Category Archives: Cloud Computing
12 Highlights from the First Annual Cloud Insight Jam – Solutions Review
Yesterday, Solutions Review hosted our first ever Cloud Insight Jam and it was a huge success! We received more participation from cloud vendors, thought leaders, and IT experts than we could have hoped for, all sharing their thoughts and insights on cloud computing and how they expect the market to change in 2020. In case you missed the event, wed like to share the key highlights from the Insight Jam!
First, wed like to share our video compilation containing clips on advice and best practices for deploying cloud solutions. We compiled advice from 12 experts in the field of cloud from companies across the globe.
We also pulled several Tweets containing valuable cloud insights and predictions that vendors and individuals shared during the event. The intended backbone of the Cloud Insight Jam was to generate discussion and allow experts a forum for them to provide their thoughts. It was great seeing this concept come to life, as all throughout the day, several cloud solution providers and thought leaders Tweeted their perspectives!
Looking for more info on managed service providers for your cloud solutions? Our2020 MSP Buyers Guide contains profiles on the top cloud managed service providers for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, as well as questions you should ask vendors and yourself before buying. We also offer a2020 MSP Vendor Mapthat outlines those vendors in a Venn diagram to make it easy for you to select potential providers.
Check us out onTwitterfor the latest in Enterprise Cloud news and developments!
Dan is a tech writer who writes about Enterprise Cloud Strategy and Network Monitoring for Solutions Review. He graduated from Fitchburg State University with a Bachelor's in Professional Writing. You can reach him at dhein@solutionsreview.com
Related
Continued here:
12 Highlights from the First Annual Cloud Insight Jam - Solutions Review
How the DOD Plans to Bring Its JEDI Cloud Contract to Life – FedTech Magazine
On Oct. 25, the Defense Department awarded its Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure cloud contract to Microsoft, capping a yearslong effort to start deploying commercial cloud capabilities for Infrastructure as a Service and Platform as a Service. That was just the beginning.
Senior Microsoft leaders including CEO Satya Nadella, Toni Townes-Whitley (one of FedTechs 30 Federal IT Influencers Worth a Follow in 2019), Jason Zander, Tom Keane and Mark Russinovich were scheduled to meet with Pentagon officials last week to lay the foundation for working together, Nextgov reports. Nadella and members of the Microsoft Azure and public sector teams were to meet with DOD CIO Dana Deasy and other senior DOD technology leaders from Dec. 11-13 as part of requisite activities to prepare the cloud environment, the department confirmed to Nextgov.
The Department of Defense is confident in the JEDI Cloud Contract award and remains focused on getting this critical capability into the hands of our warfighters as quickly and efficiently as possible, DOD spokeswoman Elissa Smith told Nextgov. The departments Cloud Computing Program Office continues to work with Microsoft to prepare the JEDI Cloud environment.
MORE FROM FEDTECH: Follow the 5 Rs of rationalization for an effective cloud migration.
DOD has chosen 14 entities to act as pathfinders for the clouds capabilities. Deasy says those Pentagon components which include the U.S. Special Operations Command, the U.S Transportation Command and the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center will be the first to use JEDI on a more tactical level, according to Federal News Network.
These early adopters have unique missions that are more than just using JEDI for base compute, raw storage capacity, and want to do real unique platform-for-service opportunities on top of that, Deasy said Thursday at the Northern Virginia Chapter of AFCEAs Air Force IT Day in Arlington, Va. The variety of the early adopters allows us to test various principles on JEDI from the tactical edge all the way to the top secret needing to use the cross domain.
Deasy indicated the pathfinder components will be able to learn quickly what it takes to go from the strategic vision to stand up and bring JEDI capabilities to life, Federal News Network reports.
Shortly after the contract was awarded, Peter Ranks, a deputy CIO at the DOD, told reporters after speaking at a Professional Services Council event that awarding JEDI was a prerequisite to faster software development. DOD must modernize the way it builds software as it shifts to commercial cloud infrastructure.
If we get modern cloud infrastructure but dont modernize the way we build software, we will not achieve the promises of cloud computing. We want software capabilities in the hands of warfighters faster, Ranks said during his Vision Federal Market Forecast keynote, according to MeriTalk. We want software that can adjust to changing requirements or the changing dynamics of the battlefield more quickly. That is whats driving our cloud strategy.
We have fooled ourselves into thinking that if we can just hire the cloud provider, it will solve all those problems. Hiring the cloud provider wasnt supposed to be the hard part, Ranks added. Like any other weapons system, mastery of the weapons system is really where the challenge comes in, he added.
The DOD has struggled to run applications, such as the Global Command & Control System Joint, across all combatant commands because the cloud infrastructures of the Army, Air Force and Navy vary widely. Ranks said JEDI aims to fix such issues.
What we need is a focused effort to make sure that we have a provider that is filling the gaps in that current multi-cloud solution, he said, according to FedScoop. For all the cloud providers we have today, they still havent solved those problems of classification, tactical edge and something that is common across the enterprise.
Court documents indicate that the DOD has agreed not to proceed with performance under JEDI until at least Feb. 11, aside from initial preparatory activities, pending a lawsuit Amazon Web Services filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims over the award, according to NextGov.
Microsoft says it is pushing ahead with its work on the contract. As the selected contractor to support [the Defense Department] in its mission to modernize its enterprise cloud, we are diligently working with the Cloud Computing Program Office to bring this critical new technology to our men and women in uniform, a Microsoft spokesperson told Nextgov.
