Category Archives: Quantum Computing
Global Quantum Computing Market Predicted to Garner $667.3 Million by 2027, Growing at 30.0% CAGR from 2020 to 2027 – [193 pages] Informative Report…
New York, USA, Dec. 22, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A latest report published by Research Dive on the globalquantum computing market sheds light on the current outlook and future growth of the market. As per the report, the global quantum computing market is expected to garner $667.3 million by growing at a CAGR of 30.0% from 2020 to 2027. This report is drafted by market experts by evaluating all the important aspects of the market. It is a perfect source of information and statistics for new entrants, market players, shareholders, stakeholders, investors, etc.
Check out How COVID-19 impacts the Global Quantum Computing Market. Click here to Connect with our Analyst to get more Market Insight: https://www.researchdive.com/connect-to-analyst/8332
Exclusive Offer - As we are running Anniversary discount, here are some additional benefits which you are entitled to avail with this report.
Free Excel Data Pack The report will cover impact of COVID-19 on this market. 20% Free Customisation 16 analyst hours support Quarterly Update on Enterprise License 24 hours priority response
Download Sample Report of the Global Quantum Computing Market and Reveal the Market Overview, Opportunity, Expansion, Growth and More: https://www.researchdive.com/download-sample/8332
The report includes:
A summary of the market with its definition, advantages, and application areas. Detailed insights on market position, dynamics, statistics, growth rate, revenues, market shares, and future predictions. Key market segments, boomers, restraints, and investment opportunities. Present situation of the global as well as regional market from the viewpoint of companies, countries, and end industries. Information on leading companies, current market trends and developments, Porter Five Analysis, and top winning business strategies.
Factors Impacting the Market Growth:
As per the report, the growing cyber-attacks across the world is hugely contributing to the growth of the global quantum computing market. Moreover, the rising implementation of quantum computing technologies in agriculture for helping farmers to improve the efficiency and yield of crops is likely to unlock rewarding opportunities for the market growth. However, absence of highly experienced employees, having knowledge regarding quantum computing is likely to hinder the market growth.
Access Varied Market Reports Bearing Extensive Analysis of the Market Situation, Updated With The Impact of COVID-19: https://www.researchdive.com/covid-19-insights
COVID-19 Impact Analysis:
The sudden outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic has made a significant impact on the global quantum computing market. During this crisis period, quantum computing technology can be used for medical research and other activities related to COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the technology can be beneficial for developing advanced drugs at an accelerated speed and for analyzing different types of interactions between biomolecules and fight infectious like viruses. In addition, businesses are greatly investing in the development of quantum computers for drug discovery amidst the crisis period. All these factors are expected to unlock novel investment opportunities for the market growth in the upcoming years.
Check out all Information and communication technology & media Industry Reports: https://www.researchdive.com/information-and-communication-technology-and-media
Segment Analysis:
The report segments the quantum computing market into offerings type, end user, and application.
By offerings type, the report further categorizes the market into: Consulting solutions Systems
Among these, the systems segment is expected to dominate the market by garnering a revenue of $313.3 million by 2027. This is mainly due to growing use of quantum computing in AI, radar making, machine learning technologies, and many others.
Based on application, the report further classifies the market into: Optimization Machine Learning Material Simulation
Among these, themachine learning segment is expected to observe accelerated growth and garner $236.9 million by 2027. This is mainly due to significant role of quantum computing in enhancing runtime, capacity, and learning efficiency. Moreover, quantum machine learning has the potential to speed-up various machine learning processes such as optimization, linear algebra, deep learning, and Kernel evaluation, which is likely to boost the market growth during the forecast period.
Regional Analysis:
The report explains the lookout of the global quantum computing market across several regions, including: Europe Asia Pacific LAMEA North America
Among these, the Asia-Pacific region is estimated to lead the market growth by growing at a striking growth rate of 31.60% during the forecast period. This is mainly because of the growing adoption of quantum computing technologies in numerous sectors including chemicals, healthcare, utilities & pharmaceuticals, and others in this region.
Market Players and Business Strategies:
The report offers a list of global key players in the quantum computing market and discloses some of their strategies and developments. The key players listed in the report are:
QC Ware, Corp. Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited D-Wave Systems Inc., International Business Machines Corporation Rigetti Computing 1QB Information Technologies River Lane Research StationQ Microsoft Anyon Google Inc.
These players are massively contributing to the growth of the market by performing activities such as mergers and acquisitions, novel developments, geographical expansions, and many more.
Our market experts have made use of several tools, methodologies, and research methods to get in-depth insights of the global quantum computing sector. Moreover, we strive to deliver a customized report to fulfill special requirements of our clients, on demand.Click Here to Get Absolute Top Companies Development Strategies Summary Report.
TRENDING REPORTS WITH COVID-19 IMPACT ANALYSIS
Mobile Device Management Market https://www.researchdive.com/412/mobile-device-management-marketData Center Power Market https://www.researchdive.com/415/data-center-power-marketAugmented Reality (AR) in Healthcare Market https://www.researchdive.com/covid-19-insights/218/global-augmented-reality-ar-in-healthcare-marketAI in Construction Market https://www.researchdive.com/covid-19-insights/222/ai-in-construction-market
Two Years into the Government’s National Quantum Initiative – Nextgov
Monday markedtwo years since the passage of the National Quantum Initiative, or NQI Actand in that time, federal agencies followed through on its early calls and helped lay the groundwork for new breakthroughs across the U.S. quantum realm.
Now, the sights of those helping implement the law are set on the future.
I would say in five years, something we'd love to see is ... a better idea of, What are the applications for a quantum computer thats buildable in the next fiveto 10 years, that would be beneficial to society? the Office of Science and Technology Policy Assistant Director for Quantum Information Science Dr. Charles Tahan told Nextgov in an interview Friday. He also serves as the director of the National Quantum Coordination Officea cooperation-pushing hub established by the legislation.
Tahan reflected on some foundational moves made over the last 24 months and offered a glimpse into his teams big-ticket priorities for 2021.
Quantum devices and technologies are among an ever-evolving field that hones in on phenomena at the atomic scale. Potential applications are coming to light, and are expected to radically reshape science, engineering, computing, networking, sensing, communication and more. They offer promises like unhackable internet or navigation support in places disconnected from GPS.
