Page 3,001«..1020..3,0003,0013,0023,003..3,0103,020..»

Best animated films of all time, according to critics – Tulsa World

Animated films have long outgrown their made-for-kids clothes. In fact, as any true movie-lover can attest, animated films today rub elbows with the greatest live-action movies of all time. What was once primarily relegated to the family genre is a full spectrum of animated styles, subjects, and motifs. They join an already legendary list of classic works from production houses like Studio Ghibli and Pixar.

Whether tackling mature themes, including everything from genocide and the criminical justice system, or aiming strictly for the family genre, the top animated films deliver far more quality than one might expect. Even films that were marketed as family-friendly are still able to dig deep to offer existential lessons to children, wrapped in subtlety, while still offering entertainment, humor, charm, and depth for adults. And then there are animated films that are decades-long classics and simply delightful, purely for delights sake.

What they all have in common is that they sit next to a range of live-action masterpieces in terms of durability and timelessness. In 2001, Best Animated Feature was a category added to the Academy Awards. Proving as much are the critical reviews, which can be downright gushing when the movie is well-executed.

But which animated films do critics hail as the best of all time (as of January 2021)? Stacker analyzed data from Metacritic for the answer. To qualify for the forthcoming list of 100 (from worst to first), each film needed at least four professional reviews. In the case of a ratings tie, the film with more reviews ranked higher on the list. Live-action films with occasional animated sequences were not considered for inclusion.

Has your favorite animated film made the cut? Keep reading to find out what the critics had to say.

You may also like: Mistakes from the 50 best movies of all time

See the original post here:
Best animated films of all time, according to critics - Tulsa World

Read More..

McDonald: ‘Mind-boggling’ there isn’t an all-island approach to COVID-19 – Newstalk

The leader of Sinn Fin has advocated once again for an all-island approach to suppressing the transmission of COVID-19 north and south of the Irish Border.

Mary Lou McDonald said the party has been pressing the Irish government, as well as the power-sharing executive in Northern Ireland, about the measure but to no avail.

It comes as the country has passed 100,000 cases of the virus this month,more than all of 2020 combined.

Meanwhile, there have been a total 103,960 positive cases of coronavirus reported in the North to date after a further 426 were confirmed today.

Speaking to On The Record with Gavan Reilly, Ms McDonald said she remains hopeful that a consensus can be reached between the two Governments on an all-Ireland approach to the virus.

She said: "You don't have to be an expert epidemiologist to realise to keep any of us safe, you keep all of us safe, and we have a strategic advantage living on an island."

The Sinn Fin leader said the party had faced particular resistance from unionist politicians in the North who wanted to adhere to guidance from Britain.

Earlier this week, DUP MP Sammy Wilson told Newstalk that an all-island approach to international travel is not acceptable practically or politically, with restrictions between Northern Ireland and Britain unacceptable.

"We have faced a very considerable challenge when some colleagues form unionism have looked to London to take their lead from Boris Johnson, who initially was adopting a very laissez-faire herd immunity approach which would have proved catastrophic for all of us," she said.

McDonald: 'Mind-boggling' there isn't an all-island approach to COVID-19

00:00:00 / 00:00:00

She added that calls for cross border tracking and tracing, "unfortunately didn't happen", but "worse than that", where there was a move to share data on international travel, "the [Irish] Government here resisted that for reasons I can't understand".

"I find that quite mind-boggling," Ms McDonald stated.

"If you look to, for example, Scotland, and what the Scots have done, and they live on the island of Britain, they have been very clear that the assessment that is made on the basis of public health and public health only, and measures that are necessary to protect people's health will be taken."

She is hopeful that given the high levels of community transmission and the prevalence of new variants from the UK, South Africa and Brazil will "refocus and reshape the political conversation" about an all-Ireland approach.

Sinn Fin are not trying to engage in "oneupmanship " or add politics to the issue other than keeping people safe, she said.

Ms McDonald acknowledged that there has been a convergence of public health restrictions north and south of the Border, with measures in place in both regions until March 5th.

She also added that solving international travel onto the island of Ireland "isn't the silver bullet that's going to sort everything out".

"All of the political obstacles and dilemmas are self-evident in this scenario," she stated.

"But I think it should also be self-evident that in the absence of real political drive and will, what you get is a state of inertia and what you get, which is what we have seen, is months of a memorandum of understanding that really opened up a door for joint action and to demonstrate success, but that wasn't grabbed and wasn't pursed."

