Viewpoint by Marshall Auerback and Jan Ritch-Frel
Marshall Auerback is a market analyst and commentator and Jan Ritch-Frel the executive director of the Independent Media Institute. This article was produced by Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.
NEW YORK (IDN) Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers has recently conceded: "In general, economic thinking has privileged efficiency over resilience, and it has been insufficiently concerned with the big downsides of efficiency." Policy across the globe is therefore moving in a more overtly nationalistic direction to rectify this shortcoming.
COVID-19 has accelerated a process that was well underway before it, spreading beyond U.S.-China-EU trade negotiations and into the world's 50 largest economies. As much as many defenders of the old order lament this trend, it is as significant a shift as the dawn of the World Trade Organization (WTO) global trade era.
Economists, politicians, and leading pundits are often tempted to see new economic patterns through the prisms of the past; we are therefore likely to hear that we're back in an era of 19th-century mercantilism, or 1970s-style stagflation. But that misses the momentthe motives are different, and so are the outcomes.
What we are experiencing is the realization by state planners of developed countries that new technologies enable a rapid ability to expand or initiate new and profitable production capacity closer to or inside their own markets. The cost savings in transport, packaging and security and benefits to regional neighbors and these countries' domestic workforces will increasingly compete with the price of goods produced through the current internationalized trade system. U.S. national politicians from President Trump to Senator Elizabeth Warren will be joined by a growing chorus who see the long-term domestic political benefit of supporting this transition.
The combination of high-speed communication, advances in automated manufacturing and computing combined with widespread access to the blueprints and information necessary to kick-start new production capacity increasingly makes the current international network of supply chains resemble a Rube Goldberg contraption, and it lightens the currency outflow challenge that many economies have had to deal with for the past seven decades.
Growing political will to restore manufacturing capacity in the national interest will have a shattering effect on countries that built up their economies through a labor price advantage over the past 40 years. No amount of currency depreciation or product dumping can overcome the reality of a country's foreign customer base suddenly opting to produce and buy their own goods at competitive prices.
Taken in sum, the transformation underway isn't just Donald Trump demanding less dependency on China's production capacityit's a global process. It's also India signaling it's going to try to strike its own technological path away from China.
New Patterns of Production
There's a lot of froth in moments like these, where old patterns continue at the same time new ones emerge. Factories are still closing in the United States on the NAFTA continuumno punishment for leaving and good incentives to leave; in many respects, it's because the corporations are part of the same old regime.
But look at sectors of the more advanced economy, and the green shoots and stalks of a new era are quite visible.
There is a cascade of new production in the United Statesnot the familiar announcements of new data centers, warehousing and logistics centers, but rather the production of high-tech goods and essential restoration of hard infrastructure that one might expect of a more self-reliant economy.
The news website Area Development is as good a radar screen for this process as any. There one can find a running spigot of news items like a new "500,000-square-foot research, development and production center [in Texas] to create electric motors for industries as diverse as electric vehicles, robotics, HVAC, and last-mile micromobility," or a restoration and upgrade of Newport News, Virginia's dockyards.
The rationales provided by governments to escape the strictures of the existing trade arrangements and into the new era are fairly easy: a mix of opportunism and need tied to the exigencies of the moment, such as the current pandemic, and long-term national security, which of course can ultimately amount to any economic activity of scope.
Senator Elizabeth Warren's introduction in July of her sweeping Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Defense and Enhancement Act demonstrates that the U.S. power establishment is beginning to reach a consensus on this issueno longer the sole province of Trump-era nationalist. "To defeat the current COVID-19 crisis and better equip the United States against future pandemics, we must boost our country's manufacturing capacity," Warren said, recasting the consequences of decades of policy to offshore our economic production as an "overreliance on foreign countries."
The government of Japan's newly defined restrictions on foreign investment as reported by the Financial Times of around a dozen sectors including "power generation, military equipment, [computer] software [and technology]" in effect prioritize the claims of domestic manufacturers on national security grounds.
Of course, the Japanese authorities have crafted these restrictions on the vague grounds of "national security," which is likely to take on a substantially different meaning in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. Hence, the country is unlikely to face any serious challenge from other WTO members. And it is through that rather simple justification that we can expect a general reshaping of international trade relations and the array of supply chains.