Federal agencies have a long history of exploring physical sciences and quantum-related pursuitsbut previous efforts were often siloed. Signed by President Donald Trump in 2018, the NQI Act sought to provide for a coordinated federal program to accelerate quantum research and development for the economic and national security of America. It assigned specific jobs for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Energy Department and National Science Foundation, among others, and mandated new collaborations to boost the nations quantum workforce talent pipeline and strengthen societys grasp of this relatively fresh area of investment. The functions of the National Quantum Coordination Office, or NQCO, were also set forth in the bill, and it was officially instituted in early 2019. Since then, the group has helped connect an array of relevant stakeholders and facilitate new initiatives proposed by the law.
Now, everything that's been called out in the act has been establishedits started up, Tahan explained. He noted the three agencies with weighty responsibilities spent 2019 planning out their courses of action within their communities, and this year, subsequently launched weighty new efforts.
One of the latest was unveiled in August by the Energy Department, which awarded $625 million over five yearssubject to appropriationsto its Argonne, Brookhaven, Fermi, Oak Ridge and Lawrence Berkeley national laboratories to establish QIS Research Centers. In each, top thinkers will link up to push forward collaborative research spanning many disciplines. Academic and private-sector institutions also pledged to provide $340 million in contributions for the work.
These are about $25 million eachthat's a tremendous amount of students, and postdocs, and researchers, Tahan said. And those are spread out across the country, focusing on all different areas of quantum: computing, sensing and networking.
NSF this summer also revealed the formation of new Quantum Leap Challenge Institutes to tackle fundamental research hurdles in quantum information science and engineering over the next half-decade. The University of Colorado, University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign, and University of California, Berkeley are set to head and house the first three institutes, though Tahan confirmed more could be launched next year. The initiative is backed by $75 million in federal fundingand while it will take advantage of existing infrastructures, non-governmental entities involved are also making their own investments and constructing new facilities.
That's the foundation, you know, Tahan said. The teams have been formed, the research plans have been writtenthat's a tremendous amount of workand now they're off actually working. So now, we start to reap the rewards because all the heavy lifting of getting people organized has been done.
Together with NSF, OSTP also helped set in motion the National Q-12 Education Partnership. It intends to connect public, private and academic sector quantum players and cohesively create and release learning materials to help U.S. educators produce new courses to engage students with quantum fields. The work is ultimately meant to spur K-12 students' interest in the emerging areas earlier into their education, and NSF will award nearly $1 million across QIS education efforts through the work.
And beyond the governments walls and those of academia, the NQI Act also presented new opportunities for industry. Meeting the laws requirements, NIST helped convene a consortium of cross-sector stakeholders to strategically confront existing quantum-related technology, standards and workforce gaps, and needs. This year, that groupthe Quantum Economic Development Consortium, or QED-Cbloomed in size, established a more formal membership structure and announced companies that make up its steering committee.
It took a year or more to get all these companies together and then write partnership agreements. So, that partnership agreement was completed towards the beginning of summer, and the steering committee signed it over the summer, and now there are I think 100 companies or so who have signed it, Tahan said. So, it's up and running. It's a real economic development consortiumthats a technical thingand that's a big deal. And how big it is, and how fast it's growing is really, really remarkable.
This fall also brought the launch of quantum.gov, a one-stop website streamlining federal work and policies. The quantum coordination office simultaneously released a comprehensive roadmap pinpointing crucial areas of needed research, deemed the Quantum Frontiers Report.
That assessment incorporates data collected from many workshops, and prior efforts OSTP held to promote the national initiative and establishes eight frontiers that contain core problems with fundamental questions confronting QIS today and must be addressed to push forward research and development breakthroughs in the space. They include expanding opportunities for quantum technologies to benefit society, characterizing and mitigating quantum errors, and more.
It tries to cut through the hype a little bit, Tahan explained. It's a field that requires deep technical expertise. So, it's easy to be led in the wrong direction if you don't have all the data. So we try to narrow it down into here are the important problems, here's what we really don't know, heres what we do know, and go this way, and that will, hopefully benefit the whole enterprise.
Quantum-focused strides have also been made by the U.S. on the international front. Tahan pointed to the first quantum cooperation agreement signed between America and Japan late last year, which laid out basic core values guiding their working together.
We've been using that as a model to engage with other countries. We've had high-level meetings with Australia, industry collaborations with the U.K., and we're engaging with other countries. So, that's progressing, Tahan said. Many countries are interested in quantum as you can guesstheres a lot of investments around the worldand many want to work with us on going faster together.
China had also made its own notable quantum investments (some predating the NQI Act), and touted new claims of quantum supremacy, following Google, on the global stage this year.
I wouldn't frame it as a competition ... We are still very much in the research phase here, and we'll see how those things pan out, Tahan said. I think we're taking the right steps, collectively. The U.S. ecosystem of companies, nonprofits and governments arebased on our strategy, both technical and policiesgoing in the right direction and making the right investments.
Vice President-elect Kamala Harris previously put forthlegislationto broadly advance quantum research, but at this point, the Biden administration hasnt publicly shared any intentions to prioritize government-steered ongoing or future quantum efforts.
[One of] the big things we're looking towards in the next year, is workforce development. We have a critical shortage or need for talent in this space. Its a very diverse set of skills. With these new centers, just do the math. How many students and postdocs are you going to need to fill up those, to do all that research? It's a very large number, Tahan said. And so we're working on something to create that pipeline.
In that light, the team will work to continue to develop NSFs ongoing, Q-12 partnership. Theyll also reflect on whats been built so far through the national initiative to identify any crucial needs that may have been looked over.
As you stand something up thats really big, you're always going to make some mistakes. What have you missed? Tahan noted.
And going forward, the group plans to hone deeper in on balancing the economic and security implications of the burgeoning fields.
As the technology gets more and more advanced, how do we be first to realize everything but also protect our investments? Tahan said. And getting that balance right is going to require careful policy thinking about how to update the way the United States does things.
Continue reading here:
Two Years into the Government's National Quantum Initiative - Nextgov
Bitcoin is quantum computing resistant regardless of rising fears among investors – FXStreet
All cryptocurrencies are based on cryptography and require miners to solve extremely complex mathematical problems in order to secure the network. The idea behind quantum computing is that it will be able to crack Bitcoins algorithm much faster than the network.
The basic principle is that Bitcoins network has to be sufficiently fast in order for a quantum attacker to not have enough time to derive the private key of a specific public key before the network.
