After leaving the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) physics laboratory years ago, I crossed the Swiss-German border by high-speed train. Looking out the window of the carriage, I was enthralled by the scenes flashing by: a young couple embracing on an otherwise deserted platform, an old man standing by a rusty wagon with a missing wheel, two girls wading into a reedy pond. Each was just a few flickering frames, gone in the blink of an eye, but enough for my imagination to fill in a story.
I had just finished writing up some theoretical work on muon particlesheavier cousins to electronsand it was out for the scrutiny of my particle physics colleagues during peer review. There was a symmetry between my thoughts as I looked out the train window that day and the research I had been working on. I had been analyzing the flickering effects of unseen virtual particles on muons, aiming to use the clues from these interactions to piece together a fuller picture of our quantum universe. As a young theorist just launching my career, I had heard about proposed experiments to measure the tiny wobbles of muons to gather such clues. I had just spent my last few months at CERN working on an idea that could relate these wobbling muons to the identity of the missing dark matter that dominates our universe and other mysteries. My mind fast-forwarding, I thought, Greatnow I just have to wait for the experiments to sort things out. Little did I suspect that I would end up waiting for a quarter of a century.
Finally, this past April, I tuned in to a Webcast from my home institution, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) near Chicago, where scientists were reporting findings from the Muon g-2 (g minus two) experiment. Thousands of people around the world watched to see if the laws of physics would soon need to be rewritten. The Fermilab project was following up on a 2001 experiment that found tantalizing hints of the muon wobble effect I had been hoping for. That trial didnt produce enough data to be definitive. But now Muon g-2 co-spokesperson Chris Polly was unveiling the long-awaited results from the experiments first run. I watched with excitement as he showed a collection of new evidence that agreed with the earlier trial, both suggesting that muons are not acting as current theory prescribes. With the evidence from these two experiments, we are now very near the rigorous statistical threshold physicists require to claim a discovery.
What is this wobble effect that has me and other scientists so intrigued? It has to do with the way a muon spins when it travels through a magnetic field. This variation in spin direction can be affected by virtual particles that appear and disappear in empty space according to the weird rules of quantum mechanics. If there are additional particles in the universe beyond the ones we know about, they, too, will show up as virtual particles and exert an influence on a muons spin in our experiments. And this seems to be what we are seeing. The Fermilab experiment and its precursor measured a stronger wobble in muons spins than what we expect based on just the known particles. If the current discrepancy holds up, this will be the biggest breakthrough in particle physics since the discovery of the Higgs bosonthe most recent novel particle discovered. We might be observing the effects of particles that could help unveil the identity of dark matter or even reveal a new force of nature.
My romance with physics began when I was a child, gazing in amazement at the Via Lactea (the Milky Way) in the deep dark sky of Argentinas Pampas where I grew up. The same wonder fills me now. It is my job as a particle physicist to investigate what the universe is made of, how it works and how it began.
Scientists believe there is a simple yet elegant mathematical structure, based on symmetries of nature, that describes the way microscopic elementary particles interact with one another through the electromagnetic, weak and strong forces; this is the miracle of particle physics that scientists prosaically call the Standard Model. The distant stars are made of the same three elementary matter particles as our bodies: the electron and the up and down quarks, the two latter of which form protons and neutrons. Starlight is the result of the electromagnetic force acting between the charged protons and electrons, liberating light energy at the hot surface of the star. The heat source of these stars, including our sun, is the strong force, which acts on the protons and neutrons to produce nuclear fusion. And the weak force, which operates on both the quarks and the electrons, turns protons into neutrons and positively charged electrons and controls the rate of the first step in the fusion process. (The fourth force of nature, gravity, is not part of the Standard Model, although integrating it with the other forces is a major goal.)
