Page 1,271«..1020..1,2701,2711,2721,273..1,2801,290..»

At the Edge of Physics – Caltech

When new assistant professor of physics Lee McCuller was young, he liked to build things. His uncle made him a power supply, which he integrated with electronic hobby kits from RadioShack to do simple things like use analog circuits to switch lights and motors on and off. Today, McCuller tinkers with what some would call the most advanced measurement device in the world: LIGO, or the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory.

McCuller is an expert on quantum squeezing, a method used at LIGO to make incredibly precise measurements of gravitational waves that travel millions and billions of light-years across space to reach us. When black holes and collapsed stars, called neutron stars, collide, they generate ripples in space-time, or gravitational waves. LIGO's detectorslocated in Washington and Louisianaspecialize in picking up these waves but are limited by quantum noise, an inherent property of quantum mechanics that results in photons popping in and out of existence in empty space. Quantum squeezing is a complex method for reducing this unwanted noise.

Research into quantum squeezing and related measurements ramped up as far back as the 1980s, with key theorical studies by Caltech's Kip Thorne (BS '62), Richard P. Feynman Professor of Theoretical Physics, Emeritus, along with physicist Carl Caves (PhD '79) and others worldwide. Those theories inspired the first experimental demonstration of squeezing in 1986 by Jeff Kimble, the William L. Valentine Professor of Physics, Emeritus. The next decades saw many other advances in squeezing research, and now McCuller is at the leading edge of this innovative field. For example, he has been busy developing "frequency-dependent" squeezing that will greatly enhance LIGO's sensitivity when it turns back on in May of this year.

After earning his bachelor's degree from the University of Texas at Austin in 2010, McCuller attended the University of Chicago, where he earned his PhD in physics in 2015. There he began work on an experiment called the Fermilab Holometer, which looked for a speculative type of noise that would link gravity with quantum mechanics. It was during this project that McCuller met LIGO scientists, including MIT's Rai Weisswho together with Thorne and Barry Barish, the Ronald and Maxine Linde Professor of Physics, Emeritus, won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2017 for their groundbreaking work on LIGO. McCuller was inspired by Weiss and the LIGO project and decided to join MIT in 2016. He became an assistant professor at Caltech in 2022.

In the future, McCuller hopes to take the quantum measurement tools he has developed for LIGO and apply them to other problems. "If LIGO is the most precise ruler in the world, then we want to make those rulers available to everyone," he says.

We met with McCuller over Zoom to learn more about quantum squeezing and its future applications to other fields as well as what inspired McCuller to join Caltech.

After I graduated from University of Chicago in 2015, I went to work on LIGO at MIT. When I walked in the door, they were having a meeting about the first detection of gravitational waves! The public didn't know yet, but there had been rumors. It was exciting to learn the rumors were true, and it was nice to see everyone overjoyed that things were working.

There was a local experiment taking place at that time on using squeezed light in the frequency-dependent manner that will start up at LIGO later this year. My job was to help build the first full-scale demonstration of this. The group, before me, had previously demonstrated the concept but not at the full scale. I was there was to show exactly what would be needed to employ it in the LIGO observatories. This required a particularly challenging experimental setup.

At each of the observatory locations, LIGO uses laser beams to measure disturbances in space-timethe gravitational waves. The laser beams are shot out at 90-degrees from each other and travel down two 4-kilometer-long arms. They reflect off mirrors and travel back down the arms to meet back up. If a gravitational wave passes through space, it will stretch and squeeze LIGO arms such that the lasers will be pushed out of sync; when they meet back up, the combined laser will create an interference pattern.

At the quantum level, there are photons in the laser light that hit the mirrors at different times. We call this shot noise, or quantum noise. Imagine dumping out a can full of BBs. They all hit the ground and click and clack independently. The BBs are randomly hitting the ground, and that creates a noise. The photons are like the BBs and hit LIGO's mirrors at irregular times. Quantum squeezing, in essence, makes the photons arrive more regularly as if the photons are holding hands rather than traveling independently. And this means that you can more precisely measure the phase or frequency of the light inside LIGOand ultimately detect even fainter gravitational waves.

To squeeze light, we are basically pushing the uncertainty inherent in light waves from one feature to another. We are making the light more certain in its phase, or frequency, and less certain in its amplitude, or power [the uncertainty principle says that both the exact frequency and amplitude of a light wave cannot be known at the same time]. To really explain the details of how squeezing actually works is very hard! I primarily know how to use math to describe it.

An interesting thing about squeezed light is that we aren't doing anything to the actual laser. We don't even touch it. When we operate LIGO, we offset the arms so that its wave interference is not perfectly darka small amount of light gets through. The little bit of light that remains has an electrical field that interferes with quantum fluctuations in the vacuum, or empty space, and this leads to the shot noise or the photons acting like BBs as we talked about earlier. When we squeeze light, we are actually squeezing the vacuum so that the photons have lower uncertainty in their frequency.

Up until now, we have been squeezing light in LIGO to reduce uncertainty in the frequency. This allows us to be more sensitive to the high-frequency gravitational waves within LIGO's range. But if we want to detect lower frequencieswhich occur earlier in, say, a black hole merger, before the bodies collidewe need to do the opposite: we want to make the light's amplitude, or power, more certain and the frequency less certain. At the lower frequencies, the shot noise, our BB-like photons, push the mirrors around in different ways. We want to reduce that. Our new frequency-dependent cavity at the LIGO detectors is designed to reduce the frequency uncertainty in the high frequencies and the amplitude uncertainties in the low frequencies. The goal is to win everywhere and reduce the unwanted mirror motions.

Part of the reason this technology is more important in the next run is because we are turning up the power on our lasers. With more power, you get more pressure on the mirrors. Our new squeezing technology will allow us to turn the power up without creating the unwanted mirror motions.

What this means is that we will be even more sensitive to the early phases of black hole and neutron star mergers, and that we can see even fainter mergers.

One project I'm working on involves Kathryn Zurek and Rana Adhikari. We are building a tabletop-size detector that will attempt to pick up signatures of quantum gravity, or pixels in space and time as some people say. The idea there is to make interferometers more like high-energy-physics detectors. The detectors would click when something passes through it, largely circumventing the impacts of shot noise. I love the motivation of the projectquantum gravity, which is the quest to merge theories of gravity with quantum physics. It is a very lofty goal.