Here is the original post:
How the DOD Plans to Bring Its JEDI Cloud Contract to Life - FedTech Magazine
4 Ways Healthcare Is Being Transformed by the Cloud – HealthTech Magazine
Healthcare is increasingly turning to the cloud. According to research from Global Market Insights, the North American healthcare cloud-computing market surpassed $8.5 billion in 2018, and the global market could exceed $55 billion by 2025.
That doesnt mean there hasnt been turbulence along the way, particularly when it comes to the public cloud.
The Nutanix Enterprise Cloud Index 2019, based on a survey of 2,650 IT decision-makers in a variety of industries across the world, found that 73 percent of enterprises were migrating some of their applications back on-premises after finding the public cloud a poor fit for their needs. In fact, 85 percent indicated that the best fit for them was hybrid cloud citing its flexibility and perceived superior security.
READ MORE: Discover fivethings made possible in healthcare thanks to the cloud.
No matter the operating model though, healthcare organizations have made astonishing strides in improving care by employing the cloud. Here are four ways the cloud is making a dramatic difference for patients and staff alike:
Dr. Girish Shirali, a pediatric cardiologist at Childrens Mercy Hospital Kansas City, in Missouri, developed an app that is helping to keeping babies alive. Powered by Microsoft and hosted in Azure, the app allows parents of children born with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), a serious medical condition requiring multiple surgeries, to upload a range of data several times a day.
Before the application, parents had to log the infants vital signs in a three-ring binder and call the hospital to provide that information weekly; a quarter of HLHS patients died before their second surgery at 6 months of age.
It was a reactive model, Lori Erickson, a nurse practitioner, told Microsoft Transform. Childrens Mercy showed that their proactive remote monitoring model made a dramatic difference in outcomes; in fact, in the first two years of the program, the hospital did not lose a single HLHS patient.
Another benefit of Childrens Mercys approach to HLHS care was a reduction in hospital admittances. The flow of real-time data allowed providers to see problems before they became emergencies.
Erickson gave the example of an infant whose weight gain pattern once would have led to hospitalization. By spotting the issue early, she worked with the parents to course-correct before it became serious.
And its not just the providers who learn to see problems coming the system itself can learn.Rather than the analysis simply telling us that saturation is low, [the system] could instead tell us that the risk of an adverse cardiac event in the next three days just went from 2 percent to 40 percent, and tell us why, Shirali told Microsoft Transform.
Hospitals hold massive amounts of sensitive patient data, and it can be a headache for IT staff to keep every system patched and secure. Thats why Novant Health, based in Winston Salem, N.C., migrated its EHR system to a cloud platform in February of 2019. Since the move, the organization has seen ample benefits.
"We have freed up a tremendous amount of engineering resource time from having to manage that infrastructure, James Kluttz, vice president and CTO of Novant Health, tells Beckers Health IT & CIO Report. We have been able to redeploy our resources to focus on business-driven initiatives. We've been able to realign our resources in unique ways that also drive even more cloud adoption.
That change freed up not only staff but budget as well. With the move, the organization gained insight into what its future cost models would look like. Kluttz mentions that Novant has since hit a home run, staying on track with those models.
SIGN UP:Become an Insider for access to exclusive HealthTech videos, white papers and articles.
Before merging with AMITA Health last year, Presence Health in Chicago adopted Nutanix Enterprise Cloud to help with their electronic medical records upgrade. The result was a responsive and robust system that gave care providers near immediate access to the information they needed, whenever they needed it.
The hospitals EMR tracked workflow exceptions unacceptable delays in accessing patient records and the cloud helped the organization to immediately halve these.
There was a dramatic improvement the day we cut over to Nutanix the number of exceptions plummeted from 0.8 percent to just 0.4 percent, said Jeremy Bernstein, then interim CTO of Presence Health, in a customer case study. The cloud also facilitated efficient communication among care team members and enabled the provider to implement barcode medication administration, helping to ensure everyone was consistently on the same page.
Follow this link:
4 Ways Healthcare Is Being Transformed by the Cloud - HealthTech Magazine
Will Amazon Make a Dent in Cisco’s Revenue With This New Project? – The Motley Fool
Every time Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN) ventures into a new business, the targeted industry should worry about the risks of competing against such a disruptive player. For instance, traditional retailers have been struggling against Amazon's e-commerce dominance. And the giant retailer has become a leading public cloud computing company with Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Legacy traditional computer network vendors such as Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:CSCO) may be concerned by Amazon's latest move. Last week, the Linux Foundation announced the DENT project, which is aiming at "the creation of network operating system for disaggregated network switches in campus and remote enterprise locations," and Amazon is one of the six premier members of this initiative.But this apparently disruptive technology may actually have a limited impact.
Before cloud computing emerged a few years ago, computer networking had been following the same model over a couple of decades. Network vendors had been selling monolithic, proprietary solutions that integrated network devices with the software to run these boxes. This was great for customers that wanted a network that just works and that would not distract them from their core business.
Giant cloud providers such as Amazon with AWS and Microsoft with Azure required more scale and flexibility at low cost, though. As a result, solutions that disaggregated software from network devices emerged. For instance, Microsoft developed its network operating system SONiC that can run on any compatible network device. The advantage of this technology is cloud titans can run their tailor-made software on top of any hardware that better fits their needs.
And this technology has been having a significant impact on the networking industry. For instance,Arista Networks grew its revenue from $361 million in 2013 to $2.45 billion over the last 12 months thanks to its network solutions that address cloud titans' requirements.
