segmental analysis includes deep evaluation of each and every segment of the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market studied in the report. All of the segments of the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market are analyzed on the basis of market share, revenue, market size, production, and future prospects. The regional study of the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market explains how different regions and country-level markets are making developments. Furthermore, it gives a statistical representation of their progress during the course of the forecast period. Our analysts have used advanced primary and secondary research methodologies to compile the research study on the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market.
Get a Sample Copy of this Report at:
Segmentation by Product: , Network, Endpoint,
Segmentation by Application:, Smart Manufacturing, Connected Logistics, Smart Home and Consumer Electronics, Connected Healthcare, Smart Transportation, Smart Retail, Others
Report Objectives
With a view to estimate and verify the size of the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market and various other calculations, our researchers took bottom-up and top-down approaches. They used secondary research to identify key players of the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market. In order to collect key insights about the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market, they interviewed marketing executives, directors, VPs, CEOs, and industry experts.They also gathered information and data from quarterly and annual financial reports of companies. The final qualitative and quantitative data was obtained after analyzing and verifying every parameter affecting the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market and its segments. We used primary sources to verify all breakdowns, splits, and percentage shares after determining them with the help of secondary sources.
Our analysts arrived at accurate statistics of various segments and sub-segments of the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market and completed the overall market engineering process with market breakdown and data triangulation procedures. We looked at trends from both the supply and demand sides of the global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology market to triangulate the data.
Enquire for Customization In The Report @:
Table of Contents
1 Report Overview1.1 Study Scope1.2 Key Market Segments1.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Revenue1.4 Market Analysis by Type1.4.1 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size Growth Rate by Type: 2020 VS 20261.4.2 Network1.4.3 Endpoint1.4.4 Application1.4.5 Cloud1.4.6 Others1.5 Market by Application1.5.1 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Share by Application: 2020 VS 20261.5.2 Smart Manufacturing1.5.3 Connected Logistics1.5.4 Smart Home and Consumer Electronics1.5.5 Connected Healthcare1.5.6 Smart Transportation1.5.7 Smart Retail1.5.8 Others1.6 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Industry Impact1.6.1 How the Covid-19 is Affecting the Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Industry
1.6.1.1 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business Impact Assessment Covid-19
1.6.1.2 Supply Chain Challenges
1.6.1.3 COVID-19s Impact On Crude Oil and Refined Products1.6.2 Market Trends and Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Potential Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape1.6.3 Measures / Proposal against Covid-19
1.6.3.1 Government Measures to Combat Covid-19 Impact
1.6.3.2 Proposal for Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Players to Combat Covid-19 Impact1.7 Study Objectives1.8 Years Considered 2 Global Growth Trends by Regions2.1 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Perspective (2015-2026)2.2 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Growth Trends by Regions2.2.1 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Regions: 2015 VS 2020 VS 20262.2.2 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Historic Market Share by Regions (2015-2020)2.2.3 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Forecasted Market Size by Regions (2021-2026)2.3 Industry Trends and Growth Strategy2.3.1 Market Top Trends2.3.2 Market Drivers2.3.3 Market Challenges2.3.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis2.3.5 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Growth Strategy2.3.6 Primary Interviews with Key Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Players (Opinion Leaders) 3 Competition Landscape by Key Players3.1 Global Top Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Players by Market Size3.1.1 Global Top Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Players by Revenue (2015-2020)3.1.2 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Revenue Market Share by Players (2015-2020)3.1.3 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)3.2 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Concentration Ratio3.2.1 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)3.2.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Revenue in 20193.3 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Key Players Head office and Area Served3.4 Key Players Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Product Solution and Service3.5 Date of Enter into Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market3.6 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 4 Breakdown Data by Type (2015-2026)4.1 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Historic Market Size by Type (2015-2020)4.2 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Forecasted Market Size by Type (2021-2026) 5 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Breakdown Data by Application (2015-2026)5.1 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Application (2015-2020)5.2 Global Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Forecasted Market Size by Application (2021-2026) 6 North America6.1 North America Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size (2015-2020)6.2 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Key Players in North America (2019-2020)6.3 North America Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Type (2015-2020)6.4 North America Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 7 Europe7.1 Europe Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size (2015-2020)7.2 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Key Players in Europe (2019-2020)7.3 