Ms McDonald added there shouldn't be a "tit for tat" response from the UK after a row over Article 16 on Friday.

The North's First Minister Arlene Foster said yesterday that the British Prime Minister should use the emergency clause, which is part of the Brexit deal.

It comes after the European Commission planned to use it to stop COVID-19 vaccines leaving the jurisdiction, plans that were scrapped after strong criticism.

The EU "blindsided" member states by attempting to impose controls on vaccines being exported to Northern Ireland, the Taoiseach Michel Martin said today.

Ms McDonald said Friday's events were a "grave error" and a "mistake that was compounded by the fact that nobody was made aware that this was the thinking of the Commission".

This includes chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier, Dublin or London, which caused a level of "deep concern and annoyance", she stated.

"The whole Brexit deal has been framed by an understanding by most of us and an acknowledgement that there never any good Brexit and it was going to bring real and enduring damage, not least to Ireland.

"The Protocol was secured over a very protected period of time just to afford some basic protections for the island of Ireland as a whole."

If the deal has been made in a more orderly and organised fashion, it would have given everyone concerned time to prepare, but that's not what happened, she added.

Ms McDonald said that while the events on Friday "took everybody by surprise", she was relieved that the EU Commission back away from the proposed triggering of Article 16.

"To those who are now saying the British Prime Minister should reciprocate, should enter into a kind of tit for tat triggering of Article 16, that would be absolutely irresponsible and should not be countenanced," she warned.

"Those who are making that call need to give their heads a shake a reconsider their position.

She confirmed that this includes Arlene Foster.

The Sinn Fin leader believes a "frank discussion" needs to be had with the Commission "to remind everyone of the purpose of the Protocol and to ensure we don't have a repeat performance of what was unfolding on Friday night".

Such a level of "common understanding" is needed to give a sense of "stability" and "no drama", she added.

Read the original post:
McDonald: 'Mind-boggling' there isn't an all-island approach to COVID-19 - Newstalk

Read More..

Bitcoin and Inflation: Everything You Need to Know – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Crypto enthusiasts often talk about bitcoin as a hedge against inflation. Why?

The argument is that central bank money printing will lead to inflation or the decrease in the value of money over time. Bitcoin, by contrast, has a fixed limit of 21 million coins that can ever be created. This limited supply allows bitcoin to resist inflation.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented the ideal conditions to test this theory once countries across the world began injecting trillions of dollars into their economies. Many countries, including the U.S., printed money to meet stimulus requirements for its citizens.

Yesterday, the chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell said the central bank welcomes higher inflation in 2021 as a sign that the economy is picking up again after the pandemic-slump.

Governments hoped an expansionary monetary policy, whereby central banks increased the amount of money available to people, would keep economies moving amid prolonged shutdowns of certain sections of the economy. By June 2020, stimulus action taken by countries had surpassed $10 trillion, according to a McKinsey Global report. U.S. government-spending alone amounted to $6.5 trillion in 2020, up 48% from the previous year.

Theres a crazy amount of money being printed right now, so the value of money is going down. Assets with limited supply, like bitcoin, real estate or shares/stocks, those price tags are going up, Oki Matsumoto, CEO of Monex Group told CoinDesk.

Its true that despite dramatic drops in global economic output and unemployment, market jitters drove asset prices up: the stock market ended the year with record gains. Even bitcoin, considered a fringe asset, had a historic price run, gaining more than 250% by the end of 2020.

These gains were partly influenced by traditional investors who saw bitcoins potential to work as a hedge against inflation.

And yet, the kind of inflation investors were expecting isnt here, at least not yet. In fact, U.S. inflation remained stable through 2020. Some economists dont believe that inflation in America will be running rampant any time soon. Others think a little post-pandemic inflation might even be a good thing.

What is inflation, anyway?

It depends on whom you ask.

The U.S. Federal Reserve defines inflation as the increase in the price of goods and services over time, but many associate it with a change in the money supply, or the total amount of money in circulation.

In the bitcoin world, they dont use the term inflation quite the way that economists do, as a general increase in consumer price. Instead, they tend to use it to mean an increase in the money supply, said economist and CoinDesk columnist Frances Coppola.

The crypto argument that printing more money leads to inflation does sound compelling, Michael Ashton, inflation consultant and JPMorgan alum, told CoinDesk. When there is a change in the relative quantity of two goods, the one that is increasing in quantity tends to get cheaper, he said, adding that this happens with foreign exchange all the time.

