Category Archives: Encryption
Diavol ransomware linked to Trickbot botnet – IT PRO
Security researchers have made a connection between a new strain of ransomware and the cyber criminal gangbehind the Trickbot botnet.
Fortinet discovered the ransomware after it was blocked by the companys FortiEDR product on a customers system. Two files were isolated that were not found on VirusTotal:locker.exeandlocker64.dll. the two bits of malware were deployed a day apart.
While locker64.dll appeared to be a Conti (v3) ransomware, locker.exe was entirely different. The second ransomware was dubbed Diavol by researchers.
Researchers said that as part of a rather unique encryption procedure, Diavol operates using user-mode Asynchronous Procedure Calls (APCs) without a symmetric encryption algorithm.
Usually, ransomware authors aim to complete the encryption operation in the shortest amount of time. Asymmetric encryption algorithms are not the obvious choice as they are significantly slower than symmetric algorithms, said researchers.
The researchers said that asDiavol was deployed in conjunction with the Conti ransomware in this attack, albeit on different machines,they tried to see if there was any correlation between them. They found that command-line parameters used by Diavol are nearly identical to those of Conti and used for the same functionality: log file, encrypt local drives or network shares, and scan specific hosts for network shares.
In addition, Diavol and Conti both operate similarly with asynchronous I/O operations when queuing the file paths for encryption, said researchers.
The researchers said there might also be a link between Diavol and Egregor ransomware. Some lines in the ransom note are identical, they said. Although this is not reliable as it could simply be a red herring that Diavols authors planted.
Some have reported a link between Wizard Spider, the threat actor behind Conti, and Twisted Spider, the threat actor behind Egregor. Allegedly, these gangs cooperate on various operations. They are also both notoriously known for double ransoming their victims (data theft and encryption), researchers added.
Researchers said the source of the intrusion is unknown. The parameters used by the attackers, along with the errors in the hardcoded configuration, hint to the fact that Diavol is a new tool in the arsenal of its operators which they are not yet fully accustomed to.
As the attack progressed, we found more Conti payloads namedlocker.exein the network, strengthening the possibility the threat actor is indeed Wizard Spider. Despite a few similarities between Diavol, Conti, and other related ransomware, its still unclear, however, whether theres a direct link between them, the researchers added.
Spotlight: The state of the UK & Ireland mid-sized business and IT today 2021
The UK and Irelands mid market firms faced a difficult 2020 but have a strong platform for recovery
The secure cloud configuration imperative
The central role of cloud security posture management
Empowering the dynamic worker
How CIOs and IT teams can support a distributed workforce
A new trust model for the 5G era
Data-in-motion security through a 5G infrastructure
Got data? The biggest-ever portable encrypted SSD just came out – Cult of Mac
The headline should probably read, Got data? And money? Storage device-maker Apricorn released on Thursday what it bills as the largest-ever portable encrypted solid state drive. It holds 20TB of data and costs $12,999.
But dont worry, you can get a much smaller one for as little as $239.
The Apricorn Fortress L3 SSD drives, including the monster 20TB model, feature hardware-based 256-bit AES XTS encryption and come encased in rugged enclosures.
The lineup of seven sizes ranges upward in capacity from 512GB. The companys six HDD versions range from 500GB to 5TB.
The new 20TB drive is meant to ferry large amounts of sensitive data securely. Its designed for businesses, but its OS-agnostic, so itll work for anyone.
Anyone, that is, working on any operating system with vast amounts of information they want to store, protect and potentially move around. Say, a person who creates 3D renderings, soundtracks or other large projects, for example.
The 20TB Aegis Fortress L3s mass storage capabilities enable fast response, restoration and recovery in the event of a disaster, reducing downtime and minimizing financial and reputational damage, said Apricorn Managing Director EMEA Jon Fielding.This is critical for businesses looking to build resilience at a time when ransomwareattacks, in particular, are becoming an almost daily occurrence.
The Fortress L3 SSDs bristle with security features. They include physical tamper protection, a wear-resistant keypad, software-free operation and the real-time 256-bit AES XTS hardware encryption mentioned above.
That much security in a portable drive can mean unremarkable data-transfer speeds. But most users should find it an acceptable trade-off with Apricorns advertised SSD transfer speeds maxing out at 370MB per second.
The drives ship with USB-A and USB-C connector cables.
Price: $239 to $12,999
Buy from: Apricorn
See the original post:
Got data? The biggest-ever portable encrypted SSD just came out - Cult of Mac
Application-Level Encryption Market is expected to expand at a CAGR of 25% from 2020 to 2030 KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper – KSU | The Sentinel…
The global application-level encryption market was valued at US$ 718.5 Mn in 2019 and is expected to expand at a CAGR of 25% from 2020 to 2030, reaching US$ 8 Mn by the end of the forecast period.
Application-level encryption solutions help in improving data accuracy in encrypted digital form, minimizes operational cost, and simplifies different data-related operational processes. Thus, the increasing adoption of encryption software to avoid cyber attacks and internal data breaches has led to a rise in demand for application-level encryption solutions
The Application-Level Encryption Market Report discusses the current state of the industry as well as potential business developments across the globe. The report provides pinpoint analysis for changing competitive dynamics. It offers a forward-looking perspective on different factors driving or limiting market growth. It provides a five-year forecast assessed on the basis of how they Application-Level Encryption Market is predicted to grow. It helps in understanding the key product segments and their future and helps in making informed business decisions by having complete insights of market.Additionally, with the emergence of the pandemic, the effect of Covid-19 is analyzed within the report.
The report provides detailed competitive intelligence to make users aware of all the recent innovations and developments with respect to their competition. The strategy, key patterns, market developments along with micro and macro details of competitive market landscapes are well curated in the report. The report has added the forecasts, investigation, and discussion of significant industry trends, market volume, market share estimates, and profiles of the leading industry players. The precise figures and statistical representation of the Application-Level Encryption market are provided. In addition, the report comprises an investment feasibility analysis explaining the total technical feasibility of this undertaking and the price structure.