In contrast, Cisco was late to adapt. Its market share in the high-speed data center network segment dropped from 74.4% in 2013 to 46.6% during the first half of this year.And Cisco announced only last week the disaggregation of its software from its hardware for its new data center networking solution.
Image source: Getty Images.
The idea of the DENT project is to applyto smaller and remote networks the same disruptive technology thatconsisted of separating software and hardware in the cloud data center networks. As an illustration, the project's first use case targets the retail industry, which involves many small locations.
Cisco doesn't disclose its revenue from its enterprise and campus business, but the company's largest segment, "infrastructure platforms" (which includes network devices), represented 57.3% of its revenue during the most recent quarter.Besides,a study indicates Cisco controlled 59% of the enterprise and campus markets in 2018.
Thus, with its disruptive technology on the campus and enterprise network, the DENT project represents a real threat to Cisco, but its impact may stay limited.
First, disaggregating network software and hardwaremakes sense for giant cloud providers since their scale allows them to develop their tailor-made technology in an economical way. But smaller companies don't necessarily want to deal with integrating networking software and hardware. They may still just want an integrated and trouble-free solution that connects their remote locations to their networks. The same concept exists with computer operating systems: Linux is available for free and can run on any personal computer, but many companies prefer to pay for Microsoft's operating system because it won't distract them from their core business.
Second, the DENT project is initially targeting the retail industry. However, some retailers may be reluctant to choose a solution provided by their biggest competitor (Amazon) as we saw when theypreferred Microsoft's cloud for their data centers.
Third, companies may worry about potential future integration of DENT with AWS, making their whole network -- remote locations and data centers -- dependent on Amazon's infrastructure and software.
Finally, even if this disruptive technology expands, Cisco can now quickly adapt since it developed a similar disaggregated solution for data centers.
Thus, investors should not expect any meaningful impact from the DENT project for either Amazon or Cisco. This project may actually signal Amazon is preparing to expand its physical footprint with a tailor-made networking solution that would lower its costs to deploy its remote locations.
And even if the DENT project gains traction, Cisco remains an attractive tech stock. The company will quickly adapt because it recently embraced the concept of disaggregating software and hardware in the data center segment.
See the rest here:
Will Amazon Make a Dent in Cisco's Revenue With This New Project? - The Motley Fool
Scale Computing says it was proved right on edge over cloud – Data Economy
Data Economy was invited on an exclusive press and analysts tour of Silicon Valley data management companies.
New services andproducts from Valley vendors are promising to aid the bottom lines ofenterprises as they manage hybrid clouds.
Our first round coverage from the IT Press Tour last week covered DDN, StorCentric, Data Dynamics, Komprise and HYCU. The next firm we visited was MinIO in Palo Alto, the open source cloud object storage company that uses containers and Kubernetes orchestration to better support cloud data and management.
MinIO is compatiblewith AWS S3 and S3 Select. The company says more than 750organisations, including Microsoft Azure, use its S3 Gateway. Whilethe open source software for managing data is free, like many opensource vendors MinIO makes its money through support and otherservices.
Basic support is,again, free. But if you want to get an answer to a problem within anhour from MinIOs engineers you pay for one of the companys SUBNETsupport subscriptions. These also include panic buttons thatmake all engineers around the time zones jump to customers urgentproblems to find a collective solution ASAP.
The SUBNET offering isnow being widely pushed globally, with ten SUBNET subscribers inEurope currently on the roster. It is hoped that the largest users ofMinIO, such as Apple located down the road in Cupertino, will paytheir way, considering the large amount of data they are said tohandle via MinIO.
After MinIO we visitedone of the Valleys most famous business hotels, the Rosewood inMenlo Park, where it is often packed out with venture capitalists,expensive cars and their potential clients looking for their earlyfunding.
Indeed, we were introduced to a very well known VC in the form of Peter Levine. He was originally at Veritas, and went on to XenSource, before it was acquired by Citrix. He is now a general partner at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, with his company an investor in the company we were there to see, multi-cloud data management firm Actifio.
Levine told us thatwhile software is eating the world, data was eatingsoftware. Actifio has a solution to this latter problem, it says.
It was at the Rosewoodto launch its latest 10c software, that is designed to turn a singledata lake into a source for accessible business insights usingthe cloud, containers and copy data. It boasts support for sevenpublic cloud platforms and 23 new core technologies.
Actifio CEO AshAshutosh said the firms largest contract is worth $35m with afinancial services company in the US, and that typical contractsstart at $250,000. So the solutions it sells certainly arent for theminnows.
The company is nowlooking for more technology partners and consulting channel partnersto build on the relationships it already has with the likes of IBMand Tata Consultancy Services.
As for the establishedheavyweights of cloud data management, the IT Press Tour also metCommvault and VMware.
At Commvault, press and analysts were presented with a pitch to explain what the New Commvault was after a busy year of changes. The company held its first Commvault GO event to get closer to customers and partners in Florida in 2016, when the stirrings of its first serious cloud break broke.
This may or not havebeen appropriate at the time, as the event was somewhat curtailed asa result of an impending hurricane, with this author and many otherdelegates choosing to fly home early to prevent being trapped in theresort.
Since then, the companyhas held three other Commvault GO events in the US that have not beenaffected by stormy weather, and the organisation seems to havecompleted putting its cloud strategy fully together, although itsreach is still limited more of this later.