The reason why the Mexican peso has been cheap relative to the U.S. dollar for a long time is because the supply of Mexican Pesos has consistently outpaced the supply of U.S. dollars, Ashton said. Because here are a lot more pesos than dollars out there, he explained, the value of the peso in exchange markets goes down.

Thats part of the crypto argument. They say, Were gonna limit how fast cryptocurrency supply can grow and since we are printing all these dollars, then that means that the dollar has to depreciate a lot relative to crypto. Therefore, the price of crypto should rise over time, Ashton said.

Calvo said the view that you can control the price levels of goods and services through money supply is not limited to the crypto world but shared by investors in general, and for good reason. When you look at many countries over a long period of time, you can see some association between the increase in money supply and inflation, Calvo added.

But Calvo, Coppola and Ashton all agree that increasing the amount of money in the economy with a stimulus package, for example does not guarantee a rise in price levels.

If you increase your money supply, you may or may not get an increase in the consumer price level depending on what else is going on in the economy at the time. So there are a number of other factors to consider, Coppola said.

Money is printing, is inflation soaring?

Not really, at least in the U.S.

The U.S. Federal Reserve has an inflation target of 2% measured using the consumer price index (CPI). In 2020, despite inflationary fears due to pandemic-related spending, the U.S. inflation rate hovered around 1.5%, well below target.

One explanation for the relative stability of U.S. inflation is money velocity, which quantifies how fast money changes hands in an economy. If the money supply is increased, but people dont spend a lot of money quickly, inflation can remain in balance.

After the pandemic hit, consumer spending suffered around the world, with countries including the U.S., India, Japan and Germany reporting large drops in household spending. As multiple states in the U.S. went under lockdown, people stayed home instead of dining out, celebrations and gatherings stopped, and travel came to a screeching halt.

People spending less meant the demand for goods and services in general had dropped. Global energy demand declined 6% in the first few months of 2020, its biggest drop since World War II, according to the international energy agency (IEA).

Weaker demand and significantly lower oil prices are holding down consumer price inflation, the Federal Reserve wrote in its June 2020 monetary policy report.

The World Bank, in fact, projected a fall in global commodity prices.

It is under these prevailing conditions that the U.S. government was distributing stimulus funds.

So people are accumulating money, but it is not reflected in the price level, Calvo said.

Ashton explained this may be because money velocity is very low. People are not getting rid of U.S. dollars fast enough, so the price levels dont increase dramatically.

When you drop a ton of money into peoples bank accounts, they cant spend it instantly. So, mathematically, you have to have a declining money velocity. Thats what happened, Ashton said.

What about outside the U.S.?

American inflationary fears may be in part due to whats happening in other parts of the world. Some investors may be looking at countries like Argentina and Venezuela where printing money has led to very high inflation.

What investors are doing, in general, is looking ahead and saying, were seeing a lot of money going into the economy. Therefore, there is a risk that it could happen in the United States; therefore, we need to invest in things that will protect us from that inflation, if it happens. Thats the conventional inflation is coming, we need to protect against it argument, Coppola said.

But in the countries they are looking at, things work differently, Coppola added.

Venezuela and Argentina are hyperinflationary economies where price levels grow rapidly and excessively triggered by an increase in the money supply or a shortage in supply relative to demand.

In Venezuela, for instance, printing money led to jaw dropping increases in food prices last year. The international monetary fund (IMF) reported that the inflation rate in Venezuela was a whopping 6500% in 2020.

In hyperinflationary countries, years of political and economic instability have exhausted the option of printing money without leading to uncontrollable inflation, Calvo said. Coppola added that countries struggling with hyperinflation have other contributing issues like high foreign exchange debt, war, occupation or something political.

Argentina, for example, has had a long and complicated economic crisis riddled with astronomical debt obligations and political instability that often has citizens scrambling to convert their Argentine pesos into sturdier assets or currencies.

In Argentina, the minute [the government] starts increasing the money supply, very quickly, you see the consequences in the price level, Calvo said, adding, Some countries have the privilege of printing money if necessary. Nothing happens. Argentina doesnt have that privilege.

Interestingly, the pandemic has not particularly spurred inflation in Argentina either. By mid-2020, inflation in Argentina had reached a two-year-low, according to a Focus Economics report.

Because Argentines were also under lockdown during the pandemic, the slowed economy and low demand combined with increases in government spending hasnt caused a major rise in price levels, Calvo said.