Download FREE Sample Copy of Application-Level Encryption Market Report @ https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=1506791
Some well-established players in the Application-Level Encryption market are Baffle, Inc., Blue Star Limited, Chino Srls, Dell, Inc., F5 Networks, Inc., Futurex, IBM Corporation, McAfee LLC, Micro Focus International plc, Microsoft Corporation, nCipher Security, LLC, NetLib, Security, Inc.
The global Application-Level Encryption market report looks at the markets main segments and sub-segments, which are divided into product types, applications, and regions. Aside from the devastating economic effects of the Covid-19 outbreak, the study examines the markets dynamics by examining the main output of each segment as well as the segments possible expansion reach in the coming years. The scope of the markets growth potential, revenue growth, product selection, and pricing factors relevant to the global Application-Level Encryption market in terms of applications are also thoroughly evaluated in the report in order to provide a more holistic image of the market.
Market Segment By Deployment
Market Segment By Enterprise Size
Market Segment By Applications
Market Segment By Region:
Regional analysis is another highly comprehensive part of the research and analysis study of the global Application-Level Encryption market is presented in the report. This section sheds light on the sales growth of different regional and country-level. It provides detailed and accurate country-wise volume analysis and region-wise market size analysis of the global market
The report focuses on the main regions and the main countries including:
Do You Have Any Query? Ask to Our Industry Expert @ https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=1506791
The key questions addressed through this innovative research report:
On the whole, the report proves to be an effective tool that players can use to gain a competitive edge over their competitors and ensure lasting success in the global Application-Level Encryption market. The Report broadcasts comprehensive study of the Application-Level Encryption market to anticipate the imminent expansion of the industry. Examining this Application-Level Encryption report can act as a platform for users who intend to take advantage of each and every opportunity in the industry
The content of the study subjects, includes a total of 14 chapters:
Chapter 1 describes Application-Level Encryption product/service scope, market overview, market opportunities, market driving force, and market risks.
Chapter 2 profiles the top manufacturers of Application-Level Encryption market, with product pricing, sales, revenue and global market share of Application-Level Encryption.
Chapter 3 analyses the Application-Level Encryption competitive situation, sales, revenue. The global Application-Level Encryption market shares of top manufacturers are analyzed emphatically by landscape contrast.
Chapter 4 showcases the Application-Level Encryption breakdown data at the regional level, to discuss the sales, revenue, and growth by regions.
Chapter 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 emphasize the sales data at the country level, with sales, revenue, and market share for key countries in the world.
Chapter 10 and 11 explain the segments by sales under type and application, with market shares and growth rate under each category.
Chapter 12 depicts Application-Level Encryption market forecasts by region, type, and application, with sales and revenue projections, from 2020 to 2030.
Chapter 13 and 14 describe Application-Level Encryption sales channel, distributors, customers, research findings and conclusion, appendix, and other data sources.
Enquire for Discount Or Get Customization of Report @ https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.php?type=D&repid=1506791
About ResearchMoz
ResearchMoz is the one stop online destination to find and buy market research reports & Industry Analysis. We fulfil all your research needs spanning across industry verticals with our huge collection of market research reports. We provide our services to all sizes of organisations and across all industry verticals and markets. Our Research Coordinators have in-depth knowledge of reports as well as publishers and will assist you in making an informed decision by giving you unbiased and deep insights on which reports will satisfy your needs at the best price.
For More Information Kindly Contact:
ResearchMoz
90 State Street,
Albany NY,
United States 12207
Tel: +1-518-621-2074
USA-Canada Toll Free: 866-997-4948
Email: sales@researchmoz.us
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/researchmoz
Browse More Reports on: https://latestmarketstatus.blogspot.com/
Read more from the original source:
Application-Level Encryption Market is expected to expand at a CAGR of 25% from 2020 to 2030 KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper - KSU | The Sentinel...
Encryption Key Management Market to Eyewitness Massive Growth by 2028: Ciphercloud, Gemalto, Google The Manomet Current – The Manomet Current
Latest research study from JCMR with title Global Encryption Key Management Market by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2022-2029. The Research report presents a complete assessment of the market and contains Future trend, Current Growth Factors, attentive opinions, facts, historical data, and statistically supported and industry validated market data.The study is segmented by products type & Applications. The research study provides estimates for andEncryption Key Management MarketForecast till 2029
Get Quick Free Sample Copy of Report @:jcmarketresearch.com/report-details/1330922/sampleKey Companies/players:Ciphercloud, Gemalto, Google, IBM, Thales E-Security, Box
Application:[Application]
Type: [Type]
The research covers the current & Future market size of the Global Encryption Key Management market & its growth rates based on 8 year history data. It also covers various types of segmentation such as by geography[China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Southeast Asia, India & Australia].The market competition is constantly growing higher with the rise in technological innovation and M&A activities in the industry. Moreover, many local and regional vendors are offering specific application products for varied end-users.On the basis of attributes such as company overview, recent developments, strategies adopted by the market leaders to ensure growth, sustainability, financial overview and recent developments.
Get the crucial Report@jcmarketresearch.com/report-details/1330922/enquiry
Stay up-to-date with globalEncryption Key Managementmarket research offered by JCMR. Check how key trends and emerging drivers are shaping this industry growth.global market insights reports covers market characteristics, size and growth, segmentation, regional breakdowns, competitive landscape, shares, trend and strategies for this market. The market characteristics section of the report defines and explain the market. The market size section gives the revenues, covering both the historic growth of the market and forecasting the future.
