The cost of cloud computing is, to be sure, very much of a pay    you go model. You pay per use and you pay for everything.    Cloud providers like Amazon, Microsoft, IBM and Google have    spent billions to build out massive data centers the size of    football stadiums and they arent giving that away on the    cheap.  
    Its remarkable how many people forget this, or dont think    about the cost. Surveys have found many companies leave the    cloud after getting a massive bill because they failed to    accurately predict usage fees.  
    The major providers are all offering "pay as you go" access to    virtual machines running on Linux and Windows, so the basic    features arent that different from one provider to the next.    And their fees are comparable. Its the other intangibles that    can make your decision for you.  
      As companies make greater use of the      cloud, they face pressure to optimize the costs.          
 Main Cloud Costs      
      For the purposes of this article, we will approach this      from the perspective of purchasing      Infrastructure-as-a-Service level services, since that is the      starting point for a complete package of services. Anything      below that and you are either at SaaS, where you are using an      application, or a basic service like DropBox for simple      storage.    
      
    
      For most customers, running IaaS involves taking      on-premises apps and moving them to the cloud for any of a      variety of reasons, be it scale, flexibility, or to reduce      costs. Because of this, the main costs for an IaaS      subscription are compute and bandwidth. Compute costs will      consume 60% or more of your total subscription. The next      largest portion, bandwidth, can be as high as 20% depending      on how much data you are moving between your on-premises      systems and your cloud provider.    
      
    
      In both cases, there will eventually come a point where      its no longer economical to operate in the cloud because the      monthly costs exceed what you would pay to run it      on-premises. In fact, Gartner says cost reduction should not      be your motivation.    
      
    
      We never advise customers to move to the cloud to save      costs, said Sid Nag, research vice president in the      technology and service providers division of Gartner. You      dont flip a switch and move to the cloud. You have to      maintain old app on premises and are always running in a      bimodal mode. Maybe four or five years later you start to see      cost savings. In the first six months, absolutely      not.    
      
    
      Then theres a hidden cost most firms dont realize      before moving to the cloud. Often, you cant take an      on-premises app and move it to AWS and expect it to run      unchanged. At best, it wont operate the same. Or, your app      simply doesnt take advantage of the characteristics of the      cloud.    
      
    
      Rewriting apps is a cost people overlook, said Nag.      If you really want to take advantage of true cloud      characteristics, you will end up writing an app that looks      nothing like the app on-prem. It does the same thing but      looks completely different. That costs.    
      
    
      After compute and bandwidth, support can add up      quickly, as can storage. Cloud providers allow customers to      choose between flash and traditional disk storage, and the      flash storage costs twice as much. Another cost that can      spiral out of control is memory. Memory tends to be priced at      a rate of 1:1, meaning if you double the amount of memory you      allocate for your VMs, you will pay twice as much.    
      
    
      There are also a number of costs unrelated to the      actual cost of using the service. They are:    
      
    
-   Over-provisioning: You      allocate too much compute, memory and storage and pay for      something you dont use..      
-   Under-provisioning: The      opposite problem, where you dont have enough resources and      either have to buy more or spend more to get the work      done.. 
-   Fire and forget:      Spinning up a bunch of virtual machines and then forgetting      to shut them down when you are done. If they keep running,      the meter keeps ticking..      
-   Bad storage choices: You      might get too much or too little or use the wrong kind of      storage, since there are many to choose from..      
-   Non-cloud services:      virtual hardware, like load balancers and VPNs, are often      pushed on customers who think they need them and add up      quickly.    
-   Exit fees: Say you pick      a provider and decide you dont like them and decide to move      to another provider. You might get hit with a big fee to      retrieve your data. Check for this in the fine print before      signing on with a host..      
-   Support costs: Tracking      down support issues can be complicated and your provider is      going to charge you a hefty fee for it.      
      
    
    As companies make greater use of the cloud, they face    pressure to optimize the costs.  
    For the purposes of this article, we will approach this from    the perspective of purchasing Infrastructure-as-a-Service level    services, since that is the starting point for a complete    package of services. Anything below that and you are either at    SaaS, where you are using an application, or a basic service    like DropBox for simple storage.  
    For most customers, running IaaS involves taking on-premises    apps and moving them to the cloud for any of a variety of    reasons, be it scale, flexibility, or to reduce costs. Because    of this, the main costs for an IaaS subscription are compute    and bandwidth. Compute costs will consume 60% or more of your    total subscription. The next largest portion, bandwidth, can be    as high as 20% depending on how much data you are moving    between your on-premises systems and your cloud provider.  
    In both cases, there will eventually come a point where its no    longer economical to operate in the cloud because the monthly    costs exceed what you would pay to run it on-premises. In fact,    Gartner says cost reduction should not be your motivation.  
    We never advise customers to move to the cloud to save costs,    said Sid Nag, research vice president in the technology and    service providers division of Gartner. You dont flip a switch    and move to the cloud. You have to maintain old app on premises    and are always running in a bimodal mode. Maybe four or five    years later you start to see cost savings. In the first six    months, absolutely not.  
    Then theres a hidden cost most firms dont realize before    moving to the cloud. Often, you cant take an on-premises app    and move it to AWS and expect it to run unchanged. At best, it    wont operate the same. Or, your app simply doesnt take    advantage of the characteristics of the cloud.  
    Rewriting apps is a cost people overlook, said Nag. If you    really want to take advantage of true cloud characteristics,    you will end up writing an app that looks nothing like the app    on-prem. It does the same thing but looks completely different.    That costs.  
    After compute and bandwidth, support can add up quickly, as can    storage. Cloud providers allow customers to choose between    flash and traditional disk storage, and the flash storage costs    twice as much. Another cost that can spiral out of control is    memory. Memory tends to be priced at a rate of 1:1, meaning if    you double the amount of memory you allocate for your VMs, you    will pay twice as much.  
    There are also a number of costs unrelated to the actual cost    of using the service. They are:  
    In this early era of cloud computing, many costs are higher    than they need to be.  
    There are almost two dozen enterprise cloud services providers    of note, so time does not permit going into a complete    comparison of everyone. What we did was compare the top four     Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and IBM  along with two small    players that may not necessarily on the radar of most companies    but are extremely price competitive.  
    To start, we looked at the size of a Linux-based virtual    machine in cores and memory. They range in size from small to    double extra large and break down this way:  
    The price difference between the small players and big players,    however, is astounding.  
    Hourly Cost  
    Is Internap the first cloud services provider that comes to    mind? Or the second? But its clearly the leader in price. The    provider 1&1, which primarily sells hosting and domains, is    also extremely price competitive if your needs fit their    system. Thats why it pays to shop around.  
    Next we look at Block Storage, a common form of cloud data    storage. The prices vary widely, but also so do the services.    Some providers offer much greater guarantee of performance, but    it comes at a cost.  
    There are many other price metrics, some easier to compare than    others because the providers either do or do not providing    pricing information on their Web sites. Data transfer rates,    for instance, can be difficult to find for all the different    providers because some providers dont list them.  
    What these charts show is pricing can vary greatly, and the    biggest providers arent necessarily the cheapest. So when    researching cloud costs, it really pays to shop around and cast    a wide net.  
Read more here:
Cloud Computing Costs Datamation - Datamation - Datamation
Read More..