Ive been an Apple guy sinceforever. I bought the very first Macintosh back in 1984. My current mobile technology line-up is a 15-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar, 11-inch MacBook Air (now just a backup Mac), 9.7-inch iPad Pro and an iPhone SE. Im all-in on Apple, and the ecosystem is a large part of that. Things may not always Just Work, but the Apple ecosystem gets closer to that than anyone else.

However, while I do make some use of iCloud, Im not all-in on Apples cloud storage. In this piece, I compare the main cloud services out there, and finallydescribe the mix-and-match approach I use to get what I consider to be the best of all worlds

There are, of course, an almost infinite number of players out there. Some of the smaller services have their benefits and their fans, but Im focusing here on the major players for one crucial reason: you dont want to entrust your data to a company that may be here today, gone tomorrow. Cloud storage is one area where I only trust the big boys because they arentgoing to disappear overnight.

You could argue that Google Drive might be an exception. The company is notorious for launching services with much fanfare and then quietly shuttering them some way down the line. ButGoogle isnt going to risk its reputation by closing a core service, and one for which migrating services would be a major hassle.

Another reason to stick to major services is we can be confident in their fallback plans. Smaller services may have super-robust backup regimes, but I wouldnt rely on this. The big companies haveextensive mirroring systems.

That doesnt mean any of them are infallible. You should never depend on any cloud service as your sole backup. But the big four will be a safer bet than a smaller company.

Im also excludingAmazon Drive,because it forces you to use its own top-level directory structure (Documents, Pictures, Videos) rather than allowing you to mirror or choose your own, and because its Mac and iOS apps suck.

Lets start withApples own offering, iCloud.

Monthlypricing

Pros

iCloud is the obvious solution to anyone who exclusively uses Apple kit. In principle, it meets the Just Works criteria: activate it on all your devices, and you get easy access to all your data from calendar, notes and photos through to iWork documents. Your iOS devices also get automatically backed-up to iCloud at the flick of a virtual switch. It requires no setup, no effort. You also a bigger range of storage tier options than other services, from 50GB at the lower end to 2TB at the top end.

Cons

If you need the 1TB option, which is the most likely tier for those making substantial use of cloud storage, iCloud is a little more expensive than most competitors given that Apple offers no discounted annual subscription. iCloud seems to suffer more outages than competing services, and can be glitchy. At the trivial end of the scale, it can take several minutes for a new file or edit on one device to show up on others; at the more serious end, it can cause chaos if you have more than one Mac with different sized drives. Finally, iCloud is clunky to use from non-Apple devices.

In my view, the service against which all others must be compared.

Monthlypricing

Pros

For me, the crucial benefit of Dropbox is speed and reliability. Ive tried all the main services over the years, and Dropbox has always been 100% reliable and has consistentlysynced within seconds. Thats a killer feature right there, in my view. Its also really easy to use just create a Dropbox folder and drag-and-drop things into it. If you want your entire Mac online, just put all your document folders inside your Dropbox folder, and they will then be available locally and in the cloud. Dropbox also provides a really easy way to share both files and folders with people:simply copy them into your public folder and right-click to get a link you can share via email or IM.

Cons

There are no storage tiers between the free 2GB and the $9.99/month 1TB level though you can earn extra storage through referrals. There are no real-time collaboration tools.

A no-brainer place to store your iPhone photo backups.

Monthlypricing

Pros

Google Drive gives you a generous 15GB free, and it also adds unlimited free storage for your Google Docs, Sheets and Slides files and supports real-time collaboration on these. It also offers a maximum storage tier of a massive 10TB though at a much stiffer price than Dropboxs $20/user/month for unlimited storage.

But the killer feature of Google Drive is that you get completely free storage of photos up to 16MP. That means that you can store absolutely all of youriPhone and iPad photosin full resolution completely free of charge! Use the Google Photosapp to automatically backup photos to Google Drive and you dont even have to think about it. You also get unlimited free storage of videos, but only at 1080p, not 4K.

Cons

The main drawback of Google Drive and the reason I rejected it as my own primary cloud storage service is that uploads are slow. It doesnt matter how fast your broadband connection, files just drag themselves onto the drive reluctantly. Single files are no problem, but as soon as you find yourself uploading a whole folder of larger files, be prepared to wait a while.