In general, what I hope to do is grow from the LIGO work and apply quantum measurement techniques to not only enhance the gravitational wave detectors but also to see where other fundamental physics experiments or technologies can be improved. I want to use quantum optics not necessarily for computation or for information but for measurement. Squeezing light is one of the first demonstrations of these concepts in a real experiment. The hope is that we can keep using these quantum techniques in more and more experiments. We want to take the advantages of LIGO and find all the places where we can apply them.

Caltech has a lot of mission-oriented scientists. It's not just about learning or demonstrating or exploringit's the mix of all these things. I like a place where the goal is to integrate technologies and do new experiments. Take LIGO for instance. Few people know how the whole thing works and many of them are here. Caltech is a place where people understand that what we are doing is hard. Good projects require both narrow and broad expertise, and a combination of the right people. The students are similarly motivated by both the science goals and the process. We are not just trying to build something that reliably works, we are also trying to build something that's at the edge of what is possible.

Read the original here:

At the Edge of Physics - Caltech

Read More..

Scientists explore why identity and history matter in science – CBC.ca

Ideas53:59Perimeter Institute Conversations About Science and Identity

You may wonder what the bizarre subatomic world of quantum physics or the fates of distant stars have to do with our everyday lives.

But even the strangest aspects of the universe make us who and what we are. And who we are, and where we come, from shape what we know and how we know it.

Quantum physicistShohini Ghose at Wilfrid Laurier University, andMi'kmaqastrophysicist Hilding Neilson at Memorial University were interviewed for the Conversations at the Perimeter podcast, produced by the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario. They discussed the connections between identity and science.

Perimeter Institute's Lauren Hayward and Colin Hunter interviewed both scientists.

You wrote a really nice article for Morals and Machines, andthe theme was how quantum can help us go beyond the binary. So what are some of the the ways that we can learn about non-binary thinking inspired by quantum mechanics?

Well, everything in quantum mechanics is about letting go of specifics and precision. The idea that science and the way we think about science can impact society is not new. As our science evolves, our social thinking also evolves.

For example, the Industrial Revolution and thinking around possessions and mass marketing and scales of how we think about things, as well as knowing exactly one thing or another that has all absolutely shaped the way we behave socially. So to me, it feels like whether we like it or not, this whole new revolution with new quantum technologies that actually harnesses these stranger properties of quantum...all of that is based on quantum ideas. But now we're getting to the parts that we were kind of ignoring, like the uncertainty and entanglement.

Perhaps in society too, we will naturally start expanding our choices from right and wrong to a more broader spectrum and not just right or wrong, or any time we try to have polar opposite kind of thinking I think perhaps that we will start evolving and we will get to newer ways and new approaches which can influence so many aspects of our behaviour, whether we're choosing what we want to eat at a restaurant versus our politics and our policies, and so many, many aspects of our identities.

Ghose'sforthcoming book,Her Time, Her Space: How Trailblazing Women Scientists Decoded theUniverse,will be published this fall.

Can you talk about whatastro-colonialismis?

When we talk about astronomy and science and space, wetalk about them in terms of a certain perspective, and that perspective tends to be Eurocentric.

So for instance,the constellations in the northern hemisphere, we have the Big Dipper or Ursa major. We have Cassiopeia, Cepheus, we have Draco, and they all come from this one historical context, largely Greek and Roman astronomy.

And the Greeks and Romans told great stories about these things. And as you travel through time, those constellations sort of get maintained through star maps and European courts. It became part of the navigation in the oceans when we had first colonization of the Americas and then the slave trade. And they kept existing until the 20th century when the International Astronomical Union formed, which was great. It was supporting astronomy worldwide, but at the time it was essentially a bunch of white dudes from Europe, and they formed a committee to simplify the night sky and have 88 constellations.

There are people around the world, whether it's in Asian countries, in Asian regions, in the North, Northern Europe, Indigenous peoples in the Americas, Indigenous peoples who have their own stories [their] own constellations. We don't see them anymore. I open a textbook. I see Ursa major I don't see my constellations from Mi'kmaq or Haudenosaunee constellations or Salish or Inuit constellations. That's erasing our stories, and that's colonialism.

Then we have the future of colonialism, which is going to space. The way we do space exploration and space settlement is the exact same narrative that we did when Canada, the U.S., was being settled the pioneer, the frontiersmanship, man versus nature element.

Tell us just a little bit about your own personal relationship with the night sky.

I'm Mi'kmaq from Newfoundland. And we didn't grow up in an Indigenous community because lost settlements were more spread out across the island. So I grew up basically in suburbia watching Mr. Dressup and MuchMusic. So I didn't really have a strong connection with my heritage and where I come from.

One of the best parts of the Western coastline other than Gros Morne and the skiing is the clear night skies, seeing the Milky Way and all the stars, meteor showers and you feel you see this blanket of stars, it feels like home.

Listen to both of these interviewswherever you get your favourite podcasts or click onthe play button above

*This episode was produced by Chris Wodskou.

Read the original post:

Scientists explore why identity and history matter in science - CBC.ca

Read More..

Titans connects every DC show, movie in big Beast Boy multiverse scene – Polygon

Titans says DO cross the streams

The multiverse, every mega-franchises (and Oscar-winning non-franchise) favorite idea can often seem like homework. Why, it is reasonable to wonder, does every other blockbuster movie ticket come with a five-minute lecture on quantum physics for casuals? It doesnt have to be this way. Instead, the multiverse can just be like it is on the most recent episode of Titans: a goofy nod to a long-running franchises history that is great fun but ultimately not that vital to the experience.

With the all-timer episode title Dude, Wheres My Gar?, Titans which resumed its fourth and final season after a five-month hiatus this month sends Beast Boy, a.k.a. Gar Logan (Ryan Potter) on a metaphysical trip across the DC multiverse. Hes being coached by Dominic Mndawe/Freedom Beast on how to connect with The Red, the DC Universes cosmic force that ties together all animal life, and counterpart to The Green, which connects all plant life.