In the GlobalEncryption Key ManagementIndustry Market Analysis & Forecast 2022-2029, the revenue is valued at USD XX million in 2021 and is expected to reach USD XX million by the end of 2029, growing at a CAGR of XX% between 2022 and 2029. The production is estimated at XX million in 2021 and is forecasted to reach XX million by the end of 2029, growing at a CAGR of XX% between 2021 and 2029.
Get Discount on this Quality Report @jcmarketresearch.com/report-details/1330922/discount
QueriesResolved in this report Global Encryption Key Management Market by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2029
What will the market size in 2029 & what will the growth rate?
What are the key market trends?
What is driving Global Encryption Key Management Market?
What are the challenges to market growth?
Who are the key vendors in Global Encryption Key Management Market space?
What are the key market trends impacting the growth of the Global Encryption Key Management Market?
What are the key outcomes of the five forces analysis of the Global Encryption Key Management Market?
What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the Global Encryption Key Management market? Get in-depth details about factors influencing the market shares of the Americas, APAC, and EMEA?
There are 15 Chapters to display the Global Encryption Key Management market.
Chapter 1, to describe Definition, Specifications and Classification of Encryption Key Management, Applications of [Application], Market Segment by Regions;
Chapter 2, to analyze the Manufacturing Cost Structure, Raw Material and Suppliers, Manufacturing Process, Industry Chain Structure;
Chapter 3, to display the Technical Data and Manufacturing Plants Analysis of , Capacity and Commercial Production Date, Manufacturing Plants Distribution, Export & Import, R&D Status and Technology Source, Raw Materials Sources Analysis;
Chapter 4, to show the Overall Market Analysis, Capacity Analysis (Company Segment), Sales Analysis (Company Segment), Sales Price Analysis (Company Segment);
Chapter 5 and 6, to show the Regional Market Analysis that includes North America, China, Europe, Southeast Asia, Japan & India, Encryption Key Management Market Analysis by [Type];
Chapter 7 and 8, to analyze the Encryption Key Management Market Analysis by [Application] Major Manufacturers Analysis of Encryption Key Management;
Chapter 9, Market Trend Analysis, Regional Market Trend, Market Trend by Product Type [Type], Market Trend by Application [Application];
Chapter 10, Regional Marketing Type Analysis, International Trade Type Analysis, Supply Chain Analysis;
Chapter 11, to analyze the Consumers Analysis of;
Chapter 12, to describe Encryption Key Management Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, methodology and data source;
Chapter 13, 14 and 15, to describe Encryption Key Management sales channel, distributors, traders, dealers, Research Findings and Conclusion, appendix and data source.
Buy this research report @jcmarketresearch.com/checkout/1330922
Reasons for Buying this Report
This report provides pin-point analysis for changing competitive dynamics
It provides a forward looking perspective on different factors driving or restraining market growth
It provides a 8-year forecast assessed on the basis of how the market is predicted to grow
It helps in understanding the key product segments and their future
It provides pin point analysis of changing competition dynamics and keeps you ahead of competitors
It helps in making informed business decisions by having complete insights of market and by making in-depth analysis of market segments
Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia.
Find more research reports onEncryption Key Management Industry.By JC Market Research.
About Author:
JCMR global research and market intelligence consulting organization is uniquely positioned to not only identify growth opportunities but to also empower and inspire you to create visionary growth strategies for futures, enabled by our extraordinary depth and breadth of thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist you for making goals into a reality. Our understanding of the interplay between industry convergence, Mega Trends, technologies and market trends provides our clients with new business models and expansion opportunities. We are focused on identifying the Accurate Forecast in every industry we cover so our clients can reap the benefits of being early market entrants and can accomplish their Goals & Objectives.
Contact Us:https://jcmarketresearch.com/contact-us
JCMARKETRESEARCH
Mark Baxter (Head of Business Development)
Phone:+1 (925) 478-7203
Email:sales@jcmarketresearch.com
Connect with us at LinkedIn
Read more here:
Encryption Key Management Market to Eyewitness Massive Growth by 2028: Ciphercloud, Gemalto, Google The Manomet Current - The Manomet Current
Data storage: the importance of protecting the device and not just the network – IT-Online
With data security such a big talking point of late, many of the discussions around protecting data have focused on securing the network. At a time of increased remote working and reliance on cloud technology, perhaps this is understandable.
By Ruben Dennenwaldt, senior product marketing manager at Western Digital (MEA)
However, a key consideration should also be how best to secure the devices that hold this data.
To ensure data is protected, device systems, hardware, and software applications all have to be analysed thoroughly in order to see where improvements can be made to existing infrastructures. Furthermore, new state-of-the-art security techniques need to feel virtually seamless for end users to help ensure the best results.
Infrastructures for storing data can be improved and, in this article, we will examine four areas where proven security concepts have recently seen significant improvement.
The advantages of hardware encryption
Encryption is important to both the confidentiality of data and the drive where that data resides. Strong hardware-based encryption can help to increase security without impacting speed.
These days people have become accustomed to using their mobile phones for authentication, as many of us now keep our phone with us at all times. We pair our phones with external devices such as headphones, and log in with biometrics such as fingerprint or facial recognition. Using these same sorts of actions seemed like the ideal way to add security features in a way that feels very natural and intuitive.
Hardware-based encryption is different than encryption which takes place within software. In software-based encryption, the host computer has access to the encryption key for the disk, which means that malware on the host can steal that key. With many forms of hardware-based encryption, the key used to encrypt data on the drive stays isolated within the drive itself.
Hardware-based encryption therefore helps provide a secure method of establishing trust while also eliminating a traditional point of friction and weakness within the verification process.
Application security through sandboxing
One of the security measures that must be met by apps listed on official app stores is application sandboxing. Sandboxing supports built-in operating system checks to limit an apps use of system resources to only those features that the app developer intends. This helps prevent inserted malicious or faulty code from being used to access additional system resources.