As youd expect, this is primarily aimed at Windows and Office users.

Monthlypricing

Pros

If youre an Office user who likes to have ongoing access to the latest versions, OneDrive is a bargain offeringa free Office 365 subscription for less than competing services charge for their 1TB tier without freebies. It also offers real-time collaboration on Office documents.

Cons

Office is only licensed for a single Mac, iPad and iPhone, so youre out of luck if you use more than one of any of these. Also,although your OneDrive documents are available to multiple devices, if you accidentally delete one, you can only retrieve it from the device on which you deleted it so not idealfor those who work from one device at home and another while mobile. Neither Mac nor iOS apps are great. Really, this is a service designed for Windows users and it feels like it.

I have a 50GB iCloud account, and use iCloud for my core services. My calendar and notes are on iCloud, and I greatly value having (mostly) seamless access to these between devices.I use Messages and FaceTime as my primary chat and audio/video call apps. I also use iCloud as the primary backup for my iPhone and iPad, though I also do occasional encrypted backups to iTunes, especially before upgrading devices.

I use Google Photos to automatically backup my photos. I have the Google Photos app running on all my devices iPhone, iPad and Mac and find it fantastic to have unlimited storage free of charge. To me, this is an absolute n0-brainer.

But my primary cloud storage service is a 1TB Dropbox account. On my Mac, my Dropbox sits at the top-level in my account folder, and everything else is stored in sub-folders within this. This means that all of my documents and media are available to me on any device, including on the web.Ive used it for several years now, and as I said earlier, have found it 100% reliable and super-fast to sync.

Finally, Im a huge believer in belt-and-braces. When Im working on something important, like a novel, I copy it to multiple places. It already sits on Dropbox automatically, but I also make manual copies toiCloud and to my (free) Google Drive account.

What about you? Do share your own approach to cloud services in the comments.

Top image: Dollarphotoclub

Read more from the original source:
Cloud services compared, or why I'm all-in on Apple but not on iCloud - 9 to 5 Mac

Avere, the filer and public cloud storage accelerator supplier, has scored a $27m E-round of funding, with Google proper providing some of the funds.

Avere, founded in 2008, accelerates access to files in NAS arrays by using a multi-tiered media approach and treating different IO types, such as read and write, sequential and random, differently so as to optimise the system for faster accesses.

There was participation from existing investors - Menlo Ventures, Norwest Venture Partners, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Tenaya Capital and Western Digital Technologies - as well as its new investor, Google Inc, which notably did not invest through its funding arm, GV (Google Ventures).

Initially the amount was reported as $14m but, after the initial funding announcement was made, there was an additional amount added to the round by the investors, bringing it up to $27m.

The company says it wants to use the new funds to drive product innovation and help expand its hybrid cloud product offerings.

CEO, president and co-founder Ron Bianchini said: In 2016 alone, Avere has grown its cloud business by 97 per cent, nearly doubling growth from the previous year, and closed the year with cloud offerings driving close to half of our annual bookings.

The 11-year-old firm developed its technology to run in remote and branch offices, also to front-end public cloud storage, and then extended its software to run in the public cloud.

The company sees its customers using a mix of on-premises (private) and public cloud storage and compute facilities; its a hybrid world as far as it is concerned.

It received a $15m A-round in 2009, a $17m B-round in 2010, a $20m C-round in 2012, and another $20m in a 2014 D-round. With the latest E-round, total funding is now $97m.

We asked Bianchini some questions around the new funding.

El Reg: How far away is profitability?

Ron Bianchini: Our current forecast show us reaching profitability in 2018.

El Reg: What are the features of the hybrid cloud (in more detail than the release) that you will be using the E-round funding for?

Ron Bianchini: We're not ready to discuss new cloud products at this time; however, big areas of continued focus for us are ease of deployment within the public cloud and further in-cloud performance and scalability enhancements.

El Reg: Will you aim to take advantage of 3D Xpoint and possibly other storage-class memory media in your products? Where would such media fit in your existing media tiers in your hardware?

Ron Bianchini: It is not on the roadmap at this time, but we like to think of our architecture as storage media agnostic. When one type of media has outlived its usefulness, there is no technical reason why it can't or shouldn't be replaced with something better.

El Reg: What public clouds do you support, which are on the roadmap? What protocols will be used to access them?

