WASHINGTON The U.S. and allies are using a new forum started by the Pentagons top artificial intelligence office to work toward developing AI systems that can connect in the future to help them fight better together.
The Partnership for Defense, started by the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center last September, is laying the groundwork for future AI-enabled joint war-fighting capabilities that will need to connect to each other for the U.S. and its allies to effectively fight as a coalition.
One day, the countries could collaborate on other AI-backed efforts, such as sharing data from sensors that track how machines run to predict when maintenance is needed before parts fail, possibly during a mission when theres no time to lose for repairs or replacements. Or the allies could use AI for data about shipping and supply movements to improve logistics efficiency.
The end goal is for the allied nations to be ready to cooperate easily on AI-driven projects in the future.
But first, the U.S. and partner countries must start at a basic level of readying data for artificial intelligence, viewing the information as a war-fighting resource. That starts with keeping and storing all of the facts and figures that AI needs to work.
The U.S. and its allies messed up in not using data or looking at data over the last several decades as a resource, said Stephanie Culberson, head of international AI policy at the JAIC. For instance, if we were to go to war again in Afghanistan, would we have all the data that we pulled in the last 20 years? You can probably guess the answer to that.
The partnership came from smaller discussions that the JAIC had with like-minded nations. After several interactions, it became clear that the nations struggled with the same challenges around scaling AI efforts, educating and training the workforce on AI, and overcoming internal cultures resistant to technological change, Culberson said.
We started to realize that many of us are grappling with the same hard problems in implementing AI into our defense organizations, Culberson said. Instead of staying within those siloes on our own, I thought, Well, why dont we pull together some of the strongest nations that are really focused on this in their defense sector and do this together?
Sign up for the C4ISRNET newsletter about future battlefield technologies.
(please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
Subscribe
By giving us your email, you are opting in to the C4ISRNET Daily Brief.
Thus far, the partnership includes defense representatives from Australia, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Israel, Japan, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The group has twice gathered to identify common challenges, and meetings are expected three times a year.
The Partnership for Defense is not working on codevelopment of AI systems, rather its focused on preparing allied militaries to be AI-ready, as Culberson puts it.
We decided to talk about building blocks that we all need to work through that are massive undertakings for ministries of defense, Culberson said. For instance, how are we handing data? For the most part, not very well.
The meetings are different than typical international conversations with foreign militaries, which can be rigid, Culberson said. The partnership meetings encourage open dialogue, including roundtable discussions and TED Talk-style presentations describing how ministries tackle challenges and analysis of case studies for lessons learned.
In the next two years of the partnership, Culberson said that she really wants to have a solid foundation for AI-readiness, developing a way to assess whether members have achieved that readiness. In a few years, she said, the countries could consider codeveloping a data aggregation capability.
This is how we do interoperability as well, Culberson said. We dont want to get too far down the path of everyones doing their own thing in their siloes, and then we look up and next time we need to go to war together, or even humanitarian assistance or any of those types of things where we might use our militaries together, nothing is interoperable.
The JAICs role on the international stage
Since its inception about two years ago, the JAICs mission has been to help the Pentagons internal components adopt artificial intelligence, through its national mission initiatives or by delivering services. Adding international engagement to its portfolio also serves that mission.
I see it has kind of the same thing actually for international: to help enable key allies and partners, which at the end of the day is going to make our war fighter more ready to have ready allies at their side, Culberson said.
U.S. military services are starting to try to include allies and partners as they develop their joint war-fighting systems, such as the Air Forces Advanced Battle Management System or the Armys Project Convergence.
Those service-led programs, which will rely heavily on artificial intelligence, are how the services plan to connect sensors and shooters for future battles. Work with allies now will ease challenges plugging them together later.
In this broader strategic competition between the U.S. and China, as it continues to evolve, the Defense Department will need these avenues for partnerships, said Megan Lamberth, research associate at the Center for a New American Security. It allows for increased interoperability between partner militaries, and it gives countries access to broader, more robust shared datasets.
The partnership could lead to talent-sharing programs that would benefit the Pentagon, Lamberth added, particularly given workforce shortages in AI professionals.
The Partnership for Defense has an open door to adding more allies, Culberson said. While other nations have expressed interest, members plan to set admission standards before expanding.
I dont want it just to be the U.S. projecting, which is often I think expected when we have multilateral conversations like this, Culberson said. Instead I want it to be truly a forum where like-minded allies can come together and share and learn.
Read more:
For US and allies, prepping for AI warfare starts with the data - C4ISRNet
Read More..