Like racecars on a track, thousands of particles called muons zip around an experiments giant 50-foot circular magnet at 99.9% of the speed of light. After making a few hundred laps in less than a millisecond, the muons decay and are soon replaced by another bunch.

The goal of the experiment, Fermilab Muon g-2, is to better understand the properties of muons, which are essentially heavier versions of electrons, and use them to probe the limitations of the Standard Model of particle physics. Specifically, physicists want to know about the muons magnetic momentthat is, how much do they rotate on their axes in a powerful magnetic field as they race around the magnet?

In 2001, an experiment at the US Department of Energys Brookhaven National Lab found that the muons turned more than theory predicted. The result surprised the physics community: If there really were a discrepancy, it could be a hint of new physics, like some as-yet-unknown particle influencing the muon. Two decades later, physicists hope to resolve the matter. Fermilab Muon g-2 aims to quadruple the precision of the 2001 finding and determine whether experiment really disagrees with theory.

Theres another side to the search thoughone thats carried out not with particle accelerators and giant magnets, but with equations on blackboards and computer simulations. Since 2016, another group of physicists has been trying to update the theoretical prediction of the muons magnetic moment by combining the efforts of several groups.

In June, the Muon g-2 Theory Initiative, which comprises 132 physicists across 82 institutions, published its first prediction: They calculated the muons anomalous magnetic moment, or ,to be 116,591,810x10-11. The value differs subtly, but significantly from the 2001 experiment, which found to be 116,592,089x10-11. (Thats a difference of less than 3parts permillion, for those keeping score at home.)

This is the first time that the entire community has come together and reached a consensus on the Standard Model prediction of this quantity, says Aida X. El-Khadra, a physicist at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and cofounder of the Theory Initiative. Previously, individual groups produced their own predictions of , which differed slightly from one another.

By combining their efforts, physicists in the Theory Initiative hope that theyll be able to come up with an ultra-precise prediction to complement the forthcoming result from the Fermilab Muon g-2 experiment. Both the experiment and the theory initiative receive support from DOEs Office of Science.

But just how do physicists predict something like the muons magnetic moment, and why does it take 132 of them?

Illustration by Sandbox Studio, Chicago with Ariel Davis

The first calculations of particle magnetic moments came in the 1920s, when physicists were just beginning to develop relativistic quantum mechanics. British theoretical physicist Paul Dirac, building on the work of Llewellyn Thomas and others, found the ultimate equation describing the electron and its spinthen conceived of as the electrons internal rotationand its magnetic moment. Dirac predicted this number, called g, to be exactly 2.

But atomic spectroscopy experiments soon found that g differedfrom that prediction by about 0.1%a so-called anomalous magnetic moment, e. In 1947, Julian Schwinger developed a theoretical explanation: The electron could emit and then reabsorb a virtual photon, which slightly changed its interaction with a magnetic field.

Every way that something can happen in nature will happen, says Tom Blum, a theoretical physicist at the University of Connecticut. If a particle starts from here and gets to there, it can take all possible paths to get from there to there. And what quantum field theory tells us is how to weight those paths.

The emission and absorption of a single virtual photon is just the most straightforward of these possible particle paths. Since Schwinger, physicists have been working to calculate increasingly unlikely possible paths that a particle can take. Ironically, the way they think about these paths is with a tool of Schwingers rival, Richard Feynman. To illustrate the paths and calculate their probabilities, Feynman developed his eponymously named diagrams.

Here, the Feynman diagram represents a muon (the Greek letter mu) moving left to right in a magnetic field (the squiggly line, which also denotes a photon).

The Feynman diagram for Schwingers path is slightly more complicatedthis time theres a squiggly blue line, the virtual photon being emitted and absorbed by the muon. This contributes approximately 0.00116 to . This is the vast majority of muons anomalous magnetic moment.

To make the task manageable, the Theory Initiative segmented the task of calculating the muons magnetic moment into each component. To get down to a precision of about 100 parts in a billion, physicists have had to calculate a lot more than just a single virtual photon.

Contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment come from the three different interactions the strong interaction, the weak interaction and quantum electrodynamics all contribute, Blum says.

There was at one point some thought that gravity would have an impact, but further investigation proved its role was too small.

Quantum electrodynamics, or QED, covers all the possible ways a photon can interact with a muon. To get better precision, physicists can account for more virtual photons. Each additional virtual photon has about 1/137th the chance of being produced and reabsorbed, so a Feynman diagram with two virtual photons contributes about 1 / 137 * 137to , three virtual photons contribute 1 / 137 * 137* 137, and so on. Physicists have even gone all the way to five virtual photons.