Physicists assembled the Standard Model piece by piece over the course of decades. At particle accelerators around the world, we have been able to create and observe all of the particles that the mathematical structure requires. The last to be found, the Higgs boson, was discovered almost a decade ago at CERNs Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Yet we know the Standard Model is not complete. It does not explain, for example, the 85 percent of the matter in the universedark matterthat holds the cosmos together, making galaxies such as our Milky Way possible. The Standard Model falls short of answering why, at some early time in our universes history, matter prevailed over antimatter, enabling our existence. And the Muon g-2 experiment at Fermilab may now be showing that the Standard Model, as splendid as it is, describes just a part of a richer subatomic world.
The subject of the experimentmuonsare produced in abundance by cosmic rays in Earths atmosphere; more than 10,000 of them pass through our bodies every minute. These particles have the same physical properties as the familiar electron, but they are 200 times heavier. The extra mass makes them better probes for new phenomena in high-precision laboratories because any deviations from their expected behavior will be more noticeable. At Fermilab, a 50-foot-diameter ring of powerful magnets stores muons created under controlled conditions by smashing a beam of protons from a particle accelerator into a target of mostly nickel. This process produces pions, unstable composite particles that then decay into neutrinos and muons through weak force effects. At this point, the muons enter a ring filled with the vacuum of empty space.
Like electrons, muons have electric charge and a property we call spin, which makes them behave as little magnets. Because of the way they were created, when negatively charged muons enter the ring their spins point in the same direction as their motion, whereas for positively charged muons (used in the Fermilab experiment) the spins point in the opposite direction of their motion. An external magnetic field makes the electrically charged muons orbit around the ring at almost the speed of light. At the same time, this magnetic field causes the spin of the muons to precess smoothly like a gyroscope, as the particles travel around the ring, but with a small wobble.
The rate of precession depends on the strength of the muons internal magnet and is proportional to a factor that we call g. The way the equations of the Standard Model are written, if the muon didnt wobble at all, the value of g would be 2. If that were the case, the muons direction of motion and direction of spin would always be the same with respect to each other, and g-2 would be zero. In that case, scientists would measure no wobble of the muon. This situation is exactly what we would expect without considering the properties of the vacuum.
But quantum physics tells us that the nothingness of empty space is the most mysterious substance in the universe. This is because empty space contains virtual particlesshort-lived objects whose physical effects are very real. All the Standard Model particles we know of can behave as virtual particles as a result of the uncertainty principle, an element of quantum theory that limits the precision with which we can perform measurements. As a result, it is possible that for a very short time the uncertainty in the energy of a particle can be so large that a particle can spring into existence from empty space. This mind-blowing feature of the quantum world plays a crucial role in particle physics experiments; indeed, the discovery of the Higgs boson was enabled by virtual particle effects at the LHC.
Virtual particles also interact with the muons in the Fermilab ring and change the value of g. You can imagine the virtual particles as ephemeral companions that a muon emits and immediately reabsorbsthey follow it around like a little cloud, changing its magnetic properties and thus its spin precession. Therefore, scientists always knew that g would not be exactly 2 and that there would be some wobble as muons spin around the ring. But if the Standard Model is not the whole story, then other particles that we have not yet discovered may also be found in that cloud, changing the value of g in ways that the Standard Model cannot predict.
Muons themselves are unstable particles, but they live long enough inside the Muon g-2 experiment for physicists to measure their spin direction. Physicists do this by monitoring one of the decay particles they create: electrons, from decays of negatively charged muons, or positronsthe antiparticle version of electronsfrom decays of positively charged muons. By determining the energy and arrival time of the electrons or positrons, scientists can deduce the spin direction of the parent muon. A team of about 200 physicists from 35 universities and labs in seven countries developed techniques for measuring the muon g-2 property with unprecedented accuracy.
The first experiments to measure the muon g-2 took place at CERN, and by the late 1970s they had produced results that, within their impressive but limited precision, agreed with standard theory. In the late 1990s the E821 Muon g-2 experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory started taking data, with a similar setup to that at CERN. It ran until 2001 and got impressive results showing an intriguing discrepancy from the Standard Model calculations. It collected only enough data to establish a three-sigma deviation from the Standard Modelwell short of the five-sigma statistical significance physicists require for a discovery.
