Page 4,455«..1020..4,4544,4554,4564,457..4,4604,470..»

AMD’s 32-core, Zen-based Naples chip aims to break Intel’s server dominance – PCWorld

The outspoken Forrest Norrod has never shied away from challenges. Previously, as a server chief at Dell, he helped the company's data-center hardware business flourish, and he loved experimenting with new types of servers.

He has a new challenge as AMD's server chief: to bring back the glory days of chipmaker's server business, which is now in tatters. A mega-chip called Naples, which has 32 cores and is based on the Zen architecture, will be the first test of AMD's return to the server market.

The Naples chip will ship to server makers in the second quarter of this year. The benchmarks of Naples are competitive with Intel's chips in head-to-head comparisons, said Norrod, senior vice president and general manager of AMD's Enterprise, Embedded, and Semi-Custom Business Group.

AMD's return will add much-needed competition to the server chip market, which Intel dominates. Intel has more than a 90 percent market share, and AMD's goal is to steadily siphon off customers.

Customers may welcome AMD's server chips because Intel's chips are priced high, with the most expensive chip selling for $8,898. Lower priced AMD chips could give customers bargaining power.

"If we look at how they price their consumer products, it stands to reason that the versions of Naples will also undercut Intel's pricing," said Nathan Brookwood, principal analyst at Insight 64.

An AMD discount is already happening with the company's new Ryzen desktop chips, which are significantly cheaper than Intel's gaming chips.

The Naples server chipsare based on the x86 architecture, but they don't have an official name yet. AMD was once a legitimate threat to Intel, but a series of missteps killed its server business. The decline started with the heavily criticized Bulldozer architecture, and the company later bet its server future on ARM chips, but slow demand knocked the company out of servers.

Naples won't be the only server chip based on Zen. More chips will be revealed as the server chip launch comes closer, Norrod said. Not everyone will buy a 32-core chip, so AMD may release server chips with fewer cores.

The response to Zen has so far been "delightful," Norrod said.

Zen server chips are targeted at single- and two-socket servers, which are used for general-purpose and cloud applications. A two-socket system could have eight memory channels, which could help with in-memory applications like databases, which require more bandwidth.

Naples will have more I/O and memory capacity than comparable Intel chips, Narrod said. Those features should help with machine learning, especially when the chip is paired with co-processors like GPUs. AMD hopes to pair Zen server chips with its upcoming Vega GPU, which will be tuned for machine learning.

The high-bandwidth fabric linking two sockets in the chips is unique, which makes them ideal for two-socket servers, Brookwood said.

AMD has already licensed its new server architecture to THATIC (Tianjin Haiguang Advanced Technology Investment Co. Ltd.), a joint venture in China that is making surrogate Zen chips for the local market. That doesn't mean AMD will hold its Naples chips from the China market, Norrod said.

The Naples chip will take on Intel's Skylake server chips, which are scheduled to be used by Google in its cloud servers. One area where the AMD chips will fall short is in high-performance applications, where Intel chips could excel. Intel's Skylake server chips will have AVX-512 to run vectorized applications, while AMD's chips have only AVX-128.

There are some algorithms that can benefit from AVX-512, and Intel has been in the high-performance computing area longer than AMD, Brookwood said.

"Intel knows where those codes are buried," while AMD is still trying to discover the market, Brookwood said.

There are some applications that will run better on Intel's chips, Norrod said. But AMD's Naples has its own unique features that could help the company come firing back into the server market, he said.

In the end, if AMD's chip is competitive on performance, even if slightly slower, customers will consider using it.

"If you have comparable performance, then pricing's a big deal," Brookwood said.

More here:
AMD's 32-core, Zen-based Naples chip aims to break Intel's server dominance - PCWorld

Read More..

Securing applications in the public cloud – Computerworld

I have written on the topic of cloud-induced transformation of IT in the past. Adapting IT audit and monitoring processes to cloud infrastructure is one of the challenges I come across when it comes to cloud rollouts.

In a 1990s-era data center, everything revolves around hardware and virtual machines. Big, monolithic applications are installed and run on servers. Servers themselves run in the private subnet (secure) or public (DMZ), and they have various security agent software installed to monitor and log everything that goes in and out of these machines.

It is easy to think of public cloud (such as AWS) as a managed hosting service or collocation. However, this is only a fraction of the services public clouds offer. Among services provided by large public cloud providers like AWS or Azure, there is storage, queuing, machine learning, container hosting, database engines and much more.

There are other application platform services out there in the public cloud. Consider the REST API services offered by Microsoft Office 365, Salesforce, Google and LinkedIn: None of them involve any virtual servers at all.

