Page 2,230«..1020..2,2292,2302,2312,232..2,2402,250..»

Spouses, Colleagues and Business Partners | University of Arkansas – University of Arkansas Newswire

Photos by Russell Cothren, University Relations

Xianghong Qian and Ranil Wickramasinghe.

Xianghong Qian and Ranil Wickramasinghe first met in 1991 through a mutual friend and classmate, respectively. At the time, Wickramasinghe was earning his Ph.D. in chemical engineering at the University of Minnesota, and Qian was earning her Ph.D. in physical and theoretical chemistry at George Washington University. They hit it off and married in 1996, while still residing in separate states. It wasn't until 2000 that they finally resided in the same city at the same time fully nine years after they met and four after they married.

This illustrates the challenging life of the itinerant academic in pursuit of the next degree, the next postdoctoral opportunity, the next academic appointment. It's all the more challenging for immigrants far from home, who lack the family support, social network and professional contacts an American-born academic may have.

While the couple found a home at Colorado State University for several years, it wasn't until 2011, when Wickramasinghe became one of the first two Arkansas Research Alliance Scholars, that they really found a lasting home in Fayetteville, Arkansas.

Wickramasinghe was named the Ross E. Martin Chair in Emerging Technologies in the Department of Chemical Engineering while Qian was awarded the Robert E. Babcock Sr. Professorship in Chemical Engineering, though she moved to the biomedical engineering department two years later. She noted that both spouses in the same department can be limiting, "because people can see you as one entity, not as separate entities, so that can make you feel not as relevant." By moving to biomedical engineering, Qian was able to forge her own professional identity.

And that was when the couple's professional collaboration truly kicked into high gear. Their catalytic membrane reactor for biomass conversion to biofuel was funded by the National Science Foundation in 2013. They filed their first patent in 2015, with five more coming since then (only one, filed last year, is still pending). They have also published roughly 60 papers together, mostly in the last 10 years, and founded a company based on their research, SIEV Technologies. While both still have separate research interests, now and in the past, the primary focus of their work together is in membrane science and engineering.

Wickramasinghe is the executive director of the Membrane, Science, Engineering and Technology Center, a cooperative research center currently consisting of four affiliate universities. Broadly stated, his research focuses on synthetic membrane-based separation processes for purification of pharmaceuticals and biopharmaceuticals, the treatment and reuse of water, and for the production of biofuels.

Wickramasinghe noted that when he was a doctoral student, he had an adviser that he "got on very well with. He was quite a unique character at the university. The first project was very interesting because it was on designing blood oxygenators for open heart surgery."

From there Wickramasinghe worked in private industry for five years, designing membranes with biomedical applications. Once he moved to Colorado State University, his work took a more environmental turn, including better ways to recycle and reuse water as well as the design of catalytic membranes to convert waste biomass into bio-based products.

It took Qian a little longer to get into membrane research, mostly focusing on it since her arrival in Arkansas, though when she was in Colorado she spent some time working on biomass conversion at the Nation Renewable Energy Lab in Golden. She is an expert at using computational chemistry methods, including discovery of a new catalyst that can convert biomass to sugars that are then fermented into biofuel. More recently, she has studied purification methods for biopharmaceuticals. In particular, Qian is developing cost-effective methods to recover and purify virus particles for applications in gene therapy and viral vaccines. This work has the potential to reduce the cost and time required to bring these emerging therapeutics to the market. She is also a site co-director of the MAST Center, along with Wickramasinghe.

Andrew Zydney, a chemical engineering professor at Pennsylvania State University, recently joined the MAST Center as PSU's site director. "I was particularly impressed with the work that Ranil and Xianghong had done to increase the scope of the center by adding several biopharmaceutical companies to the Industry Advisory Board," Zydney explained. "My own research is focused on the applications of membranes in bioprocessing, so the opportunity to join the center, and to collaborate on projects with Ranil and Xianghong, was very exciting. Joining the MAST Center has been a great experience, and Ranil's leadership has been absolutely critical to the center's success."

In the simplest terms, Qian focuses on catalyst design while Wickramasinghe focuses on membrane separation. After being mixed with a catalyzing agent, biomass, like corn fiber, is broken down in a reactor, and then pushed through a membrane, separating out the biofuel. Their goal is to identify the best catalyzing agent as well as the best membrane design. The membranes (see photo) are actually ceramic tubes made of silicon oxide, and can be bundled together as needed to increase output.