So far, it seems that quantum computers would take around 8 hours to derive a Bitcoin private key which, in theory, means the network is secure against them. It seems that the mark right now is around 10 minutes. If quantum computers can get close to this time, the Bitcoin network could be compromised.
Its also important to note that quantum computing not only poses a threat to Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies but to other platforms, even banks. Many platforms use encryption which would be broken if quantum computing becomes real, which means the implications of this technology go way beyond just cryptocurrencies.
Theoretically, cryptocurrencies have several ways to mitigate or completely stop quantum computing attacks in the future. For instance, a soft fork on the network of an asset could be enough to at least move some of the assets that are insecure.
Additionally, there are many algorithms that are theorized to be quantum-resistant. In fact, SHA-256 which is currently used should be resistant to these types of attacks. According to recent statistics, around 25% of Bitcoin in circulation remains vulnerable to quantum attacks. You should transfer your coins to a new p2pkh address to make sure they are safe.
More here:
Bitcoin is quantum computing resistant regardless of rising fears among investors - FXStreet
Fidelity Investments leaps back to the future in an experiment to restore active management to its lofty perch, using technology that is still more…
The Boston giant is renting a special corner of Amazon's cloud to remake Monte Carlo and do hyper-quant investing like an AI Peter Lynch, with no experience as a golf caddy.
Brooke's Note: Passive indexing is done by computers that mostly make sure that theybet on nothing but the diversity implicit in any given index of securities. It's an approach where wisdom of knowing how little you know -- and executing it with mechanical precision -- mostly beats market timing done byyounger, smarter computers, never mind smarter, or dumber, people. The passive approach now attracts the most dollars because it is cheaper andbetter, or better because it's cheaper. But it's easy to see why smart people with smart computers wouldn't want to accept this new odd reality lying down, and Fidelity's people, it seems areamong them. The logic to its FCAT quantum project with Amazonis that a tipping point back to active managers beating passive onesis bound to come alongif computers keep getting smarter. Of course, active managers eventually outsmart each other, which blunts any advantages, so it's key to be first. Fidelity Investments is trying to do just that by playing the quantum revolution.
Fidelity Investments is exploring a path out of the drab world of passive investing backto the greener pastures of active management, using a technology that, until recently, was more science fiction than fact.
That path is being charted deep within the bowels of the Boston giant at its Center for Applied Technology (FCAT). It'son a never-ending mission to find "breakthrough achievements in research and tech,"according to its website.
And, it thinks it's found one in the latest advances in quantum computing.Itpromises to revitalize active management, where the fees are fat and the returns are -- hopefully -- fatter.
Fidelity's latest research project runs FCAT-developed quantum algorithms through Amazon's Braket, arecently launchedcloudservicethatruns on three super-computers, D-Wave, IonQand Rigetti.
Quantum computers areable to solve certaincomputational problems, infinitely faster than classical computers. They havefour major potential benefits for financial firms.
It speeds up market forecasting, cryptographyand data gathering,and makes it more precise, says Fidelity head of emerging technologyAdam Schouela.
It is a quest for the proverbial quantum leap.
"We're looking for those technologies that truly have that potential to displace technologies we're using today," he says."That's where quantum computing fits in."
In August, Fidelity completed a quantum computing proof-of-concept in conjunction with Amazon that promises faster and more accurate asset pricing, investment analytics, tradingand Monte Carlo analyses.
"Active investing is in Fidelitys DNA,"says Will Trout, director of wealth management at Pleasanton, Calif.-based consultancy, Javelin Strategy & Research, via email.
"Whether supported by the boffins or cutting-edge technology ... avenues where it's still possible to outperform and get paid ... will remain on the Fidelity road map," he explains.
FCATs latest project created a security not unlike an index ETF that tracked a synthesized index in close to real time with a lower rate of error than currently possible. By further crunchingthe data, it yieldednear real-time asset pricing, inclusive of options trades.
That said, Schouelais careful to temper expectations.
"I wouldn't necessarily call it a gamble but I wouldn't call it a 'will'... as in will potentially."
Fidelity is also one of the few firms withdeep enough pockets to pull off a project like this in such a nascent technology, says Lex Sokolin, global fintech co-head at New York City blockchain software company, ConsenSys, via email.
"With mutual fund AUM over [$3.5] trillion, Fidelity is able to partner and have a meaningful conversation with [firms like] Amazon ... these are big fixed-cost projects, and technology firms need to find a use case that works for millions." See:Fidelity Investments takes another leap into the future, enlisting Amazon to turn advisors into virtual reality avatars, but some say it's pie-in-the-sky.
Although quantum computing has potential long-term benefits for the financial industry, the field itself remains closer to the whiteboard than the shop floor.
Between 1977 and 1990, when Peter Lynch managed Fidelity's Magellan Fund, he averaged a 29.2% annual return, increasing assets from $18 million to$14 billion.
The legendary investor got recruited by a Fidelity exec who saw promise in his caddy -- an approach to capturing lucrative decision-making capabilities regarded by most HR departments as too hit-or-miss in 2020.
Indeed, many of FCATs own staff have yet to come to terms with quantum computing.
The firm uses a mix of workshops and virtual reality to get its employees thinking about the "mental shift" quantum-design requires.
"Quantum computing is in the very early stages of considering commercialization," Sokolin explains.
"This hardware is important, as are its uses, but I expect the discussion to stay in innovation labs for another few years. Much of what is happening today is finding the problems that fit the types of solutions that quantum computation can provide."
But a developmental leap is in the offing, similar to the shift from hexadecimal machine code to programming in English-like script, and Fidelity intends to capitalize, says Schouela.
"There are these layers of abstraction [that have] started to form for quantum computing [and] as soon as the technology is viable, we have the ability to leverage it to the benefit of Fidelity."
Typically, the now 20 year-old FCAT spends between three- to seven-years working on a project before it gets tucked into Fidelity or spun-off.
Fidelity's ability to succeed depends on its ability to make a portfolio of bets where failure or cold storageis an option.
"We shelve stuff all the time," Schouela says. " [and] sometimes the markets not ready for something yet it's an exploration."
'Incidental' pairing
The Fidelity-Amazon quantum partnership is also the fourth time the two firms have worked together since anearly attemptat joint distribution in 2006.
In May 2018, Fidelity developed a chatbot Cora built on AWS Sumerian, a VR design tool; and later Fidelity strengthened its VR partnership with Amazon as it pursued VR advice and training systems, the latter of which are now in use.
