Page 2,410«..1020..2,4092,4102,4112,412..2,4202,430..»

Ann Coulter – Wikipedia

Ann Hart Coulter (; born December 8, 1961)[2] is an American conservative media pundit, author, syndicated columnist, and lawyer.

She became known as a media pundit in the late 1990s, appearing in print and on cable news as an outspoken critic of the Clinton administration. Her first book concerned the impeachment of Bill Clinton and sprang from her experience writing legal briefs for Paula Jones's attorneys, as well as columns she wrote about the cases.[3]

Coulter's syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate appears in newspapers and is featured on conservative websites. Coulter has also written 13 books.[4]

Ann Hart Coulter was born on December 8, 1961, in New York City, to John Vincent Coulter (19262008), an FBI agent from a working class Catholic Irish American and German American family[5] in Albany, New York, and Nell Husbands Coulter (ne Martin; 19282009), who was born in Paducah, Kentucky.

Coulter's mother's ancestry has been traced back on both sides of her family to a group of Puritan settlers in Plymouth Colony, British America arriving on the Griffin with Thomas Hooker in 1633,[6] and her father's family were Catholic Irish and German immigrants who arrived in America in the 19th century. Her father's Irish ancestors emigrated during the famine[5]and became ship laborers, tilemakers, brickmakers, carpenters and flagmen. Coulter's father attended college on the GI Bill, and would later idolize Joseph McCarthy.[7]

She has two older brothers: James, an accountant,[8] and John, an attorney.[9] Her family later moved to New Canaan, Connecticut, where Coulter and her two older brothers, James and John, were raised.[10] Coulter graduated from New Canaan High School in 1980.[11]

While attending Cornell University, Coulter helped found The Cornell Review,[12] and was a member of the Delta Gamma national sorority.[13] She graduated cum laude from Cornell in 1984 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in history and received her Juris Doctor from the University of Michigan Law School in 1988, where she was an editor of the Michigan Law Review.[14] At Michigan, Coulter was president of the local chapter of the Federalist Society and was trained at the National Journalism Center.[15]

Coulter's age was disputed in 2002. While she argued that she was not yet 40, The Washington Post columnist Lloyd Grove cited a birthdate of December 8, 1961, which Coulter provided when registering to vote in New Canaan, Connecticut, prior to the 1980 Presidential election, for which she had to be 18 years old to register. A driver's license issued several years later purportedly listed her birthdate as December 8, 1963. Coulter will not confirm either date, citing privacy concerns.[16]

After law school, Coulter served as a law clerk, in Kansas City, for Judge Pasco BowmanII of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.[17] After a short time working in New York City in private practice, where she specialized in corporate law, Coulter left to work for the United States Senate Judiciary Committee after the Republican Party took control of Congress in 1994. She handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan and helped craft legislation designed to expedite the deportation of aliens convicted of felonies.[18] She later became a litigator with the Center for Individual Rights.[19]

Coulter has written 12 books, and also publishes a syndicated newspaper column. She is particularly known for her polemical style,[20] and describes herself as someone who likes to "stir up the pot. I don't pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do".[21]She idolized Clare Boothe Luce for her satirical style.[22] She also makes numerous public appearances, speaking on television and radio talk shows, as well as on college campuses, receiving both praise and protest. Coulter typically spends 612 weeks of the year on speaking engagement tours, and more when she has a book coming out.[23]In 2010, she made an estimated $500,000 on the speaking circuit, giving speeches on topics of modern conservatism, gay marriage, and what she describes as the hypocrisy of modern American liberalism.[24] During one appearance at the University of Arizona, a pie was thrown at her.[25][26][27] Coulter has, on occasion, in defense of her ideas, responded with inflammatory remarks toward hecklers and protestors who attend her speeches.[28][29]

Coulter is the author of twelve books, including many that have appeared on The New York Times Best Seller list, with a combined 3 million copies sold as of May2009[update].[30]

Coulter's first book, High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton, was published by Regnery Publishing in 1998 and made The New York Times Bestseller list.[3] It details Coulter's case for the impeachment of President Bill Clinton.

Her second book, Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right, published by Crown Forum in 2002, reached the number one spot on The New York Times non-fiction best seller list.[31] In Slander, Coulter argues that President George W. Bush was given unfair negative media coverage. The factual accuracy of Slander was called into question by then-comedian and author, later Democratic U.S. Senator from Minnesota, Al Franken; he also accused her of citing passages out of context.[32] Others investigated these charges, and also raised questions about the book's accuracy and presentation of facts.[33][34] Coulter responded to criticisms in a column called "Answering My Critics".[35]

In her third book, Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, also published by Crown Forum, she reexamines the 60-year history of the Cold Warincluding the career of Senator Joseph McCarthy, the Whittaker Chambers-Alger Hiss affair, and Ronald Reagan's challenge to Mikhail Gorbachev to "tear down this wall"and argues that liberals were wrong in their Cold War political analyses and policy decisions, and that McCarthy was correct about Soviet agents working for the U.S. government.[36]She also argues that the correct identification of Annie Lee Moss, among others, as communists was misreported by the liberal media.[37]Treason was published in 2003, and spent 13 weeks on the Best Seller list.[38]

Crown Forum published a collection of Coulter's columns in 2004 as her fourth book, How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must): The World According to Ann Coulter.[39]

Coulter's fifth book, published by Crown Forum in 2006, is Godless: The Church of Liberalism.[40]In it, she argues, first, that American liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, and second, that it bears all the attributes of a religion itself.[41]Godless debuted at number one on the New York Times Best Seller list.[42] Some passages in the book match portions of others' writings published at an earlier time (including newspaper articles and a Planned Parenthood document), leading John Barrie of iThenticate to assert that Coulter had engaged in "textbook plagiarism".[43]

Coulter's If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans (Crown Forum), published in October 2007, and Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America (Crown Forum), published on January 6, 2009, both also achieved best-seller status.[44]

On June 7, 2011, Crown Forum published her eighth book Demonic: How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America.[45]

Her ninth book, published September 25, 2012, was Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama. It argues that liberals, and Democrats in particular, have taken undue credit for racial civil rights in America.[46]

Coulter's tenth book, Never Trust a Liberal Over 3 Especially a Republican, was released October 14, 2013. It is her second collection of columns and her first published by Regnery since her first book, High Crimes and Misdemeanors.[47] Coulter published her eleventh book, Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country Into a Third World Hellhole on June 1, 2015. The book addresses illegal immigration, amnesty programs, and border security in the United States.[48]

In the late 1990s, Coulter's weekly (biweekly from 1999 to 2000) syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate began appearing. Her column is featured on six conservative websites: Human Events Online, WorldNetDaily, Townhall.com, VDARE, FrontPage Magazine, Jewish World Review and her own website. Her syndicator says, "Ann's client newspapers stick with her because she has a loyal fan base of conservative readers who look forward to reading her columns in their local newspapers".[49]

In 1999, Coulter worked as a columnist for George magazine.[50][51] Coulter also wrote weekly columns for the conservative magazine Human Events between 1998 and 2003, with occasional columns thereafter. In her columns, she discussed judicial rulings, constitutional issues, and legal matters affecting Congress and the executive branch.[52]

In 2001, as a contributing editor and syndicated columnist for National Review Online (NRO), Coulter was asked by editors to make changes to a piece written after the September 11 attacks. On the show Politically Incorrect, Coulter accused NRO of censorship and said she was paid $5 per article. NRO dropped her column and terminated her editorship. Editor-at-large of NRO, Jonah Goldberg said: "We did not 'fire' Ann for what she wrote... we ended the relationship because she behaved with a total lack of professionalism, friendship, and loyalty [concerning the editing disagreement]."[53]

In August 2005, the Arizona Daily Star dropped Coulter's syndicated column, citing reader complaints: "Many readers find her shrill, bombastic, and mean-spirited. And those are the words used by readers who identified themselves as conservatives".[54]

In July 2006, some newspapers replaced Coulter's column with those of other conservative columnists following the publication of her fourth book, Godless: The Church of Liberalism.[55] After The Augusta Chronicle dropped her column, newspaper editor Michael Ryan said: "it came to the point where she was the issue rather than what she was writing about."[56] Ryan added that he continued himself "to be an Ann Coulter fan" as "her logic is devastating and her viewpoint is right most of the time."[56]

Coulter made her first national media appearance in 1996 after she was hired by the then-fledgling network MSNBC as a legal correspondent. She later appeared on CNN and Fox News.[57] Coulter went on to make frequent guest appearances on many television and radio talk shows.

