Cloud Hosting

The debate between Bitcoin (BTC 0.07%) and Ethereum (ETH -0.55%) as a better investment has been a hot topic in the cryptocurrency community for years. Both are popular and established cryptocurrencies, but there are key differences between them that make Bitcoin a better investment. The reason for this belief can be boiled down to three simple reasons.

Image source: Getty Images.

Market capitalization, or "market cap," refers to the total value of a company or asset. In the case of cryptocurrencies, it is calculated by multiplying the total number of coins in circulation by the current market price of each coin. As of April 1, 2023, Bitcoin has a market cap of over $545 billion, while Ethereum's market cap is just under $220 billion.

Essentially what this means is that Bitcoin is currently a more established asset than Ethereum and makes up a disproportionate amount of value in the entire crypto asset class. As of today, Bitcoin accounts for more than 45% of all the value in crypto.

Its higher market cap indicates that it has more adoption and more trust among investors. Additionally, it suggests that Bitcoin is less volatile than Ethereum, as it would take a larger amount of money to move its price significantly.

One of the most significant differences between Bitcoin and Ethereum is their supply. Bitcoin has a hard cap of 21 million coins, which means that there will never be more than 21 million bitcoins in circulation. Currently, there are around 19.3 million circulating, with the remaining 1.7 million yet to be mined. Even better, though, these remaining 1.7 million bitcoins will be released at a diminishing rate for the next 117 years until the last bitcoin is mined.

Currently, Bitcoin's inflation rate is a minimal 1.7%. However, due to the gradual decrease in the rate of new coins being created, it is estimated that by 2056, this number will fall below 0.1%. By the year 2100, Bitcoin's inflation rate will be somewhere around 0.000001%. No matter the asset, an inflation rate this low helps to ensure that prices are not only maintained but grow as demand competes for a more limited supply.

Ethereum, on the other hand, has no hard cap. While it does have a mechanism known as burning to remove ether from circulation, there is, technically, no overall limit on the number of ether which could enter the market. Unlike Bitcoin, this means that Ethereum is subject to unknown levels of inflation, which can decrease the value of each individual coin over time.

Furthermore, Bitcoin has a stronger track record when it comes to security and decentralization. Bitcoin's blockchain is the most secure and decentralized of any cryptocurrency, with thousands of nodes and miners around the world helping to verify transactions and maintain the network. This makes it less susceptible to hacking or manipulation than Ethereum, which has had several high-profile security incidents in the past. Additionally, Bitcoin's decentralized nature means that it is not subject to the same level of centralization or regulation as Ethereum, which has been criticized for being too closely tied to its founders and developers.

In addition, Bitcoin has a more established and secure network than Ethereum. Bitcoin's network has been operating securely for well over a decade, and its underlying proof-of-work technology has proven to be reliable and resistant to attacks. Ethereum, on the other hand, has had some security issues in the past, including a major hack in 2016 that resulted in the loss of millions of dollars worth of ether. While Ethereum's security has improved over time, it still lags behind Bitcoin in terms of reliability and security.

While Ethereum might be deserving of a spot in your portfolio, Bitcoin provides investors with a safer and more dependable option. Likely the greatest advantage Bitcoin has over Ethereum is its simplicity. Bitcoin's value proposition is clear and easy to understand: it is a highly decentralized and secure digital store of value that provides holders with reliability.

Ethereum, on the other hand, has a more complex value proposition that is tied to its smart contract functionality and decentralized applications. While this complexity can be appealing to some investors, it also makes Ethereum more difficult to understand and evaluate as an investment, as many of these use cases are in their beginning stages.

For investors looking to keep it simple and wanting to invest in cryptocurrency, look no further than the original digital asset, Bitcoin.

See more here:

What's a Better Buy: Bitcoin or Ethereum? - The Motley Fool

A venture capitalist who correctly called the 2022 crypto bottom thinks both Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) are coiling up for a breakout.

Placeholder partner Chris Burniske tells his 257,800 Twitter followers that BTC and ETHs weekly charts are making him too bullish on crypto.

BTC & ETH coiling.

