Page 14«..10..13141516..2030..»

Generative Artificial Intelligence Revolution Heats Up in Asia/Pacific, with IDC expecting a 95.4% CAGR in 2027 … – EMSNow

SINGAPORE IDCs latestWorldwide AI and Generative AI Spending Guidereveals that the Asia/Pacific* region is witnessing an unprecedented surge in Generative AI (GenAI) adoption, including software, services, and hardware for AI-centric** systems with spending projected to soar to $26 billion by 2027, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 95.4 percent for the period 2022-2027. This surge underscores the regions pivotal role in driving the next wave of AI innovation and technological advancement.

GenAI is a branch of computer science involving unsupervised and semi-supervised algorithms that enable computers to create new content using previously created content, such as text, audio, video, images, and code, in response to short prompts. IDC believes GenAI will be a trigger technology to transition to a new chapter in the move toward automation for both internal and external parties across generic productivity, business functionspecific enhancements, or industry-specific tasks.

We anticipate that Asia/Pacific will experience a surge in the adoption of Generative AI, with growth rates expected to match those of North America, largely due to enterprises investing heavily in developing data and infrastructure platforms tailored for GenAI applications. We forecast that this investment in GenAI will reach its zenith within the next two years, followed by a period of stabilization. China is projected to maintain its position as the dominant market for GenAI, while Japan and India are set to become the most rapidly expanding markets in the forthcoming years,Deepika Giri, Head of Research, Big Data & AI, IDC APJ.

Unlocking the vast potential of GenAI, the Asia/Pacific region is poised for a transformative journey across various sectors. With robust digital infrastructure and growing investments in technology, Asia/Pacific emerges as a pivotal player in this dynamic landscape. Strategic investment in hardware, software, and associated services for GenAI is crucial to sustaining and propelling this progress. From software development to customer service, GenAI is revolutionizing industries, ushering in a new era of innovation in Asia/Pacific.

IT spending in GenAI technology progresses through three distinct stages. Initially, during the GenAI Foundation Build phase, attention is directed towards enhancing core infrastructure, investing in IaaS, and bolstering security software. Subsequently, in the Broad Adoption phase, the focus shifts towards the widespread adoption of open-source AI platforms offered as-a-service, playing a fundamental role in digital business control planes. Finally, the Unified AI Services phase sees a surge in spending as organizations rapidly integrate GenAI to gain a competitive edge, diverging from the typical slower growth observed in new technology markets.

GenAI isnt a fleeting trend. Its capacity to generate entirely new content, across various mediums, such as images, videos, code, and marketing materials, promises substantial efficiency gains and paves the way for innovative creative opportunities, granting a competitive advantage, saysVinayaka Venkatesh, Senior Market Analyst, IT Spending Guides, Customer Insights & Analysis, IDC Asia/Pacific. A significant portion of organizations have either already adopted Generative AI or are in the initial stages of experimenting with models,Vinayaka Venkateshends.

The financial services sector is experiencing rapid growth in Generative AI adoption in Asia. It is projected to reach $4.3 billion by 2027 with a remarkable CAGR of 96.7%. Within this industry, GenAI is being utilized internally to enhance operations efficiency, automate repetitive tasks, and optimize back-office processes such as fraud detection and the creation of intricate documents. Generative AI-powered solutions provide tailored financial services like personalized planning tools and reports, which dynamically adjust to meet customers evolving needs. Furthermore, the integration of GenAI yields substantial benefits to profitability by cutting costs, driving revenue generation, and enhancing productivity across various functions such as DevOps, marketing, and legal compliance.

The software and information services industry stands as the second-largest adopter of GenAI, embracing its versatility across sectors such as marketing, data analytics, and software development. Within marketing, GenAI can streamline content creation for websites, blogs, and social media platforms, optimizing marketing strategies and enhancing audience engagement. In data-driven fields like machine learning and analytics, GenAI proves invaluable for generating synthetic data, enriching existing datasets, and improving model performance and resilience. Additionally, in software development, these tools aid developers by automating coding tasks, generating prototypes, and accelerating the software development lifecycle, leading to heightened productivity and efficiency.

As the third-largest adopter of GenAI, governments across the Asia-Pacific region have a substantial opportunity to transform their operations and service delivery. This technology holds the potential to enhance efficiency, transparency, and citizen engagement. Governments are well-placed to spearhead efforts in advancing education and training in GenAI, thereby catalyzing the creation of new job prospects, and stimulating the growth of technology innovation hubs. These hubs will function as focal points for state-of-the-art training, bolstering skill sets, and nurturing the emergence of future AI professionals, including scientists, engineers, technicians, and specialists.

In the rapidly evolving Asia/Pacific retail market, characterized by diverse consumer preferences and advancing digital technologies, retailers are increasingly turning to GenAI to gain a competitive advantage. GenAI enables enhanced personalization, tailoring experiences to individual preferences, while also boosting efficiency by automating tasks like product design and content creation, thereby accelerating time-to-market. Furthermore, retailers leverage GenAI to create dynamic visual content and interactive experiences, fostering heightened customer engagement and loyalty.