For instance, a sandboxed application cannot corrupt other applications files, or spoof operating system level security dialogues. By contrast, an app which contains a kernel-level driver has full control over your operating system as well as all applications and files on your computer. Any security bug in this driver might allow malware to take over the entire computer.
Sandboxed applications include an entitlement list that enumerates the set of system resources that the app requires. This list is checked by the operator of the app store to ensure that it matches the features of the application. If the application attempts to access a resource that it does not have permission to use, such as a microphone, then the operating systems sandbox will prevent the application from continuing.
This keeps an app from being used to access resources and data on your device. When it comes to ease of use, the key is applying the best practices of mobile device security to external drives. If the drive is uniquely linked via an app on a users compatible smartphone through an encrypted wireless connection it helps bring enhanced security and a great user experience.
Communications protocols over Bluetooth technology and USB ports
Traditionally, there are two methods to unlock your drive and authorise other users: wirelessly via BluetoothTM technology and using a wired method, such as via a USB port. No matter which method you choose, the same technologies are used to help secure your connection to the device.
The Bluetooth pairing process requires a pairing code to be entered on both devices. Nowadays Bluetooth security can provide a point and pair connection process. This layer makes it easier to pair and also helps improve security by verifying the authenticity of the drive when you connect to it.
Drives can contain a label with a unique key that is used to locate and secure the connection. When connecting via Bluetooth technology, you simply scan the QR code on the label, then your phone finds and connects to the drive using the key embedded in the code. When connecting via a USB port, a separate, shorter code is used, which is printed next to the QR code. This code serves as validation you are connecting to the right drive, and also helps prevent malicious applications from connecting to it.
Data Protection through hardware-backed encryption
These days, hardware-backed encryption is based on a new approach to public-key management, one which allows data to be self-secured by the hardware-based key storage in your smartphone or computer.
Passwords can be a weak link in security, while also interfering with the usability of a device. Simply put, people may choose weak passwords, or they forget them. Once the password of a self-encrypting drive is lost, the data on the drive could be lost as well.
To address these issues, there is a new approach to securing data on a self-encrypting drive. A smartphone or laptop can be used as a key that can unlock your drive. Specifically, this is done through a hardware-backed key storage on your device. This hardware protection enforces the use of a mobile devices passcode or the biometric used to unlock the private key.
Moving forward
There are clear advantages to using hardware for data security over solely relying on secure networks. Hardware products can push the boundaries of state-of-the-art security techniques while maintaining ease-of-use that feels virtually seamless.
These products are designed by choosing existing, proven security concepts, improving them whenever possible, and creating innovative solutions where they are needed. Ultimately, by weaving concepts together, a next-generation architecture is created that helps provide security over many technology layers.
Related
Read the rest here:
Data storage: the importance of protecting the device and not just the network - IT-Online
Global E-mail Encryption Market 2021 Demands To Sustain in Future Industry Size, Growth, Revenue, Global Statistics and Forecast to 2030 The Manomet…
TheE-mail Encryption MarketReport makes available the current and forthcoming technical and financial details of the industry. The report contains an in-depth analysis of market characteristics, size and growth, segmentation, regional and country breakdowns, competitive landscape. This report explores all the key factors affecting the growth of the global market, including demand-supply scenario, pricing structure, profit margins, production, and value chain analysis. TheBig Market Researchstudy involves the extensive usage of both primary and secondary data sources.
The process begins with internal and external sources to obtain qualitative and quantitative information related to the Global E-mail Encryption Market. It also provides an overview and forecast for the Global E-mail Encryption Market based on all the segmentation provided for the global region. The predictions highlighted in the Global E-mail Encryption Market share report have been derived using verified research procedures and assumptions. By doing so, theBig Market Researchreport serves as a repository of analysis and information for every component of the Global E-mail Encryption Market
NOTE:Our report highlights the major issues and hazards that companies might come across due to the unprecedented outbreak of COVID-19.
Ask for a Holistic Sample PDF Copy of Global E-mail Encryption Market with Figures, Graphs and Tocs:https://www.bigmarketresearch.com/request-sample/4305143?utm_source=MNO&utm_medium=MWA
Market players have been discussed and profiles of leading players including Top Key Companies:HPData MotionProofpointEdgeWaveTrend MicroCryptzoneSymantecSophosLuxSciPrivato
Key highlights from Covid-19 impact assessment:
Why to Select This Report:
Talk to our Analyst / Ask for a profitable discount on Global E-mail Encryption Market and Get More Information Related to This Report:https://www.bigmarketresearch.com/request-for-discount/4305143?utm_source=MNO&utm_medium=MWA
The Global E-mail Encryption Market is also characterized by a highly complex value chain involving product manufacturers, material suppliers, technology developers, and manufacturing equipment developers. Partnerships between research organizations and the industry players help in streamlining the path from the lab to commercialization. In order to also leverage the first mover benefit, companies need to collaborate with each other so as to develop products and technologies that are unique, innovative and cost effective.
The report includes the region-wise segmentation North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia), South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia etc.), Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa) of the market. In the regional segmentation, the regions dominating the Global E-mail Encryption market are included along with the regions where the growth of the market is slow.
By the product type, the Global E-mail Encryption Market is primarily split into 2020-2025:On-PremisesCloud
By the end-users/application, the Global E-mail Encryption Market report covers the following segments 2020-2025:BFSIHealthcareGovernmentRetailIT and TelecomEducationManufacturingOthers
Conclusively, this report is a one stop reference point for the industrial stakeholders to get Global E-mail Encryption market forecast of till 2025. This report helps to know the estimated market size, market status, future development, growth opportunity, challenges, and growth drivers of by analyzing the historical overall data of the considered market segments.