Then, in late 2019, Amazon chose Fidelity as its new 401(k) vendor. See:Fidelity wrests high-profile Amazon 401(k) business from Vanguard.
But the two firms continued partnering is merely "incidental", rather than strategic, says Schouela, who worked on Fidelity's VR projects.
"Its completely different folks [at Amazon this time] so it is a little bit more on the incidental side were [also] actively working with lots of different people in this space."
Fidelity's ownership of the algorithm-basedshort-selling asset manager Geode -- a 2003 Fidelity spin-off -- and its stake in ESG investment manager Ethic are examples of the firm's continued interest in active-management. See:Fidelity Investments inks deal with $180-million startup.
"Fidelity, led by [CEO] Abby Johnson in this context has unlimited thirst for advantage," saysSteve Gresham, managing principal of NYC consultancy, The Execution Project, via email.
Johnson has, for example, pushed the family firm toward crypto-currency.Fidelity Investments applies its proven Peter Jubber to its unproven bitcoin unit and its launch of Fidelity Digital Funds signals it's all in on blockchain currency
Yet Amazon will win downstream, says Sokolin.
"If it can help financial firms, whether Fidelity, hedge funds, or market makers more efficiently price financial instruments at scale [for] the entire market in real time, then it can become the de facto analytics engine for financial services."
"This would again mean that technology firms become more powerful relative to the existingfinancial ecosystem," he adds.
Amazon uses neutral language.
"Our goal for Braket is to be a catalyst,"says AWS vice president for technology, Bill Vass,in a release.
Read the original post:
Fidelity Investments leaps back to the future in an experiment to restore active management to its lofty perch, using technology that is still more...
World first Australian solution to protect sensitive data from Quantum threat – Industry Update Manufacturing Media
An Australian cybersecurity specialist has announced the first quantum resistant network encryption capability, protecting sensitive government and business network data against the emerging threat of quantum computing.
Senetass Quantum evolution enables customers to combine both conventional and quantum safe encryption in a single platform and provides a secure transition to a future quantum-safe world.
Universally regarded as the most significant threat to cybersecurity in history, quantum computing in the hands of bad actors will render today's encryption inadequate.
Senetas CEO, Andrew Wilson, said that as quantum computing becomes a reality, organisations around the world should develop a quantum security strategy and start planning to implement quantum resistant encryption sooner rather than later, to be certain network data is secure for the long-term.
At its essence, quantum computing uses principles of quantum mechanics to perform certain calculations and tasks at phenomenal speeds. IBM, Google and Microsoft, along with many state sponsored programs, are competing to develop a quantum computer outside a lab environment, Mr Wilson said.
The advent of the worlds first practical quantum computer will render todays conventional public key encrypted infrastructures unsecure, making sensitive information vulnerable across governments, defence agencies, and businesses public and private networks.
Today, to decrypt conventionally encrypted data could take thousands of man-years using the most powerful computers available. In the future quantum computers will enable decryption of that data in a matter of seconds, minutes or hours. Good cybersecurity demands that data be secure for the very long-term.
Senetas quantum resistant security is available to all current and future customers whom use the companys crypto-agile encryption platforms.
Senetas is the first to take to market defence-grade high-speed network encryptors that can provide Quantum Resistant Encryption (QRE) in addition to todays state-of-the-art classical encryption security. Our government, defence and business customers can make a secure transition to a future quantum-safe world. Mr Wilson said.
IBM estimates that a working quantum computer outside a lab environment will be a reality within the next five years. However, the likelihood that rogue states are working on quantum computing is high, and it is possible that quantum computing will be in use before the world is alerted to its development.
Senetas is an all-Australian cybersecurity developer and manufacturer and Australias largest cybersecurity exporter.
In Australia, we have recently seen large-scale cyber-attacks attributed to bad state-based actors. Similar cyber-attacks using quantum computers will be devastating unless the data is protected by quantum resistant encryption. Mr Wilson said.
Governments and businesses around the world use todays conventional encryption to protect sensitive data such as private citizen information, intellectual property; government, defence and business secrets and access to critical national infrastructure control systems. Today, they can have the added security of quantum resistant network data encryption capability to ensure they remain secure in the future.
The Senetas quantum resistant encryption network security solution supports all of the quantum safe encryption algorithms selected as finalists by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) prior to their expected standardisation as soon as 2022.
The Senetas solution also supports the latest European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI) standards for quantum key distribution an important and emerging security capability that has application in 5G networks. Future proofing encryption solutions today requires a hybrid of conventional cryptography and quantum resistant encryption techniques.
Senetas's quantum resistant encryption will be available to existing customers on their current platforms. The availability of quantum resistant capabilities in a commercial product today, marrying both conventional and quantum security in a single solution allows Senetas customers to start their transition to a quantum-safe future.
See original here:
World first Australian solution to protect sensitive data from Quantum threat - Industry Update Manufacturing Media
Rewind 2020: Business, politics, social and professional impact, and what lies ahead – YourStory
In this year-end article, we look at the broad array of changes witnessed in 2020, transformative forces, and future trends for 2021 and beyond.
Some of the obvious developments for the year 2020 were offline or in-person meetings being replaced by virtual meetings, and travel and tourism being replaced by OTT and online binging. Office space was replaced by work from home.
Polluted air was replaced by cleaner air. Budget allocations for defence were reduced and budget allocations to stimulate the economy were increased. Going to schools and colleges was replaced by online classes or your teachers were replaced by teachers from anywhere. The swanky stores and fancy malls were replaced by online sales.
The most important change was that the GDP or the type of governance or the climate that a country had did not matter this is what I call a level playing field for the world.
All the above changes were across all countries, across all continents, across all levels of the society. It did not matter if you were developed or not, it did not matter if you had a medical infrastructure better than the others, it did not matter if you were in the tropics or not, it did not matter if you were rich or poor, and so on so forth.
The underlying impact of all of this will be short term and long term, is great or will be greater. For example, corporates are questioning the need to travel or to have office space in swanky zip codes. Parents are questioning the high school or college fees that they have to pay.
Governments are realising the importance of the impact of sporadic growth on the environment. They are questioning if chemical warfare is the future or not, especially when one country cant stay in isolation from the other.
The country that rules the tech space will rule the world, will be the future economic power.
Whilst all of the above developments were happening on the ground, there were huge enhancements in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Blockchain, facial recognition software, quantum computing, data storage, wearable devices and adoption of 5G.