Europe Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Type (2015-2020)7.4 Europe Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 8 China8.1 China Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size (2015-2020)8.2 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Key Players in China (2019-2020)8.3 China Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Type (2015-2020)8.4 China Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 9 Japan9.1 Japan Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size (2015-2020)9.2 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Key Players in Japan (2019-2020)9.3 Japan Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Type (2015-2020)9.4 Japan Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 10 Southeast Asia10.1 Southeast Asia Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size (2015-2020)10.2 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Key Players in Southeast Asia (2019-2020)10.3 Southeast Asia Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Type (2015-2020)10.4 Southeast Asia Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 11 India11.1 India Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size (2015-2020)11.2 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Key Players in India (2019-2020)11.3 India Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Type (2015-2020)11.4 India Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 12 Central & South America12.1 Central & South America Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size (2015-2020)12.2 Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Key Players in Central & South America (2019-2020)12.3 Central & South America Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Type (2015-2020)12.4 Central & South America Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 13 Key Players Profiles13.1 Cisco13.1.1 Cisco Company Details13.1.2 Cisco Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.1.3 Cisco Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.1.4 Cisco Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020))13.1.5 Cisco Recent Development13.2 IBM13.2.1 IBM Company Details13.2.2 IBM Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.2.3 IBM Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.2.4 IBM Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020)13.2.5 IBM Recent Development13.3 Infineon13.3.1 Infineon Company Details13.3.2 Infineon Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.3.3 Infineon Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.3.4 Infineon Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020)13.3.5 Infineon Recent Development13.4 Intel13.4.1 Intel Company Details13.4.2 Intel Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.4.3 Intel Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.4.4 Intel Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020)13.4.5 Intel Recent Development13.5 Gemalto13.5.1 Gemalto Company Details13.5.2 Gemalto Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.5.3 Gemalto Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.5.4 Gemalto Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020)13.5.5 Gemalto Recent Development13.6 Allot13.6.1 Allot Company Details13.6.2 Allot Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.6.3 Allot Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.6.4 Allot Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020)13.6.5 Allot Recent Development13.7 Symantec Corporation13.7.1 Symantec Corporation Company Details13.7.2 Symantec Corporation Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.7.3 Symantec Corporation Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.7.4 Symantec Corporation Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020)13.7.5 Symantec Corporation Recent Development13.8 HP Enterprise Company13.8.1 HP Enterprise Company Company Details13.8.2 HP Enterprise Company Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.8.3 HP Enterprise Company Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.8.4 HP Enterprise Company Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020)13.8.5 HP Enterprise Company Recent Development13.9 AT&T Inc13.9.1 AT&T Inc Company Details13.9.2 AT&T Inc Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.9.3 AT&T Inc Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.9.4 AT&T Inc Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020)13.9.5 AT&T Inc Recent Development13.10 Trend micro13.10.1 Trend micro Company Details13.10.2 Trend micro Business Overview and Its Total Revenue13.10.3 Trend micro Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Introduction13.10.4 Trend micro Revenue in Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Business (2015-2020)13.10.5 Trend micro Recent Development 14 Analysts Viewpoints/Conclusions 15 Appendix15.1 Research Methodology15.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach15.1.2 Data Source15.2 Disclaimer15.3 Author Details
About US
QY Research is a leading global market research and consulting company. Established in 2007 in Beijing, China, QY Research focuses on management consulting, database and seminar services, IPO consulting, industry chain research and custom research to help our clients in providing non-linear revenue model and make them successful. We are globally recognized for our expansive portfolio of services.
Read more from the original source:
Internet of Things (IoT) Security Technology Market Executive Summary And Analysis By Top Players 2021-2027|Cisco, IBM, Infineon - Farming Sector
Economic Impact: India lost $2.8 bn in 2020 to Internet shutdowns; over double of 20 others – The Indian Express
India suffered the biggest economic impact in the world in 2020 due to Internet shutdowns, adding up to 8,927 hours and $2.8 billion losses. Of the 21 countries that curbed Web access last year, as per a report by the UK-based privacy and security research firm Top10VPN, the economic impact seen in India was more than double the combined cost for the next 20 countries in the list.
The report added that the actual economic impact for India may be even higher than the $2.8 billion figure which itself was double the losses on account of Internet shutdowns in 2019, with businesses in 2020 anyway hit due to the Covid lockdown. As in previous years, India continued to restrict Internet access more than any other country over 75 times in 2020. The majority of these short blackouts were highly targeted, affecting groups of villages or individual city districts, and so were not included in this report, which focuses on larger region-wide shutdowns, it said.