This results in Gar getting briefly lost in the multiverse, where he glimpses mostly through archival footage and audio numerous DC film and television adaptations, including Cesar Romeros Joker, Grant Gustins Flash, Zachary Levis Shazam, and even animated Beast Boy from Teen Titans Go!. He also meets a few characters in the flesh, namely Stargirl (Brec Bassinger) and being reunited with Cyborg from Doom Patrol.

Gars trip through the multiverse isnt as expansive or ambitious as the Arrowverses truly bonkers Crisis on Infinite Earths crossover its more of an Easter egg than a big event but theres a sense of fun to it that makes it a counterweight to the grave stakes of something like the MCUs Multiverse Saga.

It also helps that DC has a multiverse to speak of since the company has never worked as hard (or as successfully) as its competitor to craft a continuous cinematic universe, it can just retroactively label every DC TV and film property as part of the multiverse. And, according to my copy of Quantum Physics for Dummies, that all makes perfect sense.

Read more

See the article here:

Titans connects every DC show, movie in big Beast Boy multiverse scene - Polygon

Read More..

Experiments show that edges are not needed to realize an unusual quantum effect – Phys.org

This article has been reviewed according to ScienceX's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

RIKEN physicists have created an exotic quantum state in a device with a disk-like geometry for the first time, showing that edges are not required. This demonstration opens the way for realizing other novel electronic behavior. Their findings are published in Nature Physics.

Physics has long moved on from the three classic states of matter: solid, liquid and gas. A better theoretical understanding of quantum effects in crystals and the development of advanced experimental tools to probe and measure them has revealed a whole host of exotic states of matter.

A prominent example of this is the topological insulator: a kind of crystalline solid that exhibits wildly different properties on their surfaces than in the rest of the material. The best-known manifestation of this is that topological insulators conduct electricity on their surfaces but are insulating in their interiors.

Another manifestation is the so-called quantum anomalous Hall effect.

Known for more than a century, the conventional Hall effect arises when an electric current flowing through a conductor is deflected from a straight line by a magnetic field applied at right angles to the current. This deflection produces a voltage across the conductor (and a corresponding electrical resistance).

In some magnetic materials, this phenomenon can arise even when a magnetic field is not applied, which is called the anomalous Hall effect.

"The anomalous Hall resistance can become very large in topological insulators," explains Minoru Kawamura of the RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science. "At low temperatures, the anomalous Hall resistance increases and reaches a fundamental value, while the resistance along the current direction becomes zero." This is the quantum anomalous Hall effect, and it was first observed in the lab nearly a decade ago.

Now, Kawamura and his colleagues have demonstrated an effect known as Laughlin charge pumping in a quantum anomalous Hall insulator.

The team fabricated a donut-shaped disk made of layers of different magnetic topological insulators. They then measured how the electric current through the device responded to an alternating magnetic field generated by metal electrodes on the inner and outer curves of the donut.

The researchers observed that this field led to electric charge accumulating at the ends of the cylinder. This is Laughlin charge pumping.

Previous demonstrations of quantum anomalous Hall insulators used rectangular devices that included edges connecting the electrodes. And it was thought that electronic states in these edges were crucial for supporting the quantum anomalous Hall insulator.

But the team's finding overturns this assumption. "Our demonstration of Laughlin charge pumping in a quantum anomalous Hall insulator uses a disk-shaped device without edge channels connecting the two electrodes," says Kawamura. "Our result raises the possibility that other exciting electronic phenomena can be realized in quantum anomalous Hall materials."

More information: Minoru Kawamura et al, Laughlin charge pumping in a quantum anomalous Hall insulator, Nature Physics (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41567-022-01888-2

Journal information: Nature Physics

Read more:

Experiments show that edges are not needed to realize an unusual quantum effect - Phys.org

Read More..

It’s too soon to dump string theory | Tasneem Zehra Husain – IAI

String theorys unexpected and robust mathematical relationships may hold the key to understanding the universe, even if they don't neatly fit our current understanding of reality, writes Tasneem Zehra Husain.

Is string theory worth pursuing? This question, like the perennial Jack-in-the-Box, never stays down for long and - like said toy - creates a commotion every time it arises. Before calm is (temporarily) restored, it seems there are certain tunes that must be played. Typically, heres how it goes:

Critics dismiss string theory on the charge that its not science. A successful scientific theory must incorporate known physical phenomena and make verifiable predictions about the natural world. String theory hasnt, so its just a fantasy, they say; it should be abandoned. Proponents argue this assessment is superficial. They agree that concrete, testable, predictions are an essential feature of a mature theory - and remain an active goal of research - but string theory is still growing. It is not old enough to be oracular. More time is needed, they say; condemning it now would be premature.

SUGGESTED READINGEric Weinstein: The String Theory WarsBy Alexis Papazoglou

You have had decades, the critics object. String theorists respond with a list of the many times this has happened before. From atoms (postulated two and a half millennia before being observed), to gravitational waves (detected a hundred years after prediction), the Higgs boson (found after a half-century long search), quantum entanglement (an empirically falsifiable prediction took three decades to formulate; verification took two more), and countless others. String theory would not be the first theory to ask for a bit of patience, and none has ever had better reason! Lest it be drowned out by the noise, string theorists reiterate the magnitude of the problem at hand. They are attempting to obtain the fundamental equations that encompass everything which unfolds in the universe - from the Big Bang to now, from light years to the Planck length - and then, they need to figure out how to test the implications of these equations.

Todays state-of-the-art technology can probe length scales up to 10^-17cm; the Planck length is ten million billion times smaller. Direct experimental verification is obviously not an option, but the complications of string theory are not limited to technology. Mathematically, too, the theory is immensely complex - more intricate than anything else we have chanced upon. It is any wonder that progress is slow, string theorists ask.

From here on, it plays out much as you might expect. Arguments and counterarguments weave back and forth until the landscape makes an appearance and - at the mention of these 10^500 (or so) possible universes the theory describes - we reach the crescendo.