If inflation isnt soaring, why are people hedging against it?

People may be buying bitcoin as a hedge against future inflation, and theyre not crazy to do so.

According to a statement made to the media by Federal Reserve Vice Chair Richard Carida, the Federal Reserve will continue to maintain near zero interest rates until inflation rises enough to meet its 2% target.

U.S. policy makers know exactly what theyre doing, said Phillip Gillespie, chief executive officer of crypto liquidity provider B2C2 Japan.

They are basically going to suppress the interest rates and let inflation run higher, Gillespie told CoinDesk.

But economists are saying that as the country reopens and spending picks up, reining in price levels to maintain the inflation target will be one of the biggest challenges in the Federal Reserves 108-year history.

So naturally, investors are reacting to all the inflation doom and gloom by betting against it, turning an alternative asset like bitcoin into the 2020 breakout star of inflation hedging in the process.

Bitcoin inherited a lot of the same selling points that made gold a preferred inflation hedge like scarcity and portability, according to J.P. Koning, Canadian financial writer and founder of the popular blog Moneyness.

But when it comes to serving as a hedge against inflation, bitcoin is hardly alone.

If you look around your house, everything is an inflation hedge, Koning said. Your house itself is an inflation hedge, your table, your personal capital, your education are all inflation hedges because all of those things will rise in value as the purchasing power of the currency falls.

See the original post:
Bitcoin and Inflation: Everything You Need to Know - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

Read More..

Demand Dips For Bitcoin Are Temporary; But Lack Of Supply Is Permanent – Forbes

Bitcoin's demand may fluctuate, but supply is known.

From the Double Spend scare of January 20, 2021 to the flight to the relative safety of cryptocurrencys decentralized trading platform on January 30, 2021, a ten day window in the life of Bitcoin illustrates the power of fixed supply versus variable demand on prices.

When rumors surfaced of a possible glitch in the blockchain system supporting Bitcoin, buying interest in the megacrypto briefly waned. In all markets, any seed of doubt, especially in a still nascent, somewhat hard to understand asset, will send some investors to the sidelines. This is what happened for about a week in the Bitcoin markets, and prices pulled back. But when instability hit trading platforms in the wake of the Reddit inspired investing frenzy in heavily shorted securities, resurgent demand for Bitcoin popped prices back up towards their all time highs, largely because Bitcoin supply did not increase rapidly enough to meet demand.

The double spend Bitcoin rumors were unequivocally proven false, stemming from a naturally occurring but extremely rare bifurcation in the resolution system for blockchain transactions that basically self corrects as blockchain activities progress. (At least thats the best way I can describe things with my very limited understanding of the process. Suffice it to say, in plain English, that the system is rock solid and Bitcoin lives on unscathed.)

Market prices decline when there is a lack of demand; buyers pull back and those needing to sell, being more motivated for whatever reason, have to chase prices lower in order to cash in their holdings. In Bitcoins case, the double spend rumors temporarily chased buyers away and left those needing to sell searching for buyers at lower prices. When the sellers had completed their initial round of selling, prices for Bitcoin had dropped around 15 percent from their peak in the early morning hours of January 20, 2021 to their trough in the evening of January 21, 2021. This is what happens when demand for something dries up. Prices go lower.

Prices also go lower when supply of something exceeds demand. In Bitcoins case, this rarely happens, because Bitcoins current supply is known, the rate of Bitcoins possible added supply (from mining activities) is also known, and the ultimate supply of Bitcoin is fixed at 21 million. In a macro sense, the supply of Bitcoin, being fixed, cant really ever keep up with demand, so long as demand keeps rising.

And while one-off events like the double spend rumors may negatively impact demand for Bitcoin temporarily, in the long term scheme of things demand for Bitcoin has more reasons to keep rising than can be reasonably enumerated in this article. But one reason stood out on January 30, 2021 more than others.

The actions that Robinhood and other brokerage houses took to limit the ability of investor participation in trading certain securities sent shockwaves through the retail investing world, seeding doubt, uncertainty, and anger amongst millions of new traders. Many of these new market participants came to the first time realization that the free market system isnt actually as free as they thought, and legions of them sought refuge in the still wild-west like, largely unregulated arena of cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin, the king of the crypto world, saw demand rise again, and that demand rose faster than supply. In just 10 days time, the world saw the impact of fluctuating demand in a fixed supply market.