All of this combined will pave the future of the world that we live in. Based upon the above context, this is what I feel the coming year or two will be for all of us, or for the world at large.
The misuse of advancement in science and tech has also always had the negative impact on our future, form minor misuses on audio and video content distortion to the hacking of websites and passwords, to targeted warfare, I fear that the use of AI and ML by countries into social media or other digital means of communication can change the mindset of the society, a country or a generation gradually without them even realising it.
The predictive behaviour online of an individual or a group of individuals can be further directed into a more regimented/chaotic society by implanting the algorithms that one wants to, whether a political party or a country or a group of countries.
So, while we have to be careful on the use of or influence of online behaviour, especially social media, we also need to be careful of the fact that the countries will not trust other countries.
Land records and legal documents will be more authentic and safer. Tokenisation of investment in shares or equity, in land and property, and other assets will also revolutionise the world. Tokenisation will democratise investments across all sectors of investments. And many such things will be much more secure and easy to transact.
But will this lead to a new currency, an e-currency for every country and a new world order which will cashless and corrupt free? Would the countries or individuals that lose because of all this, let that happen? Not in 2021 or 2022, but we shall soon know of this too.
While life becomes smaller and easier, our memories would fade, as we will be more dependent on devices, our abilities to be human will gradually diminish, more knowledge will be imparted to us than we need or can digest. The speed of growth of the human race will be enhanced multifold, meaning thereby what has changed in the last decades will take years to change. Good or bad is for all of us to see and live.
Furthermore, in my opinion, here are a few things that hopefully will not change or will make a strong comeback.
(Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of YourStory.)
Read the original here:
Rewind 2020: Business, politics, social and professional impact, and what lies ahead - YourStory
As China Leads Quantum Computing Race, U.S. Spies Plan for a World with Fewer Secrets – Newsweek
Back in 1994, when quantum computers existed only as so much chalk on a blackboard, mathematician Peter Shor invented what may soon prove to be their killer app.
Shor trained his efforts on a calculation called "factoring," which ordinarily nobody but a mathematician would care about, except it just happens to be an Achilles heel of the internet. If someone were to invent a computer that could perform this operation quickly, messages that are currently hidden from hackers, terrorists, military adversaries, governments and competitors would be as easy to read as a Stephen King novel.
Shor, of course, didn't have such a computer. He was writing an algorithm, or program, for a hypothetical machine that might one day exploit the weird properties of atoms and subatomic particles, as described by the theory of quantum mechanics, to perform calculations that conventional computers could only solve in yearsmaybe hundreds of years, or millions, or more time than the universe is expected to last. Too long, at any rate, to be useful in cracking open an email. Shor's algorithm was a theoretical exercise. "The question of whether using quantum mechanics in a computer allows one to obtain more computational power," he wrote in his 1994 paper, "has not yet been satisfactorily answered."
The answers are now coming in.
Last year a team from Google achieved what it called "quantum supremacy" when its quantum computer performed a calculation faster than a conventional computer could. "Our machine performed the target computation in 200 seconds, and from measurements in our experiment we determined that it would take the world's fastest supercomputer 10,000 years to produce a similar output," wrote Google's John Martinis and Sergio Boixo in a blog post. And earlier this month, a team under the direction of Pan Jianwei at the University of Science and Technology in China (USTC), in the journal Science, said its quantum computer succeeded in performing a calculation 100 trillion times faster than a conventional computer couldsurpassing Google's achievement by a factor of 10 billion, according to the Xinhua.
Start your day with our top 5 articles
These two announcements were mere demonstrations, using prototype machines in the lab to perform calculations that are not useful in any practical sense. Nobody is ready to put Shor's algorithm into practice. But tens of billions of dollars are being invested in a broad-scale effort to make it possible. Dozens of engineering teams, from big companies like Google, IBM and Amazon to universities and startups, are racing to build a full-scale working quantum computer. China is reportedly spending $10 billion on the effort, building a center devoted to quantum computing and artificial intelligence; the U.S. government has committed $1 billion; and corporate and military budgets likely hold many millions morefor instance, Google and IBM are each thought to have spent in excess of $100 million.
These groups are in pursuit not merely of faster computers but a fundamentally different approach to computing, which would open up new vistas in technology and society. Quantum computers could be as transformational as the microchip, which ushered in the internet age and all the attendant effects on the economy and politics. For instance, the vast computational possibilities of quantum technology would turbo-charge artificial intelligence in ways that are difficult to fathom. It's no accident that China's new technology center will combine the two fields.
China's ambition in quantum technology has caused something of a Sputnik moment in the U.S., nearly as ominous as the Russian satellite in 1957 that kicked off the race to the moon. It wasn't long ago that Chinese engineers were perceived as copycats. That is no longer the case. The long-term worry is that the U.S. loses its technological edge. While China embraces ambitious technology programs, the U.S. has in recent years retreated into a reactive mode, with diminishing budgets for science. Back in the 1960s, the federal government accounted for about two-thirds of R&D spending in the U.S., the rest coming mainly from the private sector. But its role has diminished, says Paul Scharre, director of technology and national security at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) and author of Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. "Basically the federal government has taken its foot off of the gas pedal in terms of innovation in the U.S.," he says. "While we're doing so, other nations like China caught up."
What tends to focus the mind are the security implications in the near term. When quantum computers go live, what will happen to all our secrets? Will we wake up one day and find that China has been reading our mail? The NSA and other intelligence agencies are already preparing for a world where all their secrets are vulnerable. Shor's algorithm, once a fanciful conjecture, is beginning to look like a threat. The question is, is the threat imminent?
The meaning of "Quantum Supremacy"
John Martinis got involved in quantum computers back in the 1980s, "before the word 'qubit' was even invented," he says.
A qubit is the fundamental unit of information in a quantum computerthe analogue to a "bit" in conventional computers, but with some important differences. A bit can be either a zero or a one; a qubit can be both numbers at once, and everything in betweena property known as superposition. A bit exists as a tiny pocket of electrical charge in a silicon chip, which classical computers shuffle around like checkers to perform mathematical operations; a qubit is a single atom or subatomic particle, which stores information in a peculiar statistical fashion according to laws of quantum mechanics that are wholly beyond our experience in the macroscopic world. A bit is a discrete unit of information; a qubit is part of a collective, "entangled" with other qubits by a phenomenon that Albert Einstein described as "spooky action at a distance."