That's the underlying research behind SIEV Technologies, a catalytic membrane reactor design company founded by the researchers in 2020. Last year, the fledging company was awarded a $256,000 Small Business Innovation Research Grant from the National Science Foundation to further develop technology that improves biofuel production. The grant will enable SIEV to continue developing its business model as well as its technology. SIEV will initially focus on ethanol production. While there are only around 200 ethanol production plants in the country, Wickramasinghe described it as "a beachhead market, representing the shortest path to commercialization for the company."

David Hurley, an engineer with SIEV, moved to Fayetteville from southern Ohio. He said that when he was considering the job, he was looking at a number of positions across the country and didn't want to take the first job offer. His decision would be based on three things he thought were important: "The job needed technology that seemed viable; it needed what were clearly highly renowned experts in their field, and it needed the right team." Hurley felt the first two were in place, but the third was still coming together. But what finally sold him was "I heard one of them say 'y'all' and thought, 'I'm not going to be judged for my accent if I go there.'" He signed on in September of 2021.

With so many mutual interests, it can be a challenge to separate work from home, especially when they may have spent the day in different labs, working on problems of mutual interest. One thing they like to do is take trips that are not work related. They also have a son, Aroshe, who has enabled Qian to slow down and delve deeper into U.S. culture as Aroshe has grown into an American teenager.

While the couple have settled into Northwest Arkansas the longest they have lived anywhere in the U.S. being immigrants can still be challenging. Wickramasinghe was born in Sri Lanka, but grew up in Melbourne, Australia, where his father, who was a surgeon, did his residency. Qian was born and raised in Wuxi, China. All of their parents still live in their home countries, though they are all around the age of 90, which makes their ability to travel to the U.S. more difficult. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a family vacation might involve Wickramasinghe taking Aroshe to Australia for a visit, then flying to China to meetup up with Qian and her family. Needless to say, pandemic has made getting around more difficult, especially for a couple who enjoy travel.

Ultimately, the couple see themselves as having different but complementary strengths. Qian is the theoretical thinker, Wickramasinghe the practical engineer, picking out the most workable ideas. Qian explains, "As a theoretician, I like brainstorming ideas. Sometimes when I am talking out loud, I don't even think about trying to do something. But I can remember a lot of things Ranil actually put into plans. He's very good at execution."

Ranil Wickramasinghe, left, and Xianghong Qian hold ceramic membranes,tubes made of silicon oxide.

See more here:

Spouses, Colleagues and Business Partners | University of Arkansas - University of Arkansas Newswire

Read More..

Engineering the Sound: synthy space travel with Genki Cosmos – Happy Mag

Genki is an Icelandic company that does things a little differently. Take the Ring for example: a MIDI controller that you wear and use to modulate MIDI expression with your movements. And while the new Cosmos is a slightly more conventional soft synth, it still thinks outside the box.

Presenting a fresh single-screen interface, Cosmos is a pleasure to drink in visually. But its sound and intuitive workflow truly set it apart. Engineering the Sound investigates.

An eight-voice synth, the sonic possibilities are expansive. But Genki being Genki, ease-of-use and a spirit of playfulness is front and centre.

Synth heads will find sound crafting tools that are instantly familiar: an arpeggiator with octave and rate controls (though you can also sync it to your project); an oscillator with frequency, tone, sub, and noise parameters; two ADSR envelopes and two LFOs (both of which can be linked to other components within the synths architecture). Theres also a filter and ambient effects.

On paper, it all sounds rather textbook, but the beauty of Cosmos is in the workflow. Parameters are gracefully spread across a beautiful, single-screen interface. But as with all great design, intuitive functionality is intrinsic.

The sliders are colour-coded and shaped according to the cosmic theme. Arcs, orbits, and galactic swirls abound, all of which are incredibly easy to identify. And with MIDI learn available for all controls, its every bit the hands-on experience.

For all the details, head over to the Genki website.

Continue reading here:

Engineering the Sound: synthy space travel with Genki Cosmos - Happy Mag

Read More..

Off-White collaborated with teenage engineering to design a collection of clothing items that honor Virgil Abl – Yanko Design

Born from a collaboration between Off-White and teenage engineering, the Capsule Collection is a line of clothing items as well as an orange, transparent shoulder bag that is custom-fitted to store teenage engineerings OB4 loudspeaker.

Swedish consumer electronics company and manufacturer teenage engineering is known for its extensive catalog of electronics and synthesizers, including its core product the OP1 as well as instant cameras. One of their more recent electronic loudspeakers, the OB4, is a portable, hi-fi loudspeaker that memorizes everything you play on an endless loop. In a recent project with Off White that honors our collaboration with late friend and partner, Virgil Abloh, the duo designed a collection of clothing items that range from a shirt and hoodie to cargo pants and a carry bag made specifically to store OB4 loudspeaker.