In February 2019, thecompany appointed a new CEO. In July this year it launched a newpartner programme, and in September it acquired software-definedprimary and secondary storage management company Hedvig, which othervendors had had their eye on too as an acquisition target.
And in October, thefirm put the icing on the cake with the launch of Metallic, aSaaS-based cloud data management service. The company confirmed itwas committed to giving customers choice as to whether they wanted tobuy Commvault products and services via subscription, perpetual, SaaSor through service provider licenses and deals.
It is also determined to kill the notion that Commvault is mainly an expensive, big box data storage solution for only large companies a description that is still doing the rounds in the wider market. It is a description that Commvault probably started to try and seriously shake off back at Commvault GO 2016, but it wasnt shaking it off quick enough, which is probably partly why the previous senior management was changed this year.
With Hedvig andMetallic, Commvault chief marketing officer Chris Powell reckoned thevendors total addressible market had increased 60%.
Metallic provides coreback-up and recovery, Microsoft Office 365 backup and recovery andendpoint backup and recovery through cloud channel service providers.
But after an Octoberlaunch, it is still only available in the US, with the Commvault teamstill not able to say when it will be extended to any otherterritories. This will happen in 2020, but Commvault so far cannotconfirm whether this will be in the first half or the second half.
Ingram Micro and Arroware established Commvault distributors. Maybe there is an impendingannouncement on further Metallic availability outside the US throughdistributors and service providers, but it does seem rather strangethat a seemingly key product is not moving more quickly to market.
Over at VMware, there was a refresh of what had been launched at VMworld, including the Tanzu set of products to build, run and manage apps in a multi-cloud environment. But the firm was more keen to demonstrate the opportunities created from marrying together the cloud and hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI).
There are two marketsin HCI, the branded systems market and the software supplier one thatsees HCI software used by various brands. On the branded systemsside, Dell Technologies, Nutanix, Cisco, HPE and Lenovo were the topfive in that order in terms of global sales in the third quarter of2019, according to analyst IDC.
But when it comes tothe supply of HCI software, VMware is well ahead of the pack with 38%of the market, according to IDC, with Nutanix on 27.2% and DellTechnologies and Cisco both on under 6%.
Lee Caswell, VP ofmarketing for the VMware HCI business unit, said: Channel partnerswere initially pushing back on the HCI bet as they thought it reducedthe chance to sell more storage. But they are now taking advantage ofusing it to sell more services.
Caswell said that although the mid-range storage market was bigger, it was only expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 3% up to 2023. On the other hand, he said, the HCI market is expected to grow at a 20% CAGR over the same period.
Hot HCI rival Nutanixof course, along with others, is rushing to serve the samemulti-cloud environment that VMware is aiming to address with newproducts, and it is good to see other newer companies entering thespace too.
The IT Press Tour will be taking a visit to Israel next spring to see what start-ups and more established companies there are doing in the data space.
Read the original post:
Scale Computing says it was proved right on edge over cloud - Data Economy
Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market Growth Rate by 2026 Top Key Vendors, Trend, Segmentation, Drivers, Challenges and Forecast – Market…
Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market Overview:
The report titled Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market is one of the most comprehensive and important additions to Verified Market Research archive of market research studies. It offers detailed research and analysis of key aspects of the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market. The market analysts authoring this report have provided in-depth information on leading growth drivers, restraints, challenges, trends, and opportunities to offer a complete analysis of the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market. Market participants can use the analysis on market dynamics to plan effective growth strategies and prepare for future challenges beforehand. Each trend of the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market is carefully analyzed and researched about by the market analysts.
Global Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market was valued at USD 946.1 million in 2017 and is projected to reach USD 5,245.31 million by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 32.7% from 2018 to 2025.
The report includes detailed analysis of the vendor landscape and thorough company profiling of leading players of the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market.The researchers have considered almost all important parameters for company profiling, including market share, recent development, gross margin, future development plans, product portfolio, production, and revenue.
Get | Download Sample Copy @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/download-sample/?rid=4625&utm_source=MRS&utm_medium=002
Leading players covered in the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market report:
Insight into Competitive Landscape :
Market players need to have a complete picture of the competitive landscape of the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market as it forms an essential tool for them to plan their future strategies accordingly. The report puts forth the key sustainability strategies taken up by the companies and the impact they are likely to have on the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market competition. The report helps the competitors to capitalize on opportunities in the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market and cope up with the existing competition. This will eventually help them to make sound business decisions and generate maximum revenue.
Market Segment Analysis :
The report offers a comprehensive study of product type and application segments of the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market. The segmental analysis provided in the report is based on significant factors such as market share, market size, consumption, production, and growth rate of the market segments studied.Readers of the report are also provided with exhaustive geographical analysis to provide clear understanding of the regional growth of the Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science market. Developed as well as developing regional markets for Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science have been deeply studied to help market players identify profit-making opportunities in different regions and countries.