With five virtual photons, there are more than 10,000 possible paths, so there are a corresponding number of Feynman diagrams to calculate. Possibilities abound because virtual photons can split into a virtual electron and a virtual positron (the antimatter counterpart to an electron). This virtual pair can then annihilate back into a virtual photon. Describing these complex paths requires loops and squiggles that arc over each other. Five-photon Feynman diagrams look less like a traditional particle physics schematic and more like abstract art.

The weak force, which governs the radioactive decay of nuclei, also plays a role in influencing the muons magnetic moment. Unlike QED, which is mediated by the massless photon, the weak force is mediated by the massive W and Z bosons, which each weigh about 90 times the mass of a proton. The fact that the bosons are heavy makes it extremely unlikely that the muon would emit and absorb a virtual W or Z boson. But occasionally, it does happen.

Both QED and the contribution from the weak force can be calculated to extremely high precision. The process is arduous, but physicists can calculate a good deal of the interactions simply by hand. Thats not the case with contributions from particles bound together by the strong force called hadrons, which represent the majority of uncertainty in the calculation of the muons anomalous magnetic moment.

Gluons, the particles that mediate the strong force, are described by the rules of quantum chromodynamics, or QCD. Unlike photons in QED, gluons can interact with one another. Trying to calculate QCD processes by hand is effectively impossible, because the self-interacting gluons throw everything out of whack.

The reason why we need a collaborative effort is because the hadronic corrections cannot be calculated from first principle QCD on a blackboard, says El-Khadra.

There are two main types of hadronic corrections: vacuum polarization corrections and light by light corrections. In vacuum polarization, the muon emits a virtual photon, which decays into a quark and antiquark. These quarks and antiquarks exchange gluons, turning into a frothing blob of hadronic matter such as pions and kaons. Finally, the virtual blob of hadronic matter ends when a quark and antiquark annihilate back into a virtual photon, which is finally absorbed by the muon.

Light by light contributions are perhaps some of the strangest. From the outside, it looks as if two virtual photons are emitted by a muon, interact, and are then absorbed. Whats going on here?

When we look around us the reason why we can see very well is because photonsto a large degreedon't interact with each other, says Christoph Lehner, a physicist at Brookhaven National Lab and cofounder of the Theory Initiative.

But if the two virtual photons get caught in a quark loop, each converting to a virtual quark and virtual antiquark, they can form a blob of hadronic matter. If the virtual quarks and virtual antiquarks annihilate back into virtual photons, the two will appear to have bounced off of one another, interacting in a forbidden way.

Traditionally, hadronic corrections to were calculated using so-called dispersion relations. Physicists modeling the virtual blob of hadronic matter would turn to experiments where real blobs of hadronic matter were created. Real blobs are produced in experiments where electrons collide with positrons, creating a spray of hadronic matter. Experiments like BaBar, KLOE and now Belle II all provide this kind of data, which physicists have scoured to better understand the virtual blobs.

Recently, another method for calculating messy hadronic blobs has become viable, thanks to increasingly powerful computers and improved algorithms. Lattice QCD is a method for essentially simulating the blob from the ground up. Physicists write in the properties of the particles and the forces that govern them, set up a giant sandbox (a lattice) that the system can evolve in, and let it run. Lattice QCD is hugely computationally intensiveto produce a precise simulation, supercomputers have to calculate all of the gluon interchanges, a task that was impossible by hand.

Because its a simulation of the real world from first principles, its in that sense very similar to an experiment, according to Lehner.

One benefit is that physicists can be confident that their approach provides an answer to the question. The downsides, as in any experiment, are systematic errorsand the amount of resources required. Finding computer time is easier said than done, but at the end of the day, lattice QCD is approaching the precision of the dispersion relation method.

In February, a lattice QCD group claimed to have a result for hadronic contributions in serious conflict with the predictions of dispersive relations. Almost immediately, a flurry of other publications discussing and challenging the result followed. The June paper from the Theory Initiative does not address the potential inconsistency, but lattice QCD researchers are hard at work trying to replicate the result.

At the end of the day, when the experimentalists finish analyzing the data from the Muon g-2 experiment, theyll compare against the theoretical value to see if theres still a significant discrepancy. The hope, for many, is that they continue to disagree, opening a window for new physics.

Editor's note: The sentence"That's a difference of less than 3 parts per million, for those keeping score at home," has been updated to correct the number.