Ron Bianchini: We support Google, AWS and Azure (bursting only). No others are currently on the roadmap - these three representing more than 90 per cent market share of public cloud spend. We use S3 to access the storage portion of the cloud and NAS protocols for cloudbursting.

El Reg: Do you have a multi-cloud strategy, with your customers able to use two or more public clouds simultaneously?

Ron Bianchini: Yes, this is one of the strengths of an Avere solution, to provide customers the ability to mirror storage between clouds with our FlashMirror product. This is a popular feature for customers who want to avoid lock-in to a single cloud provider.

El Reg: Any Internet of Things edge device interest from Avere?

Ron Bianchini: We are interested in supporting any devices that speak the same protocol language as we do.

Fishing for new product info in Averes pool is a pretty unrewarding pastime. Our thinking is that $27m is a healthy dose of cash and that some of it will fund software development to enhance the in-cloud products performance and scalability.

We also think that on-premises FXT kit will get easier interaction with the public cloud, but it doesn't take a genius to work that out.

Read more:
Google and pals plough $27m into tiery-eyed storage startup Avere - The Register

Storj Labs has announced that it is planning on moving its blockchain-based cloud storage network from its current Counterparty protocol over to the Ethereum blockchain.

The Atlanta-based company announced in a blog post that one of the reasons for the planned move is due to current issues with the bitcoins blockchain transaction backlog and long transaction times. The Counterparty smart token platform runs on top of the bitcoin blockchain. Additionally, the fees that Storj have to pay are no longer sustainable.

In the blog post, Shawn Wilkinson, CEO and CTO of Storj Labs, said:

Counterparty transactions create small inputs and are heavier than normal BTC transactions, [so] users have experienced extremely high fees for transactions. For the February farmer output we paid over $1,600 in transaction fees, or about 10 percent of total payouts. This is not sustainable or scalable.

Wilkinson cited the lack of Counterparty growth as a concern with no major updates in more than two years while its interface was confusing for new users. However, its believed that the Ethereum platform will provide the answer.

Wilkinson commented on Ethereums ERC20 token, suggesting that Storjs SJCX token could be migrated over to Ethereums standard token. While the progress of its future layer two solutions such as Raiden are promising and support ERC20 tokens.

He added:

ERC20 tokens have been issued by a number of prominent projects including Augur and Golem, and have wide support in the Ethereum development community.

After the news that Storj Labs would be moving its platform to the Ethereum blockchain, the SJCX/BTC exchange rate increased to a four-month high.

According to a report from Razor Forex, Storj tokens were priced at around 0.000206 bitcoins; however, that price has since dropped to about 0.00019013, according to CoinMarketCap.

However, it indicates a sign that those in support of Storj Labs are in favor of such a move to the Ethereum blockchain, which in turn will further help the community to grow than it is doing at present.

For now, initial steps have been taken to migrate Storj Labs away from the Counterparty protocol, but a date as to when this will happen is yet to be released from Wilkinson.

In February, Storj Labs announced that it had raised $3 million in seed funding with early backers including those of Google Ventures, Ionic Security, Cockroach Labs, and Qualcomm Ventures and Techstars.

Featured image from Shutterstock.

View original post here:
Storj to Migrate Cloud Storage Service to Ethereum Blockchain from Counterparty over Bitcoin - CryptoCoinsNews

Source: Thinkstock

March 27, 2017 -As health IT infrastructure becomes more advanced, organizations are adopting big data analytics incentives, mobile and Internet of Things (IoT) devices collecting information that needs to be stored. As Charged with the task of managing more data, they struggle to scale traditional on-premise solutions to meet the demands of structured and unstructured clinical data.

Cloud storage solutions in healthcare allow facilities to expand and scale their IT infrastructures to meet the demands set by advanced analytics and connected medical devices to decrease overall costs and save on space needed to house physical servers.

Based on market reports from Global Industry Analysts, MarketsandMarkets, and Reportbuyer, HITInfrastructure.com presents the following list of top healthcare cloud storage companies and how they meet specific healthcare needs.