___

They are attempting to obtain the fundamental equations that encompass everything which unfolds in the universe - from the Big Bang to now, from light years to the Planck length - and then, they need to figure out how to test the implications of these equations

___

The discussion is so animated, so diverting, that its easy to lose track of the fact that when we debate whether or not string theory is true, we limit ourselves to only one kind of truth. Most evaluations of string theory are based on how well it describes, explains, and predicts observations; in short, on physical truth. This is - as it should be - the central criterion. Physics is, after all, the study of what manifests, not a catalog of what could have been. The importance of physical truth is obvious and uncontested. What is mentioned far less often, is mathematical truth; this too, plays a role.

Just to be clear, physical and mathematical truths cannot - and should not - be conflated. They are neither equivalent nor interchangeable. Every mathematical equation need not be physically realized, but the converse does not hold. Every observable phenomenon is, simply by virtue of existing, a logically consistent system and therefore, mathematically expressible in principle.

But not yet in practice. Certain physical phenomena - black holes for instance - refuse to be rendered mathematically by the tools we currently have at our disposal. The equations evade us, but they exist. How do we know this? Because black holes do not cause the universe to implode. Had the laws of black holes been incompatible with the physics of the rest of the universe, one - or both - would collapse. But the universe exists, and black holes exist within it; so the equations governing black holes should exist also, as part of the mathematical framework that undergirds the universe. Neither quantum field theory nor general relativity rises to the challenge.

SUGGESTED VIEWINGThe code to the cosmosWith Marika Taylor, Peter Woit, Arif Ahmed, David Malone

We know exactly what the problem is: quantum field theory and general relativity - each unprecedentedly successful in their own domains (the former rules the very small, the latter the very heavy) - are fundamentally incompatible. As long as we restrict ourselves to systems that are either very small or very heavy - which, arguably, covers most of the universe - everything works out beautifully. There are, however, a few exotic places where the theories overlap; places where so many secrets are squeezed into tiny spaces that the very small becomes the very heavy. Here, where the deepest structure of the universe is revealed - at the big bang, or inside black holes - where both theories should hold sway, neither utters anything remotely coherent.

It is clear that we need a new paradigm. What isnt nearly as clear, is how we should go about obtaining it. The attitudes and assumptions of our two reigning theories are so different, it is difficult to imagine how they could be reconciled. Heres the crux of the issue: Quantum field theory describes the interactions of fundamental particles against a fixed space-time; should all the world be a stage, elementary particles would be the players and quantum field theory the script. But in general relativity, spacetime - the stage - is responsive and continually reacts to what unfolds upon it. In the vast majority of situations, we can get away with applying either quantum field theory, or general relativity; we pick either a play enacted upon a static stage, or a graceful dance in an ever-changing arena.

Should we try to implement both theories together, we create an untenable situation - a true postmodern nightmare! Each step the actors take, every gesture they make, causes the sets and stage to morph. With the ground moving under their feet, actors scramble to adapt to this transforming environment; their actions are modified constantly to keep pace with the shifting context, and the script is perpetually rewritten to somehow make sense. It doesnt. No matter how artfully we construct their lines, all the actors end up screaming infinities.

___

The discussion is so animated, so diverting, that its easy to lose track of the fact that when we debate whether or not string theory is true, we limit ourselves to only one kind of truth

___

A simple mashup just does not work. If we are ever to achieve a coherent formulation of quantum gravity, we need an entirely novel approach. But where will this come from? If we insist on taking our cue only from that which we know that which is physically realized - we are at a dead end. We have exhausted our intuition. In order to navigate the uncharted waters we now face, we will need to access an as yet untapped source of mathematical truths.

Or, we could just choose to stay on familiar land.

* * * * * * * * * *

One of the deep mysteries of mathematics is that, simply by requiring stability and consistency, we arrive at structures that seem imbued with an inner knowing. Time and again, we start to write, only to find our pens moving in invisible grooves, tracing figures we had not envisioned, uncovering consequences we could not have foreseen. Dirac set out to express the dynamics of an electron in a manner consistent with special relativity - but his equations held also the positron, paving the path for all of antimatter. The elegant equations of general relativity, so satisfyingly spare on the surface, hid black holes, left space for a cosmological constant, and prophesied gravitational waves - none of which was expected or even, initially, welcome. The annals of physics are full of such stories.

It feels like an incredible gift each time we are lifted to these foreign places we would never have reached on foot. Once we arrive, we chart the terrain, plot paths, add them to our maps, and work out ways to get there again. Future expeditions may be planned and purposeful, but that first time - when we have no idea where we will end up - there is a definite sense of being carried. In all our years of traveling by equation, string theory is by far the most extravagant structure we have encountered.

SUGGESTED READINGString theory is deadBy Peter Woit

For an arrangement this intricate to be stable is an incredible feat in itself. Had it been nothing but a house of cards, the very fact that it stands would be commendable - but string theory has proved to be robust, even load-bearing. The architecture is unfamiliar but the design is remarkably self-consistent. The unexpected flourishes, the peculiar shapes which curve in on, and around, themselves - they all fit together seamlessly. Moreover, string theory displays a tensile strength we could not have anticipated. We have thrown problems at it, and it has grown to accommodate them; most equations would have simply collapsed under the weight. Such stability is only possible in a structure that is mathematically true.

It is an oft-told story, how strings were first uncovered by accident, on a dig for a theory of the strong interaction. They never quite belonged because no matter how you rubbed them, you just could not remove the peculiar glint from their surface It took a while for people to recognize this glint as gravity, but once that happened, there was massive jubilation. String theory, it was thought, heralded the ultimate answer. It would show us a way to not only bridge quantum field theory and gravity, but unify them. It would lead us to a place from where all the matter and forces in the universe would appear to be notes played by a string; all we know, all we can know, arising from a vibrating strand of energy. At least, that was the idea.

Things didnt quite turn out that neatly.

Equations can be quite chatty if you let them, and to those who listened, string theory had plenty to say. Its true, what the critics allege - strings did not do what we asked of them; they did more. They enlarged the space of what we thought possible. Nestled in the nooks and crannies of string theory were problems we had not prepared for, elements we could not have expected - an entire menagerie of issues was unleased; the process of taming them is an ongoing education. But, amid all the creative chaos, there have also been answers - whispered answers to questions we didnt even know to ask.