The services that do create virtual server instances do so in an entirely automated fashion. Consider AWS RDS, for example, which under the covers spins up virtual servers that run the DBMS software. Likewise, the AWS Elastic Container Service, Elastic MapReduce and Kenesis create fully managed EC2 instances. It would defeat the purpose of using the public cloud to try and manage these servers on your own.

A correctly built cloud-first application server is transient. This server scales automatically with the workload, wakes up when needed and goes to sleep when not. Developers don't log on to these servers directly. It does not make sense to monitor these servers in a traditional way.

It is possible to build a modern app without using any backend server component at all. Useful applications can be put together using API mashups, and APIs offered by social media and cloud providers.

These applications require no custom backend code at all. Any backend code that is needed can be built using something like AWS Lambda functions. The APIs and functions execute on servers that IT has very little or no control over.

Each cloud provider provides tools for security monitoring, logging and audits. If a cloud provider does not offer any, then perhaps the choice should be re-examined.

While Azure has similar tools and procedures, I will focus on AWS, since it is the one I am most familiar with. IT teams should review the AWS security audit guide.

At the infrastructure level, consider AWS Elastic Load Balancer log collection. Operations teams can collect and analyze network traffic using VPC flow logs.

There are a few more options for additional security. Most importantly, any additional tiers that implement security must meet or exceed application availability and scalability requirements. Before configuring any custom in-line gateway or forward proxy, I would still recommend first exhausting native AWS resources.

Before NAT Gateways became available, AWS recommended configuring a NAT instance. NAT instances required additional administrative and DevOps effort. When NAT Gateways as a service became available, it was an instant hit with DevOps teams. Unlike a NAT EC2 instance, the AWS Gateway service offers better availability and more bandwidth -- and it works well for most use cases. Likewise, AWS should offer a managed forward proxy as a service.

The real challenge, however, is ensuring that the EC2 instances in the private subnet can only talk to approved external services -- and that includes AWS APIs such as Dynamo, Kinesis, S3 and SQS. The purpose of VPC endpoints is to allow applications to communicate with AWS services without going through the public internet.

Unfortunately, AWS only offers an S3 endpoint. That severely limits AWS services that can be used from the private subnet without having to jump through hoops. Creating VPC endpoints for all AWS services should be at the top of the list for AWS.

This article is published as part of the IDG Contributor Network. Want to Join?

Read the original:
Securing applications in the public cloud - Computerworld

Read More..

Deploy Dedicated Servers Instantly with ServerMania Instant Bare … – PR Web (press release)

Clients had to choose between optimum power and immediate availability with Instant Bare-Metal they can have both.

Toronto, ON (PRWEB) March 08, 2017

ServerMania, a leading provider of cloud and dedicated server hosting, has announced the introduction of Instant Bare-Metal, enterprise-grade bare metal servers that can be deployed in seconds.

Instant Bare-Metal combine the instant availability of cloud servers with the raw performance of bare metal. Instant Bare-Metal can be deployed immediately, and are the perfect option for infrastructure hosting clients who need immediate access to the most powerful servers.

ServerMania has selected its most popular dedicated server plans and made them available at the click of a button. The servers are ready and waiting in their racks, and with minimal configuration, can be lit up and made available to clients.

For workloads that demand optimal processing power, IO, and memory allocation, you cant beat a dedicated server, explained ServerMania CEO, Kevin Blanchard, But dedicated servers usually take time to configure and deploy. Clients had to choose between optimum power and immediate availability with Instant Bare-Metal they can have both.

Instant Bare-Metal are a perfect fit for a wide range of use cases. Software-as-a-Service businesses with I/O intensive operations depend on the ability to scale quickly. With Instant Bare-Metal, they can immediately deploy dedicated servers capable of supporting the most demanding workloads. Other scenarios that are a perfect fit for Instant Bare-Metal include the fintech sector, where immediate access to high-performance computing infrastructure is essential; and real-time big data analytics workloads, which benefit from access to the fastest I/O and uncompromised processing power.

ServerMania offers a comprehensive range of bare metal and cloud hosting options, including dedicated servers, public and private cloud hosting, and colocation.

###

About ServerMania: Since it was founded in 2002, ServerMania has always strived to provide its clients with enterprise-level service at an unbeatable cost. ServerMania offers a wide range of fully customizable dedicated, hybrid, cloud, VPS and colocation hosting services. All ServerMania clients enjoy a 100% uptime SLA and are assisted by a 24/7 rapid response team one with some of the best response times in the industry. ServerMania also carries out regular surveys to ensure complete customer satisfaction and care. For more information, visit http://www.servermania.com.