North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)
Asia Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines and Vietnam)
Middle East and Africa (Turkey, GCC Countries, Egypt and South Africa)
South America (Brazil and others)
Ask for Discount @https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=4625&utm_source=MRS&utm_medium=002
Table of Content
1 Introduction of Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market
1.1 Overview of the Market 1.2 Scope of Report 1.3 Assumptions
2 Executive Summary
3 Research Methodology of Verified Market Research
3.1 Data Mining 3.2 Validation 3.3 Primary Interviews 3.4 List of Data Sources
4 Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market Outlook
4.1 Overview 4.2 Market Dynamics 4.2.1 Drivers 4.2.2 Restraints 4.2.3 Opportunities 4.3 Porters Five Force Model 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
5 Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market, By Deployment Model
5.1 Overview
6 Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market, By Solution
6.1 Overview
7 Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market, By Vertical
7.1 Overview
8 Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market, By Geography
8.1 Overview 8.2 North America 8.2.1 U.S. 8.2.2 Canada 8.2.3 Mexico 8.3 Europe 8.3.1 Germany 8.3.2 U.K. 8.3.3 France 8.3.4 Rest of Europe 8.4 Asia Pacific 8.4.1 China 8.4.2 Japan 8.4.3 India 8.4.4 Rest of Asia Pacific 8.5 Rest of the World 8.5.1 Latin America 8.5.2 Middle East
9 Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market Competitive Landscape
9.1 Overview 9.2 Company Market Ranking 9.3 Key Development Strategies
10 Company Profiles
10.1.1 Overview 10.1.2 Financial Performance 10.1.3 Product Outlook 10.1.4 Key Developments
11 Appendix
11.1 Related Research
Complete Report is Available @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/global-cloud-computing-iaas-in-life-science-market-size-and-forecast-to-2025/?utm_source=MRS&utm_medium=002
We also offer customization on reports based on specific client requirement:
1- Free country level analysis for any 5 countries of your choice.
2- Free Competitive analysis of any market players.
3- Free 40 analyst hours to cover any other data points
About Us:
Verified market research partners with clients to provide insight into strategic and growth analytics; data that help achieve business goals and targets. Our core values include trust, integrity, and authenticity for our clients.
Analysts with high expertise in data gathering and governance utilize industry techniques to collate and examine data at all stages. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, subject expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research reports.
Contact Us:
Mr. Edwyne Fernandes Call: +1 (650) 781 4080 Email: [emailprotected]
This post was originally published on Market Research Sheets
Go here to read the rest:
Cloud computing IaaS in Life Science Market Growth Rate by 2026 Top Key Vendors, Trend, Segmentation, Drivers, Challenges and Forecast - Market...
Global Cloud Computing Industry Emerging Trends and Prospects by leading Players Yahoo Inc. CISCO Systems, IBM Co., Hewlett Packard, Dell Inc. -…
The Latest Research Report published by Global Reports Store on Cloud Computing Industry Forecast 2019-2025. Which contains 120 Pages, 80 Figures, and Tables, With a detailed description of past, present, and future of Cloud Computing Industry along with 15 Companies detailed profile analysis. The global Cloud Computing industry valued approximately USD 209.9 billion in 2016 is anticipated to grow with a healthy growth rate of more than 17.93% over the forecast period 2019-2025.
Ask For Sample Of This Report: https://www.globalreportsstore.com/request-sample/13633
The major driver for this industry is the cost-effectiveness. This service of cloud computing helps various organizations to save up to one-third of their annual operations costs. Also, the rising number of SMEs will bolster the use of cloud services. The objective of the study is to define Industry sizes of different segments & countries in previous years and to forecast the values for the next eight years. The report is designed to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the industry with respect to each of the regions and countries involved in the study. Furthermore, the report also caters the detailed information about the crucial aspects such as drivers & restraining factors which will define the future growth of the Industry. Additionally, it will also incorporate the opportunities available in micro Industries for stakeholders to invest, detailed analysis of competitive landscape and product offerings of key players.
Market Player in Cloud Computing Industry:Yahoo Inc.CISCO SystemsIBM Co.Hewlett PackardDell Inc.Akamai TechnologiesVM WareMicrosoft CorporationAmazon Web Services
Market Segmentation:By Service:Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)Platform as a Service (PaaS)Software as a Service (SaaS)
By Deployment Model:Public CloudPrivate CloudHybrid Cloud
By Organization Size:Small & Medium Size Enterprises (SMEs)Large Enterprises
By End-User:Telecommunications & IT (ICT)HealthcareRetailPublic SectorMedia & EntertainmentBanking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)
By RegionNorth America (USA, Canada)Europe (Germany, U.K., France, Italy, Rest of Europe)APAC (China, India, Japan, Rest of Asia-Pacific)RoW (Latin America, Middle East & Africa)
Buy This Research Report at 2900 USD Only(Report Will Be Delivered only in 2 Days): https://www.globalreportsstore.com/checkout/13633
High lite Form This Research Report:1 Business Overview: An exhaustive description of the companies operation and business divisions.2 Corporate Strategy: Analysts summarisation of the companies business strategy.3 SWOT Analysis: A detail analysis of company Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threats.4 Company History: Progression of key events associated with the company.5 Major Products and Services: A list of major Products, Services, and Brands of the company.6 Key Competitors: A list of key competitors to the company.7 Important Locations and subsidiaries: a list and contact details of key locations and subsidiaries of the company.
Table of Contents Major Key PointsChapter 1: Executive summaryChapter 2: Scope of the reportChapter 3: Market research methodologyChapter 4: IntroductionChapter 5: Market landscapeChapter 6: Market segmentation by productChapter 7: Key leading countriesChapter 8: Market driversChapter 9: Impact of drivers
Contact Us:Manager [Business Development]Global Reports StoreUSA+1- 618-310-3972IND +91- 739-102-4425[emailprotected]
This post was originally published on Market Research Sheets
Cloud computing in 2020: views of the industry – Techerati
We asked six industry experts to weigh in on whats now and whats next in cloud computing
When we published our selection of cloud predictions last year, most predicted container orchestrator Kubernetes to consolidate its stranglehold over the container space and, correspondingly, modern cloud infrastructure.