IDCsWorldwide AI and Generative AI Spending Guidemeasures spending for technologies that analyze, organize, access, and provide advisory services based on a range of unstructured information. The Spending Guide quantifies the AI opportunity by providing data for 38 use cases across 27 industries in nine regions and 32 countries. Data is also available for the related hardware, software, and services categories. The AI and Generative AI Spending Guide is produced to provide the latest market developments through an accurate and quality forecast. During the period between updates, IDCs AI and Generative AI analyst teams conduct primary and secondary research to support this data product. Research in the period from August 2023 to February 2024 resulted in multiple additions and enhancements to the data. In this release of the AI and GenAI Spending Guide, we distilled leading forecasts such as IDCs Worldwide Black Book and IDCs Worldwide ICT Spending Guide, as well as AI and generative AI research led by IDCs AI Council of senior researchers globally.

20% of Asia/Pacific organizations are planning to build their own generative AI models. Explore IDCs latest eBook to stay equipped for the GenAI revolution. Download now:bit.ly/ genai -build-buy

**Taxonomy Note:The IDCWorldwide AI and Generative AI Spending Guideuses a precise definition of what constitutes an AI Application in which the application must have an AI component that is crucial to the application without this AI component the application will not function. This distinction enables the Spending Guide to focus on those software applications that are strongly AI-centric. In comparison, the IDCWorldwide Semiannual Artificial Intelligence Trackeruses a broad definition of AI Applications that includes applications where the AI component is non-centric, or not fundamental, to the application. This enables the inclusion of vendors that have incorporated AI capabilities into their software, but the applications are not exclusively used for AI functions. In other words, the application will function without the inclusion of the AI component.

Read more from the original source:
Generative Artificial Intelligence Revolution Heats Up in Asia/Pacific, with IDC expecting a 95.4% CAGR in 2027 ... - EMSNow

Read More..

Artificial Intelligence Amplifies State Tax Audits on High Earners – WebProNews

As fears about artificial intelligence (AI) veer from job displacement to broader societal control, state tax departments harness this potent technology to boost audits on high earners significantly. Robert Frank of CNBC highlights how already high-taxed Democrate-controlled states like New York and California are increasingly deploying AI to scrutinize the tax declarations of the wealthy, intensifying efforts to reclaim unreported income.

In the past year, high-tax states have issued a surge in audit letters, with figures marking a 56% increase from the previous year. The targets? Affluent individuals who have relocated across state lines during the pandemic and remote workers whose physical locations do not align with their companys base.

AIs role in these audits is groundbreaking and unnerving for those it targets. By analyzing vast datasets, AI systems identify patterns and anomalies in tax returns more efficiently than human auditors ever could. This capability is instrumental in tracking high earners who might have underreported their incomes or falsely claimed to have moved permanently to tax-haven states.

Accountants and tax lawyers confirm that the rate of audits has escalated dramatically over the last six months. Tax authorities are challenging the permanence of moves made during the COVID-19 pandemic, insisting that many owe state taxes irrespective of their new residences. Furthermore, states are scrutinizing remote workers who, despite working entirely out-of-state, are employed by companies based in places like New York.

The fiscal implications for states are significant. With California facing a $38 billion deficit and New York bracing for a $10 billion shortfall next year, the financial incentive to pursue wealthy taxpayers is compelling. The infusion of $80 billion into the IRS, earmarked for enforcement, means that high earners are likely to face audits from both state and federal levels.

Questions linger about the efficacy and fairness of AI-driven audits. Critics ask whether these automated systems might overreach or misinterpret complex tax data, potentially leading to wrongful accusations. Yet, proponents argue that AI could revolutionize tax enforcement by uncovering hidden patterns of evasion that would be impossible for human auditors to detect.

As states and the IRS increasingly rely on artificial intelligence to bolster their audits, the landscape of tax enforcement is undergoing a profound transformation. This shift promises greater efficiency but raises important questions about privacy, fairness, and the transparency of AI algorithms in legal and financial contexts. Whether this trend will lead to a more equitable tax system or merely shift the burden more heavily onto certain groups remains to be seen.

Read more here:
Artificial Intelligence Amplifies State Tax Audits on High Earners - WebProNews

Read More..

Chamath Palihapitiya Says Voice Will Be the "Front Door" for the Next Phase of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Here Are … – The Motley Fool

Among the most under-the-radar facets of artificial intelligence (AI) are its applications in voice-controlled devices.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has taken the world by storm during the past year and a half. Breakthroughs in AI are leading to sweeping changes in accelerated computing, healthcare, e-commerce, and more. It seems like the possibilities are endless, and the technology is destined to disrupt more and more areas of everyday life.

One application in the AI realm that is often overlooked is voice-recognition technology. But believe it or not, you interact with this feature of AI quite often.

Billionaire venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya recently took to X (the social media platform formerly known as Twitter) to predict that applications in voice will be the "front door" to the next frontier of the AI revolution.

Let's break down the market for AI-powered voice software, and explore some investment opportunities in the space.

