Category Archives: Bitcoin
Bitcoin Ransomware Education CrptXXX – The Merkle
Bitcoin ransomware families are plentiful, which is what makes them incredibly dangerous. In some cases, different types of ransomware will have a similar name, which causes some confusion. CrptXXX is a type of malware that should not be confused with CryptXXX, even though both types of malicious software work towards a similar goal. CrptXXX is quite a powerful type of malware, although it can be removed with relative ease.
Most people are well aware of how ransomware works. This malicious software encrypts all files on the computer, gives them a random file extension, and forces users to pay a ransom in bitcoin to restore file access. However, certain types of malware have proven to be quite more potent than others, as its developers bring additional features to the table. After all, why only encrypt data when there is much more havoc to wreak?
In the case of CrptXXX, the ransomware does a few different things. Granted, in adds the.crptxxx extension to all encrypted files. Moreover, once this payload is active on a computer, it can modify all accessible files with relative ease. This allows users to retain some level of control over the machine so they can pay the ransom. Neither of these features is out of the ordinary, as those are the basic functions of any malware strain in existence.
What CrptXXX does differently is how it also allows the ransomware developer to gain remote control over the computer as long as the files remain encrypted. This gives criminals backdoor access to the device in question, which allows them to copy any file from the computer and make it their own. Through a dedicated Trojan component, CrptXXX victims can be spied upon at any given time, which is quite a troubling thought.
Speaking of which, information harvesting is what makes CrptXXX even more dangerous compared to most other types of malware. Downloading key settings, recording account credentials, and even stealing personal files is just a few of the possibilities. However, the bread and butter remains infected files and demanding a bitcoin ransom to have file access restored. With a variable ransom demand, CrptXXX developers are always looking for their next big score.
Distribution of CrptXXX is what one would expect from similar campaigns these days. Email spam, pirated content downloads, and infected software installers are the three most common distribution methods for CrptXXX. Additionally, it is possible to infect victims with this payload through direct attacks in the form of exploit kits or vulnerability testing frameworks. So far, CrptXXX is believed to have caused quite a bit of damage, although a solution has been provided to remove the malware completely without paying the bitcoin ransom.
Unlike most other types of ransomware, CrptXXX does not appear to delete the shadow volume copies. This allows users to restore files from a previous data backup. That is quite a relief to most people who had to deal with this ransomware in the past, as there is nothing more disturbing than losing valuable files due to a malware attack. Always back up important computer files on a regular basis, as one never knows when that backup may come in handy.
If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and technology news.
Follow this link:
Bitcoin Ransomware Education CrptXXX - The Merkle
Where to, Bitcoin? Traders Offer Mixed Opinions on Market Direction … – CoinDesk
The path forward for bitcoin prices isn'tclear, market analysts say.
While some described the market to CoinDesk as bearish overall, other observers offered a more optimistic stance about the prospects for future price developments. Theirinput comes as bitcoin prices have largely traded rangebound in the last few days, fluctuating between $1,010 and $1,060, according to the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index (BPI).
While bitcoin prices reached an all-time high of more than $1,300 earlier this month in the lead up to the US Securities and Exchange Commissionruling on the bitcoin ETF proposed by investors Cameron and TylerWinklevoss twins, they have fallen since. Interestingly enough, bitcoin prices werelittle changed when the SEC shot down a bitcoinETF proposed by SolidX.
Others highlighted that sentiment has, for better or worse, changed in recent days. Much of the attention seems to have squared on the prospects of a possible bitcoin hard fork and the resulting tension that has taken hold.
"The market has seen a switch in sentiment from hope of ETF approval to the ugliness of internal fighting," said Charles Hayter, founder and CEO of CryptoCompare.
Some analysts pointed to this ongoing dilemma when providing their overall bearish views of the market. One lingering concern is that a fork could drive down prices sharply, prompting some to hedge their bets ahead of any possible disruption.