In his early work at the University of California at Santa Barbara, Martinis began by asking basic questions about how to get information out of things as small as atoms and photons, or particles of light. But dealing with single atoms and particles pushes engineering to extreme levels of precision, as Martinis found early on. How do you protect these tiny particles but also allow them to interact with others in such a way that the computer can perform a useful calculation? In other words, how do you harness the qualities of superposition and entanglement to perform a task, such as factoring a large number for the purpose of reading an encrypted message? "You have to isolate qubits to keep them coherent," he says, "but if you isolate them super well, they can't talk to other qubits to do computation."
Martinis' spent years trying to strike this balance, experimenting with different materials and setups, then turned to the task of getting qubits to work together in a computer. Eventually he found his way to Google, where he began work on what became Sycamore, the quantum computer used in last year's demonstration. Sycamore's 54 qubits are kept in a chamber at Google's lab in Goleta, California cooled to within one degree of absolute zero, the lowest temperature possiblemore than 500 degrees F below zero. The machine is "programmed" by beaming faint microwaves into the chamber, which stimulate the qubits.
A big issue that Martinis and every other quantum engineer struggles with is how to keep the qubits intact long enough to perform a calculation. Superpositionthe ability of qubits to be both a zero and a one at the same timeis an essential part of the machine's operation. The slightest disturbance, however, can cause a qubit to collapse into a one or a zero, bringing down the whole delicate entangled constellation of qubits with it. Even cooled at extreme temperatures, the qubits have an annoying tendency to dissipate so quickly that many calculations result in errors. Making a quantum computer is difficult enough; making one that is not riddled with errors has so far proved beyond the reach of the engineers.
"You would like qubits to maintain their superposition of a zero and a one and maintain entangled states even while you're doing operations on them," says Scott Aaronson, a computer science professor at the University of Texas at Austin who collaborates with Google and other quantum engineers. "The problem is they're inherently very fragile. As soon as information leaks into the environment about whether a qubit is a zero or a one, the whole thing collapses. This 'noisiness' is the fundamental problem in building a quantum computer. This is what makes it hard."
Coming up with a way to test Google's and USTC's machines was a difficult problem in itself. To do so required overcoming a conundrum: If you ask your quantum computer to solve a problem that no conventional computer can accomplish in a reasonable amount of time, how do you check the results? The simplest way would be to use Shor's algorithm on an encrypted message; if you can read the message, you know your computer works. But Shor's algorithm was too difficult for the baby quantum computers of the day to handle.
Back in 2011, Aaronson and his graduate students came up with the idea of "boson sampling," which involves predicting how particles like photons will behave when they bounce around obstacles. It's a tough problem for classical computers because it involves lots of calculations about quantum mechanics; but since quantum computers live in that realm, the calculation should be a doddle. Aaronson not only came up with the experiment but also, crucially, with a way of checking the results statistically without having to solve the problems with a classical computerwhich, of course, by the definition of "quantum supremacy," should be impossible.
Both Google and USTC wound up adapting Aaronson's approach to their specific machines. Pan Jianwei and his colleagues at USTC, in fact, built Jiuzhang literally as a machine for boson samplingusing photons, a type of boson, as qubits. They sent photons, in the form of laser beams, pinging and ponging through a course of mirrors and other obstacles. The setup wasn't meant to be a general-purpose computer that could be programmed to perform different tasks but to do one thing only: demonstrate that a machine made of photons could perform a calculation of how photons behave when they move through an obstacle course.
The USTC experiment accomplished more than this tautological description captures, of course. It demonstrated that photons could be controlled and used to produce a computational result. Still, engineers have critiqued Jiuzhang on the grounds that it was built for such a narrow purpose. They've also tried to show that a classical computer could achieve the same result in a reasonable amount of time, a task known in vernacular as "spoofing." "The situation is evolving rapidly, from day to day, as people try to knock down the new result by showing how to spoof the outputs classically," said Aaronson in an email. "We don't know yet how well they're going to succeed. Debates about whether, and in what sense, the USTC group achieved quantum supremacy are likely to continue for quite some time."
Google's Sycamore test also made big headlines, and it also caught some flak in technical circles. IBM engineers, who are working on their own quantum computer, insisted that it's possible in theory to spoof Sycamore with a supercomputer, provided it were equipped with tremendous amounts of memory."They said, 'it only took us two seconds, but it would take a crippled supercomputer 10,000 years'," said Robert Sutor, a mathematician and vice president at IBM Research. "Why are you crippling it? Why would you remove part of its functionality and then say how wonderful you are?"
Many engineers look at the quantum supremacy demonstration more as milestones than a significant developments in their own right. Both Sycamore and Jiuzhang were impressive accomplishments; both are a long way from doing anything remotely useful, claims of "supremacy" to the contrary. "I don't think that quantum supremacy is completely a done deal," says Aaronson. "I would like to see quantum supremacy for some problem where we can actually easily recognize the answer."
To get a quantum computer capable of doing interesting things, engineers will need to figure out how to correct the errors and scale the machines up to thousands of qubits, and perhaps millions. The first practical applications are likely to be in simulating things that involve quantum mechanics, like chemistry, which could have an impact in drug development.
"Shor's algorithm, breaking cryptographic codes, is one of those things that will happen in the evolution of quantum computers," says Aaronson. "But by the time you can do that, you can pretty much do any quantum computation. It would surprise me a lot if it was in the next decade."
So why worry?
After the Sycamore demonstration in 2019, Martinis and Google had a parting of ways. "It was time for me to leave," he says. In the fall, Martinis joined Michelle Simmons, an old acquaintance who had formed Silicon Quantum Computing, a start-up in Sydney, Australia. Simmons' company is making qubits out of phosphorous and silicon, which tend to be more stable than other materials, she says, and that means they may not require so much error-correcting.
"Working at Google was great because we had the resources to solve tough problems," says Martinis. "On the other hand, what's great right now is there's an ecosystem where you have the companies, the startups and university groups where people can solve problems. I think that's better in the end."
Martinis, though, is under no illusion that a thousand quantum flowers will bloom. The field is crowded now, but that won't last forever. "All these people have a lot of optimism, but when they go to do the systems engineering, they're going to find that their ideas might not work so well." Out of the dozen or so projects underway now, he says, "it's a question whether one or two could work. Building a quantum computer is really hard, harder than you think."
The resources required to pull off a quantum computer would seem to favor the Googles and the IBMs of the worldand China. Google's Hartmut Neven, head of its quantum computing effort, told a gathering of the Center for Strategic and International Studies earlier this year that building an error correcting quantum computer would cost more than $3 billion.