Link:

The many paths of muon math | symmetry magazine - Symmetry magazine

- Improving LIDAR and GPS: Breaking Through the Resolution Barrier With Quantum-Limited Precision - SciTechDaily - January 18th, 2021
- Amy Noelle Parks Brings The Romance of Math and Science To YA - The Nerd Daily - January 18th, 2021
- Surprising Discovery of Unexpected Quantum Behavior in Insulators Suggests Existence of Entirely New Type of Particle - SciTechDaily - January 18th, 2021
- If Wormholes Are Lurking in Our Universe, This Is How We Could Find Them - ScienceAlert - January 18th, 2021
- New quantum technology projects to solve mysteries of the universe - Open Access Government - January 14th, 2021
- Exploring the unanswered questions of our universe with quantum technologies - University of Birmingham - January 14th, 2021
- Wormholes may be lurking in the universe and new studies are proposing ways of finding them - The Conversation UK - January 14th, 2021
- University of Sheffield to lead multi-million pound project which could open up a new frontier in physics - University of Sheffield News - January 14th, 2021
- Raytheon UK part of team transforming the Royal Navy's technology, training and learning solutions - PRNewswire - January 14th, 2021
- Optical selection and sorting of nanoparticles according to quantum mechanical properties - Science Advances - January 14th, 2021
- The unhackable computers that could revolutionize the future - CNN - January 8th, 2021
- Birds Have a Mysterious 'Quantum Sense'. For The First Time, Scientists Saw It in Action - ScienceAlert - January 8th, 2021
- How understanding light has led to a hundred years of bright ideas - The Economist - January 8th, 2021
- Tokyo Institute of Technology: Quantum Mysteries: Probing an Unusual State in the Superconductor-Insulator Transition - India Education Diary - January 8th, 2021
- Quantum Nanodevice Can Be Both a Heat Engine and Refrigerator at the Same Time - SciTechDaily - January 8th, 2021
- Illumination at the limits of knowledge - The Economist - January 8th, 2021
- The top 20 most random things that happened in 2020: Nos. 16-20 - 104.3 The Fan - January 6th, 2021
- Detective Work in Theoretical Physics: Comprehensive Review of Physics of Interacting Particles - SciTechDaily - January 6th, 2021
- New Quantum-Based Distance Measurement Method for GPS and LIDAR - AZoQuantum - January 6th, 2021
- Raytheon Technologies Appoints Marie R. Sylla-Dixon as Chief Diversity Officer to Further Advance Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Initiatives -... - January 6th, 2021
- Quantum Superposition Evidenced by Measuring Interaction of Light with Vibration - AZoQuantum - December 24th, 2020
- Superpositions The Cosmic Weirdness of Quantum Mechanics - The Daily Galaxy --Great Discoveries Channel - December 24th, 2020
- Here's Why Quantum Computing Will Not Break Cryptocurrencies - Forbes - December 24th, 2020
- Irish researchers reveal how Santa delivers toys to billions in one night - BreakingNews.ie - December 24th, 2020
- Eight ways Argonne advanced science in 2020 - Newswise - December 24th, 2020
- Scaling the heights of quantum computing to deliver real results - Chinadaily.com.cn - China Daily - December 24th, 2020
- MIT's quantum entangled atomic clock could still be ticking after billions of years - SYFY WIRE - December 24th, 2020
- Matter Deconstructed: The Observer Effect and Photography - PetaPixel - December 24th, 2020
- Everything you need to know about quantum physics (almost ... - December 21st, 2020
- Quantum mechanics - Wikipedia - December 21st, 2020
- Six Things Everyone Should Know About Quantum Physics - December 21st, 2020
- Counter-Intuitive Quantum Mechanics: State of Vibration That Exists Simultaneously at Two Different Times - SciTechDaily - December 21st, 2020
- A state of vibration that exists simultaneously at two different times - Tech Explorist - December 21st, 2020
- This Incredible Particle Only Arises in Two Dimensions - Popular Mechanics - December 21st, 2020
- Quantum Mechanics, the Mind-Body Problem and Negative Theology - Scientific American - December 17th, 2020
- Quantum Interference Phenomenon Identified That Occurs Through Time - SciTechDaily - December 17th, 2020
- 9 Most Confusing Sci-Fi Movies That Feel Like You Need a PhD in Quantum Physics - FandomWire - December 17th, 2020
- Expanding the Scope of Electronic-Structure Theory - Physics - December 17th, 2020
- Physicists attempt to unify all forces of nature and rectify Einstein's biggest failure - Livescience.com - December 17th, 2020