Designers: Off-White x teenage engineering

Dubbed the Capsule Collection, teenage engineering describes the collaboration, Designed by Off-White exclusively for our collaboration, the collection includes a transparent orange carry bag for OB4, t-shirt, hoodie, and a multipocketed white bomber jacket and cargo pant setfeaturing custom pockets to fit teenage engineering devices. Strewn all over the bomber jackets arms and midsection, custom-fitted pockets provide ample storage for everyday items as well as teenage engineering electronic products, like instant cameras and synthesizers.

While the bomber jacket is currently sold out on teenage engineerings website, the other pieces of Capsule Collection are still available and feature custom-fitted pockets as well. The off-white cargo pants belong to the same set as the bomber jacket, featuring similarly sized pockets all over the pants front and sides. Then, the transparent vinyl orange shoulder bag is the perfect size to carry teenage engineerings OB4 loudspeaker.

Read more here:

Off-White collaborated with teenage engineering to design a collection of clothing items that honor Virgil Abl - Yanko Design

Read More..

The Experiment Podcast: An Engineer Tries to Build His Way Out of Tragedy – The Atlantic

Listen and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Stitcher | Google Podcasts

James Sulzer has always loved building things. As a rehabilitation engineer, he spent years creating devices that he hoped would help patients recover from serious brain trauma such as strokes. And he believed strongly in the potential of rehab technologythat with the right robot, he could relieve a whole array of brain injuries.

But then, one spring day in 2020, there was a horrible accident. And suddenly James had to apply everything he knew about science and rehabilitation to help fix his own family. The Atlantic senior editor Daniel Engber spent months talking to James, following him as he used his scientific knowledge to try to find meaning in tragedy.

Further reading: A Peer-Reviewed Portrait of Suffering

A transcript of this episode will soon be made available. Please check back.

Apply for The Experiments summer internship. Applications will be accepted through March 25, 2022.

Be part of The Experiment. Use the hashtag #TheExperimentPodcast, or write to us at theexperiment@theatlantic.com.

This episode was produced by Peter Bresnan with help from Julia Longoria and Alyssa Edes. Editing by Emily Botein. Reporting by Daniel Engber.

Fact-check by Yvonne Rolzhausen. Sound design by Joe Plourde. Transcription by Caleb Codding.

Here is the original post:

The Experiment Podcast: An Engineer Tries to Build His Way Out of Tragedy - The Atlantic

Read More..

Outlook on the Synthetic Biology: Protein Design and Engineering Global Market to 2035 – Industry Trends and Forecasts – Yahoo Finance

Company Logo

Dublin, March 16, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Synthetic Biology: Protein Design and Engineering Market by Type of Protein Engineering Approach Used, Type of Protein, Type of Application, Type of End User and Key Geographies: Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, 2022-2035" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

This report features an extensive study of the current market landscape and future potential of the protein design and engineering services and technology providers. The study features an in-depth analysis, highlighting the capabilities of protein design and engineering services and technology providers engaged in this domain.

Over the past few years, protein-based therapeutics, including peptides, hormones, vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, blood factors and therapeutic enzymes, have gained a lot of attention from clinical researchers engaged in the field of drug development. The success of these therapeutics can be attributed to the various clinical benefits offered by such products, such as high target specificity, low toxicity and favorable safety profiles. It is worth mentioning that, at present, the protein / peptide therapeutic pipeline features over 345 product candidates, which are being evaluated across more than 1,500 clinical trials worldwide. Further, over 55 such therapies have already been marketed to treat multiple therapeutic indications.

However, developing a protein based therapeutic is often fraught with several challenges, such as short half-life and poor chemical and physical stability. To overcome the aforementioned challenges as well as enable the development of therapeutic proteins with improved characteristics, researchers have identified various protein design and engineering techniques. Engineering a protein is a complex multistep process which requires high-throughput techniques and screening procedures. Additionally, it is a time and cost intensive process. Therefore, innovators in the pharmaceutical industry are constantly identifying / developing ways to improve the process of protein engineering.

Amidst other alternatives, outsourcing protein design and engineering process to a specialized service provider, having the required capability, has emerged as a viable option for various protein / peptide therapeutic developers. Presently, over 85 protein design / protein engineering service providers, along with technology providers, are actively supporting the development of novel protein / peptide therapeutics. The growing interest of pharmaceutical stakeholders in this field is also reflected from the recent rise in partnership activity related to protein design and engineering.