The report made a separate mention of the extended curbs on Internet use in Kashmir, with suspension of services lasting from August 2019 when J&Ks special status was scrapped to March 2020, and still remaining severely throttled, with only 2G access available. Calling it the longest Internet shutdown in a democracy, the report says, The restrictions have negatively impacted the distribution of medicine, businesses and schools. According to the latest Telecom Regulatory Authority of India data, as of October 31, there were 11.70 million wireless subscribers in the J&K circle.
While the economic impact due to Internet curbs surged in India in 2020, globally, at $4.01 billion, this came down by 50 per cent from 2019.
As per the report, the world saw 93 major shutdowns during the pandemic-stricken year. Apart from India, the report features Belarus, Myanmar, Yemen, Ethiopia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Syria, Iran, Tanzania, Venezuela and Somalia. Countries such as China and North Korea, which are known to restrict access to the Internet, are not in the list prepared by Top10VPN.
To calculate the economic cost of Internet shutdowns, the firm used the Cost of Shutdown Tool from Netblocks and Internet Society, which uses the Brookings Institution Method. Regional shutdown costs were calculated by determining the regions economic output as a proportion of its national gross domestic product.
The report defines an Internet shutdown as an intentional disruption of Internet or electronic communications, rendering them inaccessible or effectively unusable, for a specific population or within a location, often to exert control over the flow of information.
An e-mail query sent to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology had not elicited a response at the time of going to press.
While restrictions in J&K accounted for the highest share of Internet blackouts in the country, localised shutdowns were seen in regions in Arunachal Pradesh, including Lower Subansiri, Upper Subansiri, Lower Dibang Valley, Lohit, Tirap, Changlang, Itanagar Capital Region, Papum Pare, Tawang, East Kameng, West Kameng, East Siang, West Siang, Leparada and Upper Siang, in November, and in several regions of Meghalaya in February.
Dependence on the Internet has increased and, therefore, when a shutdown happens, access to a number of essential services is restricted There was a six-day-long ban in Hooghly near Kolkata in May, and this was when the pandemic was at its peak. People lost employment, lawyers could not attend hearings, people who depended on online pharma stores could not order medicines and there were students who couldnt attend online classes Also, there is no solid methodology for calculating the full impact of an Internet shutdown, because in India, the shutdowns are hyper-localised, said Prasanth Sugathan, legal director at SFLC.in.
Read the original post:
Economic Impact: India lost $2.8 bn in 2020 to Internet shutdowns; over double of 20 others - The Indian Express
Security must be in your firms DNA from the get-go – Daily Business
TECH TALK: BILL MAGEE
I love technology, an industry veteran whispered to me during an online e-commerce conference keynote and, of course, I get his point. Smart IT in this digital economy is exciting.
The trouble is far too many tech-related moving parts are set to hit mainstream in the coming months. Thats if the marketing folks are to be believed.
Also, in the light of recent scary headline cybersecurity incidents, its probably wise not to blindly accept all things technological in 2021. No matter how digitally dynamic they might seem and lifesaving for your business.
Tucked almost out of sight of the double-whammy pandemic and political posturing surrounding Brexit, was the tale of a US nuclear weapons agency struck by a cyberattack. Specifically, the National Nuclear Security Administration. Apparently its the Ruskies who are to blame. Again.
Thats right NUCLEAR. You know, end of the world stuff. Right under the noses, in plain sight, if you like, of the planets self-appointed peacekeepers, and with enough to leave any sensible person with a distinct feeling of ill ease about the way ahead.
Call me superstitious, but with a trigger-happy Trump still hanging about the White House, it does make one wonder if hitching an Elon Musk ride to the Moon might not be far enough away.
Add to the mix the next wave of the virus upon all of us and the safest bet might well be the Red Planet.
McAfee internet security folks report online criminal activity now tops $1 trillion annually. Running the numbers this represents one per cent of global GDP, a statistic rising daily.
Actually, it doesnt matter what fancy tech is implemented into a business with the earnest hope of coming out of the pandemic unscathed.
Yes, of course the marketeers will have us believe that to succeed this means embracing an exhaustive digital list.
Of the year ahead even Forbes falls for their line, exclaiming: The technology trends.. everyone must get Ready for Now.
Not really.