Last November, one of the most extensive customer surveys bore this prediction out. In its study of thousands of companies, cloud and infrastructure monitoring company Datadog found 45 percent of its customers were using Kubernetes. And if that isnt evidence enough, just reflect on VMwares announcement in March that it plans to transition its enterprise virtualisation platform to a system that runs (and runs on) Kubernetes.
But in reality, Kubernetes centrality to cloud was put beyond doubt weeks before we published last years roundup. In January, IBM steamrollered into 2019 fresh off the back of its $34 billion acquisition of Red Hat. This year IBM confirmed it would integrate Red Hats popular Kubernetes implementation, OpenShift, into a new multi-cloud business focus.
It is in this context that most of this years experts consulted their cloud crystal balls. Rackspaces Lee James predicts 2020 to be a year of stiff competition between enterprise IT giants jostling to deliver a Kubernetes solution that unlocks multi-cloud for their customers. On the other hand, Stephan Fabel of Canonical says end-users will start to understand the limitations of Kubernetes, and accordingly, utilise it more strategically. Lastly, Pivotals Michael Cote expects companies to use this new-found savoir-faire to establish a singular, overall Kubernetes strategy.
Read the predictions in their entirety below.
Hybrid becomes the new multi-cloud, again
While the popularity of multi-cloud is undisputed with 81 per cent of companies using cloud technologies in some way, many firms are still making investments in their private cloud solutions. This is due to a number of reasons, such as the security posture, ongoing data centre leasing, or just because its the best platform for the application in some cases business. Indeed, even the UK Government plans to revise its cloud first policy to cloud right (or something similar) early next year, acknowledging that public cloud isnt right for everyone or every use case.
Reflecting this trend, weve seen the cloud giants respond with private cloud solutions that link directly into their public cloud solutions, such as Azure Arc, Google Cloud Anthos and AWS Outposts.
In 2020, theres going to be significant competition between the three biggest cloud hyperscalers and VMware as they all explore and deliver on how Kubernetes will unlock their potential to be the multi hybrid cloud provider of choice for customers. For customers, its ultimately going to come down to which fits and works best, as well as what gives the best bang for their buck. But this sets us up for an exciting year of new product and service announcements as each of the major cloud companies try to establish themselves as the cloud broker of choice.
Unicorn start-ups will begin repatriating workloads from the cloud
There has been a lot said about cloud repatriation of late. While this wont be a mass exodus from the cloud in fact quite the opposite, with public cloud growth expected to increase 2020 will see cloud native organisations leveraging a hybrid environment to enjoy greater cost savings.
For businesses starting out or working with limited budgets, which require an environment for playing around with the latest technology, public cloud is the perfect place to start. With the public cloud, you are your own limit and get immediate reward for innovation. But as these costs begin mounting, its prudent to consider how to regain control of cloud economics.
Repatriating workloads to on-premise is certainly a viable option, but it doesnt mean to say that we will start to see the decline of cloud. As organisations get past each new milestone in the development process, repatriation becomes more and more of a challenge. What we will likely see is public cloud providers reaching into the data centre to support this hybrid demand, so that they can capitalise on the trend
Kubernetes has become an integral part of modern cloud infrastructure and serves as a gateway to building and experimenting with new technology. Its little surprise that many companies we observe are doubling down on the application and reorienting their DevOps team around it to explore new things such as enabling serverless applications and automating data orchestration. We think this trend will continue at strength in 2020.
On a more cautious note, we may also see some companies questioning whether Kubernetes is really the correct tool for their purposes. While the technology can provide tremendous value, in some cases it can be complex to manage and requires specialist skills.
As Kubernetes is now commonly being used for production at scale, it becomes increasingly likely that users encounter issues around security and downtime. As a result of these challenges, we can expect the community will mature and in some cases come to the viewpoint that it might not be right for every application or increase the need to bring in outsourced vendors to aid with specialised expertise.
Organisations should try to find one standard Kubernetes approach
Kubernetes has already emerged as the leading choice for running containerised or cloud native applications. Organisations will now spend the time to create a kubernetes strategy, choosing the distro or services theyll use, to then run a few applications on it. Having multiple initiatives here would be a huge waste and delay the overall strategy. Instead organisations should try to find one standard Kubernetes approach. In 2020, though, the bulk of the work will be finding and modernising the apps that will run on that platform.
Most large organisations are doing just that and will spend 2020 modernising how they build and run software. To start, they need to find a handful of small, high value applications and the services those applications use. Then, run a working Proof of Concept (POC) to validate the platform choice by launching actual applications on the platform.
If it goes well, organisations can then put more apps on it. If it doesnt go well, they can try to find out why and try again, maybe with a new platform. Its important to look at the full end-to-end process: from development, to running in production, to re-deploying companies need to judge the success of the platform choice.
All applications will become mission-critical
The number of applications that businesses classify as mission-critical will rise during 2020 paving the way to a landscape in which every app is considered a high-priority. Previously, organizations have been prepared to distinguish between mission-critical apps and non-mission-critical apps. As businesses become completely reliant on their digital infrastructure, the ability to make this distinction becomes very difficult.
On average, the 2019 Veeam Cloud Data Management report revealed that IT decision-makers say their business can tolerate a maximum of two hours downtime of mission-critical apps. But what apps can any enterprise realistically afford to have unavailable for this amount of time? Application downtime costs organisations a total of $20.1 million globally in lost revenue and productivity each year, with lost data from mission-critical apps costing an average of $102,450 per hour. The truth is that every app is critical.