AWS Amazon Web Services (AWS) focuses on helping healthcare providers deliver efficient, quality care to patients through reducing the time needed to run existing workloads and providing access to useful analytics capabilities. AWS also prioritizes meeting all security and privacy requirements. The cloud storage vendor gives providers access to archiving solutions and allows hospitals to store backup servers in the cloud to save space. AWS also eases information security by managing over 1800 security controls and grants providers access to the right resources through technology and consulting partners useful for a variety of applications. AWS also collaborates with other cloud vendors including VMware to offer organizations options for public and private cloud deployments.

Microsoft Azure Microsoft Azure is one of the most widely used healthcare cloud providers. The collection of integrated cloud services offers healthcare organizations solutions ranging from the Internet of Things (IoT) to big data and analytics. Microsoft Azure equips providers with the necessary tools to engage patients, empower care teams, and optimize clinical and operational effectiveness. The cloud provider also offers services to care coordination, clinical analytics, remote patient monitoring, and clinical analysis.

Dell EMC Dell EMC Secure Healthcare Cloud offers HIPAA-compliant security and disaster recovery. The cloud provider hosts applications, and assists users in building a private cloud or integrating Dells solutions into their existing infrastructure. Dell is focused on building users a secure healthcare cloud equipped with administrative, physical and technical controls to fulfill the requirements of clinical data management. Offering a range of features such as a logically partitioned network, computer and storage layers, single sign-on and secure messaging, Dell EMC has a consistent record of matching healthcare provider needs with secure solutions.

Google Cloud Platform Google Cloud Platform offers evolving infrastructure with big data and analytics capabilities through a focus on developing code over configuring servers. Google Cloud Platform strives to meet stringent security, and compliance controls, including HIPAA, so healthcare organizations can trust their infrastructure meets all relevant regulations. The cloud provider offers a variety of products including cloud storage and databases, cloud virtual networks, and a cloud machine learning engine.

IBM IBM supplies healthcare organizations with the necessary tools and technology to deliver quality patient care using a cloud service with apps and services integrated with cognitive and analytics capabilities for valuable insights. IBM offers a variety of secure, scalable, private cloud options available in more than 45 data centers worldwide. The cloud platform integrates DevOps tools to accelerate the development and delivery of web and mobile services. To help providers with the inundation of healthcare data they deal with each day, IBM provides services including the IoT to promote improved patient care and health outcomes.

ClearDATA ClearDATA prioritizes healthcare security and managing sensitive healthcare data through compliance and security safeguards, healthcare expertise, and DevOps automation. ClearDATA equips healthcare providers with the tools to deal with the large volume of data and analysis involved in population health management, the transition from volume-based care to value-based reimbursement, and the complex regulations setting expectations for coding, reimbursement, PHI protection, and quality of care.

Intel Intel specializes in facilitating workflows and customized treatments in clinical and distributed care settings using data analytics and clinical decision support. Intel also provides resources for mobile healthcare teams for consolidating patient data and transferring patient information wirelessly before the patient arrives onsite.

Rackspace Rackspace, soon partnering with Google, specializes in managing the worlds leading clouds, with technical and professional certifications to manage a variety of cloud providers including AWS. One of Rackspaces premiere features is Openstacka way for users to manage containerized, virtualized, and bare metal applications across public, private, and hybrid clouds using a single standard set of APIs.

Iron Mountain Iron Mountain, Iron Mountains information management solutions specialize in records management, information destruction, and data backup and recovery. Iron Mountains scalable portfolio of health IT management solutions focus on accelerating user EHR transitions and reduce their hybrid period. The cloud provider helps manage clinical and business solutions for over 2,000 hospitals, meeting HIPAA security compliance requirements and storing electronic health information in offsite underground data centers.

SAP SAP provides software for healthcare providers to aid with patient care delivery, care collaboration, healthcare analytics and research, and platform and technology. SAPs analytics and real-time health IT platform helps healthcare providers with integrated patient access to information and health data exchange. SAP solutions specialize in enabling information exchange, managing risk and compliance, and personalizing healthcare and patient engagement.

Read more:
Top 10 Cloud Data Storage Companies - HITInfrastructure.com (blog)

When you decide to start using a cloud storage or online backup provider, you may have some worries about security: weve all seen the sensational headlines about starlets having naked pictures of themselves stolen from their online accounts. The power that the U.S. Senate has recently granted to ISPs may also inspire worry.

However, with proper security measures, your stored files can be just as safe in the cloud as they are on your laptop if not safer. In this article well talk a little about the most common ways cloud services protect your data.