Share article on social media or email:

Follow this link:
Deploy Dedicated Servers Instantly with ServerMania Instant Bare ... - PR Web (press release)

Read More..

Watch Google Cloud Next developer conference live right here – TechCrunch

Watch Google Cloud Next developer conference live right here
TechCrunch
If you can't stop dreaming about NoSQL databases, Google's Cloud Next conference is the closest thing to heaven that you'll find today. At 9 AM PT/12 PM ET/5 PM GMT, some of the brightest minds in cloud computing are going to introduce the upcoming ...

and more »

View post:
Watch Google Cloud Next developer conference live right here - TechCrunch

Read More..

The case against calling it a bitcoin bubble – Quartz

The worlds most famous cryptocurrency is trading at record highs, but is it a bubble?

Looking at a chart of bitcoins price as it climbed and eventually overtook its long-held, previous all-time high, set in the final months of 2013, its easy to see why some people think its a bubble in danger of popping.

But Vikram Mansharamani, who wrote a book about identifying bubbles, says the bitcoin market exhibits fewer than two of the five major features of a fully inflated bubble. He lays out his argument in a LinkedIn post, which Ive summarized in the scorecard below.

Another blogger has weighed in with his own interpretation of the market using Mansharamanis framework and concludes that trade in the cryptocurrency is a tad frothier. Whereas Mansharamani gives bitcoin half mark for reflexivitythe idea that an assets rising price increases demand for it, which investors like George Soros subscribe toSG Kinsmanns analysis gives bitcoin a full point for reflexivity. The argument for doing so? Transaction volumes and fees, which indicate demand, have risen along with the price.

Still, that puts bitcoin at just two out of five marks for bubble indicators.

Bubble or not, bitcoin investors are in for some price action this week. The US Securities and Exchange Commission only has five more days before it must issue a decision on a bitcoin exchange-traded fund, which could really open the floodgates of demand for bitcoinor bring the price crashing back down.

Visit link:
The case against calling it a bitcoin bubble - Quartz

Read More..

Bitcoin Price Target For 2017 – Seeking Alpha

Bitcoin (OTCQX:GBTC) is a totally different investment asset type than traditional asset classes. Traditional analysis methods do not applying when forecasting the price of bitcoin. That's why we apply a more fundamental approach in this article in order to come up with a bitcoin price forecast for 2017.

How NOT to forecast a bitcoin price

Most readers would turn to the cryptocurrency blogosphere where they will read ultra-bullish bitcoin price forecasts for 2017 similar to this one from Coindesk. The issue with this approach is that those sites only feature bitcoin enthusiasts and entrepreneurs, so they offer a very biased view.

Traditional financial media, on the other hand, have their classic story telling format. That is not a useful approach either for investors. For instance, CNBC looked at the ongoing stream of articles that compare bitcoin with gold (NYSEARCA:GLD), and concluded that "the comparison is perhaps a positive signal that bitcoin is being commoditized. But bitcoin is not a commodity, while gold has been a commodity for thousands of years." That obviously does not tell anything about the future price of bitcoin.

Fortune.com explained how demand for safe haven assets have fallen since the elections "on a stronger dollar, signs of future interest rate hikes, and potentially business-friendly policies that may arise from the Trump administration. Those potential regulatory changes would raise the chances of higher-yielding stocks." That also is not useful as input for a bitcoin price forecast.

The most interesting headline comes from CNBC: "Bitcoin predicted to rise 165% to $2,000 in 2017 driven by Trump's spending binge and dollar rally."

There is obviously no correlation between the bitcoin price and the dollar or any other regular asset. Large investors simply don't pull money out of currencies, stocks (NYSEARCA:SPY) or gold in order to buy bitcoins.

A legitimate bitcoin forecast for 2017

We believe that a combination of price analysis and fundamental analysis is the most appropriate way to come up with a legitimate bitcoin forecast.

Fundamentally, the bitcoin usage data look great: Usage of bitcoins keeps on increasing, and that is exactly what it fundamentally is all about. Because of the fact that bitcoin is a form of money, the widening acceptance of bitcoin is the most fundamental data point to consider.

According to Statista, bitcoin usage keeps on growing as seen by the number of Bitcoin ATMs, which increased from 538 in January 2016 to 838 by November. Most Bitcoin ATMs, as of July 2016, were located in the United States (345) and Canada (108). The Bitcoin ATMs located in Europe as of June 2016 constituted 24.02 percent of the global ATM market share.