When demand for something goes up: prices go higher, but only if supply does not increase to meet demand. This price rationing is what makes markets work efficiently. Crypto markets are as efficient as any market in the world right now, which means they will behave according to the basic free market precepts of supply, demand, and pricing.

This is what happened in the case of Bitcoin, and its what will keep happening for the foreseeable future so long as Bitcoin keeps gaining popularity in the investment world. All of this suggests Bitcoin prices will likely go up over time, because price rationing is what ultimately balances the imbalances created by fluctuations in demand and supply. If demand rises and supply does not rise correspondingly, then prices will rise until demand is curbed.

Investing in Bitcoin will remain interesting, challenging, and volatile, because while Bitcoins ultimate supply is known and its rate of added supply is also known, demand is still the main variable that will move prices in the future. The events of the past 10 days have provided a valuable real time lesson in supply and demand economics.

See the article here:
Demand Dips For Bitcoin Are Temporary; But Lack Of Supply Is Permanent - Forbes

Read More..

Laying out the biggest risks of investing in bitcoin in 2021 – KTAR.com

(Pixabay Photo)

No matter where you stand on bitcoin, we can agree on one thing: Its polarizing. Some investors believe its the way of the future and others think its a scam.

However, its gaining popularity. Its likely that the coronavirus pandemic accelerated its acceptance by pushing more retail online. Now, more than one-third of small- and medium-sized businesses will take bitcoin as payment.

And even bigger businesses like Microsoft are starting to accept it. Also, fans of bitcoin see it as a safeguard against inflation. And since the Federal Reserve has been printing money left and right, some are getting nervous about the future of the dollar.

You might be wondering: Should I jump on the bitcoin bandwagon, or run in the opposite direction? Here are four risks I want you to consider before taking the plunge:

Bitcoin is one of the most volatile investments you could make

Bitcoin goes through incredible spikes and plummets in value. Back in July of 2010, a year after bitcoin was released to the world, a bitcoin was worth only eight cents.

The value jumped all over the place until it really started to make some waves in 2017. One bitcoin reached a value of $1,000 early on, then zoomed to $5,000 in October, then doubled to $10,000 in November.

By mid-December one bitcoins value was almost $20,000. The bubble finally burst and the value dropped to about $3,500 by November 2018.

But bitcoins value started to skyrocket again in 2020. Just a couple weeks ago, the value of a bitcoin had hit an all-time high of just under $42,000, but then tanked within 24 hours down to $34,863.

Will it continue to grow in value? We dont know. But the reality is that volatility always equals risk. And risk isnt a bad thing, but you need to be aware of what it might cost in the end.

Bitcoin has a bit of an identity crisis

Does bitcoin have more in common with the U.S. dollar or with gold? The answer is both.

While bitcoin is a currency, Uncle Sam has a different take. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission sees bitcoin as a commodity (like gold), while the IRS treats it like property, which means you guessed it they can tax it.

We need to keep in mind that bitcoin is still the new kid on the block. While its been around for over 10 years now, we still dont have any tried and true best practices for building wealth with bitcoin.

Bitcoin is not regulated by any central bank or nation

Bitcoin has been shrouded in mystery ever since it was released in 2009. It operates without oversight from any bank or nation-state, meaning its exchanged peer to peer.

Its like the Wild West of currencies theres no marshal to uphold the law. For some, this is an attractive feature. Others recognize the risk that comes with zero regulation.

Bitcoin is widely used for illegal activity

Since all bitcoin trading is handled anonymously, the cryptocurrency scene is a hot spot for cybercrimes.

All sorts of shady things, from blackmail to phishing to Ponzi schemes to deals done on the dark web, take place using bitcoin.

Of course, there are plenty of upstanding people who use cryptocurrencies as well. But hackers who know a lot more about coding and software than the average Joe can use that knowledge to their advantage, so be careful.

As youve probably guessed, Im not a fan of bitcoin. I would much rather see you invest your hard-earned cash in proven methods for building wealth, like tax-advantaged retirement accounts and growth stock mutual funds.

But if you want to learn more about bitcoin, check out our full blog post on the subject.

The most important thing is to be aware, informed and in control of your financial choices at all times!

Read the original here:
Laying out the biggest risks of investing in bitcoin in 2021 - KTAR.com

Read More..

Guggenheim CIO Says Institutional Demand Not There to Sustain Bitcoin Above $30K – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Scott Minerd, chief investment officer of the multi-billion dollar investment firm Guggenheim Partners, believes bitcoin may struggle to stay above $30,000.