With cloud storage, you dont have to worry about the physical security of your data: even if your laptop or tablet gets stolen, you wont have lost your documents and images. Most cloud storage breaches were actually facilitated by users who gave away their passwords, often as the victims of phishing.

Your introduction to the world of cloud storage is likely to be through the services of Dropbox, Google Drive or OneDrive. These services are backed by big corporations that can offer storage space free of charge.

The slick advertising of these big businesses mean that they manage to grab the attention of many potential cloud storage customers. However, thanks to the security blunders of these major players, specialist providers have found opening in the market. Good examples are Sync.com for storage and Carbonite for backup. Cloudwards.net also has a list ofsecure Dropbox alternatives.

Lets take a look at some of the most common terms youll see when shopping for a cloud storage or backup provider.

HTTPS stands for Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure. HTTP (without the secure) is a standard of messaging that all Web servers use to transfer Web pages to browsers. HTTPS adds a layer of security to these procedures and it is the bedrock of ecommerce.

You will see https:// at the beginning of some addresses in the bar at the top of your browser. That means the Web page that you are looking at was transferred to your computer with the secured version of HTTP. You dont need to worry too much about the security behind HTTPS; its the system that protects your credit card details when you pay for things online.

SSL means Secure Socket Layer and this protocol contains the procedures that put the S in HTTPS. In 2008, after running for a while, SSL was discovered to have some security weaknesses.

The protocol was open to spoofing, which means that hackers were able to forge the security certificates that formed the heart of the SSL verification system. These certificates contain the encryption key that the client is supposed to use in order to secure connections. Soon after, Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol was designed to replace SSL.

Further weaknesses were discovered over the years and they caused the International Engineering Taskforce to deprecate the protocol in 2015, which effectively told everyone not to use SSL for security. Although no one implements SSL any more, the term is still often used: in reality, services that say they use SSL actually use TLS.

Although banks used to rely on HTTPS for security when they provide online banking, most have kicked their privacy features up a notch with two-factor authentication, which you often will see written as 2FA.

As with most logins, you need a username and a password, but 2FA requires some other method of identification on top of that. This should be something that only the user has and it can be a physical possession, or a secret piece of information. Some banks give clients a special card reader which generates a second pass code, while others will send you an access code by SMS.

iCloud uses a keychain device that generates a code. However, that keychain fob quickly disappeared when Apple integrated 2FA code generation into their standard products.

The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology commissioned the creation of the Advanced Encryption Standard, or AES, to create a secure method of encryption that could be used by government agencies.

The encryption process involves transforming blocks of numbers by organizing them into a series of grids and then adjusting each number in the grid by applying a cryptographic key. The specifications for AES allows for different lengths of encryption keys. The shortest key used for encryption is 128 bits long and is often used for encryption on mobile devices. The most common length of key for cloud storage data encryption is 256 bits.

The length of the encryption key is important because the specifications of AES are publicly available. That means that anyone who knows the formula could crack the encryption simply by guessing the key.

You may remember some TV cybercrime thriller where the hackers use a computer program that whizzes through a series of numbers until it hits the right key, flashes, goes beep, and then one of the young hackers says, Were in. Thanks to 256-bit encryption keys, that scene would end up being really long and boring.

There are 1.1 X 1077 possible key combinations. It would take 3.31 X 1056years to guess right. To write that number out in full, you would have 33,100 followed by 53 more zeros. To make decryption even more time consuming, the AES encryption method transforms each grid of numbers 14 times over.

The AES system is so reliable that it has become the touchstone for security all over the Internet. However, thanks to the revelations of Edward Snowden and other leaks regarding the NSA tampering with encryption systems, some worry that even AES may not be completely secure.

If you just keep pictures of yourself on the beach in Cancun on your cloud account, then you should be more worried about TMZ getting them especially if you are Jennifer Lawrence. For most people AES provides ample security.

Those who worry about an encryption system that was created for the U.S. government should look out for cloud storage systems that use the Blowfish security standard. This is older that AES and it had never been cracked until 2016 when the Sweet32 birthday attack was created. Even now, Blowfish is still thought to provide strong enough security for files smaller than 4GB.