Moreover, several bitcoin charts confirm a growing usage and acceptance:

Last but not least, this research paper on bitcoin's big picture trends identifies 3 marked regimes that have evolved as the bitcoin economy has grown and matured: From an early prototype stage, to a second growth stage populated in large part with "sin" enterprise (i.e., gambling, black markets), to a third stage marked by a sharp progression away from "sin" and toward legitimate enterprises.

In other words, fundamentally, the picture for bitcoin looks very good. This is not only a market for speculators anymore, but one of real users.

We are confident, based on the objective data set outlined above that bitcoin's price rise is not only legitimate, but will continue. That results in a bullish bitcoin price forecast for 2017 and beyond.

From a bitcoin price analysis point of view, the long-term chart (courtesy: Finviz) looks very constructive. Readers should compare the steep rally in 2013 with the steady and solid rise in the last 2 years. As the price of bitcoin took out all-time highs, it suggests it has much more upside potential.

The only 'negative' is that the price rise has accelerated in recent weeks. Investors want to see a steady rise, not a parabolic rise. So we hope there will be a healthy correction sooner rather than later to cool off emotions. Ideally, bitcoin's price corrects to the $1,000 to $1,100 area in the coming weeks.

We could easily see bitcoin's price move to $2,000 in 2017.

This bitcoin price forecast for 2017 originally appeared on InvestingHaven.com

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Follow this link:
Bitcoin Price Target For 2017 - Seeking Alpha

Read More..

We Love Bitcoin, But Stop Comparing It To Gold – Seeking Alpha

By Parke Shall

Those that read us know that we have been Bitcoin bulls for quite some time. With the price of 1BTC now approaching $1300, the question of whether or not we are staying in or cashing out has come up several times.

We wanted to write today to inform readers that not only are we staying long bitcoin, but we will, as we have been saying in the past, continue to add small amounts on any dips. We had a short term bitcoin price target of new all-time highs for this year that we reiterated in a previous article out in December 2016. In December of 2016, with bitcoin at $800, we stated that "Bitcoin Would Soar Through $1200 in 2017".

Now, it is time for us to focus on our multiple year long-term outlook for bitcoin. We don't believe that $5000 or even $10,000 is out of the question eventually, though it may take many years for the digital currency to reach that point. Needless to say, we remain bullish.

We know that bitcoin is becoming more and more of a news item over the last couple of weeks, as its price has run up significantly to now over $1200 per BTC. Anytime there's a price movement in any type of security like this, it makes the news. Many times, when penny stocks or other lesser-known securities rise in value, the media covers them without adequate understanding of what they are and how they work. Bitcoin is no different.

It has been getting more and more media coverage this past week yet the media, for some reason, continues to want to compare the price of one BTC to 1 ounce of gold. Yes, it is true that bitcoin has passed 1 ounce of gold in value. What does this mean? Absolutely nothing.

As bitcoin bulls, we would love to sit here and give you some convoluted meaningless answer as to why the price of one bitcoin passing 1 ounce of gold is meaningful, but there is really no common denominator basis of comparison between the two. You can put gold and silver on a ratio because you can reduce both metals to weight. You can't put bitcoin on a ratio with gold because one is a physical item with weight and a somewhat unknown but relatively finite supply and the other is a digital product that exists only online or in cyberspace.

So if you are a member of the financial media and are reading this, stop comparing the price of gold with the price of bitcoin.

Moving on, we could spend many paragraphs and many pages defending bitcoin as a storer of value. We could also, as generally Austrian thinking economists, make the argument that it has no value because it doesn't really exist. We think the answer for the short term is going to be somewhere in between. It exists because people are buying into it (not unlike Federal Reserve notes). It is a storer of value because it is limited in its supply. We have maintained in many of our articles that the major risk to bitcoin is the fact that it exists on an infrastructure that must be in place in order for it to be transacted. Whereas one person can go and hand gold to another person if the entire infrastructure of the world is brought down, bitcoin doesn't exist without our smartphones, our computers, and the Internet.

With this all said, we have written many articles over the last year talking about why would be buying the dip in bitcoin at various circumstances. After the Bitfinex crash, we came out and said that we would be buyers and after that, we wrote that we thought the digital currency was going to easily eclipse $1000 and then move through new highs. So far we have been right on.

Now let's talk about our outlook for the future. Despite bitcoin being incorrectly compared with gold, it continues to come up as both a hedge and a storer of value. Well you can take dispute with either of these, it is quite obvious that the public believes both of these to be appropriate. We do as well. Like any other financial asset that is in demand, it doesn't really matter what the ultimate product is, it only matters what the demand for said product is.