The government of Australia has likewise outlined new powers to scrutinize new overseas investment, as well as forcing foreign companies to sell their assets if they pose a national security threat. The proposals come in the wake of an intensifying trade war between the governments of Beijing and Canberra, alongside "a dramatic increase in the number of foreign investment bids probed by Australia's spy agency ASIO, over fears that China was spying on sensitive health data," according to news.com.au.
This is happening at the same time that there has been an overhaul of thought with regard to manufacturing, something Australia hasn't typically done much of. The headlines from Australia are beginning to look a lot like the Area Development stories in the United States.
The Canadian government has also announced plans to enhance foreign investment scrutiny "related to public health or critical supply chains during the pandemic, as well as any investment by state-owned companies or by investors with close ties to foreign governments," according to the Globe and Mail.
This attempt to disaggregate beneficial foreign investment flows from those deemed contrary to the national interest used to be a common feature of government policy in the post-World War II period. Canada established the Foreign Investment Review Agency in 1973 as a result of mounting concerns about rising overseas investment, notably the domination of U.S. multinationals, in the Canadian economy. Its provisions were repeatedly downgraded as globalization pressures intensified, but its value is now being reassessed for compatibility with national health policy and resiliency in manufacturing chains. Predictably, pharmaceutical independence is high on the list.
Taiwan, "a net importer of surgical masks before the pandemic, [has] created an onshore mask-manufacturing industry in just a month after registering its first infections in January," reports the Financial Times. "Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen said Taipei would repeat that approach to foster other new industries." And world economists have noted that Taiwan and Vietnam lead the world in growth of global market share in exports, at the expense of larger economies like China.
In Europe, the EU leadership is publicly indicating a policy of subsidy and state investment in companies to prevent Chinese buyouts or "undercutting prices." This was supposed to represent a cross-European effort, but the coronavirus policy response is increasingly driven at the national level. Consequently, it is starting to fracture the EU's single market, which has long been constructed on an intricate network of cross-border supply chains and strict rules preventing state subsidies to national champions.
The French government under President Emmanuel Macron has increasingly invoked the spirit of Charles De Gaulle in lieu of French industrialist Jean Monnet, considered as one of the founding fathers of today's European Union. Corporate France has taken heed: In response to French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire's rallying cry to the nation's supermarkets this past March to "Stock French products," according to France 24, "French supermarket chain Carrefour has already moved to source 95 percent of its fruits and vegetables from within" the country, which by the way is a fundamental logic of any serious environmental agenda. According to Coalition for a Prosperous America, "Le Maire [also] cited pharmaceuticals, the automotive sector, and aerospace as three economic sectors where France needs to reassert sovereignty, i.e., make more products in France.
Going further in a national TV interview, the finance minister said "that it was unacceptable for France to rely on China and South Korea for 80 percent of its electric battery supply, praising a new France-based battery-making facility that would come onstream in 2022. He praised French drugmaker Sanofi for saying recently that it intends to re-localize' some of its production back to France."
President Macron himself has likewise reaffirmed a goal for France to ensure the nation's "health sovereignty" after the coronavirus exposed the reliance of his country on imported medical supplies. According to a recent Reuters report, France's "Agriculture Minister, Didier Guillaume, told political news channel Public Senat that while France could not be self-sufficient in all food products, it would look at being more autonomous in areas such as plant protein."
Even Germany, with a vibrant export sector that has long made it a beneficiary of globalization, has also signaled a move toward greater economic nationalism. In a recent interview with Der Spiegel (cited in Reuters), the country's economy minister, Peter Altmaier, "said he wanted to support pharmaceuticals companies that are dependent for key reagents on imports from Asia to rebuild their production sites in Europe."
In broader terms, part of the government's overall response to the COVID-19 pandemic has featured 400 billion in state guarantees to underwrite the debts of companies affected by the turmoil. A goal of this package is to prevent a "bargain sale of German economic and industrial interests," Altmaier was quoted in MarketWatch.
Economic nationalist considerations are also driving a shift in Britain's negotiating stance in the current Brexit trade negotiations with the EU, with the UK clearly prioritizing national sovereignty over frictionless free trade with its former single-market partners, even if that means a so-called "Hard Brexit."
The EU's single-market rules specifically preclude state aid to specific industries if it undermines the operation of the single market. But the UK's chief negotiating officer, David Frost, has made it clear that the ability to break free from the EU's rulebook was essential to the purpose of Brexit, even if that meant reverting to the less favorable WTO trade relationship that exists for other non-EU countries.