You May Also Like Our Other Top Trending Reports:
For More Information Regarding Other Similar Trending Report Click on The Given Link:https://manometcurrent.com/provider-data-management-solution-market-forecast-covering-growth-inclinations-development-strategies-until-2030-kyruus-lexisnexis-apexonhealth/
Contact us:Mr. Abhishek Paliwal5933 NE Win Sivers Drive, #205, Portland,OR 97220 United StatesDirect:+1-971-202-1575Toll Free:+1-800-910-6452E-mail:help@bigmarketresearch.com
Hardware Encryption Market 2021 Industry Analysis by Manufacturers, End-User, Type, Application, Regions and Forecast to 2027 The Manomet Current -…
Hardware Encryption Industry is going to play an increasingly important role in the coming years, Market Predicts High CAGR between 2020 and 2027. Breaking down the global trend Hardware Encryption Market currently leading in Europe, the APAC region, South America, and the MEA region. Hardware Encryption is totally fragmented due to presence of maximum players in most of the regions across the globe. Later, the report also delivers different segments on basis of product category, plentiful applications of the product and key revenue regions which highly contribute to the Market share.
Request a Free Sample to Understand the Scope of the Report: https://www.esticastresearch.com/report/hardware-encryption-market/#request-for-sample
Note: Report Covers the Detailed Pre and Post COVID-19 Impact Analysis on Hardware Encryption Market
Hardware Encryption Market was valued at $52.45 billion in 2016, and is projected to reach $1,085 billion by 2024, having a CAGR of 46.3% during the forecast period of 2017 to 2024. The technology which encrypts the data stored in a hard drive using appropriate and specific mathematical functions is called as hardware encryption. Hardware encryption restricts the unauthorized entities from accessing the important data. The hardware encryption market is majorly driven by reduced cost of encryption and increasing complexity & volume of data breaches.
The research scrutinizes new growth opportunities, carried out with in-depth analysis of the Hardware Encryption Market on the basis of development, and data analysis accounting every aspect of Hardware Encryption Market. Global industry interprets the fundamental aspects of the commanding Market players with their business summary, Hardware Encryption Market sales, press release and evolution taking place in the Market.
COVID-19 IMPACT Analysis on Hardware Encryption Market
Coronavirus has influenced every one of the organizations, little or large, dealing in any sector. The growth curves of Hardware Encryption Market have seen immense fluctuations in the year 2020. The Market scenario and the pace of growth have taken a colossal turn and have prompted numerous adjustments in the cycles, which will have repercussions for a significant stretch. 2021 is probably going to be superior to 2020 for the Hardware Encryption Market players as the greater part of the organizations have continued their activities and the interest is getting reestablished for them.
Some Major 10+ Key players in the Hardware Encryption Market:
Certes Networks Inc.IBM CorporationImation Corp.Kingston Technology Corporation Inc.Maxim Integrated Products Inc.Micron Technology Inc.NetApp Inc.Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.SanDisk CorporationSeagate Technology LLCToshiba Corporation
Click here to get the short-term and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on this Market. Please visit: https://www.esticastresearch.com/report/hardware-encryption-market
Hardware Encryption Market Competitive Analysis:
The report studies the competitive framework and business environment via different analytical frameworks such as
Download the Post-Pandemic Business Planning Structure : https://www.esticastresearch.com/report/hardware-encryption-market/#request-for-sample
Hardware Encryption Market Segmentation:
Report digs deep into critical aspects of key subjects which help Market players to make appropriate changes in their approach. Hardware Encryption Market report provide competitive analysis which helps readers to become aware of unique characteristics of crucial factors impacting the Market competition. Hardware Encryption Market report provides accurate Market data, Market dynamics and key segments. Report will also provide that how will Market situation change in the coming years and the Important changes in Market dynamics, it also provides former, on-going, and projected Market analysis in terms of volume and value with Emerging segments and regional Markets.
By Segments
By UsageStorage DeviceNetwork
By Application,
Healthcare SectorMilitary & AerospaceAutomotive & TransportationBFSIIT & TelecomOthers (Retail, Education, Individual User)
Regional analysis:
Geographical Markets are covered separately within the report that includes a competitive analysis on their Market performance in the base year as well as predictions for the forecast year. Extensive primary research is conducted to carry out leading information in order to understand the Market condition and competition within a specified geography. Comparison between two or multiple geographical Markets is carried out effectively to know where to invest in.
By Regions:
Click here for Detailed Analysis Report : https://www.esticastresearch.com/report/hardware-encryption-market
Customization of the Report: This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team (ash@esticastresearch.com), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-213-262-0704 to share your research requirements. Note: If you have any special requirement, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.
Click Here for FREE Consultation Call with Our Analysts/Industry Experts to Find Solution for Your Business : https://www.esticastresearch.com/report/hardware-encryption-market/#inquiry-before-buying
Contact Us:
Esticast ResearchEmail: ash@esticastresearch.comPhone: +1-213-262-0704Web: http://www.esticastresearch.com
See the rest here:
Hardware Encryption Market 2021 Industry Analysis by Manufacturers, End-User, Type, Application, Regions and Forecast to 2027 The Manomet Current -...
Former Anonymous and Lulzsec hacker discusses his criminal past and gives his top tips for avoiding ransomware – Texasnewstoday.com
Jake Davis, known as Topiary, breaks down the Travelex hack amongst others, and explains why the governments repeated attempts to outlaw end-to-end encryption will never work
Jake Davis, the former hacker known as Topiary and senior member of hacktivist groups Anonymous and Lulzsec has spoken about the scale of the ransomware challenge facing organisations today, and given his tips for staying secure.
Speaking at Computings recent Cyber Security Festival, Davis began by outlining his history as a hacktivist before his capture and arrest in 2011.