___

For an arrangement this intricate to be stable is an incredible feat in itself. Had it been nothing but a house of cards, the very fact that it stands would be commendable - but string theory has proved to be robust, even load-bearing

___

No one expected the theory to be correct in its initial formulation. The name is merely historic. We always knew strings could not take us to a full-blown theory of quantum gravity on their own - but in a fascinating twist, they led us to the things that might. Until string theory came along, we had only a point-particle view of the universe, which - it turns out - was very restrictive. Strings had a whole new umwelt. They saw and showed us - so much more than particles could. Open strings, probing space with mathematical tentacles, found their endpoints getting stuck in certain places; through their motion, they sketched the shapes of these invisible traps, thus revealing a whole family of higher dimensional membranes that until then, lay hidden.

String theory has offered up many revolutionary ideas - extra dimensions, large and small, and a possible explanation for black hole entropy among them - but one particular triumph is the discovery of duality. A duality is when two apparently unrelated theories - potentially containing different particles, different dynamics, operating in space-times of different shapes and dimensions - describe physically equivalent content. Or, to flip this around: duality says that the same physical situation can be modeled equally well in two unrecognizably different ways. Whats more, the descriptions work in concert with each other. Questions asked of one theory may be answered by appealing to the other. Its as if the script of a play was equivalent to the score of a symphony, and by listening to the music, actors could learn their lines and take stage directions.

The insights obtained from string theory may have emerged in the unrealistic contexts of AdS space (which we dont inhabit) or supersymmetric black holes (which cannot exist in our present universe), but the relationships they describe are not necessarily limited to those situations. At the very least, they tell us that certain arrangements and interdependencies are possible; ideally, they will turn out to be preliminary sketches - or even blueprints - for the physical world.

SUGGESTED VIEWINGFrom one universe to the nextWith Roger Penrose

This may sound like wishful thinking, but in fact the history of physics is replete with such examples. Heres one of my favorites. Imaginary numbers do not, by definition, exist in the world around us. If the purpose of numbers is solely to quantify objects in the physical world, imaginary numbers make no sense at all - and yet, they are absolutely essential in formulating the equations of both quantum field theory and general relativity. Where i on its own may be dismissed as a flight of fancy, the abstract relationship it represents is enacted over and over again in the physical world.

A mathematically consistent framework is larger than, and independent of, the context from which it emerges. It is proof that a certain set of relationships, a particular pattern of evolution, is possible - that it is logically sound and structurally stable. The identities of those who enact these relationships is irrelevant. Symbols are roles anyone can step into, as long as the choreography of the equations is obeyed. It is, thus, entirely possible to extract mathematical truths from situations that are physically unrealized - even unrealistic - and store them as models, building up a library to consult when you encounter previously unmapped phenomena.

We stand today upon a cliff edge, facing what appears to be complete chaos. We are unable to identify any forms - not because they do not exist, but because we see only that which we have trained ourselves to see. What we behold now is completely new, and so we must learn to see again. If we are to articulate what lies ahead, we need a new lexicon of words to hold these amorphous realities. We need new patterns to connect what we find here, new templates to measure against, a new list of possible interactions.

___

If the purpose of numbers is solely to quantify objects in the physical world, imaginary numbers make no sense at all - and yet, they are absolutely essential in formulating the equations of both quantum field theory and general relativity

___

We need an entirely new set of models to contain this strangeness, but where, and how, do we look for something when we have no idea what it looks like? There is no prescribed path, no plan to follow, no way to mount a targeted search. Instead, we must wander, leaving ourselves open to serendipitous encounters, paying attention to whatever it is we find. If the romance of this quest does not appeal, it may help to remember that, while this may not be the most efficient way forward, we dont know any other.

String theory has proved to be a veritable trove of mathematical treasure. Odd objects to be sure, but fascinating - and in the spirit of discovery, we study them. We may not know what purpose, if any, they will serve but we are in no rush to use them; they are stable, they will keep. Our mathematical cabinet of curiosities expands as, one by one, we place this motley assortment on our shelves, in the hope that one day in the future, sitting at our desk, turning over some unidentifiable phenomenon in our hands, we will hold it up to the light and find its contours eerily familiar. Perhaps there will be a moment of recognition. Perhaps we will spring to the cabinet, pull down a model from the shelves, dust it off - and see that we already have exactly what we need.

Here is the original post:

It's too soon to dump string theory | Tasneem Zehra Husain - IAI

Read More..

QuintessenceLabs’ qStream Entropy-as-a-Service (EaaS) Solution Delivers Truly Random Numbers for Encrypti – Benzinga

April 24, 2023 9:03 AM | 2 min read

Visit QuintessenceLabs at RSAC in Booth #355 in Moscone Center, South Hall

CANBERRA, Australia and SAN FRANCISCO , April 24, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- QuintessenceLabs, a leader in the quantum cybersecurity industry, is showcasing its qStream Entropy-as-a-Service (EaaS) solution this week at RSAC.

Enter your email and you'll also get Benzinga's ultimate morning update AND a free $30 gift card and more!

Random numbers are at the core of most decryption algorithms, and it is important for security that the output from random number generators is both unpredictable and has a high enough throughput for commercial use. QuintessenceLabs' qStreamquantum random number generator (QRNG) delivers numbers with full entropy at 1 Gbit/sec, providing both randomness and speed critical for maximum security.

How to Trade Options Like a Pro...

It's time to separate the winners from the losers. Options expert Chris Capre is about to drop his next two options plays that have the potential to score double and triple-digit gains.

The qStream QRNG uses quantum physics to create truly random numbers as opposed to the pseudo-random number generators on the market today making them virtually unhackable, even by quantum computers. This is critical for sensitive applications where maximum security is desired. The qStream QRNG delivers random numbers through the industry-standard OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP), enabling interoperability with any conformant key management server, including QuintessenceLabs' Trusted Security Foundation (TSF) key and policy manager.

"When it comes to data security, the quality of random numbers has a significant impact on the success of encryption and overall security. True entropy is critical in providing secure encryption keys," said Skip Norton, VP of Business Development for QuintessenceLabs. "Unlike pseudo-random number generators, which don't use quantum science, qStream creates true entropy so the numbers it generates can't be re-created by criminals seeking to compromise encryption."