In the words of columnist James Forsyth of the Spectator, EU laws on the single market "[deny] to member states what one cabinet minister refers to as the geostrategic premium' of encouraging domestic production of personal protective equipment. In the single market, the NHS cannot buy solely from British suppliers to try to build up a domestic manufacturing base; it has to accept bids from any company based in the EU."
Economic Nationalism and the New Geopolitics
Over the past 40 years, this kind of overt economic nationalism, especially as it has pertained to domestic manufacturing capabilities, has generally been eschewed by the United States, at least until the ascension of Donald Trump to the White House. In part, this is a product of the fact that as global hegemon, the United States used to be able to dominate global institutions (such as the International Monetary Fund and the WTO) and shape them toward U.S. national interests. But when necessary, national security considerations have intervened.
Sematech, a government-industry consortium, was created in the 1980s to successfully revitalize the American semiconductor industry, after the Pentagon deemed this to be a strategically key industry that should not leave the United States exposed to the vagaries of foreign manufacturers. The Sematech consortium has represented a great success in national industrial planning, as it enabled the United States to re-establish its global dominance in high-end semiconductor production and design.
More recently, national security considerations in the semiconductor industry have again revived in the wake of the Trump administration's growing dispute with Chinese 5G telecommunications equipment maker Huawei. The U.S. Commerce Department has now mandated that all semiconductor chip manufacturers using U.S. equipment, IP, or design software will require a license before shipping to Huawei.
This decision has forced the world's biggest chipmakerTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) to stop taking fresh orders from Huawei, as it uses U.S. equipment in its own manufacturing processes. Paradoxically, then, the Trump administration has exploited pre-existing global supply linkages in the furtherance of a more robust form of economic nationalism. The same policy attitude is now visible with regard to pharmaceuticals (as it is in other parts of the world, to the likely detriment of China and India).
A shift like this will have a knock-on effect that will reverberate to the other parts of the world that for centuries have been forcibly limitedby arms and financeto being sources of raw material export, refined if they were lucky. They will watch closely what happens with Australia, which for the majority of the past 150 years has been an exporter of food and minerals, but is now jumping on the project to establish a national manufacturing base.
As dozens of countries build their own manufacturing basesomething only a handful of countries controlled for most of modern historybig questions will emerge about geopolitical stabilization and the classical tools of foreign influence. The world today in some respects resembles the 19th century's balance-of-power politics, even as the majority of countries understand that some minimal level of state collaboration is essential to combat shared challenges.
China is party to a growing number of global disputes, as emerging great powers typically experience: the U.S. vs. China, China vs. India, Japan vs. China, China vs. Australia, and the EU vs. China. But hot wars are unlikely to feature as prominently as they did two centuries ago.
Expect to see Cold War-style conflict intensify, however, albeit in new forms. Instead of the old geopolitical arenas including access to vital commodities or stable petroleum markets, the new forms of the competition will put greater weight on access to advanced research and technologies, such as the collection, transfer and storage of data and the quantum computing power to process it.
The speed at which global supply chains can potentially shift to accommodate the rise in economic nationalism is considerable. The success with which we manage the transition will largely settle the debate as to whether it is in fact the better path to greater prosperity and global stability. [IDN-InDepthNews 04 July 2020]
Image credit: Caribbean News Global (CGN)
IDN is flagship agency of the Non-profit International Press Syndicate.
Visit us on Facebook and Twitter.