Story continues

Additionally, over 550 patents related to protein design and engineering techniques have been filed / granted in the past few years, demonstrating the continued innovation being carried out in this domain. Driven by the growing demand for therapeutic proteins for personalized medicine and advancement in protein engineering tools, this market is anticipated to witness steady growth in the coming years.Amongst other elements, the report features:

A detailed review of the overall landscape of companies offering protein design and engineering services to various organizations, including pharma / biotech firms, CROs and research / academic institutes, along with analysis based on various relevant parameters, such as year of establishment, company size (in terms of employee count) and location of headquarters. The chapter also provides details related to protein design and engineering service(s) offered (protein sequencing, protein library generation, protein screening, protein characterization, protein purification, de-novo protein synthesis and in-silico analysis), additional services offered (protein expression, drug discovery, protein-protein interaction analysis, protein identification, bio imaging of proteins, protein extraction and biological pathway identification), type of protein engineering approach used (directed evolution, rational designing and semi- rational designing), type of protein (antibodies, enzymes, peptides, vaccines and others), type of application (therapeutics and diagnostics) and type of protein expression (cell surface and cell free).

A competitiveness analysis of protein design and engineering service providers, segmented into three categories, namely small (1-50 employees), mid-sized (51-500 employees), and large companies (>500 employees). Within the peer group, companies were ranked based on various relevant parameters, such as supplier power (based on the experience) and company competitiveness (based on parameters, such as number of protein design and engineering services offered, type of technique used, type of protein engineering approach used, number of additional services offered, application areas and type of protein expression).

Elaborate profiles of key players that are engaged in offering services for protein design and engineering. Each profile features a brief overview of the company (including information on year of establishment, number of employees, location of headquarters and key executives), financial information (if available), information on services offered, recent developments and an informed future outlook.

A detailed assessment of the current market landscape of protein design and engineering technology providers, featuring analysis based on several parameters, such as year of establishment, company size (in terms of employee count) and location of headquarters. In addition, the chapter highlights an in-depth analysis of various protein design and engineering technologies based on type of protein design and engineering service(s) supported (protein sequencing, protein library generation, protein screening, protein characterization, de novo protein synthesis and in-silico analysis), additional services supported (drug discovery, protein-protein interaction analysis and protein expression), type of protein engineering approach used (rational designing, directed evolution and semi-rational designing), type of protein (proteins / peptides, antibodies, enzymes, cytokines and viruses) and type of application (therapeutics and diagnostics).

An insightful 22 matrix representation of the competitiveness analysis of various protein design and engineering technologies segregated into two peer groups based on the company size of their respective technology provider, namely small (1-50 employees) and mid-sized companies (51-500 employees). Within the peer group, technologies were ranked based on various relevant parameters, such as supplier power (based on the experience of the technology provider) and technology competitiveness (based on parameters, including number of protein design and engineering services supported, number of additional services supported, type of protein and type of application).

Elaborate profiles of key players that are engaged in offering technologies for protein design and engineering. Each profile features a brief overview of the company (including information on year of establishment, number of employees, location of headquarters and key executives), financial information (if available), information on technology offered, recent developments and an informed future outlook.

An analysis of the partnerships that have been inked by stakeholders engaged in this domain, during the period 2017-2021, covering R&D agreements, technology licensing agreements, product development and commercialization agreements, research agreements, service alliances, product development agreements, acquisitions / mergers, technology / software development agreements and other related agreements.

An in-depth analysis of over 130 protein / peptide based therapy developers that are likely to partner with protein design and engineering services and technology providers, based on several relevant parameters, such as developer strength (based on company size and its experience), pipeline strength (based on the number of drugs in pipeline and their stage of development and therapeutic area).

An in-depth analysis of over 550 patents filed / granted related to protein design and engineering, till 2021. The instances have been analyzed based on various relevant parameters, such as type of patent, application year, publication year, regional applicability, CPC symbols, emerging focus areas, type of applicant, leading patent assignees (in terms of number of patents filed / granted), patent benchmarking and valuation.

Key Questions Answered

Who are the leading players engaged in providing protein design and engineering services?

What is the relative competitiveness of different protein design and engineering service providers?

What are the popular types of protein design and engineering technologies available in the market?

What types of partnership models are commonly being adopted by stakeholders in this industry?

How is the intellectual property landscape in this field likely to evolve in the foreseen future?

Which are the most active clinical trial centers?

What are the major market trends and driving factors that are likely to impact the growth of protein design and engineering market?