Coulter appeared in three films released during 2004. The first was Feeding the Beast, a made-for-television documentary on the "24-Hour News Revolution".[58] The other two films were FahrenHYPE 9/11, a direct-to-video documentary rebuttal of Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 911, and Is It True What They Say About Ann?, a documentary on Coulter containing clips of interviews and speeches.[59] In 2015, Coulter had a cameo as the Vice President in the made-for-TV movie Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No!

Coulter is a Christian and belongs to the Presbyterian denomination.[60] She is a conservative columnist and in 2003, described herself as a "typical, immodest-dressing, swarthy male-loving, friend-to-homosexuals, ultra-conservative."[61] She is a registered Republican and former member of the advisory council of GOProud since August 9, 2011.[62]

She supports the display of the Confederate flag.[63] When her friend, Milo Yiannopoulos, initially defended pederasty,[64] Coulter commented, "Well, Milo learned HIS lesson. Pederasty acceptable only for refugees and illegals. Then libs will support you."[65]

Coulter believes Roe v. Wade should be overturned and left to the states. She is anti-abortion, but believes there should be an exception if a woman is raped.[66] However, in 2015, she prioritized the issue of immigration, stating: "I don't care if [Trump] wants to perform abortions in the White House after this immigration policy paper".[67]

Coulter was raised by a Catholic father and Protestant mother.[citation needed] At one public lecture she said: "I don't care about anything else; Christ died for my sins, and nothing else matters."[68] She summarized her view of Christianity in a 2004 column, saying, "Jesus' distinctive message was: People are sinful and need to be redeemed, and this is your lucky day, because I'm here to redeem you even though you don't deserve it, and I have to get the crap kicked out of me to do it." She then mocked "the message of Jesus... according to liberals", summarizing it as "something along the lines of 'be nice to people'", which, in turn, she said "is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity."[69]

Confronting some critics' views that her content and style of writing is unchristian,[70] Coulter said that she is "a Christian first and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second, and don't you ever forget it."[71] Six years later, in 2011, she also said: "Christianity fuels everything I write. Being a Christian means that I am called upon to do battle against lies, injustice, cruelty, hypocrisyyou know, all the virtues in the church of liberalism".[72] In Godless: The Church of Liberalism, Coulter characterized the theory of evolution as bogus science, and contrasted her beliefs to what she called the left's "obsession with Darwinism and the Darwinian view of the world, which replaces sanctification of life with sanctification of sex and death".[73] Coulter advocates intelligent design, a pseudoscientific antievolution ideology.[74][75]

Coulter endorsed the NSA's Terrorist Surveillance Program directed at Al-Qaeda.[76] During a 2011 appearance on Stossel, she said "PATRIOT Act, fantastic, Gitmo, fantastic, waterboarding, not bad, though torture would've been better."[77] She criticized Rand Paul for "this anti-drone stuff".[78]

Coulter opposes hate crime laws, calling them "unconstitutional". She also stated that "Hate-crime provisions seem vaguely directed at capturing a sense of cold-bloodedness, but the law can do that without elevating some victims over others."[79]

Coulter has criticized former president George W. Bush's immigration proposals, saying they led to "amnesty". In a 2007 column, she claimed that the current immigration system was set up to deliberately reduce the percentage of whites in the population. In it, she said:[80]

In 1960, whites were 90 percent of the country. The Census Bureau recently estimated that whites already account for less than two-thirds of the population and will be a minority by 2050. Other estimates put that day much sooner.One may assume the new majority will not be such compassionate overlords as the white majority has been. If this sort of drastic change were legally imposed on any group other than white Americans, it would be called genocide. Yet whites are called racists merely for mentioning the fact that current immigration law is intentionally designed to reduce their percentage in the population.

Coulter strongly opposes the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.[81] Regarding illegal immigration, she strongly opposed amnesty for undocumented immigrants, and at the 2013 CPAC said she has now become "a single-issue voter against amnesty".[82]

In June 2018, during the controversy caused by the Trump administration family separation policy, Coulter dismissed immigrant children as "child actors weeping and crying" and urged Trump not to "fall for it".[83]

Coulter opposes same-sex marriage, opposes Obergefell v. Hodges, and supports, after previously saying she did not, a federal U.S. constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union of one man and one woman.[84][85][86] She insists that her opposition to same-sex marriage "wasn't an anti-gay thing" and that "It's genuinely a pro-marriage position to oppose gay marriage".[87] Coulter argues that same-sex marriage would "ruin gay culture", because "gays value promiscuous sex over monogamy".[88] In an April 1, 2015, column, Coulter declared that liberals had "won the war on gay marriage (by judicial fiat)".[89]

Coulter also opposes civil unions[90] and privatizing marriage.[91] When addressed with the issue of rights granted by marriage, she said, "Gays already can visit loved ones in hospitals. They can also visit neighbors, random acquaintances, and total strangers in hospitalsjust like everyone else. Gays can also pass on property to whomever they would like".[92] She also stated that same-sex sexual intercourse was already protected under the Fourth Amendment, which prevents police from going into your home without a search warrant or court order.[93]

In regard to Romer v. Evans, in which the United Supreme Court overturned Article II, Section 30b of the Colorado Constitution, which prohibited the "State of Colorado, through any of its branches or departments, nor any of its agencies, political subdivisions, municipalities or school districts, shall enact, adopt or enforce any statute, regulation, ordinance or policy whereby homosexual, lesbian or bisexual orientation, conduct, practices or relationships shall constitute or otherwise be the basis of or entitle any person or class of persons to have or claim any minority status, quota preferences, protected status or claim of discrimination.", Coulter described the ruling as "they couldn't refuse to give affirmative action benefits to people who have sodomy".[94][95] She also disagreed with repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell, stating that it is not an "anti-gay position; it is a pro-military position" because "sexual bonds are disruptive to the military bond".[96] She also stated that there is "no proof that all the discharges for homosexuality involve actual homosexuals."[97] On April 1, 2015, in a column, she expressed support for Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act and said it was an "apocryphal" assertion to claim the Religious Freedom Restoration Act would be used to discriminate against LGBT people.[89] She expressed her support for the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruling.[98]

Coulter has expressed her opposition to treatment of LGBT people in the countries of Cuba, People's Republic of China, and Saudi Arabia.[99][100] Coulter opposes publicly funded sex reassignment surgery. She supports the Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act and opposes transgender individuals using bathrooms corresponding to their gender identity.[102][103] She says her opposition to bathroom usage corresponding to gender identity has nothing to do with transgender people, but cisgendered "child molesters" who "now has the right to go into that bathroom."[104] She supports banning transgender military service personnel from the United States military.[103]

Since the 1990s, Coulter has had many acquaintances in the LGBT community. She considers herself "the Judy Garland of the Right", reflecting Garland's large fan base from the gay community. In the last few years,[vague] she has attracted LGBT fans, namely gay men and drag queens.[88][105]

At the 2007 CPAC, Coulter said, "I do want to point out one thing that has been driving me crazy with the mediahow they keep describing Mitt Romney's position as being pro-gays, and that's going to upset the right wingers", and "Well, you know, screw you! I'm not anti-gay. We're against gay marriage. I don't want gays to be discriminated against." She added, "I don't know why all gays aren't Republican. I think we have the pro-gay positions, which is anti-crime and for tax cuts. Gays make a lot of money and they're victims of crime. No, they are! They should be with us."[106]

In Coulter's 2007 book If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans, in the chapter "Gays: No Gay Left Behind!", she argued that Republican policies were more pro-gay than Democratic policies. Coulter attended the 2010 HomoCon of GOProud, where she gave a speech about why gays should oppose same-sex marriage.[107] On February 9, 2011, in a column, she described the national Log Cabin Republicans as "ridiculous" and "not conservative at all". She did, however, describe the Texas branch of Log Cabin Republicans, for whom she has been signing books for years, as "comprised of real conservatives".[108]

At the 2011 CPAC, during her question-and-answer segment, Coulter was asked about GOProud and the controversy over their inclusion at the 2011 CPAC. She boasted how she talked GOProud into dropping its support for same-sex marriage in the party's platform, saying, "The left is trying to co-opt gays, and I don't think we should let them. I think they should be on our side", and "Gays are natural conservatives".[109] Later that year, she joined advisory board for GOProud. On Logos The A-List: Dallas she told gay Republican Taylor Garrett that "The gays have got to be pro-life", and "As soon as they find the gay gene, guess who the liberal yuppies are gonna start aborting?"[110]