According to Jacob Eliosoff, a cryptocurrency fund manager, the situation is becoming a key driver of that bearishness.
He told CoinDesk:
"Bitcoin is a very fundamental market right now: the price is going down because the dev project is imploding in near civil war."
Not all agreed with this assessment, however. OTC trader Harry Yeh struck a more practical outlook, arguingthat bitcoin's upside has been limited as a result.
"We see this as being priced in now and don't foresee major prices moves past $1,200 in the near term," he said.
Tim Enneking, chairman of Crypto Asset Management, offered similar sentiment, telling CoinDesk that "hard fork concerns are capping upward movement". However, he also emphasized that "solid BTC fundamentals, interest and growth potential" were creating a floor for prices.
While Enneking offered a moderate assessment of the situation, a handful of analysts insisted that bitcoin's long-term trend was bullish. Arthur Hayes, co-founder and CEO of leveraged bitcoin trading platform BitMEX, stated that the digital currency's recent pullbacks in price represent a "healthy correction".
"The additional uncertainty surrounding the potential hard fork also acts as a price dampener," he added.
Image via Shutterstock
marketsPrices
Continue reading here:
Where to, Bitcoin? Traders Offer Mixed Opinions on Market Direction ... - CoinDesk
Is Ethereum The New Bitcoin? | The Huffington Post – Huffington Post
Why is Ethereum sudden rise?
During the last month, Ether, or the digital asset that fuels the whole Ethereum blockchain, has grown more than 300%, reaching its all time high of about $60 a few days ago.
At present time, Ether has a value of $50.59 with a market capitalization of $4,469,204,016, the second most important cap right after Bitcoin ($16,278,519,837).
But why this sudden rise? Why the younger brother of bitcoin rose so much during the last few days?
As often happens in the financial markets, the answer is not only one, but a combination of many factors that more or less affect the trading.
Lets see the most crucial facts.
In period of political and economic uncertainty, people often decide to invest in non traditional assets.
For example, when Donald Trump was elected president, investors started to buy bitcoins and the stronger demand drove the digital currency price.
The same thing happens when bitcoin faces a period of crisis, so that altcoins (or how all the other digital currencies besides bitcoin are defined) start to become the new alternative.
In fact, during those days Bitcoin is facing a great issue: the block size debate.
Just for those who dont know, the block size debate is an open discussion about the possibility to increase the size of the blocks which the bitcoin blockchain is composed by, in order to have faster transactions and maybe lower fees.
In order to solve this issue, the bitcoin community and developers are deciding how to proceed and how to implement a soft or hard fork.
In the latest case, this would lead to a disruptive event that would also open the door for a new digital currency to steal part of the Bitcoin-related interest.
Of course, this issue is causing a growing insecurity among investors that are opting for safer and more stable (right now, at least) digital assets such as Ethereum.
As you can see, in fact, bitcoin price is falling down and the Ethereum one is rising. This cannot be considered only a coincidence.
Another important news that drove the Ethereum price is the one occurred on March 10th, when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rejected a rule change that would have allowed the creation of the first Bitcoin ETF to begin trading on the Bats BZX Exchange.
The initial hope about the approval of Winklevoss proposed ETF pushed bitcoin as high as $1,327, hitting its all-time high. But the denial caused a collapse - momentary, at least - of the bitcoin price with a drop of $300, so investors began to favor Ethereum.
We have to say, in fact that the greatest part of Ether trading volume comes always from Bitcoin/Ether trades.
Ethereum Enterprise Alliance
Another main factor that is influencing the Ether rally is that its underlying technology - the Ethereum blockchain - is reaching much interest among big companies.
In fact, a new working group called the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance was recently created in order to connect large enterprises to technology vendors with the main goal of working on new projects with the use of the distributed ledger.
Major companies that are involved in the Enterprise launch include JPMorgan, IBM, Microsoft and Intel among the others.