How is the current and future market opportunity likely to be distributed across key market segments?

Key Topics Covered:

1. PREFACE

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3. INTRODUCTION

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE: PROTEIN DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICE PROVIDERS

5. PROTEIN DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICE PROVIDERS: COMPANY COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS

6. COMPANY PROFILES: PROTEIN DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN NORTH AMERICA6.1. Chapter Overview6.2. ATUM6.2.1. Company Overview6.2.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings6.2.3. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies6.2.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook6.3. Creative BioMart6.3.1. Company Overview6.3.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings6.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook6.4. Creative Biostructure6.4.1. Company Overview6.4.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings6.4.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook6.5. Creative Enzymes6.5.1. Company Overview6.5.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings6.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

7. COMPANY PROFILES: PROTEIN DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN EUROPE7.1. Chapter Overview7.1. Absolute Antibody7.1.1. Company Overview7.1.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings7.1.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook7.2. EUCODIS Bioscience7.2.1. Company Overview7.2.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings7.2.3. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies7.2.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook7.3. Fusion Antibodies7.3.1. Company Overview7.3.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings7.3.3. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies7.3.4. Financial Information7.3.5. Recent Developments and Future Outlook7.4. Innovagen7.4.1. Company Overview7.4.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings7.4.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook7.5. ZYMVOL7.5.1. Company Overview7.5.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings7.5.3. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies7.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

8. COMPANY PROFILES: PROTEIN DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN ASIA PACIFIC8.1. Chapter Overview8.2. Averring Biotech8.2.1. Company Overview8.2.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings8.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook8.3. EnzymeWorks8.3.1. Company Overview8.3.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings8.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook8.4. GeNext Genomics8.4.1. Company Overview8.4.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings8.4.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook8.5. Quantumzyme8.5.1. Company Overview8.5.2. Protein Design and Engineering Service Offerings8.5.3. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies8.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

9. MARKET LANDSCAPE: PROTEIN DESIGN AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROVIDERS

10. PROTEIN DESIGN AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES: COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS

11. COMPANY PROFILES: PROTEIN DESIGN AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROVIDERS11.1. Chapter Overview11.2. Arzeda11.2.1. Company Overview11.2.2. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies11.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook11.3. Cyrus Biotechnology11.3.1. Company Overview11.3.2. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies11.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook11.4. Enzymaster11.4.1. Company Overview11.4.2. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies11.4.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook11.5. Innovative Targeting Solutions11.5.1. Company Overview11.5.2. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies11.5.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook11.6. Proteus11.6.1. Company Overview11.6.2. Protein Design and Engineering Technologies11.6.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

12. PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATIONS

13. LIKELY PARTNERS ANALYSIS

14. PATENT ANALYSIS

15. CLINICAL TRIAL ANALYSIS

16. CASE STUDY: NOVEL PEPTIDE THERAPEUTICS

17. MARKET FORECAST AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS

18. CONCLUDING REMARKS

19. EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS

20. APPENDIX 1: TABULATED DATA

21. APPENDIX 2: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/6weam4

Read more:

Outlook on the Synthetic Biology: Protein Design and Engineering Global Market to 2035 - Industry Trends and Forecasts - Yahoo Finance

Read More..

Should engineering universities teach economics? – The Business Standard

Many public and private universities in Bangladesh offer science, technology, and engineering degrees at the undergraduate level. Buet, Cuet, Kuet, and Ruet are among the public universities that are solely dedicated to engineering degrees, which means no bachelor's degrees in economics, Social Science, or business education are offered at these institutions.

However, introducing a few degrees other than engineering at these universities can be very timely. At its very least, programmes like economics can add a lot of value to Buet and other engineering and technical universities.

In the subcontinent, modern engineering education started in the 1950s through establishing the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)s. Subsequently, Epuet and later Buet were established in Bangladesh in that continuity, and the other three BITs were set up. These BITs have now been upgraded to Cuet, Kuet, or Ruet.

Undergraduate-level economics programmes have been introduced in some of the IITs of India. For example, IIT Kanpur introduced a bachelor's degree in economics in 2005, and some IITs are currently offering PhD degrees in economics as well.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States is one of the most well-renowned educational institutions in the world. Although the name of this institution is associated with technology, it startedits economics department just after ten years of establishment in 1860.

Many world-famous educational institutions have names associated with technology, including GeorgiaTech, CalTech, where economics and other such subjects are also taught, besides engineering and technological subjects.