- Clearing the way toward robust quantum computing - MIT News - June 16th, 2021
- Heres How Quantum Computers Will Really Affect Cryptocurrencies - Forbes - June 16th, 2021
- New quantum computing company will set the pace - Cambridge Network - June 16th, 2021
- Honeywell joins hands with Cambridge Quantum Computing to form a new company - The Hindu - June 16th, 2021
- NSWCDD Focuses on Quantum Computing with its First-Ever Hackathon - Naval Sea Systems Command - June 16th, 2021
- Trinity College teams up with Microsoft on quantum computing programme - The Irish Times - June 16th, 2021
- Honeywell Quantum, Cambridge Quantum Computing form joint venture - Reuters - June 8th, 2021
- With cyberattacks on the rise, organizations are already bracing for devastating quantum hacks - CNBC - June 8th, 2021
- Swedish university is behind quantum computing breakthrough - ComputerWeekly.com - June 8th, 2021
- Global Quantum Computing Market to Gain $667.3 Million and Surge at a CAGR of 30.0% from 2020-2027 Timeframe - Exclusive [193 pages] COVID-19 Impact... - June 8th, 2021
- The 'second quantum revolution' is almost here. We need to make sure it benefits the many, not the few - The Conversation AU - June 8th, 2021
- UK govt and IBM together to build 210M AI & quantum computing centre in Daresbury - UKTN (UK Technology News - June 8th, 2021
- Archer Materials "one of the front-runners" in the quantum computing economy - Proactive Investors Australia - June 8th, 2021
- Quantum Computing & Technologies Market Share at a CAGR of 32.5 %, Trends, Growth, Sales, Demand, Revenue, Size, Forecast and COVID-19 Impacts... - June 8th, 2021
- Bristol startup scores 3.1M to control next-gen quantum hacks threatening the future of internet - UKTN (UK Technology News - June 8th, 2021
- How Will Federal Investment in Quantum Affect Local Gov? - Governing - June 8th, 2021
- STFC and IBM sign 210m AI and quantum computing deal - BusinessCloud - June 8th, 2021
- $100 Million to Advance Duke Science and Technology Research - Duke Today - June 8th, 2021
- Jlich, University of Wrzburg Investigating Innovations for Quantum Computing with Topological Insulators - HPCwire - June 2nd, 2021
- Quantum computing investments on the rise - Help Net Security - June 2nd, 2021
- IBM has partnered with IITs, others to advance training, research in quantum computing - Elets - June 2nd, 2021
- Toshiba and 10 other Japanese firms to form quantum tech tie-up - The Japan Times - June 2nd, 2021
- Illinois, IBM creating $200M Institute on emerging technology | - University Business - June 2nd, 2021
- CINECA and D-Wave Expand Access to Quantum Computing Technology and Resources in Italy - HPCwire - May 16th, 2021
- New Evidence for Controversial Theory That the Electron Is Composed of Two Particles - SciTechDaily - May 16th, 2021
- Outlook on the Quantum Technology Global Market to 2026 - - GlobeNewswire - May 16th, 2021
- IBM Think 2021- All In On Hybrid Cloud And AI - Forbes - May 16th, 2021
- IBM Think 2021 kicks off with AI innovations and some interesting quantum news - The Next Web - May 16th, 2021
- Quantum Computing Professor, Researcher Yacoby Elected to American Academy of Arts & Sciences - HPCwire - May 1st, 2021
- How Merck works with Seeqc to cut through quantum computing hype - VentureBeat - April 28th, 2021
- Wannabe Wired: When will we feel like we're living in the future? - The Lawton Constitution - April 28th, 2021
- Selected to Build New Supercomputer for the National Supercomputing Centre Singapore - HPCwire - April 28th, 2021
- Six faculty elected to National Academy of Sciences - Stanford Today - Stanford University News - April 28th, 2021
- To make acquisition work, IBM can have preferences says CEO Arvind Krishna, but Red Hat cant - IT World Canada - April 28th, 2021
- Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking in a Superconductor - SciTechDaily - April 28th, 2021
- Will the Government Succeed in Building a Quantum Computing Center? - DesignNews - April 27th, 2021
- What were the fastest growing sectors last year? - BusinessCloud - April 27th, 2021
- Universities across Europe urge EU to remove threat of research ban on Israel, UK and Switzerland - Science Business - April 27th, 2021
- Atos unveils global R&D Lab to drive innovation in Cybersecurity, High Performance Computing and Quantum - GlobeNewswire - April 27th, 2021
- Quantum Computing Technologies market size to expand momentously over 2021-2026 - Business-newsupdate.com - April 27th, 2021
- Cambridge Quantum pushes into NLP and quantum computing with new head of AI - VentureBeat - April 24th, 2021
- Quantum: It's still not clear what its good for, but Amazon and QCI will help developers find out - ZDNet - April 24th, 2021