With the big banks and even the central banks working on different ways to incorporate the Blockchain into their business, it is obvious there has been buy-in on a major scale for a bitcoin. Many have argued that other digital currency's may come and take the place of bit coin and we actually believe just the opposite. We believe that because bitcoin was the original digital currency that it is going to have the most staying power and legacy status for many years to come. Other digital currencies may gain value on the fact that bitcoin has value, but there's only going to be one bitcoin at the end of the day.

In a world that is increasingly switching to digital, it is going to be tougher and tougher to make a case against bitcoin as long as large banks and governments continue to buy into the technology. There is no doubt that the blockchain technology is going to be the next step for a number of corporations and potentially a number of governments.

Investors need to realize that 100% of capital is at risk when they are dealing in such a speculative asset with very little track record behind it. With that said, we believe the bitcoin is going to remain in demand, become further accessible to retail spiking demand, and will have its credibility continue to improve going forward. While there are a varying group of long term estimated price ranges for bitcoin between $0 dollars and $1 million per bitcoin, depending on how seriously it is taken as a hedge against the financial system, we certainly don't think that the digital currency is going to stop growing in value anytime soon.

Over the course of its lifetime, we believe bitcoin is still in its extreme infancy and we would not be surprised to see the price eclipse $2000 by the end of the year this year. Further, our long-term targets for BTC remain between $2000 and $5000 for the next year or two. At this point, we may see corrections and we may see some stagnation but ultimately the most important point is that in the finite amount of supply and growing demand are going to continue to push prices much higher in the future. We remain long bitcoin.

Disclosure: I am/we are long BITCOIN.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Read more:
We Love Bitcoin, But Stop Comparing It To Gold - Seeking Alpha

Read More..

Chinese banks experiment with bitcoin-like system – MarketWatch

Chinese banks in two cities are testing a custom-built digital currency developed by the Peoples Bank of China, according to information gleaned from local media reports and interviews with two individuals who are familiar with the central banks thinking.

The digital currency, known to the broader world as ChinaCoin, but officially referred to inside China as digital renminbi, or RMB, was developed by the PBOC in partnership with other private and public entities.

Eventually, Chinese authorities hope digital RMB will help the government strengthen oversight of the countrys banks, while helping to prevent financial crime.

The reason theyre doing this is because they want to have more transparency to regulate how money flows between banks, said Patrick Dai, founder of the Qtum foundation, creators of the Qtum blockchain project.

In recent months, certain local banks based in Shenzhen, a financial hub in southern China, and Guiyang, the capital of a province in the countrys southwest, have begun experimenting with first using the digital RMB network for settlement and clearing of transactions in the countrys interbank bond market.

Chinas national media frequently cites transparency and efficiency as among the potential benefits of the digital renminbi project. However, in an interview with Caixin, a Chinese business publication, Peoples Bank of China Gov. Zhou Xiaochuan said it would take China approximately 10 years to fully embrace the digital renminbi. Chinas currency USDCNY, +0.0101% is interchangeably referred to as yuan and renminbi.

But once it is widely launched, digital RMB will be more convenient, protect citizens privacy and maintain social order, Zhou said. Eventually, the digital adoption will allow the central bank to make better-informed decisions about monetary policy by allowing it to more closely monitor the movement of capital through the Chinese economy, he said, adding the system could also make it easier to prevent financial crimes such as money laundering.

Zhou also emphasized key differences between digital RMB and bitcoin, arguably the best known cryptocurrency. While the digital renminbi will incorporate some elements of blockchain technology, like the cryptographic algorithms that help secure the bitcoin network, it will more closely resemble a permissioned blockchain a type of closed system that limits who can access and change information.

Read: This bitcoin rival nearly doubled in value in one week

The Chinese system will also be centrally controlled by the government, a concept that contravenes what bitcoin enthusiasts consider to be the cryptocurrencys most revolutionary innovation: the ability to maintain a monetary system that is resistant to centralized control.

The elephant in the room is how much it could potentially increase [the PBOCs] control, said Chris Burniske, Blockchain analyst and products lead at ARK Invest.

The price of a single bitcoin US:BTCUSD was at $1,280 in recent trade, just shy of an all-time high reached late last week. Part of the rise has been attributed to anticipation of the Securities and Exchange Commissions decision on approval of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, which is expected by the end of the week.

The PBOC isnt the only central bank thats exploring the feasibility of its own digital currency. The Bank of England joined with researchers at University College in London to create RSCoin, a digital currency for central banks. The Bank of Canada has also said it is developing a blockchain-based digital version of the Canadian dollar.