Im a former hacktivist, I was involved in Anonymous and Lulzsec. I was involved in hacking the Westboro Baptist Church, which is a homophobic and racist group. W e would target groups like this and take them down. That also shows the silly mistakes I made when I was a hacker.
Obviously Im not one now because Im showing my face I got caught! I used my real voice like an idiot during the live broadcast of the hack on YouTube in 2010.
He also discussed his history with Lulzsec.
I was also involved in Lulzsec we were a meta hacking group that tried to make fun of hacking groups who took themselves seriously. Our naive teenage goal was to expose the lack of global security posture by hacking everything in existence. With immediate hindsight that was very reckless. Someone dared us on Twitter to take down the CIA website, so we took it down for the afternoon.
His groups were also involved in several attacks on well-known newspapers.
We pioneered this real fake news strategy where wed highlight security flaws in major newspaper websites by hacking into them and posting stories as if they were from their own editorial team like Tupac and Biggy are alive in New Zealand.
We also went after News International in 2011 in the midst of the phone hacking scandal, where journalists from the Sun and News of the World and others were getting away with hacking the voicemails of celebrities, whilst hacktivists were prosecuted. They had very good lawyers so they were getting away with it, so we hacked them in response.
But events soon spiralled out of control.
Things got a little out of hand. We were 17 and 18 at the time. We didnt realise the scope of how the real world would respond, until we saw our ridiculous imagery of a man in a top hat sipping wine with a cat flying through space, on the front page of the Wall Street Journal. The headline was Hackers broaden their attacks.
People started to dress like us, and we were trending on Twitter with boy band One Direction at number two. We realised things have gone too far and we were doomed. And indeed we were.
Davis outlined the details of his arrest and prosecution.
I was arrested in a joint Met Police operation with the FBI. I was sentenced to two years in a young offenders institute. Luckily I didnt need to spend anything like two years though because for the previous two years Id been in home detention with an electronic tag, because it took so long to go to trial. In 2011 prosecuting this type of attack was so novel, the legal teams and judges didnt know how to get to grips with it.
I spent five years until 2018 banned from encryption. Which makes no sense, the law made no sense. I spoke to someone from the serious crime prevention squad to explain I needed to draw some money from the bank. Technically Im using encryption when I put the card in, because you enter your PIN, that goes to the bank and its encrypted. If I turn on my computer, thats encryption.
Today Davis works in the cyber security industry.
I do some traditional cyber work, some bug bounty hunting, creative consultancy for TV, movies and theatre. I talk to universities and schools and encouraging the next generation of hackers not to be like Lulzsec, but to think critically and to use their skills to make the world a more secure place.
If I had to compare 2021 to 2011 theres a lot of negativity around hacker groups now because theyve moved more towards financial gain, especially with ransomware. Thats what I hear about the most.
Bug Bounties
He explained that he is a big fan of bug bounties, with some companies encourage ethical hacking where hackers privately expose the vulnerabilities they have discovered in corporate sites in exchange for money, so that the organisation can fix the problem before a more malicious actor has the chance to exploit it.
Bug bounties are very useful, and they did not exist in any formal way when I was hacking ten years ago. There were some companies ten years ago we hacked who we decided to inform quietly rather than make public. The NHS for example. In 2011 we found flaws in NHS websites in England so we told them about it privately. The Crown Prosecution Service decided to prosecute us for this anyway which nowadays would be completely insane.
If youre a big company and you put out a notice saying you can hack us within this scope, theres no way youre going to start prosecuting hackers, youd get laughed out of the room. We often in the UK overlook things like in Argentina if youre a bug bounty hacker you earn 40 times more than the median salary.
This is improving year on year in places like Argentina, where bug bounty hackers can provide for their entire families, and their skills are through the roof. If youre Facebook and you have a $500 minimum which you pay hackers, and you pay it directly into their Paypal account thats amazing for them.
When ethical hackers were surveyed and asked why they hack, the number one reason was To make money. This is what motivates even the most moral and ethical hackers. Thats the same motivation for not very ethical hackers and thats a big problem because the ability to make money through cybercrime has always existed, but its become very easy now.
We like to think were in a world where 11 billion records have been leaked but only very high level hackers can go after those records, but the truth is that the skill floor is so ridiculously low.
The site HaveIBeenPwned.com lists 11.4 billion breached accounts in existence, a number which is growing by around a billion a year.
This is a very ethical website, you put in your email address and it says you are in this many data breaches, but there are unethical versions of this site where people put in your email or phone number and they get all of your information and takes no skill to do. We dont really know how many of these sites have been hacked.
Travelex
Davis went on to explain that around $350 million was paid out in ransoms in 2020, then gave a case study around the Travelex hack in 2020.
Theres a very specific type of software they were using which was eight months out of date. They were advised to patch this five months before by the UK government, and five months before that UK security advisors came out with a fix for this bug. So essentially they were eight months out of date on a piece of software and were hit with a ransomware attack, and ended up paying out 2.3 million.
This is an interesting example of ransomware groups who dont target companies but software vulnerabilities. So if there are 10,000 companies using a piece of software and the hackers know of a vulnerability in that software they go for all 10,000, and they check the net and go Oh look weve got Travelex, lets extort them, and they end up paying.
A Dutch supermarket ran out of cheese once because of ransomware. A logistics supplier got hacked. No one was specifically targeting a Dutch logistics company they just happened to be using a piece of software.
It was the same with Wannacry. They werent targeting the NHS, they were targeting banks elsewhere in the world and it just so happened to hit the UK.
Darkside
He also described more advanced hacking groups like Darkside, which he said included hackers with a far higher level of skill.