A number of companies compete in the voice-recognition software market. Apple entered the niche through its acquisitions of Siri and Shazam. The Siri virtual assistant has become integrated throughout Apple's ecosystem and is a staple in the company's devices. Amazon has leveraged the technology in its Echo devices, and Alphabet has done the same in its Google Home smart home appliances.

On top of that, Microsoft (MSFT -0.66%) and Nvidia also entered the voice-recognition software market through a series of savvy investments.

According to Statista, the total addressable market for voice-recognition tools is forecast to reach nearly $50 billion by 2029. Considering the opportunities in this pocket of the AI landscape, it's not surprising that so many big tech enterprises are competing in it.

Image Source: Getty Images.

Two of the more prominent names in the voice-recognition market right now are SoundHound AI (SOUN -2.46%) and Microsoft.

Earlier this year, investors learned that Nvidia has a small ownership stake in SoundHound AI. After that information became public, the shares of SoundHound AI soared by as much as 320%. Although some of that momentum has waned, the company remains a top name in AI.

One of the biggest use cases for SoundHound AI's tech is voice-controlled systems in cars. With clients including Stellantis, Honda, and Hyundai, it's clear that the company has been able to attract some brand recognition.

SoundHound AI recently said that it will be offering Nvidia's DRIVE software to its automaker customers. Some applications for this technology include helping drivers answer questions related to vehicle maintenance, safety features, and car settings.

Shortly after SoundHound AI released details about its partnership with Nvidia, ChatGPT developer OpenAI made an announcement of its own. Namely, it revealed its latest product, Voice Engine, a tool that aims to help in areas such as video translation as well as in clinical settings related to speech therapy.

I agree with Palihapitiya's assertion that voice will play a big role in the further development of artificial intelligence services. In a way, it makes total sense. The sophistication of AI use cases is evolving in real time. Leveraging voice points to a future in which AI becomes even more ingrained in many aspects of daily life.

For this reason, some investors may be eager to get in on the action. As with any investment, however, there are risks.

Sure, SoundHound AI's partnership with Nvidia is exciting on the surface. But with only $46 million in revenue last year, coupled with mounting operating losses, SoundHound AI may not be the most prudent opportunity in voice-recognition technology.

Furthermore, when you layer in that Nvidia DRIVE is also being used by many other customers -- including SoundHound AI's competitor Cerence -- the potential for the partnership between the two appears less lucrative because it's not exclusive.

On the other hand, investing in Microsoft may be a subtle way to benefit from breakthroughs in AI-powered speech technology. The company is a major investor in OpenAI. Moreover, throughout 2023, Microsoft aggressively implemented ChatGPT across its Windows operating system -- a move that has unlocked a new phase of growth.

Although Voice Engine is not yet commercially available, I suspect that OpenAI will release it once it figures out how to best mitigate the risks that come with voice-mimicking technology.

Nevertheless, given Microsoft's close ties to OpenAI, I see it as a major beneficiary of voice-recognition software in the long run, and a much more proven, established opportunity in the AI narrative overall compared to other smaller competitors.

Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Cerence and Stellantis and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read this article:
Chamath Palihapitiya Says Voice Will Be the "Front Door" for the Next Phase of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Here Are ... - The Motley Fool

Read More..

Artificial intelligence in liver cancer new tools for research and patient management – Nature.com