- Black dwarf supernovae: The last explosions in the Universe - SYFY WIRE - December 17th, 2020
- Orford 17-year-old is among brightest young minds in north west - Warrington Guardian - December 17th, 2020
- Meet the kaon - Symmetry magazine - November 10th, 2020
- There Are Places in the World Where Rules Are Less Important Than Kindness by Carlo Rovelli review - The Guardian - November 10th, 2020
- Digging into the 3D Quantum Hall Effect - Physics - November 10th, 2020
- Physicists Circumvent 178-Year Old Theory to Cancel Magnetic Fields - SciTechDaily - November 10th, 2020
- A Modem With a Tiny Mirror Cabinet Could Help Connect The Quantum Internet - ScienceAlert - November 8th, 2020
- Quantum Technology: Harnessing the Power of Quantum Mechanics - Analytics Insight - November 8th, 2020
- Will the Universe Remember Us after We're Gone? - Scientific American - November 8th, 2020
- Threat of Quantum Computing to Bitcoin Should be Taken Seriously, But theres Enough Time to Upgrade Current Security Systems, Experts Claim -... - November 8th, 2020
- Pablo Jarillo-Herrero receives the Lise Meitner Distinguished Lecture and Medal - MIT News - November 8th, 2020
- Lighting up the ion trap - MIT News - November 8th, 2020
- For Thomas Searles, a passion for people and science at HBCUs and MIT - MIT News - November 8th, 2020
- University of Kansas Team Explore Heavy-Ion Particle Physics - Pagosa Daily Post - November 8th, 2020
- Reimagining the laser: new ideas from quantum theory could herald a revolution - The Conversation AU - October 29th, 2020
- Deep Reality: Art, Physics, the Unseeable and Space-Time - UNM Newsroom - October 29th, 2020
- Physicist breaks down the science of 11 iconic DC movie scenes - Insider - INSIDER - October 29th, 2020
- Q&A: Stanford MacArthur fellows talk creativity and 'publish or perish' - The Stanford Daily - October 29th, 2020
- Prime Minister's Prize for Science awarded to gravitational wave scientists - ABC News - October 29th, 2020
- Is math really the language of nature? This physicist is on a quest to find out. - News@Northeastern - October 29th, 2020
- Life and Work: Teaching in the Time of COVID: A Tale of Three Universities - All Together - Society of Women Engineers - October 29th, 2020
- COMMENTARY Covid seen to worsen poverty - The BVI Beacon - BVI Beacon - October 29th, 2020
- Quantum Time Twist Offers a Way to Create Schrdinger's Clock - Scientific American - October 24th, 2020
- Quantum Tunnels Show How Particles Can Break the Speed of Light - Quanta Magazine - October 24th, 2020
- A New Timekeeping Theory Reconciles Einstein's Relativity and Quantum Clocks - Science Times - October 24th, 2020
- Could Schrdingers cat exist in real life? We propose an experiment to find out - Scroll.in - October 24th, 2020
- Post-doctoral Fellow, Department of Physics job with THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG | 230760 - Times Higher Education (THE) - October 24th, 2020
- Province gives $11.8M to U of C for quantum research, other projects - Calgary Herald - October 24th, 2020
- Physicists clock the fastest possible speed of sound - Live Science - October 24th, 2020
- Column: A new era of electric vehicles could be on the way - Gainesville Times - October 24th, 2020
- Beyond Homo Sapiens A Slightly Different Roll of the Darwinian Dice (Weekend Feature) - The Daily Galaxy --Great Discoveries Channel - October 24th, 2020
- Diamonds Are a Quantum Scientist's Best Friend: Discovery May Revolutionize the High-Tech Industry - SciTechDaily - October 24th, 2020
- Sumit Das to Deliver 2019-20 A&S Distinguished Professor Lecture on 'Deconstructing Space-Time' - UKNow - October 24th, 2020
- Of Science, Philosophy and Revelation - Greater Kashmir - October 24th, 2020
- In Waterloo they're looking for nature's deepest and weirdest secrets - National Observer - October 24th, 2020
- Max Planck and the Birth of Quantum Mechanics - SciTechDaily - October 15th, 2020
- Reality Does Not Depend on the Measurer According to New Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics - SciTechDaily - October 15th, 2020
- Bringing the promise of quantum computing to nuclear physics - MSUToday - October 15th, 2020
- Could Schrdinger's cat exist in real life? Our research may soon provide the answer - The Conversation AU - October 15th, 2020
- A Force From Nothing Used to Control and Manipulate Objects - SciTechDaily - October 15th, 2020
- Facebook and Carnegie Mellon launch project to discover better ways to store renewable energy - VentureBeat - October 15th, 2020

## Recent Comments