If we take a minute to examine the list. Well, actually, itll take longer than that as, according to practically every tech-related press release Ive received of late, every gadget appears to be hitting mainstream the in phrase at the moment.
Some youll already know: fintech 5G, artificial intelligence, robotics and drones, Cloud technologies, and on to the more obscure like digital operations data platforms, anything As a Service, quantum computing, machine learning.
Add new exotic roles reports the Harvey Nash/KPMG 2020 CIO survey. Would you believe *chatbot manager, robot overlord, and omniskilled technocrat.
Seriously though, you can implement all the tech in the world. Unless a clear and thorough cybersecurity policy is built into an organisations DNA from the get-go, then most of it will be a complete waste of time.
As SecureWorks puts it: cybersecurity programs can still thrive with a limited budget and resources if an organisation prioritises investment based on where the greatest risk to a business lies.
In a nutshell this requires addressing strategic security concerns; identifying most common causes of weak security; and implementing low-resource methods for improving your security. Dont hesitate to bring in cost-effective outside help where needed.
Sophos warns that far too many cloud services on offer continue to leave back doors open, ripe for a cyberattack that can completely wipe out an organisation. Irrespective of its size.
Ciaran Martin, new board member at the Scottish Business Resilience Centre, says challenges around security tech are getting increasingly complex.
The former chief executive of the UK National Cyber Security Centre warns us all to guard against a rising tide of cyber scams targeting pandemic fears.
DIGIT highlights a view common to cybersecurity specialists, intelligence officers and policymakers that the worst an online attack could lead to is a nuclear strike.
Martin told the site he is doubtful about this and while such concerns remain valid, the reality is more likely to produce long-term, lingering issues rather than a sudden cataclysm.
More a war of attrition than all-out conflict. So, no need to board that SpaceX rocket to Mars. Not just yet anyway
Related
See the original post here:
Security must be in your firms DNA from the get-go - Daily Business
New leads suggest CIA spied on Assange to secure his extradition to the US – EL PAS in English
New evidence suggests that the CIAs shadow loomed over WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for several months during his long stay at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, through the cooperation of a Spanish security firm that made audio and video recordings of the Australian activists conversations with his lawyers and allegedly relayed this material to US intelligence services. On Monday, a judge in London ruled against extraditing the cyber-activist to the US, where he is facing espionage charges over WikiLeaks release of classified military and diplomatic material in 2010.
An investigation started by Judge Jos de la Mata of Spains High Court, the Audiencia Nacional, and to be continued by his replacement at this courthouse, is tracking the IP addresses unique numbers that identify devices connected to the internet that logged on to the servers of UC Global S.L, the Spanish company in charge of security at the embassy where Assange took refuge between June 2012 and April 2019. The companys servers, where all its information is stored, are located in the southern Spanish city of Jerez de la Frontera.
According to evidence provided by a computer expert who used to work for this company, and who is now a protected witness, the internet service provider (ISP) of one of the IP addresses that accessed the Spanish security companys servers matches that of the US-based The Shadowserver Foundation. According to its website, this organization works with national governments and law enforcement agencies, among others, to expose security vulnerabilities and malicious online activity. Other IPs that accessed the Spanish servers were from Texas, Arizona, Illinois and California.
The Spanish High Courts investigation is currently stalled. Six months after Judge De la Mata requested judicial cooperation from US authorities, asking them for identifying information about the IPs that accessed UC Globals servers, the US justice system has yet to respond. US prosecutors demanded to know the judges sources, and De la Mata sent additional information, but no reply has been forthcoming.
Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has also failed to comply with De la Matas request to take statements from the lawyers who were spied on while working with Assange. These delays are hindering the investigation, according to judicial sources.
The servers of UC Global S.L., a company created by former military officer David Morales, stored dozens of hours worth of illegal recordings, as well as reports on the WikiLeaks founder, his fingerprints, handwriting analyses, and photographs of the passports and cellphones of every visitor who came to see Assange at the embassy, including lawyers, politicians and journalists, as revealed by an EL PAS investigation in 2019.
This evidence of spying against Assange ended up at the High Court after the activists legal team filed a suit against Morales, who was arrested and is being investigated for violation of privacy and client-attorney privilege, as well as bribery and money laundering. De la Mata, who is going to be replaced by Judge Santiago Pedraz, wanted to question Zohar Lahav, the vice-president for security at Las Vegas Sands, a casino owned by Sheldon Adelson, a leading donor to the Republican Party and a personal friend of US President Donald Trump.