For more information on qStream quantum random number generator (QRNG) visit QuintessenceLabs at RSAC, Booth #355, Moscone Center, South Hall.

About QuintessenceLabsAustralian-based QuintessenceLabs is a global leader in quantum cybersecurity recognized for its advanced quantum-safe data protection capabilities. The company has been widely recognized for its cybersecurity innovations around the world, most recently through its selection as a World Economic Forum Global Innovator as well as winning a prestigious 2022 CyberTech100 Award. QuintessenceLabs offers a suite of unrivaled quantum enabled cybersecurity solutions and services which help organizations mitigate traditional and quantum cyber risk today and the quantum computing threats of tomorrow.For more information on QuintessenceLabs, visit our website, or follow the company on LinkedIn.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/quintessencelabs-qstream-entropy-as-a-service-eaas-solution-delivers-truly-random-numbers-for-encryption-keys-301804333.html

SOURCE QuintessenceLabs

2023 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

See the article here:

QuintessenceLabs' qStream Entropy-as-a-Service (EaaS) Solution Delivers Truly Random Numbers for Encrypti - Benzinga

Read More..

Better superconductors with palladium – Science Daily

It is one of the most exciting races in modern physics: How can we produce the best superconductors that remain superconducting even at the highest possible temperatures and ambient pressure? In recent years, a new era of superconductivity has begun with the discovery of nickelates. These superconductors are based on nickel, which is why many scientists speak of the "nickel age of superconductivity research." In many respects, nickelates are similar to cuprates, which are based on copper and were discovered in the 1980s.

But now a new class of materials is coming into play: In a cooperation between TU Wien and universities in Japan, it was possible to simulate the behaviour of various materials more precisely on the computer than before. There is a "Goldilocks zone" in which superconductivity works particularly well. And this zone is reached neither with nickel nor with copper, but with palladium. This could usher in a new "age of palladates" in superconductivity research. The results have now been published in the scientific journal Physical Review Letters.

The search for higher transition temperatures

At high temperatures, superconductors behave very similar to other conducting materials. But when they are cooled below a certain "critical temperature," they change dramatically: their electrical resistance disappears completely and suddenly they can conduct electricity without any loss. This limit, at which a material changes between a superconducting and a normally conducting state, is called the "critical temperature."

"We have now been able to calculate this "critical temperature" for a whole range of materials. With our modelling on high-performance computers, we were able to predict the phase diagram of nickelate superconductivity with a high degree of accuracy, as the experiments then showed later," says Prof. Karsten Held from the Institute of Solid State Physics at TU Wien.

Many materials become superconducting only just above absolute zero (-273.15C), while others retain their superconducting properties even at much higher temperatures. A superconductor that still remains superconducting at normal room temperature and normal atmospheric pressure would fundamentally revolutionise the way we generate, transport and use electricity. However, such a material has not yet been discovered. Nevertheless, high-temperature superconductors, including those from the cuprate class, play an important role in technology -- for example, in the transmission of large currents or in the production of extremely strong magnetic fields.

Copper? Nickel? Or Palladium?

The search for the best possible superconducting materials is difficult: there are many different chemical elements that come into question. You can put them together in different structures, you can add tiny traces of other elements to optimise superconductivity. "To find suitable candidates, you have to understand on a quantum-physical level how the electrons interact with each other in the material," says Prof. Karsten Held.

This showed that there is an optimum for the interaction strength of the electrons. The interaction must be strong, but also not too strong. There is a "golden zone" in between that makes it possible to achieve the highest transition temperatures.

Palladates as the optimal solution

This golden zone of medium interaction can be reached neither with cuprates nor with nickelates -- but one can hit the bull's eye with a new type of material: so-called palladates. "Palladium is directly one line below nickel in the periodic table. The properties are similar, but the electrons there are on average somewhat further away from the atomic nucleus and each other, so the electronic interaction is weaker," says Karsten Held.

The model calculations show how to achieve optimal transition temperatures for palladium data. "The computational results are very promising," says Karsten Held. "We hope that we can now use them to initiate experimental research. If we have a whole new, additional class of materials available with palladates to better understand superconductivity and to create even better superconductors, this could bring the entire research field forward."

Link:

Better superconductors with palladium - Science Daily

Read More..

Quantum computing poised to transform healthcare – Healthcare Finance News

Dr. Frederik Floether, left, and Dr. Numan Laanait speak about quantum computing at the HIMSS23 global conference in Chicago on Wednesday.

Photo: Jeff Lagasse/Healthcare Finance News

CHICAGO Quantum computing reached a milestone in 2022 when a 400-plus qubit machine was demonstrated at a time when experts were questioning the feasibility of even a 100 qubit system. The question is no longer whether quantum computing will speed up applications in the world of healthcare it's now a matter of when.

A qubit (or quantum bit) is the basic unit of information in quantum computing. The number of qubits matters, because the more qubits, the more computing power can grow exponentially. In terms of healthcare, this has emerging possibilities in the realm of machine learning.

The quantum community has discovered problems that can't be handled with classical machine learning, but are efficiently solvable on quantum computers. That means it's only a matter of time before the technology has real-world value.

Dr. Frederik Floether, lead quantum and deputy CEO of QuantumBasel, and Dr. Numan Laanait, senior director of engineering at Elevance Health, told an audience at the HIMSS23 global conference in Chicago Wednesday that quantum computers are based on a model entirely different than that of its classical counterparts.

"It's not the difference between CPU and GPU," said Laanait. "The entire computational model is different. The part that's relevant is, in a classical computer, if you increase the number of bits by a factor of 10, the amount of information you can process increases by a factor of 10. In quantum computing, it increases by 1,000, and it increases exponentially with the number of quantum bits."

According to Floether, that's the reason why there's such excitement around the technology: Quantum is the only computational model that can be exponentially faster than classical computers.

"The journey is a continuous one," he said. "Considering that this is such a fundamentally different technology, it requires time to build those skills, build those solutions and get into a quantum state of mind."

A sign of growing maturity in the field, they said, is that major companies and smaller players alike now have roadmaps; Intel, Microsoft and IBM are some of the heavy hitters with quantum plans. They're planning to cale the technology, and IBM in particular has hit every one of its milestones, and is projected to have a 4,000 qubit machine in the coming years.