A decade later Fermilab acquired the original Brookhaven muon ring, shipped the 50-ton apparatus from Long Island to Chicago via highways, rivers and an ocean, and started the next generation of the Muon g-2 experiment. Nearly a decade after that, Fermilab announced a measurement of muon wobble with an uncertainty of less than half a part in a million. This impressive accuracy, achieved with just the first 6 percent of the expected data from the experiment, is comparable to the result from the full run of the Brookhaven trial. Most important, the new Fermilab results are in striking agreement with the E821 values, confirming that the Brookhaven findings were not a fluke.
To confirm this years results, we need not just more experimental data but also a better understanding of what exactly our theories predict. Over the past two decades we have been refining the Standard Model predictions. Most recently, more than 100 physicists working on the Muon g-2 Theory Initiative, started by Aida El-Khadra of the University of Illinois, have strived to improve the accuracy of the Standard Models value for the muon g-2 factor. Advances in mathematical methods and com putational power have enabled the most accurate theoretical calculation of g yet, taking into account the effects from all virtual Standard Model particles that interact with muons through the electromagnetic, weak and strong forces. Just months before Fermilab revealed its latest experimental measurements, the theory initiative unveiled their new calculation. The number disagrees with the experimental result by 4.2 sigma, which means that the chances that the discrepancy is purely a statistical fluctuation are about one in 40,000.
Still, the latest theoretical calculation is not iron-clad. The contributions to the g-2 factor governed by effects from the strong force are extremely difficult to compute. The Muon g-2 Theory Initiative used input from two decades of judiciously measured data in related experiments with electrons to evaluate these effects. Another technique, though, is to try to calculate the size of the effects directly from theoretical principles. This calculation is way too complex to solve exactly, but physicists can make approximations using a mathematical trick that discretizes our world into a gridlike lattice of space and time. These techniques have yielded highly accurate results for other computations where strong forces play a dominant role.
Teams around the world are tackling the lattice calculations for the muon g-2 factor. So far only one team has claimed to have a result of comparable accuracy to those based on experimental data from electron collisions. This result happens to dilute the discrepancy between the experimental and Standard Model expectationsif it is correct, there may not be evidence of additional particles tugging on the muon after all. Yet this lattice result, if confirmed by other groups, would itself conflict with experimental electron datathe puzzle then would be our understanding of electron collisions. And it would be hard to find theoretical effects that would explain such a result because electron collisions have been so thoroughly studied.
If the mismatch between Fermilabs measurements and theory persists, we may be glimpsing an uncharted world of unfamiliar forces, novel symmetries of nature and new particles. In the research I published 25 years ago searching for clues about the muons wobble, my collaborators and I considered a proposed property of nature called supersymmetry. This idea bridges two categories of particlesbosons, which can be packed together in large numbers, and fermions, which are antisocial and will share space only with particles of opposite spin. Supersymmetry postulates that each fermion matter particle of the Standard Model has a yet to be discovered boson particle superpartner, and each Standard Model boson particle also has an undiscovered fermion superpartner. Supersymmetry promises to unify the three Standard Model forces and offers natural explanations for dark matter and the victory of matter over antimatter. It may also explain the striking Muon g-2 results.
Just after the Fermilab collaboration announced its measurement, my colleagues Sebastian Baum, Nausheen Shah, Carlos Wagner and I posted a paper to a preprint server investigating this intriguing notion. Our calculations showed that virtual superparticles in the vacuum could make the muons wobble faster than the Standard Model predicts, just as the experiment saw. Even more exhilarating, one of those new particlescalled a neutralinois a candidate for dark matter. Supersymmetry can take numerous forms, many of them already ruled out by data from the LHC and other experimentsbut plenty of versions are still viable theories of nature.