Morales used to provide security services for Adelsons luxury yacht on its Mediterranean trips, and the investigation points to the possibility that Lahav may have been the contact point for Morales to offer his information about Assange to the CIA. Judge De la Mata also requested, unsuccessfully so far, to take statements from former Republican Congressman Dana Rohrabacher and from the actress Pamela Anderson, who both visited the activist at the embassy and who were both monitored. Emails exchanged between Morales and his employees in 2017 order the latter to place cameras with secret audio recording capability and microphones in the fire extinguishers of the embassys meeting room and inside the ladies bathroom. These emails are filled with passages suggesting cooperation with US intelligence services, such as a plan to try and sell to the American friends, or we are playing in the big leagues, I have gone over to the dark side, and those in control are friends of the US.
Morales, a former member of the Special Operations Unit of Spains Navy Marines, sent a few of these emails in late January 2017 from The Venetian, a Las Vegas hotel owned by the business magnate Adelson. Morales asked his employees at the Ecuadorean embassy for all available information on the computer and network systems at the diplomatic mission, as well as the telephone numbers of the guest, their codename for Assange.
On January 24, 2017, in a conversation with an employee who is now a protected witness in the case, Morales said: I want you all to be alert because I am told that we may be under surveillance, so anything thats confidential must be encrypted. In another conversation, Morales said: Im involved in something that I expect will get us monitored. How well are we protected against that? The employee listed the companys systems, and Morales replied: I dont think thats going to be a problem for those who may want to take a look at us [...] what can we do if a stars-and-stripes agency wants to look at us? The employee replied: I figured thats what this was about.
In another email sent from Miami in July 2017, Morales asked one of his most trusted aides to send him the estimate for the audio-enabled cameras that would later be installed at the embassy. Send it to me so that I can hand it in when I meet [with unspecified persons], he wrote, adding an emoji of a winking Donald Trump. In another email exchange asking for the access manual to the profiles website, there was a Trump emoji with its hands on its head. Morales had asked his employees to draft and store background information about every person who came to visit Assange, with Russian and American nationals viewed as priority targets. Using the expression selling to the friends I told you about, Morales mentioned the September 2017 visit by Yanis Varoufakis, the Greek economist and politician. These kinds of visits and connections could be interesting. We need to indicate the reason for the visit, and who he was with. Morales also ordered his workers to place stickers on the embassy windows to enable the recording of conversations from outside the building, according to witness accounts obtained by this newspaper.
Assange had himself installed a white noise lamp inside the meeting room, and he would turn it on every time he met with anyone because he suspected that he was under surveillance. An investigation by The New York Times has revealed that Assange became a priority target for the CIA under its then-director Mike Pompeo. Official sources told that newspaper that WikiLeaks was investigated in search of alleged ties between Assange and Russian intelligence.
English version by Susana Urra.
Original post:
New leads suggest CIA spied on Assange to secure his extradition to the US - EL PAS in English
Five Common Excuses for Lack of Firmware Security – Infosecurity Magazine
Firmware software designed specifically for hardware such as hard drives, USB or UEFI is critical for every business. Every computer and smart device is built from dozens of such components, and hardware security vulnerabilities are real and increasing.
Forrester Research revealed 63% of organizations experienced one or more data breaches due to firmware or hardware vulnerabilities in the past year. Security professionals most senior bosses may not know about firmware security in-depth, but it is their responsibility to know how important it is.
Business leaders are recognizing they have a vital responsibility to ask their security team smart questions about security, and this includes firmware; but all too often responses from security professionals fall into one of five common excuses.
Excuse one Bad actors need physical access to infiltrate the network
It is a myth that bad actors need physical access to infiltrate networks. Physical tampering is arguably the most widely known firmware security attack but isnt the only method.
There are other ways, such as supply chain attacks, whereby manufacturers or those in charge of system delivery could manipulate firmware; unknown implants could be left undetected in a data center for decades.
Hackers can also attack applications or systems remotely to exploit firmware for sabotage or persistent surveillance, while malicious actors can also access some firmware components on the internet in the same way as applications.
Excuse two The supply chain process has inherent security checks
Security checks for accurate data, software vulnerability management, incident response and more are available in many organizations supply chain processes. However, it is rare for security teams to check and verify firmware and hardware integrity during supply chain processes. This means attackers have a chance to not only access hidden backdoors but maintain them while going under the cybersecurity teams radar.