Coulter strongly supports continuing the War on Drugs.[111] However, she has said that, if there were not a welfare state, she "wouldn't care" if drugs were legal.[112] She spoke about drugs as a guest on Piers Morgan Live, when she said that marijuana users "can't perform daily functions".[113]

Coulter is an advocate of the white genocide conspiracy theory.[114][115][116] She has compared non-white immigration into the United States with genocide,[117] and claiming that "a genocide" is occurring against South African farmers,[118] she has said that the Boers are the "only real refugees" in South Africa.[119][120] Regarding domestic politics, Vox labelled Coulter as one of many providing a voice for "the 'white genocide' myth",[121] and the SPLC covered Coulter's remarks that if the demographic changes occurring in the U.S. were being "legally imposed on any group other than white Americans, it would be called genocide".[122][80]

In April 2019, Coulter said of Senator Bernie Sanders she would vote and perhaps even work for him in the 2020 U.S. presidential election if he stuck to his "original position" on U.S. border policy. "If he went back to his original position, which is the pro blue-collar positionI mean, it totally makes sense with him," and "If he went back to that position, I'd vote for him, I might work for him. I don't care about the rest of the socialist stuff. Just, can we do something for ordinary Americans?"[123][124]

This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (March 2018)

Ann Coulter has described herself as a "polemicist" who likes to "stir up the pot" and does not "pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do".[125] While her political activities in the past have included advising a plaintiff suing President Bill Clinton as well as considering a run for Congress, she mostly serves as a political pundit, sometimes creating controversy ranging from rowdy uprisings at some of the colleges where she speaks to protracted discussions in the media.

Time magazine's John Cloud once observed that Coulter "likes to shock reporters by wondering aloud whether America might be better off if women lost the right to vote".[57] This was in reference to her statement that "it would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950except Goldwater in '64the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted."[61] Similarly, in an October 2007 interview with The New York Observer, Coulter said:[126]

If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day careand here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'

In addition to questioning whether women's right to vote is a good thing, Coulter has also appeared on Fox News and advocated for a poll tax and a literacy test for voters (this was in 1999, and she reiterated her support of a literacy test in 2015).[127] This is not a viewpoint widely shared by members of the Republican Party.

Coulter first became a public figure shortly before becoming an unpaid legal adviser for the attorneys representing Paula Jones in her sexual harassment suit against President Bill Clinton. Coulter's friend George Conway had been asked to assist Jones' attorneys, and shortly afterward Coulter, who wrote a column about the Paula Jones case for Human Events, was also asked to help, and she began writing legal briefs for the case.

Coulter later stated that she would come to mistrust the motives of Jones' head lawyer, Joseph Cammaratta, who by August or September 1997 was advising Jones that her case was weak and to settle, if a favorable settlement could be negotiated.[18][128] From the outset, Jones had sought an apology from Clinton at least as eagerly as she sought a settlement.[129] However, in a later interview Coulter recounted that she herself had believed that the case was strong, that Jones was telling the truth, that Clinton should be held publicly accountable for his misconduct, and that a settlement would give the impression that Jones was merely interested in extorting money from the President.[18]

David Daley, who wrote the interview piece for The Hartford Courant recounted what followed:

Coulter played one particularly key role in keeping the Jones case alive. In Newsweek reporter Michael Isikoff's new book Uncovering Clinton: A Reporter's Story, Coulter is unmasked as the one who leaked word of Clinton's "distinguishing characteristic"his reportedly bent penis that Jones said she could recognize and describeto the news media. Her hope was to foster mistrust between the Clinton and Jones camps and forestall a settlement ... I thought if I leaked the distinguishing characteristic it would show bad faith in negotiations. [Clinton lawyer] Bob Bennett would think Jones had leaked it. Cammaratta would know he himself hadn't leaked it and would get mad at Bennett. It might stall negotiations enough for me to get through to [Jones adviser] Susan Carpenter-McMillan to tell her that I thought settling would hurt Paula, that this would ruin her reputation, and that there were other lawyers working for her. Then 36 hours later, she returned my phone call. I just wanted to help Paula. I really think Paula Jones is a hero. I don't think I could have taken the abuse she came under. She's this poor little country girl and she has the most powerful man she's ever met hitting on her sexually, then denying it and smearing her as president. And she never did anything tacky. It's not like she was going on TV or trying to make a buck out of it."[18]

In his book, Isikoff also reported Coulter as saying: "We were terrified that Jones would settle. It was contrary to our purpose of bringing down the President."[128] After the book came out, Coulter clarified her stated motives, saying:

The only motive for leaking the distinguishing characteristic item that [Isikoff] gives in his book is my self-parodying remark that "it would humiliate the president" and that a settlement would foil our efforts to bring down the president ... I suppose you could take the position, as [Isikoff] does, that we were working for Jones because we thought Clinton was a lecherous, lying scumbag, but this argument gets a bit circular. You could also say that Juanita Broaddrick's secret motive in accusing Clinton of rape is that she hates Clinton because he raped her. The whole reason we didn't much like Clinton was that we could see he was the sort of man who would haul a low-level government employee like Paula to his hotel room, drop his pants, and say, "Kiss it." You know: Everything his defense said about him at the impeachment trial. It's not like we secretly disliked Clinton because of his administration's position on California's citrus cartels or something, and then set to work on some crazy scheme to destroy him using a pathological intern as our Mata Hari.[130]

The case went to court after Jones broke with Coulter and her original legal team, and it was dismissed via summary judgment. The judge ruled that even if her allegations proved true, Jones did not show that she had suffered any damages, stating, "... plaintiff has not demonstrated any tangible job detriment or adverse employment action for her refusal to submit to the governor's alleged advances. The president is therefore entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claim of quid pro quo sexual harassment." The ruling was appealed by Jones' lawyers. During the pendency of the appeal, Clinton settled with Jones for $850,000 ($151,000 after legal fees) in November 1998, in exchange for Jones' dismissal of the appeal. By then, the Jones lawsuit had given way to the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal.

In October 2000, Jones revealed that she would pose for nude pictures in an adult magazine, saying she wanted to use the money to pay taxes and support her grade-school-aged children, in particular saying, "I'm wanting to put them through college and maybe set up a college fund."[131] Coulter publicly denounced Jones, calling her "the trailer-park trash they said she was" (Coulter had earlier chastened Clinton supporters for calling Jones this name),[132] after Clinton's former campaign strategist James Carville had made the widely reported remark, "Drag a $100 bill through a trailer park, and you'll never know what you'll find", and called Jones a "fraud, at least to the extent of pretending to be an honorable and moral person".[131]

Coulter wrote:

Paula surely was given more than a million dollars in free legal assistance from an array of legal talent she will never again encounter in her life, much less have busily working on her behalf. Some of those lawyers never asked for or received a dime for hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal work performed at great professional, financial and personal cost to themselves. Others got partial payments out of the settlement. But at least they got her reputation back. And now she's thrown it away.[133]

Jones claimed not to have been offered any help with a book deal of her own or any other additional financial help after the lawsuit.[131]

In March 2013, Coulter was one of the keynote speakers at the Conservative Political Action Conference, where she made references to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's weight ("CPAC had to cut back on its speakers this year about 300 pounds") and progressive activist Sandra Fluke's hairdo. (Coulter quipped that Fluke didn't need birth control pills because "that haircut is birth control enough".) Coulter advocated against a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants because such new citizens would never vote for Republican candidates: "If amnesty goes through, America becomes California and no Republican will ever win another election."[134][135]

Since 2013, Coulter has been a contributor to VDARE, a far-right website and blog founded by anti-immigration activist and paleo-conservative Peter Brimelow.[136] Michael Malice has said that "Coulter and VDARE can be considered the furthest edge of the Overton Window" as any political position further to the right would be too heretical to find mainstream success.[137] VDARE is controversial because of its alleged white supremacist rhetoric and support of scientific racism and white nationalism.[138]