Fellow crypto veteran Raoul Pal, the chief executive of Real Vision, shares Burniskes bullish sentiment regarding Ethereum.

Tasty chart of ETHeventually the 1,850 level will go and it will be fireworks.

Ethereum is worth $1,868 at time of writing. The second-ranked crypto asset by market cap is up 3.74% in the past day and more than 5.1% in the past week.

Bitcoin is trading for $28,164 at time of writing. The top-ranked crypto asset by market cap is up 0.66% in the past 24 hours and nearly 3% in the past seven days.

Burniske said last month that he remains bullish on blockchain and crypto regardless of the macroeconomic landscape.

Im as long crypto as Ive ever been blockchains are critical infrastructure that provides solutions to the problems our society faces, including AI. As a species, we eventually find our way, though the walk is full of sticks and stones. If you look up, there are blue skies.

He also predicted that Bitcoinwould exceed $30,000 and Ethereum would surpass $2,000 in April.

Generated Image: Midjourney

See the article here:

Crypto Industry Veterans Say Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) Coiling Up for Breakouts - The Daily Hodl

Paris has recently made its move to become the next big crypto hub, even after the closure of several crypto-friendly banks and the failure of the FTX. The French government has been showing support for the crypto industry and blockchain technology, with President Emmanuel Macron seeing cryptocurrency as one way to attract businesses. This could have a huge effect on the big crypto names on the market, such as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), as well as tokens that have yet to launch on an exchange and are still making a name for themselves, like Signuptoken.com.

Signuptoken.com is a new project that aims to create generational wealth through the simplest idea possible registering a single email that will help subscribers retire early. The project has set a goal of reaching one million email subscriptions before launching its token on Uniswap.

As of this writing, Signuptoken.com has accumulated 3,000 email subscribers, which is one step closer to the projects goal.

Subscribers will be updated on the projects progress through email updates. Once the one million email subscription target is reached, the team will send out a single email announcing the launch of the ERC-20 token. The project is attempting something that has not been achieved on a global scale before.

The team behind Signuptoken.com will send out a verification email to confirm all users added are genuine, ensuring the validity of the projects one million email subscription goal. The team has not doxxed their identities and will not be providing tokenomics about the crypto coin.

Bitcoin is the biggest crypto coin on the market, and many establishments have started accepting it as a payment method. In Paris, Burger King has made a bold move by introducing power bank rental machines called Instpower, which accept crypto payments, like BTC. Instpower machines are connected to Binance Pay and Alchemy Pay.

This move by Burger King in Paris is part of a larger trend of companies embracing cryptocurrency payments, demonstrating the growing acceptance and legitimacy of digital currencies. With the rise of crypto and the growing demand for alternative payment methods, it is likely that more businesses will follow suit and start accepting cryptocurrency payments in the near future.

One famous crypto analyst Justin Bennett has his financial speculation about Ethereum facing a rally en route to liquidating traders facing bearish action on ETHs platform. According to Bennett, the rally at the end of March could hint at the crypto markets short-term performance.

Usually, the crypto market is affected by stock market trends, but a lag seems to appear between the two asset classes. If the crypto market takes cues from equities, a resistance level at $1,840 for Ethereum is possible. Therefore, a short squeeze could occurwhich triggers ralliesas there is a huge amount of short liquidations over the $2,000 price level.

There could be a possibility that Ethereum would become one of the major crypto coins that Paris would accept for buying and selling goods.

As Paris embraces crypto and recognizes its benefits and potential as an alternative to traditional forms of currency, many other countries may follow suit. While crypto has risks due to economic conditions and market volatility, embracing this investment as part of the future of finance can help everyone adapt to the changing landscape of the digital economy.

Signuptoken.com might be the next big crypto coin to launch on an exchange! Learn more about this unique crypto project and sign up to reap the early benefits when the coin launches.

Website: https://www.signuptoken.com

Twitter: https://twitter.com/_SignUpToken_

Telegram: https://t.me/SignUpToken

Read the original post:

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Signuptoken.com: Top 3 Coins to Consider As ... - Analytics Insight

A hot topic in crypto circles these days is how to process more transactions on a blockchain, leading many pundits to say it cant be done in a decentralized fashion. This opinion is a popular one but also belies a superficial understanding of the problem with Ethereums scaling solutions in particulara problem that stems from the financing models driving these solutions.