Insider threats are real recently a black hat hacker attempted to recruit a Tesla employee to install malware for $1 million. Any organization, especially one with valuable secrets, needs to take this seriously.
Excuse three The firmware is already secure
No one should assume their firmware is already secure it is an ongoing process. Cybersecurity teams need to document exact steps taken to identify and mitigate against threats, and then assume there are more they have missed and keep searching.
Firmware vulnerabilities can be located in almost any device or system component; they often show up in security features such as privileges and access control, and often are discovered too late. Organizations must put in place regular patching practices to increase security, or face leaving hidden and persistent backdoors, lowering the bar for hackers.
Excuse four There are other things to prioritize
This response is easy to understand COVID-19 put a lot of pressure on security teams and budgets, and it may have been tempting to see firmware security as less of a priority than issues such as cloud migration of patching programs.
In recent years, most exploitations have been application or operating system-related, and the number of cyber-criminals with in-depth knowledge and experience with firmware was relatively small. However, more research is being published that is revealing attackers stepping up their efforts to exploit vulnerabilities in firmware.
If organizations continue to underestimate the importance of firmware security, they are either ignoring or accepting the constantly increasing risks. Security leaders must update their risk and threat management programs to ensure firmware and supply chain security is included.
Excuse five firmware attacks are not real
Firmware attacks are real, there is no doubt. Since the Shadow Brokers activity in 2013, documented and dangerous firmware attacks have been on the rise from a range of bad actors, including commercial hackers whose main method of breach is firmware backdoors.
Lack of security monitoring at this level, however, means there is likely far more going on behind the scenes than is discovered and reported.
What security teams should say and do
When communicating with business leaders about firmware security, I often use a metaphor we all know and understand - home security. If all the doors and windows are open in our homes and valuable possessions are on display, we might as well be saying thieves welcome here.
Firmware security is no different. Security professionals need to ask, Did I patch that vulnerability? as much as Did I lock the front door? Security teams should use a Zero Trust policy around firmware, implement continuous patching and configuration management, monitor critical servers, and scan devices that have been in insecure environments. Also make sure to practice essential security hygiene.
If organizations dont lock down firmware, attackers could sneak in the back door and grab IP and customer data. There is no good excuse for lack of firmware security.
Read more:
Five Common Excuses for Lack of Firmware Security - Infosecurity Magazine
TalkTalk Discount 145Mbps G.fast Ultrafast Broadband to 14 – ISPreview.co.uk
Wednesday, January 6th, 2021 (3:04 pm) - Score 480
Budget UK ISP TalkTalk has introduced a new discount that cuts the price of their hybrid fibre G.fast based Fibre 150 (145Mbps average download, 25Mbps upload) broadband package to just 14 per month for the first six months of service, which then rises to 28 for the remaining part of the 18 month term (39.95 thereafter).
As usual the package price includes phone line rental (standard call rates), an 18-month long contract term, unlimited usage, internet security, nuisance call blocking and their latest Wi-Fi Hub router. The ISP also applies a 30-day connection guarantee, which allows you to leave penalty free within the first month if youre unhappy. TalkTalks website states that theres no set-up fee, but this isnt entirely correct as you do have to pay 4.95 (one-off) for router delivery.
We should point out that the G.fast network currently only covers around 2.8 million UK premises and its also no longer being deployed, with the priority having shifted to FTTP instead. However, given today news from Openreach (here), its also worth noting that if you place an order for this then it may not be installed until 1st March or later due to the impact of the new COVID-19 lockdown.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)
Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.
NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
View post:
TalkTalk Discount 145Mbps G.fast Ultrafast Broadband to 14 - ISPreview.co.uk
Internet Security Market Classification, Opportunities, Types, Applications, Status and Forecast to 2026 | HPE, IBM, Intel, Symantec – BIZNEWS
This research report is equipped with the information categorizing the Internet Security Market by parameters such as players, brands, regions, types, and applications. The report also details the information about the global market status, competition landscape, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, challenges and opportunities, and porters forces analysis to these elements.
Key Companies Covered: HPE, IBM, Intel, Symantec, AlienVault, BlackStratus, Check Point Software Technologies, Cisco, Cyren, Fortinet, F-Secure, Gemalto.