"These machines are so complex that you cannot simulate them classically," said Laanait. "They're already past that threshold."

At this point, not every problem can be solved in a quantum manner. It's critical, said Floether, to do careful mapping between potential use cases. Current problems at which quantum computing currently excels include processing data with a complex structure, simulation and optimization.

Where quantum computing can really shine is in kernel-based machine learning. A kernel, a math function applied to data, can allow people to see more structure in their data.

"If you were to project it to an even higher function, you'd see even more structure, even more patterns in your data," said Laanait. "With quantum computers you can go to a million kernels."

The software is one thing. But that software doesn't have much value unless it has the hardware that can run it, and that's where the technology still has some catching up to do. But as the tech gets better, the data will get better.

To date, said Floether, health data is about 60 to 80% accurate in terms of data classification in classical models. The early results on quantum computing are powerful, showing the ability to outperform classical results.

"Considering the youth of the technology, this is very promising," said Floether.

Additional developments are needed to match best-in-class machine learning, said Laanait, including larger feature dimensionality and noise resiliency. But he said the healthcare industry is already on the cusp of quantum computing being the mainstay,and the industry needs to jump on the technology as soon as possible.

"Nobody can do quantum computing alone, but you have to start now," said Laanait.

Twitter: @JELagasseEmail the writer:Jeff.Lagasse@himssmedia.com

Read more:
Quantum computing poised to transform healthcare - Healthcare Finance News

Read More..

Quantum computing: Where we are now, and how we got there – Hindustan Times

{{^userSubscribed}}{{/userSubscribed}}{{^userSubscribed}}{{/userSubscribed}}

New Delhi: The National Quantum Mission approved by the Union cabinet last week is a venture into the unknown, and not just because quantum computing is still a fledgling field of study. The clich is also true of the very science that the quest for quantum computers is based on.

Quantum mechanics is a mysterious world where a particle can exist in two states at once, or when a cat, famously named after Erwin Schrdinger, is both alive and dead (or neither) provided you dont look at it, because when you do, it will definitely be dead.

I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics, the legendary American physicist Richard Feynman said at Cornell Universitys Messenger Lectures in 1964. The following year, he would win the Nobel Prize for Physics for his work on quantum mechanics.

From quantum mechanics emerged the quest for quantum computers a couple of decades later, seeking to harness the strange properties of nature at atomic levels. Such computers, in theory, would be several times faster than traditional computers.

In fact, it was none other than Feynman who, in 1981, proposed the idea of finding a computer simulation of physics. The real use of it would be with quantum mechanics Nature isnt classical and if you want to make a simulation of nature, youd better make it quantum mechanical, and by golly its a wonderful problem, because it doesnt look so easy, he said at a conference organised by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and IBM.

Quantum computing is one of the four domains for which thematic hubs will be set up in top academic and national research and development institutes under the National Quantum Mission approved last week with a budget of 6,000 crore. The other three domains are quantum communication, which seeks to transmit information that would be difficult to eavesdrop on; quantum sensing and metrology, or the use of quantum phenomena to make precise measurements; and quantum materials and devices, such materials being solids with exotic properties.

Quantum technology is a field where research still has miles to go, especially as far as building a "usable" quantum computer is concerned. However, some key milestones have been reached, particularly over the last couple of decades.

Classical physics cannot explain much of the behaviour of matter and energy at subatomic levels, but can still explain much of the physical world. Quantum mechanics studies matter at the atomic and subatomic levels, where the laws of classical physics cease to apply.

In Feynmans words, Things on a very small scale behave like nothing that you have any direct experience about. They do not behave like waves, they do not behave like particles, they do not behave like clouds, or billiard balls, or weights on springs, or like anything that you have ever seen.

The physicist said this in a lecture delivered at the California Institute of Technology. You can view it on the universitys website.

Quantum mechanics is all about weird concepts: wave-particle duality, a property that allows matter and energy, such as light, to behave both as a wave and as a stream of particles; superposition, when an object exists in multiple possible states at the same time; and entanglement, when two or more particles or photons can exist in a shared state, both behaving the same way, even if they are far apart. The 2022 Nobel Prize for Physics honoured Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger for their work on superposition.

While the benefits of quantum mechanics have engaged scientists for generations, these depend on the problem that one aims to address, said Apoorva Patel, convener of the Quantum Technology Initiative at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc).

Quantum physics was invented because certain physical phenomena could not be explained at all by classical theories. The practical advantage can be proven when such phenomena are at the core of the problems to be tackled, he said, citing the examples of superposition and entanglement among others.

Of course, classical theories explain many physical phenomena, and when that is the case, quantum technology will hardly offer any advantage in addressing them, Patel said.

The challenge is that quantum dynamics is highly fragile. Environmental disturbances rapidly destroy quantum signals. So, the quantum effects can be observed only in highly protected and cooperative settings. They do not survive in hostile situations. The need to construct a carefully protected setting is what makes quantum technology expensive, Patel said.

As such, there will be many situations in which classical technology will be more robust, cheaper and efficient. Quantum technology, therefore, will be useful only in special-purpose-devices, he said.

It requires in-depth knowledge of quantum physics to figure out what such devices would be. The rest is all hype, Patel said.

Special-purpose-devices can do many useful things. One obvious answer is that the first rewards will come in the development of high-precision sensors and measuring instruments, which will definitely bring many benefits to society. The real challenges are all in the design of such systems and not in their usage. That is where the investment must be made. Whether the government and industry will pay attention to this or not is a different story, he said.

High-precision sensors and measuring instruments would come under the domain of quantum sensing and metrology. Such sensors are vital to devices such as atomic clocks, platforms used in the making of quantum computers, and various areas of science that require high precision.

A quantum computer would be superior to classical ones in several aspects, key among them being processing speed and stronger encryption of information. A classical computer stores information in terms of bits, which are in the form of combinations of 0s and 1s. A quantum computer, on the other hand, would store information in quantum bits, or qubits. A qubit can be both 0 and 1 at the same time, and because such information can probabilistically exist in multiple forms simultaneously, the information stored rises exponentially with the number of qubits.