Of course, this move added more legitimacy to the ether digital asset.
Also, we need to tell that this new Enterprise Ethereum Alliance requires ether to be transferred and stored in order to get full access to the applications that use Ethereum.
In fact, we should remember that any application or contract need an ether transaction to be correctly executed and stored in the Ethereum blockchain.
Clarified briefly how the so-called dapps can work on the Ethereum blockchain and having this in mind, we also need to say that recently there are more and more projects, tokens and ICOs launched on the network.
The Ethereum digital assets, in fact, recently hitted a market capitalization of about $260 million ($262,877,525 USD according to March 24th data) with projects like Golem, DAO and Augur and more coming soon.
For example, Brave Browser is going to launch a new ICO later this year for its project of a new web and mobile browser that reward users that decide to switch on ads.
Also, Storj decided to move its tokens from Counterparty to Ethereum because of its active development, speed in executing transactions and negligible fees.
This means that more projects are exploiting the Ethereum blockchain with the immediate consequence of an increasing of the ether price and amount of transactions executed within the ledger.
Start your workday the right way with the news that matters most.
Go here to read the rest:
Is Ethereum The New Bitcoin? | The Huffington Post - Huffington Post
Bitcoin Scam Site Warning MiningPeak – The Merkle
Whenever a new bitcoin cloud mining site launches, there is plenty of reason to scrutinize the platform. There have been numerous bitcoin cloud mining scams, all of which successfully defrauded investors. It is doubtful MiningPeak is a legitimate company, as there are a lot of questions that remain unanswered. Right now, the company does not warrant an investment.
Glancing over the MiningPeak website, it is evident this company has little to no honest intention. Although the platform design is not bad by any means, there is a huge lack of information. Moreover, the company only launched on March 27th, yet they somehow claim to have over 690 investors already. Rest assured that number is fake and only serves to make people believe the company is legitimate.
The one thing investors hope to see from a bitcoin cloud mining company is whether or not they have the hardware to back up the claims. So far, that does not appear to be the case, as there is absolutely no evidence of MiningPeak even owning a single bitcoin miner. No one should be surprised by this, though, as hardly any bitcoin cloud mining company has the equipment required to run a successful business.
What makes MiningPeak even more suspicious is how their investment plans guarantee fixed returns on a daily basis. It is impossible to offer the same amount of money while active in the bitcoin mining world. A total of three investment plans is offered, which return between 3.6% and 4.56% on a daily basis. It is always baffling how investing more money into these scams will automatically grant higher daily returns.
MiningPeak would not be a proper bitcoin Ponzi scheme without offering a lucrative affiliate program. Investors will earn 5% commission for every new investor, they bring to this platform. However, for those referrals who become an official partner, the affiliate will earn 10% commission. Keep in mind these profits can only be earned once the affiliate is an active investor of the platform. This is just another ploy by a fraudulent company to attract as much funds as possible before disappearing.
One thing that will not surprise anyone is how MiningPeak is apparently registered as a company in the United Kingdom. Once again, this recurring scheme of getting a UK company number at a cheap cost makes these companies appear more legitimate. Do not be fooled by this tactic, as the company number means nothing for the validity of this business. Moreover, the address listed on the site will not house any mining equipment, that much is a foregone conclusion.
As one would expect, the MiningPeak team lists no personal information on the website. Any company in the bitcoin mining world needs to be transparent about who is working for them, yet this scam prefers not to do so. The WHOIS information reveals no additional details either, as everything is WHOISGuard protected. We do know the domain name will expire in February of 2018, albeit it is doubtful MiningPeak will still be around by that time.
If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and technology news.
Read the rest here:
Bitcoin Scam Site Warning MiningPeak - The Merkle
Bitcoin Unlimited Miners May Be Preparing a 51% Attack on Bitcoin … – Bitcoin Magazine
Although it is hard to say how big the chance actually is, Bitcoin Unlimited miners may soon start mining bigger blocks. If they do, they will diverge from the current Bitcoin protocol to split off to a new blockchain. This could also result in two separate currencies, by many exchanges referred to as BTC and BTU.