From our country's perspective, it may seem that only engineering, science, and mathematics should be taught at those mentioned universities of engineering and technologies, as their names suggest. And, teaching social science, economics, or business studies is not compatible with their name. But, what usually happens in the technical universities of developed countries is that many courses on science, mathematics, and statistics are found in the course curricula of social sciences. The opposite is also true for the course curricula of engineering degrees.

Many branches of the social sciences can be discussed, but especially the economics programme can be discussed in this discourse. The undergraduate programme in economics at good universities is usually designed in a way that those are equivalent to or not less than the equivalent of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) programmes. Many US universities now consider economics programmes as STEM.

Because of teaching engineering and other social science subjects at the same time in these institutions, the uniqueness of tutoring science and technology are not lost and no research suggests otherwise either. Instead, diversity is prioritised in education. For example, artificial intelligence (AI), which is a new invention in the current age of technology, engineers, scientists, economists, and psychologists are currently working together to find ways of associating AI. In addition, the kind of data or programming used in engineering can be applied to economics programmes as well.

Say engineering universities decide to introduce programmes like economics. In that case, questions may arise about how the admission process can be conducted. One such question is if a separate admission exam needs to be arranged in that case.

In developed countries, at the secondary/higher secondary levels, there are usually no significant distinction between science, arts or business education at those levels of education. So, no such problem shows in their case. However, the admission process of IITs in India may work in our case.

At present, IITs in India usually admit students at the undergraduate level through the Joint Entrance Exam (JEE). In all the IITs, where economics is currently being taught, the same test is taken for admission in both engineering and economics departments. It means that students are admitted only by taking exams in maths, statistics or science subjects for studying economics as aspiring students for engineering do.

These admitted students of IITs study physics, chemistry, mathematics, and some other basic engineering courses in their first year and in parts of the second. After successful completion of these courses, the students switch to real economics courses, such as microeconomics, macroeconomics, and its other branches, including econometrics.

Introducing a department like economics will naturally lead to a greater number of courses in economics, business, or social sciences - which can benefit engineering students alongside too. Students in the engineering department will be able to study more economics courses as elective subjects, making them more qualified in the job market.

On the other hand, the students from the economics programme can take some engineering courses as electives. The orientation of these courses can help the students do better in the future job market.

In the context of our country, after getting an engineering degree at the undergraduate level, many job seekers are getting employed in banking, insurance, business and corporate, or other public sector jobs. Moreover, many jobs are partly engineering and partly managerial or analytical in nature.

Furthermore, one has to get involved in managerial responsibilities at a certain stage of the engineering job. So, an extensive orientation of these subjects can make both groups of students good performers in their respective fields.

Lastly, some may raise the issue that many other universities in Bangladesh are teaching economics so that aspiring students can study in those universities. economics has become much more analytical and mathematical.

Now, it is even more challenging with the quick advancing nature of innovations these days. So, aspiring students of the country who are good at mathematics and science but may not have much interest in engineering itself can choose to study economics in engineering universities and that can bring good to the country.

Md Rashedur Rahman Sardar is a member of the Bangladesh Civil Service and is currently pursuing a PhD in economics at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro in the United States.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and views of The Business Standard.

See the article here:

Should engineering universities teach economics? - The Business Standard

Read More..

An asteroid is spotted 2 hours before it slams into the Earth at 11 miles per second – Interesting Engineering

It's such a rare occasion for astronomers to detect an asteroid before it impacts the Earth that only 4 asteroids had been spottedbefore they entered the Earth's atmosphere:2008 TC3, 2014 AA, 2018 LA, and 2019 MO. But now, it's been 5 with the discovery of 2022 EB5.

On March 11th, the astronomer Krisztin Srneczky observed a small rocky objectusing the Schmidt telescope at the Piszksteto Mountain Station. It was 2 hours later whenit crashed into Earths atmospherenorth of Iceland.

The asteroid is estimated to be 10 feet wide andmoved at a speed of 11 miles per second.

Get more updates on this story and more with The Blueprint, our daily newsletter:Sign up here for free.

The aftermath of 2022 EB5 is not certain, but it is believed that it either burned up in the atmosphere or fell into the Arctic Ocean. If it burned up, it is not known whether any residualfragments have made it to the ground or not, either.

The International Meteor Organization, on the other hand, is looking for information from anybody who may have witnessed 2022 EB5's dazzling meteor. A flash of light or a boom was observed by a few persons in Iceland. You can submit your report from this link if you think you've seen the meteor.