The paper my team submitted was just one of more than 100 that have appeared proposing possible explanations for the Muon g-2 result since it was announced. Most of these papers suggest new particles that fall into one of two camps: either light and feeble or heavy and strong. The first category includes new particles that have masses comparable to or smaller than the muon and that interact with muons with a strength millions of times weaker than the electromagnetic force. The simplest theoretical models of this type involve new, lighter cousins of the Higgs boson or particles related to new forces of nature that act on muons. These new light particles and feeble forces could be hard to detect in terrestrial experiments other than Muon g-2, but they may have left clues in the cosmos. These light particles would have been produced in huge numbers after the big bang and might have had a measurable effect on cosmic expansion. The same ideathat light particles and feeble forces wrote a chapter missing from our current history of the universehas also been proposed to explain discrepancies in observations of the expansion rate of space, the so-called Hubble constant crisis.
The second category of explanations for the muon resultsheavy and stronginvolves particles with masses about as heavy as the Higgs boson (roughly 125 times the mass of a proton) to up to 100 times heavier. These particles could interact with muons with a strength comparable to the electromagnetic and weak interactions. Such heavy particles might be cousins of the Higgs boson, or exotic matter particles, or they might be carriers of a new force of nature that works over a short range. Supersymmetry offers some models of this type, so my youthful speculations at CERN are still in the running. Another possibility is a new type of particle called a leptoquarka strange kind of boson that shares properties with quarks as well as leptons such as the muon. Depending on how heavy the new particles are and the strength of their interactions with Standard Model particles, they might be detectable in upcoming runs of the LHC.
Some recent LHC data already point toward unusual behavior involving muons. Recently, for instance, LHCb (one of the experiments at the LHC) measured the decays of certain unstable composite particles similar to pions that produce either muons or electrons. If muons are just heavier cousins of the electron, as the Standard Model claims, then we can precisely predict what fraction of these decays should produce muons versus electrons. But LHCb data show a persistent three-sigma discrepancy from this prediction, perhaps indicating that muons are more different from electrons than the Standard Model allows. It is reasonable to wonder whether the results from LHCb and Muon g-2 are different, flickering frames of the same story.
The Muon g-2 experiment may be telling us something new, with implications far beyond the muons themselves. Theorists can engineer scenarios where new particles and forces explain both the muons funny wobbling and solve other outstanding mysteries, such as the nature of dark matter or, even more daring, why matter dominates over antimatter. The Fermilab experiment has given us a first glimpse of what is going on, but I expect it will take many more experiments, both ongoing and yet to be conceived, before we can confidently finish the story. If supersymmetry is part of the answer, we have a fair chance of observing some of the superparticles at the LHC. We hope to see evidence of dark matter particles there or in deep underground labs seeking them. We can also look at the behavior of muons in different kinds of experiments, such as LHCb.
All of these experiments will keep running. Muon g-2 should eventually produce results with nearly 20 times more data. I suspect, however, that the final measured value of the g-2 factor will not significantly change. There is still a shadow of doubt on the theory side that will be clarified in the next few years, as lattice computations using the worlds most powerful supercomputers achieve higher precision and as independent teams converge on a final verdict for the Standard Model prediction of the g-2 factor. If a big mismatch between the prediction and the measurement persists, it will shake the foundations of physics.
Muons have always been full of surprises. Their very existence prompted physicist I. I. Rabi to complain, Who ordered that? when they were first discovered in 1936. Nearly a century later they are still amazing us. Now it seems muons may be the messengers of a new order in the cosmos and, for me personally, a dream come true.