Coulter initially supported George W. Bush's presidency, but later criticized its approach to immigration. She endorsed Duncan Hunter[139] and later Mitt Romney in the 2008 Republican presidential primaries[140] and the 2012 Republican presidential primary and presidential run.[141] In the 2016 Republican Party presidential primaries, she endorsed Donald Trump.[142] Coulter later distanced herself from Trump following arguments over immigration policies; she called for his impeachment in September 2017, saying "Put a fork in Trump, he's dead".[143] She described herself in 2018 as a "former Trumper";[144] in a 2020 speech to a Turning Point USA event, she said, "The Trump agenda without Trump would be a lot easier. Our new motto should be 'Going on with Trumpism without Trump.' That's a winning strategy."[145] Coulter blamed Trump's son-in-law and advisor Jared Kushner for Trump's 2020 election loss, and said that Trump had failed to deliver for the white working class.[146]

Other candidates Coulter has endorsed include Greg Brannon (2014 Republican primary candidate for North Carolina Senator),[147] Paul Nehlen (2016 Republican primary candidate for Wisconsin's 1st congressional district in the United States House of Representatives),[148] Mo Brooks (2017 Republican primary candidate for Alabama Senator), and Roy Moore (2017 Republican candidate for Alabama Senator).[149]

Coulter's September 14, 2001 column eulogized her friend Barbara Olson, killed three days earlier in the September 11 attacks, and ended with a call for war:

Airports scrupulously apply the same laughably ineffective airport harassment to Suzy Chapstick as to Muslim hijackers. It is preposterous to assume every passenger is a potential crazed homicidal maniac. We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.[150]

These comments resulted in Coulter's being fired as a columnist by the National Review, which she subsequently referred to as "squeamish girly-boys".[151] Responding to this comment, Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations remarked in the Chicago Sun-Times that before September 11, Coulter "would have faced swift repudiation from her colleagues", but "now it's accepted as legitimate commentary".[152]

One day after the attacks (when death toll estimates were higher than later), Coulter asserted that only Muslims could have been behind them:

Not all Muslims may be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslimsat least all terrorists capable of assembling a murderous plot against America that leaves 7,000 people dead in under two hours.[153]

Coulter was highly critical in 2002 of the U.S. Department of Transportation and especially its then-secretary Norman Mineta. Her many criticisms include their refusal to use racial profiling as a component of airport screening.[154] After a group of Muslims was expelled from a US Airways flight when other passengers expressed concern, sparking a call for Muslims to boycott the airline because of the ejection from a flight of six imams, Coulter wrote:

If only we could get Muslims to boycott all airlines, we could dispense with airport security altogether.[155]

Coulter also cited the 2002 Senate testimony of FBI whistleblower Coleen Rowley, who was acclaimed for condemning her superiors for refusing to authorize a search warrant for 9-11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui when he refused to consent to a search of his computer. They knew that he was a Muslim in flight school who had overstayed his visa, and the French Intelligence Service had confirmed his affiliations with radical fundamentalist Islamic groups. Coulter said she agreed that probable cause existed in the case, but that refusing consent, being in flight school and overstaying a visa should not constitute grounds for a search. Citing a poll which found that 98 percent of Muslims between the ages of 20 and 45 said they would not fight for Britain in the war in Afghanistan, and that 48 percent said they would fight for Osama bin Laden she asserted "any Muslim who has attended a mosque in Europecertainly in England, where Moussaoui livedhas had 'affiliations with radical fundamentalist Islamic groups,'" so that she parsed Rowley's position as meaning that "'probable cause' existed to search Moussaoui's computer because he was a Muslim who had lived in England". Coulter says the poll was "by The Daily Telegraph", actually it was by Sunrise, an "Asian" (therefore an Indian subcontinent-oriented) radio station, canvassing the opinions of 500 Muslims in Greater London (not Britain as a whole), mainly of Pakistani origin and aged between 20 and 45. Because "FBI headquarters ... refused to engage in racial profiling", they failed to uncover the 9-11 plot, Coulter asserted. "The FBI allowed thousands of Americans to be slaughtered on the altar of political correctness. What more do liberals want?"[156]

Coulter wrote in another column that she had reviewed the civil rights lawsuits against certain airlines to determine which of them had subjected Arabs to the most "egregious discrimination" so that she could fly only that airline. She also said that the airline should be bragging instead of denying any of the charges of discrimination brought against them.[157] In an interview with The Guardian she said, "I think airlines ought to start advertising: 'We have the most civil rights lawsuits brought against us by Arabs.'" When the interviewer, Jonathan Freedland, replied by asking what Muslims would do for travel, she responded, "They could use flying carpets."[61]

In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing, Coulter told Hannity host Sean Hannity that the wife of bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev should be jailed for wearing a hijab. Coulter continued by saying "Assimilating immigrants into our culture isn't really working. They're assimilating us into their culture." (Tsarnaev's wife was American-born.)[158]

Coulter was accused of anti-semitism in an October 8, 2007, interview with Donny Deutsch on The Big Idea. During the interview, Coulter stated that the United States is a Christian nation, and said that she wants "Jews to be perfected, as they say" (referring to them being converted to Christianity).[159] Deutsch, a practicing Jew, implied that this was an anti-semitic remark, but Coulter said she didn't consider it to be a hateful comment.[160][161] Coulter's comments on the show were condemned by the Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Committee and Bradley Burston,[162] and the National Jewish Democratic Council asked media outlets to cease inviting Coulter as a guest commentator.[163] Talk show host Dennis Prager, while disagreeing with her comments, said that they were not "anti-semitic", noting, "There is nothing in what Ann Coulter said to a Jewish interviewer on CNBC that indicates she hates Jews or wishes them ill, or does damage to the Jewish people or the Jewish state. And if none of those criteria is present, how can someone be labeled anti-Semitic?"[164][165][166] Conservative activist David Horowitz also defended Coulter against the allegation.[167]

Coulter in September 2015 tweeted in response to multiple Republican candidates' references to Israel during a Presidential debate, "How many fing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?"[168] The Anti-Defamation League referred to the tweets as "ugly, spiteful and anti-Semitic".[169] In response to accusations of anti-Semitism, she tweeted "I like the Jews, I like fetuses, I like Reagan. Didn't need to hear applause lines about them all night."[168]

In October 2001, Coulter was accused of plagiarism for her 1998 book High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton by Michael Chapman, a columnist for the journal Human Events who claims that passages were taken from a supplement he wrote for the journal in 1997 titled "A Case for Impeachment".[151]

On the July 5, 2006, episode of Countdown with Keith Olbermann on MSNBC, guest John Barrie, the CEO of iParadigms, offered his professional opinion that Coulter plagiarized in her book Godless as well as in her columns over the previous year.[170] Barrie ran "Godless" through iThenticate, his company's machine which is able to scan works and compare them to existing texts. He found a 25 word section of the text that was "virtually word-for-word" matched a Planned Parenthood pamphlet and a 33 word section almost duplicating a 1999 article from the Portland Press as some examples of evidence.[170] Barrie also said that it was "very, very difficult to try to determine whether Ann Coulter was citing that material or whether she was just trying to pass it off".[170]

Left wing activist group[171] Media Matters for America has appealed to Random House publishing to further investigate Coulter's work.[172] The syndicator of her columns cleared her of the plagiarism charges.[173] Universal Press Syndicate and Crown Books also defended Coulter against the charges.[174]Columnist Bill Nemitz from the Portland Press Herald accused Coulter of plagiarizing a very specific sentence from his newspaper in her book Godless, but he also acknowledged that one sentence is insufficient grounds for filing suit.[175]

Coulter rejects "the academic convention of euphemism and circumlocution",[176] and is claimed to play to misogyny in order to further her goals; she "dominates without threatening (at least not straight men)".[177] Feminist critics also reject Coulter's opinion that the gains made by women have gone so far as to create an anti-male society[178] and her call for women to be rejected from the military because they are more vicious than men.[179] Like the late anti-feminist Phyllis Schlafly, Coulter uses traditionally masculine rhetoric as reasoning for the need for traditional gender roles, and she carries this idea of feminized dependency into her governmental policies, according to feminist critics.[180]

Coulter has been engaged several times, but she has never married and has no children.[28] She has dated Spin founder and publisher Bob Guccione Jr.[50] and conservative writer Dinesh D'Souza.[181][182] In October 2007, she began dating Andrew Stein, the former president of the New York City Council, a liberal Democrat. When asked about the relationship, Stein told the New York Post, "She's attacked a lot of my friends, but what can I say, opposites attract!"[183] On January 7, 2008, however, Stein told the New York Post that the relationship was over, citing irreconcilable differences.[184] Kellyanne Conway, who refers to Coulter as a friend, told New York magazine in 2017 that Coulter "started dating her security guard probably ten years ago because she couldn't see anybody else".[185]

Coulter owns a house, bought in 2005, in Palm Beach, Florida, a condominium in Manhattan, and an apartment in Los Angeles. She votes in Palm Beach and is not registered to do so in New York or California.[186]

Go here to see the original:
Ann Coulter - Wikipedia

Read More..