Most of the asteroids in the Solar system orbit the Sun in a vast ring between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. This area called the Asteroid Belt is estimated to containmore than 200 asteroids that are larger than 60 miles in diameter. In addition to that, there are between 1.1 million and 1.9 million asteroids larger than 0.6 milesin diameter and millions of smaller ones, according to NASA.

Although big collisions are really rare, thousands of tiny meteorite fragments hit the Earth each year. Most of these occasions, however, are unanticipated and go unreported because they occur in wide swathes of uninhabited woodland or in the open waters of the oceans.

Go here to read the rest:

An asteroid is spotted 2 hours before it slams into the Earth at 11 miles per second - Interesting Engineering

Read More..

Bitcoin And Ethereum See $120M In Weekly Outflows What’s The Major Trigger? – Benzinga – Benzinga

After seven weeks of consecutive inflows, digital asset investment products saw $110 million worth of net outflows last week.

What Happened:In thelatest editionof its Digital Asset Fund Flows Weekly Report,CoinSharesfound that $80 million worth of outflows were from North America alone. CoinShares believes these outflows may have been a response to the U.S.Presidential Executive Orderon digital assets.

Bitcoin(CRYPTO:BTC) investment products saw $69.6 million in outflows for the week, whileEthereum(CRYPTO:ETH) recorded a $50.6 million outflow. Overall, the two leading crypto assets recorded $120 million in outflows.

Bitcoin investment fundssaw $1 billion in volume last week, down from the average $1.24 billion, representing just 5% of total bitcoin trading volumes, stated CoinShares.

Regulatory concerns and geopolitics remain at the forefront of investors concerns for digital assets, said the firm.

While some large-cap altcoins, includingSolana(CRYPTO:SOL),Ripple(CRYPTO:XRP), andPolkadot(CRYPTO:DOT) saw minor inflows of $300,000, $700,000, and $900,000 respectively,Cardano(CRYPTO:ADA) andLitecoin(CRYPTO:LTC) recorded $200,000 worth of inflows over the week.

See Also: https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-buy-cardano-ada/

Last week, CoinShares noted another report that crypto trading volumes in Russia and Ukraine had risen sharply since the conflict between the nations escalated.

Combined, Russia, and Ukraine have seen daily trading volumes rise to $80m/day at times. This has predominantly been against the crypto pairs USDT and BUSD, commonly used US Dollar stable coins (crypto coins that are pegged to the US Dollar), but we have also seen significant amounts of Bitcoin and Ethereum used too, read the report.

Price Action: At press time, Bitcoin was trading at $38,812, up 0.56% in the last 24 hours. Ethereum was trading 0.88% lower at a price of $2,549.

See the rest here:
Bitcoin And Ethereum See $120M In Weekly Outflows What's The Major Trigger? - Benzinga - Benzinga

Read More..

Will Bitcoin’s Price Hit $100,000? Apple’s Wozniak Thinks So – TheStreet

The Mighty Woz has spoken.

Apple (AAPL) - Get Apple Inc. Report co-founder Steve Wozniak put in his two cents about bitcoin recently, saying that he believes the cryptocurrency will reach $100,000.

Wozniak made his comments on the podcast "Steve-O's Wild Ride," hosted by the "Jackass" star.

He discussed his experience with bitcoin, the world's largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization.

Wozniak noted how bitcoin prices have soared a few times when he owned it and he now only has a small amount to experiment with.

"I think Bitcoin is going to go to $100,000," he said. "I dont know where I get that feeling. I cant put any mathematics to it. I just really feel it based on all the interest. The interest in crypto is so high."

Bitcoin was down 8.6% to $38,807 Friday at last check, according to CoinGecko.

Wozniak,who founded Apple with Steve Jobs in 1976,cited the increasing number of cryptocurrencies, saying "everybody has a way to create a new one, and you have a celebrity star with it."

"It seems like theyre just collecting a bunch of money from people who want to invest at the very earliest stage, when its worth pennies," he added.

He also said that the number of people getting ripped off with crypto and NFTs, or non-fungible tokens "is just outrageous."

"Bitcoin is safe because it's the big elephant on the block," he said. "It's stable."

Wozniak, who left Apple in 1985, has had his own experience with crypto scams.

Last year,Wozniak has lost his lawsuit to sue YouTube over scam videos that claimed he was the host of a fake bitcoin giveaway and used his image.

Santa Clara County (Calif.) Superior Court Judge Sunil R. Kulkarni ruled that YouTube and its parent company Google (GOOGL) - Get Alphabet Inc. Class A Reportwere protected under federal law from responsibility for their users' posts.