View post:
Chinese banks experiment with bitcoin-like system - MarketWatch

Read More..

The Cryptocurrency Funds Have Arrived, And They’re Bringing Wall Street Money – Seeking Alpha

If 2013-2016 was the era of venture investment in bitcoin and blockchain startups - VCs put north of a billion dollars to work, peaking at $290M in the first half of 2016 - then 2017-2020 will in hindsight be seen as the Wall Street era. The startup equity investors have come and - in the absence of unicorn valuations or breathtaking growth - they're starting to move on. But now the bitcoin and cryptocurrency funds have arrived, and they've brought public markets investors with them.

Just about every week I'll discover a new investment fund that gives investors liquid exposure to the cryptocurrency asset class. At latest count, there are at least 5 exchange-listed bitcoin investment products, 3 U.S.-based ETFs under review by the SEC, and hedge funds that cover just about every cryptocurrency asset type and investment strategy. By my estimate, these funds represent roughly 5-10% of the $24B in total that's now invested in cryptocurrencies.

For clarity, I define a cryptocurrency fund as a pool of professionally managed capital, available to outside investors, where the majority of AUM are invested in publicly tradable cryptocurrency assets. Examples of such assets include bitcoin, ethereum, and the 500+ altcoins and 50+ digital tokens listed on Coinmarketcap. Thus venture capital funds who invest in shareholder equity of blockchain startups don't qualify.

I've sorted the different funds into three broad categories and wanted to give a description of each category along with some prominent examples. They are:

Disclaimer: Please consider this information as strictly educational and not meant to represent specific investment advice or recommendations.

1. Publicly traded funds

These funds follow a buy-and-hold strategy and usually focus on a single asset. For now, all of them are bitcoin-only, although I expect publicly traded ethereum funds to come online perhaps as early as this year.

A management fee is charged for the service, which ranges from 1.5-2.5% per year. As more funds enter the space, fees will likely decrease, perhaps to below 1% which is what most vanilla ETFs charge. You may wonder why anyone would invest in a public bitcoin fund when you can just buy bitcoin and hold it yourself, but you could ask the same of gold. The biggest gold ETF - the SPDR Gold Trust - manages $35 billion USD. That's double the bitcoin market cap - all in one ETF. The attractions for investors are varied, from ease of access to peace of mind to lighter regulatory regimes. The consistent price premium of Grayscale's Bitcoin Investment Trust (OTCQX:GBTC) shares over the NAV of its bitcoin holdings is more evidence that such vehicles are desired.

Within the cryptocurrency universe, there are roughly two types of such funds: ETFs and ETNs (what are also called asset backed notes). The main difference is that an ETF's value is collateralized by an equivalent value of its underlying benchmark asset and allows an investor to redeem their ETF shares for the asset.

An ETN doesn't allow redemption and doesn't make the same guarantees about how much e.g. bitcoin it actually holds. An ETN is better thought of as unsecured debt that roughly tracks the price of its benchmark asset but has looser reporting and compliance requirements. Because of these differences, ETNs are a bigger credit risk, and we've already seen this risk manifest when KNC Miner filed for bankruptcy. KNC Miner was the guarantor of the COINXBT and COINXBE ETNs on the Nasdaq Nordic, and the bankruptcy filing forced trading to a halt. Two weeks later, the investment firm Global Advisors stepped in and became the new guarantor and trading was allowed to resume.

Examples of bitcoin ETNs include BTCETI (which is co-listed on the Gibraltar Stock Exchange and the Deutsche Borse) and the above-mentioned Global Advisors' COINXBT and COINXBE.

Thus far no bitcoin ETFs have been approved. There are three U.S.-based funds under review by the SEC. They are, in order of their filing:

GBTC is a hybrid, in that it's currently an ETN which is filing to become an ETF. While it has filed for a $500M IPO on NYSE Arca to become an ETF, it is currently traded on the U.S. OTC exchanges and doesn't allow redemption of shares into bitcoin.

The only ETFs with bitcoin exposure are Ark Investment Management's ARK Innovation ETF (NYSEARCA:ARKK) and ARK Web x.0 ETF (ARKW), but these hardly count as official cryptocurrency ETFs because both hold less than 0.3% of their portfolio in GBTC.

Bitcoin IRA is an interesting outlier in that it's a public bitcoin investment fund, available to any investors who have or want to open an IRA, a type of U.S. retirement savings account. They allow the redemption of bitcoin, but the company is not listed on any publicly traded exchange. You must contact them directly to invest. Bitcoin IRA charge a 15% one-time upfront fee of any money invested.