In quantum communication, the nature of cryptography would make eavesdropping impossible without being detected. A widely studied method is to transmit a quantum key via a series of photons. If anyone were to eavesdrop on the communication, some of the properties of the key would be altered just like Schrdingers cat would be dead once observed and so the sender of the information would know there has been a breach.

The challenges remain the fragility of quantum states and the design of such systems. At the heart of a quantum computer are its qubits, created as an array of atoms of a suitable element or isotope. These are levitated in free space in a vacuum environment. Storing and manipulating information in this exotic form requires sophisticated control of the underlying materials, Princeton University scientists said in a paper in Science in 2021, and called on materials scientists to take up the challenge of developing hardware for quantum computing.

While a usable quantum computer is still far away, the quest has progressed since Feynmans observations in 1981.

In 1985, Oxford researcher David Deutsch published a theoretical paper describing a universal quantum computer. What provoked greater interest, however, was an algorithm proposed in 1994 by Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Peter Shor, then working for American telecommunication giant, AT&T.

Shor proposed a method using entanglement of qubits and superposition to find the prime factors of an integer. This was potentially important because finding factors of large numbers is so difficult that many encryption systems exploit this difficulty. Shors idea led to a storm of research, but what he proposed in theory proved hard to achieve.

No other algorithms to rival the potential of Shors were found. Despite disappointment, momentum was not lost and the field branched into different directions, Nature observed in an editorial, 40 years of quantum computing, in January 2022.

During the current century, universities and companies have made further strides. According to Washington University, the record for the highest number of qubits is currently 72, on a chip developed by Google. In 2017, Microsoft released Q#, a language for quantum algorithms. And in January of 2019, IBM announced one of the first commercial quantum computers.

Also in 2019, Google announced that its collaborators at the University of California, Santa Barbara, had achieved quantum supremacy, the stage at which a quantum computer performs tasks that a classical computer cannot. The universitys researchers claimed to have developed a processor that took 200 seconds to do a calculation that would have taken a classical computer 10,000 years. The claim was, however, disputed by IBM.

Most existing quantum computers use metal-insulator-metal sandwiches that are turned into superconducting qubits, by being lowered to extremely low temperatures, a write-up on the US department of energy website notes. But, scientists routinely using quantum computers to answer scientific questions is a long way off, it added.

Follow this link:
Quantum computing: Where we are now, and how we got there - Hindustan Times

Read More..

URI looks to the future with new quantum computing initiative – Ricentral.com

KINGSTONFacing the University of Rhode Islands quadrangle, Sen. Jack Reed stood atop the steps of East Hall on Friday and addressed members of the URI campus following the schools announcement of a new quantum computing initiative designed to keep up to date with the fast-paced change in technology and cybersecurity.

The process is supported by a $1 million federal earmark from the state and funding from the URI College of Arts and Sciences and the Graduate School of Oceanography.

These funds will help the university expand its teaching bringing experts to expand the universitys quantum degree programs and help train the next generation of students and researchers, Reed said.

Last Friday was World Quantum Day, and the school celebrated its step toward preparing students for fields linked to the ever-evolving workforce of computing. The event lasted throughout the afternoon and into the early evening.

URIs initiative involves a new research partnership with the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). This is expected to garner further support toward the schools masters degree and graduate certificate programs and will give the university access to Big Blues cutting-edge quantum computing systems. It is anticipated that improved access to these resources will improve student education and faculty research.

(Quantum computing) is quickly becoming ubiquitous, URI President Marc Parlange said. And its rapidly evolving. And we have an opportunity to be at the leading edge of this growth.

Reed and Parlange began the symposium and Adele Merritt, Intelligence Community Chief Information Officer at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, closed with a keynote presentation in East Halls auditorium.

Other speakers throughout the day included Christopher Savoie, co-founder and chief executive officer of Zapata Computing, Christopher Lirakis, lead for quantum systems deployment at IBM, Charles Robinson, quantum computing public sector leader at IBM, Pedro Lopes, business developer at the computing firm QuEra, and Juan Rivera, senior engineer at Dell Computing, and Kurt Jacobs, deputy chief scientist at the U.S. Armys Research Lab.

Savoie holds a bachelors degree from URI and is on the College of Arts and Sciences Advisory Council. Merritt has her Ph.D. from URI, in mathematics.

Quantum mechanics is a science that explores how matter and light act on an atomic and subatomic scale. Its a fundamental theory designed to solve issues that too advanced for original or outdated technology.

Computers process data by manipulating digital information; units represented in zeros and ones. These info bits, known as qubits, can exist as zero and a one, simultaneously.

There are some present-day supercomputers that cant handle this kind of information in multiple states at once. Quantum computers, however, can perform these calculations.

Such technology is in its early stages.

URI will provide more outreach and summer research opportunities for high school students, in an attempt to spark interest for the next generation of quantum physicists.

This will be done through URIs faculty working with Qubit, a nonprofit group, to provide the reach-out and include scholarships for high schoolers to participate in summer workshops and research internships on the Kingston Campus.

In 2021, the university started a five-year program that graduates students with a bachelors degree in physics and a masters in quantum computing. This year, it added an online graduate certificate program.

Recognizing that quantum computing will be integrated into every major industry within the next decade, the physics department has developed one of the first standalone masters programs in quantum computing, as well as an online graduate certificate designed for current STEM professionals to pivot into a new career, Jen Riley, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences said. Theyve also created an undergraduate program with a five-year accelerated bachelors to masters degree program in quantum computing.

Researchers on campus are moving to make quantum computers scalable and more vigorous, while others are trying to familiarize themselves with the technology.

Access to the IBM software will also allow a partnership between URI and the Naval Undersea Warfare Center, which will support studies into the use of quantum systems in the development of autonomous underwater vehicles.

To expand research and its teaching capacity, the school plans to add four visiting faculty, four postdoctoral researchers, and four graduate teaching assistants in the coming years.

Scientific innovation has been essential to the success for the intelligence communitys mission, Merritt said. The rapidly evolving landscape requires us to be well informed on emerging technologies.

Read the original post:
URI looks to the future with new quantum computing initiative - Ricentral.com

Read More..