Theyre very media savvy and they use double extortion. They also know whats in the files theyve hacked. So they can extort you for money for releasing the files, but then they go We know the damage it would cause to you to release this information, and that results in a lot of companies paying up. I saw recently a chatlog because they have their own customer support, which is really victim negotiation chat, where a victim was saying Ill pay 7 million, and Darkside said: Youre not a bunch of children we know you have the money, give us 12 million. And they ended up getting it.
These groups can also outsource to other hackers, because they have a lot of money, and a lot of cryptocurrency. So they say to another hacker Well pay you $500,000 for a zero-day vulnerability. That will net them more ransomware revenue. And theyll also offer ransomware as a service and take an affiliate percentage of it.
A lot of them wont be able to get that money out because its very traceable, but they still have millions of dollars at their disposal, but often not much skill. And thats a scary thought when there are websites where you can buy the latest iPhone hack for a million dollars they have that, its not much money to them.
Security Tips
All of which is very alarming for organisations of all shapes and sizes. So what does Davis recommend that we do about it?
You can search peoples usernames or passwords to retrieve information about an entire company. So credential management is extremely important along with enforcing unique credentials.
Two-factor authentication is also essential. And please dont use SMS for two-factor authentication, because basically the entire telecoms network should be destroyed and rebuilt!
The most important thing I can leave you with on ransomware is dont just worry about stopping ransomware hitting you, but run simulations on what would happen if ransomware did hit you. The raging debate at the moment is should you pay the ransom?
My view is you should never pay unless you have to, so you should strive to not have to. So run these simulations so you can say if we are hit, can we position ourselves do we dont need to pay? So you have the backups, they work and the damage can be mitigated so you can still function as a business.
My number one piece of advice: just listen to more talks for security events.
Davis then discussed cyber insurance, explaining that hackers today target cyber insurance companies specifically so they can get lists of clients, so they know who to hack. They then get a higher likelihood of receiving a payout.
Cyber insurance companies now often refuse to payout ransom demands. There are 40 or so companies about the $500 million premium threshold and if only a few of those are hit and get a maximum payout then youre looking at over half a century of premiums. At the moment its risky for companies getting cyber insurance but its also risky for the cyber insurance companies themselves.
He sees wasted effort in cyber security, and also dislikes the extravagant claims made by some products.
Im very sceptical of expensive products which claim to stop 100 per cent of all hacks. You cannot say youre 100 per cent unhackable. Companies who claim to make you invincible should be avoided. What I see a lack of is hiring good people and sticking to basic principles.
For instance the Travelex hack could have been avoided by patching software. I wish I didnt have to say this, if you have these core principles in place you destroy the low hanging fruit for low level hackers. Whats happened in the last decade is the low level hackers have scaled up and now youve got people that ten years ago couldnt fund themselves now have access to millions of dollars in cryptocurrency and can buy the worlds greatest exploits and espionage technology and run havoc with it.
Companies are focused on defending against the big nation-state zero-day exploiting threats, but getting knocked out by these cheeky attacks by kids. And they dont admit it, because it would look bad to say we forgot to lock this door, but this is what most hacks are, and it will continue that way until we correct this basic posture.
End-to-end Encryption
Finally Davis talked about the UK governments repeated attempts to outlaw end-to-end encryption.
It wont work. Banning end to end encryption is like banning maths, it wont work. You cant put a backdoor into end-to-end encryption for the government because as Ed Snowden says a backdoor for one is a backdoor for all.
Theres also nothing wrong with encrypting your data. Lots of threat actors will say youre hiding something. The classic line is you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide, which I dont agree with at all. Its not about hiding something its about your basic fundamental human right to privacy.
I travel around with a lot of sensitive work-related information on my laptop, and I take pride in full-disc encrypting it. This is something we can all do.
Governments find most success in taking over entire infrastructure. If you look at end-to-end encrypted messenger apps which are designed specifically for crime like EncroChat, they just get completely taken over by governments.
I agree with targeted surveillance, going after specific people, but mass surveillance and going after end-to-end encryption is a very slippery slope, so my advice is to encrypt everything.
Former Anonymous and Lulzsec hacker discusses his criminal past and gives his top tips for avoiding ransomware Source link Former Anonymous and Lulzsec hacker discusses his criminal past and gives his top tips for avoiding ransomware
Follow this link:
Former Anonymous and Lulzsec hacker discusses his criminal past and gives his top tips for avoiding ransomware - Texasnewstoday.com
Researchers: 2G Connection Encryption Deliberately Weakened To Comply With Cryptowar Export Restrictions – Techdirt
from the endangering-phone-users-in-the-name-of-public-safety dept
Researchers have discovered a backdoor in 2G encryption, one that was deliberately created. As this report by Lorenzo Franchesi-Bicchierai for Motherboard points out, the researchers didn't necessarily know it was deliberate when they discovered it.
Researchers from several universities in Europe found that the encryption algorithm GEA-1, which was used in cellphones when the industry adopted GPRS standards in 2G networks, was intentionally designed to include a weakness that at least one cryptography expert sees as a backdoor. The researchers said they obtained two encryption algorithms, GEA-1 and GEA-2, which are proprietary and thus not public, "from a source." They then analyzed them and realized they were vulnerable to attacks that allowed for decryption of all traffic.
The researchers said in their research paper the backdoor appeared to be deliberate. They reverse-engineered the algorithm, trying to randomly replicate the weakness in the random number generator they'd discovered. They were unable to do so. After observing this, they came to a pretty dead-on conclusion:
This implies that the weakness in GEA-1 is unlikely to occur by chance, indicating that the security level of 40 bits is due to export regulations.
This was confirmed shortly after the paper [PDF] was published.
A spokesperson for the organization that designed the GEA-1 algorithm, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), admitted that the algorithm contained a weakness, but said it was introduced because the export regulations at the time did not allow for stronger encryption.
This algorithm hasn't been in common use for years. The 2G standard has been abandoned in favor of 3G and 4G, eliminating this deliberately induced weakness. Export regulations no longer require deliberate weakening of encryption, so current standards are far more secure.