In an interview with Bloomberg Television on Wednesday, Minerd said he doesnt think bitcoins institutional investor base is big enough or deep enough to justify its current valuation. The comments come weeks after he publicly declared bitcoins price should be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Right now, the reality of the institutional demand that would support a $35,000 price or even a $30,000 price is just not there, he said.

Recently, a JPMorgan analyst said a bearish outlook could be triggered if bitcoin failed to claw its way back over $40,000, leading to steeper losses in the mid-term.

Starting in mid-December, the price of bitcoin soared 110% from $20,000 to $42,000 over a two-week period. Since Jan. 9, 2021, bitcoins price has fallen 25% and is changing hands for around $30,960 at press time.

See the article here:
Guggenheim CIO Says Institutional Demand Not There to Sustain Bitcoin Above $30K - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

Read More..

"Bitcoin can collapse completely," says Agustn Carstens, former Secretary of the Treasury – Entrepreneur

The current manager of the Bank for International Settlements, ensures that central banks must control Bitcoin and all digital money.

This book gives you the essential guide for easy-to-follow tips and strategies to create more financial success.

January30, 20212 min read

At the height of the cryptocurrency boom, the manager of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) , Agustn Carstens , warned about the dangers of investing in them. The former finance secretary warned that Bitcoin is increasingly vulnerable and could completely collapse .

Yesterday, January 27, during the policy seminar of the Hoover Institution , the Mexican economist said that Bitcoin is a speculative asset, not money .

Investors should be aware that Bitcoin can completely crash. Scarcity and crypto alone are not enough to guarantee exchange, " explained Carstens , adding that " Bitcoin is increasingly vulnerable .

The also former governor of Banco de Mxico , affirms that central banks must control the issuance and management of digital money . Consider that they have the financial structure to guarantee the stability of the cryptocurrencies .

For digital money to exist, the central bank must play a fundamental role, guaranteeing the stability of the value, ensuring the elasticity of the aggregate supply of said money and overseeing the general security of the system. Such a system must not fail and cannot tolerate serious errors , Carstens said.

The BIS manager said that other private stablecoin projects, such as Facebook's , are more credible than Bitcoin , but need to be regulated.

"In general, private stablecoins cannot serve as the foundation for a sound monetary system ," he said. But to remain credible, they must be strictly regulated and supervised. They must build on the foundations and confidence that the existing central banks give them and, therefore, be part of the existing financial system .

For now, many countries are targeting Central Bank digital currencies (CBDC) . In fact, 86% of major central banks are actively exploring CBDCs , according to a recent BIS survey.

Carstens indicated that national CBDCs would be used in various ways, such as the transmission of monetary policy and the management of interest rates. He explained that they should be complementary to the existing cash system , as completely replacing all bank accounts and cash with digital money is "undesirable" and "unrealistic ."

See more here:
"Bitcoin can collapse completely," says Agustn Carstens, former Secretary of the Treasury - Entrepreneur

Read More..

Should you invest in bitcoin in 2021? | Local News Stories | willistonherald.com – Williston Daily Herald

No matter where you stand on bitcoin, we can agree on one thing: Its polarizing. Some investors believe its the way of the future and others think its a scam.

However, its gaining popularity. Its likely that the coronavirus pandemic accelerated its acceptance by pushing more retail online. Now, more than one-third of small- and medium-sized businesses will now take bitcoin as payment.1 And even bigger businesses like Microsoft are starting to accept it.2 Also, fans of bitcoin see it as a safeguard against inflation. And since the Federal Reserve has been printing money left and right, some are getting nervous about the future of the dollar.

You might be wondering: Should I jump on the bitcoin bandwagon, or run in the opposite direction? Here are four risks I want you to consider before taking the plunge:

Bitcoin is one of the most volatile investments you could make

Bitcoin goes through incredible spikes and plummets in value. Back in July of 2010, a year after bitcoin was released to the world, a bitcoin was worth only eight cents. The value jumped all over the place until it really started to make some waves in 2017. One bitcoin reached a value of $1,000 early on, then zoomed to $5,000 in October, then doubled to $10,000 in November. By mid-December one bitcoins value was almost $20,000. The bubble finally burst, and the value dropped to about $3,500 by November 2018.3

But bitcoins value started to skyrocket again in 2020. Just a couple weeks ago, the value of a bitcoin had hit an all-time high of just under $42,000but then tanked within 24 hours down to $34,863.4

Will it continue to grow in value? We dont know. But the reality is that volatility always equals risk. And risk isnt a bad thing, but you need to be aware of what it might cost in the end.