For those unfamiliar with the debate, Ethereum and Bitcoin have for years struggled with congestion and high fees arising from their failure to keep up with demand on their blockchains. This has in turn created opportunities for projects offering on-top solutions as a means to handle that extra demand. The result is a plethora of so-called layer-2, or L2, sidechainsArbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon among themthat are intended to increase transaction capacity while keeping the chain orderly.

In the Bitcoin network, these efforts have largely focused around Lightning, a system of secured peer-to-peer channels that allow for quick and cheap transactions. In the case of Ethereum, developers have taken a more baroque approach that typically looks like this: A technical team claims to have a novel solution to scale Ethereum by capturing transactions on their network, and that idea is pitched to venture capitalists. But instead of integrating this software directly into the main protocol, so Ethereum as a network can scale, a new tokenan L2 tokenis issued to transact using this new software.

Does this have to happen? Well, no. Strictly speaking, there is nothing stopping Ethereum leadership from incorporating scaling solutions at the protocol level to lower its costs and make the network more efficient. But instead of working to make the scaling happen directly, the Ethereum crowd has instead relied on the L2 route. (Its worth noting that Tezos, the blockchain I cofounded, recently deployed an L2 solution without introducing a token.)

While L2 solutions on Ethereum have succeeded in offering faster and cheaper transactions, their insistence on adding their own proprietary tokens add friction. To make matters worse, the L2 projects often rush to market with underdeveloped solutions, creating a reliance upon Ethereum contracts under their control and centralized oversight to address security issues later. While this tokenized approach funds development and generates hype, it quickly leads to disillusionment as inflated token market capitalizations fail to meet expectations.

So why does Ethereum continue to embrace these half-baked L2 solutions? Look no further than Sand Hill Road.

Traditionally, venture capitalists offer financing for new businessesthe word venture connoting newer, riskier investments, unlike those perhaps preferred by other private equity firms. VCs typically look to exit their positions through IPOs or acquisitions, often on five- or seven-year time horizons.

If VCs had a chance speed up their exitsthe big moment everyone gets paidto an order of months, you can bet they would leap on it. And so enter a new model facilitated by crypto.

In Crypto VC speak, exit strategies dont come from the creation of a useful, flourishing business. Since 2018 or so, VCs have acted as providers of bridge capital to teams until a token is created and sold. Its about short-term storytelling because, ultimately, the value of the token isnt defensible. Often, its a solution in search of a problem or, in the case of scaling, a source of additional friction. The last two months have served as testament to the instability of L2 tokens for a variety of business reasons.

Last month, Coinbase announced it was launching an L2 solution based on Optimism. This was poetic: Optimism already has an unnecessary token and a staking mechanism for its distribution. Unfortunately, it lacks fraud proofs, or the basic security ingredient that makes a scaling solution more secure than a hope and a prayer. What we have here is a token in search of its own technology.

More recently, Arbitrum, an L2 on Ethereum thats raised over $100 million from VCs such as Lightspeed, issued a governance token called ARB to justify its place outside the base Ethereum protocol. As part of its first governing act, the community was asked to vote on a proposal that would send 750 million of its tokens, worth around $1 billion, to its nonprofit foundation. When rank-and-file community members balked at this plan, the Arbitrum Foundation clarified that these funds were already being allocatedand, indeed, had been spent. It was a lucky day for those folks who gave them money last year in a private transaction, and virtually nobody else who bought into the gold-plated resumes of its founding team and the characterizations of their project.

Quite the arbitrage, indeed.

Scaling solutions that create more costs and hoops to jump through for users by issuing pernicious tokens arent solutions at all. Ethereum will evolve once it weens off venture capitalists and embraces a model that seeks to disintermediate, rather than subsidize, the well-heeled financiers of Web2.

Kathleen Breitmanis a cofounder ofTezos. The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs ofFortune.

More:

Ethereum, Arbitrum, and why L2 solutions are such a mess - Fortune