Sung, H. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209249 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Rumgay, H. et al. Global, regional and national burden of primary liver cancer by subtype. Eur. J. Cancer 161, 108118 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 69, 182236 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Ducreux, M. et al. The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 24th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2022. ESMO Open. 8, 101567 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Echle, A. et al. Deep learning in cancer pathology: a new generation of clinical biomarkers. Br. J. Cancer 124, 686696 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Friemel, J. et al. Intratumor heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 19511961 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Calderaro, J. et al. Histological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma are related to gene mutations and molecular tumour classification. J. Hepatol. 67, 727738 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Solinas, A. & Calvisi, D. F. Lessons from rare tumors: hepatic lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas. World J. Gastroenterol. 21, 34723479 (2015).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Salomao, M., Yu, W. M., Brown, R. S. Jr, Emond, J. C. & Lefkowitch, J. H. Steatohepatitic hepatocellular carcinoma (SH-HCC): a distinctive histological variant of HCC in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis with associated NAFLD/NASH. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 34, 16301636 (2010).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Limousin, W. et al. Molecular-based targeted therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and hepato-cholangiocarcinoma refractory to atezolizumab/bevacizumab. J. Hepatol. 79, 14501458 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Prueksapanich, P. et al. Liver fluke-associated biliary tract cancer. Gut Liver 12, 236245 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL-ILCA clinical practice guidelines on the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepatol. 79, 181208 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Vithayathil, M., Bridegwater, J. & Khan, S. A. Medical therapies for intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepatol. 75, 981983 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Nault, J.-C. & Villanueva, A. Biomarkers for hepatobiliary cancers. Hepatology 73, 115127 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Brunt, E. et al. cHCC-CCA: consensus terminology for primary liver carcinomas with both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentation. Hepatology 68, 113126 (2018).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Rinella, M. E. et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Ann. Hepatol. 29, 101133 (2024).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Wong, V. W.-S., Ekstedt, M., Wong, G. L.-H. & Hagstrm, H. Changing epidemiology, global trends and implications for outcomes of NAFLD. J. Hepatol. 79, 842852 (2023).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Clements, O., Eliahoo, J., Kim, J. U., Taylor-Robinson, S. D. & Khan, S. A. Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hepatol. 72, 95103 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Jing, W. et al. Diabetes mellitus and increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 21, 2431 (2012).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Litjens, G. et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42, 6088 (2017).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Wagner, S. J. et al. Transformer-based biomarker prediction from colorectal cancer histology: a large-scale multicentric study. Cancer Cell 41, 16501661.e4 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Khader, F. et al. Multimodal deep learning for integrating chest radiographs and clinical parameters: a case for transformers. Radiology 309, e230806 (2023).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Reis-Filho, J. S. & Kather, J. N. Overcoming the challenges to implementation of artificial intelligence in pathology. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 115, 608612 (2023).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Shmatko, A., Ghaffari Laleh, N., Gerstung, M. & Kather, J. N. Artificial intelligence in histopathology: enhancing cancer research and clinical oncology. Nat. Cancer 3, 10261038 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Cheng, N. et al. Deep learning-based classification of hepatocellular nodular lesions on whole-slide histopathologic images. Gastroenterology 162, 19481961.e7 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kiani, A. et al. Impact of a deep learning assistant on the histopathologic classification of liver cancer. NPJ Digit. Med. 3, 23 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Calderaro, J. et al. Deep learning-based phenotyping reclassifies combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. Nat. Commun. 14, 8290 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Chung, T. & Park, Y. N. Up-to-date pathologic classification and molecular characteristics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Front. Med. 9, 857140 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Albrecht, T. et al. Deep learning-enabled diagnosis of liver adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 165, 12621275 (2023).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Lu, M. Y. et al. AI-based pathology predicts origins for cancers of unknown primary. Nature 594, 106110 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Saillard, C. et al. Predicting survival after hepatocellular carcinoma resection using deep-learning on histological slides. Hepatology 72, 20002013 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Shi, J.-Y. et al. Exploring prognostic indicators in the pathological images of hepatocellular carcinoma based on deep learning. Gut 70, 951961 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Xie, J. et al. Survival prediction on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with histomorphological analysis on the whole slide images. Comput. Biol. Med. 146, 105520 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sjblom, N. et al. Automated image analysis of keratin 7 staining can predict disease outcome in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatol. Res. 53, 322333 (2023).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Cifci, D., Foersch, S. & Kather, J. N. Artificial intelligence to identify genetic alterations in conventional histopathology. J. Pathol. 257, 430444 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Campanella, G. et al. H&E-based computational biomarker enables universal EGFR screening for lung adenocarcinoma. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.10573 (2022).

Echle, A. et al. Artificial intelligence for detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer a multicentric analysis of a pre-screening tool for clinical application. ESMO Open. 7, 100400 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Echle, A. et al. Deep learning for the detection of microsatellite instability from histology images in colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review. ImmunoInformatics 34, 100008 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Farahmand, S. et al. Deep learning trained on hematoxylin and eosin tumor region of interest predicts HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment response in HER2+ breast cancer. Mod. Pathol. 35, 4451 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fu, Y. et al. Pan-cancer computational histopathology reveals mutations, tumor composition and prognosis. Nat. Cancer 1, 800810 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kather, J. N. et al. Pan-cancer image-based detection of clinically actionable genetic alterations. Nat. Cancer 1, 789799 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhang, H. et al. Predicting tumor mutational burden from liver cancer pathological images using convolutional neural network. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) (eds Yoo, I., Bi, J. & Hu, X) 920925 (IEEE, 2019).

Zeng, Q. et al. Artificial intelligence predicts immune and inflammatory gene signatures directly from hepatocellular carcinoma histology. J. Hepatol. 1, 116127 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Macias, R. I. R. et al. Clinical relevance of biomarkers in cholangiocarcinoma: critical revision and future directions. Gut 71, 16691683 (2022).

CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zeng, Q. et al. Artificial intelligence-based pathology as a biomarker of sensitivity to atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 24, 14111422 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Oh, D.-Y. et al. Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer. NEJM Evid. https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2200015 (2022).

Nam, D., Chapiro, J., Paradis, V., Seraphin, T. P. & Kather, J. N. Artificial intelligence in liver diseases: improving diagnostics, prognostics and response prediction. JHEP Rep. 4, 100443 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Narita, K. et al. Iodine maps derived from sparse-view kV-switching dual-energy CT equipped with a deep learning reconstruction for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 13, 3603 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lee, H. J., Kim, J. S., Lee, J. K., Lee, H. A. & Pak, S. Ultra-low-dose hepatic multiphase CT using deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithm focused on arterial phase in chronic liver disease: a non-inferiority study. Eur. J. Radiol. 159, 110659 (2023).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Liu, F. et al. Deep learning radiomics based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound might optimize curative treatments for very-early or early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Liver Cancer 9, 397413 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Huang, Z. et al. Deep learning-based radiomics based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound predicts early recurrence and survival outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 14, 23802392 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Mller-Franzes, G. et al. Using machine learning to reduce the need for contrast agents in breast MRI through synthetic images. Radiology 307, e222211 (2023).