Finally, while the publicly traded funds are all bitcoin, the ethereum funds are coming. One example is the EtherIndex Ether Trust which filed in July 2016 with the SEC to be listed on the NYSE Arca, but has seen little activity since. Here are my notes on its filing. I have seen some other ethereum-based efforts and I expect at least one will be approved for public trading this year.

2. Private buy-and-hold funds

These differ from public investment funds in that they usually have restrictions either on investment size (e.g., $100K USD and above) or status (e.g., accredited investors only). They're not listed on publicly traded exchanges, without the attendant regulatory requirements and investment disclosures, and you can't use investment software like Bloomberg to obtain quotes and place trades. But otherwise the strategy and product and fees are similar: they offer investors comparatively simple and safe exposure to cryptocurrency and charge an annual fee for the service.

The best known example is probably the Pantera Bitcoin Fund. Pantera Capital is a blockchain investment firm which has multiple funds. One of them specializes in equity investments of blockchain startups. The one relevant for our discussion is a private bitcoin buy-and-hold fund which has over $100M in AUM and charges 0.75% annual management fee and a 1% fee for redemption.

An ethereum example is Grayscale's Ethereum Investment Trust, which has not formally launched but will be a private product that provides qualified investors access to Ethereum Classic.

DLT10 Index is an interesting example of a private buy-and-hold fund which offers a proprietary basket of 10 publicly traded cryptocurrency assets. The index is a mixture of leading cryptocurrencies and digital tokens, with a preference for enduring assets.

3. Hedge funds

Last we have cryptocurrency hedge funds. A hedge fund is a pool of lightly regulated capital that invests in whatever it likes within some broad strategic parameters. They have active trading strategies including e.g., leveraged trading, price arbitrage, and algorithmic trading. In addition to charging a management fee comparable to the above two types of funds, they also charge a performance fee that in this space can range from 15-45%. The performance fee is only paid out when the hedge fund beats an agreed-upon benchmark, such as the price of bitcoin. So if a hedge fund can generate better returns than simply owning bitcoin, they're paid very well for doing so. This benchmark outperformance is called alpha.

Known cryptocurrency hedge funds include:

I believe the above-mentioned funds are all actively seeking outside investment. Coinfund.io is an example of a cryptocurrency hedge fund which is no longer taking outside investors. They focus on digital token investment, what are often called ICOs, and host a knowledgeable and active community chat on Slack.

A final interesting example is the TaaS fund (Token-as-a-Service), which will exist on the Ethereum blockchain and in March will sell up to $100M of their tokens via the ICO process. The fund will keep some proceeds to fund operations and invest the remainder in a proprietary mixture of bitcoin, altcoins, and other digital tokens. Token holders will receive an ongoing percentage of trading profits.

The hedge fund space - of the three categories - is likely to see the most growth and proliferation because of its light regulatory touch, the speed to market, and the chance for fund managers to make outsized profits in a still volatile and developing asset class.

The next 3 years are a window of opportunity for starting and investing in cryptocurrency funds

We've entered a golden era of professionally managed money moving into liquid cryptocurrency assets. The risks that prevented Wall Street investor types from entering the market earlier - lack of liquidity, regulatory uncertainty, China trading centralization, lack of sophisticated financial products - are now reduced enough that those hungry for returns have taken the lead and others are starting to follow.

There's no better time to start a fund or raise one, and there's no better time to take a cryptocurrency position if you manage money, especially when you consider the past price performance of cryptocurrency assets and research that proves bitcoin's lack of correlation with existing asset classes. An approved U.S. bitcoin ETF will only add fuel to the growing fire.

In the coming years, the above-mentioned three funds types will expand and evolve: Hedge funds will grow larger and develop more exotic trading strategies, increasingly blending cryptocurrency with mainstream asset classes like equities and commodities. Private funds will diversify from one cryptocurrency asset to multiple assets and seek listing on exchanges. Finally, publicly traded funds will expand from bitcoin to ethereum and then cryptocurrency indexes, and fees will likely come down as competition grows.

Thanks for reading! A number of people read drafts of this essay and I'm grateful for their feedback. I look forward to your comments and questions.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: I am long bitcoin and altcoins but do not have a personal investment in any of the funds mentioned here.

Continued here:
The Cryptocurrency Funds Have Arrived, And They're Bringing Wall Street Money - Seeking Alpha

Read More..