This report also researches and evaluates the impact of the Covid-19 outbreak on the Internet Security industry, involving potential opportunities and challenges, drivers, and risks. We present the impact assessment of Covid-19 effects on the Internet Security and market growth forecast based on the different scenarios (optimistic, pessimistic, very optimistic, most likely, etc.).
You can get the sample copy of this report now @https://www.reportsintellect.com/sample-request/1652922
Internet Security Market:- Reports Intellect represents the detailed analysis of the parent market based on elite players, present, past and futuristic data which will offer as a profitable guide for all Internet Security Market competitors. The overall analysis Advanced Internet Security Market covers an overview of the industry policies that Internet Security market significantly, the cost structure of the products available in the market, and their manufacturing chain.
Product Type SegmentationNetwork Layer SecurityInternet Protocol SecurityMulti-Factor AuthenticationSecurity TokenElectronic Mail Security/Firewalls
Industry SegmentationGovernmentBanking, Financial Services, and insurance (BFSI)ManufacturingInformation communication and technology (ICT)Retail/Healthcare
Get an Instant discount @https://www.reportsintellect.com/discount-request/1652922
Overview of the chapters analyzing the Internet Security Market in detail
Chapter 1 details the information relating to Internet Security Market Introduction, Scope of the product, market overview, Market risks, driving forces of the market, etc
Chapter 2 analyses the top manufacturers of the Internet Security Market by sales, revenue, etc for the period 2021 to 2026
Chapter 3 throws light on the competition landscape amongst the top manufacturers based on sales, revenue, market share, etc for the period 2021 to 2026.
Chapter 4 analyses the global market by region and their market share, sales, revenue, etc for the period 2021 to 2026.
Chapter 5 to 9 analyze the key regions with key countries based on market share, revenue, sales, etc.
Chapter 10 and 11 contain information about market basis type and application, sales market share, growth rate, etc for the period 2021 to 2026.
Chapter 12 focuses on the market forecast for 2021 to 2026 for the Patient Derived Continuous for Internet Security Market by regions, type and application, sales, and revenue.
Chapter 13 to 15 contain the details related to sales channels, distributors, traders, dealers, research findings, research findings, and conclusions, etc for the Internet Security Market.
Reasons why you should buy this report :
Understand the current and future of the Internet Security Market in both developed and emerging markets.
The report assists in realigning the business strategies by highlighting the key business priorities.
The report throws light on the segment expected to dominate the Internet Security Market
Forecasts the regions expected to witness the fastest growth.
The latest developments in the Patient-Derived for Internet Security Market and details of the market leaders along with their market share and strategies.
Saves time on the entry level research as the report contains vital information about growth, size, leading players, and segments of the market.
The forecast assists in drafting expansion plans in the business.
About Us:
Reports Intellect is your one-stop solution for everything related to market research and market intelligence. We understand the importance of market intelligence and its need in todays competitive world.
Our professional team works hard to fetch the most authentic research reports backed with impeccable data figures which guarantee outstanding results every time for you.
So whether it is the latest report from the researchers or a custom requirement, our team is here to help you in the best possible way.
Contact Us:
PH +1-706-996-2486
US Address:
225 Peachtree Street NE,
Suite 400,
Atlanta, GA 30303
Read the original here:
Internet Security Market Classification, Opportunities, Types, Applications, Status and Forecast to 2026 | HPE, IBM, Intel, Symantec - BIZNEWS
Automation for Better or Worse in 2021 – Infosecurity Magazine
Technology always has a good side and a dark side, particularly when it comes to cybersecurity. You just have to look at the debate on encryption and backdoors to see how advanced technology can be used by the bad guys as effectively as it is by those trying to protect our privacy and security.
Automationis another technology that works for better or worse, and will play a major rolein shapingcybersecurity attack anddefenseactivities in the next 12 months as it becomes faster and more sophisticated.
For example, spear phishing is traditionally ahigh-investment, high-return targeted attack activity. As automation tools replace manual techniques, cyber-criminals can launch spear phishing campaigns at record volumes by harvesting victim-specific data from social media sites and company web pages. As society continues to grapple with the impact of COVID-19, it is likely that these automated spear phishing attacks will prey on fears around the pandemic, politics and the economy.