Originally posted here:
Artificial intelligence in liver cancer new tools for research and patient management - Nature.com

Read More..

AI-Powered Apps Streamline Team Collaboration – PYMNTS.com

Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are already conversing with you and are now here to enhance teamwork.

Snap, a new app by Swit Technologies, is among a wave of collaboration tools that use generative AI to streamline project management, communication and workflows. Experts say such software can include intelligent meeting schedulers, real-time document collaboration, virtual assistants, and adaptive workflow management systems.

AI can be great for speeding up or automating certain tasks and elements of collaboration that can be tedious or prone to error,Darrin Murriner, the CEO ofCloverleaf.me, told PYMNTS. In the collaboration process, this could include collaborating on documents, writing content, communicating and compiling information.

APYMNTS report from last year suggests that GenAI technologies like OpenAIs ChatGPT could significantly enhance productivity. While they may also disrupt employment landscapes, the chief operations officer at Axios HQ, Jordan Zaslav, expressed optimism about AIs role in fostering collaboration. He predicted the designation AI-powered tools might soon become as commonplace as cloud-based technologies are today, inspiring a new era of productivity.

Snap is a project management system, task manager, and message board rolled into one designed to provide a range of features that extend beyond simple conversation facilitation. The chatbot aims to support collaborative project work by offering functionalities such as converting conversations into tasks, generating checklists, offering contextual responses and summarizing tasks.

Snap is not alone in the realm of AI-powered collaboration tools. Zoom, the well-known video conferencing platform, has recently introducedZoom Workplace, an AI-driven solution aimed at boosting productivity and fostering teamwork within its user-friendly interface. The AI Companion updates feature a range of new tools, most notably Ask AI Companion, a digital assistant that helps users streamline their workday within Zoom Workplace. Other improvements include an AI Companion for Zoom Phone and enhanced capabilities for Team Chat and Whiteboard.

AI note-taking applications such as Otter.ai and Fireflies not only transcribe meeting discussions in real time but also automatically distribute these notes to all participants after the meeting,Kevin LouxofCharlotte Works told PYMNTS. This feature ensures that everyone involved has access to the same information, fostering better communication and collaboration among team members.

AI tools are definitely a booster for collaboration especially with global and remote teams,Harpaul Sambhi, CEO of the AI company Magical, told PYMNTS. By incorporating AI tools into their workflow, teams can increase productivity, improve efficiency and streamline communication. By curating a shared library of top productivity tricks from frequently used messages to common workflow automation teams work more efficiently together.

Magical uses AI to automate repetitive tasks such as messaging, Sambhi said.

With Magical, we can start to understand the common workflows of all of our users and suggest recommendations for automating those tasks, he explained. AI will help us understand those patterns. Similarly, if you think of a large organization with many employees and lots of coordination/collaboration, we can start to narrow in on the repetitive tasks of, lets say, a team or department, and start to automate the tasks between employees.

As AI evolves and as people get more comfortable with its application, the uses of AI in collaboration will evolve as well, Murriner predicted.

There will likely be a move from more routine tasks to higher-order problem-solving and solutions, as well as improving our ability to build relationships and make connections, he added. These can be useful in a multitude of ways, including improving sales performance, recommending new opportunities for collaboration, or identifying who to connect with to improve outcomes.

See the original post here:
AI-Powered Apps Streamline Team Collaboration - PYMNTS.com

Read More..

Missed Out on Nvidia Stock? 1 Spectacular Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy Instead – The Motley Fool

Some investors might be upset about missing out on Nvidia's remarkable gains.

Fool.com contributor Parkev Tatevosian has identified one artificial intelligence (AI) stock that could benefit from the growing industry.

*Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of April 13, 2024. The video was published on April 15, 2024.

Parkev Tatevosian, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Parkev Tatevosian is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe throughhis link, he will earn some extra money that supports his channel. His opinions remain his own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.

Continued here:
Missed Out on Nvidia Stock? 1 Spectacular Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy Instead - The Motley Fool

Read More..

Palantir Stock vs. Microsoft Stock: Which Is the Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy? – The Motley Fool

Palantir might be a smaller company, but that doesn't automatically make Microsoft the better investment.

Fool.com contributor Parkev Tatevosian compares Palantir Technologies (PLTR -2.60%) to Microsoft (MSFT -0.66%) to determine the better stock to buy.

*Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of April 14, 2024. The video was published on April 16, 2024.

Parkev Tatevosian, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Parkev Tatevosian is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through his link, he will earn some extra money that supports his channel. His opinions remain his own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.

Read more from the original source:
Palantir Stock vs. Microsoft Stock: Which Is the Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock to Buy? - The Motley Fool

Read More..

These 3 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Cryptos Are Rocketing Higher Today – Yahoo Finance

It's been a wild day for cryptocurrency investors, with a number of top tokens seeing outsize volatility in today's session. For AI cryptos, these moves have been even more exaggerated.