However, it increasingly seems that not everyone in favor of a Bitcoin Unlimited hard fork wants to settle for a coin-split. Instead, several prominent Bitcoin Unlimited proponents have indicated that it may be better to ensure only their chain survives. This is probably also the only chance it has to be widely considered the real Bitcoin rather than a spinoff altcoin.
To ensure that only one chain survives, they have suggested that the (original) Bitcoin blockchain can be made unusable. That way it would die off and only the Bitcoin Unlimited chain would remain.
Specifically, if miners favorable toward Bitcoin Unlimited are able to overpower the remaining Bitcoin miners with a majority of hashrate, its been suggested they could launch a 51% attack.
Here is a brief overview.
Former Bitcoin Lead Developer Gavin Andresen
Gavin Andresen is the former lead developer of Bitcoin Core (then called Bitcoin-QT or simply Bitcoin). He has since contributed to Bitcoin XT and Bitcoin Classic. He now endorses Bitcoin Unlimited though he does not contribute to the project nor is he a member.
Although Andresen has in the past argued that a minority chain would be unlikely to sustain itself, he now acknowledges such a chain could, in fact, survive. As such, he noted on Twitter last February that preventing a minority-hashrate fork from confirming any transactions is a good idea.
More recently, on Reddit, Andresen elaborated on what the most effective way to attack the original Bitcoin chain would be. The former lead developer wrote:
It would be even more destructive to mine an 11-block-long empty chain, then wait until the slow chain gets 9 blocks until announcing it to the network. Or keep them guessing; choose a chain length at random, from 1 to some secret N, and orphan that many blocks at a time. Allow a couple normal blocks, then do it again.
It would be impossible for exchanges to know how many confirmations were safe for deposits and would be a nightmare for their withdrawal accounting.
Additionally, he said he wasnt sure whether such an attack would be immoral or not.
Im not even sure this kind of thing should be considered immoral majority hashpower acting selfishly for their own economic benefit (both short and long term) is the basic incentive structure that makes Bitcoin work.
And last weekend, Andresen on Twitter further distanced himself from a moral endorsement of such an attack. Instead, echoing comments he made on Reddit, Andresen claimed to have merely been exercising adversarial thinking.
Though he did add that an attack is very likely to happen.
BTC.TOP Pool Operator Jiang Zhuoer
BTC.TOP is a relatively new Chinese mining pool. Launched in late 2016, the pool currently controls some 5 percent of hash power on the Bitcoin network.
BTC.TOP is operated by Jiang Zhuoer, a former employee at China Mobile in Shanghai. Much like several other small mining pools that have appeared over the past six months, BTC.TOP has been signaling support for Bitcoin Unlimited.
In an interview with Cryptocoins News in March, Zhuoer was the first who explicitly said a 51% attack against the original Bitcoin blockchain, if it were to survive after Bitcoin Unlimited miners split off, is on the table.
We have prepared $100 million USD to kill the small fork of CoreCoin, no matter what [proof-of-work] algorithm, sha256 or scrypt or X11 or any other GPU algorithm, he said, of course referring to the continuation of the current Bitcoin protocol as CoreCoin.
The different hash algorithms mentioned by Zhuoer refer to a potential proof-of-work algorithm change Bitcoin users could deploy if the chain is attacked; a nuclear defense some Bitcoin Core developers have suggested may be proposed in such a scenario. (Whether this should still be considered Bitcoin or yet another spinoff altcoin is subject to different debate.)
Show me your money, Zhuoer added. We very much welcome a CoreCoin change to [proof of stake].
(If no proof-of-work algorithm succeeds in deterring the attack, a proof-of-stake consensus algorithm where coin holders rather than miners vote on the longest chain may be an alternative solution. But since this is unproven and perhaps insecure, this seems highly unlikely.)