But even though 2G networks haven't been in common use since the early 2000's, this weakness (which still exists) still has relevance. One of the features of Stingray devices and other cell site simulators is the ability to force all connecting phones to utilize a 2G connection.
Handsets operating on 2G will readily accept communication from another device purporting to be a valid cell tower, like a stingray. So the stingray takes advantage of this feature by jamming the 3G and 4G signals, forcing the phone to use a 2G signal.
This means anyone using a cell site simulator can break the weakened encryption and intercept communications or force connecting devices to cough up precise location data. While law enforcement agencies (including the FBI) claim not to use any features that allow interception, the US is not the only customer for these devices. And there's been no confirmation that any US agency isn't using these to intercept communications they feel aren't protected by the Fourth Amendment, like conversations occurring in other countries (remember: the military had Stingrays first) or close to our nation's borders.
This revelation adds more info to the body of work dealing with the first cryptowar that began all the way back in the 1990s. Back then, the US government considered the export of strong encryption to be a criminal act. The NSA was one of the beneficiaries of this determination. This determination -- and the NSA's input -- resulted in the standardization of weakened encryption by the RSA. Even after the US government abandoned its criminalization of strong encryption, state-sponsored hackers (including our own NSA) were often able to force to force sites and content delivery services to utilize "export grade" encryption rather than stronger options in order to intercept communications and content.
Fortunately, most of that is behind us now. Our communications are now protected by encryption that hasn't been deliberately weakened. But it's still out there. And it can still be exploited by attackers with the right tools.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyones attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise and every little bit helps. Thank you.
The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 2g, backdoor, encryption, gea-1, weakened
See the original post here:
Researchers: 2G Connection Encryption Deliberately Weakened To Comply With Cryptowar Export Restrictions - Techdirt
Why Inspecting Encrypted Traffic Is A Must – Security Boulevard
What You Dont See Can Harm You
As we emerge from the COVID-19 lockdown, we see a rash of malicious ransomware attacks trying to shut down many sectors of the economy Colonial Pipeline, J.B.S, C.N.A Financial for profit. Why? Because crime pays. Even more threatening are the ones we dont hear about those from the users inside of the organization.
The same encryption mechanism using a public key to secure our communication transport level security (TLS) a.k.a Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) can be used by malicious users or programs to access sensitive information.
Initially, botnets were used for DDoS attacks. Now, some of these command-and-control malware use the resources of infected machines for ransom and profit (ransomware and crypto-mining), significantly affecting an enterprises performance and increasing operating costs as well as wear on the commandeered machines. These attacks can also be a conduit for additional future malware delivery.
Most malware threatens the availability, integrity, and security of a network.
As we have seen recently, ransomware attacks can often result in information theft and hijacking in addition to disrupting an organizations mission-critical operations.
When the malware activates, it may open an encrypted session to an external server. The only information the malware requires to secure the communication with the external server is the external servers public key. Since the sending organization (of the user or malware program) does not have the private key to this encrypted communication, it cannot decipher this session and thus is blind to any information that is being sent outside.
As the usage of encrypted traffic increases, this challenge will become even more pervasive. We are already beginning to see such cyber-attacks on many organizations for financial gain and access to valuable confidential data.
Many traffic inspection solutions such as data leakage prevention (DLP), intrusion prevention systems (IPS), and firewalls may not have the ability to decrypt outbound encrypted traffic, and therefore are blind to cyber threats initiated from within the organization to external servers. Furthermore, even when they can decrypt, the ability comes with a steep cost-performance impact and expense, making these systems less scalable and thus uneconomical.
Inspection and Visibility The Necessary Disinfectant
The key to protecting against such attacks is to inspect SSL traffic. So, how does the SSL traffic inspection work?
The SSL inspection systems take advantage of the fact that the security is between two endpoints and not end-to-end. Sometimes referred to as legitimate man-in-the-middle (MiTM), the SSL inspection solution intercepts and decrypts SSL sessions destined to and from the enterprise. These SSL inspection solutions appear as the intended external server for internal users or programs initiating secure communication to external servers. For the recipient servers, the SSL inspection system appears as the initiating user or malware program.
For ease of deployment, SSL inspection solutions may provide both transparent inspection without requiring the need to re-engineer the network or as explicit proxy that require all users to pass through a predefined SSL proxy configured via a users browser.
Then, the decrypted traffic is steered to any content inspection solution such as firewalls, anti-malware, or data leakage protection systems already deployed in the enterprise to check against an organizations security policies. Sessions that pass the security inspection are then re-encrypted by the SSL inspection solution and forwarded to their destination server.
[Like this post? Subscribe now to get the latest Radware content in your inbox weekly plus exclusive access to Radwares Premium Content. ]
For efficiency, some traffic may be untouched if a particular site is trusted by the enterprise or is related to employee privacy (online banking, healthcare). For productivity reasons, other traffic may be blocked, typically online gaming or known malware servers.
Since SSL decryption and re-encryption are computationally intensive operations and may impact latency, use best practices such as hardware acceleration if you have many users and encrypted traffic. Be selective with decryption by using filtering and whitelists to bypass decryption for sites that you trust, and choose solutions that reduce the number of devices you require to scale and are cost-effective.
Decrypting, inspecting, and gaining visibility to network traffic using SSL inspection solution helps identify red flags that may indicate malware. Furthermore, adopting the best practices: least privilege access, multi-factor authentication while stopping web malware injections using web application firewalls, and protecting network perimeter against denial of service while educating the workforce on cybersecurity practices help reduce an enterprises exposure to these malware threats.
[You may also like: How to Respond to a DDoS Ransom Note]
More:
Why Inspecting Encrypted Traffic Is A Must - Security Boulevard