- Are We Doomed to Repeat History? The Looming Quantum Computer Event Horizon - Electronic Design - April 24th, 2021
- Fine-tuning the color of light | Stanford News - Stanford University News - April 24th, 2021
- Cleveland Clinic and IBM hope their tech partnership could help prevent the next pandemic - WTHITV.com - April 24th, 2021
- Quantum Computing Market Share Current and Future Industry Trends, 2020 to 2027 The Courier - The Courier - April 24th, 2021
- Atos unveils global R&D Lab to drive innovation in Cybersecurity, High Performance Computing and Quantum - Yahoo Finance UK - April 24th, 2021
- The first 100 days: What does President Bidens approach to the world look like so far? - Brookings Institution - April 24th, 2021
- Cleveland Clinic and IBM Partner on HPC, AI and Quantum Computing - insideHPC - April 8th, 2021
- OneConnect Financial Technology and Singapore Management University announce key findings from joint research on potential for quantum computing to... - April 8th, 2021
- Cleveland Clinic, IBM launch 10-year quantum computing partnership - Healthcare IT News - March 31st, 2021
- Quantum computing: How basic broadband fiber could pave the way to the next breakthrough - ZDNet - March 31st, 2021
- IBM's first 'retail' quantum computer in the US headed to Cleveland Clinic - CNET - March 31st, 2021
- Honeywell says quantum computers will outpace standard verification in 18 to 24 months - VentureBeat - March 31st, 2021
- Cleveland Clinic, IBM ink a ten-year quantum computing dealhere are 2 ways the tech can be used in healthcare - eMarketer - March 31st, 2021
- Cleveland Clinic will be IBMs first private sector customer to install a quantum computer on premises - VentureBeat - March 31st, 2021
- Cleveland Clinic and IBM hope their tech partnership could help prevent the next pandemic - WXII The Triad - March 31st, 2021
- Cleveland Clinic and IBM announce 10-year partnership; includes first quantum computer for healthcare research - WKYC.com - March 31st, 2021
- IBM brings quantum computer to Cleveland Clinic -- but what is that? The Wake Up for Wednesday, March 31, 2021 - cleveland.com - March 31st, 2021
- IBM partners with Cleveland Clinic to build on-site quantum computer | The Burn-In - The Burn-In - March 31st, 2021
- In battle with U.S., China to focus on 7 'frontier' technologies from chips to brain-computer fusion - CNBC - March 6th, 2021
- Quantum computing, drones and 3D printing what South African schools could be teaching by 2030 - BusinessTech - March 6th, 2021
- Quantum Xchange Wins Cyber Security Global Excellence Awards for the Third Consecutive Year - PRNewswire - March 6th, 2021
- UK Government to invest 153 million in quantum research projects - Finextra - March 6th, 2021
- Quantum internet one step closer to reality with innovative wavelength switch - E&T Magazine - March 6th, 2021
- Quantum Computing Startup IonQ in Talks to Go Public Through Merger with DMY SPAC - Data Center Knowledge - March 2nd, 2021
- Why now is the right time to invest in European quantum computing - Sifted - March 2nd, 2021
- Google Teams With D-Wave in Massive Quantum Computing Leap, Cracking Simulation Problem - The Daily Hodl - March 2nd, 2021
- SD Times Open-Source Project of the Week: PennyLane - SDTimes.com - March 2nd, 2021
- The Quantum Computing market is expected to grow from USD 472 million in 2021 to USD 1,765 million by 2026, at a CAGR of 30.2% - GlobeNewswire - February 14th, 2021
- The Quantum Comprehension Gap and the Emergence of Quantum Ethics - insideHPC - February 14th, 2021
- Quantum computing breakthrough uses cryogenics to scale machines to thousands of times their current size - The Independent - February 5th, 2021
- Cambridge named as world-leading centre of quantum computing research - Varsity Online - February 5th, 2021
- IBM's new roadmap for quantum computing promises 100x speedups and then some - Neowin - February 5th, 2021
- This company is using quantum-inspired algorithms to help create the OLED displays of the future - ZDNet - February 5th, 2021
- Quantum Computing 101 -What it is, how is it different and why it matters - The Jerusalem Post - January 31st, 2021
- A Quantum Leap Is Coming: Ones, Zeros And Everything In Between - Transmission & Distribution World - January 31st, 2021
- University of Glasgow partners with Oxford Instruments NanoScience on quantum computing - SelectScience - January 31st, 2021
- Caltech and NTT developing the world's fastest quantum computer - Digital Journal - January 31st, 2021
- Aliro Joins the Center for Quantum Networks (CQN) Industry Advisory Board to Lay the Foundations for a Commercially-Available Quantum Internet -... - January 31st, 2021