Bitcoin Unlimited Chief Scientist Peter Rizun
Peter Rizun (better known as Peter R) refers to himself as the chief scientist of Bitcoin Unlimited, and has been one of the driving forces as the projects secretary.
Last week, Rizun, along with bitcoin.com business developer Jake Smith, visited the offices of Coinbase and BitPay to promote Bitcoin Unlimited. Coming back from these visits, Rizun published a blog post on Medium. The message Rizun said he had gotten from these companies is that a hard fork to larger blocks should be decisive and absolute.
Rizun described three levels of anti-split protection that could accomplish this. The first is an explanation of how mining would probably be unprofitable on the original Bitcoin chain decreasing the odds of the chain surviving in the first place.
The second level, however, is a type of 51% attack on a minority of miners. Once a majority of hash power signals support for Bitcoin Unlimited, Rizun wrote, the majority could reject (orphan) any blocks that do not signal this support.
Miners will orphan the blocks of non-compliant miners prior to the first larger block to serve as a reminder to upgrade. Simply due to the possibility of having blocks orphaned, all miners would be motivated to begin signaling for larger blocks once support definitively passes 51%. If some miners hold out (e.g., they may not be paying attention regarding the upgrade), then they will begin to pay attention after losing approximately $15,000 of revenue due to an orphaned block.
(It should be noted that this attack can be trivially subverted. Especially now that the attack is known, miners can, and probably will, signal fake support. Indeed, at least one small pool has literally signaled support with a poop emoticon.)
If the original Bitcoin blockchain survives even after these two levels, Rizun explained that a subset of miners in favor of Bitcoin Unlimited could disrupt this chain by exclusively producing empty blocks on the original chain. This would prevent any and all transactions from confirming as long as the attack is ongoing.
To address the risk of coins being spent on this chain (replay risk), majority miners will deploy hash power as needed to ensure the minority chain includes only empty blocks after the forking point.
And in line with the strategy described by Gavin Andresen:
This can easily be accomplished if the majority miners maintain a secret chain of empty blocks built off their last empty block publishing only as much of this chain as necessary to orphan any non-empty blocks produced on the minority chain.
(This attack can be waited out until the attackers funds run out, and perhaps dismantled altogether. Discussion on potential strategies is ongoing on the Bitcoin-development mailing list. And of course, there is the potential of a proof-of-work algorithm change.)
While noting that he doesnt necessarily endorse the strategy, Rizun predicted that a coin-split would be avoided in this way: a safe upgrade procedure, he later noted on Reddit.
Rizun also submitted his ideas to the Bitcoin-development mailing list. (Where it was, unsurprisingly, forcefully dismissed.)
Bitmain Co-CEO Jihan Wu
Jihan Wu is the co-CEO of Chinese ASIC-hardware producer Bitmain. AntPool is Bitmains mining pool, and BTC.com, another mining pool, is a subsidiary of Bitmain.
Wu is a vocal proponent of Bitcoin Unlimited as well, and announced to Bloomberg that he would switch the hash power in his pool to Bitcoin Unlimited in anticipation of a hard fork which he has since indeed done. (Though, notably, BTC.com has not.)
And in an interview with Forbes, Wu said he wouldnt rule out attacking the Bitcoin blockchain, or, undermining Core as it is described in the article.
It may not be necessary to attack it, he said. But to attack it is always an option.
Thanks to Libbitcoin lead developer Eric Voskuil for feedback.
Original post:
Bitcoin Unlimited Miners May Be Preparing a 51% Attack on Bitcoin ... - Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin Casinos Are Not a Bubble, Why? – newsBTC
Bitcoin is good, Bitcoin is bad. Well, which is it? If Bitcoin is bad, is money bad? Bitcoin is simply a digital form of money, so what is wrong with that?