Google is currently committed to seeing the project through and has the cash to do so, but a change in corporate priorities could put such a long-term effort at risk. "What would really secure American leadership," said Neven, "is if the government would use its enormous purchasing power to reward early risk takers."Regardless of whatever shortcomings Jiazhang may have, it clearly demonstrates that China is a formidable innovator. Neven issued a grim warning about the danger of the U.S. being beaten in the race to develop a quantum computer. "We are indeed most worried [about] an as of yet unknown competitor [from] China [who will] beat us to the race to an error-correcting machine, because China has the ability to steer enormous resources in a direction that's deemed strategically important."
While China's ambitions have grown, the technology aims of the U.S. seem diminished. "There is a mentality of complacency," says Elsa Kania, a china expert at CNAS. "There's a sense and an ideological commitment to the notion that the market can do it all, that there's no role for government, and a backlash against investments in science and education. Even if China was doing nothing in quantum science, we should be investing a lot in the basic research, trying to fund some of these new programs, and trying to build up the pipeline of talent."
How much the U.S. is spending on quantum computing research is difficult to say. Although the government's share of total R&D spending is lower than it used to be, "when you include U.S. private companies, we still outpace pretty much everyone in the world," says Todd Harrison, director of defense budget analysis at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Corporate research doesn't include much basic R&D, which is what typically yields the biggest long-term payoffs. The military, which in the past has sowed world-changing technologies like the internet, could wind up playing a crucial role in quantum computing. Funding for unclassified military R&D has in general remained steady, according to Harrison. The Pentagon is probably also funding classified quantum computer research. Documents from the Edward Snowden cache revealed that the National Security Agency was spending about $80 million on a "cryptographically useful quantum computer," the Washington Post reported, all of it classified.
Getting ready
Even though the quantum computers themselves seem far off, it's not too soon to start worrying about keeping secrets from prying eyes. The prospect of a code-breaking machine emerging sometime in the next decade is already setting off alarm bells in some quarters.
The National Security Agency and other intelligence organizations are thought to be scooping up reams of encrypted information in anticipation of a day in the not-too-distant future when they can decode them with a quantum computer. And they are also beginning to worry about the day when their adversaries can decipher their collected secrets, Wetoo. In the U.S., plans are afoot to introduce new encryption methods that cannot be broken even by a quantum computer. The NSA announced in 2015 that it intended to switch eventually to an alternative, quantum-resistant scheme, as yet undetermined. "It is now clear that the current Internet security measures and the cryptography behind them will not withstand the new computational capabilities that quantum computers will bring," an NSA spokesperson told Quanta's Natalie Wolchover.
A year later, the National Institutes of Standards and Technology announced a technical competition for standards of quantum-resistant encryption. This fall, NIST narrowed a field of 69 contenders to 15. The most popular scheme, it turns out, is "lattice-based encryption," which would require a computer to find a specific route through grids of billions of numbers an entirely different mathematical basis than that of current public-key encryption schemes, which rely on factoring large numbers.
Persuading government agencies and other organizations to migrate from the current public-key encryption schemes to new ones won't be easy. If the threat is not clear and present, complacency can set it. "People are still using web browsers with encryption that was broken in the nineties," says Aaronson. "It's sad."
Correction: 12/14/2020 5:16 pm ET: This article was modified to indicate that Silicon Quantum Computing's quantum computer does in fact require cryogenic equipment.
Read the rest here:
As China Leads Quantum Computing Race, U.S. Spies Plan for a World with Fewer Secrets - Newsweek
Chinese quantum computer may be the most powerful ever seen – Siliconrepublic.com
This week in future tech, a Chinese quantum computer can reportedly solve a problem in 200 seconds, compared to the 2.5bn years a supercomputer needs.
A quantum computer developed at the University of Science and Technology in Hefei, China, has caught the worlds attention due to what appears to be a performance vastly exceeding others that exist today.
According to findings in published in Scienceand reported by Nature, researchers claim they demonstrated a quantum advantage, using laser beams to perform a computation that is not mathematically possible using traditional binary computers.
We have shown that we can use photons, the fundamental unit of light, to demonstrate quantum computational power well beyond the classical counterpart, said researcher Jian-Wei Pan.
Tasked with solving the so-called boson sampling problem, the researchers found solutions in as little as 200 seconds. By comparison, it could take Chinas TaihuLight supercomputer about 2.5bn years to do the same.
However, Christian Weedbrook, chief executive of quantum-computing start-up Xanadu, said that unlike Googles Sycamore quantum computer announced last year, the Chinese quantum computer is not programmable. This means that, so far, it cannot be used for solving practical problems.
Scientists from the University of Washington have unveiled a drone that smells, using the power of a moth. Writing in IOP Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, they revealed their Smellicopter design.
The autonomous drone uses a live antenna from a moth to navigate toward smells, while also having the ability to sense and avoid obstacles. A moth uses its antennae to sense chemicals in its environment and navigate toward sources of food or potential mates.
In this case, the researchers used antennae from the Manduca sexta hawkmoth for Smellicopter. The moths were placed in a fridge to anaesthetise them before removing their antennae. Once separated, the live moth antennae could stay chemically active for four hours.
By adding tiny wires into either end of the antenna, the researchers were able to connect it to an electrical circuit and measure the average signal from all of the cells in the antenna. They said Smellicopter could be used to detect things such as gas leaks, explosives and disaster survivors.
From a robotics perspective, this is genius, said Sawyer Fuller of the University of Washington. The classic approach in robotics is to add more sensors, and maybe build a fancy algorithm or use machine learning to estimate wind direction. It turns out, all you need is to add a fin.
German air taxi firm Volocopter said it plans to make regular services a reality in Singapore within the next three years. In October 2019, Volocopter completed the its first air taxi demonstration flight over the Marina Bay area of Singapore and the company is now looking to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for regular service, including those from Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore and the European Union Aviation Safety.
The first route is expected to be a touristic route over the southern waters, offering views of the Marina Bay skyline, and future routes may include cross-border flights. The company is expected to hire over 200 full-time employees in Singapore to manage a network of routes by 2026.
The citys research institutes conducting R&D play an integral part in this, said Florian Reuter, CEO of Volocopter. Topics like route validation for autonomous operations, material science and research regarding battery technology are very important for our long-term business success.