Businesses will continue to pick and choose the storage technologies and hardware that work best for their organisation, but data centre management will become even more about software. Manual provisioning of IT infrastructure is fast-becoming a thing of the past. Infrastructure as Code (IaC) will continue its proliferation into mainstream consciousness. Allowing business to create a blueprint of what infrastructure should do, then deploy it across all storage environments and locations, IaC reduces the time and cost of provisioning infrastructure across multiple sites.
Software-defined approaches such as IaC and Cloud-Native a strategy which natively utilises services and infrastructure from cloud computing providers are not all about cost though. Automating replication procedures and leveraging the public cloud offers precision, agility and scalability enabling organisations to deploy applications with speed and ease. With over three-quarters of organisations using software-as-a-service (SaaS), a software-defined approach to data management is now relevant to the vast majority of businesses.
Companies will take a step down from the cloud
The pattern goes something like this: lift and shift infrastructure VMs to the cloud, see costs actually go up, then move some workloads back to on-prem, then application lifecycle drivers push new apps (or new features for old apps) to be built in the cloud using PaaS/DbaaS technologies with more favourable cost model, then retire old IaaS apps. The key takeaway is this dynamic is one of the drivers for hybrid approaches.
We saw many companies this past year lift and shift to the cloud. Now, in 2020, I expect well see companies take a step back, and reevaluate their all-in approach. After feeling the effects of the full shift to cloud, the high associated costs and lack of flexibility, many companies will likely move to a multi-cloud or hybrid cloud approach next year.
Taking a hybrid cloud approach enables organizations to leverage the cloud (using AWS, Azure, or GCP) for some applications and computing needs while still keeping mission-critical or sensitive data closer to home. With a multi-cloud strategy, organizations can reduce costs and, instead of being constrained to one cloud, departments have the flexibility to select the service that works best for their individual needs (using a mix of AWS, Azure, or GCP).
Customers and organisations will really begin to look for more management layers on top of their solutions
One of the things I believe well see in 2020 is the true adoption of things like hybrid and multi-cloud solutions but the difference in this upcoming year will be that customers and organisations will really begin to look for more management layers on top of their solutions.
A lot of companies already have things like backup-in-the-cloud and DRaaS somewhere else, so what theyre now looking for is a uniform management layer on top of that to give visibility on cost, as well as a knowledge of where all data is located. Its important to know where data lives, whether workloads are protected, and whether they need to move workloads between different clouds if and when requirements change.
Go here to read the rest:
Cloud computing in 2020: views of the industry - Techerati
Cloud Computing and Security: The Risks You Need to Know – TechDecisions
Cloud computing has become a valuable and increasingly popular approach to digital technology that includes on-demand self-service, broad network access, software as a service, and much, much more. As businesses continue to explore cloud options for a number of applications, its critical that they assess and align specific needs with the appropriate cloud vendor and service early in the cloud transition. Misaligning them, or underestimating cloud computing risks can spell trouble.
Clouds platforms and services available from technology giants including IBM, Google, Amazon, Salesforce, SAP and Oracle provide formats of IT service that offer users significant advantages over old-school, on-premises data centers.
For example, the users capital costs are lower and better matched to actual consumption; no hardware or software installations are required. Cloud-based IT infrastructure provides customers with rapid access to computing power whenever its needed.
Beyond that, the most significant misconception is that cloud services are protected 24/7 armies of security experts, making them virtually bullet-proof. That vision of an unimpregnable fortress, safeguarding client data against all adversaries, is comforting but its misguided.
Using cloud services actually carries its own set of risks risks that are unique to the cloud providers own operating environment, as well as other risks associated with traditional data centers.
Clients who dont recognize those risks and accept their own responsibilities for mitigating them, are almost as likely to experience data loss and compromise as they were before migrating to cloud operations.
Understanding and managing these shared cloud computing risks is key to successfully utilizing a cloud service. And it is equally important to recognize the cloud is not a monolithic concept; clouds vary both in who can use them and in what they do.
For one thing, just as in meteorological cloud formations, there are also different computing cloud configurations.
They include private clouds, which are hosted internally and used by a single organization; public clouds, which are commercial ventures available to the general public; community clouds which are only accessible to specific groups of users, and hybrid clouds which include elements of two or more such arrangements.
Cloud platforms and services are owned and operated by different companies, each with their own policies, prices, and resources.
There are also differences in the types of computing services they offer. Infrastructure as a Service, or IaaS, controls user access to computing resources servers, storage, network and so on which are actually owned by the client.
Platform as a Service, or PaaS, controls user access to the operating software and services needed to develop new applications.
The third and most popular cloud operations product is Software as a Service, or SaaS, which gives users direct access to the clients software applications.
For example, once theyre migrated to the cloud, client organizations lose a good amount of visibility and control over their assets and operations.
The monitoring and analysis of information about the companys applications, services, data and users never loses importance, but it will need to take a different form than it did when the clients own network monitoring and logging procedures were in place.
Before a clients data ever gets to the cloud, it travels across the internet. Unless the users network and internet channel are secure, powered by strong authentication standards and encrypted data, information in transit is susceptible to exposure.
Vulnerabilities in shared servers and system software used by public clouds to keep the data of multiple tenants separate can be exploited, enabling an attacker to access one organizations data via a separate organization and/or user.