There are talks of bubbles in both the United States political and economic power bases. Stocks are at record highs and some fear a bubble. Are Bitcoin Casinos in a bubble too? Here is why they arent.
Nowadays, there are people throwing mud everywhere. Celebrity A does not like Celebrity B, so she spreads a false rumor about her.
The same has been true for Bitcoin. Those who do not own Bitcoins are jealous, so they spread false rumors about this crypto currency. One day, they will have to admit that Bitcoin is simply a convenient way for you to make electronic transactions.
Some fear technology. Some fear progress. Some fear Bitcoin. But, if you are wise that is why you should like Bitcoin. Bitcoin is power.
Why would anyone be afraid of Bitcoin? The people who are against progress are afraid of Bitcoin. Why is Bitcoin here to stay?
The most effective money reflects the needs of the society at large. With more online financial transactions occurring every day, electronic money is a necessity. The old paper and plastic forms of money are old hat; they are grossly inefficient.
Bitcoin is an electronic currency created online and ideal for usage online. It grows as the Web grows. It is very efficient and does not require you to own a credit card.
There is no Credit Score with Bitcoin. There is no Credit Check with Bitcoin. There is no Credit Card application with Bitcoin. There is no annual percentage rate (APR) or late fees with Bitcoin. You can be free with Bitcoin.
The world is facing a revolution where the young tech-savvy masses are trying to outrun the slow, lazy government bureaucrats. The fast-moving World Wide Web and Bitcoin Casinos are new and cannot be controlled by lazy government bureaucrats.
Bitcoin gambling continues to grow in real numbers that is not true for bubbles. Bubbles involve fake speculation.
There have been some governmental actions shutting down online betting in various countries, such as Slovenia. The behind-the-times, brick-and-mortar governments are battling against the fast-moving, cutting-edge online gamblers. Some people have been forced to leave their home countries, in order to gamble.
People will turn to black markets to get what they want. That happened as the Soviet Union collapsed. Presently, the United States is collapsing.
Senior citizens dont understand Bitcoin Casinos. Because of this reality, Bitcoin Casinos can remain one step ahead of the posse.
People want to have some fun. Bitcoin Casinos provide them with this much-needed entertainment. Bitcoin Casinos can also be used to raise supplemental income.
Bitcoin continues to grow in importance with more global brands allowing payment therein. Lamborghini has added Bitcoin payment for its luxury automobiles. All around the world, the top brands are realizing that taking digital currencies for payment, only makes good common sense.
Who doesnt want more customers?
Bitcoin is not a bubble because there are still Bitcoins being mined. A bubble occurs after an asset has peaked. Experts see that Bitcoin has a bright future. In fact, Bitcoin has just passed the value of gold in 2017. The Bitcoin community is amped! Get on board before the train leaves the station!
Read the original:
Bitcoin Casinos Are Not a Bubble, Why? - newsBTC
Use of Bitcoin illegal, can attract anti-money laundering law – Economic Times
NEW DELHI: The government today said use of virtual currencies like Bitcoins is not authorised by RBI and could result in breach of anti-money laundering provisions.
The RBI has already cautioned users, holders and traders of virtual currency, including Bitcoin, about the potential financial, legal and security risks arising from the usage.
"The absence of counter parties in usage of virtual currencies including Bitcoins, for illicit and illegal activities in anonymous/pseudonymous systems could subject the users to unintentional breaches of anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism laws," Minister of State for Finance, Arjun Ram Meghwal, said in a written reply in the Rajya Sabha.
He further said that the creation of virtual currencies like Bitcoins as a medium of payments is not authorised by any central bank or monetary authority.
"No regulatory approval, registration or authorisation is stated to have been obtained by the entities concerned for carrying on such activities," Meghwal said.
The RBI had earlier warned that any user, holder, investor and trader dealing with virtual currencies would be doing so at his/her own risk.