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter speaks at Missouri State …

Andrew Jansen/News-Leader Conservative pundit Ann Coulter spoke to a large crowd at Glass Hall on the Missouri State University campus on Thursday, Oct. 21, 2021.

Speaking before a more than 150-person crowd includingelected officials, conservative pundit Ann Coulter urgedMissouri State Universityconservatives to focus on the issues of crime, immigration, and wokeness to win elections.

The Republican firebrand also doubled down Thursday night on her controversial view thatwomen should not have the right to votebecause women see the government as their husbands.

Coulter was invited by the MSU chapter of Turning PointUSA, a nationwidecollege campus conservative advocacy group.The event was also organized by the Leadership Institute, which "identifies, trains, recruits and places conservativesin politics,government, andmedia, according to their website.

While introducing Coulter,Missouri State TPUSA presidentLoren Rutherfordsaid she was incrediblygrateful that Coulter decided to invest in our students today by bringing her thoughts and ideas to Missouri State.

Rutherford also noted that college campuses are a place where controversial ideas should be heard.

Many students on this campus made it clear that her ideas were dangerous and unwelcome here in this pivotal moment in our country where wrong is right and two plus two is five. When you are threatened with violence for daring to think differently, Ann Coulter is a necessary voice to bring to the table.

The first student-submitted question Coulter was askedreferenced Coulters long-time beliefthat women should not have the right to vote.

If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, she said in a 2007 New York Observer interview.

Asked about this controversial statement Thursday, Coulter doubled down.

Yeah, Id give up my vote in a heartbeat as long as the rest of you stop voting... she said. Women see the government as their husbands. I mean when you look at theDemocrats gettingin thereand spending$4 trillion... wherever women are given the vote in whatever state, in whatever country you see spendinggoing through the roof.

Her presentation was attended by Greene County Clerk Shane SchoellerandStateSenator Mike Moon, who is currently vying for the Republican nomination in southwest Missouri's 7th Congressional District.

Schoeller told the News-Leader he attended the event after being invited by a student leader who organized it.

Though sayingas a conservative Ienjoy the opportunity to attend events like this, Schoellerclarified that he believeswomen should have the right to vote.

The 19th amendment was absolutely the right thing to do when the American people added it to our U.S. Constitution in 1920giving women the right to vote. Ifirmly believethat and would never advocate or think otherwise, he told the News-Leader.

In her presentation, Coulter urged conservatives to focus on three issues in the upcoming midterm election: crime, immigration, and "wokeness."

While saying there is very little the government can do to improve lives, it can reduce crime.

Coulter said following the racial reckoning of 2020 precipitated by the death of George Floyd,themurder rate increased by 29 percent from 2019 to 2020, which she characterized as the largest one-year-jump ever.

Homicides did increaseby 25 percent in 2020, but crimedecreased overall.Violent crime increased by 3.3 percent, while property crime decreased by 7.9 percent.

What is the smug, self-satisfied, head-up-their-butt liberal response to the burgeoning crime rate?Itsto,you know, say, letsput it in perspective, Coulter said.

The point is when they dismiss concerns over crime, that's when you know you'reon the targetthey don't take it seriously. They are scaredabout it. This is what conservatives should be talking abouttalkingtheir heads off on the crime rate that affects everyone.

Coulter placed the blame of increased crime on the Black Lives Matter movement, saying they dont care about black lives, just black criminals.

She added that crimedisproportionallyaffects black and brown Americans, which is whyHispanicvoters shiftedfour percentage points towardTrump in the 2020 election.

Coulter also argued that shift occurred because manyHispanic Americansdo not want to seemassimmigration displacingtheir jobs.

Blacks and Hispanics are hurt by immigration most of allby low-wage workers taking their jobs, she said.

Coulter argued that Republicans can bolster their anti-elitecredentials by strongly opposing immigration.

Who wants massillegalimmigration? Somebodywants it, oritwouldn'tkeep happening.Of course,the rich want it. They want to drive theiremployees'wages down.The rich are doingreally welland they want some nannies andmaidsand chauffeurs. The Chamber of Commerce will tell usimmigrants are doing the jobsAmericans justwontdo, but...Americans have always done these jobs the pricefor their labor just keeps being pushed down and down by the rich.

Coulter made an equally anti-establishment argument on what she called wokeness.

Wokeness is perfect for the upper class. They get to completely forget about income inequality, which hasgone through the roof. But no, theydon'thave to worry about that. They just make sure their kids get into Harvard and are preening about minorities. Somebody is going to get the short end of the stick, but that'snot going to be their kids. No,it'llbe the white working class, who theyalways kind-of hatedanyway.

Because of itsability to be co-opted by the rich elite, Coulter called anti-racism the basis for all terrible ideas.

Asked about whether former President Donald Trump should run for the office again in 2024, shesaid by God I hope notand claimed he would not win the nomination andcould screw up the race for the rest of the party.

WhatI'mlooking forinthe next Republican presidential candidate is Trumpism without Trump, she said.

Coulter explained that Trumpwould likelyrun on his baseless allegations of voter fraud, which she said is not a good electoral strategy.

Nowhe'sgoing around saying the mostimportant issueis the 2020 election fraud. This never, ever, everworks. Remember he lost Georgia foryou,he will do the same thing in the midterms, will do the same thing in the presidential election, Coulter said. When you lose an election, it never pays offto contest iteven if you have had an election openly stolen from you.Don'tcomplain about it.Don'tdemand a recount. Accept your loss, and run again.

This article originally appeared on Springfield News-Leader: Conservative pundit Ann Coulter speaks at Missouri State, says women shouldn't have the right to vote

Read more:
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter speaks at Missouri State ...

Read More..

Meet Ann Coulter, the man born Jeremy Levinsohn in New …

The person known today as Ann Coulter was born Jeremy Levinsohn in a village in New York in 1960. His parents were typical latte-drinking liberals, religiously conservative, but socially and politically radical. His father taught Russian Literature at CUNY and his mother was a social worker.

His childhood friend Rodger Mihalot described him, The Levinsohns were nice people, but his father was distant, so Jeremy seemed to seek a strong male figure in his life. Although they were Jewish, he often hung out at our church, and really seemed to spend a lot of time with Fr. Donatella Nowunn. I also think he was really looking to rebel against his overly liberal parents. Otherwise he was a typical kid, he liked to play cowboy, sailor and gladiator a lot. His favorite movie was always The Sheik, he really seemed to have a fascination with Arabs, I dont know why.

Ms. Coulter, a.k.a. Pudenda Shenanigans, in an undated photo taken in Key West.

In the 70s Jeremy went to Brandeis, where he majored in Sociology, with a minor in comparative religions. His lifelong fascination with Muslims really seemed to take root at Brandeis. But college roommate Ima Gaiboyye described an unhappy man, He was never really interested in women, but did go see the theater companys production of The Wizard of Oz 10 times, I thought he liked the girl who played the lead, he really talked about her outfit a lot. After college Jeremy just dropped off the face of the earth, we never heard from him again.

Jeremy drifted for awhile before finding himself in Key West. Co-worker Licky Dickenstein described these early years, Jeremy was a natural, I never saw anyone take to drag so quickly. Once he found his persona, he was Pudenda Shenanigans. For most of us drag was a part time thing, but Pudenda was 24-7, always in character, always in costume. She really shook things up, she was a goddess on stage.

Ms. Shenanigans and companion in New Orleans during Mardi Gras, 1987.

Former boss Phil Yoras recalled those heady days, Pudenda was really popular with all the celebrities who came in. She really worked the Republicans. Dennis Hastert, Rush Limbaugh, Bill OReilly, Dick Cheney, they all used to sit right up front for her shows. Arnold Schwarzenegger used to be her favorite, but once she dressed in lederhosen and tried to do My Favorite Things while sitting on his lap. That was the last time Arnold came in. Of course he left holding a plate in front of his pants, I dont know why.