Go here to read the rest:
- Oregon-based artist makes disappearing sculptures inspired by physics - OregonLive - October 22nd, 2021
- Nanotech Solution: Research Unveils How Edgy Light on Graphene May Lead to Single Route of Information - Science Times - October 22nd, 2021
- The Mystery of the Cosmos: What Exactly Are We Looking For? - lareviewofbooks - October 22nd, 2021
- October: Bristol physicist lands prestigious award | News and features - University of Bristol - October 22nd, 2021
- Scientists decode mysteries of the brain with dark matter and the multiverse - CNET - October 22nd, 2021
- Purdue professors recognized with highest honor in their fields - Journal & Courier - October 22nd, 2021
- Physics Experiment Reveals Formation of a New State of Matter Breaks Time-Reversal Symmetry - SciTechDaily - October 22nd, 2021
- Harvard Astrophysicist Shares Wild Theory That Our Universe Was Created In A Lab By Aliens - BroBible - October 22nd, 2021
- Quantum computing pioneer Umesh Vazirani to give Cruickshank Lecture as part of three-day conference - EurekAlert - October 14th, 2021
- Chad Orzel, associate professor of physics and astronomy, honored as APS Fellow - Union College - October 14th, 2021
- Discovery Fund to Seed Local Innovation Ecosystem - Maryland Today - October 14th, 2021
- Woman's 'quantum immortality' theory that 'we never really die' freaks out TikTok users - The Mirror - October 14th, 2021
- Black holes and the multiverse: Decoding how physicists' brains work - CNET - October 14th, 2021
- New Universal Force Tested by Blasting Neutrons through Crystal - Scientific American - October 14th, 2021
- Ian MacCormack's PhD Thesis Defense | Department of Physics | The University of Chicago - UChicago News - October 14th, 2021
- Faith Q&A with Professor Brian F. Woodfield - The Daily Universe - Universe.byu.edu - October 14th, 2021
- What if the universe had no beginning? - Livescience.com - October 12th, 2021
- Novel Electronic Component Made of Germanium Bonded With Aluminum Could Be the Key to Quantum Technology - Science Times - October 12th, 2021
- IBM and Raytheon Technologies to Collaborate on Artificial Intelligence, Cryptography and Quantum Technologies - HPCwire - October 12th, 2021
- The neuroscience of advanced scientific concepts | npj Science of Learning - Nature.com - October 12th, 2021
- The 3 types of energy stored within every atom - Big Think - October 12th, 2021
- What's behind rising violent crime? Progressive prosecutors' non-enforcement of the law | TheHill - The Hill - October 12th, 2021
- The Week of October 11, 2021 - FYI: Science Policy News - October 12th, 2021
- Coldest Temperature Ever Recorded | What Is Absolute Zero? - Popular Mechanics - October 8th, 2021
- Quantum computing will break today's encryption standards - here's what to do about it - Verizon Communications - October 8th, 2021
- Scientists are using quantum computing to help them discover signs of life on other planets - ZDNet - October 8th, 2021
- New Fundamental Limit of Trapping and Exploiting Light at the Nanoscale - SciTechDaily - October 8th, 2021
- A novel way to heat and cool things - The Economist - October 8th, 2021
- The best way to win a Nobel is to get nominated by another laureate - The Economist - October 8th, 2021
- Top 10 Quantum Computing Workshop and Conferences to Attend in 2021 - Analytics Insight - October 8th, 2021
- A key part of the Big Bang remains troublingly elusive - Popular Science - October 8th, 2021
- RIT professor and team discover new method to measure motion of superfluids - RochesterFirst - October 6th, 2021
- Scientists discover spin polarization induced by shear flow - EurekAlert - October 2nd, 2021
- Physics - The Women Who Win - Physics - October 2nd, 2021
- The 5 Best Fall Books of 2021, According to Morning Brew Staffers - Morning Brew - October 2nd, 2021
- Singapores NUS and Thales to develop quantum technologies for commercial applications - Tech Wire Asia - October 2nd, 2021
- Physicists Probe Light Smashups To Guide Future Research Beyond the Standard Model - SciTechDaily - October 2nd, 2021
- New partnership between QEP and Thales to spur innovation in quantum security and quantum sensors - EurekAlert - September 30th, 2021
- NUS and Thales to develop quantum technologies - ComputerWeekly.com - September 30th, 2021
- Death, Physics and Wishful Thinking - Scientific American - September 30th, 2021