The Global Mobile Suppliers Association (GSA) has reported that the number of announced 5G devices has surpassed 500 for the first time. By the end of November this year, there were 519 announced 5G devices, of which 303 were commercially available.
In the last three months, the number of announced 5G devices has grown by 29.4pc, while there has been a 59.5pc increase in the number of commercially available 5G devices over the same period.
This year weve seen more and more symbolically important milestones being passed over 500 announced 5G devices, more than 100 vendors, over 250 different phones, and 100 fixed wireless access CPE devices, said Joe Barrett, president of the GSA.
And it doesnt stop there; we expect more 5G devices to become commercially available, surpassing the 330 mark before the year is out. The device vendor community has stepped up and delivered in the face of unprecedented challenges. As an industry, we can be excited about the opportunities 2021 will bring.
Want stories like this and more direct to your inbox? Sign up for Tech Trends, Silicon Republics weekly digest of need-to-know tech news.
Read this article:
Chinese quantum computer may be the most powerful ever seen - Siliconrepublic.com
Anyon Systems to Deliver a Quantum Computer to the Canadian Department of National Defense – GlobeNewswire
Anyon Systems's Quantum Computer
Anyon System's superconducting quantum processor.
MONTREAL, Dec. 15, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Anyon Systems Inc. (Anyon), a quantum computing company based in Montreal, Canada, announced today that it is to deliver Canadas first gate-based quantum computer for the Department of National Defenses Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC). The quantum computer will feature Anyons Yukon generation superconducting quantum processor. Named after Canadas westernmost territory, the quantum computer will enable DRDC researchers to explore quantum computing to solve problems of interest to their mission.
Quantum computing is expected to be a disruptive technology and is of strategic importance to many industries and government agencies. Anyon is focused on delivering large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computers to a wide group of early adopters including government agencies, high performance computing centers and universities in the near term, said Dr. Alireza Yazdi, founder and CEO of Anyon.
About Anyon Systems
Founded in 2014, Anyon Systems is the first Canadian company manufacturing gate-based quantum computing platform for universal quantum computation. Anyon Systems delivers turnkey gate-based quantum computers. The company is headquartered in Montreal, Quebec.
Media Contact:media@anyonsys.com
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7c776a6e-2ef8-4875-b33a-06c3ccf9f8df
Go here to read the rest:
Anyon Systems to Deliver a Quantum Computer to the Canadian Department of National Defense - GlobeNewswire
Show Your Work: D-Wave Opens the Door to Performance Comparisons Between Quantum Computing Architectures – HPCwire
BURNABY, British Columbia, Dec. 9, 2020 D-Wave Systems Inc., a leader in quantum computing systems, software, and services, has launched a first-of-its-kind cross-system software tool providing interoperability between quantum annealing and gate model quantum computers. The open-source plugin allows developers to easily map quadratic optimization inputs in IBMs Qiskit format onto D-Waves quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) format and solve the same input on any quantum system supported in Qiskit. The code is available for free as a stand-alone packagein GitHub and marks a major industry milestone: the ability to use, test, solve and compare real applications with both gate-model and annealing quantum computers. For the first time, developers and forward-thinking businesses can have a real assessment of the benefits of different systems on their applications.
Interoperability is a critical step in the maturation of transformative technologies. Until now, there hasnt been a convenient way to send the same problems to solvers on both gate and D-Wave systems, or to obtain head-to-head comparisons of results from the two different quantum computing systems. Before today,using a different quantum computing vendors hardware and software required significant investment to familiarize developers with code, solvers, and SDKs.
D-Waves industry-first open-source package removes those barriers.Qiskit users can nowsubmit Ising Hamiltoniansto the D-Wave quantum computer, in addition to any gate model system Qiskit supports.Now, cross-paradigm transparency and comparison will give quantum developers the flexibility to try different systems, while providing businesses with key insights into performance so they can identify, build, and scale quantum applications.
The company also called for users to publish their work.
In order for the quantum computing ecosystem to fully mature, the developer and business communities alike need access to diverse quantum systems and the ability to compare cross-architectural performance, said Alan Baratz, CEO, D-Wave. The next few years will bring a proliferation of quantum applications, and companies must be able to make informed decisions about their quantum computing investment and initiatives to stay competitive. Weve moved beyond measures that explore does the system work? Instead, enterprises want to benchmark which systems add the most value to their businesses. Were opening the door to this and we encourage users of the tool to share their work and publish their results.
The news is in line with D-Waves ongoing mission to provide practical quantum computing via access to the most powerful quantum hardware, software, and tools. In 2018, D-Wave brought theLeap quantum cloud service and open-source Ocean SDK to market. In February 2020, Leap expanded to include new hybrid solver services to solve real-world, business-sized problems. At the end of September, D-Wave made available the Advantage quantum system, with more than 5000 qubits, 15-way qubit connectivity, and expanded hybrid solver services that can run problems with up to one million variables. The combination of the computing power of Advantage and the scale to address real-world problems with the hybrid solver services in Leap enables businesses to run performant, real-time, hybrid quantum applications for the first time. And with the new cross-system software tool, now users can benchmark their applications across annealing and gate model systems, to further understand and benefit from performance comparisons.
To download and install the cross-paradigm integration plugin for free, clickhere.
As part of its commitment to enabling businesses to build in-production quantum applications, the company also introducedD-Wave Launch, a jump-start program for businesses who want to get started building hybrid quantum applications today but may need additional support.
About D-Wave Systems Inc.
D-Wave is a leader in the development and delivery of quantum computing systems, software and services and is the worlds first commercial supplier of quantum computers. Our mission is to unlock the power of quantum computing for the world. We do this by delivering customer value with practical quantum applications for problems as diverse as logistics, artificial intelligence, materials sciences, drug discovery, cybersecurity, fault detection, and financial modeling. D-Waves systems are being used by some of the worlds most advanced organizations, including NEC, Volkswagen, DENSO, Lockheed Martin, USC, and Los Alamos National Laboratory. With headquarters near Vancouver, Canada, D-Waves US operations are based in Palo Alto, CA and Bellevue, WA. D-Wave has a blue-chip investor base including PSP Investments, Goldman Sachs, BDC Capital, NEC Corp., and In-Q-Tel. For more information, visit: http://www.dwavesys.com.
Source: D-Wave Systems Inc.
Read more here:
Show Your Work: D-Wave Opens the Door to Performance Comparisons Between Quantum Computing Architectures - HPCwire