By 1985 Ms Shenanigans was dating a Lebanese businessman, Ustahav Toubohls and the two were believed to be deliriously happy. Friends report Pudenda always had a fetish for Muslims and was considering a marriage proposal. But then she opened up the New York Times one day and saw a picture of Mr. Toubohls with a famous actress in New York. Former friend Gaivit Tuhym described the result, Pudenda was devastated, she couldnt stand seeing her Toubohls with another woman. She cried and cried, I miss my Toubohls, I want my Toubohls back! I dont think she ever forgave him, the New York Times, or Muslims in general.

After that Ms. Shenanigans disappeared for years, only resurfacing in the 90s as Ann Coulter. Her hatred for Muslims, gays and feminists is odd for her former coworkers. Long Dick Gone, a former co-worker stated, At first I thought there was something funny about this Ann Coulter. I mean heres a woman who claims to hate feminists, but is in her 40s, single, no kids, is very opinionated and outspoken and concentrates on her career. Ann Coulter is the biggest example of a feminist I ever saw. Then I noticed that in just the right light you could see that adams apple and thats when I recognized our little Pudenda Shenanigans, the hottest drag queen this side of Fire Island.Strap-On Veterans For Truth

Once they realized who Ann Coulter was, Strap-On Veterans For Truth was formed. Anns former friends and co-workers realized that her intense hatred of gays, feminists and Muslims was really self-loathing and continuing hurt from the loss of her beloved Toubohls. Although we know shes been through a lot, we feel hurt by her turning against everything she used to hold dear. We love you Ann, or Pudenda, or Jeremy. We respect whatever lifestyle of gender you choose. We just want you to be true to yourself and please stop the hatred. Come back to us and share the love of your friends and community again.

hoolinet.com

Read the original post:
Meet Ann Coulter, the man born Jeremy Levinsohn in New ...

Read More..

Ann Coulter Tells True Story of Being Banned from Fox News

Ann Coulter revealed details of how she was banned and subsequently unbanned from Fox News Channel in a Wednesday-aired interview on SiriusXMs Breitbart News Daily with host Alex Marlow.

Marlow drew on a recently published New Yorker column referencing Coulters recollection of a conversation she had with President Donald Trump regarding the aforementioned banning.

There was a great anecdote in there where you were banned from Fox and then Trump got you unbanned instantly, said Marlow. That was pretty funny.

LISTEN:

Coulter noticed the anecdote as shared by Anntensity, a fan profile on Twitter dedicated to her.

Coulter replied:

I saw that. It was tweeted on Anntensity, a fantastic Ann fan Twitter site. And only as a point of pride I would like to point out that technically it was during the transition I was telling I was begging the president to hire Kris Kobach at HHS. He said, Murdoch is calling me every day, Im only saying this because its out now, anyway Murdochs calling me every day, and I said, Yeah, he opposed you during the campaign and got me banned from Fox when I supported you. Look, Im giving up my career to get you in the White House. Please, just hire Kris Kobach, and he said, Oh, wait. Youre not allowed on Fox? Want me to call Murdoch?And as a point of pride, Id like to say that I said, No. No, Mr. President-elect. All I care about is that you hire Kris Kobach. Were trying to save the country, here.

Coulter then revealed, It was later when I found out it wasnt Murdoch, at all. It was always Hannity. Turns out it wasnt Murdoch, at all. So I guess he called Hannity.

[Former] Goldman Sachs employees have served Trump so well, mused Coulter sarcastically. Its great that Gary Cohn leaked that thing this week about how Trump ordered him to crush some merger because CNN has been bad to him. Yeah, that was fantastic. It was great that you brought in Gary Cohn. Who wouldve thought that hed be a traitor, Mr. President?

It looks really, really bad, said Coulter of claims that Trump directed former White House economic adviser Gary Cohn to block a merger between AT&T and Time Warner: It may not be against the law, but that looks bad if true.

Who did that [allegation] come from? added Coulter, speculating that Cohn shared the aforementioned allegation with the New Yorker. Just the most loyal person you will ever find: Gary Cohn from Goldman Sachs. Another great hire by Jared, she quipped.

President Kushner, joked Coulter along with other members of Trumps family had brought in all the Never Trumpers, and the RNC; the precise people he was running against in order to win the nomination.

Breitbart News Daily broadcasts live on SiriusXM Patriot 125 weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Eastern.

Follow Robert Kraychik onTwitter.

Read the rest here:
Ann Coulter Tells True Story of Being Banned from Fox News

Read More..

Coulter Brawls With Black Boyfriend After She Tests …

Ann Coulter (Gage Skidmore)

By Megan Prince

Right-wing commentator Ann Coulter got into a highly-publicized fight with her boyfriend after she tested positive for both an STD and the coronavirus, according to news reports. The brawl took place at Coulters Los Angeles home.

During the fight, Coulter and her African American boyfriend both flung items at each other. According to people on the scene, the items included dildos and interracial group sex videos. This is curious since most of Coulters audience is made up of old, racist white men.

Coulter was alleged to have said getting the virus would make her look stupid.

Like many Republicans, Coulter downplayed the existence of COVID-19.

On Tuesday evening, conservative commentator Ann Coulter tweeted out that chart, along with a curious misinterpretation of the data presented: For people under 60, coronavirus is LESS dangerous than the seasonal flu. (said Coulter in a tweet,) said Business Insider.

Several news stories have detailed how coronavirus denialism was widespread on the right. State TV, aka FOX News, is currently being sued after claiming the virus was a hoax for several months. FOX News owners learned about the dangers of the virus as far back as January.

However, an in-depth story by The Washington Post revealed that the Trump administration also encouraged its supporters to discount warnings about the coronavirus.

Republican leaders were poring over grim polling data that suggested Trump was lulling his followers into a false sense of security in the face of a lethal threat, said The Post. The poll showed that far more Republicans than Democrats were being influenced by Trumps dismissive depictions of the virus and the comparably scornful coverage on Fox News and other conservative networks. As a result, Republicans were in distressingly large numbers refusing to change travel plans, follow social distancing guidelines, stock up on supplies or otherwise take the coronavirus threat seriously.

But even today, after both FOX and Trump are trying to backtrack on the dangers of the coronavirus, many Trump supporters in red states still refuse to believe the disease is real.

Right now Louisiana currently has the fastest growth rate in coronavirus infections. And the governors of Mississipi and Alabama have both refused to shut down their states.

Read more:
Coulter Brawls With Black Boyfriend After She Tests ...

Read More..

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter speaks at Missouri State, says women shouldn’t have the right to vote – News-Leader

Speaking before a more than 150-person crowd includingelected officials, conservative pundit Ann Coulter urgedMissouri State Universityconservatives to focus on the issues of crime, immigration, and wokeness to win elections.

The Republican firebrand also doubled down Thursday night on her controversial view thatwomen should not have the right to votebecause women see the government as their husbands.

Coulter was invited by the MSU chapter of Turning PointUSA, a nationwidecollege campus conservative advocacy group.The event was also organized by the Leadership Institute, which "identifies, trains, recruits and places conservativesin politics,government, andmedia, according to their website.

While introducing Coulter,Missouri State TPUSA presidentLoren Rutherfordsaid she was incrediblygrateful that Coulter decided to invest in our students today by bringing her thoughts and ideas to Missouri State.

Rutherford also noted that college campuses are a place where controversial ideas should be heard.

Many students on this campus made it clear that her ideas were dangerous and unwelcome here in this pivotal moment in our country where wrong is right and two plus two is five. When you are threatened with violence for daring to think differently, Ann Coulter is a necessary voice to bring to the table.

The first student-submitted question Coulter was askedreferenced Coulters long-time beliefthat women should not have the right to vote.

If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, she said in a 2007 New York Observer interview.

Asked about this controversial statement Thursday, Coulter doubled down.

Yeah, Id give up my vote in a heartbeat as long as the rest of you stop voting... she said. Women see the government as their husbands. I mean when you look at theDemocrats gettingin thereand spending$4 trillion... wherever women are given the vote in whatever state, in whatever country you see spendinggoing through the roof.

Her presentation was attended by Greene County Clerk Shane SchoellerandStateSenator Mike Moon, who is currently vying for the Republican nomination in southwest Missouri's 7th Congressional District.