Images and a video of Wozniak were used by YouTube scammers to trick viewers into believing he was hosting a live giveaway, in which anyone who sent him bitcoin would receive double the amount in return, according to the lawsuit.

Wozniak is involved with a realityshow called "Unicorn Hunters", which introduced its own cryptocurrency, Unicoin, last month.

In 2020, Wozniak launchedEfforce, a Malta-based blockchain project for funding energy-efficient businesses.The company's cryptocurrency token is named WOZX.

More:
Will Bitcoin's Price Hit $100,000? Apple's Wozniak Thinks So - TheStreet

Read More..

Kazakhstan: Bolat Nazarbayev named and shamed over bitcoin mining – Eurasianet

As pressure mounts on the family of Nursultan Nazarbayev, the former president, the authorities have accused his brother of involvement in business activities presenting a threat to the countrys economic security.

Bolat Nazarbayev had a hand in lucrative cryptocurrency mining operations in northern Kazakhstan that have now stopped, the Agency for Financial Monitoring reported on March 15.

The shutdown was voluntary, the agency said. It did not specifically accuse him of illegally mining bitcoins, but its statement was headlined as a report about illegal mining activity.

The public naming and shaming of Bolat Nazarbayev came two days after the arrest of a nephew of Bolat and Nursultan Nazarbayev, as President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev moves to weaken the familys political and economic grip following fatal January unrest in which elite infighting played a role.

Law-enforcement officers detained Kairat Satybaldy on March 13 on suspicion of embezzlement and say they are investigating him over possible involvement in crimes undermining the security of the state.

This is the first time Bolat Nazarbayev has been publicly identified by investigators, who have already targeted the business interests of Aliya Nazarbayeva, the former presidents youngest daughter.

But Tokayev had previously ordered a crackdown on Altyn Orda, an Almaty wholesale market reputed to be associated with Bolat Nazarbayev, which the president described as a shady environment for criminal elements. Tokayev has also demanded an end to smuggling on the Chinese border, where Bolat Nazarbayev is reputed to have business interests.

Investigators also identified Kayrat Sharipbayev, who is believed to be the partner of Dariga Nazarbayeva, the former presidents eldest daughter, as another businessman involved in cryptocurrency mining. Sharipbayev lost his job as head of the state-owned Qazaq Gas company in January as the Nazarbayev family began to come under pressure.

Other powerful businessmen who have now voluntarily halted bitcoin mining include Aleksandr Klebanov, who owns a 50 percent stake in the Central Asian Power Energy Company, and Yerlan Nigmatullin, whose diverse portfolio of business interests covers the agriculture, retail, food and transport sectors. The latter is the twin brother of former parliament speaker Nurlan Nigmatullin. Pharmaceutical tycoon Kairat Itemgenov and Major-General Tlegen Matkenov, a former police chief in the southern Zhambyl Region, have also agreed to stop mining, the Agency for Financial Monitoring said.

Bitcoin mining presents a threat to the countrys economic security because of its rampant use of energy that increased the risks of supply disruptions and electric power shortages for ordinary consumers and entrepreneurs, the agency reported.

The government has previously blamed bitcoin miners for placing an excessive load on energy infrastructure and caused an increasing number of rolling power blackouts in Kazakhstan.

According to the Energy Ministry, power consumption in January-October 2021 grew by 8 percent compared to the same period a year earlier. In earlier years, consumption grew annually by less than 2 percent.

The authorities began cracking down on illegal bitcoin mining at the beginning of this year, closing down 13 illegal operations.

Now, 55 mining outfits have agreed to voluntarily close in the latest crackdown. Investigators have opened 25 criminal cases and confiscated 67,000 pieces of equipment worth an estimated 100 billion tenge ($194 million), the agency said.

Much of the equipment was brought in from China, South Korea, Singapore, Turkey and Georgia. In one case in Almaty, officers confiscated 1,000 pieces of kit worth 2.8 billion tenge ($5.4 million) that had been smuggled in from China.

Cryptocurrency mining boomed in Kazakhstan after a ban on the business in China last summer brought bitcoin miners flocking in, turning the country into the worlds second-largest producer.

But as Rest of World, a website based in the U.S. covering tech developments, reported this week, with the government now cracking down on illegal mining and hiking taxes on legal miners, the business now appears to be going from boom to bust in Kazakhstan.

More:
Kazakhstan: Bolat Nazarbayev named and shamed over bitcoin mining - Eurasianet

Read More..