- Why Shares of Arqit Quantum Were Up Nearly 11% Today - Motley Fool - September 30th, 2021
- What Sonic Black Holes Can Teach Us About the Information Paradox - Interesting Engineering - September 30th, 2021
- Physics and comedy collide in Simon Stephens' play - Good Times Weekly - September 30th, 2021
- Black hole breakthrough as Einstein's theory challenged with find: 'Might need a new one' - Daily Express - September 30th, 2021
- Hagler Institute for Advanced Study Announces 10th Class of Fellows - Texas A&M University Today - September 30th, 2021
- Could the multiverse have parallel universes identical to ours? - Big Think - September 30th, 2021
- Niskayuna man believes he solved mystery of the universe - The Daily Gazette - September 30th, 2021
- University of Electro-Communications e-Bulletin: Radar-based human recognition for self-driving cars - PRNewswire - September 30th, 2021
- Press registration open for the virtual 2021 Fall Meeting of the APS Division of Nuclear Physics - EurekAlert - September 30th, 2021
- Are we approaching quantum gravity all wrong? - Big Think - September 19th, 2021
- Time Crystals dodge the second law of thermodynamics, Thanos style - PC Gamer - September 19th, 2021
- UArizona Engineer Awarded $5M to Build Quantum-Powered Navigation Tools - The University of Arizona Research - September 19th, 2021
- Geology Club to resume meetings on Thursday - Hot Springs Sentinel - September 19th, 2021
- Google's latest discovery changes the laws of physics - SwordsToday.ie - September 19th, 2021
- Ohio State-led QuSTEAM initiative awarded $5 million from NSF - The Ohio State University News - September 19th, 2021
- A Gem Of A Lab Will Bring World Of Quantum Physics Into The Light Eurasia Review - Eurasia Review - September 15th, 2021
- Physicists Create Swirling Tornado of Helium With First-Ever Atomic Vortex Beam - ScienceAlert - September 15th, 2021
- Vedika Khemani wins Breakthrough New Horizons Prize | Stanford News - Stanford University News - September 15th, 2021
- In an Accidental Discovery, Physicists Find that Black Holes Exert Pressure on their Environment | The Weather Channel - Articles from The Weather... - September 15th, 2021
- Matter that is both solid and liquid helps classical physics advance - Innovation Origins - September 15th, 2021
- Could fundamental physical constants not be constant across space and time? - Big Think - September 15th, 2021
- 1st 'atom tornado' created from swirling vortex of helium atoms - Livescience.com - September 15th, 2021
- Controlling the Phase Transition in Superfluid Helium-3 - Physics - September 15th, 2021
- Quantum Gas Experiment Creates the Coldest Temperature Ever - Interesting Engineering - September 15th, 2021
- The Godmother of the Digital Image - The New York Times - September 15th, 2021
- Just when you think youve got physics - The Guardian - September 6th, 2021
- Benjamn Labatuts When We Cease to Understand the World, Reviewed - The New Yorker - September 6th, 2021
- Young Australians share how they built careers in the middle of COVID pandemic - ABC News - September 6th, 2021
- Chinese scientists claim to have created a quantum radar that detects stealth planes by means of an electro... - Market Research Telecast - September 6th, 2021
- Top physics prizes awarded to UNSW researchers - UNSW Newsroom - September 6th, 2021
- Our Universe may have a fifth dimension that would change everything we know about physics - BBC Science Focus Magazine - September 6th, 2021
- Living by the week - The Times of India Blog - September 6th, 2021
- 'Need for Space': How Have Humans Benefited From Exploration of the Universe? - News18 - September 6th, 2021
- Quantum of solace: even physicists are still scratching their heads - The Guardian - September 4th, 2021
- Would Doctor Strange think of using a quantum crystal to reveal the secrets of dark matter? - SYFY WIRE - September 4th, 2021
- Physics - 3D Collimation of Matter Waves - Physics - September 4th, 2021
- Making OLED Displays In The Home Lab - Hackaday - September 4th, 2021
- Ask Ethan: What Impact Could Magnetic Monopoles Have On The Universe? - Forbes - September 4th, 2021
- New Physics Experiment Indicates There's No Objective Reality - Interesting Engineering - September 3rd, 2021
- New vortex beams of atoms and molecules are the first of their kind - Science News Magazine - September 3rd, 2021