Schoeller told the News-Leader he attended the event after being invited by a student leader who organized it.

Though sayingas a conservative Ienjoy the opportunity to attend events like this, Schoellerclarified that he believeswomen should have the right to vote.

The 19th amendment was absolutely the right thing to do when the American people added it to our U.S. Constitution in 1920giving women the right to vote. Ifirmly believethat and would never advocate or think otherwise, he told the News-Leader.

In her presentation, Coulter urged conservatives to focus on three issues in the upcoming midterm election: crime, immigration, and "wokeness."

While saying there is very little the government can do to improve lives, it can reduce crime.

Coulter said following the racial reckoning of 2020 precipitated by the death of George Floyd,themurder rate increased by 29 percent from 2019 to 2020, which she characterized as the largest one-year-jump ever.

Homicides did increaseby 25 percent in 2020, but crimedecreased overall.Violent crime increased by 3.3 percent, while property crime decreased by 7.9 percent.

What is the smug, self-satisfied, head-up-their-butt liberal response to the burgeoning crime rate?Itsto,you know, say, letsput it in perspective, Coulter said.

The point is when they dismiss concerns over crime, that's when you know you'reon the targetthey don't take it seriously. They are scaredabout it. This is what conservatives should be talking abouttalkingtheir heads off on the crime rate that affects everyone.

Coulter placed the blame of increased crime on the Black Lives Matter movement, saying they dont care about black lives, just black criminals.

She added that crimedisproportionallyaffects black and brown Americans, which is whyHispanicvoters shiftedfour percentage points towardTrump in the 2020 election.

Coulter also argued that shift occurred because manyHispanic Americansdo not want to seemassimmigration displacingtheir jobs.

Blacks and Hispanics are hurt by immigration most of allby low-wage workers taking their jobs, she said.

Coulter argued that Republicans can bolster their anti-elitecredentials by strongly opposing immigration.

Who wants massillegalimmigration? Somebodywants it, oritwouldn'tkeep happening.Of course,the rich want it. They want to drive theiremployees'wages down.The rich are doingreally welland they want some nannies andmaidsand chauffeurs. The Chamber of Commerce will tell usimmigrants are doing the jobsAmericans justwontdo, but...Americans have always done these jobs the pricefor their labor just keeps being pushed down and down by the rich.

Coulter made an equally anti-establishment argument on what she called wokeness.

Wokeness is perfect for the upper class. They get to completely forget about income inequality, which hasgone through the roof. But no, theydon'thave to worry about that. They just make sure their kids get into Harvard and are preening about minorities. Somebody is going to get the short end of the stick, but that'snot going to be their kids. No,it'llbe the white working class, who theyalways kind-of hatedanyway.

Because of itsability to be co-opted by the rich elite, Coulter called anti-racism the basis for all terrible ideas.

Asked about whether former President Donald Trump should run for the office again in 2024, shesaid by God I hope notand claimed he would not win the nomination andcould screw up the race for the rest of the party.

WhatI'mlooking forinthe next Republican presidential candidate is Trumpism without Trump, she said.

Coulter explained that Trumpwould likelyrun on his baseless allegations of voter fraud, which she said is not a good electoral strategy.

Nowhe'sgoing around saying the mostimportant issueis the 2020 election fraud. This never, ever, everworks. Remember he lost Georgia foryou,he will do the same thing in the midterms, will do the same thing in the presidential election, Coulter said. When you lose an election, it never pays offto contest iteven if you have had an election openly stolen from you.Don'tcomplain about it.Don'tdemand a recount. Accept your loss, and run again.

Continue reading here:
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter speaks at Missouri State, says women shouldn't have the right to vote - News-Leader

Read More..

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter speaks at Glass Hall – Standard Online

Ann Coulter, conservative pundit, author and lawyer, was invited by MSU chapter Turning Point USA and Leadership Institute to give her speech, Liberals Gone Mad and Republicans Sleep.

Coulter spoke on crime, immigration and the danger of wokeness on Oct. 21 at Glass Hall. Students, staff and members of the community attended.

Posters of Coulters past quotes were displayed around campus and captioned, Your ideas are not welcome here. Certain posters featured Coulters quotes about her belief in taking the right to vote away from women.

A question from the audience gave Coulter a chance to elaborate and affirm her belief. She said, Wed just be so much better off if women didnt vote. She explained, I suspect it is because women see the government as their husbands. She said women vote for costly bills such as childcare and healthcare.

Turning Point USA is a student organization for conservative thinkers and challenges the liberal bias on college campuses. President Brett Dudenhoeffer said he was happy to have Coulter speak on campus.

Ian Tucker, a sophomore, said it was exciting and nice to have a conservative speaker on campus, especially since he is a political science major.

Subscribe to The Standard's free weekly newsletterhere.

Follow this link:
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter speaks at Glass Hall - Standard Online

Read More..

Book review: ‘Going There’ | Work | bgdailynews.com – Bowling Green Daily News

Going There by Katie Couric. Little, Brown. 510 pp. $30. Review provided by The Washington Post.

A crucial element of a successful morning show is the impression that the hosts sitting behind the desk really like the audience and one another. When that impression breaks down, when viewers detect tension or worse they often revolt, and ratings slide (see: Jane Pauley and Ann Curry).

No such indignity befell Katie Couric during her 15 years as the reigning queen of morning television at the Today show. Cheery, prepared and endlessly good-natured, Couric became Americas sweetheart.

But that was not the full picture. Couric warns in her new memoir, Going There, that as much as people thought they knew her, they saw only a neatly cropped version. Though she seemed so familiar, she writes that real life the complications and contradictions, the messy parts remains outside the frame.

Couric attempts to fill in those messy parts, to demystify herself and the world she inhabits. What readers learn is that behind that chipper veneer there was a sharper-edged, savvier figure quietly taking notes and judging everyone.

If she is attempting to prove that she is not as nice as her on-air persona, she succeeds.

Her descriptions can be unsparing. As a 22-year-old desk assistant, she spots the legendary White House correspondent Helen Thomas, whom she describes as looking like a harried housewife in a sea of men. CNN founder Ted Turner delivers slurred speeches and appears to be three sheets to the wind. It took prison time for Martha Stewart to develop a sense of humor. Prince Harry reeks of cigarettes, and alcohol seems to ooze from every pore.

If Courics memoir settles scores, it also forces her to reckon with her past self. Looking back at her old interviews, she finds that she has a lot of explaining to do. She cringes when she examines some of her choices, like when she repeatedly highlighted White crime victims rather than Black ones, or the cutthroat booking wars between dueling shows that racked up professional wins and losses as a result of so much violence and misery. She admits censoring part of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburgs criticism of Colin Kaepernick because she was a big RBG fan and wanted to protect her from a blind spot.

She excavates skeletons, including those in her family tree, which is blighted with racists on one side and holds nearly hidden Judaism on the other. Her grandfather gifted her father with a first edition of The Clansman: An Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan, with a glowing inscription to never destroy the book. Her first husband, Jay Monahan, was a fan of the Confederacy and Civil War reenactments; Couric honored this with an Old South-themed 40th birthday party for him. He died two years later of colon cancer, a death she mourns to this day, even as her daughters continue to struggle with his legacy.

Couric, now at retirement age, feels like shes writing from a bygone era. She started her career in the time of The Mary Tyler Moore Show, transfixed by the ambitious, independent heroine setting out for a career in TV news. Her reaction: Gee ... I want to turn the world on with my smile too!

And she did. Courics rise begins during her early years at ABC News, where she encountered media stars such as Sam Donaldson, Brit Hume and Carl Bernstein, who was the new Washington bureau chief seven years after breaking Watergate with Bob Woodward.

She moves to the nascent CNN, where, after an on-air appearance, the president of the network calls Courics boss to say he never wants to see you on air again. The lesson she took was not that she should find another profession but that she just needed to practice this one a bit more.

She moved to Atlanta to work as an associate producer but never gave up the dream of being on air. She visited a voice coach to learn how to speak with a deeper tenor.

An early hero is Pauley, a Today show co-host. Couric writes of attending an industry black-tie dinner where her knuckles thrillingly grazed Pauleys gown. Afterward, she and her colleague went home and French-braided their hair just like Pauleys.

But her real North Star is her father, who had to give up print journalism for a more lucrative profession in public relations to support the family. Couric writes lovingly about how she was always trying to impress him and to use her success as a way to make up for his forced departure from journalism.