Bitcoin has a bit of an identity crisis

Does bitcoin have more in common with the U.S. dollar or with gold? The answer is both. While bitcoin is a currency, Uncle Sam has a different take. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission sees bitcoin as a commodity (like gold), while the IRS treats it like property which meansyou guessed itthey can tax it.5, 6

We need to keep in mind that bitcoin is still the new kid on the block. While its been around for over 10 years now, we still dont have any tried and true best practices for building wealth with bitcoin.

Bitcoin is not regulated by any central bank or nation

Bitcoin has been shrouded in mystery ever since an unknown person named Satoshi Nakamoto released it into the world back in 2009.7 It operates without oversight from any bank or nation-state, meaning its exchanged peer to peer. Its like the Wild West of currenciestheres no marshal to uphold the law. For some, this is an attractive feature. Others recognize the risk that comes with zero regulation.

Bitcoin is widely used for illegal activity

Since all bitcoin trading is handled anonymously, the cryptocurrency scene is a hot spot for cybercrimes. All sorts of shady things, from blackmail to phishing to Ponzi schemes to deals done on the dark web, take place using bitcoin.8

Of course, there are plenty of upstanding people who use cryptocurrencies as well. But hackers who know a lot more about coding and software than the average Joe can use that knowledge to their advantageso be careful.

As youve probably guessed, Im not a fan of bitcoin. I would much rather see you invest your hard-earned cash in proven methods for building wealth, like tax-advantaged retirement accounts and growth stock mutual funds. But if you want to learn more about bitcoin, check out our full blog post on the subject. The most important thing is to be aware, informed, and in control of your financial choices at all times!

Chris Hogan is a two-time #1 national best-selling author, financial expert and host of The Chris Hogan Show. He is a frequent guest on Fox News, Fox Business, Yahoo! Finance, and the Rachael Ray Show. Since 2005, Hogan has served at Ramsey Solutions, where he gives practical money advice on retirement, investing and building wealth. Follow Chris on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube or online at chrishogan360.com.

View original post here:
Should you invest in bitcoin in 2021? | Local News Stories | willistonherald.com - Williston Daily Herald

Read More..

How Tax Time Is Taking a Toll on Bitcoin – ETF Trends

After notching jaw-dropping returns in 2020, Bitcoin is scuffling to start 2021, but that may be more a case of seasonality than weak underlying fundamentals. The largest digital currency could be in stronger form several months from now.

Some crypto market experts believe one reason Bitcoin is slumping to start the new year is tax selling, Many investors that made profits on Bitcoin waited until January to sell to avoid paying taxes on those gains for the 2020 tax year.

By selling this month, those investors wont have to pay Uncle Sam his taxes until they file for the 2021 tax year, which will be sometime in early 2022.

According to Delphi Digitals January bitcoin outlook report, one of the biggest reasons for the drop is that those [investors and traders]who realized significant gains trading various crypto assets last year will likely have to sell at least a portion of their holdings to cover expected tax liabilities, reports Muyao Shen for CoinDesk.

Recently, some big name investors signaled their interest in blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. That comes against a backdrop of potentially favorable seasonality. Recently, the Bitcoin Dominance Index has been rising, confirming the dominant perch of the cryptocurrency.

There is significant room for growth in the cryptocurrency universe. Recent data suggest a small amount of American investors own any digital currencies and after Bitcoin, the numberof crypto owners dwindles precipitously.

Its difficult to pinpoint exactly how much selling pressure can be expected, and different jurisdictions treat capital gains more favorably than others, Kevin Kelly, co-founder and head of global macro at Delphi Digital, said. But bitcoin alone added more than $400 billion to its total market value last year. A decent portion of those returns accrued to speculators and traders who may have already realized some gains or rolled profits into other corners of the crypto market, thus triggering taxable events.

Investors wondering when favorable Bitcoin seasonality kicks in dont have to wait long. This time period tends to arrive late in tax season when tax selling abates.

For more news, information, and strategy, visit the Crypto Channel.

The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are solely those of Tom Lydon, and may not actually come to pass. Information on this site should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any product.

Read more here:
How Tax Time Is Taking a Toll on Bitcoin - ETF Trends

Read More..

Home – Springer

Journal

Volume 1 / 2019 - Volume 3 / 2021

Article

Deaeration is a process of eliminating aspirated air from liquid in hydraulic reservoirs to avoid cavitation in the downstream pump blades. The complex fluid dynamics associated with deaeration is investigated...