Permanently removing sensitive data that a client wants securely deleted is difficult to confirm because of the reduced visibility inherent in cloud operations, which frequently includes data distributed over an assortment of storage devices. Any residual data can become available to attackers.
If a cloud service provider goes out of business or fails to meet your business and/or security needs, transferring data from that operator to another can be more costly in terms of time, effort and money than it was to initially become a subscriber. Additionally, each providers non-standard and proprietary tools can complicate data transfer.
Cloud operations are complicated by their technology, polices and their implementation methods. This complexity requires the clients IT staff to learn new ways of handling their information, because as complexity grows, so does the potential for a data breach.
Insider abuse has the potential to inflict even greater damage on the clients data than it did before due to the clouds ability to provide users with more access to more resources. Depending on your cloud service, the forensic capabilities needed to trace and detect any malicious insider may not be available.
The loss of stored data due to an accidental deletion or a physical catastrophe such as a fire or earthquake, can be permanent. A well thought out data recovery strategy needs to be in place, but the client and service provider must work together to establish a secure and effective process.
Managing user identities carefully controlling users identity attributes and regulating their privileged access remains an equally challenging task in cloud operations as it ever was in on-premises environments. Due to the nature of cloud services, the challenge in some cases can be much greater than in on-premises environments.
Providing appropriate levels of secure access for different user roles, such as employees, contractors and partners is critical to protecting your cloud environment, making Identity Governance a high priority when migrating to the cloud. Cloud computing and security should constantly be thought of as joined concepts, not separate silos.
Read Next:Getting the Most Out of Enterprise Content Management Software
Cloud operations provide a variety of valuable avenues to exploit. And while the childlike faith that cloud platforms and services are immune to malicious attacks may be touching, its simply not true. Vigilance is equally, if not even more important, than it was before migrating to the cloud.
See more here:
Cloud Computing and Security: The Risks You Need to Know - TechDecisions
Cloud Computing Security: Agencies Increased Their Use of the Federal Authorization Program, but Improved Oversight and Implementation Are Needed -…
What GAO Found
The 24 federal agencies GAO surveyed reported using the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) for authorizing cloud services. From June 2017 to July 2019, the number of authorizations granted through FedRAMP by the 24 agencies increased from 390 to 926, a 137 percent increase. However, 15 agencies reported that they did not always use the program for authorizing cloud services. For example, one agency reported that it used 90 cloud services that were not authorized through FedRAMP and the other 14 agencies reported using a total of 157 cloud services that were not authorized through the program. In addition, 31 of 47 cloud service providers reported that during fiscal year 2017, agencies used providers' cloud services that had not been authorized through FedRAMP. Although the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) required agencies to use the program, it did not effectively monitor agencies' compliance with this requirement. Consequently, OMB may have less assurance that cloud services used by agencies meet federal security requirements.
Four selected agencies did not consistently address key elements of the FedRAMP authorization process (see table). Officials at the agencies attributed some of these shortcomings to a lack of clarity in the FedRAMP guidance.
Agency Implementation of Key Elements of the FedRAMP Authorization Process
HHS
GSA
EPA
USAID
Element
Control implementation summaries identified security control responsibilities
Security plans addressed required information on control implementation
Security assessment reports summarized results of control tests
Remedial action plans addressed required information
Cloud service authorizations prepared and provided to FedRAMP Program Office
Legend: fully addressed the element partially addressed the element
FedRAMP = Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program; HHS = Department of Health and Human Services; GSA = General Services Administration; EPA = Environmental Protection Agency; USAID = U.S. Agency for International Development
Source: GAO analysis of agency documentation| GAO-20-126
Program participants identified several benefits, but also noted challenges with implementing the FedRAMP. For example, almost half of the 24 agencies reported that the program had improved the security of their data. However, participants reported ongoing challenges with resources needed to comply with the program. GSA took steps to improve the program, but its FedRAMP guidance on requirements and responsibilities was not always clear and the program's process for monitoring the status of security controls over cloud services was limited. Until GSA addresses these challenges, agency implementation of the program's requirements will likely remain inconsistent.
Federal agencies use internet-based (cloud) services to fulfill their missions. GSA manages FedRAMP, which provides a standardized approach to ensure that cloud services meet federal security requirements. OMB requires agencies to use FedRAMP to authorize the use of cloud services.
GAO was asked to review FedRAMP. The objectives were to determine the extent to which 1) federal agencies used FedRAMP to authorize cloud services, 2) selected agencies addressed key elements of the program's authorization process, and 3) program participants identified FedRAMP benefits and challenges. GAO analyzed survey responses from 24 federal agencies and 47 cloud service providers. GAO also reviewed policies, plans, procedures, and authorization packages for cloud services at four selected federal agencies and interviewed officials from federal agencies, the FedRAMP program office, and OMB.
GAO is making one recommendation to OMB to enhance oversight, two to GSA to improve guidance and monitoring, and 22 to the selected agencies, including GSA. GSA and HHS agreed with the recommendations, USAID generally agreed, EPA generally disagreed, and OMB neither agreed nor disagreed. GAO revised four recommendations and withdrew one based on new information provided; it maintains that the remaining recommendations are warranted.
For more information, contact Gregory C. Wilshusen at (202) 512-6244 or wilshuseng@gao.gov.
See the original post:
Cloud Computing Security: Agencies Increased Their Use of the Federal Authorization Program, but Improved Oversight and Implementation Are Needed -...