Conversely, as more businesses migrate to the cloud, automation willalso help cloud-hostingproviderssuch as Amazon, Microsoft and Google to crackdown on cyber-criminal groups abusing their reputation and services to launch malicious attacks. Threat actors commonly host website HTML files designed to mimic a legitimate website like Microsoft365 or Google Drive to steal credentials submitted by unsuspecting victims. In 2021, we will see these companies deploying automated tools and file validation technologies that will spot spoofed authentication portals.
SaaS risks
As Software as a Service (SaaS) continues to grow in popularity, especiallyas more employees work from home, authentication and credentials will pose the weakest link.With the wealth of corporate data held inSaaS solutions, cyber-criminals can use bulk stolen credentials to target authentication portals.
So, we can expect to seean increase inpassword spraying or credential stuffing attacks against popular SaaS offerings,in the hope thatemployeesusethe same password fromanothersite that suffered a data leak.
VPNs and endpoints
So, what else can we expect in the next 12 months and beyond? Certainly, the tumultuous events of 2020 will impact the threat landscapefor years to come.In particular, as more companies adoptor growVPNs andRemote Desktop Protocol(RDP)solutions to provide secure connections to employeesworking from home,we think that attacks against VPNs and RDPs will double in 2021. If an attacker can compromise VPN, RDP or remote connection servers, they have an unobstructed path intothecorporate network.
Security gaps in endpoints have also become a high priority target for attackersduring the global pandemicandmany personal home computersstill runninglegacy softwarethat is difficult to patch or update.
For example, as Microsofthas just endedits extended support programfor Windows 7, organizationsshould expect at least one major new Windows 7 vulnerabilitytomake the headlines next year.
Credential crisis
Authentication is the cornerstone of strong security;but with billions of usernames and passwordsavailableon the dark webandthe prevalence of automated authentication attacks,no internet-exposed service is safe from cyber intrusion if it isnt using strong multi-factor authentication (MFA). Companies are waking up to the fact that they can no longer rely on simple credentials for logins and any service that is not protected by MFA, is highly likely to be compromised in 2021.
Whose data is it anyway?
Back in the home, the last few years have seen a rapid increase in the use of digital assistants such as Alexa, Google Assistant and Siri, along with smart home systems to automatically control lights, room temperatures and access, while wearable devices track and sense critical health parameters. Behind the scenes, machine learning algorithms harness and correlate data to document user activities, behaviors, connections and interests.
This means that a lot of our data is getting into other peoples hands and we think that 2021 will mark a tipping point when consumers will begin to fully-understand and revolt against the privacy concerns associated with smart and connected devices. We will see users start to push back against vendors of IoT devices that collect personal data and will pressure governments to regulate the capabilities of these devices to protect their privacy.
Will it, wont it?
As we have learntin 2020, it is very difficult to predict what is going to happen in the future butour Threat Lab team along with other researchers around the world havean increasing level of analytics and insight to makewell-informedguesses.
Cyber-criminals always lookforthe weak links, so the growing ranks of home workers are an obvious target andwhen it comes tonew technologies such asautomation and AI. What can work for good, can also be exploited for malicious activity.Its just a case of trying to stay one step ahead.
Here is the original post:
Automation for Better or Worse in 2021 - Infosecurity Magazine
SolarWinds Attack: ‘This Hit the Security Community Hard’ – BankInfoSecurity.com
3rd Party Risk Management , Application Security , Cybercrime as-a-service
The SolarWinds breach is a case study in how attackers can subvert a widely used piece of software to turn it to their advantage, says Lou Manousos, CEO of RiskIQ.
See Also: The SASE Model: A New Approach to Security
"The magnitude of this attack is hard to overstate," Manousos says. "Having a supply chain vendor like this - with a legitimate program that is trusted - used to carry out an attack, it's just unprecedented.
"The number of organizations that have been hit, the types of organizations - some really advanced security programs - I think we're all shocked to see how the traditional protection that has been put in place just wasn't as effective as we would have liked when we have trusted software like this."
In this video interview with Information Security Media Group, Manousos discusses:
Manousos is CEO and co-founder of RiskIQ. As CEO, he has spearheaded a new approach that helps internet, financial services, healthcare, media and consumer packaged goods companies protect their brands from online fraud. Manousos is a recognized expert in internet security and fraud prevention who has been developing and delivering enterprise protection technologies for more than 15 years.
Original post:
SolarWinds Attack: 'This Hit the Security Community Hard' - BankInfoSecurity.com