Where the Acting FBI Director Stands on Encryption – InsideSources

Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe sits with a folder marked "Secret" in front of him while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 11, 2017, before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on major threats facing the U.S. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

The new acting director of the FBI Andrew McCabe will inherit more from predecessor James Comey than an investigation into Russian ties to the campaign of President Donald Trump, who fired Comey Tuesday. Depending on how long he runs the agency before a Trump successor is approved something Senate Democrats upset over Comeys firing will likely draw out McCabe may have to take up Comeys other political battles, including encryption.

Almost since the beginning of his tenure as head of the FBI in 2013, Comey engaged in a crusade against criminals and terrorists evading law enforcement and intelligence surveillance online, or going dark, via default encryption platforms like Apples iPhone and Android OS.

Comey has spent the last several years repeatedly testifying before Congress that letting companies like Apple refuse law enforcement requests for user data puts lives at risk and grants bad actors more leverage when communicating online.

We all care about safety and security on the Internet and Im a big fan of strong encryption we all care about public safety, and the problem we have here is those are in tension in a whole lot of our work, the former FBI director told Congress in 2015.We work for the American people. We work with the tools that they give us through Congress. And so our job is to say, Hey look, our tools are being eroded, and were not making it up.'

Comey at first sought legislation from Congress mandating companies like Apple build back doors into their products through which law enforcement and intelligence agencies could access and decrypt communications. Comey later backed down in favor of a more nuanced and less specific approach, calling on lawmakers, agencies, and companies to sit down and work out a solution.

The debate came to a head last year when the FBI sued Apple to unlock the iPhone of one of the attackers in the December 2015 shooting in San Bernardino, California that left 14 dead. The agency eventually abandoned the case in favor of letting an outside firm crack the phones encryption. Congress convened a working group to examine the issue that largely fell between the cracks during the 2016 election season.

Now a rising number of ISIS-inspired terrorist attacks in Europe and growing concerns of cybersecurity and election hacking in the U.S. and abroad are churning up the issue again, with Trump himself taking a stand against Apple during the campaign.

Even if McCabe is replaced, hes likely to have an influence on the agencys encryption stance going forward as the deputy under Comey. During an interview with McCabe in October, the then-deputy director appeared to defer more to the American public than his boss at the time when deciding how to strike the right balance between privacy and national security.

Its a great question and its one you probably dont want me to answer, or [National Security Agency Director] Mike Rogers to answer or the private sector to answer, McCabe told CNBC. How do we have a conversation in this country about how do we feel about the cost of privacy versus national security?

McCabe said theres no world of absolute privacy or security, and that neither side has made progress by throwing absolute positions at each other.

During a panel discussion on cybersecurity at the Cambridge Cyber Summit, co-sponsored by CNBC, MIT, and the Aspen Institute, McCabe said of the Apple case it should be an issue Congress decides, not law enforcement.

The then-deputy director echoed one of Comeys arguments against tech community claims that to create access to any encrypted platforms means compromising the whole system.

We were innovative enough, we were smart enough to create the very technology thats given us these opportunities, McCabe said. I believe that we are also smart enough and innovative enough to come up with a solution that meets a reasonable privacy concern but also meets a reasonable national security concern.

Follow Giuseppe on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning

Visit link:
Where the Acting FBI Director Stands on Encryption - InsideSources

Related Posts

Comments are closed.