Ann Coulter: Sordid tale of Jeffrey Epstein – The Bryan Times

* Part 2 of 2. (Part 1 in the Jan. 15 The Bryan Times)

Last week, we reviewed our ruling class's strange lack of interest in Jeffrey Epstein's child molestation ring, in which so many of them played a part. The media cover-up is second only to the government cover-up ... in cases they've been forced to bring (by the police and the public) against the child molester.

This week, we'll look at the government's long record of zealously trying NOT to unravel the case.

The local police presented then-Palm Beach state attorney Barry Krischer with bales of evidence. They had affidavits from dozens of witnesses: girls abused by the pederast, the women who recruited them, the butler who cleaned up sex toys after the "massages," as well as records of Epstein's molestation appointments, one delayed because of a victim's "soccer practice."

Pretty much everything we know today about Epstein's sex ring was unearthed by the Palm Beach Police back in 2005 and handed to Krischer on a silver platter.

According to an extensive review by The Palm Beach Post, most of Krischer's 2,800-page investigative file on the case consists of dirt against the teens -- and against the police -- given to him by Epstein's lawyers.

According to Nexis, only one newspaper, The Palm Beach Post, reported at the time -- or ever -- that Palm Beach prosecutor Krischer gave Epstein probation for his years of child abuse.

At that point, the enraged Palm Beach chief of police took his evidence to a completely separate law enforcement agency -- the federal government, even though these were mostly state crimes. U.S. attorney Alex Acosta proceeded to make a deal with Epstein -- with Krischer essentially operating as Epstein's defense counsel ...

According to journalist Vicky Ward, Acosta later defended this sweetheart deal to the Trump transition team, explaining: "I was told Epstein 'belonged to intelligence' and to leave it alone."

Most recently, the U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York brought a gentle prosecution against Epstein's pimp and fellow child molester, Ghislaine Maxwell. Most notably, the Southern District did not call the star witness, Virginia Giuffre, who has openly named the rich and powerful men she says these creeps forced her to have sex with, including Prince Andrew, former Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, former New Mexico governor and presidential candidate Bill Richardson, former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell, French model scout Jean-Luc Brunel, and the hedge fund billionaire Glenn Dubin, among others.

Immediately after the Southern District accidentally won five guilty verdicts against Maxwell, the prosecutors quietly revealed that, weeks earlier, they'd dismissed all charges against the prison guards who failed to check on Epstein for more than eight hours the night he allegedly committed suicide -- despite an explicit directive that they check on him every 30 minutes.

The feds not only did not move Epstein to a super-maximum security prison as some observers recommended, but they also: The day before Epstein died, he was taken off suicide watch; against orders, his cellmate transferred elsewhere, leaving Epstein completely alone in his cell; all the cameras on Epstein's floor were mysteriously broken.

Even the footage of his earlier suicide attempt had been mistakenly erased and the backup footage destroyed "as a result of technical errors," according to assistant U.S. attorneys Jason Swergold and Maurene Comey.

Maxwell is facing up to 65 years in prison, and her brother has just admitted she can name names. Hello? SDNY? Any thoughts about applying some pressure?

Most strange, the ink wasn't dry on the guilty verdicts before one of the jurors ran to the press and announced that he'd lied on his juror questionnaire.

Are prosecutors even investigating any contact between Maxwell's representatives and the jurors?

However this ends, once it's over, we'll never hear about Epstein again -- unlike, say, Jan. 6, which we will never stop hearing about. If America got to vote, which story do you think they would find more interesting?

Doesn't the public have a right to know how big Epstein's sex/blackmail club was, who among America's ruling elite were compromised, and to what end?

View original post here:
Ann Coulter: Sordid tale of Jeffrey Epstein - The Bryan Times

Comments are closed.