SwiftStack object storage gets two-way Cloud Sync – TechTarget

SwiftStacks new software upgrade enables two-way data synchronization between its on-premises private cloud storage and the public cloud storage offerings from Google and Amazon.

Every cloud storage option has its pros and cons. Depending on your specific needs, the size of your environment, and your budget, its essential to weigh all cloud and on-prem options. Download this comprehensive guide in which experts analyze and evaluate each cloud storage option available today so you can decide which cloud model public, private, or hybrid is right for you.

By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.

You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

The SwiftStack object storage software 5 release, which became generally available today, enhances the Cloud Sync feature the San Francisco-based software vendor added late last year. Cloud Sync enables customers to set policies to automatically place data across private and public storage for off-site data protection and cloud-based archiving. SwiftStack stores data in the same object format both on premises and in the cloud.

SwiftStack object storage is based on open source OpenStack Swift software and runs on commodity Linux servers. The company sells and supports a commercial version of Swift, and its engineering team adds management services and features such as load balancing, metadata search and Cloud Sync. SwiftStack object storage also includes a file system gateway and the vendor is working on native file access capability.

The SwiftStack Cloud Sync feature formerly supported only one-way replication to a bucket in Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) or Glacier or in the four Google Cloud Storage offerings. The new bi-directional replication capability is designed to ease collaboration with external partners, by synchronizing on-premises data with shared cloud buckets, and facilitate bursting to the cloud for additional resources.

"Before, if people were going to do a lot of compute, they had to more manually replicate data from a SwiftStack cluster to a spot in the public cloud and then replicate the results back," said Mario Blandini, vice president of marketing at SwiftStack. "Now that we have this going both ways, it allows you to use that elastic compute in the public cloud."

Scott Sinclair, a senior analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group, said the new Cloud Sync capabilities would also improve collaboration, by synchronizing data that users and applications modify within the public cloud back to the on-premises storage. He said the new capabilities would help SwiftStack to "transition from an on-premises software-defined infrastructure," with tiering to the cloud, "to more of a hybrid cloud storage layer."

"With this next step and the bi-directional aspects, the cloud infrastructure becomes a partner in the data center ecosystem," Sinclair said. "And if you follow this trend moving forward, theres the potential for [SwiftStack] to start delivering a more capable and more functional hybrid cloud infrastructure."

Steven Hill, a senior storage analyst at 451 Research, said the value of Cloud Sync replication was illustrated by the three-hour outage that Amazon S3 storage services experienced on February 28 "and the resulting chaos for websites and customers who depended solely on the S3 East Zone out of Virginia."

Hill said a website using SwiftStack object storage with Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage could have simply pointed to on-premises storage or the Google Cloud Storage when Amazon S3 became unavailable. That would, however, require customers to pay to store the same data in two clouds.

"The storage would have existed at more than one location. The challenge is keeping all those different resources in synchronization," said Hill, noting that thats what SwiftStacks Cloud Sync does.

SwiftStack object storage does not support direct bi-directional replication between two public clouds. Blandini said a future SwiftStack release would support synchronization from one public cloud to another public cloud for new "multi-cloud" use cases.

"Our vision has always been that we would [provide] data management for data that resides on prem or in 'n' number of public clouds," Blandini said.

Another upcoming feature Blandini mentioned is "policy balancing" to enable the system to put more data in one cloud versus another cloud if, for example, the cloud storage service prices were to change. The customer might have one or more copies of the data on premises and another copy in Google or Amazon, or distributed between the two public cloud services. SwiftStack plans to add policy balancing in the next four to six weeks, according to Blandini.

In the meantime, other new capabilities in SwiftStack 5 include multi-region erasure coding for data protection and support for deep buckets with more than 100 million objects from the OpenStack software distribution. SwiftStack is also making available a new desktop client for the Windows and Apple OS X operating systems.

Laura DuBois, group vice president for IDC's enterprise storage, server and system infrastructure software research, claims multi-region erasure coding is a "must-have" for any object-based storage.

DuBois said SwiftStack's main challenge is "go to market" against the major vendors of object-based storage such as Dell EMC, Hitachi Data Systems, IBM and NetApp.

"What sets [SwiftStack] apart is the file/object gateway, flexible deployment and OpenStack integration," DuBois wrote in an email. She estimated that about 10% of SwiftStack's customers use OpenStack, and many hail from the media and entertainment and life sciences industries.

Swift or Ceph: Which is the best choice?

OpenStack Newton release includes encryption

SwiftStack and Ciscoteam up for object storage

More here:
SwiftStack object storage gets two-way Cloud Sync - TechTarget

Read More..