As of 2:15 p.m. ET on Monday, The Graph (CRYPTO: GRT), Fetch.ai (CRYPTO: FET), and SingularityNET (CRYPTO:AGIX) are still up meaningfully, surging 5.6%, 2%, and 1.8%, respectively, over the past 24 hours. However, many of these tokens have continued to decline in afternoon trading alongside other risk assets, as Middle East tensions rise.

For AI cryptos, geopolitical concerns shouldn't matter to the same degree as with other assets that are more sensitive to capital flows. That said, capital flows do matter regardless of which niche a given project is pursuing, and selling pressure remains strong today.

Fetch.ai and SingularityNET are two projects uniquely focused on AI that have a shared catalyst that investors are clearly pricing in. Fetch.ai is collaborating with SingularityNET and Ocean Protocol to create what they're calling the "Superintelligence Alliance."

As part of this alliance, some talks around a potential token merger have taken place, with investors now pricing these tokens in high correlation to each other.

That certainly makes sense, given the AI focus of both projects, and their collaborative ties to work together on solving much bigger problems than they likely could on their own. One thing that certainly stands out to me about crypto assets is the relative lack of willingness for projects to merge. If these projects do tie the knot at some point, it will be interesting to see how the market values a token combination.

The demand for blockchain-based AI solutions appears to be strong, and a combination of these two relatively small-cap projects could improve their chances of success in creating meaningful utility for end users.

The Graph's core model as an oracle network, allowing off-blockchain data to be ported on-chain, has seen impressive demand build over time. A number of recent collaborations and partnerships have driven an impressive amount of momentum in this token over the past week. The fact that this momentum has continued is a very positive development for long-term investors, and suggests this AI-related play could have more room to run.

Today's price action certainly implies a dip could be on the horizon, or at least a mellowing out of some rather strong momentum in these tokens in recent days. No rally lasts forever, and a breather can turn out to be a good thing. This year, these three AI-related cryptos have been among the best performers, and I wouldn't be surprised to see that narrative carried through to the end of the year.

Story continues

For growth investors seeking some crypto exposure, (and in particular, projects with AI-related headwinds), these are three tokens that I think are worth adding to the watch list to potentially buy on dips. Each project has unique catalysts that could drive value for investors and users over time. That's what this space is supposed to be about, which is what makes assessing these cryptos so compelling.

Before you buy stock in Fetch, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the10 best stocks for investors to buy now and Fetch wasnt one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service hasmore than tripledthe return of S&P 500 since 2002*.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of April 15, 2024

Chris MacDonald has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Fetch and The Graph. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

These 3 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Cryptos Are Rocketing Higher Today was originally published by The Motley Fool

Read this article:
These 3 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Cryptos Are Rocketing Higher Today - Yahoo Finance

Read More..

Machine Learning Uncovers New Ways to Kill Bacteria With Non-Antibiotic Drugs – ScienceAlert

Human history was forever changed with the discovery of antibiotics in 1928. Infectious diseases such as pneumonia, tuberculosis and sepsis were widespread and lethal until penicillin made them treatable.

Surgical procedures that once came with a high risk of infection became safer and more routine. Antibiotics marked a triumphant moment in science that transformed medical practice and saved countless lives.

But antibiotics have an inherent caveat: When overused, bacteria can evolve resistance to these drugs. The World Health Organization estimated that these superbugs caused 1.27 million deaths around the world in 2019 and will likely become an increasing threat to global public health in the coming years.

New discoveries are helping scientists face this challenge in innovative ways. Studies have found that nearly a quarter of drugs that aren't normally prescribed as antibiotics, such as medications used to treat cancer, diabetes and depression, can kill bacteria at doses typically prescribed for people.

Understanding the mechanisms underlying how certain drugs are toxic to bacteria may have far-reaching implications for medicine. If nonantibiotic drugs target bacteria in different ways from standard antibiotics, they could serve as leads in developing new antibiotics.

But if nonantibiotics kill bacteria in similar ways to known antibiotics, their prolonged use, such as in the treatment of chronic disease, might inadvertently promote antibiotic resistance.

In our recently published research, my colleagues and I developed a new machine learning method that not only identified how nonantibiotics kill bacteria but can also help find new bacterial targets for antibiotics.

Numerous scientists and physicians around the world are tackling the problem of drug resistance, including me and my colleagues in the Mitchell Lab at UMass Chan Medical School. We use the genetics of bacteria to study which mutations make bacteria more resistant or more sensitive to drugs.

When my team and I learned about the widespread antibacterial activity of nonantibiotics, we were consumed by the challenge it posed: figuring out how these drugs kill bacteria.

To answer this question, I used a genetic screening technique my colleagues recently developed to study how anticancer drugs target bacteria. This method identifies which specific genes and cellular processes change when bacteria mutate. Monitoring how these changes influence the survival of bacteria allows researchers to infer the mechanisms these drugs use to kill bacteria.

I collected and analyzed almost 2 million instances of toxicity between 200 drugs and thousands of mutant bacteria. Using a machine learning algorithm I developed to deduce similarities between different drugs, I grouped the drugs together in a network based on how they affected the mutant bacteria.