Sourabh Mukhopadhyay, Ganesh Nimbalkar in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

The article Thermal hydraulic considerations of nuclear reactor systems: Past, present and future challenges written by Guan Heng Yeoh, was originally published electronically on the publishers internet por...

Guan Heng Yeoh in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

The article From indoor exposure to inhaled particle deposition: A multiphase journey of inhaled particles written by Kiao Inthavong, was originally published electronically on the publishers internet porta...

Kiao Inthavong in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

The article One-dimensional drift-flux correlations for two-phase flow in medium-size channels written by Takashi Hibiki, was originally published electronically on the publishers internet portal (currently...

Takashi Hibiki in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

Solid particles heavily affect the hydrodynamics in slurry bubble columns. The effects arise through varying breakup and coalescence behavior of the bubbles with the presence of solid particles where particles...

Adam Mhlbauer, Mark W. Hlawitschka in Experimental and Computational Multiphase (2021)

Article

The article Effect of interfacial drag force model on code prediction for upward adiabatic two-phase bubbly flow in vertical channels written by Takashi Hibiki and Tetsuhiro Ozaki, was originally published e...

Takashi Hibiki, Tetsuhiro Ozaki in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

The phase change of water or other liquids is a process that takes part in many technical applications. The field of research is widely diversified with domains in energy technology, air conditioning, and even...

Daniel Wickert, Gnther Prokop in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

The article State-of-the-art in plant component flow-induced vibration (FIV) written by Shuichiro Miwa and Takashi Hibiki, was originally published electronically on the publishers internet portal (currentl...

Shuichiro Miwa, Takashi Hibiki in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

Numerical study of the dense gas-solid flow in a bubbling fluidized bed has been conducted via the multiphase particle-in-cell approach. Based on the numerical results, the mesoscale bubble dynamics combined w...

Zhanghao Wan, Shiliang Yang, Hua Wang in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

The article A review of pebble flow study for pebble bed high temperature gas-cooled reactor written by Shengyao Jiang, Jiyuan Tu, Xingtuan Yang, and Nan Gui, was originally published electronically on the p...

Shengyao Jiang, Jiyuan Tu, Xingtuan Yang in Experimental and Computational Multiphase (2021)

Article

In the heat transportation of core of high temperature gas-cooled nuclear reactor (HTGR), radiative heat transfer plays a significant role in the CFD-DEM simulations. The numerical investigation is conducted f...

Hao Wu, Nan Gui, Xingtuan Yang, Jiyuan Tu in Experimental and Computational Multiphase (2021)

Article

This paper presents a review of the latest experimental and theoretical studies on enhancing boiling/evaporative heat transfer using nanofabricated porous coatings, with potential applications in the fields of...

Xiangdong Li in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

Amongst the multitude of approaches available in literature to reduce spurious velocities in Volume of Fluid approach, the Sharp Surface Force (SSF) model is increasingly being used due to its relative ease to...

Kurian J. Vachaparambil in Experimental and Computational Multiphase (2021)

Article

In this work, an efficient model for simulating bubble dispersion and coalescence due to turbulence is developed in the Euler-Lagrange framework. The primary liquid phase is solved on the Euler grid with the R...

Xinghao Yang, Mark-Patrick Mhlhausen in Experimental and Computational Multiphase (2021)

Article

Dirk Lucas in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

The dynamics of bubble deformation has significant impacts on two-phase flow fundamentals such as bubble induced turbulence and flow regime transition. Despite the significant progress achieved by experimental...

Yuqiao Fan, Jun Fang, Igor Bolotnov in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

An assessment of a two-fluid model assuming a continuous liquid and a dispersed gas phase for 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of gas/liquid flow in a centrifugal research pump is performed. A...

Markus Hundshagen, Michael Mansour in Experimental and Computational Multiphase (2021)

Article

Mass, momentum, and energy transfer in bubbly flows strongly depends on the bubbles size distribution, which determines the contact area between the interacting phases. Characterization of bubble sizes in pol...

D. Papoulias, A. Vichansky, M. Tandon in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Article

This work deals with a new methodology for the implementation of high-resolution (HR) schemes employed to advect the volume fraction in the volume of fluid (VOF) method, in which the numerical stability and co...

Jessica Mario-Salguero, Michael Schfer in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow (2021)

Excerpt from:

Home - Springer

Read More..