Her ascent occurs against a backdrop of constant, casual sexism. She recounts the time as a young CNN staffer when Larry King came on to her The lunge. The tongue. The hands. She writes of a superior at CNN who said in front of a group that she was successful because of her determination, hard work, intelligence and breast size. (Couric wrote him a memo demanding an apology, which he grudgingly provided.)

Later, at NBC, after she rose to co-host the Today show alongside Matt Lauer, Couric writes that salacious tales about who was shagging whom were practically part of the news cycle. Women had to navigate: Some cheerfully deflected advances, defusing the moment with humor. Others willingly participated, having flings for the fun of it, a no-harm-no-foul mentality. Some leveraged the situation, accommodating a supervisors desires for the sake of their careers. Still others objected and risked being marginalized, demoted, even fired for some cooked-up reason.

Throughout, Couric balances her success as the upbeat gal on the morning show with her craving to be taken seriously. Her desire to impress her father and make her mark never escaped her and eventually led her to become the first female solo anchor of a nightly news broadcast, at CBS News.

There, she encountered what she describes as real, career-blunting sexism. She reserves particular ire for the now-disgraced Jeff Fager of 60 Minutes, with a receding hairline and puffy eyelids, whom she describes as cutting her out of big stories and undermining her at every turn.

By this point, Couric had long been uber-wealthy, her life buffered from reality by live-in help, cars and drivers, and fame. But her failure to hold on to her serious journalism job at CBS News left her dejected and defeated. She moved to a short-lived syndicated talk show, then to Yahoo and then later to the safety of her own production company.

Toward the end of the book, when Lauer was ousted from NBC and the Today show amid allegations of sexual harassment and assault, Couric professes confusion about the beloved co-host she knew and the sexual predator she was reading about. These pages are a navigational challenge for Couric, as she threads her way through reputational land mines that she barely escapes. But with Lauer protected all around by professional sycophants and facilitators, Couric was hardly the only one who didnt pick up on his transgressions. She produces real-time texts as evidence of their deteriorating rapport; eventually, she realized that their relationship was so broken by the scandal that theyd never speak again.

One cant help but feel that Couric got out of the highest-profile part of the business in the nick of time. When she interviewed Ann Coulter in 2002, she found her hate-based non-logic hard to respond to. How would Couric manage the moment we live in now, with near-constant attacks on the mainstream media?

She doesnt need to worry much about how she fits into the media landscape today. She and her husband are wealthy enough to have created Katie Couric Media, a company where she can practice journalism exactly how she wants, without having to rely on some network bozo to decide if shes still got it.

Couric has not written a capital-J journalism tome, self-righteously outlining the highest ideals of her profession. Rather, she pulls back the curtain on her life and times in the business, with much to celebrate and apologize for.

Most of the tabloid attention on the memoir focuses on the criticisms Couric doles out to fellow famous media and political types. Her cohort may be offended by the anecdotes she has shared.

But as she blows up the charade of her chipper morning-show self, she is getting the thing that matters most in media, regardless of age or experience: attention.

Reviewed by Sarah Ellison, who is a staff writer for The Washington Post.

More here:
Book review: 'Going There' | Work | bgdailynews.com - Bowling Green Daily News

Read More..

GitHub – deepmind/deepmind-research: This repository …

GitHub - deepmind/deepmind-research: This repository contains implementations and illustrative code to accompany DeepMind publications Files Permalink Failed to load latest commit information.

Type

Name

Latest commit message

Commit time

This repository contains implementations and illustrative code to accompanyDeepMind publications. Along with publishing papers to accompany researchconducted at DeepMind, we release open-sourceenvironments,data sets,and code toenable the broader research community to engage with our work and build upon it,with the ultimate goal of accelerating scientific progress to benefit society.For example, you can build on our implementations of theDeep Q-Network orDifferential Neural Computer, or experimentin the same environments we use for our research, such asDeepMind Lab orStarCraft II.

If you enjoy building tools, environments, software libraries, and otherinfrastructure of the kind listed below, you can view open positions to work inrelated areas on our careers page.

For a full list of our publications, please seehttps://deepmind.com/research/publications/

This is not an official Google product.

This repository contains implementations and illustrative code to accompany DeepMind publications

Read this article:
GitHub - deepmind/deepmind-research: This repository ...

Read More..

Why DeepMind Acquired This Robotics Startup – Analytics India Magazine

Earlier this week, Alphabet-owned DeepMind acquired a physics simulation platform MuJoCo, which stands for Multi-Joint Dynamics with Contact.

After the acquisition, the DeepMind Robotics Simulation team, which had been using MuJoCo in the past, is planning to fully open-source the platform in 2022 and make it freely available for everyone to support research everywhere.

Check out the GitHub repository of MuJoCo here. This will be its future home for this platform. However, for now, you can download the latest version of MuJoCo 2.1.0 for free on its website.

MuJoCo was first developed by Emo Todorov for Roboti and was available as a commercial product from 2015 to 2021. After DeepMind acquired MuJoCo, it is making it freely available to everyone. However, the details of the financial transactions are yet to be disclosed.

Post-acquisition, Roboti will continue to support existing paid licenses until they expire. In addition, the legacy MuJoCo release (versions 2.0 and earlier) will remain available for download, with a free activation key file, valid until October 2031.

MuJoCo is a physics engine that aims to facilitate research and development in robotics, graphics, biomechanics, animation, and other domains requiring fast and accurate simulation. It is one of the first full-featured simulators designed from scratch for model-based optimisation, particularly through contacts.

The platform makes it possible to scale up computationally intensive techniques such as optimal control, physically consistent state estimation, system identification and automated mechanism design and apply them to complex dynamical systems in contact-rich behaviours. Plus, it has more traditional applications such as testing and validating control schemes before deployment on physical robots, interactive scientific visualisation, virtual environments, animation, and gaming.

DeepMind MuJoCo is not alone. Other simulator platforms include Facebooks Habitat 2.0 and AI2s ManipulaTHOR. However, what sets them apart is its contact model, which accurately and efficiently captures the salient features of contacting objects. Like other rigid-body simulators, it avoids the fine details of deformations at the contact site and often runs much faster than in real-time.

Unlike other simulators, MuJoCo resolves contact forces using the convex Gauss Principle, said the DeepMind Robotics Simulation team. The convexity ensures unique solutions and well-defined inverse dynamics. Plus, the model is flexible, providing multiple parameters which are tuned to approximate a wide range of contact phenomena.

Further, the DeepMind team said that their platform is based on real physics and takes no shortcuts. According to them, many simulations were initially designed for purposes like gaming and cinema; they sometimes take shortcuts that prioritise stability over accuracy. For example, they may ignore gyroscopic forces or directly modify velocities.

That, in the context of optimisation, can be particularly harmful. In contrast, MuJoCo is a second-order continuous-time simulator, implementing the full equations of motion. In other words, MuJoCo closely adheres to the equations that govern our world non-trivial physical phenomena like Newtons Cradle, and unintuitive ones like the Dzhanibekov effect, happens naturally.

The team also said that the MuJoCo core engine is written in pure C, making it easily portable to various architectures. In addition to this, the platform also provides fast and convenient computations of commonly used quantities, like kinematic Jacobians and inertia matrices.

MuJoCo offers powerful scene descriptions. It uses cascading defaults avoiding multiple repeated values and contains elements for real-world robotic components like tendons, actuators, equality constraints, motion-capture markers, and sensors. Soon, it plans to include standardising MJCF as an open format to extend its usefulness beyond the MuJoCo ecosystem.

Besides this, MuJoCo includes two powerful features that support musculoskeletal models of humans and animals. It captures the complexity of biological muscles, including activation states and force-length-velocity curves.

DeepMind has been heavily investing in robotics research. Recently, it introduced RGB-Stacking, a new benchmark for vision-based robotic manipulation.

The recent acquisition comes at a time when there is a dearth of data in robotics research. This is one of the reasons why DeepMinds arch-rival OpenAI went on to shut down its robotics arm indefinitely. But, this is not stopping DeepMind, as its teams are trying to get around this paucity of data with a technique called sim-to-real, in a big way.

Now, with the acquisition of MuJoCo, open-sourcing the library seems like a smooth move for the company, and surely going to benefit the robotics ecosystem as a whole.

See the rest here:
Why DeepMind Acquired This Robotics Startup - Analytics India Magazine

Read More..