My maps clearly showed that known antibiotics were tightly grouped together by their known classes of killing mechanisms. For example, all antibiotics that target the cell wall the thick protective layer surrounding bacterial cells were grouped together and well separated from antibiotics that interfere with bacteria's DNA replication.

Intriguingly, when I added nonantibiotic drugs to my analysis, they formed separate hubs from antibiotics. This indicates that nonantibiotic and antibiotic drugs have different ways of killing bacterial cells. While these groupings don't reveal how each drug specifically kills antibiotics, they show that those clustered together likely work in similar ways.

The last piece of the puzzle whether we could find new drug targets in bacteria to kill them came from the research of my colleague Carmen Li.

She grew hundreds of generations of bacteria that were exposed to different nonantibiotic drugs normally prescribed to treat anxiety, parasite infections and cancer.

Sequencing the genomes of bacteria that evolved and adapted to the presence of these drugs allowed us to pinpoint the specific bacterial protein that triclabendazole a drug used to treat parasite infections targets to kill the bacteria. Importantly, current antibiotics don't typically target this protein.

Additionally, we found that two other nonantibiotics that used a similar mechanism as triclabendazole also target the same protein. This demonstrated the power of my drug similarity maps to identify drugs with similar killing mechanisms, even when that mechanism was yet unknown.

Our findings open multiple opportunities for researchers to study how nonantibiotic drugs work differently from standard antibiotics. Our method of mapping and testing drugs also has the potential to address a critical bottleneck in developing antibiotics.

Searching for new antibiotics typically involves sinking considerable resources into screening thousands of chemicals that kill bacteria and figuring out how they work. Most of these chemicals are found to work similarly to existing antibiotics and are discarded.

Our work shows that combining genetic screening with machine learning can help uncover the chemical needle in the haystack that can kill bacteria in ways researchers haven't used before.

There are different ways to kill bacteria we haven't exploited yet, and there are still roads we can take to fight the threat of bacterial infections and antibiotic resistance.

Mariana Noto Guillen, Ph.D. Candidate in Systems Biology, UMass Chan Medical School

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

View original post here:
Machine Learning Uncovers New Ways to Kill Bacteria With Non-Antibiotic Drugs - ScienceAlert

Read More..

Machine learning reveals the control mechanics of an insect wing hinge – Nature.com

Grimaldi, D. & Engel, M. S. Evolution of the Insects (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

Deora, T., Gundiah, N. & Sane, S. P. Mechanics of the thorax in flies. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 13821395 (2017).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Gu, J. et al. Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognit. 77, 354377 (2018).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Kramer, M. A. Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks. AlChE J. 37, 233243 (1991).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Pringle, J. W. S. The excitation and contraction of the flight muscles of insects. J. Physiol. 108, 226232 (1949).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Josephson, R. K., Malamud, J. G. & Stokes, D. R. Asynchronous muscle: a primer. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 27132722 (2000).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gau, J. et al. Bridging two insect flight modes in evolution, physiology and robophysics. Nature 622, 767774 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Boettiger, E. G. & Furshpan, E. The mechanics of flight movements in diptera. Biol. Bull. 102, 200211 (1952).

Article Google Scholar

Pringle, J. W. S. Insect Flight (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1957).

Miyan, J. A. & Ewing, A. W. How Diptera move their wings: a re-examination of the wing base articulation and muscle systems concerned with flight. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 311, 271302 (1985).

ADS Google Scholar

Wisser, A. Wing beat of Calliphora erythrocephala: turning axis and gearbox of the wing base (Insecta, Diptera). Zoomorph. 107, 359369 (1988).

Article Google Scholar

Ennos, R. A. A comparative study of the flight mechanism of diptera. J. Exp. Biol. 127, 355372 (1987).

Article Google Scholar

Dickinson, M. H. & Tu, M. S. The function of dipteran flight muscle. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 116, 223238 (1997).

Article Google Scholar

Nalbach, G. The gear change mechanism of the blowfly (Calliphora erythrocephala) in tethered flight. J. Comp. Physiol. A 165, 321331 (1989).

Article Google Scholar

Walker, S. M., Thomas, A. L. R. & Taylor, G. K. Operation of the alula as an indicator of gear change in hoverflies. J. R. Soc. Inter. 9, 11941207 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Walker, S. M. et al. In vivo time-resolved microtomography reveals the mechanics of the blowfly flight motor. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001823 (2014).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wisser, A. & Nachtigall, W. Functional-morphological investigations on the flight muscles and their insertion points in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala (Insecta, Diptera). Zoomorph. 104, 188195 (1984).

Article Google Scholar

Heide, G. Funktion der nicht-fibrillaren Flugmuskeln von Calliphora. I. Lage Insertionsstellen und Innervierungsmuster der Muskeln. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. allg. Zool. Physiol. Tiere 76, 8798 (1971).