The encryption system specification was published in 1993. As with AES, the definition allows for a range of key lengths, which each developer can choose from. The key specs range from 32 bits to 448 bits in length. As with AES, the longer the key, the stronger the security, so check out this stat when selecting a cloud storage provider, like CrashPlan, that uses Blowfish.

Stephen Haunts

Both AES and Blowfish are symmetrical key systems. That means that the cipher used to encrypt the data is also needed to decrypt it. You may already have thought of a flaw with these methods when used for communicating data. How do both sides in a connection get the same key? If one sends the common key to the other, then that message cannot be encrypted because until it has the key, the corresponding computer would not be able to decrypt it.

The answer to this problem lies with asymmetric key systems, such as RSA. These encryption methods are also known as public key. The key that decrypts the protected message is not the same as the one that encrypts it.

It does not matter if a hacker gets hold of the encrypting key because all she will be able to do with it is encrypt messages that only the holder of the corresponding private key could ever decrypt. You cannot derive the private decryption key from the public encryption key.

RSA is named after its creators Rivest, Shamir and Adelman. Most Internet encryption systems use a public key system to distribute the encryption ciphers needed for symmetric key systems, such as AES and Blowfish. RSA is the most frequently used private key system used for key exchange and it is used for key distribution in TLS methods, including HTTPS.

RSA has a 1,024-bit key, which is four times longer than the most commonly used AES key length of 256 bits and eight times longer than the minimum-length AES key of 128 bits.

Internet-based encryption systems rely on client software that communicates with the server. The server is the remote computer that holds the files the cloud storage facility. The client is at the other end of the connection. In the case of your access to cloud storage, the client is your computer.

When you sign up for a service such as Dropbox, the first thing that will happen is that the website will download an installer file for you to run. This installs the client software. Some Internet security systems will include the key for communication with the server in this download.

A potential problem with keys that are reused is that once someone learns that key, they can decrypt all the communications that your computer has with the server and get access to your private files. Perfect Forward Secrecy(PFS)is a methodology by which a new encryption key is used for each session.

If anyone out there has a system to snoop on your connection and capture the encryption key, they would be wasting their efforts because the next time you connect they would have to start their tasks all over again to get the new key.

Perfect Forward Secrecy adds an extra layer of protection to your privacy because it limits the amount of disclosure that any single security breach can deliver.

The specialist storage providers now operate zero-knowledge encryption. You may search the Web and discover information on the Zero Knowledge Protocol. That is something else: zero knowledge encryption simply means that all of the encryption of your files takes place on your computer before they are uploaded to the cloud.

The client software uses a separate process to scramble the files using a key that is resident on your computer. Files are then transferred using a standard method, such as TLS.

The employees of a zero-knowledge providercan never get to the raw files, only the encrypted version. As they also could not get access to the key, you are better off with zero-knowledge encryption than with ciphers that are applied during the transfer or when the files reach the server.

Zero-knowledge encryption is still not good enough for some. The security-conscious argue that the encryption software and keys all originate from the cloud storage provider, so there is still one central location that is vulnerable to attack.

If anyone wanted to get into all the files on a server that operates a zero-knowledge system, they would just need to hijack the key distribution stage.

If the software on your computer uses an encryption key that the hacker knows, then it really doesnt matter where the encryption takes place, he can still get access to all the files on that cloud storage server.

If you install encryption software from another company on your computer, you increase your privacy. You can encrypt all of your files manually and then let the cloud storage client software re-encrypt and transfer the data. That way, if some miscreant has got into the cloud storage servers encryption system, all she can do is decrypt a file to reveal another layer of encryption beneath.

Cracking a security system like that would entail breaking into every encryption software company in the world and manipulating their key distribution procedures. No one has the resources to achieve such a feat.

The degree of privacy that you need for your files greatly depends on the type of information you are storing. There is a wide range of cloud storage options out there and they vary from consumer-friendly free services, such as Dropbox, through to business systems that even the NSA could not crack.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest on new releases and more.

Combining services can give you stronger security. Encrypting your files with completely separate software before you move them anywhere can give you the strongest possible levels of security.

Now you understand the terminology and issues behind security measures, you are better equipped to find the best cloud serviceto fit your needs. What security measures do you take? Let us know in the comments below, thank you for reading.

The rest is here:
Cloud Security: 8 Things You Need to Know When Choosing a ... - Cloudwards