Read the rest here:
Use of Bitcoin illegal, can attract anti-money laundering law - Economic Times
What Would Satoshi Do? The Religiosity in Bitcoin – The Merkle
January 3, 2009 sparked a new life into the world of payments, contracts, and finance. On that day, Satoshi Nakamoto released the open-source software Bitcoin. It promised revolution and freedom from third parties -such as banks and governments- as guarantors of capital. Suddenly, an individual was able to bargain, trade, and retain wealth completely by themselves. It was like using cash all the time, but without needing to have a bank and/or government call the cash legitimate.
Such a powerful liberation of individuals and the strongly libertarian, addictive qualities of this new and exciting currency are palpable on early and current forums. Loudtones of the new order of individuals pepper the threads about Bitcoin. It is no wonder why people feel so strongly about either the coin or the creator themselves, Satoshi Nakamoto. Nakamoto breathed life into Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general, and thus the communities which have been created since then are in some shape or form in Nakamotos name and/or image. Nakamoto is, for the coin and community, somewhat of a god. Its developers are high priests, its miners and hashrates are priests and prayers, and its users worship through the shared rituals of the Ledger.
While I recognize that the block size debate is an extremely complex issue with boundless technical aspects and considerations, I think that this potentially divine nature of Nakamoto plays into the emotionally charged conflict over this issue. What would Satoshi Do? is a real consideration for many who have a stake in this debate. Bitcoin Core was founded by Nakamoto, and maintained by Nakamoto until they relinquished control of that to Gavin Andresen. Does this mean that Core is closer to the truth that Nakamoto envisioned? Perhaps not.
Bitcoin Classic and Bitcoin Unlimited both cite to varying degrees their interpretation or others (mis)interpretation of the true vision and roadmap for the coin. Everyone seems to be vying to be closest to the truth set out by Nakamoto in some way or another, either by trying to emulate past ideals or break off and take control of the coin itself -potentially in defiance of what Nakamoto wants-. All of this feels incredibly close to splintering factions of the same religion to me. Is your Nakamoto and my Nakamoto the same one?
In similarly frustrating fashion of more conventional and well-known religion, Nakamoto plays the part now of the god that has left. The creator who has stepped aside from active roles -that we can see- in their creation and view it from the sidelines. Closure is unlikely to come from another divine revelation. Not unlike other communities in search of the true nature of themselves, I think it is easy for debates and disagreements to become heated rather quickly. Heathens and heretics are easy to denounce, to ignore, and to vilify.
In no way am I suggesting Bitcoin and its community is a full religion, but I do find some similarities and parallels interesting aspects to look at it. I will say, though, that as long as there are multiple answers to the question What would Satoshi Do? without any one group being able to give a definitive answer, it will share that aspect with religions: No one can really know, but everyone can believe themselves correct.
If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and technology news.
View original post here:
What Would Satoshi Do? The Religiosity in Bitcoin - The Merkle
Is Bitcoin A Safe Way To Transact Money? – Forbes
Forbes | Is Bitcoin A Safe Way To Transact Money? Forbes Bitcoin was designed to operate independently of any regulatory structure to facilitate anonymous transactions both locally and across international borders. These features make it attractive to some people for certain types of payment, particularly ... |
The rest is here:
Is Bitcoin A Safe Way To Transact Money? - Forbes
IRS Crackdown on Bitcoin Exchange Fuels Privacy Worries – WSJ – Wall Street Journal (subscription)
Wall Street Journal (subscription) | IRS Crackdown on Bitcoin Exchange Fuels Privacy Worries - WSJ Wall Street Journal (subscription) The federal government is ramping up pressure on a leading digital-currency company to turn over a vast amount of its customer records as part of a tax-evasion ... The Tax Man Cometh For Bitcoin - Data Protection - United States |
View post:
IRS Crackdown on Bitcoin Exchange Fuels Privacy Worries - WSJ - Wall Street Journal (subscription)