Google Scholar

Fabian, B., Schneeberg, K. & Beutel, R. G. Comparative thoracic anatomy of the wild type and wingless (wg1cn1) mutant of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera). Arth. Struct. Dev. 45, 611636 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Tu, M. & Dickinson, M. Modulation of negative work output from a steering muscle of the blowfly Calliphora vicina. J. Exp. Biol. 192, 207224 (1994).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tu, M. S. & Dickinson, M. H. The control of wing kinematics by two steering muscles of the blowfly (Calliphora vicina). J. Comp. Physiol. A 178, 813830 (1996).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Muijres, F. T., Iwasaki, N. A., Elzinga, M. J., Melis, J. M. & Dickinson, M. H. Flies compensate for unilateral wing damage through modular adjustments of wing and body kinematics. Interface Focus 7, 20160103 (2017).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

OSullivan, A. et al. Multifunctional wing motor control of song and flight. Curr. Biol. 28, 27052717.e4 (2018).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Azevedo, A. et al. Tools for comprehensive reconstruction and analysis of Drosophila motor circuits. Preprint at BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.15.520299 (2022).

Donovan, E. R. et al. Muscle activation patterns and motoranatomy of Annas hummingbirds Calypte anna and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 86, 2746 (2013).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Bashivan, P., Kar, K. & DiCarlo, J. J. Neural population control via deep image synthesis. Science 364, eaav9436 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lindsay, T., Sustar, A. & Dickinson, M. The function and organization of the motor system controlling flight maneuvers in flies. Curr. Biol. 27, 345358 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Reiser, M. B. & Dickinson, M. H. A modular display system for insect behavioral neuroscience. J. Neurosci. Meth. 167, 127139 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Albawi, S., Mohammed, T. A. & Al-Zawi, S. Understanding of a convolutional neural network. In 2017 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET) 16 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2017.8308186 (2017).

Kennedy, J. & Eberhart, R. Particle swarm optimization. In Proc. ICNN95International Conference on Neural Networks Vol. 4, 19421948 (1995).

Dana, H. et al. High-performance calcium sensors for imaging activity in neuronal populations and microcompartments. Nat. Methods 16, 649657 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Muijres, F. T., Elzinga, M. J., Melis, J. M. & Dickinson, M. H. Flies evade looming targets by executing rapid visually directed banked turns. Science 344, 172177 (2014).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gordon, S. & Dickinson, M. H. Role of calcium in the regulation of mechanical power in insect flight. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 43114315 (2006).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Nachtigall, W. & Wilson, D. M. Neuro-muscular control of dipteran flight. J. Exp. Biol. 47, 7797 (1967).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Heide, G. & Gtz, K. G. Optomotor control of course and altitude in Drosophila melanogaster is correlated with distinct activities of at least three pairs of flight steering muscles. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 17111726 (1996).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Balint, C. N. & Dickinson, M. H. The correlation between wing kinematics and steering muscle activity in the blowfly Calliphora vicina. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 42134226 (2001).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Elzinga, M. J., Dickson, W. B. & Dickinson, M. H. The influence of sensory delay on the yaw dynamics of a flapping insect. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 16851696 (2012).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O. & Sane, S. P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284, 19541960 (1999).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lehmann, F. O. & Dickinson, M. H. The changes in power requirements and muscle efficiency during elevated force production in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 11331143 (1997).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lucia, S., Ttulea-Codrean, A., Schoppmeyer, C. & Engell, S. Rapid development of modular and sustainable nonlinear model predictive control solutions. Control Eng. Pract. 60, 5162 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Cheng, B., Fry, S. N., Huang, Q. & Deng, X. Aerodynamic damping during rapid flight maneuvers in the fruit fly Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 602612 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Collett, T. S. & Land, M. F. Visual control of flight behaviour in the hoverfly, Syritta pipiens L. J. Comp. Physiol. 99, 166 (1975).

Article Google Scholar

Muijres, F. T., Elzinga, M. J., Iwasaki, N. A. & Dickinson, M. H. Body saccades of Drosophila consist of stereotyped banked turns. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 864875 (2015).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Syme, D. A. & Josephson, R. K. How to build fast muscles: synchronous and asynchronous designs. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 762770 (2002).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Snodgrass, R. E. Principles of Insect Morphology (Cornell Univ. Press, 2018).

Williams, C. M. & Williams, M. V. The flight muscles of Drosophila repleta. J. Morphol. 72, 589599 (1943).

Article Google Scholar

Wootton, R. The geometry and mechanics of insect wing deformations in flight: a modelling approach. Insects 11, 446 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lerch, S. et al. Resilin matrix distribution, variability and function in Drosophila. BMC Biol. 18, 195 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Weis-Fogh, T. A rubber-like protein in insect cuticle. J. Exp. Biol. 37, 889907 (1960).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Weis-Fogh, T. Energetics of hovering flight in hummingbirds and in Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol. 56, 79104 (1972).

Article Google Scholar

Ellington, C. P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. VI. Lift and power requirements. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 305, 145181 (1984).

ADS Google Scholar

Alexander, R. M. & Bennet-Clark, H. C. Storage of elastic strain energy in muscle and other tissues. Nature 265, 114117 (1977).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Mronz, M. & Lehmann, F.-O. The free-flight response of Drosophila to motion of the visual environment. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 20262045 (2008).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Read more:
Machine learning reveals the control mechanics of an insect wing hinge - Nature.com

Read More..